Linux-Networking Digest #130, Volume #11 Wed, 12 May 99 15:13:39 EDT
Contents:
Re: MediaOne Cable Modem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: printing to a apple laserwriter from my linux-box (Jan CSERNOCH)
Re: ipfwadm masq ("David Murray")
Re: Another IP Masq... (cont'd) ("Rock")
Re: Help with Telnet ("David Murray")
Re: Winblows to Linux VERY SLOW! ("David Murray")
Re: Ethernet VERY slow from Linux to Windows? ("David Murray")
Re: Opinions/Experiences with Solaris7/Intel (wrt Linux 2.2)? (Philip Brown)
appletalk - can't get interfaces (Jan CSERNOCH)
Re: Modem sharing with Samba?? ("Matthew Hager S.")
ethernet card configuration problems.. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Networking Cards and Sound Blaster 16 ("Geoff Roach")
Re: Reliable (!) nic for 2.2 kernel? (bryan)
Perl and smbfs cllient ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: fault-tolerance on linux servers? ("Jeff Howard")
Re: IP Masquerade (Aaron Baugher)
linux support for 3C980B-TX Server NIC ???? ("B. van den Berg")
Re: Networking question HELP! ("Curt")
Linux PC on a Windows NT network. Simple question(?) (Al)
Re: compuserve on Linux (Clifford Kite)
Re: Tape Backup software (Michael Perry)
Re: Route and network broadcasts (Clifford Kite)
Re: ethernet card configuration problems.. ("Curt")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MediaOne Cable Modem
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 16:47:23 GMT
In article <ussY2.4219$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Bob Pucko Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I also have mediaone, and it works fine and dandy wow
>> that tech was an ass. I e-mail a tech before and he
>. told me yes and he helped me a little but on his private
>> account. Its easy not big problem just have DNS
>> client running and your set.
=============
Are you doing this w/ MediaOne in the Chicago area? It's sounds like
what I need to do, to. My access is up and running but I can't get any
names to resolve, so I can't use a browser!
I'll try and set up DNS client myself - hope that solve it. I've been
trying for 3 weeks to get this to work!
Let me know if you have any pointers - Thanks!
Timo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: Jan CSERNOCH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: printing to a apple laserwriter from my linux-box
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 15:10:29 +0200
rupi wrote:
> hi!
>
> I have problems to print to a AppleLaser from my linux-box
> netatalk is installed and works, nbplkup finds the printer correctly,
> sending ps-files per "pap -p "printername" filename" works also.
> The question is how to tell the lpd using this printer? There are
> pre-configured scripts to use samba-printers and net-ware but not for pap.
I had exactly the same problem for about half a year until I could solve it.
You have a Linux box and an appletalk network using an Apple printer? The
printer is not connectied directly to your machine.
http://www.giub.unibe.ch/~eugster/appleprint.html
Read this howto carefully. If you still have problems then write to me.
Currently I have a working configuration on RH5.1, but have troubel
configuring netatalk on SuSE.
Jean
------------------------------
From: "David Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ipfwadm masq
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 13:14:35 GMT
I just went through some headaches with this thing too.. I bet we had the
same problems.. Here are some things to check.
I am assuming that you have made certain your kernel contains all the
correct drivers as mentioned in the HOW-TO.. and your command you
refferenced will work, but only for that one machine you specified the IP
address for... The big catch that got me was this file:
/etc/sysconfig/network
In this file there is a line called:
FORWARD_IPV4="no"
You need to change it to "yes"
This is all it took for me and I had been doing it right all along but the
HOW-TO never once mentioned this setting. Fortunatly somebody on the
newsgroup told me about it..
