Linux-Networking Digest #96, Volume #10 Wed, 3 Feb 99 07:13:37 EST
Contents:
Re: PPP Version Inconsistencies (Clifford Kite)
Re: Turning off ppp noise from modem? (Ed Jones)
Advice on Ethernet MiniHub (Clayton Russell)
Re: PPP hangs after lots of data (Chris Croughton)
Re: lessons learned while setting up masquerading (Rick Onanian)
Re: Help with simple manual network configuration (Ed Jones)
Using linux for fax serving ("Richard Hitchell")
Re: How do I make domain match my machine? (Jim Harper)
Linux, Sockets and Java ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Red_Hat setup problems (James Youngman)
Re: NFS and dynamic IP address (John Baron)
minicom "killed by signal 11" ("Jean-Fran�ois")
Anyone know of good firewall and proxyfor linux? ("Scott MacDonald")
Xircom CEM 56 and Thinkpad 600E (Michael W. Godfrey)
Re: rlogin and .rhosts (John Strange)
Re: Strange prob w/telnet (John Strange)
Help: FTP hang Solaris 2.6->Redhat 5.2 ("Arthur P. Smith")
Re: Recognizing the Sohoware Ethernet Network Card ("Rudy Folden")
settings for internet use ("Byte")
PPPD connection hangs-up ( SIGHUP) ("Juha Lehtonen")
network card ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: GTE, DSL and Linux ("Rudy Folden")
Re: Any driver for Xircom Cardbus Ethernet 10/100 + modem 56 ? (Mohd H Misnan)
Specialix ("G.H. Associates Ltd, Manchester, UK")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.ppp,fa.linux.kernel
Subject: Re: PPP Version Inconsistencies
Date: 31 Jan 1999 15:45:36 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I was running (RH) 2.0.36 before I decided to upgrade to 2.2.0-pre9. A week
: and several full kernel recompilations later, PPP is still broken. PPP
: connects okay, but TCP appears to stall after negotiating a connection to a
: web or ftp site. Furthermore, I can continue to ping the sites which appear
: to stall. (I can't ping localhost with a packet size greater than 32708, but
: that could be an unrelated issue).
..
: The 'make kernel' command looks at a different semaphore in the source files
: ("FILEVERSION"). My Linux source FILEVERSIONs are all >= the PPP source
: FILEVERSIONs. Therefore, it assumes all files are up to date. But are they?
: Is this how it's supposed to work? Am I going down the wrong path with the
: $Id lines in the source code? Any input would be extremely helpful.
PPP is probably OK, ppp-2.3.5 works with my 2.1.131 kernel and the "make
install" only copied three stub header (.h) files to /usr/include/net -
nothing was copied to the kernel source tree. I had already compiled
ppp into the kernel and it worked without recompiling.
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* The wealth of a nation is created by the productive labor of its
* citizens. */
------------------------------
From: Ed Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Turning off ppp noise from modem?
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 04:40:01 +0000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello ALL,
> I am running Slackware 3.6 with a USR 33.6 Sportster internal modem. I
> think I have seen posted before how to turn off the ppp noise from the
> modem {some modem init string?} but I can't find the posting. PPP has
> been setup and working fine for some time now thanks to pppsetup, and if
> I run into problems I know I can just tail -f /var/log/messages, so the
> modem noise is not necessary. Anyone know how to put my
> hog-sounding-modem out of its misery?
>
> Thanks
> Navi
Navi, usually the setup string is ATZ or AT&F . These should reset your
modem.
However, please note the following
ATM0 <-- turn off speaker entirely
ATM1 <-- Turn on speaker until carrier detected (usually the reset
default)
ATM2 <-- Internal speaker always off
ATM3 <-- Internal speaker on until carrier detected and off while
dialing
Sound like sometime in the past you may have done ATM3&W which turns on
the speaker and saves that setting into the modems memory.
Ed
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 19:21:16 +1000
From: Clayton Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Advice on Ethernet MiniHub
Hi,
I am looking for advice on a reliable sort of hub for my home. I have a
10BaseT internet connection and two PC's, one runinng Redhat Linux 5.1
and the other running (shock horror) Windows95. I've seen a couple
around for approx $120 AUD but have never heard of the brands. Is their
any good brands which sell similar 5 port hubs for around the same
price?? If so where do I get one in Australia?
Thanks in advance.
