Linux-Networking Digest #316, Volume #11 Fri, 28 May 99 09:13:42 EDT
Contents:
SMC 8115T Token Ring driver ? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IPX and IPPPD (Stefan)
Re: Booting Diskless Client - Linux 2.2.6 (Andy Pershin)
SAMBA & Win95 Logon authentication (James Dingwall)
Re: IP-Masq and Unreal (Ghordjazz)
Re: Can't see Samba Server from Win95 ("W.A. Scheer")
Samba question No. 974537637 * 10^7 (Heiko Senner)
Re: LINUX/NT connectivity (Andrew Williams)
Re: Linux read a win98 floppy? (Edmondo)
Re: HOW-TO: PPP route? ("Curt")
Re: Network Device Drivers (J. Rieling)
crazy networking scheme (sam)
Re: AOE Game + IP Masq ("TiM")
RedHat 5.2 install. SMB and FTP options dont work. ("Avnish Gupta")
Re: @home ("TiM")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SMC 8115T Token Ring driver ?
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 11:02:19 GMT
I'm looking for a driver for the SMC TokenCard 8115T .
It seems that someone worked on it, but no driver found yet...
Any hints ?
Please reply to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Stefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IPX and IPPPD
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 15:13:54 +0200
Hi
I want to connect a Windows PC to a Novell File Server. I configured a
Linux-PC as a =
Dialin-Server and with TCP/IP everything works fine (PPP over ISDN with
ipppd). Then
I gave the ipppd parameters for IPX and switched the TCP/IP off. But now
when
the Win95 Client tries to connect they stop. If you look in the log
files you see
that it received the node-numbers and the network-number and then it
loops forever
: It receives the node-numbers and the network-number again and again.
The Linux System is a SuSE 6.0.
Stefan Retta
PS I=B4m Sorry for my bad English
------------------------------
From: Andy Pershin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Booting Diskless Client - Linux 2.2.6
Date: 28 May 1999 06:37:54 GMT
Hello!
Tom Daley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Experiencing weirdness with Linux 2.2.6 kernel booting on a diskless
>> Alpha client. When mounting the local filesystems I see:
>>
>> RPC: sendmsg returned error 51
>> RPC: sendmsg returned error 51
>> RPC: sendmsg returned error 51
>> RPC: sendmsg returned error 51
>> portmap: server localhost not responding, timed out
>> lockd_up: makesock failed, error=-5
>>
>> This happens numerous times. However, if I wait long enough all my
>> filesystems get mounted properly. Anybody else see this? Is there a
>> patch?
>>
TD>
TD> I see this as well. I have not figured it out yet, so I still run
TD> 2.0.36 on the diskless client. The server is running 2.2.7.
Run portmap before mounting remote fs.
--
Andy Pershin [ Registered Linux user #71727 ]
[ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ][ http://www.penza.com.ru/~apa ]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Dingwall)
Subject: SAMBA & Win95 Logon authentication
Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 20:22:26 GMT
Hi,
I'm trying to set samba up to authenticate win 95 client logons. I'm
having troubles since I don't know on which side things are set up
properly. At the moment I can get my 95 clients to bring up a message
from the logon which says "No Domain Controller was available to
authenticate the password, some net services may be unavailable" (or
similar) I'm sure that I've got samba set up properly and I've tinkered
with the 95 network settings (wins enabled, NT domain logon enabled).
Just in case it helps I've included the global section of my smb.conf.
