Linux-Networking Digest #169, Volume #11         Sat, 15 May 99 23:13:30 EDT

Contents:
  ipfwadm + realaudio no-go (Joseph Tweed)
  Re: Can't TELNET to Linux (NOW SAMBA - HELP) (K Berrien)
  Re: Can't TELNET to Linux (FIXED!) Now Samba - Suggestions? (K Berrien)
  Forwarding with multiple ethernet cards (Christian Armeanu)
  Nevermind...weird stuff happening here... ("Matt Mencel" >>)
  Re: SECURITY ISSUES: Single user restriction at lilo boot: (Helmut Kreft)
  hamburger gesucht (Frank)
  Re: NFS server (mountd/nfsd) won't start -- PLS HELP (L J Bayuk)
  Re: mgetty - no dialout (M. Buchenrieder)
  dhcp server installation guide (Marinus Jongmans)
  Re: How to Dialup to Linux Server !? (root)
  Re: 3C509B NIC Problem...try this .... (Vidar Andresen)
  Help bring Uber (cross-platform game networking API) to the masses! ("Dr. Ian 
Ollmann")
  Re: SECURITY ISSUES: Single user restriction at lilo boot: ("Charles Sullivan")
  Re: can't send email through qmail ("Curt")
  Re: NT Logon with Linux username (kazadi)
  Re: Setting up a Linux-box as a Router ("Beastie")
  Re: Taylor uucp scripts (John R. Campbell)
  Re: SECURITY ISSUES: Single user restriction at lilo boot: (Bernd Eckenfels)
  ppp configuration: "serial link is not 8 bit clean" (Dominic Mitchell)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Joseph Tweed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ipfwadm + realaudio no-go
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 00:31:49 +0200

I have SuSE 6.0 running on a machine that is configured as a gateway for
a Win98 client. On this client, I have RealAudio 3.0 running. RealAudio
is set up to use Firewall proxies:
-  for RealAudio proxy: gateway on port 1090
-  for HTTP proxy: gateway on port 3128 (Squid listening there)

Network adapters in the linux machine:
-  ethernet card IP 192.168.0.1  (eth0)
-  ISDN card (dummy) IP 192.168.1.1  (ippp0). My provider assigns an IP
from 194.109.*.*.

On the linux machine I have ipfwadm running (kernel 2.0.36). I disregard
all safety, and install default accept rules for Input, Output, and
Forwarding:
ipfwadm -I/O/F -f     # flush all rules
ipfwadm -I/O/F -p accept     # accept everything

Furthermore:
-  I insmod ip_masq*.o
-  I make sure /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward has a value of 1
-  /proc/net/ip_masquerade exists, so I know the kernel has masquerading
support.

I hope someone out there can explain why, after all of this, I still get
error 19 (Firewall problems) from RealAudio when trying to access
content through the linux machine.



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (K Berrien)
Subject: Re: Can't TELNET to Linux (NOW SAMBA - HELP)
Date: Sat, 15 May 1999 23:48:57 GMT

On Sat, 15 May 1999 21:52:02 +0200, Malware
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Thank you Michael, you've lead me to the answer.  I examined the hosts
file and found I'd incorrectly duplicated the linux boxe's IP as the
same as the remove machine I was telnetting from.  Corrected and
everything is working correctly.

Thanks...

Next challenge, now that FTP, TELNET are working is to get SAMBA
working.  Anyone have suggestions of extra How-To's or documentation
on configuring samba.  I've found the general ones not very helpful
and detailed.

>Hi K,
>
>you wrote:
>> And then it hangs.  I have one other user account created at this
>> time, other than root.
>
>If you wait 4-5 minutes it will probably show a login prompt. To speed
>this up add the host you are accessing this from to /etc/hosts on the
>Linux box.
>
>
>Malware


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (K Berrien)
Subject: Re: Can't TELNET to Linux (FIXED!) Now Samba - Suggestions?
Date: Sat, 15 May 1999 22:40:49 GMT

On Sat, 15 May 1999 21:52:02 +0200, Malware
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Thank you Michael, you've lead me to the answer.  I examined the hosts
file and found I'd incorrectly duplicated the linux boxe's IP as the
same as the remove machine I was telnetting from.  Corrected and
everything is working correctly.

Thanks...

