Linux-Networking Digest #375, Volume #11 Wed, 2 Jun 99 12:13:28 EDT
Contents:
X-Win32, Crack Code ?? ("Fong's")
Win98 dial-in to Linux route to Novell - Help please ("Carl Filpo")
can't connect to my isp using kppp ("Melle")
problem with inn (news server) ("Emmanuel Varin")
Re: PPP to ISP fails (Clifford Kite)
Re: Modem i/o conflict problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Newbie need help on installing Network Card "Genius LAN GE2500III (rddog)
Re: Help, Apache won't run my cgi (Lee Sau Dan ~{@nJX6X~})
TCP/IP ("steve")
Problems with RedHat 6.0, help! ("David Murray")
Re: Free Win98 Telnet client incl. keymapping? (Nicholas Golder)
Re: DIALD building problems with RH5.2 (Mike Bartman)
Linux + Win98 with IP Masquerading (Paul Wilson)
Re: Access ZIP drive attached to Linux PC from windows? ("Mac Q. Flores")
Help on fetchmail ("Wolfgang Vogel")
Re: Help! is pci nic compatible with 486 board? (Stuart R. Fuller)
Re: Setup an network through LT Modem? (M. Buchenrieder)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Fong's" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup,hk.comp.os.linux,tw.bbs.comp.linux
Subject: X-Win32, Crack Code ??
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 13:10:36 +0800
Do the How to Crack the X-Win32 V.4.12
http://www.starnet.com/product.htm
That can Runing the X-Window on the Win95 & NT platform..
Is great , but no code can only work for one hour & cannot Login many
machine at same time....
Hackers!! Help!!
Send the code to me by [EMAIL PROTECTED]!!
Thanks,
Fong's
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Carl Filpo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Carl Filpo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Win98 dial-in to Linux route to Novell - Help please
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 13:13:49 +0800
Desperately need help setting this up.
Scenario:
site A network:
Linux Server with Dialin running mgetty, ipxd
Novell Server
site B (standalone PC):
Windows 98 running dial-up networking client
Site B needs to dial in to the linux box and access the novell server.
At the moment I can successfully connect. I can access the Internet from
the 98 dialup client through the Linux box (IP masquerading). The linux
box has a modem for dialing out to the Internet (/dev/ttyS1) and another for
dialing in (/dev/ttyS0).
I can't however see the novel server.
I have ipxd running. The ethernet device eth0 has an IPX address and the
dial-in adapter ppp0 also
gets assigned one after the dial in has occurred. It just seems thatit is
not routing ipx from ppp0 to eth0.
I have read the IPX howto and the Linux: IPX over PPP howto.
Any advice would be most appreciated.
Here are my setup files:
============================================================================
===========
/etc/ppp/options.ttyS0:
emissary:emissary-dialin-0 # 192.168.0.20 : 192.168.0.200
asyncmap 0
netmask 255.255.255.0
proxyarp
lock
crtscts
modem
+pap
# IPX stuff
ipx
ipx-network 0xABCDEF01
ipx-node 2:0
ipx-routing 2
ipx-router-name Linux_router
ipxcp-accept-remote
============================================================================
====================================
--
Carl Filpo
Computer Network Consultant
=================================================
Carl Filpo BSc(Curtin)
Computer Network Consultant
C&M Computer Solutions
26 Russell St
MORLEY WA 6062
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 08 9375 1144
Fax: +61 08 9375 1141
Mobile: 0407 396 316
=================================================
------------------------------
From: "Melle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: can't connect to my isp using kppp
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 13:47:59 +0200
Hi,
i've got a problem with my RH5.2 distribution of linux! i configured kppp
the way it was shown in several comp-magazines for logging in at my isp's
server using PAP - but it doesn't work at all.
the modem dials properly, but it fails to log in. my isp said that my login,
password and servername should be added to the file /etc/ppp/pap-secrets,
but i don't know how in detail. there are two lines of introduction: the
format of an entry should be something like:
client server secrets IP adresses
but what does this mean? i'm not good in English at all (you may have
noticed that already *grin*) since i'm from Germany, hmm.
if you know the answer to my problem please mail me to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanx, Melle
------------------------------
From: "Emmanuel Varin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: problem with inn (news server)
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 16:12:08 +0200
the restrictions in nnrp.access aren't apply with netscape communicator
under windows although with outlook express, it work well
anybody have an idea ???
