Linux-Networking Digest #193, Volume #11 Tue, 18 May 99 12:13:30 EDT
Contents:
Bind 8 and Dial-on-Demand/IPMASQ ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Internet Connection (Derek Lucas)
Re: eth0 failure! please help ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
MRTG with linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Detecting multiple logins (Apache) (Bart Hartgers)
'Instant Internet' ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: are we getting hacked? (David Goldstein)
Re: samba refuses to broadcast (Elmo Recio)
demand dialing ppp and secure ID prompting. ("Joseph D. Carvalho")
Re: Win95 & Linux ("Ron van Middendorp")
Re: Connecting to internet over LAN ("Kevin Fife")
Re: Can TELNET to Linux box, but then... ("Shawn Pursley")
Re: AS400 tools and connectivity? ("Shawn Pursley")
eth0 broken by Kern 2.2.9 ("Cameron, Gary (EXCHANGE:WDLN2:2Y86)")
Fetchmail (Hans Scheffers)
Re: New cable modem means I have a lot to learn (Lew Pitcher)
Re: samba refuses to broadcast ("Kai Krakow")
Re: Can't telnet to Linux Red Hat 6.0 box. (Derek Lucas)
Re: Long delay starting sendmail ("Ashley Cambrell")
Re: Can TELNET to Linux box, but then... ("Robert Moseley")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bind 8 and Dial-on-Demand/IPMASQ
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 12:44:29 GMT
I am using a Linux box to provide dial-on-demand access
for my home network. I recently upgraded from RH51 to RH6
and have run into a small problem. I am running Bind on
the box so that my Win9X machines won't receive a timeout
while the link is coming up. In order to flush bind's name
cache, I do a restart on bind in the ip-down script. I have
to do the restart because if I ask for a cached name while the
link is down it will reply before the link comes up and the
client machine will be routed into never-never land.
With the old version of bind I just set it up as a forwarding
only nameserver. When I did the restart everthing worked
great. However, with Bind 8, it queries something on the
internet (root name servers?) whenever I do a restart, even
though it is configured as a forwarding only nameserver. This
causes my link to stay up (it gets restarted in ip-down and
brings the link back up).
I have patched it up by deleting all root server entries
in the named.ca file except one, and changing it
to 127.0.0.1. This way it just looks at itself and doesn't
bring the link up. Everything works fine this way, except I
get a good deal of complaining in the syslog.
Any ideas about a better way to do this? I basically need
a forwarding only nameserver that won't try to hit the net
when it is restarted.... or some other way of clearing bind's
cache... which I don't think can be done any other way.
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 09:09:30 -0400
From: Derek Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Internet Connection
Well, first you'll want to setup ther dialer, which in most cases is pppd
and chat. The easiest way to set this up, would be to use linuxconf
(there is PPP setup in the networking section). Then, to setup the DNS,
run a "pico /etc/resolv.conf", and put the following:
domain att.net
nameserver x.x.x.x <- where this is AT&T's primary nameserver.
nameserver x.x.x.x <- where this is AT&T's secondary nameserver.
..then, to setup the mail and news servers, you will need to be in
whatever client you plan on using for mail and news.. whether it be
Netscape in X, pine, tin, slrn.. Netscape should be self-explanatory
(Edit | Preferences , etc), tin is "export NNTPSERVER=<AT&T's news server
here>" (without the < > ), pine is ~/.pinerc , etc.
--
Derek Lucas
Systems Administrator
OneNet Communications, Inc.
513.618.1000 : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 16 May 1999, Andrea Pagliano wrote:
> Hi,
> I just bought the new release of Linux, Red Hat 6.0, and I would like to
> configure the operative system to use my AT&T internet account. What I must
> do?
> I configured the modem using the control panel but now I must configure all
> the server connection. I have the DNS data of my account, the mail and news
> server but I have no idea how to put all these things in Linux.
> Thank you very much for your help!
>
>
> Andrea
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: eth0 failure! please help
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 13:44:09 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just installed Caldera OpenLinux 2.2. I cannot get my 3c509
> networkcard working. It worked in RH5.2. The actual driver loads ok
? how do you know ?
