Linux-Networking Digest #130, Volume #12 Fri, 6 Aug 99 08:13:38 EDT
Contents:
Re: Desperate problem, aliased ip randomly fails (Barry Hill)
Troubles with a mail server on the RH6 (BOUDOT)
Re: controling access to port by IP# ? (Roope Anttinen)
Re: Kill -9 won't kill a process (Jason Simpson)
Re: black addresses (Markus)
Extending the IP range on a Linux box ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
How to update the DNS from the dhcp.conf ("Lars Jeppesen")
2 default routes, which one is used? (Barry Hill)
ping on multi homed host (Bernard van Biljon)
Re: Switch to ProFTPD, root dirs? (max)
Netscape problems (MBehun7799)
Problems with netatalk ("Jacques Daleas")
Re: FIREWALL/PROXY ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
dial in server -- pppd help needed (Braam)
Re: PPP Problem (W.G. Unruh)
Re: PPP (Dial-out) connection requirements (W.G. Unruh)
SMC switches & Full duplex (David Kelly)
Re: 2 default routes, which one is used? ("Ronny Lampert")
Re: Multi-homed Lunix box. HELP! (Cornel Popescu)
Re: route command hangs (Cornel Popescu)
Re: ftpd problems? ("Ronny Lampert")
Re: ppp compression question (W.G. Unruh)
Re: Netscape problems ("Gene Heskett")
Re: LAN Telnet logins allowed, Internet not allowed (Cornel Popescu)
Re: Cable modem dynamic IP (Bob Tennent)
News Forwarder (Michael Hamm)
Re: Sendmail: relaying denied ("Marvin (Georg Ortmanns)")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Barry Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Desperate problem, aliased ip randomly fails
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 09:30:36 GMT
Hi,
Barry Hill wrote:
> Randomly, one of these virtual IPs will not respond, i.e. no response =
I think I=B4ve solved it myself: In case anyone is interested, here=B4s a=
description:
Our provider moved our machine to a new network, because a router on the
old one was playing up. Unfortunately, the old default route (with the
buggy router) was left in the route.conf, so some datagrams went via
this route and couldn=B4t get out. Since removing them (last night) there=
have been no problems. =
=18
Bye,
Barry
------------------------------
From: BOUDOT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: redhat.config,redhat.networking.general
Subject: Troubles with a mail server on the RH6
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 09:30:39 GMT
Hello,
I have to make a intranet ( web and mail ). I also have a site on the net.
I want to get my mails from two POP accounts ( 4 aliases per account ) and
dispatch them to the users of my intranet.
Here is the troubles encountered :
1. On a Windows 98 station, the Outlook client waits a long time and never
gets the mails from the Linux server. If I have no internet connection (
PPP ) it works if the 'named' deamon is killed. If I configure the
internet connection ( addind ppp interface and nameserver in resolv.conf
), I can use fetchmail, but the outlook ( i tried a direct telnet
connection on port 110 too ) waits 60 seconds and never gets mails if i'm
not connected to the net ( ppp is down). If ppp is up, outlook gets mails
immediately.
2. How to use aliases with fetchmail.
eg. POP account boudot, with aliases al1,al2 and al3. I have 4 mail
adresses boudot@xxx, al1@xxx, al2@xxx and al3@xxx
I have 4 users in linux ( boudot, al1, al2 and al 3) and i want fetchmail
to dispatch mails from POP boudot to the four users.
Hope someone will help ...
================== Posted via CNET Linux Help ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: Roope Anttinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: controling access to port by IP# ?
Date: 6 Aug 1999 09:43:49 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Otavio Exel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to run a small webserver (dhttpd) on port 81; it is supposed to
> serve somewhat sensitive internal documentation so I'd like to allow
> access to it only for a given range of ip numbers;
with 2.0.x kernels "man ipfwadm", with 2.2.x kernels "man ipchains".
Roope
--
MicroSoft? is that some kind of a toilet paper?
PS: Look for address here, not from headers. And remove NOSPAM's
___________________________________________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+358 9 812 7567 / +358 500 445 565 / +358 49 445 565
http://myy.helia.fi/~anttiner/index.html
===========================================================================
Helsinki Business Polytechnic - Institute of information technology
------------------------------
From: Jason Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Kill -9 won't kill a process
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 03:41:19 -0600
Hello.
