Linux-Networking Digest #283, Volume #11 Tue, 25 May 99 19:13:57 EDT
Contents:
Re: GUI for Samba ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
bind-8.2 (Tom Georges)
Re: Dual T1's? ("Lee Sharp")
Re: Can TELNET to Linux box, but then... ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Two 3c509B's --> problems.. (Greg Franks)
Re: Firewall ("Henrik Krogh")
Determining the remote host a user logged in from (R. Christopher Harshman)
Re: PCMCIA and ether card initialization ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: DEC depca ethernet card recognized by Linux? ("Dave Perrow")
advance power management ("Paul D. Pandian")
Re: routing problem? RH 5.2 setup ("Andrey Smirnov")
Re: Can't see Samba Server from Win95 (Alexander Penev)
Re: What's a cable modem... really? ("D. C. & M. V. Sessions")
ip masquerading fine access control question (Son Trung Nguyen)
Linux + internet cable hookup ("P�r")
NFS and SETGID bit ignored ("Steve Day")
Re: Firewall ("Joel D. Cohen")
tulip.c version in linux kernels. perhaps I spoke too harshly... (Ronald Cole)
Re: Printing Question ("Andrey Smirnov")
Re: Samba and NT Domain ("Andrey Smirnov")
IP Masquerading ("Thunderbolt19")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GUI for Samba
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 17:12:08 GMT
If you're using GNOME, you can also use GNOSamba. Look at
http://www.open-systems.org/gtksamba.html
Greg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As of Samba 2.0 there is a web front end available.
> Read the docs that came with it to figure it out, it's been a while
for
> me since I last configured Samba...
>
> Philippe L� wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > Can anyone tell me where I could find an easy to use graphical front
> > end to configure SAMBA
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> > you can email your answer at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
>
> Nate Campi | "My statements in this message are
> | personal opinions which may
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | have no basis whatsoever in fact."
> / / (_)__ __ ____ __
> / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / . . . t h e c h o i c e o f a
> /____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ G N U g e n e r a t i o n . .
.
>
>
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: Tom Georges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: bind-8.2
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 13:34:24 -0400
Does anyone know if there is a binary out there for
Bind-8.2 that would work with the 2.2.x kernel?
Thanks.
Tom
--
Thomas L. Georges, SMTS BellSouth Telecommunications S&T
675 W. Peachtree St. 41B50 Atlanta, GA 30375
Office:(404)332-2178 - F:(404)420-8202 - P:(404)672-2784 #1030090
"A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can
always count on the support of Paul" - GBS
(ALL OPINIONS ARE MINE and not my employers - but they should be :)
------------------------------
From: "Lee Sharp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Dual T1's?
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 18:06:31 GMT
Gary Rule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<xLy23.8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> We have a 24/7 Internet business and our ISP has a tendancy to go down
once
> every month or two. We would like to purchase a second T1 as a backup.
Can
> anybody give me any information or point me to some, about doing this? I
> know that we would have completely different IP numbers, I would like to
be
> able to direct web traffic to that second set of numbers in case the
first
> line went down...or is there an easier way?
What you are looking for is called "multi-homing." The first step is
getting an ASN from ARIN. It is a network number assigned to your 6
consecutive Class C address space. That is as small as ASN networks get.
Once you have that, you connect your other T1 to a different provider.
Both will be on all the time, and passing traffic based on network
location. If one goes down, BGP routes will show the other as still
active, and trafic will migrate to it.
This might not be what you need. Does your ISP go down, or you link?
You may want to look at 2 T1s to the same ISP. Both leav your site from
different routers, and arrive at there site on different routers. No
single point of failier. Alternatively, you may be able to connect your
secondary pipe to there upstream with a +3 metric route. You would be
buying a failier only connection and a special static route, so it could be
quite cheap. You could also do this to a different POP of your own ISP, if
it is a backbone. Good luck.
Lee
--
SCSI is *NOT* magic. There are *fundamental technical reasons* why it is
necessary to sacrifice a young goat to your SCSI chain now and then. *
Black holes are where God divided by zero. - I am speaking as an
individual, not as a representative of any company, organization or other
entity. I am solely responsible for my words.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Can TELNET to Linux box, but then...
