Linux-Networking Digest #487, Volume #11 Thu, 10 Jun 99 21:13:53 EDT
Contents:
Re: Linux can't be a big role...???!!! (Jeremiah)
Re: Dns Problem (Benjamin John)
Re: Linux can't be a big role...???!!! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux-router question - connecting pc to T1 (Benjamin John)
Re: Linux can't be a big role...???!!! (Jeremiah)
Re: Linux can't be a big role...???!!! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Here's My Networking Problems (Arthur R Peale)
data-link sniffing for enet, ppp, isdn, hdlc, etc. (joeslugg)
Re: samba in as root? (Charles Wilkins)
Re: Linux can't be a big role...???!!! (Shice Beoney)
Re: where the heck ARE the linux drivers @? (Mike Ching)
Re: Delaying eth1 Initialization (Sitaram Chamarty)
Re: Delay when accepting telnet/ftp connections (Sitaram Chamarty)
Re: IP Masquerading and NT's Default Gateway Problem (Sitaram Chamarty)
Re: script for dynamically updating resolv.conf? (Sitaram Chamarty)
Re: Here's My Networking Problems (Sitaram Chamarty)
Free Sex Links 8374 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: linux RH 6.0 +Earthlink dialup troubles (Rain)
poor masquerading performance for games ("Wade Olsen")
Re: linux <--> win98 via network (JuanValdez)
Re: Linux & Cybercafe (David Knight)
Re: Masquerading ("Jan Johansson")
Re: DHCP server. Need help getting it to work. (MT Byers)
Dns Problem ("bv")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeremiah)
Subject: Re: Linux can't be a big role...???!!!
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 23:04:43 GMT
In article <7jpf07$l68$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thusly:
>
>> I agree, but it serves my purposes. Besides, why would a home
>>user need a "professional app"?
>
> I'm a home user, but I still have major tax issues. A home user with
> a lot of money, assets, investments, needs good personal finance software.
A home user with a lot of money, assets, investments needs a
good tax preparer/consultant/lawyer. Learning the ins'n'outs of the
tax code takes even longer (for the average person) than learning the
ins'n'outs of Linux.
BTW, I agree that Xinvest isn't good enough... if there'd
been some development in the last year and a half, it could've developed
into something worthwhile... still, it serves my purposes (keeping track
of accounts and especially asset allocation) better than Microsoft Money
or Quicken Basic.
Brian
--
email to bmeloon1 at twcny dot rr dot com. evilquaker is a spam collector.
------------------------------
From: Benjamin John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Dns Problem
Date: 10 Jun 1999 15:45:29 PDT
where did u get this 195.195.195.195 address ? hope youre not planning on going
to the internet with that, because its a read address.
in win98 add the machine names and their ip address to /windows/hosts
in linux in your /etc/hosts file
bv wrote:
> I have two computers. One with linux and one with win98. The dns is not
> working. If i type in linux: ping 195.195.195.195 it works correct, but if i
> type ping MB (195.195.195.195) it says: unknow host. The same with pinging
> my linux box under win98.
> How can i fix this?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Linux can't be a big role...???!!!
Date: 10 Jun 1999 17:42:15 -0500
Reply-To: "J.L.M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In article <P3K73.1416$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jeremiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yuki Taga) spake thusly:
> I agree, but it serves my purposes. Besides, why would a home
>user need a "professional app"?
I'm a home user, but I still have major tax issues. A home user with
a lot of money, assets, investments, needs good personal finance software.
Anything short of Rock-Solid is not good enough when the risks are high.
--
James
http://ssdd.conservatory.com
------------------------------
From: Benjamin John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux-router question - connecting pc to T1
Date: 10 Jun 1999 15:47:42 PDT
see if http://linuxrouter.org helps
Tim Kelley wrote:
> Currently I have a linux box, acting as a firewall and running squid
> for proxy sitting between my network and a Cisco 1600 which in turn is
> connected to a T1.
>
> I was curious as to who makes hardware which will enable me to connect
> the linux firewall directly to the T1?