Clayton.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Croughton)
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp
Subject: Re: PPP hangs after lots of data
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 20:09:24 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Spivey" wrote:
>I found this at
>http://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/docs/faqs/PPP-FAQ/PPP-FAQ ;
>
>10.4. The ftp transfers seems to be very slow when I do a �get� oper�
> ation. The �put� operation is much faster. Why?
That's the opposite way round from mine - my get operations are fine, but
doing a put of more than a few K starts locking it up. And it's not just
slow (with doulbe charcters etc.), it's no packets sent or received (which
looks size related, smaller packets getting through and larger ones not,
until it gets so that nothing gets through at all).
>Did you specify the option: asyncmap 0 when you ran pppd?
I don't think so. I didn't type it in, anyway, but it may be in a
configuration file somewhere.
>If you forgot the option, the peer must quote (double) all of the
>control characters in the range from 00 to 1F (hex). This will result
>in a statistical loss of about 12.5% in speed for all of the data
>which you receive.
12.5% loss of speed from full speed would be wonderful, that would be an
infinite increase in speed over zero...
> If this is the problem does it create drops in /sbin/ifconfig?
No. I have to drop the line explicitly and restart, ifconfig reports
everything fine, no errors etc.
> Where/How do I specify _asyncmap 0_ ? I start my connection with
>/sbin/ifup ppp0 &.
Hmm, I start it with either wvdial or pppup generally, and I don't know
where it should be put on either of those.
Thanks for the suggestion - eliminating what the problem isn't may spark
an idea about what's left...
(My favourite at the moment is some sort of queue block, but I don't know
how to look for that sort of thing...)
Chris C
------------------------------
From: Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: lessons learned while setting up masquerading
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 16:31:12 -0500
Frank Sweetser wrote:
> mike schmelzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 4. Don't try to tell the system which card to be eth0
> > and which to be eth1 on bootup. I tried all kinds
> > of boot-time options, and they were all ignored.
> > The card with the lower MAC got eth0, end of story.
>
> if you're still using the default stock kernel, then your boot options got
> ignored because the network drivers aren't compiled into the kernel,
> rather, they're compiled as modules. look in /etc/conf.modules to play
> with the aliases and options.
That may not necesarily be the case. I had the same problem, and found the
easiest way (read: the way that worked for me) was to just to live with whatever
name the system gave to the cards, and instead, just change which name gets
assigned which info..I moved my ifconfig lines in the boot scripts and changed
their ethX assignment, and that did the trick.
rick
> --
> Frank Sweetser rasmusin at wpi.edu fsweetser at blee.net | PGP key available
> paramount.ind.wpi.edu RedHat 5.2 kernel 2.2.0 i586 | at public servers
> : But for some things, Perl just isn't the optimal choice.
>
> (yet) :-)
> -- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: Ed Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.redhat
Subject: Re: Help with simple manual network configuration
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 05:11:55 +0000
Robert Montgomery wrote:
>
> This is the info from my provider:
> -------------------------------------------------
> IP address: 24.65.228.72
> subnet mask: 255.255.255.0
> Gateway/Router: 24.65.228.1
> Host: CS123456-A
> NameServer1: 24.64.2.33
> NameServer2: 24:64.2.34
> Domain: cghh1.ab.wave.home.com
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:4B:29:60:F8
> inet addr:24.65.228.72 Bcast:24.65.228.255
> Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:85 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:6 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0
> Interrupt:10 Base address:0xef00
Robert, I'm not an expert in these matters, and everything looks
familiar in your posting, and identical to mine expect for one
detail.. your name servers are on a different network.. 24.64.0.0 from
your gateway/ip 24.65.0.0 .
You probably checked your routing using the command "netstat -nr" or
"route" and you know that you should see something like
0.0.0.0 24.65.228.1 0.0.0.0 UG ... etc.
at the bottom of that display.. is there any routing to your nameservers
in this display? Of course an "arp" command should show the ethernet
address for your gateway, yourself and any other ethernet computers on
your subnet.
Just a thought.. Ed
------------------------------
From: "Richard Hitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Using linux for fax serving
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 10:15:08 -0000
Hi,
I am trying to set up a communications server for fax and email. I am using
qmail for email - but I do not now how serve faxes to the users desktop. I
am using ISDN2, DDI and if possible want a universal (windows 95/98) client
application.
Any suggestions?
Any help greatly appreciated
Richard.
------------------------------
From: Jim Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How do I make domain match my machine?
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 05:43:18 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I have the domain brie.com which is currently virtually hosted elsewhere. I
> now have a 24 hour connection to the net with my linux box with a static ip
> address. My whole objective is to make http://www.brie.com -> 207.212.133.10
>
> What modifications do I need to make to my linux box to do this? Do I need to
> set up dns?
