Linux-Networking Digest #123, Volume #11 Wed, 12 May 99 03:13:48 EDT
Contents:
Re: Dem ol' SMC blues (Christopher Mahmood)
DHCP build concern (Azfar Kazmi)
Re: Alternative to SendMail? ("Curt")
Re: PPP and dial-up connections (RH 5.2) (Nick Ray)
minimal IP encapsulation (wenbo sheng)
Hook Up To FreeServe ("Maurice Bishop")
IP Masquerading doesn't work! (David Murray)
Re: @HOME Cable Service and Linux (Christopher Wiley)
Printing problem (Edouard Oyer)
Re: /var/log/messages is filling up when on the internet ! ? ? (Matteo Sartori)
Re: Linux und Windows-Dateinamen (Peter Suschlik)
weird conflict between pppd and named (Wiz)
Re: CablesCAT5 - confused... (Matt)
Re: LinuxPing -> NTping net problems DEC PCI (Matt)
Re: Two 3c509 Cards in one computer (Mark Crosland)
Re: Problems with pipes ("Mark K. Greene")
Re: LinuxPing -> NTping net problems DEC PCI (Matt)
Re: mounting NT filesystem (Alex Meisel)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Christopher Mahmood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Dem ol' SMC blues
Date: 11 May 1999 06:04:22 -0700
what distribution are you trying to download? most have an extra
floppy with other modules.
-ckm
------------------------------
From: Azfar Kazmi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DHCP build concern
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 05:17:20 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have obtained and uncompressed ISC's DHCP 1.0 Patch Level 2. Before
building it on my Redhat 5.2 [kernel 2.0.36] I have following concern:
I am inside an ethernet that has some 70 clients and three servers. All
have their static IPs and DNS entry already set.
My question is that when I build DHCPd, will it in any way affect
running clients? Running clients are Win 9x/NT/SCO/Linux/MacOS.
Thanks.
--
Azfar Kazmi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Alternative to SendMail?
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 17:28:59 -0500
Nope. I used an RPM someone put together. Re-configuration of MUA was part
of it.
See David Summers RPM link on main page.
Armand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7h9p46$pl3$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In article <JNMZ2.1101$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > www.qmail.org
> >
> > I found it much simpler to deal with than sendmail.
>
> AND the mail-HOWTO is mainly about qmail. How practical.
> It takes more time however, to configure your MUA for it.
>
> Armand
>
>
> --
> messages to a_r_man_dw at xs_4a_ll (dot) nl
> and remove the underscores
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------��������������������-------------------
> - Stop the execution of Mumia Abu-Jamal!! -
> - Copy these 3 sentences to your own sig. -
> - http://www.xs4all.nl/~tank/spg-l/sigaction.htm -
> -----------------��������������������-------------------
>
>
> http://mojo.calyx.net/~refuse/mumia/index.html
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nick Ray)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: PPP and dial-up connections (RH 5.2)
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 22:31:58 GMT
On 11 May 1999 04:28:59 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Sherlock) wrote:
>On Sun, 02 May 1999 19:14:13 +0200, RiverTonic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>:Try netcfg in X.
>:It comes with Redhat 5.2
>
>Well, here's a curly one then! I setuid'd pppd and tried running a script I made
>called start-ppp as someone other than root. Yet it says that it can't run pppd
>with the name option as anyone but root! can anyone help me out here?
>
I changed 'name' to 'user' and that fixed it for me.
>Oh, and btw, even using netcfg with the option of letting any user (de)activate
>the ppp interface doesn't help! What is going on here, somebody?
>
Nick
------------------------------
From: wenbo sheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: minimal IP encapsulation
Date: 11 May 1999 22:32:38 GMT
Do you know where is the software in Linux that supports RFC2004 (minimal
encapsulation within IP)?
Thanks in advance,
Wenbo.
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: "Maurice Bishop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Hook Up To FreeServe
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 23:30:48 +0100
Hi
I'm using RH5.2
Trying to find info which might help me hook up to Freeserve.
I am looking for good definitive instructions which will alow me to access
Freeserve from a client (Win 9x) attached to a RH5.2 host running proxy
software with ISDN access.
Big subject I know. Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Maurice Bishop
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: David Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP Masquerading doesn't work!
