Linux-Networking Digest #100, Volume #11         Mon, 10 May 99 06:13:43 EDT

Contents:
  Re: File permission for group (Robert Nichols)
  SOHOware Fast PCI Adapter from NDC ("Jindong (JD) Chen")
  could anyone help me with d-link de660 ethernet card? ("tony")
  Re: no pingies in very simple network ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: restarting network services... continued ("Lee Sharp")
  nntp howto (Haaino Beljaars)
  Re: Newbie humble Q: can't run autoboot.bat at D:\ (Tom Martinson)
  IP Aliasing and Firewall Rules (Martin Ng)
  Re: PLIP (Dick Repasky)
  Win95 to Redhat to Win95 (Paul Beebe)
  SMC EZ PCI ("DiscoStu")
  Re: PLIP (Barry Hill)
  Re: VPN over IP Masqurade???? (Luca Filipozzi)
  Re: PCI modems in linux? ("C. E. Scheetz")
  Help! I need everyone's input on a new router ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: IP Masquerade advantages (mist)
  Re: hosts.allow / hosts.deny (mist)
  Re: Reliable (!) nic for 2.2 kernel? (Roope Anttinen)
  dhcpd question.. (Bill Dossett)
  Re: hosts.allow / hosts.deny (Chris Rankin)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Nichols)
Subject: Re: File permission for group
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 17:45:04 GMT

Note: E-mailed *and* posted.

In article <cUGX2.381$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tetzschner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:I have a Redhat 5.2 setup for server in a windows network.
:I got to windows users called User1 and User2.
:Both User1 and User2 got there home dir. on the LinuxServer without any
:problems.
:Then I created a folder called /home/public....
:created a Group called Gruppe1 with the members: User1 and User2
:I used chown -R .Gruppe1 . (in /home/public)
:then chmod -R go=rwx . (still in /home/public)
:And then i could create folders from User1 and User2
:Great .... :-)... but
:I cant create folders i folder created by the other user...... what do I do
:wrong ??????

There are a couple of other things you need to do:

 1. Run the command "chmod g+s /home/public" to set the SGID bit on the
    directory.  Once that is done any new files and subdirectories will
    inherit the GID of the parent directory.  For any existing
    subdirectories, either change them the same way or just run the
    command
             
       find /home/public -type d -exec chmod g+s {} \;

    to change them all.

 2. You'll need to be sure that all members of the group work with their
    umask set to give group write permission to files and directories
    they create.

 3. Fix up stuff that already exists under /home/public by running the
    command

       find /home/public -exec chmod g+w {} \; -exec chown .Gruppe1 {} \;

Once you've got all that set up the situation should take care of
itself.

-- 
Bob Nichols         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP public key 1024/9A9C7955
Key fingerprint = 2F E5 82 F8 5D 06 A2 59  20 65 44 68 87 EC A7 D7

------------------------------

From: "Jindong (JD) Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SOHOware Fast PCI Adapter from NDC
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 06:31:22 GMT

Hi,

Is there a driver for SOHOware Fast PCI Fast Ethernet Adapter from NDC
Communications, INC.

If yes, would you please where I can get it?

Thanks a lot in advance

JD



------------------------------

From: "tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: could anyone help me with d-link de660 ethernet card?
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 12:52:07 +0800

could anyone help me with d-link de660 ethernet card?

I install redhat 5.2 in my computer,what should i do
to let my network card work?

[situation]

when I press "lsmod"

Module        Pages   used by
pcnet_cs        2        0
ds              2     [pcnet_cs]  2
i82365          5        2
pcmcia_core     9     [pcnet_cs  ds  i82365]  0
does it mean that the module work properly?


then I press "cardctl config"

socket 0:
 not configured
socket 1:
 Interface type is memory and I/O
 IRQ 3 is exclusive, level mode, enabled
 Fuction 0:
   config register base =0x0400
     option = 0x60, status=0000, copy=0000
   I/O window1 :0x0320 to 0x032f, 8 bit
   I/O window2 :0x0330 to 0x033f, 16 bit
does it mean any message I should know?


but there is something i don't understand
that when i press "dmesg"

Linux PCMCIA Card Services 3.0.5
  kernel build:2.0.36 unknown
.......
Intel PCIC probe:
  Cirrus PD6729 PCI at port 0x3e0 ofs 0x00, 2 sockets
.......
  ISA irqs (default) =3,4,5,7,9,10,11,12 status change on irq 11
...
...
...
  eth0:NE2000 Compatible:port 0x320,irq 3,hw_addr 00:80:C8:86:74:8D
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
does id mean it found an ethernet card?

but when I press"ifconfig"
it doesn't have eth0 this item,only have lo this item?

