Linux-Networking Digest #203, Volume #11 Wed, 19 May 99 15:13:45 EDT
Contents:
Re: Problems with PPP and PAP (Gustavo Gonzalez)
Can't telnet to Linux Red Hat 6.0 box (saga continues). (The Phreique)
Re: Where find Samba 2.1 (Derek Lucas)
Re: Can't telnet to Linux Red Hat 6.0 box. (Gregory S. Lyons)
Re: what does this error mean? (Bill Unruh)
Re: "Soundblaster compatible" with Redhat 6? (Brian Wallace)
Re: RedHat Confi. (Jim Roberts)
Re: How to setup Dial on Radhat 5.1 (Howard Mann)
Re: isp's fair use policy (Zeljko Cvrkotic)
Re: Problem with Chat Script (Rand Simberg)
Pop Authentication for Sendmail (Roland Nadeau)
Re: Does Gnome's gdm etc serve X? (Jim Roberts)
Re: HylaFax ("caiw")
Re: POP3 server question ("David Means")
Pop authentication for sendmail (Roland Nadeau)
ftp problem (Simon Gouder)
Re: Small private network woes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Another IP Masquerading problem (Andy Knifel)
Re: chat problems (Vilmos Soti)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Gustavo Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: es.comp.os.linux,linux.redhat.ppp,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Problems with PPP and PAP
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 10:16:51 +0200
CUESTA CUESTA wrote:
> I can't access to internet using PPP properly. I've only been successful
> once, connecting manually, using minicom, exiting without reseting the modem
> and starting pppd with the command:
>
> pppd -d -detach /dev/ttyS1 28800 &
>
> These are the traces for pppd:
> ....
> I'm using RH 5.2 and PPPD 2.3.5.
>
> Thanks
>
> J. C. Cuesta
>
> --
Hi,
First of all do you know this usenet group is "es.comp.os.linux", i.e., to contact in
spanish? So, please in spanish.
Anyway, in respect with your problem I think the best way to connect to internet is
using the kppp application you can find in KDE.
I have use it in a lot of different distributions with success. Try it!
Regards,
--
A. Gustavo Gonzalez
Dept. Anal. Chem., Univ. Seville (Spain)
Phone: (34) 5-4557173 Fax: (34) 5-4557168
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.eumetrics.us.es
------------------------------
From: The Phreique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Can't telnet to Linux Red Hat 6.0 box (saga continues).
Date: 19 May 1999 07:11:48 GMT
Ok, I filled in both the hosts.allow and the hosts.deny files.
My hosts.allow has ALL: LOCAL and my host.deny file has ALL: ALL as the
only line in the files. For some reason my system does not allow any
incomming traffic to my computer (unless I request the data from the
computer).
my inetd.conf has all of the most common network service uncommented, but
still my system doesn't allow ANY connections. (at least it's very
secure)! hehehe.
This is very strange because this box used to let me connect to it, but
now for, no reason, it stopped.
Has anyone seen this?
The Phreique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I've seen a few telnet questions on here, but mine seems to be a problem
: that no one's seen. This is the problem:
: When I try to telnet to my machine I get a connection refused message.
: However when I telnet to work (from home), and then back to my machine
: everything works ok.
: I looked in the hosts.allow and deny files.... they're blank (asside from
: some comments).
: Any suggestions?
: :-)
: -Sterling W. Lombard (The Phreique)
: http://www.primenet.com/~slombard
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 12:17:34 -0400
From: Derek Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Where find Samba 2.1
If you run RedHat, you can find RPM installs of Samba-2.1, both source and
binaries.
Check out ftp://ftp.lame.org/mirrors/redhat
--
Derek Lucas
Systems Administrator
OneNet Communications, Inc.
513.618.1000 : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 18 May 1999, Bruno Breyton wrote:
> Please, I need to download Samba 2.1. Where I could get it?
> : ) merci Ciao kaya
>
>
>
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 12:12:42 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory S. Lyons)
Subject: Re: Can't telnet to Linux Red Hat 6.0 box.