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 22:32:52 GMT
Okay, this is driving me crazy... All I did was reload my server with
RedHat 5.2 instead of Slackware 3.4... but I can't make IP Masq work!
Here is some info to start with:
Kernel Version 2.0.36 with all needed items compiled in.
Ifconfig looks like this:
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
RX packets:49 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:49 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:AA:00:A5:C4:AF
inet addr:192.168.0.10 Bcast:192.168.0.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:31970 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:29844 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:1
collisions:3
Interrupt:10 Base address:0x300
ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
inet addr:209.30.228.15 P-t-P:209.30.224.4
Mask:255.255.255.0
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:111 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:109 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
Memory:1139038-1139c04
And here is what my routing table looks like....
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
atnt5.dialup.ft * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
ppp0
192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 4
eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 2
lo
default atnt5.dialup.ft 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 4
ppp0
I have tried a variety of combinations of the ipfwadm command, but here
are a few combinations I have tried (not simultaneously) I have tried:
#ipfwadm -F -f
#ipfwadm -I -f
#ipfwadm -O -f
#ipfwadm -F -p deny
#ipfwadm -F -a masquerade -P tcp -S 192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0 -D 0.0.0.0/0
#ipfwadm -F -a masquerade -P udp -S 192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0 -D 0.0.0.0/0
ipfwadm -F -p deny
ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.0.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0
#ipfwadm -F -p deny
#ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.0.3/0 -D 0.0.0.0/0
#ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.0.7/0 -D 0.0.0.0/0
#ipfwadm -F -p deny
#ipfwadm -F -a m -S 0.0.0.0/0 -D 192.168.0.7/32
#ipfwadm -F -a m -S 0.0.0.0/0 -D 192.168.0.3/32
Now, the thing is.. the machines I want to be able to access the
internet have IP addresses of 192.168.0.xxx... The two I tried are
192.168.0.3 and 192.168.0.7. One is a Linux Box, the other Windows 95.
I also have a Mac on 192.168.0.11. Anyway, all of these were working
before with IP masq on the Slackware server.. so I haven't changed
anything on them and the IP address of the server is the same as it was
before (192.168.0.10) and yes, I know that was a poor choice for a
gateway IP address, but it has always worked for years...
I've been working on this for 24 hours and now I am going to give up and
let somebody smarter than me tell me what I am doing wrong!
--DavidM
------------------------------
From: Christopher Wiley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: @HOME Cable Service and Linux
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 15:00:34 -0700
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============37A59260DDF5804939068416
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Scott,
I've been running IP Masquerading on Slackware 3.6 at my house with the @Home
service since December with no problems. Either they're not concerned with my
personal Apache web server and FTP site and the LAN I've got behind the
firewall or they don't check such things. They use DHCP but I simply took the
IP settings from Winblows and entered them statically for Linux. I've had the
same IP ever since. The bandwidth is great and it works great!! Go for it!!
Laterz,
CW
"Joseph D. Carvalho" wrote:
> Hello Scott,
> I was a subscriber to the @HOME service for about a year. I was
> living in SanDiego at the time. I'd been given a 'leased' IP and was
> told that the lease was valid for approx 30 days. My system was
> never offline for any length of time, so I don't know if it would've
> expired.
>
> What I do know is they will shut you down if you attempt to run a server
> across their lan/wan. The teeny-tiny print in your contract with them says
> so.
> They never filtered any of my traffic, but when they found I was running a
> pseudo commercial server, BANG! Service suspended and subsequent
> nastygram to cease in the mail.
>
> Good luck, I miss having the bandwidth. Now I live in the mountains of
> Colorado
> and have to make due with a 24.4k dialup, but the quiet and scenery more
> than
> make up for it.
>
> --joe
> DE KR6NA
>
> Scott Robson wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >Hi
> >
> >Im curious if anyone has had any experience using linux with the @HOME
> >cable modem service (www.home.com).
> >
> >I know they do not support it, but is it possible to connect anyway and
> >do they fire wall? static or dynamic ip? Is the general performance of
> >the line good or bad?
> >
> >I'd plan to run a web server and maybe a mail server over it (for
> >completely personal use of course). Anyone have any experience with them?