So what should exactly do to let my network wrok?
In dos prompt,I use utility to test my card
It shows IRQ=11 IO=0x300 Hardware address as the same above

PS:Could anyone tall me what exctly should I do
,cause I have read Pcmcia HOWTO for many times.
But I still can't get it work?



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: no pingies in very simple network
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 06:32:32 GMT

In article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  Rob van der Putten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there
>
> On Fri, 7 May 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Problem solved! After swichting off PNP, manually configuring
Windows, I
> > reserved IRQ 10 in the BIOS for legacy ISA. Fired up Linux and it
worked.
>
> This is something one should ALWAYS do.
> I (and probably most of us) asumed that you did. After all, it's part
of

Yes, you're quite right, but you know what they say about 'assume'.
Makes an ASS of U and ME.
Thanks again for your help.
Dennis
> switching off PnP.
>
> Regards,
> Rob
>
>
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-+
> |              http://www.sput.webster.nl/spam-policy.html
|
>
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-+
>
>


--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---

------------------------------

From: "Lee Sharp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: restarting network services... continued
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 14:49:11 -0500

Chris Snyder wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...

|Maybe I don't have a handle on all this but when I issue the command
|"samba stop" while in the /etc/rc.d/init.d directory bash comes back
|with "samba command not found".
|Also, suppose that perhaps samba is not the only service that I wish to
|restart. Is there a command that will rescan initd and get the whole
|ball rolling over again?

   My samba script is in /usr/sbin, but yours may be different.  If you are
in the directory, and it is not in your path, you have to type "./samba
restart" not "samba restart" or it will not find it.  I know it is odd...
./ means right-here in linux.  You can put "." in your path and avoid this,
but it can be dangerous if you are in root.

            Lee

--
SCSI is *NOT* magic. There are *fundamental technical reasons* why it is
necessary to sacrifice a young goat to your SCSI chain now and then. *
Black holes are where God divided by zero. - I am speaking as an individual,
not as a representative of any company, organization or other entity.  I am
solely responsible for my words.





------------------------------

From: Haaino Beljaars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: nntp howto
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 09:55:41 +0200

Hi,

Can anybody tell me where I can find a page about setting up a nntp
server. Please mail me and not the newsgroup.

Greetings from Haaino Beljaars

Home Page:      HTTP://www.phys.uu.nl/~beljaars/ 

I am pro Open Source Software

When all else fails, read the manual. 



------------------------------

From: Tom Martinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Newbie humble Q: can't run autoboot.bat at D:\
Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 23:25:58 -0500

I would guess that you are not able to access the CD-Rom from your Dos Prompt.
What you need to do is to make a boot floppy for your Windows Machine (Dos boot
floppy) and either install MSCDEX.EXE onto the machine or Boot from the Floppy
and have MSCDEX.EXE configured on the floppy.  I am sorry that I can't help you
more but I have long since given up the MS world.

Tom Martinson

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Hi Group,
>     I hope somebody can point me to a better place if this is not the
> appropriated ng to discauss this question.
>
>      I got the redhat linux 5.2 installation guide with the free CD from
> linuxmall.com.  Soon I realized that I need the boot discatte, or run autoboot
> at cd-rom.  However, at dos prompt the machine can't recognize d drive.  I
> suppose I need some driver.  However this is school's box I'm messing around
> with.  I have absolutely no idea where to start.
>
>   I suppose I can get a bootdisk from a new linux distro (openLinux2.2 is
> cheap) or get a linux 5.2 box from ebay.  Any other recommendation?  Any
> program that can format a floppy disk in linux format and make a linux
> bootdisk from the dos prompt?
>
>      Any input is greatly apprecated.
>
>                          CY
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own


------------------------------

From: Martin Ng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP Aliasing and Firewall Rules
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 15:04:00 +0800

Hi,

I set up a firewall with only one ethernet card. I want the firewall
listen on two ip from outside, 202.64.xx.yy and 202.64.xx.zz.
I don't know how to write firewall rules with ipfwadm in that
situation.  Is it true that I can reference the interface card as eth0,
eth0:0 & eth0:1?

Martin

>ifconfig
lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Bcast:127.255.255.255  Mask:255.0.0.0
          UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:3584  Metric:1
          RX packets:18 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:18 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0

eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:00:21:C7:99:6E
          inet addr:202.64.xx.yy  Bcast:202.64.66.224
Mask:255.255.255.224
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:16493 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:4995 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0
          Interrupt:10 Base address:0xdc00

eth0:0    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:00:21:C7:99:6E
          inet addr:192.168.1.1  Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP RUNNING  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0

eth0:1    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:00:21:C7:99:6E
      inet addr:202.64.xx.zz  Mask:255.255.255.224
          UP RUNNING  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:1 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dick Repasky)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PLIP
Date: 9 May 1999 22:59:29 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Sun, 09 May 1999 03:04:38 GMT, Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a laptop w/o a CDROM or Ethernet card and I am trying to do an
>install via the PLIP protocol.  I am trying to install Redhat Linux 5.2
>and have another Redhat machine hooked up and running, but the PLIP
>interface(s) don't seem to be working.  I am using a Symantec PC
>Anywhere cable to connect the two machines.  Both machines seem to
>initialize the interface properly, but won't communicate with each
>other.  Can anyone help?
>

