Linux-Networking Digest #257, Volume #11 Sun, 23 May 99 20:13:59 EDT
Contents:
NIC will not be found (Carsten Huettl)
Well got further with it. ("Matt Goebel")
Re: UDP Masquerading (Carles Arjona)
@home and 10Base-T--anyone using this combo with linux? (Walter Tautz)
Re: STAROFFICE INSTALL (Hartmann Schaffer)
Re: Mail Gateway (Carles Arjona)
Re: Where to Find the IP address of a Machine (Carles Arjona)
Re: DSL questions (Stephen Carville)
Redhat 6.0, IP Masq, and Samba HELP!!!!!! ("Matt Goebel")
DNS server problems (Karl Sarnow)
Works now IP MASQ and Samba needs to work????? ("Matt Goebel")
Re: 3com network problem- stumped (Walt Bowers)
MODEM SPEED (Pascal Blondiau)
Ethernet Link ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Kernel 2.2.x: PPP freezes (Clifford Kite)
Re: Apache Logs ("Ian")
Re: SMC EZcard 10 Support ("pg")
My Modem Cablemodem has got a Hangup. Might just be the pppd... ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
remote root telnet in RedHat 6.0 ("Jim Orfanakos")
ipfwadm to nt problem ("Ron Baakkonen")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Carsten Huettl)
Subject: NIC will not be found
Date: 23 May 1999 21:57:27 GMT
Hallo,
I have a problem installing a NIC under Red Hat Linux v5.1 and v5.2
My Configuration:
PC 486/66, 16MB, VL-Bus
NIC: Enet VL-32, running for over an year under Red Hat Linux v4.2.
Red Hat Linux v4.2 foungd the NIC and set it up properly.
The display while the machine comes up:
eth0: PCnet32 at 0x300, 00 80 48 d8 0f 29, probed IRQ 10, no DMA
needed.
Lance32.c:v0.10 28.4.96 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now I tryed to update the system to Red Hat Linux v5.1 bzw. v5.2 but
every time happens the same: The NIC wil not be found automatically.
Is there somewhere a bootparameter I can check or configure?
In the setup there is a point to give in optional Boot parameters. But
I don't know the right syntax
Can anyone help me setting up the NIC properly?
TIA
C:
--
Carsten Huettl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Matt Goebel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.dcom.modems.cable,linux.redhat.announce,linux.redhat.digest,linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.list,linux.redhat.misc,linux.redhat.rpm,linux.samba
Subject: Well got further with it.
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 04:05:17 -0400
Reply-To: "Matt Goebel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I pulled the NIC card from my Windows 98 machine that was connected to the
Internet and put it into my Linux Box and reloaded 6.0. The card was auto
detected and the install went well. When I booted up for the first time I
was able to ping IP numbers but not urls, Netscape didn't work either. I'll
use the pump update tomorrow and try again. At least I'm one step ahead of
where I was. Now here is another problem(s): even though I was able to get
one NIC to work I'm not getting my others too. I had planned on connecting
the cable modem to a older 10 base card (Linksys Etherlink Combo Card II)
since the cable modem doesn't even go that fast and save the 10/100 cards
for connection to my hub for internet access via IP Masq and for file
sharing. Linux seems to accept the 10 base card (a NE2000 PCI clone) but
doesn't auto detect it. Linux won't let me use the card I was going to use
for connecting to the hub (ever though it is a slightly different version of
the same card I've hooked the cable modem up to.) So I'm going to use the
two cards I managed to get working in the linux box and put the others in my
Windows machine since they are not as picky. Getting the two cards to work
together maybe a problem. Now for the static ip card do I need to enter a
domain name and etc for it to work on my LAN? Or do I just need the IP
(192.168.0.1 in this case)??
------------------------------
From: Carles Arjona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: UDP Masquerading
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 00:23:42 +0200
Justin Grochoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have IP Masquerading set up on my linux box and my internal machines can
> interact via numerous ip protocols (HTTP, FTP, ...) but UDP packets do not
> seem to be masqueraded. I could not find a module to load to perform this
> function either.
You need some modules to add masquerading support for some applications:
/sbin/modprobe -l ip_masq*
> I am running RH5.2 (kernel 2.0.36).
> Can anyone point me to a way to masquerade all UDP packets or generically
> all ip packets?
http://www.xos.nl/linux/ipfwadm/paper/node6.html
PS.: You might read also my previous message "Re: Did RedHat 5.2 config
include ip-masquerate?" at comp.os.linux.networking.