--DavidM
hullsy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> HELP Please
> 2 Days later I am Still banging my head agains the table
> I have read every howto mini howto and usergroup posting I can find
>
>
> I have done to letter everything they have said and yet I can only ping
> from my linux box not the win98 boxs all the machines ping each other
> but not out onto the internet
>
> this is what ipfwadm has to say
>
> acc/m prot source destination ports
> acc/m all 192.168.1.2 anywhere n/a
------------------------------
From: "Rock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,udel.linux
Subject: Re: Another IP Masq... (cont'd)
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 12:45:03 -0400
First, thanks for the replies to the first version of this message. As
usual, I post, get a couple replies and some ideas, then it takes me a week
to get over to try things out, and I get a step further.
It was suggested more than once to check routing setup and netstat. First
off, here's the output of ifconfig when the linux box is connected to the
internet (w/o the lo):
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:5A:23:71:7B
inet addr:192.168.1.1 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:121 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:9 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
Interrupt:10 Base address:0x300
ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
inet addr:204.183.91.100 P-t-P:204.183.91.9 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING MTU:1024 Metric:1
RX packets:49 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:94 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
Memory:136f038-136f84c
All looks fine. ppp0 sets the default route at dialin. The output of route
before connecting is:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 1 eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 1 lo
And after connecting:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
ws9.dol.net * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 1 eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 1 lo
default ws9.dol.net 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 5 ppp0
And everything looks good to me (except the spacing, of course). Now,
nestat -rn not online:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
Iface
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0
eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0 lo
netstat -rn (when online):
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
Iface
204.183.91.9 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 1024 0 0
ppp0
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0
eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 204.183.91.9 0.0.0.0 UG 1024 0 0
ppp0
I noticed something here about the MSS settings -- it is different for the
local lan (1500) and the ppp0 connection (1024). I've read that mru=mru for
things to be happy, and for ppp0, they were both 552. I noticed the lan uses
1500, so tried to set mtu=mru=1500 in /etc/ppp/options, but what came out is
the above -- set at 1024.
I am still in the same situation. The lan (win9x, tcp/ip) pings each other
fine, with their gateway set as the linux box at 192.168.1.1 but when the
box connects to internet, the other machines still can't get out.
At this point, I'm suspecting the problem is the mismatched mss settings.
How can I force ppp0 to get to 1500 instead of 1024? Or should I somehow try
to change the lan settings to 552?
Again, thanks for the help so far and thanks for any further suggestions!
-ed
estewart at udel dot edu.
------------------------------
From: "David Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help with Telnet
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 13:17:11 GMT
Here is something that seems to be important.. when using the plain-jane
telnet program that comes with WIn95 (and 98, I think) Linux really likes
it if you change the term-type from "vt100" to "VT100" (capitolization
(sp?)) If I don't change this, it connect but then immediatly gets hung-up
by the Linux server.. Also, be certain you can ping the linux box from the
Win98 machine. if you can't, something else is wrong.
--DavidM
Georg Cantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<7haat3$g4i$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> I have recently installed RH 5.2 linux linked to Win 98 clients.
>
> Whenever I run telnet from the Win98 clients, I get a blank screen.
Nothing
> actually happens, the cursor just stays in the corner.
>
------------------------------
From: "David Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Winblows to Linux VERY SLOW!
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 13:20:35 GMT
> Data transfer from Linux to the Winblows machines seems to be great. An
> example is a 2.66Mb (2,793,999 bytes) file transferred to Linux took 3
> minutes and 25 seconds. The same file transferred from Linux to
> Winblows takes 25 sec. Also, I do not see an increase in collisions
> when transferring from Linux to Winblows, only the other way around.
Check the samba documentation.. I beleive there is some kind of problem
with Windows98 (but not WIndows95) that will cause this.. and there is a
setting you need to change.. I wish I could tell you what it is, but I was
just reading the documentation the other day to solve a different problem
and remember reading this same issue and how to fix it..
--DavidM
------------------------------
From: "David Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Ethernet VERY slow from Linux to Windows?
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 13:22:26 GMT
Check the samba homepage and read the docs... I was just reading them the
other day and saw this problem mentioned specifically related to Windows98
and how to fix it.. I can't remember what it is, though.. Also, another
thing is to try changing the duplex of your card.
