Linux-Networking Digest #439, Volume #11 Mon, 7 Jun 99 06:13:32 EDT
Contents:
Re: Linux and ADSL with GTE ("Ron")
Re: can't connect to my isp using kppp (DonJr)
Re: I HATE SAMBA and NT!!!! ("Jan Johansson")
HELP: 3Com 100BaseT/56K card under Linux 6.0 (SLK230)
Re: networked card not found ("Gavin Clark")
Token Ring network ("Stephen Smith")
Re: problems with internet in Mandrake (Jason Stokes)
Re: Can't connect to my ISP yet, here's the pppd-output... (DonJr)
Re: can't connect to my isp using kppp (Ron Olsen)
RedHat & ISDN ("Luigi Trovato")
Re: can't see network card - no driver? ("Gavin Clark")
Re: I HATE SAMBA and NT!!!! (Stephen Carville)
mismached read page pointers ("Gavin Clark")
Re: Warning against Announce Communications web hosting ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
browsing samba 2.0 from NT (Robert Kiendl)
NIC Cards needed badly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
useradd problem under SuSe 6.1 (Vincent Ridderikhoff)
Sendmail relaying from other IP networks ("Martin Button")
Re: Sendmail relaying from other IP networks ("Jan Johansson")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply-To: "Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux and ADSL with GTE
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 06:36:17 GMT
If someone could send me there gte adsl network setup
for redhat 6.0 (2.2.5-15) I think I could use the example
to make my setup work. I can get all the necessary info
from win98 using winipcfg. But I am uncertain as to what
goes where exactly. Just a bit confused by the fact that
its a dynamic address and not a static address. Also
I am confused by what my hostname should be.
This is in Network Configurator: localhost.localdomain
This is in Winipcfg: Cheyanne.dsl.gtei.net
and is my domain:
dsl.gtei.net
or gtei.net
or gte.net
so you can probably see that a working network setup
would be a great help.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Joe Halpin wrote:
>
> > I'm attempting to help out some friends who have a small business.
> > They'd like to install a server that would allow more than one person in
> > the office to access the internet at the same time. I've suggested Linux
> > to run the server.
> >
> > The problem is that they would like to get an ADSL line in for the
> > connection to the ISP, and their phone company is GTE. This is a problem
> > because the GTE support staff says they absolutely refuse to support an
> > ADSL line that's being used by a Linux box.
> >
> > I couldn't get any kind of reason for this out of them, but I did see
> > some stuff on the web about GTE and Microsoft getting into bed together,
> > which probably explains it.
> >
> > Could anyone here recommend another approach that would give equivalent
> > cost/performance? I'd like to prevent the "buy NT, and everything that's
> > needed to do anything useful with it" syndrome if I could. They're not
> > exactly made out of money.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Joe
> > --
> > I didn't want to be here, where the future is in store
> > but my name is on the mailbox, and my key fits in the door
> > - Bob Bennett (the musician, not the lawyer)
>
> I'm on ADSL from GTE and they didn't give a crap what OS I was using as
> long as I put all the numbers they provided where they needed to go.. As
> far as tech support, I haven't called one of those lines for a few years
> just because the monkeys that usually man the phone lines couldn't figure
> out what you were talking about unless you worded the question exactly as
> they have it printed in front of them. I've had much better support online
> from groups like this. My $.02.
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: DonJr <donjr@[127.0.0.1]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: can't connect to my isp using kppp
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 03:47:06 -0400
Bev wrote:
>
> Melle wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > i've got a problem with my RH5.2 distribution of linux! i configured kppp
> > the way it was shown in several comp-magazines for logging in at my isp's
> > server using PAP - but it doesn't work at all.
> > the modem dials properly, but it fails to log in. my isp said that my login,
> > password and servername should be added to the file /etc/ppp/pap-secrets,
> > but i don't know how in detail. there are two lines of introduction: the
> > format of an entry should be something like:
> > client server secrets IP adresses
> > but what does this mean? i'm not good in English at all (you may have
> > noticed that already *grin*) since i'm from Germany, hmm.
> > if you know the answer to my problem please mail me to:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > thanx, Melle
>
> We could never get it to work under RH either, so we just copied over the
> files from our slackware installation. Here is what the /etc/ppp/pap-secrets
> file should look like:
>
> # Secrets for authentication using PAP...
> # client server secret IP addresses
> "yourloginname" * "yourpassword"
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Bev
> ====================================================================
> "We thought of one of those discount store caskets, but, frankly, we
> were worried about the quality." -- mortuary commercial
Basicaly put "kppp" is not written for the Red Hat Dastro and will not
work without major configuration change.