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 13:53:48 GMT
Remove the file /etc/nologin. This file is used to prevent users from
logging in during a shutdown. It must have not been properly removed
during your last shutdown.
In article <mn%%2.3590$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Shawn Pursley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is what I get when I attempt to TELNET:
>
> Red Hat Linux release 5.1 (Manhattan)
> Kernel 2.0.34 on an i486
> login: root
> Password:
> The system is going down on Mon Nov 16 19:04:36 1998
>
> Login incorrect
>
> and then
>
> login:
>
> I attempt to login in as root with the correct password, but get
booted out
> everytime. Anyone got any ideas?
>
> TIA,
> Shawn Pursley
>
>
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: Greg Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Two 3c509B's --> problems..
Date: 25 May 1999 18:03:57 GMT
>>>>> "Ville" == Ville Nummela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ville> I have a problem with two 3c509B Cyclones; If I plug in
Ville> just one card, everything works fine. If I insert another
Ville> card, linux says it has found one card but it doesn't
Ville> work.. any ideas..?
The Kernel only probes for one card. See the Ethernet HOWTO
(/usr/doc/HOWTO for more information). You will either have to edit
/etc/conf.modules (for modules) or lilo.conf (for built in drivers) to
get the other card recognized.
--
__@ Greg Franks, (613) 520-5726 <| _~@ __O
_`\<,_ Systems Engineering, Carleton University, |O\ -^\<;^\<,
(*)/ (*) Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6. (*)--(*)%---/(*)
"Where do you want to go today?" Outside.
------------------------------
From: "Henrik Krogh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Firewall
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 20:09:35 +0200
Joel D. Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Henrik Krogh wrote:
>
> > I am installing af linux-server (RH 5.2) as a firewall/proxy, according
to
> > the How-to.
> > I have installed 2 nic's in the server, one with an IP that is on the
> > internet and one with IP that is on our LAN.
> > The linux-server can see the internet (I am able to ping various
> > internet-adresses) and the LAN (I am able to ping local machines).
> > The computers in the LAN can ping both nic's in the linux-server, but
not
> > internet-adresses.
> > I have compiled the kernel as decribed in the How-to and Ipforwarding is
> > turned on!
> > Hope you have an answer
> > Henrik Krogh
>
> Have you set the default gateway on your clients to be the internal
address
> of
> your firewall? That could be it.
>
> -jc
Yes I have - Thanks anyway
------------------------------
From: R. Christopher Harshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Determining the remote host a user logged in from
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 18:07:38 GMT
Question for the gurus... Is there a system call or such that
can be used to tell a program which IP address it's being used
from? I need a piece of software that I'm writing to be able
to determine the logged-in user's remote host. Anyone from the
local network would be able to run the program, but anyone
outside of our LAN would not. I can write the code, once I know
how to determine the address information. I know it gets
recorded somewhere; /var/log/messages contains all that information
and more...
Thanks in advance!
--
R. Christopher Harshman http://ebhon.jnst.uor.edu/~harshman
Going for a B.S. : "Information Systems and Media Production" (JNST-UOR)
Celeron 300a | i440BX | Mystique 220 + RRStudio | SB Live! | Win98
PIII-450 | i440BX-2 | Fusion AGP 3Dfx Banshee | Yamaha PCI | Linux / NT
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.portable
Subject: Re: PCMCIA and ether card initialization
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 22:11:19 GMT
>
> Has something changed in this behavior in 6.0? I still get an
> "initialization delayed" message in 6.0.
>
You had mentioned that you had upgraded card services. IIRC the .opts
files in /etc/pcmcia are overwritten and the modules no longer
interact with the card manager as they did. The modules still work,
as you demonstrated with 'network restart', but without the RedHat
options the init scripts are confused.
My solution on a Thinkpad was to change the link in rc3.d to S06. It
seems to have fixed things ...
rick
------------------------------
From: "Dave Perrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: DEC depca ethernet card recognized by Linux?
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 15:49:33 +0100
What kind of DEPCA? is it the original 8 bit card with the mouse support or
a DE100,DE200 style card? (Look on the plate where the connector is it
should tell you there).
You need to be aware that where it goes on the bus is important, it won't
work unless it's contiguous with other cards on the bus.
