Linux-Networking Digest #100, Volume #12 Tue, 3 Aug 99 23:13:41 EDT
Contents:
Re: PPP Server Problem - no "outside" IP access ("Charles Stack")
Re: Telnet on Second NIC ("Charles Stack")
Re: sendmail configuration ? (Chip Transisto)
PPP problems (Joe Bowman)
Re: Samba Shares Folders I Didn't Set in smb.conf (Ben W.)
Re: integrated ethernet on docking station (Daniel Walker)
Re: Setup for LAN with cable modem -- Please help! (Chip Transisto)
Re: Help: basic NFS (Frank Hahn)
Re: Linux Printing to a Remote Printer (Frank Hahn)
Re: Need Help on WVDial (Michel Catudal)
Re: Can't ping another computer in the lan
Re: kppp (jim holder)
kppp dconnecting to NT server ("g.beretta")
Re: Web Based Linux Management (Norman Levin)
Re: Will a router work to share 1 IP ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
KTI PE-520 Plus ethernet card problem (Judy Hawkins)
Samba printing (Richard Mann)
Re: Need some help networking with RH 6.0 ("Charles Ghent")
Re: Cannot ping - all the gory details on problem (Monte Phillips)
virtualhosts for ftpd? (Zoltan Nemeth)
uugetty - can't get RINGBACK to work ("Santiago Fisher")
Re: Problems with Apache (Joey Morris)
DFE-530TX D-Link NIC ("Tom")
Re: Firewall won't let me see ISP (Allen Wong)
Re: Question about IPCHAINS HOWTO - IP Spoofing ("TURBO1010")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Charles Stack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP Server Problem - no "outside" IP access
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 00:20:47 GMT
Do you have defaultroute among your ppp options?
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am trying to setup a PPP server on my Linux (2.2) machine to allow me
> to dial-in and use the internet.
>
> I am using mgetty to enable dial-in. I am using the AutoPPP option to
> start pppd when the modem connects. That all seems to work fine.
> However, I can only ping the PPP server, but NOTHING else.
>
> I have the proxyarp option set in /etc/ppp/options, so I think it should
> be proxying IP addresses for the ppp0 device.
>
> I've read the FAQs and HOWTOs, but it doesn't seems to address this
> problem. Any help would be great.
>
> Thanks in advance.
------------------------------
From: "Charles Stack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Telnet on Second NIC
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 00:25:45 GMT
Are both cards on the same network? I encountered a problem with two NICS
with both on the same network. While both had their own IP addresses, only
the default route was being recognized and used. As soon as I place the
second NIC on another network, everything started working fine.
Trevor Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7o7uvj$d25$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The hosts.allow was empty (as was the hosts.deny) since this is a pretty
new
> server. However, when logged into the server, I can telnet to my outside
> card (198.165.xxx.xxx) but when I try to telnet to my inside card
10.x.x.x,
> I get the Escape character is ^] and that's as far as it goes. I don't
get
> a login: prompt and have to end the session with ^].
>
> Is there any way that the card may not be initialized for inet services?
I
> can ping it locally and from the rest of my network. I can ping out
through
> it to other servers. Curious.
>
> Thanks Again,
> Trevor
>
>
> Andrey Smirnov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:7o7hoj$m75$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hello,
> >
> > Telnet is not listenning on IP addresses it's doing it on port.
> >
> > Check your configuration file /etc/hosts.allow to see if you allow hosts
> > from your internal network to login via telnet.
> >
> > Good luck!
> >
> > Trevor Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:7o7fgj$7tl$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Hi Folks,
> > >
> > > I'm running RH6.0 and had it set up fine with one NIC. This has a
real
> IP
> > > and I can telnet to it no problem.
> > >
> > > I've added a second NIC and put it on my internal network. It works
> fine
> > > (can ping all around through it and can ping it from other wkstns) but
> it
> > > seems like telnet isn't listening on that IP. Is this possible?
Again,
> I
> > > can telnet to one, but not to the other.
> > >
> > > Suggestions?
> > > Thanks,
> > > Trevor
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chip Transisto)
Subject: Re: sendmail configuration ?