I've installed RH 5.2 via plip, with just a little difficulty.  You'll
need to provide more information if anyone is to help you.  Did you use
the RH control panel on the machine that is already running linux?  
What values did you put in?  Most importantly did  you provide a
value for the network mask, or did the control panel fill it in? If
the control panel filled it in, did it fill in a correct value? (You can
check the value against that in the networking howto and in the PLIP mini
howto.) A friend told me that the control-panel rarely fills in the correct
network mask, and he was right for my installation.  

So, without other information, I'd suggest checking the network mask against

those in the HOWTO's.

Dick



-- 

Remove the underscore from my e-mail address to reply by mail.

------------------------------

From: Paul Beebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Win95 to Redhat to Win95
Date: 5 May 1999 14:32:32 GMT

I have been presented with a problem...

The company I work for wants me to configure our new server so that 
someone with win95 can dial in and login, the machine then calls them back 
and establishes the connection.

The problem I am having is that the dialup server with win95 does not 
answer the modem, it just monitors it.  Also, do i need any special send 
expect scripts?

==================  Posted via SearchLinux  ==================
                  http://www.searchlinux.com

------------------------------

From: "DiscoStu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SMC EZ PCI
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 07:13:07 GMT

Ok I have Two Nics in my machine. A Realtek 8029 which runs fine under Linux
and a SMC EZ Card PCI 10 which doesn't. Redhat 6 does not recognized the SMC
card at all, and if I configure it manually by setting the IRQ and IN/OUT
parameters It fails to start when the kernal is restarted. I've tried both
the SMC Ultra and the SMC 8519 (or somthing like that) drivers and neither
seem to work.

Can anyone help???

    thanks
        Shawn



------------------------------

From: Barry Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PLIP
Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 23:02:14 GMT

Hi,

I got PLIP working with my 386/20 laptop (the install failed because the
HDD was too small - 60MB).

Although I can=B4t help your specific case, the FAQ helped me a lot:

http://www.cli.di.unipi.it/~controzz/PLIP-Mini-HOWTO.html.tar.gz



Best of luck,

Barry


Nick wrote:
> =

> I have a laptop w/o a CDROM or Ethernet card and I am trying to do an
> install via the PLIP protocol.  I am trying to install Redhat Linux 5.2=

> and have another Redhat machine hooked up and running, but the PLIP
> interface(s) don't seem to be working.  I am using a Symantec PC
> Anywhere cable to connect the two machines.  Both machines seem to
> initialize the interface properly, but won't communicate with each
> other.  Can anyone help?
> =

> --Nick

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Subject: Re: VPN over IP Masqurade????
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 13:57:04 -0700

[This followup was posted to comp.os.linux.networking and a copy was sent 
to the cited author.]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
says...
> Can you do it?
> 
> I asked this about a week ago, and my message is gone!  This is a very
> active list.  Sorry if I missed the answer. :o(
> 
> Tony
> 
> 
> 
Check John Hardin's web site:
ftp://ftp.rubyriver.com/pub/jhardin/masquerade/ip_masq_vpn.html

It'll answer all your questions, i think.
-- 
Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

------------------------------

From: "C. E. Scheetz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PCI modems in linux?
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 04:25:21 +0000

PlatoAtAccesswestDotCom wrote:

> Richard Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >We do have a PCI modem that is NOT a "Win" modem, it is controller based,
> >and uses the Lucent Venus chipset.
>
> The info on your company home page does NOT support you assertion.
> Give us a link to info that DOES support you assertion.

I am replying to this because this is also an interest of mine - the
information below is lifted from
http://www.lucent.com/micro/dsp/k56prod.html.  As you can see, it lists 5
chipsets - and only one of them is a "softmodem" or controllerless modem.
The other 4 have controllers (I am assuming so; let me know if I'm wrong on
this so I don't persue it further) but were still marketed as "Winmodems"
because they had no intention of supporting drivers for anything but Win9x.
So could this mean that many fully chipped PCI modems were marketed as
Win-modems because they didn't offer an OS2 driver?  My RedHat 5.2  /proc/pci
reads this chip off of the bus as stating that it has a L56xMF chipset.

So hard is it going to be to get these modems to work under linux?

          V.90/K56flex Modem Chip Sets-Features by Product
                                                  Family

                                             Product

                                             L56xAF
                                             L56xVS
                                             L56RV
                                             L56xMF
                                             L56XT**

                       *Optional.
                       **Soft modem.

