Linux-Networking Digest #249, Volume #11 Sun, 23 May 99 01:13:40 EDT
Contents:
SAMBA Success Story - repost ("W.A. Scheer")
Virus scanning mail server for BSD or Linux ("Tom Jobbins")
Re: Samba Help ("Ron van Middendorp")
How to create *.o files ("Vincent Van Thorre")
Re: ipchains on RH 5.2 ?? (Chip Transisto)
Re: sendmail (DonJr)
Re: APM ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
"ip rule list" causes RTNETLINK error: Invalid argument ("Jakub Dadak")
Re: PPP headaches ([email protected])
Re: PPP with MSCHAP - hint (Richard Birchall)
Re: DSL questions (Chris)
Re: NAT or Masquerading with 2 subnets... (Chris)
Re: SAMBA Success Story - repost ("Rinaldi J. Montessi")
Re: Firewall for linux (Zenon Fortuna)
Re: Samba Server not in Network Neighborhood ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Subnet Confusion (Paul Michael Tevis)
Re: Samba ARRRGGGHHH! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Sendmail relay question (Gaetan Paquette)
Re: PPP & Netscape don't see each other (Brandon)
Re: Modem hanging up. (Gilford Wimbley)
Anonymous ftp on Linux? (Ramon F Herrera)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 18:44:44 -0700
From: "W.A. Scheer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SAMBA Success Story - repost
I've noticed a lot of "Can't Get SAMBA to work" posts in this group. I'm
reposting the following in hopes that it may help SAMBA newbies like
myself:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Well, I'm not really sure why things weren't working in the first place
but
here's what I did to get things working:
1) UNINSTALLED Samba from my RedHat Linux 6.0 'workstation' using RPM.
2) REINSTALLED Samba ... using RPM.
3) CHECKED my /etc/inetd.conf file to be certain that this line existed:
swat stream tcp nowait.400 root
/usr/sbin/swat
swat
This enables using the 'SWAT' (Samba Web Admin Tool) to configure
SAMBA.
4) OPENED SWAT in Netscape Navigator by going to:
http://192.168.0.5:901
Note that '192.168.0.5' is the IP address of my machine. The
':901'
part tells Navigator to talk to port #901
5) CONFIGURED my 'Global' settings as follows (make sure to 'commit
changes'):
workgroup = MYGROUP
netbios name = LINUX
security = user
encrypt passwords = yes
6) Created a directory called /export/share1. You can do this either
the
GNOME File Manager tool or
with the mkdir command.
7) USED the 'Shares' section in SWAT to create a new share called
'share1'
and configured it as follows
(remember to 'commit changes'):
path = /export/share1
read only = no
guest ok = no
browseable = yes
available = yes
8) I then went to the 'Status' page of SWAT and started the smbd and
nmbd
services.
Magically, my new 'share1' now works, and I can access it from my Win98
workstation!!! Sorry for a long post, but I wanted to be as helpful as
possible to others in this 'group having problems with SAMBA as well.
W.A. Scheer
------------------------------
From: "Tom Jobbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.admin,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Virus scanning mail server for BSD or Linux
Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 12:37:03 +0100
Hi,
I'm running a small ISP, currently using entirely FreeBSD 3.1 servers. We
use Sendmail 8.9.2 for mail.
We would like to add the facility for virus checking of all email that goes
in and out of our servers. I've looked into this and found several
SMTP-based products for Windows NT, and a couple for Solaris, but I can't
find any that would run on my current FreeBSD servers. The nearest I've
found is a product for SCO - which I believe FreeBSD can emulate - however I
dont know if this emulation would be good enough for a production server.
I'd be very surprised if there were any products that support FreeBSD
natively, but of course I can run BSDi and Linux binaries fairly easily
through emulation (and I have succesfully used binaries like this on
production servers without problems; the emulation seems excellent).
If needs be, I could even install a stand alone Linux server, e.g. if
there's a product that works under Linux but wont run (well) under
emulation. But I really dont want to have to install a NT server for this
(I'd love to install a Sparc server running Solaris.. but couldnt justify
the cost yet)
If anyone knows of any products or solutions that would work, then I would
be most appreciative.
Thanks,
Tom
------------------------------
From: "Ron van Middendorp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba Help
Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 13:40:52 +0200
Reply-To: "Ron van Middendorp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www.samba.org
R.