I have a linux box with a DE100, DE205 and an NE2000 compatible all running
okay (kernel 2.2.2). the DE100 is irq5 io0x300 address D000 same as yours.
Georg Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7i4n8p$11g$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I've got an old 8 bit Ethernet card from Digital, which according to the
> FCC ID and to
> http://www.wi-inf.uni-essen.de/~schwarze/nt/karten/net13.html appears to
> be a DEC depca. Booting Linux 2.2.9 with Lance support compiled in it is
> not recognized, even when supplying lilo with ether=5,0x300,0xd000,eth0
> (those are the values jumpered according to the above web page).
> The LEDs do not light up either.
> Is there anything I could still try?
>
> --
> Georg Schwarz ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], PGP
2.6ui)
> Institut f�r Theoretische Physik +49 30 314-24254 FAX -21130 IRC kuroi
> Technische Universit�t Berlin http://home.pages.de/~schwarz/
------------------------------
From: "Paul D. Pandian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: advance power management
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 01:55:58 +0800
Hi everyone.
I am using RedHat 5.2 with kernel version 2.0.36. I configure it and ensure
that advance power management is selected, together with the option for
power off at shutdown selected as well. All is fine now. The system
dutifully shuts down and automatically power offs when asked to. (Saves time
hanging around waiting for all services to terminate, and then having
manually to turn the power off.)
Okay: Question. I upgraded the kernel to 2.2.0 (and tried all the rest
upwards too inlcuding the latest 2.3.3). System cannot shutdown. Even when I
selected the APM options under kernel configuration and compilation.
What do I do ?
Thanks everyone for your time.
Regards,
Paul
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: routing problem? RH 5.2 setup
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 15:25:53 -0700
Hello!
I think you need to add the following line in your *eth0 file:
NETWORK=192.168.1.0
Then reboot!
It will create a route command at the boot time to set route to network
192.168.1.0 (your local net) to via default gateway but via 192.168.1.1
interface.
Good luck!
Dean and Mary Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello folks,
>
> I have 2 ethernet cards in my linux box. One is a 3com509 (eth0) and the
> other a 3com509b (eth1). The eth1 configuration works perfectly fine and
> reaches the internet without any problem. The other one, eth0, is
> supposed to be talking to a internal net, but I can't get it to see
> anything. I suspect the card is installed ok, no errors at boot time,
> and ifconfig seems to think all is well, but I can't talk to the
> internal net.
>
> What I have in /etc/sysconfig/network is:
>
> # cat network
> NETWORKING=yes
> FORWARD_IPV4=yes
> HOSTNAME=dsl066
> GATEWAYDEV=eth1
> GATEWAY=127.67.75.65
> NISDOMAIN=""
> IPX="no"
> IPXINTERNALNETNUM="0"
> IPXINTERNALNODENUM="0"
> IPXAUTOPRIMARY="on"
> IPXAUTOFRAME="off"
>
> What I have in /etc/sysconfig/network-systems/*eth1 is:
>
> # cat *eth1
> DEVICE="eth1"
> USERCTL=no
> ONBOOT="yes"
> BOOTPROTO="none"
> NETMASK="255.255.255.248"
> IPADDR="127.67.75.66"
> IPXNETNUM_802_2=""
> IPXPRIMARY_802_2="no"
> IPXACTIVE_802_2="no"
> IPXNETNUM_802_3=""
> IPXPRIMARY_802_3="no"
> IPXACTIVE_802_3="no"
> IPXNETNUM_ETHERII=""
> IPXPRIMARY_ETHERII="no"
> IPXACTIVE_ETHERII="no"
> IPXNETNUM_SNAP=""
> IPXPRIMARY_SNAP="no"
> IPXACTIVE_SNAP="no"
>
> So far, so good, the above is working fine.
