Linux-Networking Digest #127, Volume #11 Wed, 12 May 99 10:14:31 EDT
Contents:
Re: How to configure Linux as a Proxy server ("John Smith")
Re: Usernet 'configuration' (Geoff Allsup)
Re: WinNT cannot resolve Samba server name ("Ron van Middendorp")
Re: network issues (Frank Waarsenburg)
Re: Printing problem (Andrew)
Re: ipfwadm rules, help please! (Aaron Baugher)
Re: Problems with looking up hostnames after upgrade (Greg White)
Re: Translate (i)pppd hex output to ascii ("Kjoe")
Re: dhcpcd with 2.0.35 (Matt Bradley)
Re: DHCP build concern (Frank Waarsenburg)
Re: IP Masquerading doesn't work! (Mircea)
Re: I have a PCI NE200 card but...... ("David Murray")
Re: How to Dialup to Linux Server !? (Hartmann Schaffer)
'lo' & 'eth0' devices inactive: how come ? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: 'lo' & 'eth0' devices inactive: how come ? ("David Murray")
Re: Serial Monitor ("David Murray")
Re: LinuxPing -> NTping net problems DEC PCI (Matt)
Re: valid host names in dns tables (Aaron Baugher)
Re: Help me with masquerading, please (Aaron Baugher)
Re: How to Dialup to Linux Server !? (Bill Unruh)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "John Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to configure Linux as a Proxy server
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 06:04:52 -0700
You could consider recompiling your kernel to allow IP masqurrrading, this
is very well explained in an howto called
IP-Masquerading.
Masquerading allow your computers on the network to access more server like
irc servers or realaudio sites.
Squid does only allow FTP and HHTP.
Well. For more information consult the IP Masquerading document, if you cant
find it, please, mail me, and I'll send it!
Hope this can help
John Smith
Witman Peng a �crit dans le message <7hbc9g$3b5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi, All
>
>I have a Linux box and several Windows machine. I want to all PC can access
>Internet via the Linux box. The Linux box connect to the IPS via a POTS
>modem. Which software should I use? Thanks in advance.
>
>BR,
>Witman Peng
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geoff Allsup)
Subject: Re: Usernet 'configuration'
Date: 12 May 1999 12:14:24 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 11 May 1999 23:49:43 -0400, Steve Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi there,
>
>I've (finally) got my PPP connection to my ISP working (RH5.2) -
>hurrah! Unfortunately i have to type this huge command in to start the
>connection every time :
>
>/usr/sbin/pppd /dev/modem 115200 debug user bk875 connect
>"/usr/sbin/chat -v '' AT OK ATD5551234 CONNECT '\d\c'"
>
>I'd like to use the 'quick-n-easy' Usernet app to turn ppp on/off but
have you tried /usr/sbin/usernetctl ppp0 up (or down) ?? Works for me.
geoff
--
******************************************************************
Geoff Allsup Upper Ocean Processes Group
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, MA, USA
******************************************************************
------------------------------
From: "Ron van Middendorp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: WinNT cannot resolve Samba server name
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 13:33:35 +0200
Reply-To: "Ron van Middendorp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
As far as I can see, you haven't got any shares defined.
Start with "smb.conf"
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Ron van Middendorp
Centennium Detachering iov debis IT Services
Horst Haug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi there,
>
> I'm a newbie with both Linux and Samba. I try to setup a connection
> between
> my Windows NT host named Liebling and my linux server named Interlux.
>
> Following problem:
> When I try to see directories on Interlux with the 'net view \\Interlux'
> command
> I get these error messages:
> System error 53 has occurred.
> The network path was not found.
>
> Same command with the IP adress instead of the name works. Similar
> things happen
> from NT explorer. Mapping a Interlux share on a network drive with the
> IP address
> works but not with the name Interlux.
> Surprisingly I can connect to Interlux (name!, not IP address) with
> telnet or ping.
>
> Settings I have already are:
> - entries on NT in
> Winnt\sytem32\drivers\etc\hosts, networks and lmhosts
> TCP/IP protocol has Interlux as DNS server and WINS server
> - configuration in smb.conf is:
> [global]
> workgroup = WORKGROUP
> netbios name = INTERLUX
> keepalive = 30
> hosts allow = localhost, 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0
> browseable = yes
> - Samba version is 2.0.3
>
> I'm lost. Any help is highly appreciated.
