Linux-Networking Digest #149, Volume #11 Fri, 14 May 99 03:14:03 EDT
Contents:
Re: Cellular modem on Linux ? ("Olexa Riznyk")
Re: @HOME Cable Service and Linux (Adam Haeder)
Re: Help me...I've been hacked! (Paul D. Smith)
Re: Usernet 'configuration' (Steve Hall)
Re: MediaOne Cable Modem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
ipfwadm, DNS, and masq - policy ? (Braxton Burrsaddle)
Re: Using Linux as router (please help) ("K.A. Steensma")
Re: Using Linux as router (please help) ("K.A. Steensma")
HELP PLEASE!! Info, links and tips wanted to setup a mail server behind router
(Savas Pavlidis)
Netatalk, zones, and macs, oh my! ("Phillip Mather")
Re: dual line modems ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: pap authentication failure Help.. ("Gene Heskett")
Re: DNS blues... (Jamie)
Problems detecting EtherExpress 16 (Matthew Crema)
Re: IP Masquerading on 2.2 ("TURBO1010")
Various web server questions... (Brendan Byrd/SineSwiper)
DNS? (DB7654321)
r-tools only work when I'm logged-on as root (Jack Donohue)
Best Nework Cards (mike)
Re: 2 NIC in same IP segment (Alexander Verhaar)
Re: samba and Win98 ("David L. Courtney")
Help : Very Slow Remote Login (brian)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Olexa Riznyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.cellular.gsm,alt.cellular,alt.cellular-phone-tech
Subject: Re: Cellular modem on Linux ?
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 00:27:59 +0300
Reply-To: "Olexa Riznyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi!
Robert Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am about to buy a new cellular phone but would like to learn of
> experiences Linux users have had with cellular modems.
>
> The official phone sites (e.g. www.nokia.com ) say windows is a
> pre-requisite but this is not an option for me.
>
> Do you get an AT prompt with a cellular modem or are they winmodems ?
You could get AT prompt with at least Nokia 8810, 7110; Ericsson SH 888.
You _could_not_ get AT prompt with Nokia 61XX, 51XX because these phones
require sofware modem emulation.
> I would also like to be able to manage the address book on the phone. Is
> this done with AT commands or is proprietry software required ?
You could manage phone book with AT commands.
Best wishes!
Olexa Riznyk
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Adam Haeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: @HOME Cable Service and Linux
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 05:28:26 GMT
Christopher Wiley wrote:
> Scott,
>
> I've been running IP Masquerading on Slackware 3.6 at my house with the @Home
> service since December with no problems.
I've got a similar setup running here in Omaha, NE through @home
-snip-
> "Joseph D. Carvalho" wrote:
>
> >
> > What I do know is they will shut you down if you attempt to run a server
> > across their lan/wan. The teeny-tiny print in your contract with them says
> > so.
> > They never filtered any of my traffic, but when they found I was running a
> > pseudo commercial server, BANG! Service suspended and subsequent
> > nastygram to cease in the mail.
Are you sure about that? I read the contract pretty closely, and it says they
don't care what servers you run, but you agree to not hold them resonsible for
the content you offer or expect any support from them about it. My contract
doesn't say anything about restricting the content that I offer on my web server.
I've had good luck with the setup, never had any down time (that was Cox's
fault).
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul D. Smith)
Subject: Re: Help me...I've been hacked!
Date: 14 May 1999 01:33:25 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%% [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
wx> With the advent of ssh, all prior security guidelines need to be
wx> modified. `su` [except as root] is *bad*. passwords are *bad*. RSA
wx> authentication is *good*.
Please take a close look at the ssh license before you start to use it.
Ssh2, in particular, has a license so restrictive that to call it a
"free" license is laughable.
Ssh1 is better, but still problematic for some situations.
And of course, RSA is under patent in the U.S.A. until next fall, so
there are restrictions on what you can do with it.
Encryption and authentication over the 'Net are *good*. Violating the
license of the software is *illegal*. Illegal is *bad*.
--
===============================================================================
Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Management Development
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
===============================================================================
These are my opinions---Nortel Networks takes no responsibility for them.