Next challenge, now that FTP, TELNET are working is to get SAMBA
working.  Anyone have suggestions of extra How-To's or documentation
on configuring samba.  I've found the general ones not very helpful
and detailed.

>Hi K,
>
>you wrote:
>> And then it hangs.  I have one other user account created at this
>> time, other than root.
>
>If you wait 4-5 minutes it will probably show a login prompt. To speed
>this up add the host you are accessing this from to /etc/hosts on the
>Linux box.
>
>
>Malware


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Armeanu)
Subject: Forwarding with multiple ethernet cards
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 01:55:04 +0200

Hi,

I have 2 network cards installed in my linux box. She's meant to act as
a server for 2 windoze PCs. My actual problem is the configuration with
ipchains. Until now I couldn't manage to have the windows PCs see each
other, but each of them is able to get to the server (Samba), so
networking is working.
========================

The config is:

(route.conf)
192.168.17.0   0.0.0.0  255.255.255.0  eth0  ( IP: 192.168.17.1 ),
connected PC = 192.168.17.100
192.168.18.0   0.0.0.0  255.255.255.0  eth1  ( IP: 192.168.18.1 ),
connected PC = 192.168.18.100

ipchains -A forward -i eth0 -p tcp -s 192.168.18.0/24 -d 192.168.17.0/24
-j ACCEPT -b
ipchains -A forward -i eth1 -p tcp -s 192.168.17.0/24 -d 192.168.18.0/24
-j ACCEPT -b

============

:-( IT DOES NOT WORK !!!

Any help will be highly appreciated,
Chris


------------------------------

From: "Matt Mencel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<<SPAMBUSTER>>>
Subject: Nevermind...weird stuff happening here...
Date: 13 May 1999 15:51:51 -0500

Nevermind all, it works fine on another PC.  For some reason the laptop that
I was using to test on will not report that information when you type
WINIPCFG.  Like I said...weird.

Matt




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Helmut Kreft)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.security,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: SECURITY ISSUES: Single user restriction at lilo boot:
Date: 16 May 1999 00:31:12 GMT

[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi ,
>
>Comming to the point, How do you block the "linux single" param at boot
>up? what other work arounds can you suggest? Since these are PCs and
>have reset buttons, power cords any user can reboot the machine.

man lilo.conf
look for "restricted"
I think this will solve your problem.

        Helmut

-- 
Un*x IS user friendly. It's just selective about who it's friends are.
                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------

From: Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: hamburger gesucht
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 21:40:45 +0200


hi

ist hier jemand aus dem raum hamburg, der mir bei den isdn einstellungen

von suse 6.1 helfen kann ? ich kann mich nicht bei meinem provider
(hanse-net) einw�hlen.



ich bin echt schon ziemlich verzweifelt.



[EMAIL PROTECTED]



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (L J Bayuk)
Subject: Re: NFS server (mountd/nfsd) won't start -- PLS HELP
Date: 16 May 1999 01:06:17 GMT

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In article <7hfrh0$fek$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (L J Bayuk) writes:
>|> Sorry this doesn't help you. There have been other reports like
>|> yours: nfsd/mountd won't register with portmap (aka rpcbind).
>|> Have you tried running portmap with a debug option and watching
>|> when mountd or nfsd tries to register?
>       
>       I hadn't tried that until you suggested it.  Now I have.
>       Nothing new to report.  :-(

Meaning what? If you run rpc.portmap -d -v, then you start rpc.mountd,
you should see (in the portmap window) a request to delete, then register,
the mountd service. (You can also run mountd in the foreground with debug:
something like rpc.mountd -F -d). If portmap rejects it, you should see
(there or in syslog) the reason.  Did either of these happen?  Also could
you post versions (distribution, kernel, NFS)?

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: mgetty - no dialout
Date: Sat, 15 May 1999 12:21:28 GMT

gpro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

[...]

>Why is the connect script failing? The modem doesn't even
>make any sound when I activate my ppp0 interface from network 
>configuration in x.  To dial out, I have to put in my old inittab
>without mgetty.  What's the problem?
>

Locking.

Read the mgetty info pages again, and update or correct your
pppd and chat versions to be using ttyS0 solely.

Michael
-- 
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
          Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
    Note: If you want me to send you email, don't munge your address.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marinus Jongmans)
Subject: dhcp server installation guide
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 21:56:41 +0200

Hello,

does anybody know where I can find an detailed instruction for setting up an
dhcp server on linux S.U.S.E. 6.1

Marinus Jongmans
(an absolute Linux beginner)
eMail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]





------------------------------

From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: How to Dialup to Linux Server !?
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 15:05:13 -0700

Yes, you can use "mgetty".  

