Linux-Networking Digest #362, Volume #11 Tue, 1 Jun 99 07:13:56 EDT
Contents:
Re: Apache not authorized to read public_html dir (John Hovell)
Re: Sendmail can't start in RH (Villy Kruse)
tulip & 3c509: Module load order sensitivity? (Bob G)
Re: Linux and AIX (David Braid)
traffic-shaping on more than one if? (Birger Toedtmann)
Re: twisted pair problem using a hub ("Ron van Middendorp")
Re: twisted pair problem using a hub ("Jan Johansson")
Re: Samba 2.0.3.x prompt... ("Ron van Middendorp")
ezppp (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Patte)
LOOK WHAT SOMEBODY PUT ON THEIR WEBSITE! 1920 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Redhat 5.0 ppp help needed ("Bob Da Bolina")
Re: Printing across from linux to win95 via LAN (Anas Alam Faizli - dukemawar)
Re: PPPD on Redhat requires set-uid root (Heiko Hellweg)
frame? (Rikard Bosnjakovic)
Re: Apache not authorized to read public_html dir (Geert Altena)
Re: News server under Linux: inn-2.2 (Karthikeyan)
Re: twisted pair problem using a hub ("Ron van Middendorp")
NIS configuration (Ian Dobson)
Best Linux Networking Book (Darren Greer)
IPMASQ does'n work with some URL's ("Jeroen Doorschodt")
Best NIC for RH 6.0??? (scott)
Re: You can earn $50,000 40686 ("Selious")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: John Hovell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Apache not authorized to read public_html dir
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 05:34:33 GMT
Mads --
I think I see your problem --
Mads Skov Hansen wrote:
> Please help. Subj. is driving me nuts!
>
> When browsing to servername/~user/ I get "You are not authorized to view
> this page".
> My /etc/skel includes the public_html dir, and I have tried adding a
>
> <Directory /home/*/public_html>
> AllowOverride None
> order deny,allow
> allow from all
> </Directory>
>
> in access.conf.
> I have already checked that the public_html dir under each user has the 755
> access rights.
> When enabling 755 access rights to the user dir itself, everything is fine
> and the homepages are shown.
> I'm running RedHat 5.2.
You need the /home/username to have 755 access rights as well. (Default RedHat
does not give this.)
Oops... I just read more carefully -- you already figured that out. This is
annoying. I don't like to make my user directory world-readable either ;-).
So, create a directory like /usr/web/ and make a subdirectory for each user
there, and set up the conf file accordingly. Make sure the /usr/web directory
is 755 too ;-).
Good luck!
-John
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Villy Kruse)
Subject: Re: Sendmail can't start in RH
Date: 1 Jun 1999 09:54:39 +0200
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Eric LEMAITRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Yes, these suc...r.s .... very nasty boys from Red-Hat have put POP-3
>package into IMAP one. So, in order to use POP-3, you must install IMAP
>package. What a silliness !
>IMAP is a very different standard for Email from POP-3, this could'nt be
>guessed easilly at all.
>I love Linux Red-Hat, but for this I am angry. I lost hours finding it out.
Then direct 25% of the anger to the fine pine people at Washington University
who put the pop as an addon to the imap servers package. Maybe you should
be happy that you didn't have to dig out the pop server as a part of the
entire pine package. ;-)
And 50% of the anger to redhat for not installing the imap package as one
of the basic packages always to be installed.
Villy
------------------------------
From: Bob G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: tulip & 3c509: Module load order sensitivity?
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 05:45:11 GMT
I just finished a frustrating round of getting dual PCI Netgear FA310TX
NICs to be recognized together with an ISA 3COM 3C509. The system is a
RedHat 6.0 upgrade from 5.2 (also upgraded from 4.2). I'd wanted them to
load as follows (from my original /etc/conf.modules):
alias eth0 tulip
alias eth1 3c509
alias eth2 tulip
I ran the diagnostics for each card using the manufacturer utilities
with zero errors, and confirmed the presence of link indicators each
time, but always got the ever-helpful "initialization delayed" message
when Linux started.
I then tried several times to get a D-Link DFE-530TX recognized as eth2
using the via-rhine module, also without luck.
I also re-compiled my kernel with all (tulip, via-rhine and 3c509)
configured as monolithic drivers, with absolutely no success despite a
variety of append= options in /etc/lilo.conf
Finally, I tried loading them as follows:
alias eth0 tulip
alias eth1 tulip
alias eth2 3c509
and viola! It all worked. Sadly, this was only after tearing apart
another PC in order to get a known-good Netgear card and wasting a few
hours. Obviously, I either missed something or there's some sort of
requirement that modules for similar NIC types be initialized together,
or?