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 21:29:07 GMT
Reply-To: Chip Transisto
in /etc/mail/access add "162.168.1.4 RELAY"
On Sat, 31 Jul 1999 03:26:36 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tykq) wrote:
>Hi
>I ve been experimenting with linux and i ran into a problem !
>I have RH 6.0 on one PC and Win3.1 on an old 386 both running tcp/ip.
>The ip of linux box is 192.168.1.1 and the 386 is 192.168.1.4 and pop3
>is runing on Linux box.
>I'm trying to read mail from the 386 using MS internet mail setting
>the linuxbox as the pop3 server.
>The maillog reads:
>ipop3 : port 110 service from 192.168.1.4 login user=myname
>host=[192.168.1.4] nmsgs=1/1
>ipop3: connection refused while reading user=myname,host=[192.168.1.4]
>
>If i try to send mail to any user, i have
> relay=[192.168.1.4] reject ,Relaying denied
>
>Ive tried to use Linuxconf to add a Relay for, by IP to 192.168.1.4
>but no result.
>
>Should i add any thing to sendmail.cf . There is a line in this file
>which will permit relaying /etc/mail/relay-domains. I dont have this
>file
>Help
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Joe Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PPP problems
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 20:01:00 -0500
Hello folks. After seeing my problem posted in several other messages, I
thought to myself "Aha, I'm in luck. A solution!". Unfortunately, this
doesn't seem to be the case. The error I'm getting when I try to dial
into my ISP is:
"LCP: timeout sending Config-requests"
I have tried removing ayncmap from my options file.
I have tried modifying my chatscript file to use '\d\c' in response to
connect.
I have tried adding 'passive' to my options file to set pppd into
passive mode.
I have tried disabling every compression option pppd has a listing for.
I have tried adding @ppp to my username.
I enabled kernel-level logging of ppp, and after the modem connects, the
only thing that happens is the LCP Config-request packet gets sent out
10 times, and then times out.
When I dial in using minicom, I get the 'CONNECT' message, and then
nothing is transmitted. I am using an external Zoom 56k Dual-modem
modem, which works and connects perfectly to my ISP under Windows.
Does anyone have any other suggestions that might lead to a solution? Or
has someone else had this problem, and figured out how to fix it? I'm
rather anxious to get my linux box connecting to the 'net again. :)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben W.)
Subject: Re: Samba Shares Folders I Didn't Set in smb.conf
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 01:24:25 GMT
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999 19:56:26 GMT, "Jan Johansson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "chmod"ing the /tmp folder to 700, can I configure Samba to share only
>> the folders I specify in smb.conf, not folders that have chmods of
>> 777?
>
>
>Thats the way it works, samba doesnt share ANYTHING you dont tell it, check
>out your smb.conf the share must be in there (its there by default)
>
>
Hmm...It would seem, from running "testparm" that Samba wants a public
directory. When it cannot find one, even if the "public" section in
smb.conf is absent, Samba makes /tmp the public directory.
Ben
------------------------------
From: Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: integrated ethernet on docking station
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 21:33:28 GMT
I guess you didn't read far enough to see my actual question. I know the
unit will run linux, and was simply soliciting advice on a distribution.
I was ASKING if the mini-docking station's integrated ethernet was
supported by Linux. I've already called Gateway, read all the associated
HOWTO's and FAQs, and thought perhaps this would be a worthwhile
question to ask. Either you didn't read past "newbie," or you didn't
know the answer to my question, but you're evidently much more
intelligent than me, so thanks for "using your head" and replying to my
request.
Monte Phillips wrote:
> Lets see you just bought a new computer, a Gateway,ok. Has it dawned
> on you to perhaps call GATEWAY? They ship linuxboxes, ask them if
> that unit can run linux and what flavor. Tell you what, if you use
> your head so little on this thing, perhaps linux wouldn't be the thing
> for you.
>
> Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Another note -- I haven't picked a distribution yet. Any suggestions? I
> >had a good eight months of end-user-type UNIX experience, but that was a
> >few years back, so I'm somewhat rusty. Also, I've got two weeks to get
> >things up and running before school starts, and at that time the Win98
> >partition will be considered "mission critical"; i.e., it's required for
> >engineering classes.
> >> I'm a total linux newbie, and was unable to find any information on
> >> this specific topic, even on a webpage devoted to linux on this
> >> particular laptop model.