>
> Horst
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
------------------------------
From: Frank Waarsenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: network issues
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 14:27:24 +0200
Dit you put the machine's names in the /etc/hosts file on every machine?
Worked for me...
Frank
Chris Lumens wrote:
> Hi everyone. I've got some serious networking issues. I have a server called
> ziggurat which is running kernel version 2.2.6 and has two Linksys EtherFast
> cards in it. It's also got the masq action going, via use of the ipfwadm
> wrappers. I have a workstation called monolith that is masked behind it and
> runs kernel version 2.2.0. It has a 3Com Vortex/Boomerang card.
>
> So the issue is that I am getting 3 second ping times between the two computers.
> I'm not doing anything to the outside world...just pinging between my two
> computers. I've ruled out just about all the hardware possibilities by testing
> all sorts of things - cards, cables, hub, etc. However, I could be wrong...
>
> Earlier today, it was working just fine for a few hours, but has since gone
> back to being very slow. The strangest thing is if I try to telnet from one
> to the other. Initially, it takes a very long time to establish the
> connection. But once it is set up, I can do stuff at a pretty good speed.
> However, doing things like ftp or web stuff is just about impossible.
>
> Please help...I feel like I'm on a 14.4 modem!
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------
> Chris Lumens
> http://octagon.resnet.gatech.edu
> founder of The Octagon * Creator of Spasm
> -------------------------------------------------
> "If it wasn't for disappointment, I wouldn't have
> any appointments."
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 11:41:19 +0000
From: Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Printing problem
Hey,
Are you trying to print over a network? Is that why you are saying
"due to a bad network configuration"? If that's the case, you need a
file on the computer with the printer called hosts.lpd in the /etc
directory. It should list host names of the computer you want access
to the printer. Also the host should exist in /etc/hosts
ex. /etc/hosts
192.1681.1 foo.who.org foo
ex. /etc/hosts.lpd
foo
Andrew....
Edouard Oyer wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I really need your help on that one. I am in despair of doing anything.
> I already went through the printing HOWTO and things are not the way
> they should be.
> I am able to print when I am logged as root. I can't otherwise. The
> message I get is
> "lpr: connect: permission denied.
> Jobs queued, but cannot start daemon."
> The printing HOWTO says it is generally due to a bad network
> configuration. In that case how can I be able to print when being root?
> I am loosing my last hair.
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Edouard
> --
------------------------------
Subject: Re: ipfwadm rules, help please!
From: Aaron Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 12 May 1999 07:32:29 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (urgrue) writes:
> i have a two linux machines, set up like this:
>
> linux linux
> box #1 box #2
> eth0<-------->eth0 / eth1<-------internet
> (1.0.0.2) (1.0.0.1) (real IP#)
First of all, there are IP ranges that are set aside for networks
which will not be routed to the Internet, like Masq'd networks. They
are 10.x.x.x, 192.168.x.x, and I forget the other one. If you use
something else, you risk being unable to contact machines on the net
that actually have the same address.
Most examples of IP Masq seem to use 192.168.x.x, so I would recommend
using that.
> i'm trying to make box #2 into a firewall with masquerading.
> box 2's connections to both box 1 and the internet work fine.
>
> #denying everything by default
> ipfwadm -F -p deny
> #allowing www to anywhere
> ipfwadm -F -a accept -m -P tcp -S 1.0.0.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0 80
This should work, but
> #allowing dns to anywhere
> ipfwadm -F -a accept -m -P udp -S 1.0.0.0/24 53 -D 0.0.0.0/0
why'd you put the DNS port on the source here? This is allowing
outgoing connections *from* port 53 only, not *to* port 53, which is
what you want.
> anyway now what two things happen: first, upon trying to telnet to
> 1.0.0.2 (box 1) it takes about 1-2 minutes to connect.
This is because you don't have a rule allowing 1.0.0.2 to reach the
external DNS. (I'm assuming you aren't running your own DNS, or you
wouldn't be adding a masq rule for it.) When you telnet to that box,
it tries to reverse lookup 1.0.0.1 (the interface you're coming from)
and telnetd waits until that fails. You'll probably want to put your
two machines' local addresses in /etc/hosts, since even when you get
masq working, you won't be giving your machines IP addresses that
lookup to anything meaningful on your ISP's DNS.
> second, nothing works outwards (www, in this case, and dns). they
> merely 'hang', without any rejection error or anything.