On Tue, 18 May 1999 09:12:43 -0400, Derek Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Perhaps the port is not set to the correct telnet port in the client you
> are using? The default telnet port is 23.
> Derek Lucas
> Systems Administrator
> OneNet Communications, Inc.
> 513.618.1000 : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 18 May 1999, The Phreique wrote:
>
> I've seen a few telnet questions on here, but mine seems to be a problem
> that no one's seen. This is the problem:
>
> When I try to telnet to my machine I get a connection refused message.
> However when I telnet to work (from home), and then back to my machine
> everything works ok.
>
> I looked in the hosts.allow and deny files.... they're blank (asside from
> some comments).
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> :-)
>
>
> -Sterling W. Lombard (The Phreique)
> http://www.primenet.com/~slombard
>
>
>
I was having a similar problem with my setup. I was unable to 'telnet
localhost' or telnet in from an NT box on my lan. My hosts.allow and
hosts.deny files were blank (except for comments).
After playing with this for quite awile, I discovered that i didn't
have a man page for hosts.allow... ...oops, tcp_wrappers was not
installed. I installed the tcp_wrappers RPM and bang! functional
telnet
Greg
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Unruh)
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.ppp
Subject: Re: what does this error mean?
Date: 19 May 1999 16:43:13 GMT
In <7hu7qt$t7r$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Steven Unruh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>i'm getting the following:
>May 18 13:29:39 thanos pppd[11886]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyp0
>May 18 13:29:43 thanos modprobe: can't locate module ppp-compress-21
>May 18 13:29:43 thanos modprobe: can't locate module ppp-compress-26
>May 18 13:29:43 thanos modprobe: can't locate module ppp-compress-24
>May 18 13:30:13 thanos pppd[11886]: IPCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
>May 18 13:30:13 thanos pppd[11886]: Connection terminated.
Two separate problems ( the first not crucial)
Put the lines
alias ppp-compress-21 bsd_comp
alias ppp-compress-24 ppp_deflate # From original RFC draft
alias ppp-compress-26 ppp_deflate # Final standard per ppp-2.3.4
into /etc/conf.modules
for the first set of errors.
The second means that the far side made no response to your requests to
do ppp. Switch on debug for pppd
(put
debug
into your /etc/ppp/options file
and put
daemon.* /var/log/messages
into /etc/syslog.conf)
Then issue
killall -1 syslogd
The page
axion.physics.ubc.ca/ppp-linux.html
gives step by step instructions for getting ppp to work ( an figuring
out why it does not if it does not)
>does anybody know what it means and how do i fix it so it works?
>steve
>--
>He who laughs last thinks slowest!
------------------------------
From: Brian Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: "Soundblaster compatible" with Redhat 6?
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 12:53:12 -0400
Geoff Roach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This seems to more than a common problem. It has come up a few times in
the
> last few days in comp.os.linux.networking. I have the same problem. It
> seems that the SB cards, especially the SB 16 cards, blow away the
> definitions for the networking cards - NE2000 and 3com cards seem to
suffer
> the most.
> Nobody has come up with a solution that I can see.
OK, the 'problem' your talking about it likely Plug and Play (PnP). The
Sound card takes the addresses the network card had or wants. This is
common and did happen to me, I fought with it till I was able to fix it.
You can use isapnp to setup the cards and force the SB16 to it's normal
defaults of PORT 0x220, DMA 1 & 5, and IRQ 5; OPL3 0x388, MPU 0x330.
It's the MPU that seems to default to 0x300 and take the network card's
place. This problem exists in all versions of linux and Win95, Win98...
as it's really a Plug and Play problem (I had to fix it in both linux
and Win98 for my AWE64).
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Roberts)
Subject: Re: RedHat Confi.
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 17:35:38 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Yitong Phou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have tried to config RH 6.0 my machines many times but it alwasy something
> that causes the package not to work right. For example, sound card, network
> card, and internet interface with PPP. MS windows is more friendly which I
> don't have any problems but it is not stable. I have gone thru to read
> documentations several times but no lucks. I have re-installed it several
> times but it is not working.