Regards.
Carles Arjona [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Please, just remove the second NOSPAM for replies from newsgroups.
(Yes, NOSPAM is my real username)
[Don't send me e-mail copies of usenet postings, please]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Walter Tautz)
Subject: @home and 10Base-T--anyone using this combo with linux?
Date: 23 May 1999 21:40:02 GMT
I was wondering if people could indicate the NIC
they are using with rogers@home (canada) under linux
and what version of the kernel they're using. A rating
of how well the card works would be appreciated.
===============================================
Walter Tautz
Department of Combinatorics & Optimization
Faculty of Mathematics
University of Waterloo
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hartmann Schaffer)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: STAROFFICE INSTALL
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 21:05:50 GMT
[Posted and mailed]
In article <_lM13.13085$me.6037441@wrenphoon4>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anthony DiChiacchio) writes:
> I'M TRYING TO INSTALL STAROFFICE 3.1 - WHEN I TRY TO RUN THE SETUP PROGRAM I
> GET ERROR "CAN'T LOAD LIBRARY 'LIBXM.SO.2'. I'M NEW TO LINUX AND
> COULD USE SOME HELP. THANKS.
First of all, Staroffice is now at 5.1, so you have a pretty old version
and it might be advantageous to download the latest (easier to install
as well). libxm.so.2 is an old version of the Motif library, and so
depends on it. You might be able to use lesstif.
Hartmann Schaffer
------------------------------
From: Carles Arjona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Mail Gateway
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 00:08:32 +0200
Marcio Lima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am trying to setup a linux box as a gateway between my local network and
> the ISP.
<snip>
> The PPP stuff is already working. Now, I suppose I need to configure
> sendmail,
http://personal1.iddeo.es/ret005lc/diald-win-e.html#sendmail
less $(locate cf/README)
http://www.sendmail.org
news:comp.mail.sendmail
> fetchmail, etc.
man fetchmail
http://www.tuxedo.org/%7Eesr/fetchmail/fetchmail-FAQ.html
> Can anybody help me ?
You might receive more specific replies if you post more specific
questions.
Regards.
Carles Arjona [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Please, just remove the second NOSPAM for replies from newsgroups.
(Yes, NOSPAM is my real username)
[Don't send me e-mail copies of usenet postings, please]
------------------------------
From: Carles Arjona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Where to Find the IP address of a Machine
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 23:32:28 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I have redhat 5.2 running on my machine with two NICs, having two
> different IP address. If give ifconfig -a command, it shows both the IP
> address.
> Now, Pls. can anybody tell me where it stores this IP address .?
At the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ directory.
> Will it store in an simple text file..? in which file it stores..?
1) Install the rgrep-0.98.4-6.i386.rpm package from RedHat 5.2.
2) Assuming that some of the IP addresses is 192.168.X.X , then you
might look for the involved files with:
rgrep 192.168 /etc/*
Regards.
Carles Arjona [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Please, just remove the second NOSPAM for replies from newsgroups.
(Yes, NOSPAM is my real username)
[Don't send me e-mail copies of usenet postings, please]
------------------------------
From: Stephen Carville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DSL questions
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 15:13:39 -0700
Chris wrote:
>
> On Sat, 08 May 1999 14:03:03 GMT, bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> in comp.os.linux.networking:
>
> >: > first dsl customer and guinea pig. i'm paying 200.00 a month for the
> >: > service and 12.00 a month for leasing the modem. at 768k up and down,
> >: > thats amazingly cheap. thats half of a t1 at less than 1/5 of the
>
> >: Wow! 200/month! I'm 2x that spped on my cable modem at 40/month!
>
> >but cable modems (the topology) can die quickly when there's lots of
> >shared use. its like one huge collision domain (sort of). whereas
> >adsl is more like a switched network. more users on the net don't
> >-have- to take the whole thing down.
>
> That's still a high price. I'm paying $53 (Canadian, tax included) per
> month for ADSL, with no modem surcharge. The $100 installation fee was
> even refunded after I had been on-line for a year. The company only
> guarantees 1Mb speed, but I'm close enough to the switch to get 2.6Mb.
I am not convinced that DSL is really such a good deal. Bryan's rate is
just about right for the US market. I pay about $95 per month for 368K in
both directions and this is one of the cheaper rates available.