The easiest way I've found to setup pppd under RH 5.2 or RH 6.0 is:
# linuxconf { either under X or text mode take you pick}
- Networking
- Client tasks
Select PPP/SLIP/PLIP
Click the ADD button
Make sure PPP is selected
Click the Accept button
Fill in the following fields
Phone Number
Modem Port
Click the use PAP check button
Login Name
Password
Click the Customize button
Select Allow any user (de)activate the interface
Click the Accept button
Click the quit button on the PPP/SLIP/PLIP page
Select Name server specification (DNS)
Fill in the Name Server Information asked by this page.
Click the Accept button
Click the Quit button
Press enter on the next screen to apply the updates.
Now at the command prompt
$ /sbin/ifup ppp0 will bring up the connection
$ /sbin/ifdown ppp0 will bring down the connection
Under X simplily load the program "usernet" is a simple to use one to
get you started, though there are other choices out there.
RedHat 5.2 and 6.0 versions of the Linux Dastro's are simple enough,
even a MicroS*t user should be able to set it up.
It's a whole lot simpler then MS-Widows to install and setup.
--
-----------------------
Don E. Groves, Jr.
my Email is jetnick AT erols DOT com
I'll add a witty saying here later.
Such as:
Give a man a fish and he will eat now.
Teach him to fish and he will ........
...
...
...
...
...
...
... drink beer by to pond all day with his new friends.
================
------------------------------
From: "Jan Johansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: I HATE SAMBA and NT!!!!
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 09:59:44 +0200
Mark Olbert wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Can someone please help me figure out this garbage once and for
>all???? I promise to make zillions of backup copies of smb.conf, once
>I get it working, so that future upgrades won't cause the same problem
><grin>. Seriously, any and all help would be appreciated.
Uhm.. i assume that cal 2.2 ships with samba 2.x.x? Were you using 2.x.x
before? If you were using 1.x.x it uses a default of "user" security, 2.x.x
uses "share".. you will then have to set security = user in your smb.conf
------------------------------
From: SLK230 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: HELP: 3Com 100BaseT/56K card under Linux 6.0
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 00:38:44 -0700
Hello all,
I've been trying to iinstall dual boot Linux 6.0/NT Workstation 4.0 on
my Dell Latitude CPi laptop. The installation went OK, except for my
3COM 100BaseT/56Modem card is not working under Linux....Please
help...Thanks
Vincent Phan
------------------------------
From: "Gavin Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: networked card not found
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 00:55:50 -0700
you are in for some work. I just finnished solving the same problem an hour
ago. isa can't be autoprobed or something like that so you have to tell your
module exactly what to look for.
I ended up adding this to /etc/conf.modules
alias eth0 ne
options ne io=0x240
where ne is the driver module and 0x240 is the base address. I had to
download and compile a tool to find out the right base address.
ftp://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/linux/diag/index.html
read this:
http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/Ethernet-HOWTO.html
for all the gorey details
good luck
Gavin
==========
"Peter Letkeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RedHat does not
> find my ISA network card. Here are the stats for win98
>
> IBM EtherJet Adapter
> Interrupt Request 11
> Input/Output Range 0210-021F
>
> It is plug and play and ISA any help would be nice. Is there any generic
> device drivers that I can use?
>
> Pete
------------------------------
From: "Stephen Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Token Ring network
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 08:31:29 +0100
Hi,
i'm a bit of a newbie on Linux so please bear with me. i have read all
the articles available to me on this newsgroup but cannot find any mention
of setting up a token ring network. Is token ring rarely used in Linux ? My
problem is that we are running a token ring network and i cant get my Linux
box to see any other PC's on the network.
Is there an FAQ out there for setting up a token ring network on Linux ??
TIA,
Ste..
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Stokes)
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: problems with internet in Mandrake
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 08:10:29 GMT
On Tue, 08 Jun 1999 14:03:33 +1000, Jeremy Lunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>But I have problems with the internet in Mandrake now. I can connect to
>some sites with no problems, but others I get no route to host. Some
>sites that I have pinged I don't get packets returned.
How are you accessing the Internet? It sounds unlikely that this is the
fault of your Linux installation. Either your ISP has problems, or...
The Internet can be pretty unreliable. Some hosts simply ignore pings as a
security measure, or they are blocked by firewalls. Routers go down, hosts
go down, and so forth. So do you get the same problems in Windows?