>
> Here are my problems:
> PPP is working but the netscape is not seeing the PPP.
> Used KPPP, the modem is connected to my ISP, but the netscape cannot see it
> either.
> I have config my soundcard awe64 the same way the ms-windows (IO, IRQ, DMA
> ETC...) and it is fails.
>
> Is there any one can help me to overcome these problems ( I have dealed to
> these for 2 years now to make Linux to work on my machine).
>
> --
> Yitong Phou
>
>
If you want to E-mail me I will try to help. But as a starter, it sounds
like PPP isn't setting a default route. After starting PPP run either;
'route -n' or 'netstat -nr' and give us the results. This way we can
see if routing is correct. Also give us the output of 'ifconfig' so
we can see if the interface is set up.
I believe the sound card is a PNP device. You may want to take a look
at pnptools and do a little reading on this one before giving up.
--
Jim Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Never enough time!
------------------------------
From: Howard Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to setup Dial on Radhat 5.1
Date: 19 May 1999 03:27:11 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Witman Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi All,
>
> I download the 0.16 version of Diald any try to install it on Readhat 5.1.
> But it cannot compile sucessfully. Can anyone point me how to modified it
> and config it? Thanks in advance.
>
> BR,
> Witman Peng
>
I suggest a RPM package : http://rufus.w3.org/linux/RPM/DByName.html
Then, http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue41/nielsen2.html
and http://home.altoplanos.net/~raanders/diald.html
Cheers,
--
Howard Mann
http://www.newbielinux.com
(a LINUX website for newbies)
Smart Linuxers search at: http://www.deja.com/home_ps.shtml
------------------------------
From: Zeljko Cvrkotic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: isp's fair use policy
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 10:39:16 +0200
ben wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to be able to access my linux box at home over the
> internet. The problem is that my ISP has a "fair use" policy, so they
> don't like it when I leave my computer dialed in all day. Has anyone
> setup or know how to setup my linux box so I can call the line that the
> modem is connected to via a voice line, have it ring but not answer,
> then wait until the line is free and dial my ISP? Or can anyone think
> of a better solution?
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated. I don't think my ISP likes me
> being logged in for over 20 hours a day.
>
I have an idea but not sure about realization. Try to setup mgetty with
callback. You will log to your computer, than disconnect and than your
PC will call ISP. I hope this will help. Maybe someone have different
solution.
--
====================================================================
Zeljko Cvrkotic Linux Users Group of Yugoslavia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.linux.org.yu
====================================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rand Simberg)
Subject: Re: Problem with Chat Script
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 17:18:40 GMT
On 19 May 1999 06:35:14 GMT, in a place far, far away,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Unruh) made the phosphor on my monitor glow
in such a way as to indicate that:
>]> pppd /dev/ttyS2 115200 debug connect "/usr/sbin/chat -v ''
>]> ATD13108960011 CONNECT '' ogin:
>]> us,ppp,simberg assword: *********"
>
>Are you sure it is on the same command line.
Well, you were sorta right. It was breaking the line in the middle of
the script, so it thought it was at the end. I rebroke it right after
the "connect" and then it took everything. To wit:
pppd /dev/ttyS2 115200 debug connect \
"/usr/sbin/chat -v -t 30 '' ATD13108960011 CONNECT '' ogin:
us,ppp,simberg assword: AdAstra8"
And I got this session...
May 19 09:54:41 localhost pppd[1305]: pppd 2.3.7 started by root, uid
0
May 19 09:54:42 localhost chat[1306]: send (ATD13108960011^M)
May 19 09:54:43 localhost chat[1306]: expect (CONNECT)
May 19 09:55:11 localhost chat[1306]: ATD13108960011^M
May 19 09:55:11 localhost chat[1306]: CONNECT
May 19 09:55:11 localhost chat[1306]: -- got it
May 19 09:55:11 localhost chat[1306]: send (^M)
May 19 09:55:11 localhost chat[1306]: expect (ogin:)
May 19 09:55:21 localhost chat[1306]: 115200^M
May 19 09:55:21 localhost chat[1306]: netcom login:
May 19 09:55:21 localhost chat[1306]: -- got it
May 19 09:55:21 localhost chat[1306]: send (us,ppp,simberg^M)
May 19 09:55:22 localhost chat[1306]: expect (assword:)
May 19 09:55:31 localhost chat[1306]: ^M
May 19 09:55:41 localhost chat[1306]: netcom login: us,ppp,simberg^M
May 19 09:55:51 localhost chat[1306]: Password:
May 19 09:55:51 localhost chat[1306]: -- got it
May 19 09:55:51 localhost chat[1306]: send (**************^M)
May 19 09:55:52 localhost pppd[1305]: Serial connection established.