Are there any such dependencies on load order? Are there any references
to this anywhere?
Any info appreciated.
Thanks,
- Bob
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Braid)
Subject: Re: Linux and AIX
Date: 1 Jun 1999 08:41:53 GMT
It sounds to me to a miss match between full and half duplex. I have the same
problem between SUN boxes and AIX boxes connected through a switch where the
ftp speed was 8kbs. after forcing all boxes to the same full duplex things
started to hum along perfectly...
DB
>In article <7ibqh7$ato$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mitch Appleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>| We have the same setup Redhat 5.2 and AIX/RS-6000. We use a 10/100 switch
>| from Kingston, however, I've seen 4 port 10/100 hubs from Net Gear, that
>| work well, for less than $89. This is a no brainer and it comes with LEDs
>| for band width.
>
> What am I missing? If you mean he should check his cable, sure, good
>idea. Otherwise, how could adding a hub speed something which is messed
>up with direct connect.
>
>| Thomas Mielke wrote in message <7i95u5$sqm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>| >I have a performance problem between a Linux PC with a PCI RTL8139 10/100
>| MB
>| >Ethernet card and a IBM RS/6000 with a 10MB Ethernet card. Both connected
>| by
>| >a UTP-cross cable.
>| >
>| >The PC detects the 10MBit max speed and half-duplex, nevertheless I have a
>| >network speed of max 30kByte measured with ftp.
>
>I would think modern cards could do full duplex, but be very sure you
>have set the duplex on the AIX box to match the Linux box. If one is
>trying to do full duplex you will not be a happy camper.
>
>Look at the error counts and such on the AIX box with entstat.
>
>--
>bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
> One common problem is mistyping an email address and creating another
>valid, though unintended, recipient. Always check the recipient's
>address carefully when sending personal information, such as credit
>card numbers, death threats or offers of sexual services.
>
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 10:44:44 +0200
From: Birger Toedtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.development.system,linux.dev.kernel
Subject: traffic-shaping on more than one if?
Hi,
did anybody try out this nice traffic-shaper under 2.2.x? I know it is
ALPHA, but anyway, i need
to slow down eth traffic on an adaptec-quad-card (4 ports, tulip chips).
NIC works fine, so
i get 4 if's and after loading shaper.o, i wanted to attach shaper0 ->
eth0, shaper1 -> eth1....,
but shapecfg accepts this only once, reporting on followups "device not
ready".
It seems as if shaper.o/shapecfg supports only 1 (!) shaper if, is that
right?
Would be nice if someone would share (not shape=;)) some experiences on
shaper.o and more
than one if, wether it is possible at all etc...
Regards,
Birger
--
Birger T�dtmann. Bielefeld, Germany.
echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq' | \dc
00 83 E2 57 EC 60 0B 1C D3 18 AE 2A 40 55 81 22
------------------------------
From: "Ron van Middendorp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: twisted pair problem using a hub
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 11:07:03 +0200
Reply-To: "Ron van Middendorp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
OK, and now the RIGHT answer?!?!?
Jan Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7itrih$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> Ron van Middendorp wrote in message <7itr93$qg5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >Are you using the same cable?
> >If so, this is a crossed one (since it worked without a hub) and this
will
> >not work through the hub....
>
>
> If he was, NO traffic would go trough.
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Jan Johansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: twisted pair problem using a hub
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 11:13:43 +0200
Ron van Middendorp wrote in message <7j07mc$ff0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>OK, and now the RIGHT answer?!?!?
Probably a race-condition caused by the added latency of the hub, i dont
want to speculate in that, i just pointed out the impossibility of your
suggestion about using a Crossover cable since this clearly wouldnt give the
symptoms the original poster described.
------------------------------
From: "Ron van Middendorp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba 2.0.3.x prompt...
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 11:08:32 +0200
Reply-To: "Ron van Middendorp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thank U;-))
patrick putteman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7iu5p7$p68$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> the smbmount command changed entirely. Smbmount will now ask for your
> username and passwd (if you didn't specify it at the command prompt) and
> then leave you at a prompt
> just type the mount command at this prompt ex: to mount a wfw share on
mount
> point /net:
> smb> mount /net
> You will then recieve the normal linux prompt once again and your wfw
share
> will be mounted on /net
>
> Hope this helps ;o)
>
> Patrick
>
> Ron van Middendorp wrote in message <7itrqv$r2t$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >Hi,
> >
> >I recently upgraded from Samba 1.9.18.x to 2.0.3.x and now I get this
weird
> >prompt when doing a smbmount to the Win98-box.