>
> >> System: Gateway Solo 2500 (arrives tomorrow)
>
> >> I opted for the "mini-docking station" option when I ordered; this
> >> advertises "integrated ethernet." Since I wasn't planning on installing
> >> linux at the time I ordered the system, I figured this would be just
> >> fine.
> >>
> >> My question is this, for anyone who might know: What is the nature of
> >> this "integrated ethernet?" How does the system interface with it?
> >> (serial, PCMCIA, etc.) And, if anyone knows, is there any way to get
> >> linux to recognize it? am i gonna have to plunk down for a PCMCIA NIC?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chip Transisto)
Subject: Re: Setup for LAN with cable modem -- Please help!
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 21:59:11 GMT
Reply-To: Chip Transisto
set it up in control-panel in X. Set it to DHCP, make sure there is
no gateway and no gateway device.
On Tue, 03 Aug 1999 09:47:41 -0500, Weifan Lin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I used to have an LAN with modem connecting to my ISP. Recently, I
>switched it to cable modem
>and tried to setup my linux box. Right now, my two networking cards are
>working; eth0 is
>for my LAN and eth1 for the cable modem. I am using RH5.2 and @home gave
>me a static IP.
>Can someone please tell me how to setup the eth1 to make it work?
>
>Thanks.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Hahn)
Subject: Re: Help: basic NFS
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 00:43:53 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 02 Aug 1999 13:36:11 GMT, Peter Camenzind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I did try the hostname specifier and that didn't work either.
>
Are the following running on the Linux machine:
rpc.mountd
rpc.nfsd
rpc.portmap
--
Frank Hahn
There can be no twisted thought without a twisted molecule.
-- R. W. Gerard
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Hahn)
Subject: Re: Linux Printing to a Remote Printer
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 00:43:53 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 02 Aug 1999 15:17:22 +0100, Alexander Atkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I am having trouble getting Linux to print to a remote printer.
>The remote printer is also on Linux with Aps Filter and Ghostscript.
>Both machines are running Slackware 4.0.
>
>Please start from the basics because I know nothing about Linux
>printing.
>
Well, if that is the case, then you need to dig out the Printing
How-To and read through it. If you can't find it on your CD or
you don't have a CD, try doing a search of Yahoo or any other
Internet search engine, there are plenty out there.
If the Printing How-To does not answer your question, try searching
http://www.deja.com.
--
Frank Hahn
If today is the first day of the rest of your life, what the hell was
yesterday?
------------------------------
From: Michel Catudal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Need Help on WVDial
Date: 3 Aug 1999 20:33:12 -0500
biabi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have just setup my internet dialup using wvdial-1.20-38 from SuSE-6.1
> distro. Everything works just find, except after I terminated the
> wvdial and tried to use kppp, it said modem is in used. Does anyone
> have any idea how to fix this problem?
I think that you have to choose one or the other. Anyhow once
someone has used wvdial I don't understand how he would want to
use kppp.
--
use OS/2 for a crash proof work environment
use Linux for safe and quick internet access
use Winblows to test the latest viruses
http://www.netonecom.net/~bbcat/
We have software, food, music, news, search,
history, electronics and genealogy pages.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Subject: Re: Can't ping another computer in the lan
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 22:42:08 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999 08:10:38 -0400, Mike Kokinda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:Can you ping the individual machines from themselves? By IP address? By
:localhost?
:
:Start with the machine(s) itself then move to the network.
:
:Mike Kokinda
:
:
I can ping myself though ethernet card's interface on bith machines,
both of them can ping localhost.
--
|====================================|
|=> op_nemon <==> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <=|
|====================================|
------------------------------
From: jim holder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: kppp
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 20:27:51 -0400
Starbuks1o wrote:
> Hi all-
>
> I just started using linux, and was trying to set it up so that i could connect
> to the internet. I found the program kppp in Gnome. When it asked for my modem
> (my modem is at com3 under windows,) i tried using /dev/modem, /dev/ttys2, and
> /dev/cua2 ....i also tried several others, and none of them could connect.
>
> I am using a 56k modem, and am using redhat 6 on an intel pentium 2 400mhz with
> 64megs of ram...