>
> Now here is /etc/sysconfig/network-systems/*eth0 that isn't working:
>
> cat *eth0
> DEVICE="eth0"
> IPADDR="192.168.1.1"
> NETMASK="255.255.255.0"
> ONBOOT="yes"
> BOOTPROTO="none"
> IPXNETNUM_802_2=""
> IPXPRIMARY_802_2="no"
> IPXACTIVE_802_2="no"
> IPXNETNUM_802_3=""
> IPXPRIMARY_802_3="no"
> IPXACTIVE_802_3="no"
> IPXNETNUM_ETHERII=""
> IPXPRIMARY_ETHERII="no"
> IPXACTIVE_ETHERII="no"
> IPXNETNUM_SNAP=""
> IPXPRIMARY_SNAP="no"
> IPXACTIVE_SNAP="no"
>
>
> Here is the results of running route -n
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
> Iface
> 127.67.75.64 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248 U 0 0 7
> eth1
> 127.67.75.0 127.67.75.65 255.255.255.248 UG 1 0 0
> eth1
> 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 4
> eth0
> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 3
> eth0
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 5
> lo
> 0.0.0.0 127.67.75.65 0.0.0.0 UG 1 0 0
> eth1
>
>
> And here is what ifconfig -a shows:
>
> ifconfig -a
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
> RX packets:53 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:53 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:20:AF:3F:61:DD
> inet addr:192.168.1.1 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:4186 errors:2 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:2
> TX packets:55 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0
> Interrupt:7 Base address:0x200
>
> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:60:97:73:12:8D
> inet addr:127.67.75.66 Bcast:127.67.75.71
> Mask:255.255.255.248
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:1234 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:74 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0
> Interrupt:5 Base address:0x300
>
> Any ideas why eth0 can't see the internal net??? -- Dean
------------------------------
From: Alexander Penev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can't see Samba Server from Win95
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 22:14:19 GMT
Mike Dion wrote:
> My Samba Server and WIN 95 computer are on separate network segments and I
>
> would like to share my Samba Server's filesystem with the Win95 computer.
>
> To date all of my attempts to configure Samba have failed and I have yet to
>
> see any Samba services from my Win95 computer! The DOS command "net view
>
> \\computername" fails with an error 51 and message that the remote
>
> computer is not accepting or responding to requests.
>
> Background:
>
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> - Win95 computer on LAN with Windows NT Server "TIMNT" as primary
>
> Domain Controller and Master Browser; Domain is domain
>
> - PC can reach the Linux box by ping, traceroute, ftp, etc.
>
>
How do you ping it ? ping copmuter_name or ping ip_adress
I hope that you succeed it only with the IP adress. If so you have only to
insert an entry in the a file named "hosts" in your Win95 box, reboot and it
will work or respectively use a wins server for windows name resolution (aour
NT server for example)
>
>
> - Samba Server (Linux) is on a separate network segment direct connected
>
> to the segment on which the Win95 PC resides
>
> - Samba server resides n the DMZ, between a Cisco router and
>
> firewall computer
>
> - Red Hat Linux V5.2 and have installed samba-1.9.18
>
> - testparm against smb.conf replies "Loaded services file OK"
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> I'm stumped -- is the firewall the problem? It has never been a problem in
>
> the past. The firewall has always permitted traffic to flow thru providing
>
> that requests were initiated from the inside?
>
> Your help in this matter would be greatly appreciated!
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Mike D.
>
> Halifax, NS Canada
>
> ------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: "D. C. & M. V. Sessions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: What's a cable modem... really?
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 11:24:26 -0700
Brandon wrote:
> D. C. & M. V. Sessions wrote:
> > Chris wrote:
> > > The reason why I'm asking is because I'm wondering if it is possible to
> > > hook two computers up to an ethernet hub... and have the cable modem as the
> > > third device on the hub. In other words, instead of having two ethernet
> > > cards in one computer (the one that has the internet connection), each
> > > machine would have one card and use the cable modem through the hub. I'm
> > > just asking this out of curiosity; I'm not going to try to do this (yet) :)
> >
> > That depends on whether you want all of you local network traffic
> > to show up on the neighborhood cable, and all of the local neighborhood
> > cable traffic to show up on your local network. In the first case
> > there are some notable security and privacy issues; in the second, it
> > depends on whether you want your local network throughput to drop
> > whenever your neighbors do a download.
>
> how would that change just by giving only the one computer direct access
> to the cable modem thereby putting in 2 ethernet cards in the
> 'gateway'...or would the results change at all?
If only one computer has access to the bridge, the forwarding rules
on that computer can limit traffic on the segment between it and the
bridge to packets going to or from the Internet, and keep packets that
aren't destined for the local machines from reaching the local net.
IOW, if the cable modem isn't a router, ADD ONE.