> >
> >Thanx in Advance
> >
> >Scott
==============37A59260DDF5804939068416
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="wileycd.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for CW
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="wileycd.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Wiley;Christopher
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fn:Christopher Wiley
end:vcard
==============37A59260DDF5804939068416==
------------------------------
From: Edouard Oyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Printing problem
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 22:38:34 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Guys,
I really need your help on that one. I am in despair of doing anything.
I already went through the printing HOWTO and things are not the way
they should be.
I am able to print when I am logged as root. I can't otherwise. The
message I get is
"lpr: connect: permission denied.
Jobs queued, but cannot start daemon."
The printing HOWTO says it is generally due to a bad network
configuration. In that case how can I be able to print when being root?
I am loosing my last hair.
Thanks for your help,
Edouard
--
------------------------------
From: Matteo Sartori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: /var/log/messages is filling up when on the internet ! ? ?
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 00:15:18 +0000
> Sounds like the pppd option "kdebug 7" is present. Just remove it.
Yep, that was it. Thank you :)
------------------------------
From: Peter Suschlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc,fido.ger.linux
Subject: Re: Linux und Windows-Dateinamen
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 10:51:34 +0200
Michael Hoyer wrote:
>
> Ich habe unter Linux (Suse 6.1) eine Windows-Festplatte (W95) gemountet.
> Leider werden aber nicht alle Dateinamen so dargestellt, wie in Windows.
> Gibt es daf�r eine L�sung (insbes. Umlaute werden dann gro� geschrieben) ??
Mir faellt da nur vfat ein.
mount -t vfat [..] [..]
Gruss
--
Peter Suschlik
We don't fake - we just take it!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wiz)
Subject: weird conflict between pppd and named
Date: 11 May 1999 20:25:41 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I'm trying to set up a PPP server, but I encountered a quite strange problem,
and after two weeks of reading FAQs and manpages, I still haven't worked it
out yet.
When mgetty receives a phone call, it starts pppd with the following
parameters:
/usr/sbin/pppd debug kdebug 1 auth -chap +pap login -detach silent modem \
crtscts 192.168.0.1:192.168.0.99
Well, when the DNS is down everything works just fine and the client gets
connected to my server, but it is obviously unable to resolve any names since
there is no DNS. If I start the DNS server *after* the PPP link has come up,
everything works fine again, and the client even resolves names through my
DNS.
If, on the other hand, the DNS server is already up when mgetty starts pppd,
then my server authenticates the client correctly (I can see that in auth.log),
but it doesn't send out any aknowledgement, so the client sends authentications
which remain unanswered for 20 seconds or so, and then gives up and
disconnects.
Can anyone give me a clue about what is happening?
Thanks in advance.
--
_ ___ ____
| | /| / (_)_ / WARNING: anti-spam countermeasure
| |/ |/ / / / /_ to reply by mail, replace the domain "it"
|__/|__/_/ /___/ with "com" in the "reply-to" address.
Through Nature's inflexible grace, I'm learning to live. (Dream Theater)
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 07:15:01 +0100
From: Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: CablesCAT5 - confused...
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.networking.tcp-ip,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.windows,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.misc
Anton,
Many thanks for the info, I have now sucessfully made a patch cable
it works for Nt<->Nt and Win95->Nt (to check the network cards out
now all I need to do is test it on linux<->Nt. This is the hardest
part of all at the moment I think.
Oh yes so what you are saying is that one end is AT&T and the other
is IEE standards ?
Many thanks
Matt
Anton Jones wrote:
>
> Matt,
>
> if you noticed, T568A and B are
> similar, only the green pair and the
> orange pair are swapped.
>
> If you need to make a patch cable,
> you just need to match each end
> of the cable....same standard on each end.
> In order to create a crossover cable, you
> make one end T568A and the other T568B.
>
> T568A to T568A = Patch Cable (original)
> T568B to T568B = Patch Cable (new/alternate)
> T568A to T568B = Crossover Cable
> ____________________________________
> Anton Jones
> A+ & +I
> MCSomething or other
> CNA (Certified Nut Admittedly)
>
> "All certifications are printed using
> only premium quality inkjet paper"
> ____________________________________
> Remove -ALL- underscores for e-mail.
>
> Matt wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >Ok now I am confused..
> >
> >There are so many cabeling standards.
> >I know of 2 IEE and the AT&T standard, also something on the crossover
> >side, but is there another standard for this too ie a IEE crossover and
> >a AT&T crossover ?