> >What's with this prompt? What can I do there?
> >
> >All I want is to work with the files on the Win-Share, never got this
> prompt
> >before and I can't seem to find any info on it.
> >What am I missing?!
> >
> >Kind regards,
> >Ron van Middendorp
> >
> >
>
>
------------------------------
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Patte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ezppp
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 09:01:25 +0200
Does anybody know how to cofigure ezppp?
Thank you.
-- Fran�ois Patte. UFR de math�matiques et informatique.
45 rue des St P�res. 75270 Paris Cedex 06
Tel: 01 44 55 35 59 -- Fax: 01 44 55 35 35
http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: LOOK WHAT SOMEBODY PUT ON THEIR WEBSITE! 1920
Date: 1 Jun 1999 07:59:44 GMT
http://38.201.46.9/index.asp?rs=n52399
<a href="http://38.201.46.9/index.asp?rs=n52399">CLICK HERE</a> TO CHECK IT OUT
wwfvcddpqfcklhjxwmqxtiyrusmdhxhwwwfwwyexmmssmexcgbbiqmezqpnywqhh
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 00:56:40 -0600
From: "Bob Da Bolina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Redhat 5.0 ppp help needed
I am in severe need of help. I can log on to my server, access elm, telnet
and all that happy stuff. But when I try to start ppp I get garbage then NO
CARRIER.
Seyon has been my choice for a connection. I am currently using
Hurricane (RedHat 5.0) on an Aptiva. Anyone out there able to give me a
run-down or point me in a direction? I'll send soft to helpers.
--
====================
Bob Da Bolina
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.apollo3.com/~cblack
------------------------------
From: Anas Alam Faizli - dukemawar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.networking,jaring.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Printing across from linux to win95 via LAN
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 10:32:07 +0800
samba really works nice in interoperating from either windows/linux
you can even send a linuxpopup message to a window box and vice versa
same goes to printing
------------------------------
From: Heiko Hellweg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPPD on Redhat requires set-uid root
Date: 01 Jun 1999 09:13:49 +0200
"DUGRES Hugues, IT Manager at C.Q.E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a problem with pppd on a linux redhat 5.2 release.
>
> Must be root to run /usr/sbin/pppd, since it is not setuid-root
>
> Moreover, I wish to setup a call back --> User logs in an pppd calls
> back to a preset phone number.
man mgetty
>
> /dev/cua0
> crw------- 1 root uucp 5, 64 mai 5 1998 /dev/cua0
> /dev/modem
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 mar 25 14:17 /dev/modem ->
> /dev/cua0
i think, you ought to use /dev/ttySx nowadays
>
> /usr/sbin/pppd
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 106876 jun 8 1998 /usr/sbin/pppd
the usual setup is, to have pppd suid root but not grant execute
permissions to everybody, rather have a group (its "dialout" for me,
make it "pppusers" in your case) that can execute it.
-rwsr-xr-- 1 root dialout 83952 Aug 4 1998 /usr/sbin/pppd
>
> /etc/ppp/
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 1024 mai 25 16:33 .
> drwxr-xr-x 22 root root 2048 mai 28 13:41 ..
> -rw------- 1 root daemon 78 jun 8 1998 chap-secrets
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 265 oct 15 1998 ip-down
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 349 oct 15 1998 ip-up
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root daemon 61 mar 26 11:04 options
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 28 mar 26 11:11 options.ttyS0
^^^^^
this should fit the used device (see /dev/cua0 above)
if you don't trust your users too much, you ought to explicitely define
some options (notably make sure, connect, disconnect, ip-up, ip-down
and ipparam dont compromise your system) since users can define their
own values with ~/options.ttyname - this may let them execute stuff
as root with some pppd implementations.
--
============================ Heiko Hellweg ===========================
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~hellweg/
10% of our customers account for 90% of our service cost: those who
actually use our product, plus the ones who were injured unpacking it.
------------------------------
From: Rikard Bosnjakovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: frame?
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 09:29:32 +0200
When doing `ifconfig`, i get 'frame: 2'. A friend of mine has 0, and
another has 41. What is this value anyway?
--
// Rikard Bosnjakovic - http://a214.ryd.student.liu.se/ - ICQ: 1158217
======================================================================
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in his shoes. That
way, if he gets angry, he'll be a mile away - and barefoot.