>
> thanks,
> scott taylor
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uh, this might be the wrong time to find out, but you can't use linux to connect
to AOL servers. But anwway...is your modem pnp or a winmodem?
-jim
------------------------------
From: "g.beretta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kppp dconnecting to NT server
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 01:54:14 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My ISP has a NT server. I am running RedHat6. Dialing by kppp is ok,
but I cannot receive the authentication after the connection and I get a
timeout. All what is reported by the log is that pppd has went down on
signal 15. The authentication by my side is configured as PAP.
What the hell my ISP's NT server is waiting for ?
Who has experienced pppd dial-up connection to an NT server?
Thanks
Giorgio
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 21:27:39 -0400
From: Norman Levin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.security
Subject: Re: Web Based Linux Management
The "linuxconf" tool can be web enabled - according to the RedHat install
manual.
--
Norman Levin
vm/dynAmIX inc.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: redhat.servers.general
Subject: Re: Will a router work to share 1 IP
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 01:51:57 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So my question is can
> I take a linux box turn it into a router and connect all my computers
to
> the one IP address? And if not is there anyway I can do it?
Yes, check out one of the linux how-to sites like
http://www.linux-howto.com/
You'll want firewalling & IP masquerading:
http://www.linux-howto.com/LDP/HOWTO/Firewall-HOWTO.html
http://www.linux-howto.com/LDP/HOWTO/mini/IP-Masquerade.html
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Judy Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: KTI PE-520 Plus ethernet card problem
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 01:54:15 GMT
I have a KTI PE-520 Plus PCMCIA ethernet card in my Toshiba laptop,
which is running Red Hat Linux 6.0.
In the /var/log/messages file, I get a number of apparently
successful messages referring to pcmcia, then a line with:
pcnet_cs: Request IO: No more items
When the system has booted, ifconfig eth0 n.n.n.n can't find any
such device, ping can't see any other systems in the building.
Meanwhile the ethernet adapter is blinking merrily away as
though there were no problem.
I've fiddled around with /etc/sysconfig/pcmcia, and
the line PCIC=i82365 is the only entry that gets me the
apparent activity.
Any suggestions more specific than the HOWTO's, etc? I'm
trying to avoid rebuilding kernel/messing with source, if
possible.
Judy Hawkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Richard Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba printing
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 12:21:22 +1000
I am trying to print from LInux to the NT-Server Hp LaserJet 6L.
I have Apsfilter output piped to the nt printer via samba.
Problem is, while translating the ps file using ghostscript, the system
constantly restarts gs and lpd each time the conversion is done.
How do I solve this?
Cheers
------------------------------
From: "Charles Ghent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Need some help networking with RH 6.0
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 09:01:52 -0400
I just set something like this up at home using RH6 and multiple Windoze
PCs. The main issue with the 2 ethernet cards is that you will probably
have to boot in DOS so that you can do the HW configuration before you try
and load them up. As far as RH goes, I know for roadrunner there are setup
scripts available online - I am not sure about MediaOne.
A 133 would work for this fine.... you could probably even get by with a
486. As far as backing up your laptop goes, you /could/ dual-boot your
linux box, but why not just buy a Jaz drive or something similar? You could
always use Samba or something also.....
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7o4ts4$509$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi I have a couple of questions. I'm looking to build a little home
> network between my laptop and my desktop. Both are in different rooms
> in the house. I had them both networked together with the Netgear
> starter kit, but disconnected it when I got Media One that I use on my
> laptop. I'm looking for a computer that is powerful enough to be a
> little server between my two computers. I want to set Linux up on it(
> and maybe Win98 so I can back up my laptop onto it) , have Media One
> come into one of the network cards, have the other network card go to
> the hub where the other two will be connected. How easy would this be
> to do? What kind of performance would i need in the server? I'm looking
> just to buy a 133 or 166 mhz for cheap money and wonder if it would
> work ok, I'm going to mainly use it for the internet connection and for
> a backup up system on the hard-drive for my laptop. I have a bit of
> experience in installing Linux and doing double OS setups on one
> computer. Thanks for any help! - Chris
>
>
>
> --
> Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Monte Phillips)
Subject: Re: Cannot ping - all the gory details on problem
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 12:21:52 GMT
"natarajs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Here are the details on the full output of ifconfig
>eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C0:00:2C:F0:05:A1
> inet addr:209.76.109.154 Bcast:209.76.109.255
>Mask:255.255.255.0
> BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> Base address:0x1400
This last line should have had the Interrupt listed as well I believe
i.e:
Interrupt:11 Base address:0x240
(the numbers for IRQ and address of course would differ from that
eaxample)
I would check that NIC's IRQ settings. Hey maybe wrong, but an idea!