> >
> >I need I think a crossover for a IEE cable network, which one should I
> >chose ?
> >
> >What do the standards stand for regarding AT&T and IEE ?
> >
> >Standard EIA/TIA 568
> >Standard EIA/TIA T568B
> >USOC (Universal Service Order Code)
> >
> >I can now count to 6 standards.
> >
> >A few nice sites are these...
> >
> >http://www.digitalmx.com
> >
> >http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/hypertext/faq/usenet/LANs/cabling-faq/faq-doc
> -9.html
> >
> >Many thanks
> >
> >Matt
> >
> >9.0 Standard EIA/TIA 568
> >
> > The ANSI/EIA/TIA-568-1991 Standard _Commercial Building
> > Telecommunications Wiring Standard_ defines pinouts;
> >
> > 9.1 Standard EIA/TIA T568A
> > (also called ISDN, previously called EIA)
> >
> > Pin Wire Color
> > === ==========
> > /--T3 1 White/Green
> > Pair3 \--R3 2 Green
> > /----------T2 3 White/Orange
> > / /-R1 4 Blue
> > pair2 \ pair1 \-T1 5 White/Blue
> > \----------R2 6 Orange
> > /--T4 7 White/Brown
> > pair4 \--R4 8 Brown
> >
> >
> > 9.2 Standard EIA/TIA T568B
> > (also called AT&T specification, previously called 258A)
> >
> > /--T2 1 White/Orange
> > pair2 \--R2 2 Orange
> > /----------T3 3 White/Green
> > / /-R1 4 Blue
> > pair3 \ pair1 \-T1 5 White/Blue
> > \----------R3 6 Green
> > /--T4 7 White/Brown
> > pair4 \--R4 8 Brown
> >
> >
> > 9.3 USOC (Universal Service Order Code)
> >
> > 8-pins 6-pins
> > | |
> > /-------------T4 1 White/Brown
> > / /---------T3 2 1 White/Green
> > / / /-----T2 3 2 White/Orange
> > / / / /-R1 4 3 Blue
> > pr4\ pr3\ pr2\ pr1\-T1 5 4 White/Blue
> > \ \ \-----R2 6 5 Orange
> > \ \---------R3 7 6 Green
> > \-------------R4 8 Brown
> >
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 07:22:09 +0100
From: Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: LinuxPing -> NTping net problems DEC PCI
Well, I managed to get Nt<->Nt working and Win95->Nt working, to
test out the cables and the network cards so I feel as though I am
halfway there. Now I have to check Linux<->Nt, I will try the routing
you sugested and get backto you with the results. But I can see (I hope)
the light near the end of the tunnel.
How to I set the timing (MTU), as one mentions 56 and the other 128.
Many thanks
Matt
mist wrote:
>
> Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that -
> >
> >Changed the dummy route to..
> >
> >route del 192.168.10.2 dev dummy0
> >
>
> Good.
>
> >and
> >
> >route del 192.168.10.0 dev eth0
> >
>
> Nope, you still need that route.
>
> >changed to
> >
> >route add 192.168.10.2 dev eth0
> >
>
> That's nonsensical, as the linux box itself is 192.168.10.2
>
> >Now I get the comments of..
> >
> >ping sendto: network is unreachable
> >
>
> Yup, because the -net route no longer exists. You will always need at
> least one route saying which network flows across eth0, like
>
> route add -net 192.168.10.0
>
> along with the other stuff.
>
> <snip older stuff>
>
> So to recap, on the linux box you basically need.
>
> ifconfig dummy0 down
> ifconfig eth0 down
>
> [just to remove everything]
>
> ifconfig eth0 192.168.10.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast
> 192.168.10.255 up
>
> ^^^^^ That statement needs to be just one line, in case your newsreader
> wraps it to two.
>
> route add -net 192.168.10.0
>
> Then that should be set up.
> --
> Mist.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Crosland)
Subject: Re: Two 3c509 Cards in one computer
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 06:25:53 GMT
Actually, you can set the io/irq's on linux with a utility on
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/setup
In article <ST5_2.1158$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Curt wrote:
>I assume you don't want eth1 at irq 3, since that is reserved for 2nd serial
>port (COM2).