(Other possibility is I need new samba & PDC but I thought that was for NT
clients)
Many Thanks,
James
(CCed replies via email appreciated if poss:)
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from spook.jkd.net.uk (192.168.1.1)
# Date: 1999/05/26 23:38:41
# Global parameters
workgroup = JAMES
netbios name = SPOOK
server string = SERVER MACHINE
hosts allow = 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0 127.0.0.1
interfaces = 192.168.1.1/255.255.255.0
remote announce = 192.168.1.0
keepalive = 30
preferred master = Yes
domain master = Yes
wins support = Yes
os level = 65
lm announce = Yes
time server = Yes
log file = /var/log/log.smb.%M
max log size = 50
status = Yes
security = user
domain logons = Yes
logon script = %U.bat
logon path = \\Spook\profiles\%m\%U
smb passwd file = /usr/lib/samba/private/smbpasswd
guest ok = Yes
guest account = nobody
invalid users = root,ftp,www
# unix realname = Yes
hide dot files = No
follow symlinks = No
preserve case = Yes
short preserve case = Yes
case sensitive = No
printing = lprng
print command = /usr/local/bin/lpr -r -b -m %U -P%p %s
lpq command = /usr/local/bin/lpq -P%p
lprm command = /usr/local/bin/lprm -P%p %j
printer driver location = /usr/lib/samba/printers
load printers = No
printer driver file = /usr/lib/samba/printers/printers.def
--
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| James Dingwall |
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED] +
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
+ http://www.fen.bris.ac.uk/students/jd5477/ +
| Maintainer: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/~lqzweb/ |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ghordjazz)
Subject: Re: IP-Masq and Unreal
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 11:34:59 GMT
On Fri, 28 May 1999 02:42:37 -0400, "Matt Goebel"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>Hey maybe you are the guy to talk too. My Windows machines are connected to
>the net by via IP masquerading through my Redhat 6.0 box. I've also got a
>firewall setup. I've been trying to get AOE and a few other games to
>connect to the outside world so I can play some games! I've been unable to
>do so as of yet. I was wondering what you did to get everything setup and
>working? Also are you able to host games? I'd really like to get this
>working ASAP, I've been unable to kick some butt for awhile. Thanks.....
Being a newbie to Linux, I just following the mini-howto for IP
Masque, and Unreal piped through it instantly. Are you connected via
dial-up or a LAN? You can try tweaking your firewall setup to see if
it ain't stopping your gaming. Many new tools have popped up to
replace the IP Masque modules that are needed for some things, i.e.
Quake. IPPORTFW, IPMASQADM, IPAUTOFW, REDIR, UDPRED, and other Port
Forwarding tools can be read about at:
http://members.home.net/ipmasq/ipmasq-HOWTO-1.65-6.html#ss6.8
Unreal is the only game I tried, and it worked flawlessly. I'm sure I
won't be so lucky with my other games. I got a load of games and I'll
let you know which ones work and don't.
--
ghordy
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 23:56:37 -0700
From: "W.A. Scheer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Can't see Samba Server from Win95
A little clarification is in order:
the protocol 'NetBeui' is not routable. 'Netbeui' and 'NetBIOS' are not the
same thing. SMB over TCP/IP routinely encapsulates NetBIOS within the IP packet
and is therefore routed.
It would be interesting to know if the SAMBA server works when attached to the
same subnet as the Win95 client.
.
____________________________
Fernando wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> It is not possible to route the protocol Netbios.
>
> Like this, if I understood correctly, if Cisco router is between Win95 box
> and Linux box (Samba Server), you should enable Netbios on TCP/IP in your
> router.
>
> I hope that helps
>
> Fernando
> Sao Paulo/SP - Brazil
>
> Mike Dion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu nas not�cias de
> mensagem:7iefo2$8o5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > My Samba Server and WIN 95 computer are on separate network segments and I
> > would like to share my Samba Server's filesystem with the Win95 computer.
> >
> > To date all of my attempts to configure Samba have failed and I have yet
> to
> > see any Samba services from my Win95 computer! The DOS command "net view
> > \\computername" fails with an error 51 and message that the remote
> > computer is not accepting or responding to requests.
> >
> > Background:
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > - Win95 computer on LAN with Windows NT Server "TIMNT" as primary
> > Domain Controller and Master Browser; Domain is domain
> > - PC can reach the Linux box by ping, traceroute, ftp, etc.
> >
> > - Samba Server (Linux) is on a separate network segment direct connected
> > to the segment on which the Win95 PC resides
> > - Samba server resides n the DMZ, between a Cisco router and
> > firewall computer
> > - Red Hat Linux V5.2 and have installed samba-1.9.18
> > - testparm against smb.conf replies "Loaded services file OK"
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> > I'm stumped -- is the firewall the problem? It has never been a problem
> in
> > the past. The firewall has always permitted traffic to flow thru
> providing
> > that requests were initiated from the inside?