------------------------------
From: Steve Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Usernet 'configuration'
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 22:27:54 -0400
FYI : If anyone else had this problem, my chat-ppp0 file required this :
'CONNECT' '\d\c'
instead of
'CONNECT' ' '
It works great - now onto the delights of demand dialling...
SH
Prasanth Kumar wrote:
> Did you try using the "netcfg" gui interface to configure the dialup?
>
> Steve Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I've (finally) got my PPP connection to my ISP working (RH5.2) -
> > hurrah! Unfortunately i have to type this huge command in to start the
> > connection every time :
> >
> > /usr/sbin/pppd /dev/modem 115200 debug user bk875 connect
> > "/usr/sbin/chat -v '' AT OK ATD5551234 CONNECT '\d\c'"
> >
> > I'd like to use the 'quick-n-easy' Usernet app to turn ppp on/off but
> > using this does not seem to generate quite the right options for pppd.
> > What files control the options passed to pppd & chat via Usernet. I'd
> > have thought /etc/ppp/options,
> > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ppp0 and chat-ppp0 were the ones
> > but this doesn't quite ring true.
> >
> > Forgive this probably rather stupid question but i'm still learning!
> > Alternatively if anyone knows a better way to start/stop PPP (on
> > demand/startup) please point me in that direction!
> >
> > Many thanks
> >
> > Steve H
> >
> >
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MediaOne Cable Modem
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 00:38:56 -0500
my two cents to this:
when mediaone one came and installed the modem through windows, it worked
and blah blah.. so as they were leaving, i rebooted (running redhat 5.2
with 2.2.6) and set up eth0 for dhcp (as per the dhcp/cable modem
mini-howto's).. unfortunately, the tech for mediaone forgot to mention
about my user account, my mail password, etc, so i called up mediaone and
asked them about that info, *while on linux*
he gave me the information, and (knowing that mediaone chicago, or any
mediaone as far as i knew, didnt support linux) i asked him
"do you know if i can run the cable modem while on linux?"
mediaone- "um.. linux? is that the new operating system going around?"
me- "something like that"
(remember, i'm on linux while talking to him)
mediaone- "i dont know anything about that, i dont think you can. we only
support windows right now"
me - "ok, i was just wondering"
i dont know if it's just them trying to cover their asses or what, but i
had a good laugh anyways
cheers
carlos
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Braxton Burrsaddle)
Subject: ipfwadm, DNS, and masq - policy ?
Date: 14 May 1999 03:23:17 GMT
I have DNS and masquerading running on the gateway for my network,
which consists of fourteen NT machines, one os/2 machine and the
gateway Linux box (SuSE 6.0, kernel 2.0.36). When ipfwadm policies O
and I are set to accept, everything works. DNS requests are handled
locally or forwarded to the ISP via diald. However, if I set ipfwadm
policies for F, I, and O all to deny as default I have yet to find a
set of added rules that allow DNS requests to be forwarded. That is,
I haven't discovered a rule set that allows the DNS forwarding to
bring up diald and go to the ISP's nameserver. DNS still works
locally but hangs when it can't get out to the big nameserver. This
behavior obtains whether the query is performed from the gateway's
console or a remote machine.
What is the minimum cut-set of rules added to 'deny' policies that
will allow DNS forwarding to bring up diald and get out to answer the
request?
TIA-
Greg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : reply-to bogus, remove z's to construct email
address.
When you have enough clowns, you have a circus.
------------------------------
From: "K.A. Steensma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Using Linux as router (please help)
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 03:29:23 GMT
Go to the following -
http://www.linuxrouter.org/modmaker/
There is not a lot of documentation, but as a minimum you should have -
(thanks to John Heenan for the following)
You need to ensure the following kernel modules are loaded (actualy the
last is not needed) with LRP.
serial
slhc
ppp
bsd_comp
If you are using modems then a pppd command is configured to use the chat
command to dial out.
If you are acepting dialins through a modem then you need a program that
will answer the call and spawn a pseudo terminal. For modem lines you can
use mgetty or portslave (portslave does not have to use a radius server).