------------------------------
From: "Vincent Van Thorre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How to create *.o files
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 16:21:11 +0200
Hallo,
During the startup of LRP I get the message: /lib/modules/8390.o (ne.o)
error reading ELF header: succes.
Sow I suppose I didn't create my 8390.o and ne.o file like it should be.
Can anybody give me information about this problem?
Thanks in advance.
Vincent
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chip Transisto)
Subject: Re: ipchains on RH 5.2 ??
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 02:45:12 GMT
Reply-To: Chip Transisto
On Sun, 23 May 1999 00:59:25 +0200, "Eriksson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>After trying IP masq on Slackware (2.0.36) I bought a new computer and
>installed Red Hat 5.2 (2.2.4) cause I couldn't get the PPP connection going
>with slackware..
>
>I read the IPCHAINS-HOWTO and tried to get the damn thing to work but
>noooo...
>
>My questions:
>
>a) WHERE should I write the ipchains configuration commands?
put them in the /etc/rc.d/rc.local file
>
>b) WHAT configuration commands should I write??
/sbin/ipchains -P forward DENY
/sbin/ipchains -A forward -s 192.168.0.0/24 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -j MASQ
assuming your network is 192.168. etc.
>
>Thanx a mill!
>
>/Martin
>
>P.S How do you add new users on Red Hat 5.2 without having to edit
>/etc/passwd directly?
>
------------------------------
From: DonJr <donjr@[127.0.0.1]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: sendmail
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 22:27:32 -0400
Most likely all you have to do if the imap package is install
rmp -qa | grep imap
Will tell you if it install. Else it's on the CD
Is add the following in /etc
# cd /etc
# ln -s ../usr/sbin/imapd rimapd
Nick wrote:
>
> Do I have to download the imap package, or is it already on the machine?
> --Nick
>
> Ian wrote:
>
> > You need a pop3 server (in the imap package), and to add the approptiate
> > entry to your /etc/inetd.conf. That's all there is to it.
> >
> > I think there is a commented out entry in /etc/inetd.conf which will do the
> > job unless you use a different pop3 server.
> >
> > I use ids-ipop3d, which works well, though the ipop3d from the imap package
> > also seems ok.
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > Nick wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > >I have a linux box running RedHat 6.0. How do I set up Sendmail to
> > >become a POP3 server. I have heard about how it is supposed to work,
> > >but every time I try to connect, I get an error message. I am trying to
> > >connect with the Netscape Communicator mail service.
> > >
> > >--Nick
> > >
--
-----------------------
Don E. Groves, Jr.
my Email is jetnick AT erols DOT com
I'll add a witty saying here later.
================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: APM
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 22:32:01 -0400
Benjamin John wrote:
> Dont think your error has nothing to do with PPP
>
> it mentions APM
> two different things.
> read the ppp how to, or if ur on a Redhat system, go to
> X -> control-panel -> network configuration.
> pretty easy graffical tool to setup ppp
Yes, it was very easy...the only problem was that it didn't work. I have been
reading HOWTO's and docs for months.
------------------------------
From: "Jakub Dadak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: "ip rule list" causes RTNETLINK error: Invalid argument
Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 13:57:40 +0200
Hi,
I have problem with followed message when i'm trying to configure
routing rules.
"ip rule list" command causes RTNETLINK error: Invalid argument
Where is a problem ?
Rehat 6.0 - default kernel 2.2.5-15
iproute2-ss990417
Thanks JD
PS: Please reply to my email
--
,{(~)~(}, Dadak Jakub Brain Systems s.r.o.
,( ((~) ){){} dadman at brainsys.cz Rybkova 1
())~{)}{{}~()} http://www.brainsys.cz Brno 602 00
`~^ ^~{()} Tel. +420 5 41148704 Fax. +420 5 41148852
~~ Motto: Things are different !
------------------------------
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: PPP headaches
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 22:53:39 -0400
I just love this place; "something" is causing your problem, thus your problem.
Indeed...oh, and don't forget to read the docs and HOWTO'S.
> The logs also indicate that you have something set up to run pppd at 30
> second intervals in some cases. This causes overlapping of pppd runs
> and thus the tcgetattr error.
------------------------------
From: Richard Birchall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP with MSCHAP - hint
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 03:31:10 GMT
In article <7i6v0i$da4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (bill davidsen) wrote:
> After spending half an hour trying to determine why a system was
> offering pap to a RAS server and ignoring the chap80 (aka m$chap), I
> discovered that there was a typo in the 'remotename' clause of the
> startup script.