>
> Would I see any performance gains?
------------------------------
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeremiah)
Subject: Re: Linux can't be a big role...???!!!
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 09:12:16 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yuki Taga) spake thusly:
>
>>> Anyone with just very basic skills and not any in-depth technical
>>> knowledge can install and configure Windows with just a little trial
>>> and error, maybe.
>>
>> Yeah, right. Dream on.
>
> I'm afraid you're the one who is dreaming. It happens thousands if
> not tens of thousands of times daily around this planet.
Hmmm... I wonder how many of those are forced re-installs
from Windows gutting itself? (BTW, at this stage, these users have
probably progressed beyond "very basic skills" and "not any in-depth
technical knowledge")
> How do you
> think they got 250-300 million units (conservative estimate) installed?
> Consultants? Tech support? Don't make me giggle.
Ummm... Let me think... umm... could it be... OEMs selling
computers with Windows pre-installed?
Brian
--
email to bmeloon1 at twcny dot rr dot com. evilquaker is a spam collector.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Linux can't be a big role...???!!!
Date: 10 Jun 1999 17:40:06 -0500
Reply-To: "J.L.M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Yuki Taga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, 10 Jun 1999 03:50:26 GMT, in article
><6CG73.1408$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>(Jeremiah) wrote:
>Actually, it's almost good enough for professionals. It's getting to be a very
>good program. But . . . and this again is a big Linux problem . . . the group
>that developed it has largely finished. Now other people are taking up the
>reigns. Who knows the direction? The speed? No one, that's who. And that's
>the problem. Professionals can't accept that.
They accept it from the corporate world, because it happens in meeting rooms
(at somebody elses company) instead of in the public forum (where they themselves
are involved).
You have insulted my professionalism with your statement, and I do not appreciate that.
--
James
http://ssdd.conservatory.com
------------------------------
From: Arthur R Peale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,alt.linux,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: Here's My Networking Problems
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 19:24:26 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You might want to let us know the IP you use, to ensure you use the same
> Subnet, also, are you using a Hub, straight cable !?
I'm using 10.10.10.1 and 10.10.10.2 as IP's. I'm using BNC Coax as
cable.
Works Linux-to-Linux, not Windows to Linux.
> Have an ice day :)
You too!
--
____________________________________________
Northeast USA Computer Show Schedule
Computer Shows All Over The Northeast!
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.vermontel.com/~vengnce/shows/
____________________________________________
------------------------------
From: joeslugg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: data-link sniffing for enet, ppp, isdn, hdlc, etc.
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 21:02:28 GMT
I do QA for a network vendor, and I like to use Linux whenever possible
in my test lab.
I'm trying to get a method of sniffing packets off of ethernet, ppp,
isdn, hdlc, etc.
Before you hit that reply button, I'm already aware of libpcap, tcpdump,
and all the cool decode viewers that are based on them (ethereal,
karpski, and the gazillion others).
The problem I have is that I need full view of all the Data-link packet
headers. So for ethernet, that means MAC addresses, ether-type (etc.),
and for PPP that means a 0x7E flag, a 0xFF addr, a 0x03 ctrl, and then
a 2-byte protocol field before finally hitting the Layer-3 protocol
header. I need to see all that stuff that most people aren't aware
of. And I need it for ethernet, ppp, ISDN, HDLC, whatever I can get.
If any linux net gurus know of how I can get this capability, I'd sure
appreciate hearing about it. I'm a medium-level coder too, so if
there's something simple in libpcap (for instance) that I missed, and
you want to bring to my attention, I won't come back with, "Huh?".
I don't have consistent netnews access, so please remove NOSPAM. from
the following mail address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and send replies there.
Much thanks to all,
Joe
--
Error: signature deleted
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Charles Wilkins)
Subject: Re: samba in as root?