--
Jason Stokes: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: DonJr <donjr@[127.0.0.1]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: Can't connect to my ISP yet, here's the pppd-output...
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 03:58:36 -0400
Melle wrote:
>
> Hi,
> it's me again and the problem is still alive ... I can't connect to my ISP
> running RH5.2.
> But I got the idea of posting the pppd-output, maybe one of you out there
> can do something with it to help me ;-)) It would be great.
>
> Here it is:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------
> Jun 4 19:19:18 PC pppd[456]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
> Jun 4 19:19:18 PC pppd[456]: Using interface ppp0
> Jun 4 19:19:18 PC pppd[456]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS3
> Jun 4 19:19:18 PC pppd[456]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic 0xfba16783>
> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> Jun 4 19:19:21 PC pppd[456]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic 0xfba16783>
> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> Jun 4 19:19:21 PC pppd[456]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x0 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth
> chap 80> <magic 0x7d7f> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> Jun 4 19:19:21 PC pppd[456]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x0 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth
> chap 80> <magic 0x7d7f> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> Jun 4 19:19:21 PC pppd[456]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <magic 0xfba16783>
> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> Jun 4 19:19:44 PC pppd[456]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
> Jun 4 19:19:44 PC pppd[456]: Modem hangup
> Jun 4 19:19:44 PC pppd[456]: Connection terminated.
> Jun 4 19:19:45 PC pppd[456]: Exit.
> Jun 4 19:21:22 PC pppd[464]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
> Jun 4 19:21:22 PC pppd[464]: Using interface ppp0
> Jun 4 19:21:22 PC pppd[464]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS3
> Jun 4 19:21:22 PC pppd[464]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic 0xebee4560>
> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> Jun 4 19:21:25 PC pppd[464]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic 0xebee4560>
> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> Jun 4 19:21:25 PC pppd[464]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x0 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth
> chap 80> <magic 0x2640> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> Jun 4 19:21:25 PC pppd[464]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x0 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth
> chap 80> <magic 0x2640> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> Jun 4 19:21:25 PC pppd[464]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <magic 0xebee4560>
> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> Jun 4 19:21:47 PC pppd[464]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
> Jun 4 19:21:47 PC pppd[464]: Modem hangup
> Jun 4 19:21:47 PC pppd[464]: Connection terminated.
> Jun 4 19:21:48 PC pppd[464]: Exit.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
>
> I know my provider is using CHAP authentification and that I have to add
> username + password to the /etc/ppp/chap-secrets, but using kppp it tells me
> (I have the German version, the English output may differ):
>
> modem ready
> dialing <number>
> network login
>
> Then (after some 30 seconds) it hangs up the modem. But: I DON'T KNOW WHY!!!
> Please help me, thanx.
>
> Melle
Basicaly put "kppp" is not written for the Red Hat Dastro and will not
work without major configuration changes.
The easiest way I've found to setup pppd under RH 5.2 or RH 6.0 is:
# linuxconf { either under X or text mode take you pick}
- Networking
- Client tasks
Select PPP/SLIP/PLIP
Click the ADD button
Make sure PPP is selected
Click the Accept button
Fill in the following fields
Phone Number
Modem Port
Click the use PAP check button if using pap
{ Or try PAP even if the ISP says use CHAP
Because the may support it for there
MS-Windows users. And Not realize that pppd
under Linux can do the same thing.
}
Login Name
Password
Click the Customize button
Select Allow any user (de)activate the interface
Study the other pages
Click the Accept button
Click the quit button on the PPP/SLIP/PLIP page
Select Name server specification (DNS)
Fill in the Name Server Information asked by this page.
Click the Accept button
Click the Quit button
Press enter on the next screen to apply the updates.
Now at the command prompt
$ /sbin/ifup ppp0 will bring up the connection
$ /sbin/ifdown ppp0 will bring down the connection
Under X simplily load the program "usernet" is a simple to use one to
get you started, though there are other choices out there.
RedHat 5.2 and 6.0 versions of the Linux Dastro's are simple enough,
even a MicroS*t user should be able to set it up.
It's a whole lot simpler then MS-Widows to install and setup.
--
-----------------------
Don E. Groves, Jr.
my Email is jetnick AT erols DOT com
I'll add a witty saying here later.
Such as:
Give a man a fish and he will eat now.
Teach him to fish and he will ........
...
...
...
...
...
...
... drink beer by to pond all day with his new friends.