Your port 80 rule above looks fine, so I'm wondering if www is hanging
because DNS is hanging first. Have you tried http to an IP address?
You might want to post the rest of your rules, too, in case one of the
later ones is conflicting with the first three.
Aaron
--
Aaron Baugher - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Quincy, IL, USA
Extreme Systems Consulting - http://haruchai.rnet.com/esc/
CGI, Perl, Java, and Linux/Unix Administration
------------------------------
From: Greg White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux.slackware,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Problems with looking up hostnames after upgrade
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 01:50:47 GMT
Gambit32 wrote:
>
> Also:
>
> May 10 12:19:44 www named[6317]: Ready to answer queries.
> May 10 12:19:54 www named[6317]: No root nameservers for class IN
>
> Dammit. Im so lost for ideas
>
> On Sun, 09 May 1999 16:27:24 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Gambit32) wrote:
>
> >we recently upgraded from slackware 3.1 to 3.6, and now our machine is
> >having severe problems getting hosts from ips.
> >
> >TCP wrappers should give out the username@host when we connect to our
> >server, but that doesnt work. it gives usernam@ip.
> >
> >In my perl scripts and includes on my web page
> >(http://www.academic.marist.edu/carob/) it should be saying came from
> >host / ip but that doesnt work either.
> >
> >Even more peculiar, we have listings in /etc/hosts like
> >148.100.215.108 area51.groom-lake.nv.us area51
> >When i connect to the machine, it used to say
> >"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" but it wont even do THAT anymore.
> >
> >I have no idea exactly where the problem is. Ive checked the kernel,
> >my perl scripts, ive recompiled my wrapper program. im just lost!
> >
> >PLEASE anyone who can help. PLEASE.
> >
I'm by no means a DNS expert, but here's a couple of thoughts:
1. Are you doing your own DNS, or is someone doing it for you, i.e. a
service provider? If the former, I highly recommend that you have a look
at the DNS-HOWTO. It's not a long document (about 10-20 pages), and it
has all the info necessary to get a basic DNS going for your site,
including automatic scheduled update of 'root.cache'. If not, try
killing named, and verify that /etc/resolv.conf contains only your ISPs
DNS address.
http://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/DNS-HOWTO
for the HOWTO.
If the DNS-HOWTO sounds confusing, feel free to email me. I have a
mostly working server at work (failing hard disk, but holding up,
hopefully, until the new one gets here), that I can cadge answers from..
GW
P.S. Follow-ups set to alt.os.linux.slackware, as that's where I've been
following this thread.
------------------------------
From: "Kjoe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp,xs4all.isdn,nl.comp.isdn,de.alt.comm.isdn4linux
Subject: Re: Translate (i)pppd hex output to ascii
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 14:04:45 +0200
>
> >>>>>My program is written as a filter, i.e. it accepts characters from
stdin and
> >>>>>writes them to stdout. You can start it with: "cat | hex", and then
copy
> >>>>>and paste the hexadecimal numbers into standard in.
>
> >>>> Why the cat?
>
> >>>for sending keyboard input to stdin; you could also use "echo
<whatever> |
> >>>hex" to start it. It is not designed to pipe the entire debug file
through
> >>>it; if you do then normal text will become unreadable... it's not
highly
> >>>sophisticated.
>
> >> "cat |" is nearly a no-op.
>
> >er
>
> >you could also write just "./hex", can't you ;)
>
> >I hadn't thought of that before. I know, I must be very ashamed.
> >Sometimes things are even more simple than they seem.
>
> >I'll go read the Beginners' Guide into Linux now.
>
> Years ago there used to be a "Useless use of cat"-of-the-week award
> in the comp.os.unix group. I don't know if it still exists.
>
> It was awarded to that week's person who posted some shell script (usually
> to have it debugged by newsgroup readers) that contained things
> like:
>
> cat filename | sed -e "s/x/y"
>
> But also "cat |", of course.
>
> Rob
> --
i'm sure somebody finds cat useful for something
------------------------------
From: Matt Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: dhcpcd with 2.0.35
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 04:59:05 -0700
Never mind, I got the isc client working instead.
Matt Bradley wrote:
> I can not for the life of me get dhcpcd working. I'm running Slackware
> 3.6 with a 2.0.35 kernel. I get the error message "dhcpStart: socket:
> Invalid argument" in the dhcpcd log file. I'm using dhcpcd 1.3.17-pl6.