Manu.
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: PPP to ISP fails
Date: 2 Jun 1999 09:11:27 -0500
Andy Greenshaw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Serial connection established.
: Using interface ppp0
: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x23eac2b9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x42 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0x209e88c5> <pcomp>
: <accomp> < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 11 01 46 52 45 45 2d 4d 55 4c 54 49 4c 49 4e
: 4b>]
: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x42 < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 11 01 46 52 45 45 2d 4d 55 4c
: 54 49 4c 49 4e 4b>]
: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x23eac2b9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x43 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0x209e88c5> <pcomp>
: <accomp>]
: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x43 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0x209e88c5> <pcomp>
: <accomp>]
: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x2 "No network protocols running"]
: rcvd [LCP TermAck id=0x2]
: Connection terminated.
: Connect time 0.1 minutes.
It's curious that pppd doesn't attempt to negotiate an IP address, which
is the most likely reason for "No network protocols running." This would
happen if pppd is given the option "noip" or the older option "-ip",
but there's nothing else I know about that would do it - given the
messages above.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Governments should be changed like diapers - often and for the
* same reason. */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Modem i/o conflict problem
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 14:59:38 GMT
curt,
I tried that, there no body is using this address.
Any help ?
-krishna
In article <H9D03.1525$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Remove the board, and take a look at /proc/ioports to see what already
has
> those addresses taken.
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7hun76$7h7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > HI,
> > I am facing a probelm while installing(isaconf) a modem(Digicom 56K
> > D-F-V-SP DI3658) on RH6.0 the following is the error message :
> >
> > =================
> > /etc/isapnp.conf:118 -- Fatal - resource conflict allocating 8 bytes
of
> > IO at 0x3E8 (see /etc/isapnp.conf)
> > /etc/isapnp.conf:118 -- Fatal - IO range check attempted
> > while device activated
> > /etc/isapnp.conf:118 -- Fatal - Error occurred executing request'
> > <IORESCHECK> ' --- further action aborted
> > ====================
> >
> > The PNPDUMP returns 4 possible IO address which are same as that of
> > ttyS0-ttyS3. I tried all of them, but the result is the same.
> >
> > Any Help ?
> >
> > thanx in advance
> > krishna
> >
> >
> > --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
> > ---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
>
>
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: rddog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Newbie need help on installing Network Card "Genius LAN GE2500III
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 00:37:14 -0500
Well, i had a similar problem, just not with that card. I found if you set the
module to ne2k-pci that it worked just fine. You might try that, or just see
what modules that come close. (You can add modules with linuxconf, under
adaptor settings... or you could do it other ways, im just not sure how. ;P)
good luck..
rddog
Thay Sothun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anybody knows how do I installed network card called Genius LAN
> GE2500III PCI Ethernet Adapter. I could not installed it during the
> installation process since Linux listed me not the one I have such 3COM, NE
> 2000 Compatible,...
>
> Any idea would be much appreciated.
> Best regards,
> Sothun
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
__
/ / __ __ __ __ __ __ __
/ /__ / / / \/ / / /__/ / \ \/ /
/_____/ /_/ /_/\__/ |_____/ /_/ \_\
Don't fear the Penguin.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Sau Dan ~{@nJX6X~})
Subject: Re: Help, Apache won't run my cgi
Date: 02 Jun 1999 23:41:15 +0800
>>>>> "TURBO1010" == TURBO1010 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TURBO1010> Perl is installed, it's appache that doesn't run it,
TURBO1010> don't know what else to do. I've made it executable,
TURBO1010> used .shtml, don't know what else to do.
Is it WORLD-executable? If you have root privilege, you may create a
dummy account and use it to test your script.