I have been getting this problem regularly under Mandrake 6.0. My typical
resolution is switch from X to command mode (CTRL-ALT-F2), log in, do a ''ps -A''
to show ALL the processes, and kill the X server. As I boot to GUI mode, what
this does is force a reset of the X-windows environment. Unfortunately, this
leaves me with the drawback of not allowing the filesystem to cleanly unmount and
I spend some time waiting for the boot process to clean up the drive the next time
I turn on the computer. But while it is still on, it works.
Jason
> SAW> Sung Kim wrote:
>
> >> I am currently running redhat6.0 with kernel 2.2.10 on a P-400.
> >> Everything runs fine except for one exception. Especially in X when a
> >> process crashes it remains in memory and no matter what I try I can't
> >> kill it. I have tried killing them as root and nothing. Even when I
> >> reboot the machine linux can't unmount the filesystem due to the
> >> locked/linked files. Is there anyway to kill these processes or is my
> >> kernel not compiled correctly?
> >>
> >> Tx for your time.
> >>
> >> Sung Kim
------------------------------
From: Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: black addresses
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 09:17:13 +0200
Hello Shane!
Do you mean that I should set up these services(ipfwadm and ipchains) on
my catvs server? The thing is that we are not allowed to mess around
with their server...
Cheers,
Markus
Shane Chrisp wrote:
>
> You may even setup some form of port forwarding using something like ipfwadm
> or ipchains this will allow you to redirect a particular port from the real
> address of the pc connected to the net to an internal pc.
>
> Shane Chrisp
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hello!
> > Does anybody know if it is possible to connect to a computer on a
> > network where all the computers have "black" addresses (they are not
> > valid on the real net). All the computers on our network use the
> > gateways ip address, hence maybe 50 computers share an ip address out to
> > the net, but inside the network all computers have different adresses.
> > But if I have a computer outsied our network, how can I get into a
> > specific computer inside the network? For example to ftp from outside
> > the network into a compter in the network.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Markus
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Extending the IP range on a Linux box
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 07:48:49 GMT
Dear newsgroup users,
This question is regarding Linux (2.0.35). In our client's office there
is a Linux box that serves as a gateway to 16 IP's x.y.z.224 -
x.y.z.239. Now we want to add 16 more IP's: x.y.z.240 - x.y.z.254 ...
hmmm, actually 15 more IP's.
The question is: what setting/files do I have to change? And would my
task be the same if the new set of IP's is not neighbouring the old set?
Thanks for the help,
Sleiman
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Lars Jeppesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How to update the DNS from the dhcp.conf
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 11:59:52 +0200
Hi
I just want to make my life a bit easier.
I have some hosts with static ip's defined in the dhcp.conf.
I just need a script to generate the zone file from dhcp.conf
So, when I add/remove a host, I could simply add it to dhcp.conf
and the run this script.
Thanks in advance
Lars Jeppesen
------------------------------
From: Barry Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 2 default routes, which one is used?
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 09:30:46 GMT
Hi,
If one enters two default routes in the Linux routing table, which one
does the kernel use as standard: the first, the fastest, the least busy
one or a random one?
Bye,
Barry
------------------------------
From: Bernard van Biljon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ping on multi homed host
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 10:18:18 +0200
Hello
I have a Linux box set up with two ethernet cards.
eth0 :192.168.0.3
eth1 :192.168.0.4
How can I ping from one interface to the other ?
ie : I want eth0 to send the ping to eth1 out on the network and then
receive the reply back over the network.
When you just ping ( lets say ping 192.168.0.3) you end up pinging the
localhost, the ping never goes out on the network.
Thanks
Bernard van Biljon
Pretoria, South Africa
"I hear them scratching at the door" - Sisters of Mercy
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (max)
Subject: Re: Switch to ProFTPD, root dirs?
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 10:03:48 +0200
hi,
> <Anonymous ~ftp>
> User ftp
> Group ftp
> "put what ever else you want here"
> </Anonymous>
> hope this helps. I just spent a little time playing around with proftpd and
> like it cuz it is similar to Apache.
How do you give users access to their home dirs?