> >
> > Your help in this matter would be greatly appreciated!
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Mike D.
> > Halifax, NS Canada
> >
> > ------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> > http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: Heiko Senner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba question No. 974537637 * 10^7
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 11:50:18 +0200
Hi!
1. Can I ,logged in as a standard user, do a smbmount?
2. I was never able to do a smbmount, not even as root. Each server
tells me that it couldn't identify me. This is so frustrating, because
with Win98 you're able to click into these shares like nothing!!
Many thanks, Heiko Senner (Germany)
------------------------------
From: Andrew Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: LINUX/NT connectivity
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 12:56:26 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you want to know a bit more about smbmount, look at section 4.14 on
my web-page. It does not matter what filesystem NT uses - all exports
are the same.
Jean-Michel ROCHET wrote:
> I have got LINUX and NT4.0 hosts on my network.
> Does somebody knows if it's possible to see the NT hosts files
> (NTFS) into the X file manager or thru a navigator such as KDE's on
> a Linux host?
>
> Thanks...
>
> JMR
--
Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect, especially on my
http://www.germanynet.de/teilnehmer/101/69082/samba.html
Simple Samba Solutions web page. ICQ 1722461
__________________________________________________________
| Fight Spam! Join EuroCAUCE: http://www.euro.cauce.org/ |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
------------------------------
From: Edmondo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux read a win98 floppy?
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 12:45:25 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try mount -t vfat /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy
With the -t vfat option, you define the filesystem you want to use,
in this case vfat (win95/98 filesystem).
edmondo
Dave wrote:
>
> Is there any way to mount a floppy in RedHat 6 that will allow it to read a
> Win98 floppy?
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HOW-TO: PPP route?
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 06:57:10 -0500
Sorry this doesn't make sense yet.
Could you draw me a picture?
For example:
internet
| ppp
|
gateway1
|
|
| local ethernet
| network (192.168.x.y)?
|
|
gateway2
|
| ppp
|
4 hosts ????
Are all 4 connected at the same time?
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:7ilsip$b0a$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In article <N%l33.132$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I guess I don't understand what is going on here.
> > All 4 systesm connected via the same ppp connection?
>
> yup
>
> > Are you just connecting 2 networks?
>
> not exactly, just a single network with small part that will connect
> via PPP dial-up instead ethernet.
>
>
>
>
> With regards,
>
> Serge.
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (J. Rieling)
Subject: Re: Network Device Drivers
Date: 28 May 1999 13:24:02 +0200
man ksyms
--
__________________________________________________________________________
dr. j. rieling / daimlerChrysler aerospace, orbital systems & operations
fon +49 421 5395643 fax +49 421 5395127 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: crazy networking scheme
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 13:24:05 +0100
I have some spare RJ45 network cards and was wondering whether I could
use these in any way to avoid having to buy a hub for a small hobby
beowulf system. Basically, can I have two network cards per system and
set up a daisy chain affair with crossover cables? I know this isn't
the easiest way of going about it but I'm just curious about a use for
presently unused equipment. If this crazy idea could work then what
performance issues will I face?
Thanks
Sam
------------------------------
From: "TiM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: AOE Game + IP Masq
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 12:31:30 GMT
Using Kernel: 2.0.33 or better:
Put this in your ipfw script:
ipautofw -A -r udp 1410 1450 -h www.xxx.yyy.zzz
ipautofw -A -r tcp 1410 1450 -h www.xxx.yyy.zzz
www.xxx.yyy.zzz is the ip of the computer playing the game.
The Game actually opens a variety of ports depending number of players. I'm
not sure if this works for the ZONE AOE players for for (IRC - EFNET) #AOE
players this works fine if you have your Linux box as headend and your
Window boxes are behind it.
Happy gaming!
Matt Goebel wrote in message <7ig2ej$nma$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi,
>Anyone out there get games like AOE to work over a masqueraded internet
>connection? I'd prefer to host on the online gaming zone but I'm not sure
>this is possible? It's launched via a webpage. I've also got a firewall
up
>that blocks out all unusual ports that these games may be using. So if
>anyone knows what ports any of the popular games are using please post them
>so I can alter my firewall to allow connections on these ports. Thanks
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Avnish Gupta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RedHat 5.2 install. SMB and FTP options dont work.