You actually have a couple of options...
The easiest option is to have REQUEST.NET handle your DNS for you
(although I seem to recall a rule at internic that said something about
the nameserver needing to reside on the same subnet). They can just
change the IP in DNS to point to your machine instead.
The next option would be to have PACBELL.NET (your current provider)
handle your DNS for you. They may or may not charge extra for this
although I'd tend to think the former to be true.
The last option is to run the DNS yourself and change your DNS
information with Internic. However, running DNS is no small task if
you've never done it before. The only reasons I can think of for running
your own DNS are:
A. You don't want to pay someone to handle DNS.
B. You don't want PACBELL.NET to know you're running a server.
C. You'd like to know more about DNS and how it works.
The DNS server needs to be up 100% of the time and according to internic
rules, should be on at least two *different* machines with unique I.P
addresses. Of course you can fool internic by binding two addresses to
one NIC in a single machine but that defeats the purpose of a backup DNS
machine.
If you really want to do your own DNS, begin by buying some books on the
subject. I'd recommend an "O'Reilly" book if you can find one. Then
experiment on an internal lan, making sure your setup works correctly
*BEFORE* letting the DNS server out on the internet. I can't stress
enough that the DNS setup must be *CORRECTLY* or you'll end up
propogating junk information out on the net. Beg, borrow or steal
someone, who knows DNS like the back of their hand, to have a look at
your setup before you change the info with internic.
Good luck,
-Jim
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux, Sockets and Java
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 09:40:38 GMT
Hi,
I'm writing a Java Client/Server application. The server resides on a
Linux box running RedHat 5.1. The client runs through a browser or as a
standalone application.
The problem I am having is that I need lots of clients to be able to connect
to the server. The connections are done using socket connections to a port on
the Linux box. However, Either Java or Linux appears to be limiting the
number of connections to approximately 245.
Does anybody know of a way around this?
Any help would be greatly appreciated
Cheers,
Rob.
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Red_Hat setup problems
Date: 01 Feb 1999 23:18:45 +0000
"Aidan Gillis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Having major problems with telneting into a new linux box. Its really
> really slow.
Either the /etc/resolv.conf file on your new Linux machine is
incorrect, or the DNS zone for the calling machine contains no IN PTR
record for it.
--
ACTUALLY reachable as @free-lunch.demon.(whitehouse)co.uk:james+usenet
------------------------------
From: John Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NFS and dynamic IP address
Date: 2 Feb 1999 21:46:52 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>all you need is a steady hostname on the server (or if
>the server has a static ip, who cares what your own ip
>address is.)
>mount srv0:/usr /mnt/usr
But in order for my system to have permission from the
server to mount the filesystems, doesn't the server have
to know the IP address of my machine, which will change
on a regular basis?
John
--
__________________________________________________________________
John Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 723-3669
Center for Radar Astronomy http://nova.stanford.edu/~johnb/
------------------------------
From: "Jean-Fran�ois" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: minicom "killed by signal 11"
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 05:53:05 -0500
Reply-To: "Jean-Fran�ois" <Anonymous Reply>
I have Red Hat linux 5.2 and Minicom 1.82.
When I try to dial using ATDT655-6066, minicom exits as I type the '0' and
gives me a "killed by signal 11' message.
Any idea on how to fix or another small terminal program ?
Jean-Fran�ois
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Scott MacDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Anyone know of good firewall and proxyfor linux?
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 13:36:02 -0600
I am desperately in need of a firewall and proxy for linux, any help would
be greatly appreciated if someone could point me in the right direction!
Thanks
Scott
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.portable,comp.os.linux.setup
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael W. Godfrey)
Subject: Xircom CEM 56 and Thinkpad 600E
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 17:32:59 GMT
Hi,
I have a Thinkpad 600E running Redhat 5.2. I am trying to get the network
card configured correctly but no success so far.
I have the non-cardbus Xircom Realport combo 10/100/56K card (CEM56, yes?).
So far networking and modem work under Win98 and WinNT, and modem works
under Linux using minicom. Can't figure out what is wrong with the
networking. The local Linux techie couldn't figure it out either.
The current state of affairs (my tech support person wrote this) is:
-- The PCMCIA manager (3.0.5) recognizes the card (Xircom CEM 56) and
installs the correct modules.
-- The ethernet driver is properly initialized and recognizes the ethernet
connection (see "Meda 10BaseT, silicon revision 5" messages).