May 19 09:56:01 localhost pppd[1305]: Using interface ppp0
May 19 09:56:01 localhost pppd[1305]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS2
May 19 09:56:02 localhost pppd[1305]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1
<asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x74b8197d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 19 09:56:30 localhost last message repeated 9 times
May 19 09:56:33 localhost pppd[1305]: LCP: timeout sending
Config-Requests
May 19 09:56:33 localhost pppd[1305]: Connection terminated.
May 19 09:56:33 localhost pppd[1305]: Connect time 0.6 minutes.
May 19 09:56:33 localhost pppd[1305]: Receive serial link is not 8-bit
clean:
May 19 09:56:33 localhost pppd[1305]: Problem: all had bit 7 set to 0
May 19 09:56:41 localhost pppd[1305]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
May 19 09:56:41 localhost pppd[1305]: ioctl(TIOCSETD, N_TTY):
Interrupted system call
May 19 09:56:42 localhost pppd[1305]: Exit.
It's obviously looking for something more than just my user name and
password. According to the Unruh web page (I assume that's
yours?--nice job), it's looking for something like ' ""ppp' at the end
of the chat string. Does that mean that the line should now look like
this?
pppd /dev/ttyS2 115200 debug connect \
"/usr/sbin/chat -v -t 30 '' ATD13108960011 CONNECT '' ogin:
us,ppp,simberg assword: AdAstra8 ""ppp"
When I run that (or with ""pppd"), I get the following:
May 19 09:45:15 localhost pppd[1291]: pppd 2.3.7 started by root, uid
0
May 19 09:45:16 localhost chat[1292]: send (ATD13108960011^M)
May 19 09:45:16 localhost chat[1292]: expect (CONNECT)
May 19 09:45:45 localhost chat[1292]: ATD13108960011^M
May 19 09:45:45 localhost chat[1292]: CONNECT
May 19 09:45:45 localhost chat[1292]: -- got it
May 19 09:45:45 localhost chat[1292]: send (^M)
May 19 09:45:45 localhost chat[1292]: expect (ogin:)
May 19 09:45:55 localhost chat[1292]: 115200^M
May 19 09:45:55 localhost chat[1292]: netcom login:
May 19 09:45:55 localhost chat[1292]: -- got it
May 19 09:45:55 localhost chat[1292]: send (us,ppp,simberg^M)
May 19 09:45:55 localhost chat[1292]: expect (assword:)
May 19 09:46:05 localhost chat[1292]: ^M
May 19 09:46:15 localhost chat[1292]: netcom login: us,ppp,simberg^M
May 19 09:46:25 localhost chat[1292]: Password:
May 19 09:46:25 localhost chat[1292]: -- got it
May 19 09:46:25 localhost chat[1292]: send (*********^M)
May 19 09:46:25 localhost chat[1292]: expect (ppp)
May 19 09:46:45 localhost chat[1292]: ^M
May 19 09:46:55 localhost pppd[1291]: Connect script failed
May 19 09:46:55 localhost chat[1292]: alarm
May 19 09:46:55 localhost chat[1292]: Failed
May 19 09:46:56 localhost pppd[1291]: Exit.
So what am I doing wrong? I couldn't tell from going through the
entrails of the first attempt, just what Netcom wanted.
************************************************************************
simberg.interglobal.org * 310 372-7963 (CA) 307 739-1296 (Jackson Hole)
interglobal space lines * 307 733-1391 (Fax) http://www.interglobal.org
"Extraordinary launch vehicles require extraordinary markets..."