The argument that DSL versus cable modem is like switched versus shared is
less than convincing. The CSMACD algorithm means that when you have the
bandwidth it is all yours and that no one can hog it. The inherently
bursty nature of computer traffic means that loads need to reach 40% to 70%
of available bandwidth (depending on the media) before there is any
noticeable degradation in performance. Even if DSL was intrinsically
faster, few carriers offer a decent CIR on the bandwidth your are paying
for. My carrier (GTE) only give a 32 Kbps CIR on all DSL services (even if
you pay for the 768/1.544 plan) and do not offer the full 768K/3.2M bps
they claim to cabbala of.
I am beginning to suspect that, for most people, cable modem is a better
choice than DSL. Either is better than ISDN :-)
--
Stephen Carville
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
====================================================
It's all right to have geniuses build systems for use by idiots, but
the path from laboratory to marketplace needs to go through the
proving ground of prudent engineering.
Peter Coffee
------------------------------
From: "Matt Goebel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.list,linux.redhat.misc,linux.redhat.rpm,linux.samba
Subject: Redhat 6.0, IP Masq, and Samba HELP!!!!!!
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 18:10:05 -0400
Reply-To: "Matt Goebel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ok, I just got my Linux box connected to the net via my cable modem. I've
also got a 2nd NIC card in my machine up and running. I assigned the 2nd
NIC a static IP (192.168.0.1) and nothing else no domain name etc.. I'm
able to ping both ways between it and my other machines (Win98 with IP's of
192.168.0.X) Now I want to setup the Linux box to provide internet access
to the other machines (IP MASQ) and share files (Samba.) What is the
easiest way to do this? (I'd prefer to use the Gnome GUI over command line
junk) I realize I'll need to alter the smb.conf file for Samba. I'm a
little confused as to what values need to be changed so that I can see my
linux box under 98's control panel??? As for IP Masq'n where do I even
start, I need lots of help on that. My Kernel shouldn't need to be
recompiled for it since it is build 2.2.5. How do I enable it and set it up
to handle this???
------------------------------
From: Karl Sarnow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DNS server problems
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 22:55:39 +0200
Hello,
I tried to setup a DNS server according to the literature. It seems the
server does not work:
bash-2.02# nslookup
*** Can't find server name for address 192.168.0.2: Non-existent
host/domain
Default Server: koeln.shuttle.de
Address: 194.95.247.252
My configuration:
192.168.0.2 is the Nameserver, which is connected to the internet via an
ISDN-line. 194.95.247.252 is the external DNS.
In the configuration files I find adrresses like "adamix.paradix." and
I translated that to the FQD with a trailing dot,
"dadoka.h.ni.schule.de." in my case.
May be this is wrong?
Any help welcome. Hints how and where I can get more information about
the status of my installation are most welcome.
Thanks
Karl
--
Dr. Karl Sarnow
Teacher at Gymnasium Isernhagen
German national co-ordinator of the European Schools Project
e-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Attention: New URL: http://www.shuttle.schule.de/h/dadoka
------------------------------
From: "Matt Goebel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.announce,linux.redhat.digest,linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.list,linux.redhat.misc,linux.redhat.rpm,linux.samba
Subject: Works now IP MASQ and Samba needs to work?????
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 17:52:48 -0400
Reply-To: "Matt Goebel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks guys for all the info. I got my cable modem working now. All I need
was to call Mediaone and have them change the MAC to that of the card in my
Linux box, set it to use DHCP, and install the pump patch. Works great now.
I've also got my 2nd network card in the Linux box to work. Now I need help
getting my other machines (Windows 98) to use it as a gateway to the
internet via IP Masq. Since I'm using Redhat 6 (kernel 2.2.5) I think
support for this is built in and I won't need to recompile the kernel?? I
also need to get Samba to work. At the moment all I can go with the 2nd NIC
is ping the other machines and vice versa.
Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:eRW13.14267$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > The version of pump supplied with 6.0 does not work with roadrunner. At
> > least I have found this to be so. The updated version does work. You can
> > either get the updated version of pump or edit '/etc/resolv.conf'. I bet
> > if you look at /etc/resolv.conf you won't see your nameservers, only the
> > word search. Hope this helps.
>
> I used RH6 to do a complete install and during initialisation I set it to
> configure dhcp for RoadRunner. It worked first time and all I needed
> to add was a default gateway route to the routing table. Use linux-conf
> for this.
>
> Nick
>
>
------------------------------
From: Walt Bowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3com network problem- stumped
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 18:32:03 -0400
"Cameron, Gary (EXCHANGE:WDLN2:2Y86)" wrote:
> Chlump Iacocca wrote:
>
> > This is a most interesting problem.