( which message at boot-up)
because normally
when it comes to assign the ip addresses and stuff it says this:
>
> SIOCSIFFLAGS: resource temporarily unavailable
> SIOCADDRT: network is down
> eth0: initialization failed
this seems to tell you that eth0 did NOT load correctly
>
> how do I fix this? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> -Peter
>
>
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MRTG with linux
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 13:18:57 GMT
First off, I'm a linux newbie and a total newbie to SNMP stuff, but
since I do know a little more about Linux then others at my work place,
I got stuck with getting MRTG to work for SNMP stuff. Fun, huh?:)
Anyhow, I believe that I have the settings correctly, but I'm not sure
where to look. When I run the MRTG program I get the following error.
SNMP Error:
no response received
SNMPv1_Session (remote host: "192.168.1.2" [192.168.1.2].161
community: "Public"
request ID: 1693697483
PDU bufsize: 8000 bytes
timeout: 2s
retries: 5
backoff: 1)
SNMPGET Problem for ifInOctets.2 ifOutOctets.2 sysUptime sysName
ifDescr.2 on Pu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SNMPGET: Failed to reach target: "2:[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I tried
multiple times!
Can anyone give me a clue where I should start on diagnosing this?
I know I can ping and even telnet to the router from the linux box, so I
know that I can get there.
Appreciate it if anyone can help me. :)
Jon Hughes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(remove the nospam to email me)
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bart Hartgers)
Subject: Re: Detecting multiple logins (Apache)
Date: 18 May 1999 13:29:59 GMT
Hi Dirk!
Dirk Freese ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Hi,
: does someone know how to figure out if there are several logins on the
: same username?
: I use .htaccess/.htpasswd files on my machine to restrict access on
: certain areas.
Because of the nature of HTTP, the protocol used by Apache, a new connection
will be made for each file requested from the server (this is not entirely
true for HTTP/1.1). Each of these connections will be authenticated (in your
case using the .htaccess/.htpasswd files). After a file has been retrieved,
the connection will be closed again. There is no real login like with telnet
or ftp. (Documentation on this protocol is on http://www.w3.org)
: Assume I have a user "testusr". How can I figure out (and as a
: consequence disable his login) if "testusr" is logged in several times.
: I would like to block such a login in realtime (if possible).
You could check your log files for authenticated connections originating
from different IP-addresses, at (approximately) the same time. This is a
loose criterium, since it is possible for multiple people to use the same IP
(using a multi-user OS, firewalling), or for one person to use more than one
(using a multi-homed host, or proxies).
Blocking logins can only be done by modifying apache.
--
Bart Hartgers -- TUE Eindhoven
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 'Instant Internet'
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 13:38:54 GMT
OK, I've searched the archives, the FAQs, and every Linux web page I can
stand for the last few hours, and I'm probably SOL but it comes
to this...
We are using an MCIS "instant internet" IPX -> IP Gateway in the office,
because all the office PCs run Novell. You know the spec, 20PCs
connecting to this box over IPX, that converts to IP, out down the
leased line and bingo. The WINSOCK seems to handle the redirect locally.
Oh, and the router won't route straight IP, So... How do I get my Linux
box (Redhat 5.1 straight ou of the box, everything installed) to connect
to the internet?
Even if this is not possible, I need to know because NT Workstation is
driving me insane....
Cheers guys,
Craig.
Craig McLean
SG-RS Sun DR Tech.
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: David Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: are we getting hacked?
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 16:11:27 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I logged into our internet gateway and noticed it was running very
> slow. Upon running top I found that in.inetd was consuming a lot of the
> system's cpu. I then ran to /var/log/messages and started reading. I
> noticed a lot of "ftp session closed" and "syn flooding". How can I
> track this down? Also, what does this mean? Following is an excerpt
> from the logfile: (btw, sendmail crashed from a lack of memory
> concerning this. perhaps it is something i misconfigured?)
Under networking options when you compile your kernel, you will see a
reference to SYN cookies. Make sure that you compile the kernel with
this feature on. That should handle the problem. By the way, the help
file associated with this says that the ip address is probably not the
real one, so backtracking probably will not help you here.
> Dustin Puryear
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David
------------------------------
From: Elmo Recio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.samba
Subject: Re: samba refuses to broadcast
Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 11:07:19 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============07C6ED1FDE242A9349D00DB6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Kai Krakow wrote:
> What could have went wrong? Which kernel options do I have to take care of
> to make broadcasting working again?