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 11:53:12 GMT
On Wed, 02 Jun 1999 23:25:15 GMT, "Adam C. Emerson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[ Followup-To set to comp.os.linux.networking ]
>
>In comp.os.linux.misc Charles Wilkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[ Reformatted for width ]
>
>> Is there any way connect to the linux box using the samba service as
>> root?
>> Currently, I am connecting with my user account, but I did not want to
>> extend root priveleges to this account.
>
>> While we are on the topic, is there a way to FTP in as root.
>
>> I am aware of the security risks, but I still would like to know how.
>
>These are DPU things to do, but. . .
>
>Remove root from the invalid users field in /etc/smb.conf
>and remove root from /etc/ftpusers (paradoxical, no?)
I did not try the ftp suggestion yet, but samba does have a global
setting for doing this.
# /etc/smb.conf
[global]
admin users = username
Charles Wilkins CNE / MCP / A+
Network Design Consultant
Practical Computer Solutions
http://www.pcscs.com
609-321-1530
609-321-0840 - fax
--
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shice Beoney)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Linux can't be a big role...???!!!
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 23:24:22 GMT
On Thu, 10 Jun 1999 22:29:36 GMT in comp.os.linux.setup,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yuki Taga) uttered the following profound gem of
wisdom:
>On Thu, 10 Jun 1999 14:41:14 -0400, in article
><Pine.OSF.4.05.9906101422150.722-100000@banyan>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I use StarOffice. It's got a decent spreadsheet program.
>
>Yeah. <grin> But let's face it, that interface and suite have a waaaaays to
>go to catch Office. <vbg> But for free <!> it's fantastic.
I've never been very impressed with office... When in Windows, I still
use MS Works 2.0a, it's gotta be a good 4-5 years old now and it's
still 16-bit, but it's fast and simple. For instance, if you want the
name of a field to still be viewable when you scroll down, just name
the field. I haven't found any way yet to do that in Excel, other than
putting the title in the first cell, then splitting the screen. And if
there is, then it's buried somewhere behind the Office philosophy of
trying to be everything to everyone. Is Outlook express a better
program than Eudora Light/Free Agent because it does both tasks in a
single program? No, because rather than concentrate on one and do a
good job of it, they ended up doing a bad (IMO) job of each. Try
reading an e-mail from an OH user in Pine.
>>The manager over there, my mother, is actually begging for Linux because
>>she pines for a command line interface. Windows is too confusing for her.
>
>With all due respect to your mother . . . she knows not what she pines for.
><g> If she thinks Windows is confusing, she's going to be **lost** in Linux.
>*This* is the best one I've heard in a while. (I'm sure your mother is a very
>nice and very intelligent person, BTW.)
GUI's are good. GUI's are useful. GUI's are helpful. But that doesn't
lessen the usefulness of command lines. Try automating a function in
DOS, like say writing a batch file to clean out your netscape cache.
Then try automating the same thing in Windows. Another example, try
changing the extension of a large group of files in KDE. As far as
GUIs have come in this decade, there's still things that CLI (Command
Line Interfaces) do better.
--
"Windows has detected the presence of a more efficient, faster,
and more reliable Operating System installed on your system.
Do you wish to delete it?
Yes Yes"
-What M$ would LIKE to do about Linux
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Ching)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.help,linux.help
Subject: Re: where the heck ARE the linux drivers @?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 23:19:38 GMT
If the card is an Allied Telesis AT1500, you can use the LANCE driver. I
didn't recognize the ati1500 reference but if it has DMA, maybe you mistyped
the name.
On Thu, 10 Jun 1999 13:13:08 GMT, Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Monte Phillips) wrote:
>
>>If those cards are PnP cards you're gonna have to use a setup prog and
>>turn the PnP off before Linux will see it.
>
>been there done that! - pnp was disabled, io,irq,dma manually set
>to know good #'s; card passes diagnostics with these parameters...
>
>________________________________________________
>Definition of Windows 95:
>
>A 32 bit upgrade to 16 bit extensions for an 8 bit operating system
>designed to run on a 4 bit processor by a 2 bit company that
>doesn't like 1 bit of competition.