Setting mgetty up to accept dial-ups, do authentication, and then being
able to access all the services (telnet, ppp, mail, etc.) you want
requires configuration, possible mgetty re-compilation, and is not as
easy as one could wish for, however.

Others here may be able to give you better information on setting mgetty
up to do exactly what you want.

Best Wishes,

AT

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vidar Andresen)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: 3C509B NIC Problem...try this ....
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 00:31:46 +0200

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ben Whalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>i have similar cards, 2 x 3c5099b's with pnp switched off, io set to 0x300, irq
>10, with a patch cable connecting the two PCs, cannot get the bloody things to
>work...cards recognised, but i can't get a ping etc from them...gah
>
>any ideas ?

3c509b i guess.

Any conflicts? (sound-card?)

cat /proc/interrupts
cat /proc/ioports

Try to set irq 10 to 'isa only' or 'legacy' or whatever bios on your
machine calls it.

patch cable? crossover or straight cable?  (it needs a crossover if
you dont use a hub/switch)

And if you have pnp switched off, (and the right connector set in the
card, if combo) i guess the 3com (dos-based) configuration util offers
to run tests on the card itself, and connection to other 3com-card
running a sort of echo-server (the configuration util can be set up to
run it).

That way you can check that you have two working card's and a working
connetion between them.

Mvh Vidar Andresen


------------------------------

From: "Dr. Ian Ollmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.mac.programmer.games,comp.games.development.programming.misc
Subject: Help bring Uber (cross-platform game networking API) to the masses!
Date: Sat, 15 May 1999 18:51:53 -0700
Reply-To: OpenPlay List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


//Shameless plug


        Apple has finally released the long awaited Uber cross platform
networking API under its public source license. It is now known as
OpenPlay. This is the same crossplatform networking API used by Bungie in
Myth: the Fallen Lords.

        Currently supported are TCP/IP for Windows and MacOS, and
Appletalk for MacOS. We would like to bring support to a series of other
platforms including Linux, BeOS and various un*x, but we need your help!
We could use a few good programmers help us make sure this is done right
and to help break down the barriers between platforms. Individuals with
strong networking backgrounds in Linux, un*x, Windows*, BeOS, MacOS,
(insert your favorite OS here), and fluency in C and C++ are especially
needed.

Get in on the ground floor of an open source project.

See http://www.publicsource.apple.com/ for a description of OpenPlay.

Interested parties should join the OpenPlay mailing list
([EMAIL PROTECTED]), which is temporily located here:

        http://www.egroups.com/group/openplay-dev/info.html

I hope to see you soon.


                        Ian Ollmann

//end Shameless plug


------------------------------

From: "Charles Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.security,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: SECURITY ISSUES: Single user restriction at lilo boot:
Date: Sat, 15 May 1999 21:45:14 -0400

You'll also have to disconnect any floppy drives, or at least prevent the
PC from being booted from a floppy.   There are DOS programs which
allow ext2 partitions to be read and written under DOS without regard
to the Linux file permissions.

Helmut Kreft wrote in message ...
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Hi ,
>>
>>Comming to the point, How do you block the "linux single" param at boot
>>up? what other work arounds can you suggest? Since these are PCs and
>>have reset buttons, power cords any user can reboot the machine.
>
>man lilo.conf
>look for "restricted"
>I think this will solve your problem.
>
> Helmut
>
>--
>Un*x IS user friendly. It's just selective about who it's friends are.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



------------------------------

Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: can't send email through qmail
Date: Sat, 15 May 1999 20:16:39 -0500

add  MYDOMAIN to /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
and /var/qmail/control/locals
and /var/qmail/control/defaultdomain