Maybe this is too elementary... but did you start NMBD?
cheers, elmo
--
Elmo M Recio
Oracle Applications Development
Linux Project Administrator
Office of Info Tech. at
Thomas Jefferson University
201 S. 11th St #305c
Philadelphia, PA 19103
==============07C6ED1FDE242A9349D00DB6
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="erecio.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Elmo Recio
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="erecio.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Recio;Elmo
tel;pager:215-314-2622
tel;cell:215-681-5612
tel;fax:215-503-2OIT
tel;home:215-563-3555
tel;work:215-503-0991
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://polywog.navpoint.com
org:Thomas Jefferson University;Office Of Information Technology
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Software Engineer / Sys Admin
adr;quoted-printable:;;2220 Walnut Street=0D=0AApt 502;Philadelphia;PA;19103;USA
x-mozilla-cpt:;864
fn:Elmo Recio
end:vcard
==============07C6ED1FDE242A9349D00DB6==
------------------------------
From: "Joseph D. Carvalho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: demand dialing ppp and secure ID prompting.
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 15:20:28 GMT
Has anyone had success in scripting a demand dial session, with the session
pausing and calling up a secure id generation script? My provider won't let
me dialin directly, I have to generate a SADB response to their challenge.
Tnx,
--joe
DE KR6NA
------------------------------
From: "Ron van Middendorp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Win95 & Linux
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 16:42:42 +0200
Reply-To: "Ron van Middendorp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yes,
Also Samba
R.
------------------------------
From: "Kevin Fife" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Connecting to internet over LAN
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 11:24:55 -0400
Thanks Mark for the suggestion, however I still am having the same problem.
Netscape gives me an error message like: Host names not resolved
I suppose my DNS search was unsuccessful. What should my resolve.conf say?
kevin
Mark Johnson <markj*no*spam*@gilanet.com> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> At the linux box try:
> route add -net default gw 192.168.10.1
>
> Kevin Fife wrote:
>
> > I have installed Mandrake 5.3 on a 233 mhz computer and I would like to
> > connect to the internet over a corporate LAN.
> >
> > I have TCP/IP installed and working properly. I am able to bring up HTML
> > pages on the local network using the IP address of the computer that is
> > running a web server. However, I cannot get out to the internet.
> >
> > Our lan setup:
> > 192.168.10.1 Gateway and DNS server
> > 192.168.10.29 Address of Linux box
> >
> > What do I need to do to get access to the internet.
> >
> > kevin
>
------------------------------
From: "Shawn Pursley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can TELNET to Linux box, but then...
Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 20:57:35 GMT
Shawn Pursley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:...
> This is what I get when I attempt to TELNET:
>
> Red Hat Linux release 5.1 (Manhattan)
> Kernel 2.0.34 on an i486
> login: root
> Password:
> The system is going down on Mon Nov 16 19:04:36 1998
>
>
> Login incorrect
>
> and then
>
> login:
>
> I attempt to login in as root with the correct password, but get booted
out
> everytime. Anyone got any ideas?
>
BTW - FTP works fine...
------------------------------
From: "Shawn Pursley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: AS400 tools and connectivity?
Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 20:59:42 GMT
IBM is giving away db2 for linux for free - etiher download or request it
via e-mail...
Benedikt Hochstrasser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7gdc58$iq9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Check with IBM - they've recently jumped on the Linux bandwagon.
> There's also some TN5250 emulations around.
> Keep in mind that your AS first has to run on TCP/IP...
>
> Ben
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Tyrrell) wrote:
> > I was wondering if therre were any Linux programs or tools for
> > connectivity with AS400 platforms?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Jim.
>
> Regards, Ben
> (mind the bogus address [EMAIL PROTECTED] <spammers ahoy>; my
real maildomain is
> hotmail.com and my userid there is b_hochstrasser)
>
------------------------------
From: "Cameron, Gary (EXCHANGE:WDLN2:2Y86)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: eth0 broken by Kern 2.2.9
Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 16:53:26 -0400
I upgraded from 2.2.7 to 2.2.9 last night, and am unable to start up the
3c509 ethernet driver on my x86 box. I keep getting startup messages saying
something like modprobe can't find module eth0, even though I am positive my
ethernet was not compiled as a module. I did all the right things like clean
out the previous modules, and doing clean make - I have done this many times
before. I can find eth.o after the build, although it is not in the modules
subdirectory, hence it is not installed to /lib/modules. I did not have this
problem with 2.2.7 or earlier vintage kernels. I was careful in selecting the
right build options when I did make menuconfig - after the networking broke, I
carefully rechecked my build options. Interestingly enough, my dialup PPP seems
to still be working ok.