>You probably want to use IRQ 10 or 11 for eth1. IRQ 5 is fine for eth0.
>
>Try this in your /etc/conf.modules
>
>options eth0 io=0x210 irq=5
>options eth1 io=0x300 irq=10
>options eth1 io=
>alias eth0 3c509
>alias eth1 3c509
>
>You'll need to use your DOS based NIC config software to set the io and irqs
>as you expect them to be in
>your /etc/conf.modules.
>
>Don't use lilo append unless you've compiled the drivers into your kernel.
>Base on your post, it doesn't look like they are in your kernel.
>
>Jonathon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:7hao1l$rjc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>>
>>
>> I'm trying to configure a PC with 2 3c509b network
>> cards in it, to now avail.
>>
>> I did read Mini-HowTo on using multiple
>> Ethernet Adapters with Linux V 2.00
>> ( http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/misc/multicard.html
>> is where I found the copy I read. )
>>
>> Operating System: Linux
>> Distribution: RedHat 5.2
>> CPU Intel Pentium II
>> RAM 64 MB
>> Network Protocol TCP/IP
>> Network Cards 3Com 3c509B ISA
>> { 3c509B, not 3c905B }
>>
>> PnP for the network cards has been disabled.
>> Testing them using the DOS Utilities on the disk
>> we recieved with the card shows that each
>> card does work
>>
>>
>>
>> writing /etc/conf/modules as
>>
>> alias eth0 3c509
>> alias eth1 3c509
>> options 3c509 0x210,0x300
>>
>> resulted in the system not recognising _either_ card.
>>
>> writing /etc/lilo.conf
>>
>> append = "ether=5,0x210,eth1"
>> rest of the lilo.conf
>>
>> resulted in that card being recognised, but
>> not both. Changing it
>>
>> append = "ether=5,0x210,eth1 ether=3,0x300,eth0"
>>
>> resulted in neither card being recognised.
>>
>> What other alternatives are there --- or what have
>> I missed, to get both cards to work.
>>
>> Or do I just have to learn how to compile the
>> kernel? And pray that I correctly include
>> everything I should?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The current system configuration and results
>> are as follows
>>
>>
>> /etc/conf/modules is as follows
>>
>> alias eth0 3c509
>> alias eth1 3c509
>>
>> /etc/lilo.conf is as follows
>>
>> boot=/dev/hda map=/boot/map install=/boot/boot.b prompt timeout=50
>> image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.0.36-0.7
>> label=linux
>> root=/dev/hda1
>> read-only
>>
>>
>> /etc/hosts is as follows
>>
>> 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
>> 209.102.31.165 vrystaat.stamp-coin.com
>> 209.102.31.166 firewall.stamp-coin.com
>> 209.102.31.164 natal.stamp-coin.com
>> 209.102.31.163 capeofstorms.stamp-coin.com
>>
>> ifconfig gives the following output
>> ( Which is _not_ adjusted for LF/CR )
>>
>> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
>> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
>> UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
>> RX packets:2483 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:2483 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0
>>
>> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:04:22:09:BE
>> inet addr:209.102.31.165 Bcast:209.102.31.191
>> Mask:255.255.255.192
>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:11219 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:17744 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:1042
>> Interrupt:5 Base address:0x210
>>
>> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:04:22:25:CD
>> inet addr:209.102.31.166 Bcast:209.102.31.191
>> Mask:255.255.255.192
>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:2840 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:46 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0
>> Interrupt:3 Base address:0x300
>>
>>
>> Ping gives the following results
>>
>> PING 209.102.31.165 (209.102.31.165): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from
>> 209.102.31.165: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.1 ms 64 bytes from
>> 209.102.31.165: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.1 ms 64 bytes from
>> 209.102.31.165: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.1 ms 64 bytes from
>> 209.102.31.165: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.1 ms 64 bytes from
>> 209.102.31.165: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.1 ms
>>
>> --- 209.102.31.165 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets
>> received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 0.1/0.1/0.1 ms
>>
>>
>> PING 209.102.31.166 (209.102.31.166): 56 data bytes
>>
>> --- 209.102.31.166 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 0 packets
>> received, 100% packet loss
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>> Jonathon
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> ( and when I get this network configured
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
>>
>>
>> --
>> I'm still looking for a good book on
>> 3: The Recent Unpleasantness
>> 1: The War Of Northern Aggression.