>
> You *must* use a remotename option with chap80, it works much better
if
> you make it match the entry in the chap-secrets file. What you see if
> your ppp offering the <auth pap> over and over. Hopefully this will
help
> someone else who can't type perfectly.
Here are the settings I use...
/etc/ppp/chap-secrets:
NTDOMAIN\\username * password
/etc/ppp/options:
name 'NTDOMAIN\\username'
remotename *
Richard
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris)
Subject: Re: DSL questions
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 03:20:09 GMT
On Sat, 08 May 1999 14:03:03 GMT, bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
in comp.os.linux.networking:
>: > first dsl customer and guinea pig. i'm paying 200.00 a month for the
>: > service and 12.00 a month for leasing the modem. at 768k up and down,
>: > thats amazingly cheap. thats half of a t1 at less than 1/5 of the
>: Wow! 200/month! I'm 2x that spped on my cable modem at 40/month!
>but cable modems (the topology) can die quickly when there's lots of
>shared use. its like one huge collision domain (sort of). whereas
>adsl is more like a switched network. more users on the net don't
>-have- to take the whole thing down.
That's still a high price. I'm paying $53 (Canadian, tax included) per
month for ADSL, with no modem surcharge. The $100 installation fee was
even refunded after I had been on-line for a year. The company only
guarantees 1Mb speed, but I'm close enough to the switch to get 2.6Mb.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris)
Subject: Re: NAT or Masquerading with 2 subnets...
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 03:45:44 GMT
On Sun, 9 May 1999 12:44:28 -0700, "Robert Novitskey"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in comp.os.linux.networking:
>I am using the 169.254.*.* private IP's on our internal machines.
You should not be using those addresses on a machine that connects to the
internet unless you are the authorized holder of those addresses. The
networking addresses reserved for private networks are:
10.x.x.x netmask 255.0.0.0 (Class A network)
172.16-31.x.x netmask 255.255.0.0 (32 Class B networks)
192.168.x.x netmask 255.255.255.0 (65536 class C networks)
> I would
>like to set up the Ethernet interfaces as follows:
>
>-eth0 (DSL), ISP uses DHCP, so config info is dynamic
>-eth1, my office, IP=169.254.0.1, netmask=255.255.128.0
Use 192.168.1.1 on the linux server, 192.168.1.2 on your office PC.
>-eth2, phoneline, IP=169.254.129.1, netmask=255.255.128.0
Use 192.168.2.1 on the linux server, 192.168.2.2 on her office PC.
>I would like the internet machine to have a DHCP server, so I can set up my
>internal machines to just pull config info from that machine. As well, I
>need a DNS server that just forwards requests to my ISP's DNS. As well, I'd
>like to run SAMBA, so I can put some file shares on this machine.
Those are all possible. You will simply need to follow the appropriate
HOWTO documents. HOWTO documents are available from a bunch of www sites,
and are also included on most Linux release CDs. They are installed to
the /usr/doc/HOWTO directory by default.
The only "gotcha" you may face is finding a set of DHCP clients and
servers that will work properly with each other in a multi-interface
machine. The newer versions (some still beta) will allow you to specify
which interface(s) to use, but the older established packages tend to
watch all interfaces, which can result in your DHCP client talking
directly to your DHCP server, ignoring the ISP.
------------------------------
From: "Rinaldi J. Montessi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SAMBA Success Story - repost
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 23:51:50 -0400
"W.A. Scheer" opined
> I've noticed a lot of "Can't Get SAMBA to work" posts in this group. I'm
> reposting the following in hopes that it may help SAMBA newbies like
> myself:
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Well, I'm not really sure why things weren't working in the first place
> but
> here's what I did to get things working:
>
> 1) UNINSTALLED Samba from my RedHat Linux 6.0 'workstation' using RPM.
>
> 2) REINSTALLED Samba ... using RPM.
>
> 3) CHECKED my /etc/inetd.conf file to be certain that this line existed:
>
> swat stream tcp nowait.400 root
> /usr/sbin/swat
> swat
>
> This enables using the 'SWAT' (Samba Web Admin Tool) to configure
> SAMBA.