======================================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Altena)
Subject: Re: Apache not authorized to read public_html dir
Date: 1 Jun 1999 11:37:20 +0200
John Hovell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> When browsing to servername/~user/ I get "You are not authorized to view
>> this page".
>> My /etc/skel includes the public_html dir, and I have tried adding a
>>
>> <Directory /home/*/public_html>
>> AllowOverride None
>> order deny,allow
>> allow from all
>> </Directory>
>>
>> in access.conf.
>> I have already checked that the public_html dir under each user has the 755
>> access rights.
>> When enabling 755 access rights to the user dir itself, everything is fine
>> and the homepages are shown.
>> I'm running RedHat 5.2.
>You need the /home/username to have 755 access rights as well. (Default RedHat
>does not give this.)
>Oops... I just read more carefully -- you already figured that out. This is
>annoying. I don't like to make my user directory world-readable either ;-).
You don't need to have the /home/user dir to be "+r" for world, "+x"
(chmod o=x /home/user) would be enough. This works for me (Apache 1.3.6)
Is "mod_userdir" loaded? That could be the case.
HTH,
\Geert.
--
Geert Altena | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Coffee, black, no sugar
Finger for PGPkey : Diffie-Hellman 2048/0xC540C550
Spookline (Hi there!) : FBI CIA NSA Scud ICBM VX Iraq DIA DEA EFF PGP
------------------------------
From: Karthikeyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: News server under Linux: inn-2.2
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 12:36:17 +0530
Hi,
I think this statement "May 26 13:26:54 junior16 innfeed[3250]:
nntp0.tha.uk.quza.net:0 cxnsleep no
permission to talk: 502 You have no permission to talk. Goodbye." means
the that server has not accorded permission to u'r machine to access it. So
check the access permission list in that machine.
Secondly U may have to configure u'r incoming.conf file (it contains the list
of all
newsservers which will feed u).
Check it out.
Cheers
Karthik
"Juan Ignacio P�rez Sacrist�n" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I�m trying to run inn-2.2 in RedHat 6.0 . I haven�t still got the server
> to suck news from external servers. Configuration and logs are these:
>
> Part of /etc/news/innfeed.conf ... :
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
> peer news.mad.ttd.net {
> hostname: news.mad.ttd.net
> max-connections: 10 # override global value.
> }
>
> peer news.bcn.ttd.net {
> hostname: news.bcn.ttd.net
> }
>
> peer nntp0.tha.uk.quza.net {
> hostname: nntp0.tha.uk.quza.net
> }
>
> peer news.redestb.es {
> hostname: news.redestb.es
> }
>
> peer news.iddeo.es {
> hostname: news.iddeo.es
> }
>
> peer news.servicom.es {
> hostname: news.servicom.es
> }
>
> peer news.encomix.es {
> hostname: news.encomix.es
> }
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> Part of /etc/news/innfeed.status ... :
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> news.mad.ttd.net
> seconds: 0 art. timeout: 600 ip name: news.mad.ttd.net
> offered: 0 resp. timeout: 300 port: 119
> accepted: 0 want streaming: yes active cxns: 0
> refused: 0 is streaming: no sleeping cxns: 0
> rejected: 0 max checks: 25 initial cxns: 1
> missing: 0 no-check on: 95.0% idle cxns: 1
> deferred: 0 no-check off: 90.0% max cxns: 1/10
> requeued: 0 no-check fltr: 50.0 queue length: 0.0
> spooled: 0 dynamic method: 3 empty: 0.0%
> [overflow]: 0 dyn b'log low: 25.0% >0%-25%: 0.0%
> [on_close]: 0 dyn b'log high: 50.0% 25%-50%: 0.0%
> [sleeping]: 0 dyn b'log stat: 37.5% 50%-75%: 0.0%
> unspooled: 0 dyn b'log fltr: 25.0 75%-<100%: 0.0%
> full: 0.0%
> backlog low limit: 0
> backlog upper limit: 0 (factor 1.10)
> backlog shrinkage: 0 bytes (from current file)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> Part of /var/log/messages ... :
>
> May 26 13:26:53 junior16 innfeed[3250]: news.mad.ttd.net:0 connected
> May 26 13:26:53 junior16 innfeed[3250]: news.mad.ttd.net remote MODE STREAM
> failed
> May 26 13:26:54 junior16 innfeed[3250]: nntp0.tha.uk.quza.net:0 cxnsleep no
> permission to talk: 502 You have no permission to talk. Goodbye.