Replace first . with @ and throw out the "@trash." to email me.
Here's my email address for autospammers: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Roland Nadeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.comp.linux.xxx,alt.comp.linux.isp,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.security,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x,computer42.mail2news.linux-alert,comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Pop Authentication for Sendmail
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 13:13:35 -0400
Hey All,
I hope someone can help, I have a mail server running RedHat 5.2
here's the problem. Sendmail will not
allow someone on an unknown net relay, there has to be an enty for
thier net in the /etc/mail/relay_allow file.
ISP's like AOL have to many nets and I would have to allow all of
thier nets for my users to send an email.
This is a problem for possable spam relaying. Can someone point me to
a fix to use POP to authenticate or
any other possable fix.
--
Thanks.....Roland
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Roberts)
Subject: Re: Does Gnome's gdm etc serve X?
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 17:22:54 GMT
In article <7hst96$frk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Vicente) writes:
> If so how does one serve X on Redhat 6.0?
>
My guess is that Redhat still uses XFree86 as the
X server. Gnome would be a client application.
--
Jim Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Never enough time!
------------------------------
From: "caiw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HylaFax
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 07:05:25 +0200
Hi,
Try to check your modem chip and look into /var/spool/fax/config
There are a lot of config files available for each modemchip type.
If you find it check against /var/spool/fax/etc/fax.modem (if you use
/dev/modem)
We had a lot of problems when using the wrong config for the modem
We had problems getting a complete fax send a had a lot of
transmittion errors until we changed the config.modem
Hans
Michael Schuster heeft geschreven in bericht
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi everybody
>
>Wer hat Erfahrung mit Hylafax. Gibt es irgendwelche Probleme mit einem
>ELSA 28.8TQV ... es mag einfach nicht.
>
>Sollte jemand eine lauff�hige config haben ... dan bitte melden.
>
>Besten Dank
>
>Wartend Micha
>
------------------------------
From: "David Means" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: POP3 server question
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 22:44:53 -0700
Teri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Dumb question, but I have Linux running on two machines, both
> Debian 2.0.34 using smail (sendmail). On one machine I installed
> mail from the setup packages, on the other I forgot to install
> mail, and installed it later. On the first machine, when I
> connect to get mail from a windows machine, everything works fine.
> On the second machine (the one I installed mail manually), windows
> complains that it can't find the POP3 server. I can't find what it
> is I'm missing to get it to be a POP3 server. Please help!
Have you checked to make sure that POP3 is enabled in
/etc/inetd.conf. If you didn't install mail services from a package,
the relevant lines might be commented out:
pop-2 stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd ipop2d
pop-3 stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd ipop3d
------------------------------
From: Roland Nadeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.networking,alt.linux.slakware,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.security,comp.os.linux.setup,computer42.mail2news.linux-alert,thenet.support.linux,comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Pop authentication for sendmail
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 15:14:30 -0400
==============B66037D8529E36FE5834668F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hey All,
I hope someone can help, I have a mail server running RedHat 5.2
here's the problem. Sendmail will not allow someone on an unknown net
relay, there has to be an enty for thier net in the
/etc/mail/relay_allow file. ISP's like AOL have to many nets and I would
have to allow all of thier nets for my users to send an email. This is a
problem for possable spam relaying. Can someone point me to a fix to use
POP to authenticate or any other possable fix.
--
Thanks.....Roland
==============B66037D8529E36FE5834668F
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Hey All,
<p> I hope someone can help, I have a mail server running
RedHat 5.2 here's the problem. Sendmail will not allow someone on an unknown
net relay, there has to be an enty for thier net in the /etc/mail/relay_allow
file. ISP's like AOL have to many nets and I would have to allow all of
thier nets for my users to send an email. This is a problem for possable
spam relaying. Can someone point me to a fix to use POP to authenticate
or any other possable fix.
<pre>--
Thanks.....Roland
</pre>
</html>
==============B66037D8529E36FE5834668F==
------------------------------
From: Simon Gouder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ftp problem
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 18:44:48 +0200
Hi,
I have a small network consisting of 2 Windows 98 machines and 1 Red Hat
Linux machine (5.1).