> I can't seem to find the older .7 version anywhere. Thanks for any
> help.
------------------------------
From: Frank Waarsenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DHCP build concern
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 14:42:50 +0200
Just make sure that the IP addresses dispatched by the DHCP server do not
conflict with the existing static addresses. If you take care of that, no
conflicts will arise.
Frank
Azfar Kazmi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have obtained and uncompressed ISC's DHCP 1.0 Patch Level 2. Before
> building it on my Redhat 5.2 [kernel 2.0.36] I have following concern:
>
> I am inside an ethernet that has some 70 clients and three servers. All
> have their static IPs and DNS entry already set.
>
> My question is that when I build DHCPd, will it in any way affect
> running clients? Running clients are Win 9x/NT/SCO/Linux/MacOS.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Azfar Kazmi
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
> ---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: Mircea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP Masquerading doesn't work!
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 21:59:08 -0400
I was just about to suggest the same thing...I had to deal with the same
problem in Slackware 3.6 last week. Glad you made it.
MST
David Murray wrote:
> You are a lifesaver! That is what the problem was! I never knew about this
> setting and never needed to change it under Slackware. I also noticed when
> it was booting up that I would see a message saying it was disabled.
> I figured it was turned on later when I used the commands..
> --DavidM
------------------------------
From: "David Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: I have a PCI NE200 card but......
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 12:46:44 GMT
> The only little problem that I'm facing is that I'm using an UMSDOS
system
> (Linux is on a W95 partition) and I use Loadlin to boot the kernel. Is
there
> a way to add extra parameters to the loadlin command line so that my PCI
and
> ISA cards work fine?
Well, here is my $0.02... Are you using modules for the network drivers or
compiling the ne2000 driver right into the kernel? Also, did you know that
the newer kernels have a different driver for PCI Ne2000 cards and ISA
NE2000 cards? You might want to try both? Yes, it is possible to pass
commands to the kernel through loadlin, but if you are using modules, then
you can pass commands to the modules with insmod or if you have an
/etc/conf.modules (or is it modules.conf?) anyway..
--DavidM
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hartmann Schaffer)
Subject: Re: How to Dialup to Linux Server !?
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 03:26:29 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Chow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to dialup to Linux Server from Linux workstation or
> other platform ?
> If it can, would you please to teach me how to setup it ??
>
> Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Best regards,
> Eric
Me too please. I have been particular unsuccessful setting up, and I
haveen;t gotten any response to my inquiries.
Hartmann schaffer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 'lo' & 'eth0' devices inactive: how come ?
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 12:13:32 GMT
Hi here,
Could someone PLEASE tell me why my 2 devices lo & eth0 are inactive
in the Network Manager ?? I'd just like to know where I can find
the line that should bring them up when Linux boots on my PC (I have
Red Hat 5.2 distrib.). In which file should I find this line in
Red Hat ??
If I do 'ifconfig' I get no output, if I try 'ftp 0' or 'ping
myMachine' it fails as well. What amazes me is that I have 2 PC's,
and one works fine: and I can't seem to be able to find out what is
wrong on the PC that fails (from the configuration point of view).
Thanks a lot for any help !!
Regards,
Seb
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: "David Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 'lo' & 'eth0' devices inactive: how come ?
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 12:50:57 GMT
Okay.. I'll try to help, but somebody else may need to fill in the gaps I
leave.. First, try this:
ifconfig eth0 up
or
ifconfig lo up
Then, run ifconfig again and see if it shows your ethernet card, or does it
give you an error message? if it says something about eth0 doesn't exist
or something, then the module wasn't installed.. One common problem is if
you recompiled your kernel but forgot to use this command afterwords..
make modules_install
None of your modules will load and this is the result... Now, if you do
manage to get eth0 up by doing the command above, try doing this:
ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 (or whatever it's IP address should be)
route add default gw 192.168.0.1
Then try to ping something on your network and see if it doesn't work!
--DavidM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in article <7hbr9c$tq6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Hi here,
> Could someone PLEASE tell me why my 2 devices lo & eth0 are inactive
> in the Network Manager ?? I'd just like to know where I can find
> the line that should bring them up when Linux boots on my PC (I have
> Red Hat 5.2 distrib.). In which file should I find this line in
> Red Hat ??