-- ifconfig eth0 shows port 0x300, irq 3 hwaddr 00:10:A4:F6:39:6D
-- Kernel and pcmcia RPM versions are 2.0.36-0.7
-- Trying to ping something on the network results in "lost packets"
although the stats via /proc/interrupts and ifconfig don't change - no
interrupts, TX/RX packets, or framing problems.
Any hints on what might be wrong or needs to be done?
Thanks very much in advance for any help.
-- Mike
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Strange)
Subject: Re: rlogin and .rhosts
Date: 2 Feb 1999 22:48:24 GMT
Try this
in userb account`s .rhosts
userA_machine_name userA_login_id
userA_IP_ADD_here userA_login_id
chmod 600 .rhosts
Rajeev Kumar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Hello Gurus,
: [1]With Linux (2.1.132 kernel running at site) userA cannot rlogin as
: userB without password even if .rhosts has valid entries.
: Whereas on other UNIXes (like solaris, Irix etc it works).
: userA has .rhost enrtry like below.
: + userA -> Should allow rlogin for userA from any UNIX/Linux machine
: on network
: This is happening well in Linux(once I have setup .rhosts
: /etc/hosts.equiv correctly).
: + userB -> Should allow userB to rlogin as userA (without password) ,
: but this is not
: happening, i.e userB will be asked password when he tries to
: rlogin on LINUX machines
: as userA with command like
: userB@unixmachine> rlogin linuxmachine -l userA
: Passwd:
:
: Can anybody gives me any clue here ?????? :-(
: Rajeev
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (if possible please e-mail me also!)
: Thanks in ADVANCE!!
--
While Alcatel may claim ownership of all my ideas (on or off the job),
Alcatel does not claim any responsibility for them. Warranty expired when u
opened this article and I will not be responsible for its contents or use.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Strange)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Strange prob w/telnet
Date: 2 Feb 1999 22:43:55 GMT
Works as designed.
This is a security feature.
Create a user account for yourself on
the target machine. Rlogin/telnet what ever.
su - root make your changes.
There is one file you missed.
James D. McIninch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: We have several machines w/various kinds of Linux on our net and
: one have the following bizarre problem: it does not permit incoming
: telnet connections. Before you jump all over this one:
: I'm not trying to login as root (I don't even get as far as a
: login prompt, attempts to connect simply stall).
: /etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny are empty so any
: connection should be allowed.
: /usr/sbin/in.telnetd is exactly where and what it should be.
: The inetd.conf entry for telnet is:
: telnet stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd in.telnetd
: And, /var/log/secure reports that it is turning away connection
: requests from host "unknown" (despite the fact that the DNS is
: working for the entire network, including, apparently, the
: machine refusing the requests).
: Other incidental information about the troublesome machine:
: RedHat Linux 5.1 w/ kernel 2.0.34 (not 2.0.34-1), using 3com
: PCMCIA ethernet (3c574).
: Any ideas?
--
While Alcatel may claim ownership of all my ideas (on or off the job),
Alcatel does not claim any responsibility for them. Warranty expired when u
opened this article and I will not be responsible for its contents or use.
------------------------------
From: "Arthur P. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.misc,comp.sys.sun.admin,comp.sys.sun.misc,comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Help: FTP hang Solaris 2.6->Redhat 5.2
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 17:59:47 -0500
I'm experiencing a problem with FTP regularly hanging going from a
series of Solaris 2.6
boxes (and even one 2.5, but not a machine running Solaris 7, at least
so far) to a server
running Linux RedHat 5.2, with the wu-ftpd (2.4.2 beta 18).
The ftp session always starts ok, but if I run an mget to get a bunch of
files, I can get
maybe 1- 2 dozen (the number varies a lot) and then it hangs getting one
of the files.
The hang is at least 2 minutes long (generally the files take only
seconds to transfer) and it does
not recover while I wait. If I hit Ctrl-C it looks like the entire file
did transfer, but it was waiting
for something to finish or close?
Please send me email if you have any clues- I'm not sure when I'll get
a chance to check the
newsgroup again. I did look through Deja News and found nothing. Thanks,
Arthur Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: "Rudy Folden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Recognizing the Sohoware Ethernet Network Card
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 15:08:36 -0800
I had the same problem. I tried using the PnP stuff and never got it to
work.
Instead, I saved the SOHO card for my Windows machines and bought a cheapie
NE compatible card from this used computer parts place and it all runs fine.