> >
> > I was running RedHat 5.2 (2.0.36) with a 3com 3c595 ISA (Vortex) card. it
> > is on the companies local Intranet using DHCP. The NT side works great.
> > <snip>
> >
> > Anybody have a clue what could be going on?
>
> I am using SuSE 6.0 with 2.2.9, and am having problems with my 3c509 card.
> The ethernet card would not initialize on startup, and when I recompiled it as a
> module and load it manual I get a message like: "init_module() device or
> resource busy" ifconfig shows nothing is there. My PPP connection works
> normally. I could downgrade back to 2.2.7 but that is a brain dead thing to do,
> and I would really like to try and find what happened. I haven't been able to
> solve it yet. Maybe over the (long) weekend...
>
> --
I have two 3Com 3c509 cards with RedHat 5.2 The system recogizes both cards just
fine; however, I cannot ping anything on either LAN. If I remove one of the cards
everything works fine. Has anyone seen anything like this?
------------------------------
From: Pascal Blondiau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: MODEM SPEED
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 23:39:55 +0200
I'AM USING SUSE LINUX 6.1 AND I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW HOW
I CAN FIX THE SPEED OF MY MODEM (OLITEC 56000 SELFMEMORY
UPDATE TO V90) TO A SPEED OF 49 KBPS TO CONNECT TO MY
ISP AND THAT MY MODEM REFUSE ANY CONTACT WHICH IS SLOWER
THAN 49 KBPS. ACUTALLY I'AM USING KPPP TO CONNECT TO MY
INTERNET PROVIDER SO IF THERE EXITS ANY POSIBILITY WITH
KPPP OR AN OTHER PROGRAMM PLEASE INFORM ME. (THE EXPLANATION
HAS TO BE FOR BEGINNERS SO A LITTLE BIT MORE DESCRIPTION
AS USUAL) THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP.
PASCAL
P.S.: THE TOP SPEED OF MY PROVIDER SEEMS TO BE 49900 BPS AND
I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY THE CONNECTIONS IS 49 KBPS AND
AND ALL THE OHTER TIME 33.6 KBPS AND THIS ALTERNATES
AT ANY TIME OF THE DAY SO I SUPOSE THAT THE RELATION
IF THERE ARE MANY OR FEW PEOPLE NO IS THE PROBLEM.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ethernet Link
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 21:30:39 GMT
I have tarzan running Redhat5.2 with a network card. I have yeye
running windows95 with a network card. I have twisted pair wire
connected tarzan to yeye. I am not getting a link. Where do I go from
here? I use yeye as my ham radio. I use tarzan as my ppp dialer.
Best Regards,
JJ
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.2.x: PPP freezes
Date: 23 May 1999 16:45:10 -0500
Kris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: A chatscript works with kernel 2.0.36...
: >I've assumed that you used essentially the same scripts in 2.0.36 and so
: >have the defaultroute option in place. The same with resolv.conf. And
: >you're confident that the IRQ configured for the modem's device file
: >is correct?
: Yup, defaultroute's there. And resolv.conf is there, and set up with my
: nameservers. My IRQs are also correct - I can talk to my modem fine with
: minicom, and since everything works with 2.0.36 that won't be the
: problem. The IRQ autodetect selects the things which I tell it to use
: anyway, so I haven't barfed with the serial port settings.
: Could this be a kernel or ppd bug? I know of one other person on the
: debian-user mailing list who might have the same problem.
I really don't think it's a kernel or pppd bug - as I remarked before
I'm using 2.2.9 and ppp-2.3.8 with no problem.
It "smells" like a transparency problem because of the large number
of PPP negotiation exchanges with very slow progress plus restarts.
The asyncmap, the device file configuration, or, maybe, the internal
modem AT profile.
It's difficult to know how to suggest this without seeming to be, well,
single-minded, but you really ought to check the IRQ. A simple definitive
test is to add the expect/send '' ATZ followed by OK '\c' at the
start of the chat script. The time difference between the time that ATZ
is sent and the time that OK is received should be no more than 2 seconds
*maximum*, and is usually less than 1 second. A misconfigured IRQ will
result in a time difference on the order of 19 seconds. The check to
be done while using the 2.2.9 kernel and ppp-2.3.8 of course.
I've run dry of suggestions at this point but wish you luck in solving
the problem. If there's some way I can help further just let me know.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* 97.3% of all statistics are made up. */
------------------------------
From: "Ian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: japan.www.server.apache,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Apache Logs
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 10:46:35 +1200
There are many ways to do this.