--
Lee Sau Dan $(0,X)wAV(B(Big5) ~{@nJX6X~}(HZ)
.----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
| http://www.cs.hku.hk/~sdlee e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
`----------------------------------------------------------------------------'
------------------------------
From: "steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: TCP/IP
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 08:58:33 -0700
HELP...
I have a linux box, megabit service, additional DSL line & 5 USR modems w/
lines. I wish to start a mini ISP just for fun. My second computer is a
dual 400 pentium with 80 GB raid on windowsNT. I would make this my linux
box but no drivers for linux support the raid card. Is there a way to
network the computers together so that someone may download off the main
server ?? I have a cisco swtich and all the required components necessary
for networking...
please let me know.
-Steve
------------------------------
From: "David Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problems with RedHat 6.0, help!
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 14:47:05 GMT
I just deleted my RedHat 5.2 partition and re-installed with 6.0. However,
I am having a variety of problems I don't know how to solve or why they are
happening.
1) Network card doesn't work. it is detected by the module and ifconfig
shows it to work just fine. It is assigned an IP address of 10.0.0.101 by
DHCP and route shows that 10.0.0.0 is routed through eth0. Yet, a simple
ping to the machine next to it with IP address 10.0.0.67 doesn't work
either direction. I am stumped.
2) Can't recompile kernel. Well, I can, but can't use it. Lilo tells me
the kernel is too big. it is only 480K, which is much smaller than the
kernel that Redhat6.0 came with and was using before I recompiled it.
Theirs is 1,469,449 bytes.. So Why can theirs work, but mine (which is only
33% of the size) is too big?
I have a variety of other smaller issues which I am sure I can figure out,
but these two are irritating me to no end.. and until I get the kernel
compiled and the network card working I am stuck! please help!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Nicholas Golder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Free Win98 Telnet client incl. keymapping?
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 10:43:11 -0500
Depending on what you define as expensive, there is
Kermit95:
http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/k95.html
Also, Symantec has a program known as Procomm Plus.
That has a world of utilities but tends to be much more expensive.
Here at Iowa State University, we have a site license on a telnet product that
is distributed by Hummingbird.
http://www.hummingbird.com/
Nick
Dave Ewart wrote:
> Sorry if this is not 100% on-topic, but can anyone recommend a (preferably
> free) Telnet client to run on a Windows 98 client which has facilities to
> alter keymappings? I currently use SCO Vision's VT420, which is expensive.
> I have downloaded a demo of CRT, which looks OK, but again will be expensive
> to install on multiple workstations.
>
> Thanks for any pointers ...
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Ewart, Computing Manager
> Imperial Cancer Research Fund (Cancer Epidemiology Unit), Oxford
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Bartman)
Subject: Re: DIALD building problems with RH5.2
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 15:54:42 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 01 Jun 1999 07:31:33 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gilford
Wimbley) wrote:
>On 31 May 1999 10:05:46 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>(Villy Kruse) wrote:
>>In article
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>Mike Bartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>There is no "__errno_location" field in icmp.h, just an "errno" field
>>>in a structure. I'm assuming that the __errno_location symbol is
>>>being generated by the compiler, right? Why? And how to I get past
>
>>That errno field in a structure should be renamed to something else
>>as there is a #define errno somewhere in the headers.
Thank you!
Is there a way to get gcc (cc) to generate a full listing file? On
VMS I can generate a listing with line numbers and all macros and
includes expanded. It makes tracking down this sort of problem very
easy...just edit the listing and do a search for the offending string,
then look to see where it came from. I looked over the gcc man and
info pages and I couldn't find anything that would do this. I found
things that got me *some* of what I wanted (like macro expansions and
typedefs), but it left out the actual source...just had a lot of blank
lines. Is there a way to get a *full* listing of what actually got
compiled?
>>Also, version 0.16 needs up to patch level 5 before it compiles on redhat
>>system. You'll run into other problems, too if you don't.
>>
>>Look at the contrib.redhat.com see if there is a rpm version you can
>>download. It has been there fore ages, including patch level 5.