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 17:51:25 +0530
I am trying to install Red Hat Linux 5.2 using the following options:
SMB option:
I have shared the cdrom on a WIN98 machine giving read only access to
everyone. The IP address of this machine is 192.168.103.50. and the name is
xyz. After using supplemental disk and partitioning i configured my network
adapter. For network configuration i chose the following options:
IP Address: 192.168.103.144
Netmask: 255.255.255.0 (same as that of WIN98 machine)
Default Gateway: 192.168.103.144
Primary Nameserver: 192.168.103.144
Domain Name: pqr
Host Name: abc.pqr
Secondary Name Server: None
Tertiary Name Server: None
SMB Server Name: xyz
Share Volume: cdrom
Account Name: None
Password: None
After this configuration i get the message "I could not mount that directory
from the server". The only way to come out of this is Ctrl+Alt+Del.
Ping to Linux machine gives the following output:
Pinging 192.168.103.144 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.103.144: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.103.144: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.103.144: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.103.144: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
Ping statistics for 192.168.103.144:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 1ms, Maximum = 1ms, Average = 1ms
What could be wrong?
FTP option:
I have a WINNT 4.0 machine (Name: def, IP address 192.168.103.254, Subnet
Mask 255.255.255.0) which is a FTP server. Its cdrom is made a Virtual
Directory with name /cdrom. I have allowed read only anonymous access to
this.
After using supplemental disk and partitioning i configured my network
adapter. For network configuration i chose the following options this time:
IP Address: 192.168.103.135
Netmask: 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway: 192.168.103.135
Primary Nameserver: 192.168.103.135
Domain Name: pqr
Host Name: abc.pqr
Secondary Name Server: None
Tertiary Name Server: None
FTP Site Name: 192.168.103.254
Red Hat Directory: cdrom
i didnt choose the option "use non-anonymous FTP or a Proxy Server"
After this i was prompted for the list of packages to install and i chose
everything.
I got the message "I cannot get file
cdrom/RedHat/RPMS/setup-1.9.2-1.noarch.rpm: File not found on Server". When
i clicked OK i got the message "I m having trouble getting %s. Should i keep
trying?" I selected No. This time i got the message "I cannot get file
cdrom/RedHat/RPMS/filesystem-1.3.2-3.noarch.rpm: File not found on Server".
And so on. The only way to come out of this is Ctrl+Alt+Del.
When i used the follwing command "dir setup*.*" on my cdrom using my WINNT
4.0 machine i got the following list of files:
setup-1.9
setuptool-1.0-1
and the command "dir file*.*" gave me the following results:
file-3.25-2
filesystem-1.3
fileutils-3.16-10
When i use "ftp 192.168.103.254" from my WIN98 machine which i mentioned in
the SMB option i can login using the following information:
User: anonymous
Password: none
Here i can browse all my directories. I used the following command "cd
/cdrom/redhat/rpms" and it worked well. It also displays the list of rpm
packages using the command ls. But here also the same names are displayed
which i saw using the command "dir *.*" on my WINNT machine.
Pinging my Linux machine from my WINNT machine gives the following result:
Pinging 192.168.103.135 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.103.135: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.103.135: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.103.135: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.103.135: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=64
What could be wrong?
I am not a regular visitor to newsgroups so please cc at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanx in advance.
Avnish Gupta
------------------------------
From: "TiM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: @home
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 12:36:34 GMT
If you have a static IP (as most @Home users do) hard code yer IP numbers
instead of using DHCPCD. You can get all your settings from your Windows box
OR from the members services page via @Home (Members Services -> Home
Networking -> Network Address -> Network Address (in the scroll window) ->
Enter your username and password -> Click "here")
David Moran wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Iam having problems geting my linux box to connect with the
>@home DHCP server. I have tryed using the DHCPCD -h (user
>id) and it will not connect.
>
> Any help will be apprecated,
> David
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