================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ron Olsen)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: can't connect to my isp using kppp
Date: 7 Jun 1999 08:11:27 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don E. Groves, Jr. wrote:
> Basicaly put "kppp" is not written for the Red Hat Dastro and will not
> work without major configuration change.
I'm using kppp to connect to my ISP (MindSpring) on a Red Hat 6.0 system;
it works almost flawlessly. I've also successfully used kppp on Red Hat 5.2.
Make sure you have the latest version of kppp (from kdenetwork-1.1.1)
and ppp version 2.3.7 or 2.3.8, and that you configure kppp appropriately
for your ISP.
--
Ron Olsen
Boulder Colorado
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Luigi Trovato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: RedHat & ISDN
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 09:35:26 +0200
Hi,
I've got a RH 5.2 system controlling an ISDN internal card, which acts as a
proxy for a LAN.
It dials on demand to the ISP and does its job. The system is always turned
on, but ISDN services are shutted down at evening and turned on again at
morning.
The problem is that after 1,5 - 2 days the system hangs because there are
lots of "ipppd" processes and they lead the system to full resource usage.
The script I use seems to be correct and should not launch more than one
ipppd to control the dial on demand service, and it gets killed at
"/etc/rc.d/init.d/isdn stop".
What could cause so many processes to be active and how can I avoid this?
Kernel is 2.0.36 with recent isdn4kernel upgrade. Isdn4linux-utils are
2.1beta.
Any suggestion?
Ciao,
------------------------------
From: "Gavin Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: can't see network card - no driver?
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 00:32:40 -0700
update
I got the ne.o module to load and the card is recognized.
now I can't see the network and vise-versa.
eth0 interface is up, it shows up in the routing table, I can ping it from
the console, and I even manage to get a virtual host running in apache BUT I
can't so much as ping any other machine on the network and they can't ping
me.
route reports:
eth0
inet addr:198.62.0.1 bcast:198.62.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
RX packets:367 error:163 others are 0
TX packets:98
Any ideas?
Thanks
Gavin
==========
> I have a D-Link DE-220pct isa card but the RH installer couldn't identify
> it.. it did not locate the card automatically nor was my card
> on the list. How do I get it going manually?
>
> thanks
> Gavin
------------------------------
From: Stephen Carville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: I HATE SAMBA and NT!!!!
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 01:01:41 -0700
Some possible causes:
1. Do you have a UNIX account on the machine (or NIS) so samba knows how to
set your directory permissions?
2. Are both smbd and nmbd running?
3. Do you have an smbpasswd file? (unless security=server)
Mark Olbert wrote:
>
> Goddamn it, but Samba and NT are a ROYAL pain in the ass to get
> working together!
>
> What particularly irks me is that I >>had<< them working together...
> but then I re-installed Linux (Caldera 2.2). I figured this wouldn't
> be a problem since I "knew" how to get them to work together, right?
> Wrong! I don't understand this stuff as well as I thought I did...
>
> Here's the problem: I can see my Linux box in NT's Network
> Neighborhood, but when I double-click on it, I am asked to supply a
> username and password.
>
> I didn't used to have to do this, when things were working before,
> because I've set up the Linux and NT usernames and passwords to be the
> same.
>
> Ah ha, recalled I, I forgot to turn encrypted passwords on (this bit
> me in the butt last time)! So I set up encrypted passwords, built
> smbpasswd, and... nada. Zilch. Same goddamn dialog box asking me for a
> username and password. And rejecting every username and password I can
> think to put into it!
>
> Can someone please help me figure out this garbage once and for
> all???? I promise to make zillions of backup copies of smb.conf, once
> I get it working, so that future upgrades won't cause the same problem
> <grin>. Seriously, any and all help would be appreciated.
>
> BTW, I've read the man page, the HOWTO, several chapters on Samba in
> various books, ENCRYPTION.txt, etc.
>
> - Mark
--
Stephen Carville
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
====================================================
It's all right to have geniuses build systems for use by idiots, but
the path from laboratory to marketplace needs to go through the
proving ground of prudent engineering.
Peter Coffee
------------------------------
From: "Gavin Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mismached read page pointers
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 01:20:26 -0700
Hi,
I'm trying to get ethernet up.
When I ping it from another box on the network I get this in
/var/log/message:
kernel: eth0: mismached read page pointers 41 vs. 61
kernel: eth0: mismached read page pointers 20 vs. 40
route reports:
eth0
inet addr:198.62.0.1 bcast:198.62.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
RX packets:367 error:163 others are 0
TX packets:98
the card is a dLink de-220p ne2000 compatible ISA
What gives?