>
>
>>
>>>tried 'em!
>>>
>>>tried SEVERAL that i thought were generic....
>>>
>>>>> (i need ati1500 nic drivers) - the howto specifically says, that linux
>>>>> IS compatible with my card, I just can't find any way to get the 2 to
>>>>> talk! - (tried the 1700 drivers which come with my mandrake 6 dist -
>>>>> no good)
>>>>> bg@@interaccess.com
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sitaram Chamarty)
Subject: Re: Delaying eth1 Initialization
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 10:42:20 GMT
On Wed, 09 Jun 1999 06:20:48 GMT, Drake Christensen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In article <7jknre$l3s$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
>> Here are two pages that address this issue:
>>
>> http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/Ethernet-HOWTO-3.html#ss3.2
>>
>> http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/misc/multicard.html
>Thanks. I've seen both of those HOWTOs.
>
>It just occurred to me that I should have included the relevant lines
>from my conf.modules file:
>
>alias eth0 ne
>alias eth1 ne
>options eth0 io=0x280 irq=10
>options eth1 io=0x300 irq=15
I'm not sure if you read them right, had some other problem, and
changed to the lines above. According to the second howto
decsribed above, you should use something like:
alias eth0 ne
alias eth1 ne
options ne io=0x280,0x300
Now, if you must have 2 IRQs (I strongly suggest trying as above
first!), then you can go to your method. In that case, perhaps
you have a problem with the IRQ...?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sitaram Chamarty)
Subject: Re: Delay when accepting telnet/ftp connections
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 10:42:22 GMT
On Tue, 08 Jun 1999 15:41:53 +0200, Jeroen Verhoeven
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You'll have to make sure that your DNS is set up correctly. Just put al your
>machines in the /etc/hosts file and make sure named looks in there first before
>refering to bind.
named *is* bind, in a manner of speaking. You mean "make sure the
resolver looks in there first...".
To the original poster: this is done by ensuring that
/etc/nsswitch.conf contains the line
hosts: files nisplus nis dns
or
hosts: files dns
the word "files" must come first - before dns or the others, if
any.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sitaram Chamarty)
Subject: Re: IP Masquerading and NT's Default Gateway Problem
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 10:42:25 GMT
On Tue, 8 Jun 1999 14:55:00 -0500, Don B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have NT client computers on a LAN accessing a remote network though a
>Cisco router. Each of the NT machines has the default gateway set to the IP
>of the Cisco router.
>
>The problem is, when I add the IP of a Linux (Redhat 6.0) server running IP
>Masquerading to the internet in the "TCP/IP Properties" "Advanced" settings
>for the NT machine I loose access to the remote network. If I put the Cisco
>IP first I loose the internet and if I put the Linux IP first I loose the
>remote network.
>
>Any ideas on how to get the two to work together?
"defaultroute" is like the highlander - there can be only one.
Decide which of your two gateways (cisco router, linux with
IPMasq) is the more "general" route and use that as your defult
gateway. Then add specific routes (not "default" using the other
gateway.
Or - as another poster said, give them all the cisco as the
default route and have the cisco point to linux for "default".
This will, as he said, add 1 hop for internet, but if the number
of clients are large, its easier to admin.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sitaram Chamarty)
Subject: Re: script for dynamically updating resolv.conf?
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 10:42:28 GMT
On Wed, 09 Jun 1999 07:50:55 GMT, Tom Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi!
>I want to connect my Linux to two different ISPs (oh, and maybe a local
>caching ns later...). I want to do this: running a script that magically
>puts a soft link from the provider specific /etc/resolv.conf to the
>'real' one.
>Should not be too hard but since I am lazy I wanna now if there already
>is something like this out there. And no, I don't want to use kppp,
>ezppp etc.