Two that spring to mind are:
1) check out the man pages for logrotate.
2) write a cron to copy the log file off and then do a "cp /dev/null
access_log".
#! /bin/bash
LOGFILE="log file name with full path"
BACKUP="full filename of where you want to put the copy"
#if you want a date extention to the copy file name
# BACKUP=${BACKUP}.`date '+%d%m%C%y'`
cp $LOGFILE $BACKUP
cp /dev/null $LOGFILE
# end of example
Anybody else got any other methods?
Ian
Benjamin John wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>How can the apacher server log files get rotated automatically
>?(monthly) i know it can be done with cron jobs, but have no idea how..
>
>is there any other way to do this ?
>
------------------------------
Reply-To: "pg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "pg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SMC EZcard 10 Support
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 13:14:16 GMT
Time Warner News <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:27I13.144$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I need to know what module to use with SMC EZcard 10 Ethernet PCI Card.
>
> I am attempting to used 2 cards.
> I already have another older SMC card (ISA) . . . that uses the wd module.
> The newer SMC card will not work with the wd module.
>
> What module works for my newer SMC card?
>
> I am currently using Red Hat 5.2.
>
> Thank,
> Jay
>
============================================================================
=================================================
Jay,
The SMC Ether EZ10/100 uses the realtek driver - it's the rtl8139. The
driver that shipped with Redhat 5.2 did not work (for me at least) - so you
might want to try finding the latest driver on the web.
Becker's site has some good info on this card.
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/rtl8139.html
You may even be able to find a precompiled version that works
somewhere.....good luck !
( I never got mine working.....instead went with 3com and Linksys....)
pg
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: My Modem Cablemodem has got a Hangup. Might just be the pppd...
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 22:22:16 GMT
I am running Slackware. To be precise:
Linux meforce 2.0.35 #57 Tue Oct 13 23:02:53 CDT 1998 i686 unknown
Problem: What's the Hangup with my pppd daemon dameon? Help.
What I gather is the HW works perfectly but I'm setting the wrong "I
don't have a clue whatevers!". The pppd daemon dies suddenly. It dies
damn good too. I'm tired of its deathly ;-) demonstration. Help.
I've tried many permutations of my userid/password combinations. All
valid I might ;-) add. Valid in the sense that the properly formatted
combinations somehow "exist" because it's paid for. That kind of
valid. The Format of whether I am supposed to use "expressnet" or
"ex-pressnet" or "Nothing At All" in userid combination has caused
considerable mindless frustration.
Therefore, I also haven't actually elimated the possiblity that my
typing is so misinputed by These Tired User's Hands...
Still, I reckon it's not due to bad typing at the userid/password
typing level that is the source of my pppd daemon troubles. What else
could it be? The 3com 3c900B modem seems to be recognized fine for
here is the dmesg line at startup
53:eth0: 3Com 3c900 at 0xf880, 00:10:5a:a4:0a:f1, IRQ 11
and the module 3c59x is uploaded via the /etc/rc.d/* files.
Per the excellent instructions, needing minor grammatical corrections,
given on
http://metalab.unc.edu/linux/HOWTO/mini/Cable-Modem-4.html#ss4.3
here's my consequent ifconfig output:
meforce:~# ifconfig
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
RX packets:484 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:484 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
Collisions:0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:5A:A4:0A:F1
inet addr:10.0.0.1 Bcast:10.0.0.15 Mask:255.255.255.240
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:4894 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
Collisions:0
Interrupt:11 Base address:0xf880
ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
inet addr:153.35.88.44 P-t-P:206.115.156.4 Mask:255.255.0.0
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING MTU:1524 Metric:1
RX packets:24 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:21 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
Collisions:0
Memory:2ba6038-2ba6c34
My last /var/log/ppp contents follow:
May 23 15:18:42 meforce pppd[629]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: timeout set to 3 seconds
May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: abort on (\nBUSY\r)
May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: abort on (\nNO ANSWER\r)
May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: abort on (\nRINGING\r\n\r\nRINGING\r)
May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: send (rAT^M)
May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: expect (OK)
May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: rAT^M^M
May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: OK -- got it
May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: send (ATH0^M)
May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: timeout set to 30 seconds
May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: expect (OK)
May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: ^M
May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: ATH0^M^M
May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: OK -- got it
May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: send (ATDT1301#######^M)
May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: expect (CONNECT)
May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: ^M
May 23 15:19:03 meforce chat[630]: ATDT1301#######^M^M
May 23 15:19:03 meforce chat[630]: CONNECT -- got it
May 23 15:19:03 meforce chat[630]: send (^M)
May 23 15:19:03 meforce chat[630]: expect (Username:)
May 23 15:19:03 meforce chat[630]: 57600^M
May 23 15:19:03 meforce chat[630]: ^M
May 23 15:19:03 meforce chat[630]: ^M
May 23 15:19:03 meforce chat[630]: User Access Verification^M
May 23 15:19:03 meforce chat[630]: ^M
May 23 15:19:03 meforce chat[630]: Username: -- got it
May 23 15:19:03 meforce chat[630]: send (YourUsernameGoesHere^M)
May 23 15:19:04 meforce chat[630]: expect (Password:)
May 23 15:19:04 meforce chat[630]: YourUsernameGoesHere^M
May 23 15:19:04 meforce chat[630]: Password: -- got it
May 23 15:19:04 meforce chat[630]: send (YourUserPasswordGoesHere^M)
May 23 15:19:04 meforce pppd[629]: Serial connection established.