                       Top of Page

Chris Scheetz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help! I need everyone's input on a new router
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 06:36:11 GMT

I am a student working on a Marketing Research report and need input on
a cheap home use/small business (linux based) router that is currently
being developed. If anyone can fill out my survey, I would be very
grateful. The survey is posted at http://www.internetgrp.com/survey/

Thanks again!!


--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---

------------------------------

From: mist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP Masquerade advantages
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 10:37:06 +0100
Reply-To: mist <new$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

DB7654321 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that -
>What are the advantages of using IP masquerading compared to assigning IP
>addresses to every computer on the network?
>

You miss the point.  The idea of IP masquerading is to allow the LAN to
use a connection through just one computer.   You'll still have to
assign IP addresses to the other computers on the network, but rather
than use "real" IP addresses, you would use internal IP addresses, such
as 192.168.*.*.

The difference is that the "masquerading" box, with a "real" IP address
will be able to communicate with the outside world, because other
computers on the internet will know where to find it through DNS.  The
other computers wont, and therefore you need the masquerading.
(Masquerading makes it look as though the machines on the internal
network are in fact using the IP addy of the masquerading box.)

So, the *real* advantage is that you don't have to purchase the ip block
from InterNIC, thereby saving you cash.


-- 
Mist.

------------------------------

From: mist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: hosts.allow / hosts.deny
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 10:43:55 +0100
Reply-To: mist <new$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

R. Christopher Harshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that
-
>We're using TCP wrappers, and hosts.allow/deny.  Correct me if I'm
>wrong,
>but this system uses allow and then deny, yes?  

Yup.

>We run a fairly open
>(academic)
>system, but there's one particular pest who has compromised a
>bewildering
>number of accounts, and always comes in from three domains (two look
>like
>dialups, the third I don't know, but they're all Argentina).  Is there
>no way I
>can allow all incoming connections *except* those from .AR and
>SATLINK.COM?

Well, you could I suppose leave hosts.allow empty then in hosts.deny put

ALL .satlink.com
ALL .ar

or you could put in hosts.allow

ALL : ALL EXCEPT .satlink.com .ar

then put in hosts.deny

ALL : ALL

>As in, check hosts.deny first, before checking allow (which would then
>read ALL,

Hmm.   I think the above manages to avoid re-writing the source.  8-)


Perhaps you could use a firewall as well?
-- 
Mist.

------------------------------

From: Roope Anttinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Reliable (!) nic for 2.2 kernel?
Date: 10 May 1999 09:50:56 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In comp.os.linux.development.system bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my tulip card is totally unreliable.  I can bring it down with an ftp
> xfer (local lan) at 10 or 100, in a minute or less.  network hangs and
> will NOT be reset by software.

That's weird. One of the servers I administer has a tulip card and the
server has been up now for 178 days without any problems. Here's some
numbers:

RX packets:104749300 errors:0 dropped:13 overruns:0
TX packets:71530160 errors:4 dropped:0 overruns:4

cat /proc/pci reports the card as DEC DC21140 (rev 32).

Roope

        
-- 
MicroSoft? is that some kind of a toilet paper?
PS: Look for address here, not from headers. And remove NOSPAM's
___________________________________________________________________________
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        +358 9 812 7567  /  +358 500 445 565  /  +358 49 445 565
                http://myy.helia.fi/~anttiner/index.html
===========================================================================
   Helsinki Business Polytechnic - Institute of information technology

------------------------------

From: Bill Dossett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dhcpd question..
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 10:46:05 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi,

I'm running dhcpd supplied with Red Hat Linux 5.2.

I have fixed address statements for all the normal
hosts that are on my network on a daily basis.

We build machines for customers and bring them up
on the network and they normally get a 24 hour lease.

Sometimes when a users is away for a week and he comes
back, his fixed address has been given to a machine that
we have built and is running on the network temporarily.

I am not sure about this bit... I've supplied the fixed
addresses from within the range statement in my dhcpd.conf.
I think the first example I saw did this.... is it perhaps
wrong?  Should I reduce the range and supply fixed address
systems from outside of the range.... or else why does dhcpd
give away my fixed addresses?

Thanks for any info, pointers or whatever...

Bill
--
public key -> http://www.bill.co.uk/pubkey.html

------------------------------

From: Chris Rankin <au.zipworld.com@{no.spam}rankinc>
Subject: Re: hosts.allow / hosts.deny
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 19:15:19 +1000

"R. Christopher Harshman" wrote:
> Is there no way I can allow all incoming connections *except* those from .AR and
> SATLINK.COM?

hosts.allow:
ALL: ALL EXCEPT .ar .satlink.com

hosts.deny:
ALL: ALL

Something like the above will probably do the trick. You could also try
complaining to this person's ISP and installing a firewall.

Cheers,
Chris.

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to