Portslave is an LRP package.
If you do not use modems then you need to start up raw telnet session
(secure shell might work in a suitable mode) through the serial link
between the two routers. Following this you can run pppd at both ends.
Keith
"Avelino Santa Ana Jr." wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "K.A. Steensma"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Take a look at -
> >
> > www.linuxrouter.org
> >
> > It runs on most hardware larger than a 386' and is self-contained on a
> > single 1.44M floppy.
> > (I don't even run a CPU fan or power supply fan in the unit that I have
> > running). KAS
> >
> > Aaron wrote:
> >
> > > i have 3 win 98 boxes and want get internet access through a linux box.
> > > How do i do this
> > >
> > > thanks in advance
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I have linuxrouter running on a 486 but I can't get it to recognize my
> network cards. (smc ether ez (8416) and intel etherexpress pro/10, irq
> 10, 11)
> I have all the settings typed in (I think), but it can't find the
> devices. Where am I supposed to get the modules?
>
> --
> ====Everything I do is to kill time until the next SportsCenter======
> j ;dmo 'qMHD, jiMGhp|Avelino(A.J.)Santa Ana Jr.
> d L q;' h } O ,dHMb 'M'|Sitka,AK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> rL--, ,d[ } H .aeH I |Gonzaga University '98
> j[ 7L d{|' } M B' M T, .H |ICQ# 4251114
> dM, JL dH][hm, ,dMHD' '7MHO, '7MHD' |Seattle, WA 98125
> ==http://members.home.com/a2daj====Oxymoron: Microsoft Works=========
------------------------------
From: "K.A. Steensma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Using Linux as router (please help)
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 03:34:36 GMT
Another point (that I forgot) you need to specify the address and irq for each
NIC that you are using (like mine for a NE-2000 NIC would read) -
# Generated by modules.lrp creator on www.linuxrouter.org
ext2
smbfs
ip_masq_ftp
ip_masq_irc
ip_masq_raudio
router
serial
dummy
slhc
ppp
8390
ne irq=10 io=0x300
slip
ne
"Avelino Santa Ana Jr." wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "K.A. Steensma"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Take a look at -
> >
> > www.linuxrouter.org
> >
> > It runs on most hardware larger than a 386' and is self-contained on a
> > single 1.44M floppy.
> > (I don't even run a CPU fan or power supply fan in the unit that I have
> > running). KAS
> >
> > Aaron wrote:
> >
> > > i have 3 win 98 boxes and want get internet access through a linux box.
> > > How do i do this
> > >
> > > thanks in advance
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I have linuxrouter running on a 486 but I can't get it to recognize my
> network cards. (smc ether ez (8416) and intel etherexpress pro/10, irq
> 10, 11)
> I have all the settings typed in (I think), but it can't find the
> devices. Where am I supposed to get the modules?
>
> --
> ====Everything I do is to kill time until the next SportsCenter======
> j ;dmo 'qMHD, jiMGhp|Avelino(A.J.)Santa Ana Jr.
> d L q;' h } O ,dHMb 'M'|Sitka,AK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> rL--, ,d[ } H .aeH I |Gonzaga University '98
> j[ 7L d{|' } M B' M T, .H |ICQ# 4251114
> dM, JL dH][hm, ,dMHD' '7MHO, '7MHD' |Seattle, WA 98125
> ==http://members.home.com/a2daj====Oxymoron: Microsoft Works=========
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Savas Pavlidis)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: HELP PLEASE!! Info, links and tips wanted to setup a mail server behind router
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 06:05:42 GMT
I have a router that does IP Masquarading (NAT). I have a static IP
connection to Internet. My ISP gives me the capability to store all
incoming emails and forward them on demand via ETRN. The ISP
implements POP3 for normal email download.
So I want to setup a Linux or FreeBSD Server, that primarily will
handle all emails as the central email server. All intranet emails
will be handled immediately. All outbound emails will be stored and
forwarded
on a schedule (every 3 hours). During that connection (every 3 hours),
all incoming emails should be got from ISP to our mail server.