--DavidM
Massimo Piccinetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Hello,
>
> i have a strange problem with 2 pc with Ethernet.
>
> I use Windows98 on a pc with Celeron 333 128M with an economic Ethernet
ISA Novel2000 card,
> and Linux RedHat5.2 on a Pentium 150 64M with an economic Ethernet PCI
Novel 2000 card.
>
> Using FTP (and samba, Zannet NFS, and so on...) the data transfer from
Windows to Linux is
> about 600K/sec, BUT the data transfer from Linux to Windows is about
7K/sec!!!
>
> This is a great problem, because in some situations Windows98 freeze
because of this.
>
> Another problem: when i used the command "yes" with an emulator like
Ewan, Windows95 freeze!!!
> (i have not tried it with Windows 98). I am sure that the the problem is
that such command generates
> bytes very fast, and probably Linux creates big datagrams. If i insert
some delay in the main loop
> the command works well.
>
> Maybe there are some problems with the TCP/IP implementation with Linux
or Windows?
>
> Someome can help me?
>
> Thank you.
>
> ==================================================================
> Massimo Piccinetti
> via del Ponte, 109
> 61032 Fano (Pesaro)
> ITALY
> Tel. casa: +39 721 825.826
> Tel. uff.: +39 71 73.01.116
> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> GPS: UTM 33T 342.663
> 4.854.802
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Brown)
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.sun.hardware,comp.os.linux.admin
Subject: Re: Opinions/Experiences with Solaris7/Intel (wrt Linux 2.2)?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 12 May 1999 17:47:50 GMT
On Sun, 09 May 1999 13:36:51 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>...
>BTW, I heard Solaris7/Intel had a special HTTP API
>to speed up a web server? Is this published?...since
>we are using an in-house multi-threaded HTTP server
>that might be a sweet thing.
I think rather there are some special kernel tweaks to speed up the tcp driver
for http-like transactions. Stuff you put in /etc/system.
--
[Trim the no-bots from my address to reply to me by email!]
[ Do NOT email-CC me on posts. Pick one or the other.]
--------------------------------------------------
The word of the day is sescaquintillion
------------------------------
From: Jan CSERNOCH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: appletalk - can't get interfaces
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 15:22:10 +0200
Hi!
I have touble setting up netatalk (netatalk-1.4b2+asun2.0a18.2-47) on
SuSE 6.1. When I start the daemon I am presented with:
Starting netatalk:socket: Invalid argument
atalkd: can't get interfaces, exiting.
Please help
------------------------------
From: "Matthew Hager S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb,linux.samba
Subject: Re: Modem sharing with Samba??
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 14:48:49 -0500
Don't need samba for that...
what you need to do is ensure that the linux kernel supports masquarading,
IP gateway, et al. You will want to look at the HOWTO for Masquarading at
metalab.unc.edu you will also need a Point-To-Point deamon like pppd running
on your linux box (and a compatible version running on the ISP machine).
If in doubt check the howto. http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP wonderful source
for Un*x information.
Hope this helps....
-mhs
Arash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi
> can i connect my modem to my linux box and share it with my
> MS-Windows PCs so that they can use the modem to connect to eg. an
> ISP? Can i use Samba for that?
> Do i need special software on my windows pcs? Can i use call back?
>
> Thanx,
> Arash :-)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ethernet card configuration problems..
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 11:09:43 -0400
Hi,
I was running RH 5.0 and had no problems autoprobing for my ethernet
card (an NE2000 compatible). RH 5.2, however won't find the card. I've
tried passing it the "ether=11,0x280,0,0,eth0" through LILO, no luck.
During boot up it says it's delaying eth0 initialization. Any
suggestions?
Thanks,
Aaron
------------------------------
From: "Geoff Roach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Networking Cards and Sound Blaster 16
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 09:27:54 -0700
Last night, I upgraded from RH 5.2 to RH 6.0. I am still new at Linux, so
before I got too deep, I though I would make the switch.