The cost is cheap if you look for the old NON-Plug N Play ones, which Linux
wants.
Nolan Louie wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi Linux-Gurus!
>
>I'm new with Linux, totally frustrated with this situation, and I hope
>somebody
>can help.
>
>I've searched high and low for solutions to getting RedHat Linux to
>recognize
>my NDC SOHOware Ethernet network card in my box but can't seem to get
>anything.
>The NDC people recommend looking on web but it seems like most drivers out
>there
>are for big name network cards like Intel, 3Com, etc...
>
>Any ideas what I can do? ANY help is appreciated!
>
>
>Nolan
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Byte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: settings for internet use
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 00:22:32 -0800
i have just installed red hat 5.2 for the first time so i could learn a new
operating system ( i already know nt server, workstation, win 95, win 98,
win 3.1, win 3.11 and several versions of dos.). but this linux really has
got me stuck. ( don't get me wrong i REALLY like it!!!!!!)
i am trying to set up my dial up for the net but just can't seem to get the
settings right ( have no idea what i am doing) is there anyone that can give
a guy a hand in this?
if so please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thankyou in advance
------------------------------
From: "Juha Lehtonen" <juha.lehtonen@#%�%�#%.#�#>
Subject: PPPD connection hangs-up ( SIGHUP)
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 13:47:05 +0200
Hi
I have Zyxel ISDN (external) and linux 2.0.35 (SuSE 5.3) as server
and Win98 as client. When the server is connected to my ISP
by PPPD the connection seems to work fine. However, occasionally
the pppd hangs-up the modem (SIGHUP) eventhough I am actively
using the net. ( So it is most probably not time-out problem ).
The problem seems to take place when I make an WWW connections
from the client ( not always however ). First the browser freezes ( no
data coming from the internet ) and soon the connection hangs up.
This could happen even if I am downloading something from the
internet with FTP on the server at the same time.
I use masquerading and I have also tested it with squid.
Juha Lehtonen
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: network card
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 11:36:42 GMT
I installed linux ver 5.0 form a red hat CD .I am using a rl2000 compex
network card which NE2000 compatible and should work with Linux the problem
is i can`t set it up so that Linux can see it or use it , the Kernel version
if 2.1.76 can anyone help me.
Blessing K. Sagonda
Networks
Ok Zimbabwe
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Rudy Folden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: GTE, DSL and Linux
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 15:11:53 -0800
Go to dynip.com .
Ben Frazier wrote in message ...
>
>On Mon, 1 Feb 1999 14:06:35 -0500, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rambled about:
>>
>>The only thing I dislike about GTE's service is the lack of static IPs.
>>I wanted to move my family's website to a machine I can directly control.
>>Can you run web services via dynamic IPs? Is the assigned IP changed if
>>the machine is never rebooted? (hey, it is a linux box!)
>>
>>
>>The only annoying thing so far (other than dynamic IPs) is that they can't
>>use my pre-existing GTE account information (email address, etc). Oh
>>well, I was getting a lot of spam on that address anyways.... *laughs!*
>
>Jason,
>
>You can have a static hostname name and domain name with a dynamic IP by
>using a Dynamic service such as ml.org. Well crap, I just checked out
>their home page and they've shut it down.
>
>There is somebody else providing this type of service, but I cannot
>remember who right now.
>
>But it IS possible!
>
>--
>ranger at chariott.com Ben Frazier ICQ# 1590690
>http://members.chariott.com/~ranger
> "There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
> We don't believe this to be a coincidence." - Jeremy S. Anderson
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mohd H Misnan)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Any driver for Xircom Cardbus Ethernet 10/100 + modem 56 ?
Date: 2 Feb 1999 13:32:17 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hugo Croonenborghs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>Very short : Is there a driver for this 32 bit card ?
>
>If yes, where to find it ?
>If no, is there another way (without buying another card) ?
get the latest pcmcia-cs-8, I think it should be supported by
now tho' as the BUGS mentioned, no resume has yet be implemented
for cardbus card.
--
| Mohd H Misnan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] + [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] + [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/3319/ : Disclaimer? |
| Linux RH5.2 on AMD K6-2/300Mhz notebook + 64Meg RAM + 3Gig HD |
------------------------------
From: "G.H. Associates Ltd, Manchester, UK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Specialix
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 11:57:01 -0000
Hi,
Does anybody know of any linux software allowing you to use a Specialix card
and block, thus allowing you to attach terminals to a machine?
Help would be much appreciated!
Cheers,
-Rick-
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