>
> 4) OPENED SWAT in Netscape Navigator by going to:
>
> http://192.168.0.5:901
>
> Note that '192.168.0.5' is the IP address of my machine. The
> ':901'
> part tells Navigator to talk to port #901
>
> 5) CONFIGURED my 'Global' settings as follows (make sure to 'commit
> changes'):
>
> workgroup = MYGROUP
> netbios name = LINUX
> security = user
> encrypt passwords = yes
>
> 6) Created a directory called /export/share1. You can do this either
> the
> GNOME File Manager tool or
> with the mkdir command.
>
> 7) USED the 'Shares' section in SWAT to create a new share called
> 'share1'
> and configured it as follows
> (remember to 'commit changes'):
>
> path = /export/share1
> read only = no
> guest ok = no
> browseable = yes
> available = yes
>
> 8) I then went to the 'Status' page of SWAT and started the smbd and
> nmbd
> services.
>
> Magically, my new 'share1' now works, and I can access it from my Win98
> workstation!!! Sorry for a long post, but I wanted to be as helpful as
> possible to others in this 'group having problems with SAMBA as well.
>
> W.A. Scheer
Do you attribute any of your success to your updated RH 6.0 and the new
kernel?
--
Rinaldi -
Sometimes a cigar is merely a cigar. Sigmund Freud
Visit the crew at:
snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.test.multimedia
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Zenon Fortuna)
Subject: Re: Firewall for linux
Date: 22 May 1999 21:07:12 -0700
First of all I would recommend at this time using the "ipchains" instead
of the "ipfwadm", as this is the way Linux now evolves.
There are plenty of reading material around, but the best of all, IMHO,
is the "http://rlz.ne.mediaone.net/linux/". The site is brilliant:
Robert L. Ziegler not only collected the needed staff, but also provided
kind of "firewall calculator", which may generate a script for you.
I am very much impressed by the quality of the site.
Zenon
In article <5Oc03.1444$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Curt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In general: http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX-3.html#ss3.1
>
>IP MASQ under 2.0.x is a simplified NAT:
> http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/mini/IP-Masquerade.html
>
>IP Chain replaced masquerading in 2.2.x (a more cable NAT)
>http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/IPCHAINS-HOWTO.html
>
>proxy servers:
> socks www.socks.nec.com
> squid (don't know URL)
>
>
>Alamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:7hrkal$i86$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> Ok dumb quesiton number 2, where do I look these things up? Are these
>things
>> built into Linux or are they addon packages. Like I said I am not really a
>> linux person, this is my first attempt at setting up something like this
>> outside of the NT world.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> John Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> > On Mon, 17 May 1999 10:14:25 -0500, "Alamin"
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > >I am new to linux and have been looking for a firewall for a RedHat
>linux
>> > >box that I want to install. I basicly have 2 networks, one that has a
>> > >internet connection(perment) and the internal network. Would like to
>join
>> > >these two so that I can transfer data to and from the internet
>connection
>> > >box. The internet connection bix is running window nt and IIS 4.0. The
>> > >website on this box accesses SQL 6.5 and 7.0 databases. I guess I am
>> looking
>> > >for something like MS Proxy or a firewall package.
>> >
>> > Looks like you want IP Masquerading... if you're using the 2.0.xx
>> > kernel, look up ipfwadm. 2.2.x, it's ipchains.
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: linux.samba
Subject: Re: Samba Server not in Network Neighborhood
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 00:32:59 GMT
On Sat, 22 May 1999 17:55:34 GMT, "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have a RedHat 5.2 machine running Samba(v 1.9.18p10-3). I edited the
>> default smb.conf putting entries for the groupname, added a share, and
>added
>> some allowable hosts. I ran testparm, which found no errors, but I can't
>see
>> it on the network (I even ran a 'Find Computer...' for it w/ no success).
>> can't map a drive to the share I created either. Any ideas?
>> Morgan Terry
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you filled in the HOSTS and lmhosts files on BOTH the linux and
Win machines? You must do that. Also check and make sure your
machine names and DNS #'s coincide.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Michael Tevis)
Subject: Re: Subnet Confusion
Date: 23 May 1999 04:20:30 GMT
> In order to access a machine on a different LAN some machine on your
> LAN has to be attached to another LAN and be able to correctly route
> packets. The Linux solution for a leafnode box is to use the gateway
> between the box's LAN and the rest of the university's networks for the
> default route.
The problem is that my sysadmin insists that I don't need a gateway and
that for some reason this is the only way to get it to work. Grrr.