May 23 15:19:05 meforce pppd[629]: Using interface ppp0
May 23 15:19:05 meforce pppd[629]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/cua1
May 23 15:19:05 meforce pppd[629]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap
0x0> <magic 0x49957748> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 23 15:19:11 meforce last message repeated 2 times
May 23 15:19:11 meforce pppd[629]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x8a <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x61c24812> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 23 15:19:11 meforce pppd[629]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x8a <auth pap>]
May 23 15:19:11 meforce pppd[629]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap
0x0> <magic 0x49957748> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 23 15:19:11 meforce pppd[629]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x8b <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x61c24812> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 23 15:19:11 meforce pppd[629]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x8b <auth chap
05>]
May 23 15:19:11 meforce pppd[629]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x8c <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x61c24812> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 23 15:19:11 meforce pppd[629]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x8c <auth pap>]
May 23 15:19:11 meforce pppd[629]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x8d <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x61c24812> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 23 15:19:11 meforce pppd[629]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x8d <auth chap
05>]
May 23 15:19:12 meforce pppd[629]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x8e <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x61c24812> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 23 15:19:12 meforce pppd[629]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x8e <auth pap>]
May 23 15:19:12 meforce pppd[629]: rcvd [LCP TermReq id=0x8f]
May 23 15:19:12 meforce pppd[629]: sent [LCP TermAck id=0x8f]
May 23 15:19:12 meforce pppd[629]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x90 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x61c24812> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 23 15:19:12 meforce pppd[629]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x90 <auth chap
05>]
May 23 15:19:12 meforce pppd[629]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
May 23 15:19:12 meforce pppd[629]: Modem hangup
May 23 15:19:12 meforce pppd[629]: Connection terminatEd.
May 23 15:19:13 meforce pppd[629]: Exit.
Have I explained my dilemma clearly and specifically enough? TIA for all
feedback.
The Modem Cablemodem combo works perfectly fine under my Win95 OS.
This and other tests verify that my HW is operational.
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Jim Orfanakos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Jim Orfanakos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: remote root telnet in RedHat 6.0
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 22:57:59 GMT
I used to have RedHat 5.1...I modified /etc/securetty and
/etc/security/access.conf to allow all network ports and all users to login.
I just installed RedHat 6.0, modified the same files but I still cannot
telnet in as root (other users can telnet it).
Any Ideas?
--
------------------------------------------------------
Jim, Monika and Sophia Orfanakos
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.orfanakos.com
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
From: "Ron Baakkonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ipfwadm to nt problem
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 16:24:07 -0700
I am having intermittent problems when using an NT client behind a linux box
running ipfwadm.
Ordinarily, everything works fine. I can very happily communicate through
the firewall and masquerade IP packets all day long. However, for unknown
reasons, my NT machine is sometimes unable to ping the far-side of my
firewall - some sort of timeout occurs and the ping is unsuccessful. When I
reboot the NT machine, all is fine.
I would appreciate any hint anyone might have as to how I can track down
what is going on. Does anyone know of any diagnostic software for an NT
client hitting ipfwadm?
My set up is (for those who are curious):
NT Client (192.168.0.2) ----> Linux eth0 (192.168.0.1) ----> Linux eth1
(201.155.77.53) ----> cable modem service ISP
>From 192.168.0.2 I can always ping 192.168.0.1, but not always reach
201.155.77.53, which is on the same machine as 192.168.0.1
All help appreicated.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