:)
g'luk
>
>lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
> RX packets:556 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:556 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
------------------------------
From: Zoltan Nemeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: virtualhosts for ftpd?
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 13:30:38 GMT
Hello,
I have an average linux box used for a couple of server functions (mail,
DNS, ftp and http). With apache I could create the virtual hosts I needed,
but I'd like to have some virtual ftp servers also.
To be more exact :
The box has one nic, eth0, and one IP address, let's say 128.128.128.1
I have a domain name, e.g. mynet.com, and configured my box to be a DNS
server using named. It has one name and as many aliases as I like, let's
say mybox.mynet.com for the name and www.mynet.com, ftp.mynet.com and
otherwww.mynet.com as aliases.
I set up apache to have two virtual hosts, one for www.mynet.com and one
for otherwww.mynet.com, and it works fine.
Now I would like to create a new alias, otherftp.mynet.com, and have a
different virtual ftp server for that. I'd like otherftp.mynet.com requests
to send users into one root (/home/ftp/otherftp) and ftp.mynet.com to
another (/home/ftp/ftp) with no possibility to move between the two.
The main purpose for this is that anonymous users would be let into only
otherftp.mynet.com, but banned from ftp.mynet.com
I have heard about a couple of solutions, like IP aliasing and so on, but I
do not really know exact info about any of them.
I anybody has a solution for the above situation or knows where I can find
that please let me know.
Thanks
Zoltan Nemeth
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 18:31:37 -0700
From: "Santiago Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: uugetty - can't get RINGBACK to work
Hi,
Not sure whether this is the right group for this question... if not, just
tell me and I'll redirect it.
Introduction: running RH 5.2 (without any X software) on my home PC. I got
uugetty version 2.0.7j working with a 14.4k modem (Telebit QBlazer Plus)
connected to ttyS1, using the autoanswer configuration. That worked just
fine. Now I want to extend that to use the ringback feature, so as to be
able to leave the box available for dial-in throughout the day, while
allowing my wife to still receive phone calls... ;) And THAT is not
working: the modem answers my call at the second ring (or first, depending
on some settings in my /etc/default/uugetty.ttyS1 file).
Details:
I get uugetty up at boot time with the following line in inittab:
S1:345:respawn:/sbin/uugetty -d /etc/default/uugetty.ttyS1 ttyS1 F57600
vt100
/etc/gettydefs file is just the standard one that came with the
distribution.
Leaving out commented lines, my /etc/default/uugetty.ttyS1 file looks like
this:
=================================
DEBUG=777
RINGBACK=YES
MINRBTIME=10
MAXRBTIME=60
INTERRING=8
MINRINGS=1
MAXRINGS=3
INITLINE=cua1
TIMEOUT=60
INIT="" \d+++\dAT\r OK\r\n ATH0\r OK\r\n AT\sM1\sE1\sQ0\sV1\sX4\sS0=0\r
OK\r\n
WAITFOR=RING
CONNECT="" ATA\r CONNECT\s\A
DELAY=1
==================================
I've played around with the RINGBACK-associated parameters, and the only
difference in the outcome is whether modem answers after the first ring or
during/after the second. It _seems_ (don't take this too seriously) that
modem is answering 8 secs (or whatever the INTERRING value is) after the
first ring.
I turned on debugging (in growing levels of detail) to try to get a clue as
to what was happening, and here I found something that puzzled me. According
to info I happened to stumble upon, DEBUG=100 should log ringback debugging,
DEBUG=2 logs default file processing info, and so on; while DEBUG=777 logs
ALL categories. Although I turned on full debugging, I NEVER got a D_RB
message (i.e. ringback-related message) in my log file.