Must be I'm stupid, cause I've not figured it out yet.
Thanks,
Manfred
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MBehun7799)
Subject: Netscape problems
Date: 06 Aug 1999 06:27:25 GMT
I have Red Hat Linux 5.2 with Netscape Communicator 4.6.
After I get online and try to launch Netscape I get the following error:
xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server
xlib: client is not authorized to connect to server
Error: can't open display :0.0
I can't find out what's wrong , please help.
------------------------------
From: "Jacques Daleas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problems with netatalk
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 10:27:30 +0200
We own this net server "poweredge 2300" from dell operated on Linux RedHat
6.0 by samba and netatalk.
Netatalk causes an error :
error message = eth0 : transmit timed out : status 0050 0000 at
501/516 command
00000000
This error shuts off all net services that make le server out of net.
This error never occurs when netatalk is disabled.
Can you help me ?
Thanks.
Dal�as Jacques
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FIREWALL/PROXY
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 10:32:57 GMT
Have you enabled masquerading on B ?
ipfwadm -F -a accept -m -S 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0 -d 0.0.0.0
this and ipforwarding should make it.
If you have problems with masquerading, see
http://www.tsmservices.com/masq/
or IP-masquerading howto ...
On the other hand, you don't need to change anything on A :-)
Best regards,
Cornel Popescu
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
David Hopkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, the setup:
>
> A(router to ISP) B(rh linux 5.2
> (2.0.36)) C(40 win95 clients)
> |
> | |
> 222.55.1.41-----222.55.1.42eth0 192.168.1.1eth1------192.168.1.2,
> 192.168.1.3, etc.
>
> A's mask is 255.255.255.248 as is eth0 of B. C and eth1 of B share a
> mask of 255.255.255.0. IPfwding is enabled on B and my routing table
> looks like the following:
>
> Destination GW Genmask Flags
> Iface
> 222.55.1.40 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248 U eth0
> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U eth1
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U
> lo
> default 222.55.1.41 0.0.0.0 UG
> eth0
>
> I'm trying to use B as a firewall/proxy, but cannot get outside--I
> cannot ping A from B or from any clients on C. I've tried many
things,
> but now feel like I am missing something simple. One additional
note,
> I cannot change any configuration on A. It is controlled by our ISP.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Braam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: dial in server -- pppd help needed
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 12:43:15 +0200
Hi,
I have a mail/web server connected to the internet via a lan.
I have set up pppd to configure the server as a dialup server.
I dial up from a win95/98 client to this server.
I dial in with the client, log in, and then run pppd.
The client is then assigned an IP address.
Now I can ping the server from the client and download mail etc.
The problem is I cannot go further out of the server onto the LAN to
surf the web etc.
Proxyarp in the ppp options is used.
What should I do to get outside the server on the LAN ?
Pls help !
Braam
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W.G. Unruh)
Subject: Re: PPP Problem
Date: 6 Aug 99 10:46:03 GMT
Jesse Keeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>passes the password along. Then a serial connection is established and
>ppp0 is to be connected to /dev/cua0. At this point, pppd says that
>"Serial line is looped back." and the connection is terminated and pppd
>exits. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Develop good habits and use /dev/ttyS0 rather than /dev/cua0
But that message means tht he remote end is not ready to negotiate ppp but
rather is just echoing what you send it. You may need to do something like
enter a
ppp
or pppd command after you log on. They may send a message telling you.
Put in an expect ppp into your chat script and see what the remote end send
you after the login.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W.G. Unruh)
Subject: Re: PPP (Dial-out) connection requirements
Date: 6 Aug 99 10:38:26 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>(i) My connection breaks after an hour or so. May be its beacause during
>this time the system was idle. Its not bcaz of my ISP because my Win95
>PC connected to the same ISP keeps the connection alive for days. Any
>suggestion - Any option that may be causing this I am not using the
>'idle' option but using 'persist'.
Win may well be periodically sending something down the line to make the other
end think it is not idle.
>(ii) I need an X-Application that would give me the status of the PPPD /
>MODEM. Does DialD has this interface.
diald dials out if there is any packet which needs to be sent down the line.
Ie it does not tie up the line and the ISP's modems while still making it
transparent to connect.