Thanks!
>It took me like three days to figure out what do with the patch, but
>hey, learning is fun. Let me know if you can't find the patch, and
>I'll email it to you or something.
I found the patch...and, yes, I'm trying to figure out what to do with
it now! :^) I assume it has something to do with the "patch" program,
but I haven't figured out how to use that yet... :^)
>ps, the patch has to be applied to a pristine copy of 0.16, so if you
>don't have a pristine version of the source, still, you might need to
>download it again.
No, I kept the tar file around. Disk space is cheap...modems are
slow! :^)
BTW - I signed on to the diald mailing list and found that 0.16-5
isn't the most recent version. 0.99 seems to be. This is from a
message on that list:
-----------------
The new version is 0.99 and can be found at http://diald.unix.ch/
____________________________________________________________________
Robert Paulsen http://paulsen.home.texas.net
-----------------
Thanks for the help, both of you!
-- Mike "I'll lick this thing yet!" Bartman --
================================================================
To reply via e-mail, remove the 'foolie.' from the address.
I'm getting sick of all the spam...
================================================================
------------------------------
From: Paul Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux + Win98 with IP Masquerading
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 15:58:10 GMT
I've searched allover the place and can't find an answer to this (if
there is one elsewhere, a pointer to it would be nice...)
I have a Slackware box running kernel 2.2.6 with all the kernel options
configured as the IP Masquerade FAQ says to along with the rc.firewall,
etc. The only difference is I'm using 10.10.10.0/24 as my internal
network class C. eth1 on my Linux box is configured as 10.10.10.1 and
the Windows box is 10.10.10.2. Someone told me I should be using the
192.168 netblock but couldn't give a definite reason why.
ipchains shows that ICMP is being masqueraded, ping and traceroute work
fine from the Windows machine to the outside world. ipchains also shows
UDP being masqueraded (netbios from the Windows box). But, as soon as I
try to ftp or use netscape, ftp gives some obscure Windows error number
and netscape says "unable to create network socket". Any ideas?
I can send more info later on today when I'm at home if needed.
Paul
------------------------------
From: "Mac Q. Flores" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Access ZIP drive attached to Linux PC from windows?
Date: 2 Jun 1999 15:29:07 GMT
if you are already able to access your ZIP drive from your linux PC, the
next step is to make sure that you can access your linux PC from your
windows boxes. to do this you need to run and configure SAMBA in your
linux PC. read
http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/SMB-HOWTO.html
also, smb must be configured in your kernel. on the windows side, they
must be running client for MS networks.
=============================
Erik Cuynen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<7j2hiu$p36$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Hi,
>
> at our office, we recently have installed a linux PC, being part of a
large
> ethernet network.
> The other 4 PCs are running win98 and are connected to the network as
well.
> what must be done in order to allow all 4 PCs to read and write files
from a
> ZIP
> drive attached to the linux PC???
>
> Please provide sufficient information, I am a Linux newbie ; - )
>
> Thank you in advance!
> erik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> system: SuSE 6.1
> Pentium II
> ZIP 100 MB
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Wolfgang Vogel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help on fetchmail
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 17:09:59 +0200
Hi to everybody,
after having leafnode and fetchmail stable on a SuSE 6.0 linux system I
worked around on a SuSE 6.1 with
an INN 2.2 and again the pine/fetchmail subsystem. But I got the following
errors:
bash-2.02# fetchmail -vvv
fetchmail: 4.7.5 querying mail.btx.dtag.de (protocol POP3) at Wed Jun 2
15:28:16 1999
fetchmail: POP3< +OK T-Online POP3 Server fpopd ready.
fetchmail: POP3> USER root
fetchmail: POP3< +OK Ok.
fetchmail: POP3> PASS *
fetchmail: POP3< +OK Ok.
fetchmail: POP3> STAT
fetchmail: POP3< +OK 14 31519
fetchmail: POP3> LAST
fetchmail: POP3< -ERR Command not supported.
fetchmail: Command not supported.