The primary driver was my inability to get networking to run and to get my
Soundblaster 16 card to work. After I installed 6.0 and after reading
through this newsgroup, there seems to be some big problem about SB16 cards
interfering with network cards. On RH6.0, there is a HOWTO on SB16 that
seems like a pretty complex and over 2 years old. Basically, the SB16 card
seems to blow away the network config.
Anyone run into the same problem and have a simple solution? Simple means
"no changing source and re-compiling kernels". I may just switch sounds
cards with a windows PC. I am hoping the problem us SB16 specific.
------------------------------
From: bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Reliable (!) nic for 2.2 kernel?
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 13:58:19 GMT
In comp.os.linux.networking Leslie Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
: Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: >> : there's a 10/100 switch which i have set to 100.
: >>
: >> sounds like a single mode hub (choose 1: 10 or 100, and everyone on
: >> the hub MUST speak that speed. right?)
: >
: >yes. exactly.
: >
: [...]
: >i only have 2 computers. they are both in 100/full duplex mode.
: If you are using a hub you have to use half duplex. Full duplex
: only works with switches.
not always true. depends on the implementation.
I believe the bay net small 10/100 hub will support 100/full and even
10/full on its ports.
--
Bryan
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Perl and smbfs cllient
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 17:36:44 GMT
This may or may not be a Perl specific question but here it is:
I have Red Hat 5.2 running smbmount to an NT server. There is a file
on the NT server that is constantly being updated. I need to write a
program to gather the latest changes. I figure perl would be good for
this.
I started with the most basic function, to display the size of the file
once a second.
#!/usr/bin/perl
while(1) {
print -s '/mnt/nt/myfile.txt';
print "\n";
sleep 1;
}
But it the result is always the same, even though the file size is
actually increasing, perl does not seem to know it. I have also played
around with it. I found out that if I type "ls" on another terminal,
the program then displays the correct size. It seems that "ls" is
refreshing the directory kind like F5 in NT.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Peter Liu
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: "Jeff Howard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: fault-tolerance on linux servers?
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 09:09:08 -0500
Yes. They're all standard intranet services (DNS, HTTP, FTP, RADIUS,
etc...).
Claude wrote in message <7hbc7s$c6g$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> (Random crashes, etc) 3: The services running on the NT servers are
>> mission-critical.
>
>Can u get those same applications (services) for linux ?
>
>Claude
>
>
------------------------------
Subject: Re: IP Masquerade
From: Aaron Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 12 May 1999 07:45:48 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan Ling) writes:
> I am a newbie to computer and I have got IP Masquerade up and
> running. However, I cannot telnet from machine A to machine B
> when I set the default gateway of machine B to A. The reason
> of setting it this way is because machine A has the ppp conncetion.
Post the results of 'netstat -rn' on both machines (before deleting
any routes). Also, does telnet fail completely, or does it just take
a couple of minutes to connect? You might also post your ipfwadm
rules, if they aren't more than several lines.
Aaron
--
Aaron Baugher - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Quincy, IL, USA
Extreme Systems Consulting - http://haruchai.rnet.com/esc/
CGI, Perl, Java, and Linux/Unix Administration
------------------------------
From: "B. van den Berg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linux support for 3C980B-TX Server NIC ????
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 16:09:50 -0700
Does anyone know if Linux supports the 3Com 980B-TX
server nic, with the 802.1Q VLAN Tagging option ??
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Networking question HELP!
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 13:41:14 -0500
Not enough info. Could be alot of things. DNS, routing, firewall filters
...
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:7hcet0$g1h$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> hi all,
>
> I have a very urgent question.
>
> we have cisco router at our end and a cisco router at a clients end.
> (cisco 2500 series)
>
> and for some reason teh clien can't see his own website whereas teh
> whoel world can. and the client cannot see any of the websites which
> are being hosted by us either.