My problem is that I cannot use the ftp service between the Windows
machine and the Linux box.
However I can ping to and from all machines and can also telnet fron the
W98 machines to the Linux.
The /etc/services file is all right as specified int the HOW TOs
literature.
Can somebody help me,
Simon
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Small private network woes
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 13:15:20 -0500
Also make sure that you can ping the other machines first -- if you cannot, even
with the numbers ('ping 192.168.1.1'), then the basic network or the ip is not
working -- fix that first.
Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, James R. Barnett, Jr.
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says...
> > Hi,
> > I am trying to setup a network in my home consisting of two linux
> > boxes and a hub. So far it looks something like this:
> >
> > 192.168.1.1 arson.toughguys.org arson
> > 192.168.1.2 tireiron.toughguys.org tireiron
> >
> > Both machines can ping each themselves but not each other (I have tried with
> > names and IPs). When I run ifconfig, it lists the Bcast: 192.168.1.255. There
> > is no machine at this IP address. What should the Bcast be in my situation and
> > how is it changed? Do I need to add any gateways using the route command? Any
> > and all help is appreciated.
> >
> > James
> >
>
> #arson:
> #ipaddr 192.168.1.1
> #netmsk 255.255.255.0
> #netwrk 192.168.1.0
> #brdcst 192.168.1.255
> #gatewy nil
> ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
> route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
>
> #tireiron:
> #ipaddr 192.168.1.2
> #netmsk 255.255.255.0
> #netwrk 192.168.1.0
> #brdcst 192.168.1.255
> #gatewy nil
> ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
> route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
>
> Ensure that the kernel likes your ethernet card: use "dmesg" after
> startup.
>
> Ensure that your "ifconfig" command is doing the right thing.
>
> Ensure that your routing table is correct.
>
> If you don't know what you're looking for, post the results of these
> commands run on both machines to this newsgroup.
>
> ifconfig
> route -n
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Luca
> --
> Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: Andy Knifel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Another IP Masquerading problem
Date: 19 May 1999 18:30:59 GMT
Michael J Porter wrote:
>
> Do you have forwaring enabled? You have to have it compiled into
> the kernel, and you have to write a one to something like
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4_forwarding (don't have the exact file name
> here.) I think there is a shell variable you can set in
> /etc/sysconfig/network:
>
> NETWORKING=yes
> FORWARD_IPV4=true
> ....
>
>
Hi Mike,
I have all the above turned on in my RedHat 5.9 setup. I can browse the
net and retrieve E-Mail. but when I try to access my intranet. I get
access denied on 192.168.1.2 and .3.
I primarily use my Linux box as a router and server to the net. I am
reading the apropriate howto's. But they are a little confusing.
BTW, I have ipchains 1.3.8 setup. When I started learning linux. IPFwAdm
got swith to IPChains.
thanks
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 14:49:02 +0000
From: Vilmos Soti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: chat problems
Chuck Winters wrote:
>
> I am trying to set up a PPP connection to my ISP. I went through the
> How-To's to try and figure it out. I finally got the modem to dial up
> the provider, then you hear the static, beeping, etc. Then it just
> sits idle. I checked my messages log file and this is what it said
>
> :
> localhost chat[1816]: CONNECT
> localhost chat[1816]: -- got it
> localhost chat[1816]: send (^M)
> localhost chat[1816]: expect (ogin:)
> localhost chat[1816]: 14400 V42 ^M
> localhost chat[1816]: ^M
>
> Then I quit. Just in case, 14400 is the speed of my modem. I am
> stumped. Please help!!
> Thanks.
Hi,
Did you connect to your provider through minicom or seyon? In order to
figure out what exactly you have to provide? BTW your problem seems to
be a different breed. It seems that you send the newline character too
fast after the connection goes online. You might need to wait for a
second or two. It is in somewhere in the HOWTOs. Try
expect CONNECT
send "\d\d"
expect ogin
...
Good luck, Vilmos
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