Has anybody else seen funny ethernet problems with this kernel? If I cannot
resolve the issue tonight, I may submit an offical bug report, and downgrade
back to 2.2.7
--
~~~
/@ @\
===========oOO={ U }=OOo==========================================
\ ^ /
__ _ ___// _ __ _____ __ _ Gary Cameron, P. Eng
| , \| |/ //\| | .\|_ _|/ \| | DSP Software Developer
| |\ | | // | / | | | -- /| |_ Nortel Wireless Networks
|_| \ _|\//__/|_|\_\ |_| \ ___||___| (613)-763-1817 (ESN 6+393-1817)
// Northern Telecom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Hans Scheffers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Fetchmail
Date: 18 May 1999 15:31:00 GMT
Hi,
On my server I use fetchmail to download different e-mail accounts. When I
download from a pop3 server everything works allright, but when I download
from an imap server I have problems when the message contains an
attachment or is a reply. I only receive the header at that moment.
The imap server I connect to is an IMail 4.7 server (MickeySoft)
Does anyone have the same problem or does anyone know how to solve this
problem ?
Thanx,
Hans Scheffers
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lew Pitcher)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: New cable modem means I have a lot to learn
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 15:33:11 GMT
On Tue, 18 May 1999 10:03:07 -0400 (EST), "Steve Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The good news: after years of dithering my cable TV provider is providing
>Internet access. The bad news: I need to quickly get up to speed on
>everything needed to provide Internet access to my whole LAN via the cable
>modem.
>
>My simple LAN consists of a server running RedHat v5.2 (updated to kernel
>v2.2.x and glibc v2.1) and 10 clients (running Win95, Win98 and OS/2) all
>running on the same subnet. Name resolution is done via an identical hosts
>file on each system. The server does not provide Internet access to the
>clients.
>
>I do not intend to run any additional local services (mail, Web, news, etc.)
>at this time. I just want my LANs server to pass packets between the client
>machines and the cable modem.
>
>With the imminent arrival of my cable modem I quickly need info on:
>
>0. My ISP will provide a dynamically-allocated IP address. Does that mean I
>need to configure my server for DHCP? All the client system will continue
>to have static addresses.
Yes, you'll need to configure your server to be a DHCP client of your ISP,
for the IP address of the NIC attached to the cable modem.
>1. Supporting a 2nd NIC in my server. Having Linux recognize both NICs is
>a no-brainer, but how do I configure it to communicate only with the cable
>modem? (The 1st NIC will remain connected to the hub, of course.)
I'm not sure I understand your concern. The 2nd NIC will cable to the cable
modem, either through your hub (maybe not a good idea), or directly by UTP
('null' 10BaseT cable). If you go through your hub, remember that the cable
modem bridges your LAN to a larger LAN consisting of all your neighbours that
are also on cable modems. Ethernet packets originating in your lan might not
be filtered out of the connection, even if you install an IP firewall.
Also, IIRC, the DHCP client expects to talk to eth0, so your 1st NIC
(your LAN) will probably become eth1 (it can remain connected to the hub).
>2. IP Masquerading?
Good Idea. It's not difficult to set up (check out ipchains for Linux 2.2
or ipfwadm for Linux 2.0), and will allow all your LAN workstations access
to the internet without the cost of leasing additional IP addresses from
your ISP.
>3. Firewall? Up to now I haven't had to think much about security, since
>the LAN doesn't have direct Internet access. Now that we'll be constantly
>connected, I'm wondering if I need a firewall. I have an older machine that
>I could use solely as a firewall if needed.
Definitely install a firewall. Remember that when you are connected to the
internet, the internet is connected to you. Even with a simple PPP connection,
*my* firewall has intercepted both IP spoofing attempts (directed at my PPP
IP address), and attempts to log on to my (private) FTP server. Unless you are
prepared to reinstall everything on a compromised system (server *and* perhaps
even your workstations), a firewall is a necessity for a cable-modem or ADSL
connection.
>Any information, or pointers to info, on these topics would be gratefully
>received.
Check out the HOWTO documents (Ethernet, Firewall, IP-Masquerade)
Also search DeJa News for other msgs on ipchains/ipfwadm/etc.
>Thank you.
>
>***** Steve Snyder *****
>
>
>
Lew Pitcher
System Consultant, Integration Solutions Architecture
Toronto Dominion Bank
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(Opinions expressed are my own, not my employer's.)