------------------------------
From: "David Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Serial Monitor
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 12:55:15 GMT
Ohhhh. this hits home very well.. I have had this same problem myself for
quite a while until I finally decided to buy a monitor, keyboard, mouse,
and desk.. Fortunatly I found a very small black&white VGA monitor and
bought one of those compact keybaords and so it doesn't take up too much
space..
Anyway, yes you are on the right track.. Before getting the solution I
have now, I had created a long serial cable (about 50 ft) and had console
routed to the serial port. This does indeed work, and should help you..
but again, it isn't all that much more helpfull than telnet if your machine
doesn't boot! After all, you can't get into the BIOS and change settings
or anything like that..
> graphics/network cards etc, just no monitor attached. The problem is
> that whenever I upgrade or have problems booting etc, I end up having to
> turn the living room upside down to get the machines to a monitor or
> vice-versa. What I'm really looking for is some means of remotely
> administering them without all that hassle (At present I use telnet,
> whcih is fine as long as they've booted correctly).
------------------------------
From: Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.networking.tcp-ip,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc
Subject: Re: LinuxPing -> NTping net problems DEC PCI
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 14:31:39 +0100
Andrew,
Yep I attempted that, but for some reason the Linux box fails to see the NT box
and visa versa. After looking at the results from the Nt->Nt config and the
ifconfig/netstat/route commands I can see the box has the 192.168.10.0
network address on Linux and NT.
I have also attempted to ping the boxes from both ends but with no luck,
yet I will try again, I am also begining to think that it maybe the network card
but as the card was picked up in the logon etc. This may not be the case ?
Could it be the MTU's or some other setting I will also try to disable the
password encryption on NT too. Or is there a better option ?
Many thanks
Matt
------------------------------
Subject: Re: valid host names in dns tables
From: Aaron Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 12 May 1999 07:38:40 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I have a DNS server running Red Hat v5.2 with Bind v8. Are
> underscores valid in hostnames? When I do an nslookup on a hostname
> with an underscore in it I get an error.
AFAIK, underscores are not valid. I unknowingly tried to register a
domain with an underscore with Internic a few years ago, and it came
back with a hyphen instead.
Aaron
--
Aaron Baugher - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Quincy, IL, USA
Extreme Systems Consulting - http://haruchai.rnet.com/esc/
CGI, Perl, Java, and Linux/Unix Administration
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: Help me with masquerading, please
From: Aaron Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 12 May 1999 07:36:45 -0500
Tero Niemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yeap, it really is. Now I can ping from the ethernet to the
> outside world but not vice versa. I have a little nameserver
> which states our machines as for example mach1.alias.fi,
> mach2.alias.fi and so on... You cannot ping from outside.
Of course not. The outside world doesn't see those machines at all.
IP Masq makes connections from them all look like they come from the
Masq server. You can't initiate a connection from the outside to one
of your internal machines. The connection has to be started by the
internal machine, so the Masq server knows to which machine to send
the packets that come back.
Aaron
--
Aaron Baugher - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Quincy, IL, USA
Extreme Systems Consulting - http://haruchai.rnet.com/esc/
CGI, Perl, Java, and Linux/Unix Administration
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Unruh)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: How to Dialup to Linux Server !?
Date: 12 May 1999 04:12:37 GMT
In <Fx6_2.30759$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hartmann
Schaffer) writes:
]In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
] Chow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
]> Is it possible to dialup to Linux Server from Linux workstation or
]> other platform ?
]> If it can, would you please to teach me how to setup it ??
]Me too please. I have been particular unsuccessful setting up, and I
]haveen;t gotten any response to my inquiries.
Step 1
Get and install mgetty.
Step 2
Configure mgetty
Decide if you want login authentication (user logs on and runs pppd after he has
logged
on) or pap/chap (set up the AutoPPP in /etc/mgetty*/login.config)
Step 3
put the line
S0:2345:respawn:/usr/local/sbin/mgetty ttyS0
into /etc/inittab
(changing S0 and ttyS0 to whatever the port is that your modem is on)
To get voluminous debugging, put -x 8 after mgetty, and change the lines debug 4 (or
debug 3) in /etc/
/etc/mgett*/mgetty.conf to debug 8. Then look in /var/log/mgetty.ttyS?
Step 3
Dial in and enjoy
(Of course step 2 can take a bit longer, but here is not the place to write a 10 page
essay on how to set
up mgetty.)
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