>Do you consider 'diald' as a better option - if yes why ?
------------------------------
From: David Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.networking
Subject: SMC switches & Full duplex
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 09:37:49 +0200
Hi,
I have several SMC EZ 108DT switches. My problem is that they don't
appear to work in full duplex mode. I am using cat 5 cable and have
tried with various network cards with no success. Anybody out there come
across this before? Any ideas as to what I can do?
Best regards,
David
--
David Kelly - Network Engineer - Samara Services
Zimbabwe's Finest Internet Service Provider
http://www.mindpower.co.zw
Tel: +263 4 708056 Fax: +263 4 708055
------------------------------
From: "Ronny Lampert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 2 default routes, which one is used?
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 13:06:02 +0200
Hy
>If one enters two default routes in the Linux routing table, which one
>does the kernel use as standard: the first, the fastest, the least busy
.
..
...
Think a bit, the word DEFAULT implies there can only be ONE, doesn't it ?
RLA
------------------------------
From: Cornel Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Multi-homed Lunix box. HELP!
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 10:55:05 GMT
Login as root, edit /etc/lilo.conf and add:
append="ether=9,0x280,eth0 ether=10,0x300,eth1"
right after the lines
image=/boot/vmlinuz-xxxxxxxxxxx
label=xxxxxxxxx
root=/dev/hda1
read-only
Save, then run lilo and reboot.
Cornel
In article <7ocirc$l7e$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have an Intel machine with two identical ISA NE*000 compatible
> network cards. I am having trouble getting the system to recognize
both
> at the same time. One of them is at io=0x300 IRQ=10, and the other is
> io=0X280 IRQ=9. I have enabled the ne modules in /etc/rc.d/rc.modules.
> Here is an example of the entries in rc.modules:
> /sbin/modprobe ne io=0x280 irq=9
> /sbin/modprobe ne io=0x300 irq=10
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Cornel Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: route command hangs
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 11:04:55 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just trying to get a NE2000 compatible ethernet card to work. I've
> checked all the settings with ifconfig and route, and everything is
> set. There are no problems with the irqs or i/o addresses but when I
> use route the command hangs for quite some time before it responds.
> Plus I can't telnet or ping or anything, even though the card is
> recognized at boot time and up and running with the correct ip address
> and routing tables? Any guesses? I really think that the hangup in
the
> route command points to a problem, if I remove all the routes but the
> loopback interface the command runs quickly.
Try route -n or netstat -rn
Prolly your default gateway is not the right one ... make sure the
default route is ok. If you can't ping names then your DNS is not ok, if
you can't ping even IP's then maybe cables ...
Cornel
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Ronny Lampert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ftpd problems?
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 13:19:22 +0200
Hy,
>Unfortunately, I don't remember what I changed, or if I changed anything,
>but after a couple days I tried again, and I got right in on the user
>account I had previously set up and then given up on.
>>
>>two, ftp requests get the following:
>>
>>Connected to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
>>421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection
>>
Jup, RH seems not to install wu-ftp per default; do this by
rpm -i wu-ftpd-<etc...> on your RH CD in dir Redhat/RPMS
or make sure it is already installed:
rpm -q wu-ftpd
Should be solved by this. If not, try to run wu-ftpd manually AND/OR check
/etc/hosts.allow and hosts.deny.
Bye
RLA
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W.G. Unruh)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: ppp compression question
Date: 6 Aug 99 10:41:44 GMT
Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I've been having a problem configuring ppp compression with my ISP. I have
>'defalte 11,0' and bsdcomp 11,0' in my /etc/ppp/options file. Problem is,
Why??? All modems these days compress already. Adding another layer of
compression actually makes things worse not better. ( a compressed compressed file is
usually longer, not shorter, due to compression overhead)
You do not need those lines, or any compression. They are holdovers from the
days of slow, non-compressing modems. (except I guess some cable modems
these days do not compress, and it may be useful there-- but then pppd
tries to negotiate compression anyway without you getting in the way.)