What's more, from the D_DEF messages of the default file processing, I never
get a "D_DEF: defvalue(RINGBACK) called", as I think I should get, since all
other parameters (SYSTEM, VERSION,...,TIMEOUT, CONNECT, WAITFOR, etc.) ARE
being called.
It's as if the RINGBACK=YES (plus associated parameters MINRBTIME,
MAXRBTIME, etc.) line did not exist !!! I confirmed that I'm making changes
to the _right_ file, since other changes are acknowledged (tried changing
the INIT and WAITFOR strings, just to see if changes were reflected in the
log file, and they certainly were).
If I were running an old version of uugetty I would be suspecting that it
had no RINGBACK support, but it IS listed in the documentation, and it comes
with an example ringback default file (which I started using, without any
luck).
Let me add that I have tried with different sets of MINRINGS, MAXRINGS,
INTERRING, MINRBTIME and MAXRBTIME values (since I saw that some people got
their problem solved doing just that), and the result is always the same
(except for _maybe_ a slight variation in the instant the modem answers).
BTW, I measured "interring time" in my area to be 5 secs (using 8 in file to
be in the safe side).
I'm sorry if this posting got too long. I just didn't want to leave out any
useful information. I have a full debugging trace of the dial-in call
process, and can provide all (or part of it) to anybody who might want to
look at it.
I hope somebody can shed some light on this. I will greatly appreciate any
help I can get.
Thanks,
Santiago Fisher
------------------------------
From: Joey Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Problems with Apache
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 11:52:21 -0400
> I run a Linux box running RedHat 6.0. i have Apache running and
> whenever i try to access any of the user's pages (/~whoever) it tells me
> that its Forbidden! ive had this working before... but i didnt do
> anyting to get it to work. it just did. i do have all html docs in
> /home/<username>/public_html any ideas?
What are the permissions on the public_html directories and on the files in
those directories?
------------------------------
From: "Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DFE-530TX D-Link NIC
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 19:43:53 -0700
Hey, anyone know how I can get this PCI card to work in RedHat Linux 6.0?
I've managed to gather that it needs a Rhine driver of some sort, and even
managed to download the source code for it, but I don't seem to have gcc
installed to compile the driver. Even then, I'm not sure what to do with it.
Thanks...
Just another Windows expert trying to learn a superior OS.....
------------------------------
From: Allen Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Firewall won't let me see ISP
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 18:54:35 -0700
Mike,
Your routing table looks okay, so that's not it. I think that you
may have a problem with your IP masquerading rules. Rereading your
original post, I noticed that your firewall is not forwarding packets
from your Win95 and Samba machines to your ISP. Nor is your Samba
server forwarding packets from your firewall to the Samba server's eth0
and your Win95 machine (forgive me if this is obvious). Is this what
you have on your Samba server?
/sbin/ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 0/0
And on your firewall, do you have something like
/sbin/ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -s 192.168.32.0/24 -d 0/0
If so, try
/sbin/ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -s 192.168.0.0/16 -d 0/0
on both your firewall and Samba server. Let me know if this works. If
it doesn't, please lie. ;o)
Allen
--
Linux: If you're not careful, you might actually learn something.
------------------------------
From: "TURBO1010" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Question about IPCHAINS HOWTO - IP Spoofing
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 19:35:27 -0700
In my caldera 2.2 I created the script in /etc/rc.d/init.d then I created
symbolic links, from /etc/rc.d/rc3.d, that way the script runs when I turn
on the machine.
Sean Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> I think I've almost got my system set up for ipchains, but I got one
> question. In section 5.7 of the ipchains howto it says:
>
> The best way to protect from IP spoofing is called Source Address
> verification, and it is done by the routing code, and not firewalling at
> all. Look for a file called /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/rp_filter. If
> this exists, then turning on Source Address Verification at every boot is
> the right solution for you. To do that, insert the following lines
> somewhere in your init scripts, before any network interfaces are .....
>
> Okay so I'm a bit of a newbie but are the init scripts that they are
> referring to in the /etc/init.d directory (using RH 6.0) or are there
> some other init scripts? I think then that all I have to do is make a
> script and make sure that it gets loaded before network and I'm money.
>
> Any feedback would be appreciated,
>
> sean
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