The problem is that I am not knowledgable enough to do this without
some hints. I have searched tutorials and how-tos, and I found a large
number of programs that can do the job (or so it seems), like
fetchmail to get the emails, and sendmail or qmail to send the emails.
But in our situation the mail server is in the intranet and uses IP
address in the form 192.68.xxx.xxx and the only valid IP is the static
IP of the router. From the info I red (and red quite a lot), I havenot
found a way to surpass this problem (or so it seems).
So if anyone has made a similar setup, please give me some details, at
least some hints and the links to read to make this possible. Also if
anyone has made a DNS proxy (that caches DNS requests) the info supply
would be helpful.
Thanks in advance to anyone who takes the trouble to reply.
Savas Pavlidis
pavlidis at nettaxi dot com
------------------------------
From: "Phillip Mather" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Netatalk, zones, and macs, oh my!
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 03:37:43 GMT
Several questions.
I have a network of several G3 macs, with os 8.1. I need to setup a
netatalk server to make a zone and do the routeing. I have looked over
doc's and doc's but havn't found a way to make netatalk make the first zone
and act as the router. Can somebody post or better yet email me a solution
to fix this problem. All I need is a way to make the linux/netatalk server
make the first zone. I have RedHat 5.2 installed and the netatalk 1.42b
rpm installed. Thanks alot, and it helps to email me also, as it is easer
to get intouch! Thanks for all your support guys!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: dual line modems
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 03:27:32 GMT
The SupraSonic II does not implement multilink in
hardware. It's just two modems on one card. The
multilink protocol is implemented in software.
Also, MPPP does not require two IP addresses.
However, some multilinking schemes (like the one
used by the software included with Boca's Duo) do.
As for DSL and cable, they are good choices if you
are fortunate enough to live in an area where they
are available. And here in New Jersey, ISDN is
just too expensive.
Andy (still waiting for DSL or cable to arrive
here...)
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
Date: 14 May 99 01:27:45 -0500
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: pap authentication failure Help..
Reply to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gene Heskett sends Greetings to Bill Unruh;
BU> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Gene Heskett"
BU> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>It appears that having the 'asyncmap 0x000a0000' option set is a
>>basic requirement, at least in the USA. Now it logs in, IF the
>>lines not
BU> No Only for badly coded NT ISPs. Some of them have a bug in which
BU> they appear to negotiate asyncmap, but unless you insist on
BU> oxa0000 they crash.
>>busy, but can somebody tell me why an 8 meg dload takes 3.5 hours?
BU> It sounds to me like you have IRQ problems or that you are
BU> running your modem at the default speed of 9600 bd. If you have
BU> no, or an unsupported speed in your configuration, it will not
BU> tell y ou, it will simply use 9600 BD.
Well. goto network config, dbl-click on ppp0, and wade thru the options
to the interface speed, which is set at 115,200. Very often, a download
will start out at 5000 cps or better, but will quickly degrade to the
sub 1000 cps area, and this is at 2 am local time!
Go figure. Me, I'm screaming for some bandwidth. I'll be damned if
I'll pay an extra 50 bucks a month for a second line if it can't move
any faster than that.
Cheers, Gene
--
Gene Heskett, CET, UHK |Amiga A2k Zeus040 50 megs fast/2 megs chip
Ch. Eng. @ WDTV-5 |A2091,GuruRom,1g Seagate,CDROM,Multiface III
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or |Buddha + 4 gig WDC drive, 525 meg tape
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>|Stylus Pro, EnPrint, Picasso-II, 17" vga
RC5-Moo! 22kkeys/sec isn't much, but it all helps
--
------------------------------
From: Jamie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DNS blues...
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 23:22:19 -0700
Hmm.. Looks like it covers mostly bind 4, I how is it for bind 8? or does that
matter much? seems like bind 8 is more featured new version, it seems to be on
most of my linux distributions, is there a reason i would want to use bind 4
instead? I do like o'reilly books... they are always good.