>sometimes this works (my ISP accepts it), sometimes it does not (a lot of
>ComfReq/ConfRej followed by 'CCP: timeout sending Config-Requests' in my
>logfile). Do I need to use 'noccp' in /etc/ppp/options, and does this
>automatically disable all compression? Or will the compression still work
>(I know, a potentially stupid question, but I'm not sure). I've tried using
>using both deflate and bsdcomp on their own, as well as different values
>for the compression; the inconsistancies remain.
>
>I have pppd 2.3.7 and kernel 2.2.10.
>
>Many thanks.
>------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
Date: 06 Aug 99 06:39:33 -0500
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Netscape problems
Unrot13 this;
Reply to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gene Heskett sends Greetings to MBehun7799 ;
> I have Red Hat Linux 5.2 with Netscape Communicator 4.6.
> After I get online and try to launch Netscape I get the following
> error:
> xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server
> xlib: client is not authorized to connect to server
> Error: can't open display :0.0
> I can't find out what's wrong , please help.
Sounds like a permissions problem, either your login or netscape. I'm
not having anything like that with 4.61/128bit-ssl.
The server is the x windows server that should be running. You are
running x aren't you?
Cheers, Gene
--
Gene Heskett, CET, UHK |Amiga A2k Zeus040 50 megs fast/2 megs chip
Ch. Eng. @ WDTV-5 |A2091,GuruRom,1g Seagate,CDROM,Multiface III
|Buddha + 4 gig WDC drive, 525 meg tape
|Stylus Pro, EnPrint, Picasso-II, 17" vga
RC5-Moo! 690kkeys/sec isn't much, but it all helps
email gene underscore heskett at iolinc dot net
--
------------------------------
From: Cornel Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: redhat.networking.general
Subject: Re: LAN Telnet logins allowed, Internet not allowed
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 11:20:12 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Amir Malik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My LAN: 192.168.0.1, 192.168.0.2, 192.168.0.3, 192.168.0.4
> The .2 machine is the ftp/www/webserver and on it I would also like to
> provide Telnet service only to the machines on my LAN, but I want to
block
> it from the rest of the world. I believe this can be controlled in
> the /etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny files.
/etc/hosts.deny
in.telnetd: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0
/etc/hosts.allow
in.telnetd: localnet_addr/localnet_mask
man hosts.allow for details ...
On the other hand, if .2 is the firewall then you can block incoming
telnet to it by using firewall rules. If not, restricting telnet to
internal network is kinda useless (.2 is not accesible from outside-you
use nonroutable IP's), unless you forward telnet from firewall to .2
(which is not a good idea anyway)
Cornel
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Tennent)
Subject: Re: Cable modem dynamic IP
Date: 6 Aug 1999 11:26:06 GMT
Reply-To: rdt(a)cs.queensu.ca
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999 00:18:44 -0400, Michael Longval MD wrote:
>
>My problem is that the cable company says that they use dynamic IPs for
>the cable modems' connection to the internet. This SEEMS to me to prevent
>me from entering my server via another connection to the internet.
>
>Is there a way around this, without purchasing THEIR solution (a
>COMMERCIAL access plan with FIXED IP address at much HIGHER rates)
>
I have a cable connection that uses dhcp but the IP address
stays the same for months at a time. So don't assume that
your IP address will be changing daily. If it does, you
should have your box send each new IP address to a fixed place
that you have access to, using ftp or mail. There are
commercial operations that provide this service. There may also
be free services; at one time ez-ip provided this, but they've
given it up I believe. But if you have a login at a fixed
address somewhere, you can use that.
Bob T.
------------------------------
From: Michael Hamm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: News Forwarder
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 13:23:06 +0200
hi,
i like to run a News-Forwarder on a Linux-Applikation-Gateway.
So,
is there a News-Forwarder or a News-Proxy around??
Thanks for any help
Michael
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 12:24:40 +0200
From: "Marvin (Georg Ortmanns)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sendmail: relaying denied
Chip Transisto wrote:
> put local machine ip in /etc/mail/access or /etc/mail/relay-domains.
> If local machine is 192.168.0.2, put that in or 192.168
>
> >"relaying denied".
Thank's, it works :-) Aditionally I had to do
makemap hash /etc/mail/access.db < /etc/mail/access
to create the database file.
--
Regards
Georg Ortmanns (Marvin) eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To get my PGP key send mail with subject "Send PGP key"
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