> May 26 13:26:54 junior16 innfeed[3250]: nntp0.tha.uk.quza.net spooling no
> active connections
> May 26 13:26:56 junior16 innfeed[3250]: ME source format bad Exiting :
> May 26 13:26:56 junior16 innfeed[3250]: news.mad.ttd.net final seconds 3
> offered
> 0 accepted 0 refused 0 rejected 0 missing 0 spooled 0 on_close 0 unspooled
> 0 deferred 0 requeued 0 queue 0.0/200:100,0,0,0,0,0
> May 26 13:26:56 junior16 innfeed[3250]: nntp0.tha.uk.quza.net final seconds
> 2 spooled 0 on_close 0 sleeping 0
> May 26 13:26:56 junior16 innfeed[3250]: nntp0.tha.uk.quza.net global seconds
> 2 offered 0 accepted 0 refused 0 rejected 0 missing 0
> May 26 13:26:56 junior16 innfeed[3250]: news.redestb.es final seconds 3
> offered 0 accepted 0 refused 0 rejected 0 missing 0 spooled 0 on_close 0
> unspooled 0 def
> erred 0 requeued 0 queue 0.0/200:100,0,0,0,0,0
> May 26 13:26:57 junior16 innfeed[3250]: news.mad.ttd.net:0 final seconds 4
> offered 0 accepted 0 refused 0 rejected 0
> May 26 13:26:57 junior16 innfeed[3250]: news.mad.ttd.net global seconds 4
> offered 0 accepted 0 refused 0 rejected 0 missing 0
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> Juan Ignacio P�rez Sacrist�n
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Ron van Middendorp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: twisted pair problem using a hub
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 12:03:14 +0200
Reply-To: "Ron van Middendorp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Well, I'm stunned...
Jan Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7j088c$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> Ron van Middendorp wrote in message <7j07mc$ff0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >OK, and now the RIGHT answer?!?!?
>
>
> Probably a race-condition caused by the added latency of the hub, i dont
> want to speculate in that, i just pointed out the impossibility of your
> suggestion about using a Crossover cable since this clearly wouldnt give
the
> symptoms the original poster described.
>
>
------------------------------
From: Ian Dobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NIS configuration
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 01:33:55 GMT
I'm trying to setup a NIS server for RH 6.0 one PC acting as a server
and 2 workstations.. its more of an exercise really than a real project
at this point.
anyway I've read thru the docs, and I think I'm more confused now :(
does anyone have some sample config files that I can use to get it up an
running, or at least point me in the right direction?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Darren Greer)
Subject: Best Linux Networking Book
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 01:34:45 GMT
Hello all.
I am interested to find out what books Linux Network Administrators
out there are using as references/guides to mainting a network using
Linux. Things such as configuration, performance tuning, etc, are a
key factor in what I am looking for. I read the review of "The Linux
Network" in LJ, but it seems to be "streamlined" for slackware. I am
using Debian, so any book(s) that anyone can point out, will be
greatly appreciated. Thanks,
Darren
------------------------------
From: "Jeroen Doorschodt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IPMASQ does'n work with some URL's
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 12:03:45 +0200
Hi there,
I've linux 2.0.35 running with a teles ISDN connection to my ISP.
>From my LAN (192.168.x.x) I can internet through my linux-box. BUT.
>From some URL's I sometimes get the index.html in my Explorer or Netscape
but that's it. They doesn't work.
When I dialin from my Windows-box to my ISP I can see them!!!
I think 5% of the URL's we can't see, including out own homepage!!!
THanks,
Jeroen @eqs.nl
EQS B.V> Zoetermeer, Holland
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (scott)
Subject: Best NIC for RH 6.0???
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 23:12:42 GMT
I'm converting my NT Quake2 server over to Linux (RH 6.0) and I'm wondering
what this group's recommendations are as far as a 10/100 NIC. I want a very
fast card that has good linix support out of the box (I'll be doing an FTP
install). Right now I have an Intel Pro/100+. This should work but is it
optimized? Are there faster cards for Linux? If you recommend a card please
make it a current card (one I can search for in pricewatch and readily buy.).
I also have access to a linksys etherfast 10/100. It works but I've read
mixed reviews about its speed.
Thanks for the help.
Scott
------------------------------
From: "Selious" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.mail.eudora.ms-windows,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: You can earn $50,000 40686
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 09:57:06 +0200
I think everyone needs a unique global ID (on your passport). That way, they
can't get new addresses !!
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