Jamie
Michael Balderas wrote:
> Go to your local Barnes and Noble and pickup "DNS and Bind, 3rd
> edition" published by O'reilly & Associates. It'll cost you $32.95
> plus tax and it's very informative and pays for itself. You can find
> out more information about the book at:
> http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/dns3/
>
> I have setup 6 Bind 8.0 servers for multiple Intranet/Internet
> pressences with information and configuration help from this book.
>
> Mike
>
> On Fri, 14 May 1999 01:53:09 +0300, "Mies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >Well I'd recommend to read the HOWTO. When I needed to put up DNS systems, I
> >read the HOWTOs, although at first they seemed a bit confusing. The basics
> >are quite easy after all. And look at the bright side, you'll learn when you
> >do it all yourself!
> >
> >
> >Jamie wrote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >>Hi,
> >> Im a bit confused (too much reading...) I want to setup a couple of
> >>nameservers, one master (authoritive), one slave. I need to do this so i
> >>can add virtual hosts. My ISP was willing to help me with one URL, and
> >>that took over a week (after Internic finished with my name...) so... my
> >>ISP sucks, i need to do as much as i can, so i dont have to rely on
> >......
> >
------------------------------
From: Matthew Crema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problems detecting EtherExpress 16
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 00:40:52 -0400
Hi
I'm trying to install RedHat5.2 on a Pentium class system. I am having
problems with the driver for my Intel EtherExpress 16 card. When I run
the installation program it seems to detect the card, but when I boot
linux for the first time it gets hung up just at the point where it
should detect the card.
It seems to be trying to use the driver: eexpress.o
for a card located at IRQ 3 and base address 300.
The IRQ and the address are OK so I think it is the driver.
When I boot the system without detecting the card it boots into linux
just fine.
Also, I am POSITIVE that I set up the network settings correctly.
Has anybody else had this problem with this particular card? Or does
anybody know of a fix?
I'd rather not have to upgrade anything large, since my only other
internet connection is a modem!
Thanks,
Matt
------------------------------
From: "TURBO1010" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.caldera
Subject: Re: IP Masquerading on 2.2
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 22:26:32 -0700
Read the ipchains howto, as masquerading has changed in the newer kernel.
Works great for me, got linux with dual nic's on DSL, masquerading 3 boxes
behind it.
Simple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:AVN_2.2100$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In OL1.3 all you had to do was go into LISA and turn on IP forwarding.
What
> this setting did was set a flag in the /proc directory pertaining to ip
> forwading. In other words OL1.3 came defaulted with ip forwarding support
in
> the kernel. I wonder why they have reversed this feature? Seems like a
step
> backwards and in the wrong direction to me. I have noticed other features
> that have suddenly disappeared also. Why?
>
> Donald E. Stidwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Has anyone managed to get IP Masquerading working on OpenLinux 2.2? I'm
> > having a devil of a time with it. Have had it setup successfully in SuSE
> > 6.0 and RedHat 5.2, but not making any progress in getting it to work
> > with OL 2.2
> >
> > I have recompiled the kernel to use IP forwarding, but when I make
> > modules, none of the ip_masq modules are made.
> >
> > As mentioned, I've had this working perfectly in 2 other distros, but
> > I'm about to tear my hair out on COL 2.2. Any help would be appreciated.
> >
> > Don
>
>
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 00:58:13 -0400
From: Brendan Byrd/SineSwiper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,alt.linux
Subject: Various web server questions...
1. Apache is reporting "HTTP/1.0" for the SERVER_PROTOCOL variable. Is it
actually using HTTP/1.0 or does it fake it for the CGI scripts? How do I change
it?
2. Apache is searching for SSIs on EVERY html file. I only want it to search on
.shtml files or with the exec bit set. (I have the "XBitHack on" directive
also.) How do you fix this?
3. How can you get Apache to su to the user for everything it does? Right now
suEXEC only works for CGIs. This solves a couple of problems, but I really want
to lock down our web servers more by doing stuff like chmod'ing 700 on the
/home/foobar directory. That way, nobody except the user and the web server
(which would su to the user) can see/write/goto the directory and
sub-directories. Any way to fix this? (I've seen it done before.)
4. Any good web usage programs? We've been using analog and wusage, but I'd
like to if there are any better ones out there. Do they provide a good global
log for bandwidth of all of the clients?