------------------------------
From: "Kai Krakow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.samba
Subject: Re: samba refuses to broadcast
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 17:30:32 +0200
Reply-To: "Kai Krakow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > What could have went wrong? Which kernel options do I have to take care
of
> > to make broadcasting working again?
>
> Maybe this is too elementary... but did you start NMBD?
This error message is generated by nmbd (ok, it's generated by the kernel
but it's originated in nmbd). It displays in the log.nmb file, and "ps aux"
shows nmbd running...
And it doesn't seem to be related to my firewall because there's no
difference if I enable or disable the firewall. My kernel version is
2.2.5...
And here's what nmbd is logging:
This is how it worked a while ago before I recompiled my kernel and thus
replacing the original one from the distribution (because I needed some ISDN
stuff etc):
[1999/05/11 19:33:41, 1] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(672)
Netbios nameserver version 2.0.3 started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1994-1998
[1999/05/11 19:33:42, 0] nmbd/nmbd_logonnames.c:add_logon_names(159)
add_domain_logon_names:
Attempting to become logon server for workgroup SOL on subnet
192.168.1.105
[1999/05/11 19:33:42, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_browser_bcast(284)
become_domain_master_browser_bcast:
Attempting to become domain master browser on workgroup SOL on subnet
192.168.1.105
[1999/05/11 19:33:42, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_browser_bcast(298)
become_domain_master_browser_bcast: querying subnet 192.168.1.105 for
domain master browser on workgroup SOL
[1999/05/11 19:33:46, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_logonnames.c:become_logon_server_success(118)
become_logon_server_success: Samba is now a logon server for workgroup SOL
on subnet 192.168.1.105
[1999/05/11 19:33:50, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_stage2(118)
*****
Samba server TERRA is now a domain master browser for workgroup SOL on
subnet 192.168.1.105
*****
[1999/05/11 19:34:05, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_become_lmb.c:become_local_master_stage2(406)
*****
Samba name server TERRA is now a local master browser for workgroup SOL on
subnet 192.168.1.105
*****
_________________
Now it looks like this:
[1999/05/18 17:29:12, 1] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(672)
Netbios nameserver version 2.0.3 started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1994-1998
[1999/05/18 17:29:12, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(725)
Packet send failed to 192.168.1.255(137) ERRNO=Operation not permitted
[1999/05/18 17:29:12, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:send_netbios_packet(170)
send_netbios_packet: send_packet() to IP 192.168.1.255 port 137 failed
[1999/05/18 17:29:12, 0] nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name(355)
register_name: Failed to send packet trying to register name TERRA<20>
[1999/05/18 17:29:12, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(725)
Packet send failed to 192.168.1.255(137) ERRNO=Operation not permitted
[1999/05/18 17:29:12, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:send_netbios_packet(170)
send_netbios_packet: send_packet() to IP 192.168.1.255 port 137 failed
[1999/05/18 17:29:12, 0] nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name(355)
register_name: Failed to send packet trying to register name TERRA<03>
[1999/05/18 17:29:12, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(725)
Packet send failed to 192.168.1.255(137) ERRNO=Operation not permitted
[1999/05/18 17:29:12, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:send_netbios_packet(170)
send_netbios_packet: send_packet() to IP 192.168.1.255 port 137 failed
[1999/05/18 17:29:12, 0] nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name(355)
register_name: Failed to send packet trying to register name TERRA<00>
[1999/05/18 17:29:12, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(725)
Packet send failed to 192.168.1.255(137) ERRNO=Operation not permitted
[1999/05/18 17:29:12, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:send_netbios_packet(170)
send_netbios_packet: send_packet() to IP 192.168.1.255 port 137 failed
[1999/05/18 17:29:12, 0] nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name(355)
register_name: Failed to send packet trying to register name SOL<00>
[1999/05/18 17:29:12, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(725)
Packet send failed to 192.168.1.255(137) ERRNO=Operation not permitted
[1999/05/18 17:29:12, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:send_netbios_packet(170)
send_netbios_packet: send_packet() to IP 192.168.1.255 port 137 failed
[1999/05/18 17:29:12, 0] nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name(355)
register_name: Failed to send packet trying to register name SOL<1e>
[1999/05/18 17:29:22, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(725)
Packet send failed to 192.168.1.255(138) ERRNO=Operation not permitted