>
> is it a IP / SUBNETTING problem..I will appreciate any answers.
>
> thanks
> praniti
>
>
> --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
> ---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Al)
Subject: Linux PC on a Windows NT network. Simple question(?)
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 10:08:33 -0400
Hi. I'm new to networking and Linux, but for the obvious reasons I'd
like to incorporate Linux into my firm.
Step 1 is to place a Linux PC onto a Windows NT network in which the
other client PCs run Win95. The Linux PC, of course, would like to use
printers, modems, etc. of the network, as well as access to some data
files on the server.
Instead of spinning my wheels, can anyone point me in the right direction
as to books or other resources I could use to research this?
Thanks.
V.
PS. remove the "X's" to email me directly.
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: compuserve on Linux
Date: 12 May 1999 08:28:16 -0500
Helio63A ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Compuserve,AOL, anything that uses it's own software to connect to the internet
: cannot work in Linux unless someone decides to take it upon themselves to port
: said software into Linux. (HIGHLY doubtful..ever) As for me...well..AOL aint
: grand, but it's free..(for me at the moment..being a poor student and all)
Well, not quite. I have an old post saved that tells how to connect
to CompuServe which I can send or post on request. I do think you're
right about AOL though.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Perry)
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,hk.comp.os.linux,tw.bbs.comp.linux
Subject: Re: Tape Backup software
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 14:06:06 -0700
On Tue, 11 May 1999 08:21:06 +0200, Wolfgang Ganzert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>For the KDE window environment there is the kdat program. It allows
>multiple tars on a single tape and has a GUI which is easy to use. On my
>systems it does not run stable but maybe this is because I'm using KDE
>1.0. Maybe with 1.1 the problem is fixed, I don't known.
>
>Wolfgang
>
>Ron Flory wrote:
>
>> > I'm looking for a very easy & good DAT tape backup software.
>> > Any idea?
>>
>> depends how fancy it needs to be. 'cat file.tar.gz > /dev/st0' works
>> fine for me.
>>
>> ron
>
I would also sugggest taking a look at the taper program which is freely
available. It ships with SuSE I believe and is also offered as an rpm file
at the rpm archive sites. I have also used xbru and bru and they work quite
well with my Exabyte 8mm tape drive.
All of these and more at www.xnet.com/~blatura/linapps.shtml BTW.
--
Michael Perry, Project Engineer
Linuxcare, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.linuxcare.com
Linuxcare. At the center of Linux.
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: Route and network broadcasts
Date: 12 May 1999 08:44:41 -0500
Jon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I am trying to support some programs on the WINTEL boxes. They try and find
: other clients by broadcasting to 255.255.255.255 and I would like this to be
: routed accross the subnets.
If the Win boxes are all on the same subnet, say 90.0.0.0, then I wonder
if something like this on the gateway between the networks would work:
route add 255.255.255.255 gw 90.0.1.1 eth0
assuming that the IP address of the non-Win side of the gateway is
90.0.1.1 .
Comments welcome, I'm no expert on routing.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* The signal-to-noise ratio is too low in many [news] groups to make
* them good candidates for archiving.
* --- Mike Moraes, Answers to FAQs about Usenet */
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ethernet card configuration problems..
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 13:48:38 -0500
Try adding the following to your /etc/conf.modules
options eth0 io=0x280 irq=11
alias eth0 ne
Passing arguments via lilo only works if you've compiled the driver into the
kernel.
Are you sure you've set the ne2000 board to be at 0x280 and irq 11?
Usually need to use the DOS
based config software that came with your board. Make sure PnP is disabled
as well.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> I was running RH 5.0 and had no problems autoprobing for my ethernet
> card (an NE2000 compatible). RH 5.2, however won't find the card. I've
> tried passing it the "ether=11,0x280,0,0,eth0" through LILO, no luck.
> During boot up it says it's delaying eth0 initialization. Any
> suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