fetchmail: POP3> UIDL
fetchmail: POP3< +OK Ok.
fetchmail: POP3< 1 7bf1039db15b45fd
fetchmail: POP3< 2 b4c9cc9167f1ec83
fetchmail: POP3< 3 cd6f05247eb461cd
fetchmail: POP3< 4 54b9bce39187dbdb
fetchmail: POP3< 5 d96e17b197528624
fetchmail: POP3< 6 a71a43a2831e8ca6
fetchmail: POP3< 7 e942c374b4fca6d7
fetchmail: POP3< 8 45859d55f61a8891
fetchmail: POP3< 9 7ccfa303e593ec1c
fetchmail: POP3< 10 348c402a93539e36
fetchmail: POP3< 11 ac76c2b55682dcfa
fetchmail: POP3< 12 71a2221cac7aed18
fetchmail: POP3< 13 ab4bce8d1d6bf031
fetchmail: POP3< 14 fb1bb8f44c06867e
fetchmail: POP3< .
14 messages for root at mail.btx.dtag.de (31519 octets).
fetchmail: POP3> LIST
fetchmail: POP3< +OK 14 messages.
fetchmail: POP3< 1 2162
fetchmail: POP3< 2 2673
fetchmail: POP3< 3 2431
fetchmail: POP3< 4 1500
fetchmail: POP3< 5 2105
fetchmail: POP3< 6 1360
fetchmail: POP3< 7 1735
fetchmail: POP3< 8 4090
fetchmail: POP3< 9 1722
fetchmail: POP3< 10 1723
fetchmail: POP3< 11 2012
fetchmail: POP3< 12 2576
fetchmail: POP3< 13 3341
fetchmail: POP3< 14 2089
fetchmail: POP3< .
fetchmail: POP3> TOP 1 99999999
fetchmail: POP3< +OK Ok.
reading message 1 of 14 (2162 octets)
fetchmail: SMTP connect to localhost failed: Connection refused
fetchmail: POP3> QUIT
fetchmail: POP3< Your crap from Die, 01 Jun 1999:
fetchmail: SMTP transaction error while fetching from mail.btx.dtag.de
fetchmail: Query status=10
fetchmail: normal termination, status 10
What the hell is going wrong ? Did I drive crazy about the thousands - what
did I say - millions
of the INN howtos, readmes and config.conf's ?
Who can give me a quick hint
Thanks to everybody who can help
W.Vogel
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stuart R. Fuller)
Subject: Re: Help! is pci nic compatible with 486 board?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 16:00:02 GMT
Gary Helbig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Rey,
:
: Your motherboard is probably PCI-1.0. PCI 2.0 came out about the
: time 90MHz pentiums did.
:
: Your NIC card is probably PCI-2.1. It's probably real new.
:
: There are known problems trying to use a bus mastering PCI-2 card in
: a PCI-1 system. Basic problem is that it doesn't work reliably. This
: kind of why they went to PCI-2.
:
: Don't toss the motherboard if it's still useful; put the ISA NIC
: back in, or get a 100MBit ISA NIC.
:
Wait a minute here. You know what all the above is impossible.
According to my "Microsoft Networking Essentials" training, there are no ISA
100Mb NICs, and there is no PCI for 486?! Are you saying that the book is
wrong?
Stu
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: Setup an network through LT Modem?
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 11:22:41 GMT
"Z. Zhan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>hi, everybody
>I'm kind of newbie in Linux. I just installed Redhat linux5.2 but I got
>problem in setting up the dial-up networking. I just try to follow the
>procedures listed in a linux book. Unfortunatelly, I couldn't get through.
>My dial-up will be between my home and the school internet service. I have
>56K LU PCI modem in my machine.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
[...]
This is not a modem. It is a digital-analog converter that puts all
real work onto the CPU of the host system via some sort of Win9x
VXD driver. It will never work outside of a Win environment at all.
Sell it to a Win9x-only user and buy a fine external USR V.90
model instead (or an Acer V90, e.g.) .
Michael
--
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
Note: If you want me to send you email, don't munge your address.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