[1999/05/18 17:29:22, 0] nmbd/nmbd_logonnames.c:add_logon_names(159)
add_domain_logon_names:
Attempting to become logon server for workgroup SOL on subnet
192.168.1.105
[1999/05/18 17:29:22, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(725)
Packet send failed to 192.168.1.255(137) ERRNO=Operation not permitted
[1999/05/18 17:29:22, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:send_netbios_packet(170)
send_netbios_packet: send_packet() to IP 192.168.1.255 port 137 failed
[1999/05/18 17:29:22, 0] nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name(355)
register_name: Failed to send packet trying to register name SOL<1c>
[1999/05/18 17:29:22, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_browser_bcast(284)
become_domain_master_browser_bcast:
Attempting to become domain master browser on workgroup SOL on subnet
192.168.1.105
[1999/05/18 17:29:22, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_browser_bcast(298)
become_domain_master_browser_bcast: querying subnet 192.168.1.105 for
domain master browser on workgroup SOL
[1999/05/18 17:29:22, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(725)
Packet send failed to 192.168.1.255(137) ERRNO=Operation not permitted
[1999/05/18 17:29:22, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:send_netbios_packet(170)
send_netbios_packet: send_packet() to IP 192.168.1.255 port 137 failed
[1999/05/18 17:29:22, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:query_name(232)
query_name: Failed to send packet trying to query name SOL<1b>
[1999/05/18 17:30:22, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(725)
Packet send failed to 192.168.1.255(138) ERRNO=Operation not permitted
___________________
Any suggestion?
ciao
Kai
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 09:12:43 -0400
From: Derek Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can't telnet to Linux Red Hat 6.0 box.
Perhaps the port is not set to the correct telnet port in the client you
are using? The default telnet port is 23.
--
Derek Lucas
Systems Administrator
OneNet Communications, Inc.
513.618.1000 : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 18 May 1999, The Phreique wrote:
>
> I've seen a few telnet questions on here, but mine seems to be a problem
> that no one's seen. This is the problem:
>
> When I try to telnet to my machine I get a connection refused message.
> However when I telnet to work (from home), and then back to my machine
> everything works ok.
>
> I looked in the hosts.allow and deny files.... they're blank (asside from
> some comments).
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> :-)
>
>
> -Sterling W. Lombard (The Phreique)
> http://www.primenet.com/~slombard
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Ashley Cambrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Long delay starting sendmail
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 07:13:59 +1000
You could also just turn DNS off with sendmail, that will do the trick.
Linuxconf R14 + I think has Turn off DNS.
Ashley Cambrell
Villy Kruse wrote in message
<7hoica$24e$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Hugh Fader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> .....
>
>>I am using DMfader.dyns.cx as the name of the mailhost in sendmail.cf.
>>(Dyns.cx provides dynamic DNS to me for free.) Now, if I use the
>>hostname command to set my hostname to roark, I get the delay. If I set
>>it to fader, sendmail starts up quickly. It doesn't seem to matter what
>>I put in /etc/hosts.
>
>No, but if you put in a fully qualified name as an alias in the /etc/hosts
>file it should make a difference:
>
>
>xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx fader fader.dyns.cx
>
>or
>
>xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx roark roark.dyns.cx
>
>
>That is because if the hostname as given is not qualified with a domain
>part sendmail will look up the host name either with DNS or /etc/hosts
>to see if any of the aliases are qualified. If it doesn't succeed with
>/etc/hosts it will try DNS -- for a long time -- before giving up.
>
>>
>> ......
>
>
>
>
>Villy
------------------------------
From: "Robert Moseley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can TELNET to Linux box, but then...
Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 16:07:58 -0500
Shawn Pursley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:mn%%2.3590$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>This is what I get when I attempt to TELNET:
>
>Red Hat Linux release 5.1 (Manhattan)
>Kernel 2.0.34 on an i486
>login: root
>Password:
>The system is going down on Mon Nov 16 19:04:36 1998
>
>
>Login incorrect
>
>and then
>
>login:
>
>I attempt to login in as root with the correct password, but get booted out
>everytime. Anyone got any ideas?
>
>TIA,
>Shawn Pursley
Easy.
There is a file in the /etc directory called securetty. In it are tty
numbers allowed to login as root. When you telnet in, you are assigned a
psedo tty number. If you don't care and want to allow everyone to try to
login as root, just rm /etc/securetty. Not that I would recommed it, but,
to each his own.
Robert Moseley
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