--Paul
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba ARRRGGGHHH!
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 00:38:50 GMT
On Sat, 22 May 1999 19:14:11 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Olbert)
wrote:
>Okay, I'm THOROUGHLY confused now about Samba. This is under RedHat
>5.2.
Have you got encrypted password on in samba? If not don't just go to
Win CD and find the pltext.inf file and dble click it. That changes
NT/98 to plain text password passing. Or you can do it the haed way
and edit the registry. <G>
I just 3 days ago finally got my Win98 <-> Linux network up with full
samba. I am no guru, this was my first shot at it, and it took nearly
a week on and off. Hang in there. BTW view with extreme suspicion
all HOWTO's etc, they are loaded with things that doi not work.
g'Luk
------------------------------
From: Gaetan Paquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sendmail relay question
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 23:47:36 -0400
mist wrote:
> Gaetan Paquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that -
> >HI,
> >
> >Can sendmail deliver the mail from a domain outside the home domain
> >without
> >specifying the hosts in that other domain?
> >For instance if I wanted sendmail in domain abc.com to deliver the mail
> >from
> >def.com could I put something like *.def.com in sendmail.cw ?
>
> RELAY_DOMAIN('def.com')
>
> in the .mc file, or in /etc/mail/relay-domains (or wherever that is set
> to.)
>
> You may need FEATURE('relay_entire_domain') but I don't think so.
> --
> Mist.
Thanks Mist,
Putting def.com in /etc/mail/relay-domains does the trick. (for version 8.9
and up)
Pic.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 00:13:56 -0400
From: Brandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP & Netscape don't see each other
Joost Gevers wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > PPP & Netscape don't see each other.
> > PPP dials ok and I get connected, but Netscape Communicator can't
> > see any URL.
> > What shall I do?
> >
> > PS: I have the same problem with 2 diff ISP.
> >
> > Config: RH 6.0 on a Thinkpad 765D (100M ram, 5.1 G HDD)
> > my modem is a PRETEC pcmcia and woks well under win98.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Dominique
> >
> > ------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> > http://www.searchlinux.com
>
> Is it possible to ping to other hosts? And traceroute works also.
> Telnet doesn't work and TCP als not. Then you have the same problem
> as I have. And I have no solution to it.
>
> If you have let me know, please
>
> Thanks,
> Joost Gevers
do a 'cat /var/log/messages' after you dial and after you try going to
any site with Netscape and see what , if any, error messsages appear in
this file
also make sure you ahve set your nameservers and dns entries
Brandon
--
"Bill Gates?, I dont know any Bill Gates. Oh, you mean 'by putting
every conceivable
feature into an OPERATING SYSTEM, whether you want it or not, is
innovation' Bill
Gates? Yeah, I know the monopolizer"
http://web.mountain.net/~brandon/main.htm
For Beginners in Linux, Emulation, Midis, Playstation Info, and
Virii.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gilford Wimbley)
Subject: Re: Modem hanging up.
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 04:43:56 GMT
On 22 May 1999 11:20:01 GMT, Roope Anttinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>this is not Linux specific problem, but since this the only even closely
>related NG I read please bear with me.
>
>I've recently got Diamond SupraExpress 336V modem which has this annoying
>feature of hanging up if theres nothing happening in the line for about 20
>seconds. I know this is a feature but havent found a way to disable it. So
>could someone give me the AT command to kill this feature?
>
>Roope
>
>--
>MicroSoft? is that some kind of a toilet paper?
>PS: Look for address here, not from headers. And remove NOSPAM's
>___________________________________________________________________________
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> +358 9 812 7567 / +358 500 445 565 / +358 49 445 565
> http://myy.helia.fi/~anttiner/index.html
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Helsinki Business Polytechnic - Institute of information technology
Are you sure that's all it is? That sounds like a ridiculous
"feature." Why would anyone ever want their modem to behave that way?
My modem hangs up after about 30 seconds if it doesn't succeed in
setting up a ppp connection. But that's a function of my ISP, not
the modem. So, maybe that could be the problem? Just a shot in the
dark. Good luck.
GW
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ramon F Herrera)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Anonymous ftp on Linux?
Date: 23 May 1999 04:52:50 GMT
What is the procedure for enabling/disabling anonymous
ftp on Linux?
TIA,
-Ramon
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