Kelvin Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello,
>
> I have a qmail setup in my RH 5.1 system. It is connected to internet
> through cable modem. I have PC clients connected to this server which
> use Netscape as email client. But the PC client cannot send email
> outside the local network. Any email going outside of this local network
> will get the following error message:
>
> The mail server responded:
> sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)
> Please check the message recipients and try again.
>
> And I have execute the qmail-showctl, with the following setting shown:
>
> ============================================================
> [root@MYHOSTNAME qmail-1.03]# qmail-showctl
> qmail home directory: /var/qmail.
> user-ext delimiter: -.
> paternalism (in decimal): 2.
> silent concurrency limit: 120.
> subdirectory split: 23.
> user ids: 80, 81, 82, 0, 83, 84, 85, 86.
> group ids: 80, 81.
>
> badmailfrom: (Default.) Any MAIL FROM is allowed.
>
> bouncefrom: (Default.) Bounce user name is MAILER-DAEMON.
>
> bouncehost: (Default.) Bounce host name is MYHOSTNAME.MYDOMAIN.
>
> concurrencylocal: (Default.) Local concurrency is 10.
>
> concurrencyremote: (Default.) Remote concurrency is 20.
>
> databytes: (Default.) SMTP DATA limit is 0 bytes.
>
> defaultdomain: Default domain name is MYDOMAIN.
>
> defaulthost: (Default.) Default host name is MYHOSTNAME.MYDOMAIN.
>
> doublebouncehost: (Default.) 2B recipient host: MYHOSTNAME.MYDOMAIN.
>
> doublebounceto: (Default.) 2B recipient user: postmaster.
>
> envnoathost: (Default.) Presumed domain name is MYHOSTNAME.MYDOMAIN.
>
> helohost: (Default.) SMTP client HELO host name is MYHOSTNAME.MYDOMAIN.
> idhost: (Default.) Message-ID host name is MYHOSTNAME.MYDOMAIN.
>
> localiphost: (Default.) Local IP address becomes MYHOSTNAME.MYDOMAIN.
>
> locals:
> Messages for localhost are delivered locally.
> Messages for MYHOSTNAME.MYDOMAIN are delivered locally.
>
> me: My name is MYHOSTNAME.MYDOMAIN.
>
> percenthack: (Default.) The percent hack is not allowed.q
>
> plusdomain: Plus domain name is home.com.
>
> qmqpservers: (Default.) No QMQP servers.
>
> queuelifetime: (Default.) Message lifetime in the queue is 604800
> seconds.
>
> rcpthosts:
> SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at localhost.
> SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at MYHOSTNAME.MYDOMAIN.
> SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at k166.MYDOMAIN.
> SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at k166.localdomain.
> SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at pm7300.MYDOMAIN.
> SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at pm7300.localdomain.
> SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at k166.
> SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at pm7300.
> SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at wonderland.dns.org.
>
> morercpthosts: (Default.) No effect.
>
> morercpthosts.cdb: (Default.) No effect.
>
> smtpgreeting: (Default.) SMTP greeting: 220 MYHOSTNAME.MYDOMAIN.
>
> smtproutes: (Default.) No artificial SMTP routes.
>
> timeoutconnect: (Default.) SMTP client connection timeout is 60 seconds.
>
> timeoutremote: (Default.) SMTP client data timeout is 1200 seconds.
>
> timeoutsmtpd: (Default.) SMTP server data timeout is 1200 seconds.
>
> virtualdomains: (Default.) No virtual domains.
> [root@MYHOSTNAME qmail-1.03]#
>
> ===========================================================
>
> Please help... thanks.
>
> Kelvin
>



------------------------------

From: kazadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,linux.rehat.misc,redhat.networking.general
Subject: Re: NT Logon with Linux username
Date: Sat, 15 May 1999 15:59:31 GMT

In article <7glls0$5pn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All....
>
> At the University we have many Windows NT 4.0 Workstation and we would
like
> to make it to validate username and password using Linux RedHat 5.2 as
> account manager, and each time that the user logon in the NT
Workstation, it
> would mount it's home directory stored in the Linux Box. I know that
in order
> to setup this, NFS and NIS is involved, but I couldn't make it....
>
> Does anyone know another way to do this?
>
> Thanks
>
> Ruben Cheng
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Valencia - Venezuela
>
> --
> ========================================================
> Computers are like women... Nobody understand them!
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network
==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your
Own
>

Just use SAMBA, you can configure it to feel and act EXACTLY like an NT
server. You can set up a domain, enable WINS propigate brouse lists,
PLUS everything that you mentioned you needed a Linux box to do above.

Most Linux distributions come with SAMBA these days, so it shouldn't be
difficult for you to set one up. I know for a fact that RedHat 5.2 and
6.0 have it. Slackware 3.2 has it, S.u.S.e 2.2 has it. But just in case
you don't install it with the distro, you can allways download it from
www.samba.org Plus, thats a great place to start looking for
documentation on how to set it all up once you DO have it.