Gavin
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.linux.network
Subject: Re: Warning against Announce Communications web hosting
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 09:09:29 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry to here about that. Good hosting companies that provide good
service is hard to find. Lucky I found one. They have been really nice
to me, so I may as well give them a good plug. Check out
FutureQuest.net. Look at the Community Forums. You will notice that
the owners and administrators visit everyday and answer questions.
Fair price, good options, and the best support out there.
P.S. If you register a domain with them, you will be listed as the
Admin Contact in Internic. You will never have the problem as you did
with Allen.
Eddie
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999 12:26:07, agner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since Allen Hoffman of Announce Communications has announced his web
> hosting business here I feel it is appropriate to warn you about my bad
> experiences with this business.
>
> The business is cheap, but service is extremely poor. Severe errors are
> only fixed after many complaints, and less severe errors are never fixed
> at all. Most E-mails are never answered. But worst of all: if you are
> dissatisfied and want to move to another service provider, you may not
> be able to transfer your domain name.
>
> My story is:
> I have bought a domain web site at Announce Communications. In april my
> site went down because mr Hoffman failed to pay the Internic bill. All
> my complaints remained unanswered. After a month I decided that I had to
> move my domain to another ISP. Only after he learned that I was moving
> the domain did I hear from mr Hoffman. Do you think it was an apology?
> Or an offer to refund what I had paid for a faulty service? No - you
> can't guess it. It was a demand that I pay him 70$ for releasing my
> domain! My question is now: is it possible to move the domain without
> his permission? The internic record has my name as registrant, and his
> name as administrative contact.
------------------------------
From: Robert Kiendl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: browsing samba 2.0 from NT
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 10:47:53 +0200
hi!
with Samba 1.9 and Suse5.2 everything was fine.
switching to Samba 2.0 and Suse 6.1 we cannot see the linux
samba server anymore in the network browser list from NT and
win95 machines.
though we can connect to samba by directy establishing a
connection (through a drive letter thereby specifying user
and password)
we can also find samba with "Find Computer" and then browse
the samba server for a while, but only if at least one connection
by a drive letter is established before.
when the explorer refreshes display the samba server again disapears.
i think the problem has something to do with the nobody guest
account, which is obviously used in the browsing stage. but i
see "nobody" in passwd and it seems to be the same as with
samba 1.9 / suse 5.2.
i'd be glad if anybody could help
robert
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NIC Cards needed badly
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 05:14:28 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello could someone tell me where I can get NIC Cards for RedHat 5.2??
I have read the http://www.redhat.com/hardware page.
No luck in finding one of the supported NICs though.
If someone could point me to a page that has supported NICs I would be
very very thankful.
Thanks In Advance.
Vince
------------------------------
From: Vincent Ridderikhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: useradd problem under SuSe 6.1
Date: 7 Jun 1999 10:03:48 GMT
Hi,
I have a small problem with useradd under SuSe. When I add users the
password isn't encrypted, so when a user tries to login it can't because
the password isn't encrypted in the shadow file, when I use YaST to add
users it is encrypted, but I need to add a lot of users a day and don't
feel much about creating them by hand, so I've written a perl script
which does it for me, the only problem is that useradd doesn't encrypt
the passwords. At first I thought it was because I added users using the
Perl script, but when I use the cmdline I also have the same problem.
Can anyone help me with this?
Greetz Vincent...
:-))
------------------------------
From: "Martin Button" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Sendmail relaying from other IP networks
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 10:30:31 +0100
Could someone give me advice on the following:
We have several connected networks on different IP addresses, but when mail
is sent from machines with IP addresses not on the same subnet as the
sendmail host, we get a "551 ... we do not relay" It occurs every time
non-local email is send (ie. relayed thought the server.)
How do I get sendmail to trust the other IP networks? Do I need to add a
sendmail feature?
We are running RedHat V5.2 with Sendmail 8.8.7
Marty.
KC3.
------------------------------
From: "Jan Johansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sendmail relaying from other IP networks
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 11:42:42 +0200
>We have several connected networks on different IP addresses, but when mail
>is sent from machines with IP addresses not on the same subnet as the
>sendmail host, we get a "551 ... we do not relay" It occurs every time
>non-local email is send (ie. relayed thought the server.)
>
>How do I get sendmail to trust the other IP networks? Do I need to add a
>sendmail feature?
Took me less then five seconds to find the answer in the FAQ. Ever read it?
http://www.sendmail.org/faq/section3.html#3.27
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