--
| Microsoft: "A reputation for releasing inferior software will make |
| it more difficult for a software vendor to induce customers to pay |
| for new products or new versions of existing products." |
+---------- D. C. & M. V. Sessions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----------+
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Son Trung Nguyen)
Subject: ip masquerading fine access control question
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 21:15:51 GMT
Dear netter,
I am somewhat of a newbie to ip masquerading and wonder if you can
show me how I can activate and deactivate an ip number from my rules.
For example let say I have activated ip masking for two machines on
my internal network. ie
ipfwadm -F -a m -S aaa.bbb.ccc.180/32 -D 0.0.0.0/0
ipfwadm -F -a m -S aaa.bbb.ccc.181/32 -D 0.0.0.0/0
and now for some reason, I want to turn off access to machine aaa.bbb.ccc.180
but leave the other one active. Right now all I know how to do is an
ipconfig eth0 down
but this isn't too nice because both machines now can't access the outside.
There must be a way with ipfwadm where I can remove only the aaa.bbb.ccc.180
without affecting aaa.bbb.ccc.181 I have read through the faqs but like
usual, I missed it, so I apologize if it is in there. I will read it
again
just in case.
Further more, is there a way you can restrict the bandwidth through one
of the ip? ie allow only a 1200 bps through aaa.bbb.ccc.180 and give the
rest of the bandwidth to the other machine? Hope you can do this.
Any pointers, hints, solutions is so greatly appreciate.
thanks in advance
------------------------------
From: "P�r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux + internet cable hookup
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 22:40:18 GMT
Hi!
I have a problem when i try to connect to my ISP (Telia Internet Cable),
It works great in Windows (?!) but i cant get it up on my linuxmachine!
I have a PCI NE2000 network card that works fine with 'ne2k_pci' drivers
compiled in the kernel (2.2.7). I can recieve my network settings via DHCP
but then it stops..
I have tried the default DHCP client that comes with RedHat 5.2, and i was
told to download 'dhcpcd' from freshmeat.net but that didnt work either..
I do recieve the correct IP setting (the same as i get in Windows) and it
sets my default route to 172.22.0.1 (also the same in windows..).
When i try to contact the nameserver (10.0.0.1) nothing happens, when i try
to list my routes it take several minutes to to show my default route that
dhcpcd put up..
If anyone have any ideas that might help, please email me..
/P�r
Some info that i get from dhcpcd :
IP : 172.22.3.240
Netmask : 255.255.252.0
Broadcast : 172.22.3.255
Gateway : 172.22.0.1
------------------------------
From: "Steve Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NFS and SETGID bit ignored
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 19:30:22 +0100
I have a problem with an NFS mount:
The exported directory has the mask 2770, when I mkdir within it I get the
bits inherited correctly...
...but if I mount it via NFS and mkdir within the mount, the directory
hasn't inherited the permissions. (it's 0755 instead).
Another thing, if I try putting a @users(rw) in my exports file instead of
the user name steve(rw) - it refuses to mount. ?
Can anyone give me a nudge in the right direction?
Cheers
Steve Day
Linear Designs
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Joel D. Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Firewall
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 13:34:08 -0400
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============EA3E0721E522A3F786A63503
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64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==============EA3E0721E522A3F786A63503
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=iso-8859-1;
name="jcohen.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Description: Card for Joel D. Cohen
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="jcohen.vcf"
YmVnaW46dmNhcmQgCm46Q29oZW47Sm9lbAp4LW1vemlsbGEtaHRtbDpUUlVFCm9yZzpDeWJl
ciBEaWFsb2d1ZSwgSW5jLgphZHI6Ozs7Ozs7CnZlcnNpb246Mi4xCmVtYWlsO2ludGVybmV0
Ompjb2hlbkBjeWJlcmRpYWxvZ3VlLmNvbQp0aXRsZTpTeXN0ZW0gQXJjaGl0ZWN0CngtbW96
aWxsYS1jcHQ6OzIzMjMyCmZuOkpvZWwgQ29oZW4KZW5kOnZjYXJkCg==
==============EA3E0721E522A3F786A63503==
------------------------------
From: Ronald Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: tulip.c version in linux kernels. perhaps I spoke too harshly...