-k-
--
-It told me to "Install Windows 95 or better" So I
installed Linux-


--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---

------------------------------

From: "Beastie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Setting up a Linux-box as a Router
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 17:48:05 -0500
Reply-To: "Beastie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

http://www.linuxrouter.org



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John R. Campbell)
Subject: Re: Taylor uucp scripts
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 15 May 1999 13:30:50 GMT

On Sat, 15 May 1999 08:25:57 GMT, Colin Overton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I would like some sample files required and information to set up
>Taylor uucp under Linux including sys, call, port, etc.

        I use taylor UUCP over IP to reach my e-mail hub (which means
        I avoid having to deal with POP3 or whatnot and each mailbox
        on my local machine becomes a "real" mailbox).

>I have set up uucp under SCO unix and need information do perform it
>quickly under Linux.

        Believe it or not, I've never migrated away from the HDB (BNU,
        HoneyDanBer) configuration files-  they do an adequate job.
        I haven't needed the enhanced functionality of the Taylor-format
        configuration files, so I never allocated the time to perform
        the migration.

        Other than additional protocols, most of your SCO config will
        work just fine.

        One other point-  the location of the files is odd-  look in
        /etc/uucp/oldconfig on RH5.2.  The location may vary (it's off
        somewhere in /var-land on Slackware...).

-- 
 John R. Campbell           Speaker to Machines                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 - As a SysAdmin, yes, I CAN read your e-mail, but I DON'T get that bored!
   Disclaimer:  All opinions expressed are those of John Campbell alone and
                do not reflect the opinions of his employer(s) or lackeys
                thereof.  Anyone who says differently is itching for a fight!


------------------------------

From: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.security,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: SECURITY ISSUES: Single user restriction at lilo boot:
Date: 16 May 1999 02:06:59 GMT

In comp.os.linux.networking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Comming to the point, How do you block the "linux single" param at boot
> up?

Look in the lilo docu for password= and restricted options. But you should
be aware that this does not help u at all. Since it is still possble to plug
a notebook into the net to get to those unprotected nfs home dirs.

> This issue is what prevents us fom deploying linux and new students and
> prospective members of the linux community are at risk.

Well.. other systems arent more secure, are they? You can use samba/smb
filesystem instead of nfs, with this the user needs to give its password to
access the home. This is a bit more secure (og course there can be trojans
to get those passwords). You can add kerberos authentication, that would
help some more. But this, and even NT-user-authentication cant solve the
problem of unprotected hardware. You will need a Single-sign-on system with
smartcards and protected readers.

Greetings
Bernd

------------------------------

Subject: ppp configuration: "serial link is not 8 bit clean"
Reply-To: Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 15 May 1999 22:55:40 -0400

Hi,

I am trying to help two folks who are having problems setting their
internet connection.  I have the last part of the /var/log/messages
( they both have the same kind of messages ).  They have external
modems and can communicate with the modem through minicom.

However according to the logs below, I would be tempted to say that
their kernels does not support ppp according to their logs "serial
link is not 8 bit clean" and "Problem: all had bit 7 set to 0".  Or
could it just be as simple as they are using the wrong device?

Thanks to any good that give a hint on fixing this problem.

By the way does RH ship their kernels with ppp support modularized
or in the kernel.  By experience I know that their kernel support
ppp.  Because I ask them to check if they could find the module on
their system (ppp.o,  plip.o, etc. ) but locate was silent on this. 

Chow,

Dominic.

May 10 20:24:47 localhost pppd[2405]: Serial connection established.
May 10 20:24:57 localhost pppd[2405]: Using interface ppp0
May 10 20:24:57 localhost pppd[2405]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
May 10 20:25:28 localhost pppd[2405]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
May 10 20:25:28 localhost pppd[2405]: Connection terminated.
May 10 20:25:28 localhost pppd[2405]: Receive serial link is not 8-bit clean:
May 10 20:25:28 localhost pppd[2405]: Problem: all had bit 7 set to 0

-- 
==============================================================
Dominic Mitchell           Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Economics    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Queen's University
Kingston, Ontario      
Canada, K7L 3N6            Running Linux Redhat 5.2     
==============================================================

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to