>> 2: The War of Southern Rebellion.
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Mark K. Greene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Problems with pipes
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 23:41:01 -0500
use the select(2) system call
Christopher Swanson wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hello Everyone,
>
>I am having a problem with what I think is blocking I/O. I have two
>processes executing, let's call them server and console. The server
>process has two pipes to read from. The problem I am having is: if I try
>to read from a pipe that has had nothing written to it, then the process
>will wait until the pipe is written to.
>
>Is there a way to check a pipe to see if there is data ready to be read?
>
>Chris
>
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 07:30:29 +0100
From: Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: LinuxPing -> NTping net problems DEC PCI
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.networking.tcp-ip,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc
Well my Nt<->Nt config works fine, I needed to test the cards,
and the cable.
Next its the Linux<->Nt still no luck there. I think its the config on
Linux.
How can I test to see if I am only using TCP/IP and not NetBxxx ?
Is there an easy option, I can imagine I can remove the NetBxxx
on the routing of My Computer/Networking but I'd hate to messup
the config again.
Many thanks
Matt
Sylvan Butler wrote:
>
> On Sun, 09 May 1999 09:47:34 +0100, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Pinging to Linux Box from NT ?
> >
> >Pinging 192.168.10.0 with 32 bytes of data:
>
> 192.168.10.0 would be an illegal IP address.
>
> >Pinging NT itsself (same IP addess)
> >Pinging 192.168.10.1 with 32 bytes of data:
>
> 192.168.10.1 is legal.
>
> >Pinging Linux Box ?
>
> Where from?
>
> >Pinging on Linux..
> >
> >% ping 192.168.10.0
> >
> >PING 192.168.10.0 (192.168.10.0): 56 data bytes
> >
> >
> >--- 192.168.10.0 ping statistics ---
> >7 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
>
> Yup. That illegal IP again.
>
> >% ping 192.168.10.1
> >
> >PING 192.168.10.1 (192.168.10.1): 56 data bytes
> >
> >--- 192.168.10.1 ping statistics ---
> >6 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
>
> OK, a route must be bad.
>
> >% ping 192.168.10.2 (itself)
> >
> >PING 192.168.10.2 (192.168.10.2): 56 data bytes
> >64 bytes from 192.168.10.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.1 ms
>
> Looks good.
>
> >% netstat -rn
> >
> >Kernel IP routing table
> >Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
> >192.168.10.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 1500 0 0 dummy0
> >192.168.10.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0 eth0
> >127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0 lo
> >
> >% route
> >
> >Kernel IP routing table
> >Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> >192.168.10.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 dummy0
> >192.168.10.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 2 eth0
> >127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 2 lo
>
> Do you notice that those are both the same?
>
> That route to 192.168.10.2 seems bogus...
>
> What is the 'dummy0' device? Are you perhaps running IPAlias? If so, Why?
>
> I'd probably delete that route to dummy...
> "route del 192.168.10.2"
> But it doesn't appear to be used, so it probably won't matter.
>
> >% ifconfig
> >dummy0 Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00
> > inet addr:192.168.10.2 Bcast:192.168.10.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> > TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> >
> >eth0 Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:C7:99:0D:F4
> > inet addr:192.168.10.2 Bcast:192.168.10.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > RX packets:0 errors:477 dropped:0 overruns:0
> > TX packets:0 errors:20 dropped:0 overruns:0
> > Interrupt:11 Base address:0xe800
>
> Other than the questionable dummy, that info looks good.
>
> What is the NT netmast, default gw, etc.?
>
> sdb
> --
> | Sylvan Butler | Not speaking for Hewlett-Packard | sbutler-boi.hp.com |
> | Watch out for my e-mail address. Thank UCE. #### change ^ to @ #### |
> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. --Benjamin Franklin, 1759
> "Don't Tread On Me!"
------------------------------
From: Alex Meisel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: mounting NT filesystem
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 08:40:36 +0200
Kostis Mentzelos wrote:
>
> Hi, how can I mount a NT filesystem without using samba?
>
> Kostis Mentzelos.
Hi!
What you need is Sharity (http://www.obdev.at/). It works
on most unix-systems (including linux), but is not GNU!
Sooo long!
AleX
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