Date: 25 May 1999 12:09:04 -0700
I installed Red Hat 6.0 on the firewall where I was having random
network hanging problems with the tulip driver and my Kingston NICs
that was "corrected" by bringing down the interface and then bringing
it back up and re-adding the route.
Well, It's been two weeks without a hangup. Perhaps my problem was
Slackware 3.4 or linux-2.0.36 compiled under said distribution. The
world may never know...
--
Forte International, P.O. Box 1412, Ridgecrest, CA 93556-1412
Ronald Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Phone: (760) 499-9142
President, CEO Fax: (760) 499-9152
My PGP fingerprint: 15 6E C7 91 5F AF 17 C4 24 93 CB 6B EB 38 B5 E5
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Printing Question
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 15:16:46 -0700
Hello!
You need to enable TCP protocol on your HP LJ printer (are you using
JetDirect?).
Then read LP-HOWTOs!
Good luck!
Arthur Merar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I am fairly new to Linux. I just installed Red Hat 5.2. My network
> consists of a Windows 98 box, my Linux box and an HP LJ 4M+ network
> printer.
>
> Everything is talking fine except the Linux box and the printer. The
> printer does not seem to have an IP address. Rather it has a network
> name and hardware address......since I think Windows 98 uses the
> Client for Netware Networks and stuff.
>
> Anyhow, I'm not sure how to install the printer so I can print to it
> from either Windows or Linux. Can someone help me?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Please send response to e-mail.
>
> Arthur
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc,linux.samba,comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Re: Samba and NT Domain
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 15:14:01 -0700
Hello!
If you already have an NT domain, you can use your PDC or BDC to validate
logon to Samba box.
In /etc/smb.conf:
1) set workgroup = NT domain name
2) security = server
3) password server = IP address of your PDC
Then restart smb (/etc/rc.d/init.d/smb restart)
Your user should be able to see shares on Linux box, except one little
thing - if user does not have account on Linux box, will not be able to see
home dir.
But if your PDC is down, you need to change password server setting in
smb.conf!
Also solves the problem with encrypted password not working from NT & 98
boxes.
Good luck!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7idctn$7a6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I've read the MAN pages, and the samba howto, but I've still got some
> questions about how to make it work with an NT Domain. I've got an
> NT PDC, and two NT BDC's. I'm trying to set up my linux box so that
> when I try to connect to a SAMBA share, it checks the name and password
> against the NT password. I've tried setting security=server, but when I
> do that I can't even browse the shares on the samba box. I think
> this may be a problem with the guest account, but I don't know what
> it is. When I set it to security=domain, every user needs to have an
> account on the linux box, but I don't know how to automate that. I
> understand that there is a way to add something to smb.conf to make it
> work, but I didn't understand other posts on how to do that. I'll
> attach a copy of my smb.conf. Are there any SAMBA gurus who can help me
> start getting rid of NT on my network? Thanks,
> Greg.
>
> P.S. sorry for the cross post, but I need to get this figured out by the
> end of the week or the server will be made into NT...
>
>
>
>
> ;********************section global*****************
> [global]
> workgroup = ntdom
> comment = greg's attemt at SAMBA
> strict locking = no
> share modes = yes
> password server = primus
> local master = no
> security = SERVER
> encrypt passwords = yes
> wins support = no
> os level = 0
> domain master = no
> prefered master = no
> preserve case = yes
> netbios name = linux
> case sensitive = no
> printing = bsd
> printcap name = /etc/printcap
> load printers = False
> print command /usr/bin/lpr -r -P %p %s
> create mode = 0755
> ;********************section homes******************
> [homes]
> comment = Home Directories
> browsable = True
> writable = yes
> read only = no
> preserve case = yes
> short preserve case = yes
> ;********************section userdata***************
> [userdata]
> comment = All userdata that you are allowed to see.
> path = /home
> writable = yes
> create mode = 0770
> ;********************section gregsplace*************
> [gregsplace]
> browsable = yes
> comment = This is a test share
> path = /root
> writable = no
>
>
>
>
>
> --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
> ---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: "Thunderbolt19" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP Masquerading
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 18:24:14 -0400
Do I have to have a static IP to do IP Masquerading if Im dialed into my ISP
via a modem? Thanks...
--
Eric Waters
Total Distribution, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