5. How do you allow web hosting clients to edit their own e-mail redirector
file? I know OLM.net (and its many resellers) use a .redirect file that looks
like this:
default [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sineswiper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is that an existing system or something of their own? If the latter, is there a
system that I could use?
6. Since nobody really answered it before: What's the difference between using
the RealAudio/Video server to stream files and using HTTP streaming?
And just for reading this far, you get a funny:
http://www.theonion.com/onion3502/very_special_forces.html
--
Brendan Byrd AKA SineSwiper ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Computer techie, PERL master, and all-purpose Internet guru
Resonator Software (http://www.resonatorsoft.com/)
Intent.Net Services (http://www.intent.net/)
-----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
http://www.newsfeeds.com/ The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
=========== Over 72,000 Groups, Plus Dedicated Binaries Servers ==========
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (DB7654321)
Subject: DNS?
Date: 14 May 1999 06:38:34 GMT
I am new to linux and networking and wondered: What are the main uses of a DNS
server? I have a dialup connection to the internet and do not want to handle
DNS requests for the internet. How can I let my ISP handle those? The only
reason I might need one is for the small network (3-5 computers) I am going to
set up soon. What services need DNS?
David Bell
Please don't email me just reply on the board.
------------------------------
From: Jack Donohue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: r-tools only work when I'm logged-on as root
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 21:50:30 -0600
I'm running Slackware 3.5. In my mainframe (AIX) account, I have two
entries in my .rhosts file:
mylinuxboxaddress mylinuxusername
mylinuxboxaddress root
When I am logged-on to my linux box as root, I can rlogin (or rsh, or
rexec) to my AIX account no problem. When I am logged-on to linux as
mylinuxusername, I get:
rlogin -l myAIXusername aixhostname
rcmd: socket: Permission denied
But I can telnet just fine as mylinuxusername. Have I incorrectly
configured my inetd.conf file?
shell stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd in.rshd -L
login stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd in.rshd
Much thanks for any help.
------------------------------
From: mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Best Nework Cards
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 12:51:06 -0400
I would like to know what network cards people have
had the least problems with so that one could have
the best chance of getting one installed and not have to
try to return it and try another?
Mike
------------------------------
From: Alexander Verhaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 2 NIC in same IP segment
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 08:42:41 +0200
In the firewall Howto and other howto's there is one a sample
with 2 different segments (192.168.1.x and the ISP ip number).
If you use 194.109.6.1 for the internet, and you have the same
segment (because of webserver that where there before the firewall)
inside your own network then you have the situation i described below.
Ju wrote:
> Hey I think you should use ipfwadm or something like this.
> Consult Firewall-HOWTO for more information.
>
> Zypher
>
> Alexander Verhaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi, i have configured 2 ethernet cards in one machine.
> > The first network card is for connectivitie to the internet,
> > and the other for our own network. Network card 1 has
> > ip-adress x.x.x.200 and card 2 x.x.x.201.
> > If i ping from the machine to the internal net i get replies, and if i
> > ping to the internet i also get replies. But if i ping from the internet
> > to 1 of the machine behing the firewall it
> > doesn't reply. It looks like Linux isn't forwarding the
> > packets, while it's the same IP segment. Has anyone ever
> > made such a firewall?
> >
------------------------------
From: "David L. Courtney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: samba and Win98
Date: Sat, 01 May 1999 19:43:31 GMT
Arquimedes Dennis wrote:
> Help...
> I recently ungraded my win95 to win98(or loose98) and i can no longer login
>
> ARQ.---
I believe you must enable plain text passwords in the registry. That
fix that Tonina referred to probably does it. The way to manually edit
the registry is posted from time to time. HTH.
DLC
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (brian)
Subject: Help : Very Slow Remote Login
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 03:14:39 GMT
I setup redhat 5.1 on my desktop and use my laptop to connect to it.
when I use telnet to connect, it shows host connected for very long
time before the login prompt appears. but this doesnt happened when i
login locally on the desktop. can someone suggest what may be the
problem? thx in advance.
brian ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