What's wrong with putting one inside "ip-up"? To figure out which
one to put in, you could try something like this:
cp resolv.conf.for.192.provider /etc/resolv.conf
/sbin/ifconfig | grep 209.64 &&
cp resolv.conf.for.209.provider /etc/resolv.conf
Other, more complex methods exist. This should work very well,
however.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sitaram Chamarty)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,alt.linux,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: Here's My Networking Problems
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 10:42:26 GMT
On Tue, 08 Jun 1999 22:26:30 -0400, Arthur R Peale
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Could someone let me know, step by step what to do, so I can go over
>something I may have missed?
It's easier the other way around ;-)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Free Sex Links 8374
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 11:48:40 GMT
For Nasty Sex links visit:
http://website.lineone.net/~simonsi/sexlinks.htm
yqlhgmbmzeierhvzhmmpyelulzkuwhyeyukj
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rain)
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.help,linux.redhat.misc,earthlink.tech-support.other_dialup_software,earthlink.Unix-Hangout
Subject: Re: linux RH 6.0 +Earthlink dialup troubles
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 16:14:36 -0700
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Trevor Smithson) wrote:
>I can step through the login process in Windows where I manually
>input my username and password, and everything works fine.
>DUN indicates that is is using CHAP as an auth. protocol.
>Do I need to setup linux to do this?
EarthLink uses PAP (Password Authentication Protocol), not CHAP
(Challenge-Handshake Authentication Protocol)... you will need to set this
up on your linux box... check out
<http://www.linux-howto.com/LDP/HOWTO/PPP-HOWTO.html> as a starting point.
(linux-howto.com is your friend... bookmark it) ;)
HTH,
Rain
--
The opinions expressed in this post are my own and in no way express nor imply
the opinions or policies of my employer.
------------------------------
From: "Wade Olsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: poor masquerading performance for games
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 16:12:05 -0700
I've been playing starcraft over the internet. I have it set up like this: I
run two machines on my LAN with W95 as games machines and the I have a linux
machine as the gateway/masquerading proxy to the internet via a DSL
connection. What appears to happen is the linux gateway seems to be
buffering up too much data for one of the machines (the slower one).
Is there anything I can look at (e.g. netstat) that can verify this
assertion?
Are there performance/latency parameters I can tune to affect this?
Thanks,
Wade
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (JuanValdez)
Subject: Re: linux <--> win98 via network
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 12:46:09 GMT
Absolutely correct. Rename host.sam to simply hosts
On Thu, 10 Jun 1999 08:57:51 +0200, Martin
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Wahlstr=F6m?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The hosts file on windows should be 'hosts'.
>'hosts.sam' is a sample file, not used!
>
>If you can ping them by IP number, You are on the right track.
>
> Martin/
>
>Andrew King wrote:
>>
>> I realize this may have been answered many times before, so please
>> forgive any possible redundancy. I'm trying to get my Linux box and a
>> Win98 laptop to ping one another on a network via a 10/100 ethernet hub,
>> yet all my config attempts have been exhausted to no avail. Can any of
>> you who have done this before provide me with the details?
>>
>> Here's a brief synopsis:
>>
>> RH Linux 5.1:
>> eth0: 192.168.2.1 configured and active
>>
>> /etc/hosts:
>> 127.0.0.1 loopback
>> 192.168.2.1 linux-1
>> 192.168.2.2 win98-1
>>
>> executed: route add default gw 192.168.2.1 eth0
>>
>> Win98 (laptop):
>> NIC: 192.168.2.2 configured and active
>>
>> /windows/hosts.sam
>> {same as above}
>>
>> TCP/IP properties for NIC set as follows:
>> IP address: 192.168.2.2
>> gateway: 192.168.2.1
>>
>> Both systems are connected via CAT V twisted pair to a 10 MB/sec hub,
>> yet neither can ping the other, but each can ping itself (via loopback,
>> of course). Thanks in advance -
>>
>> Andy
------------------------------
From: David Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Linux & Cybercafe
Date: 10 Jun 1999 02:50:19 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David T. Blake) writes:
> David Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> You can configure the windowmanager without any xterm. So the users are
> >> not able to start any other program. On the desktop you offer only the
> >> browser. Login should be via xdm !
> >> That's it i think !
> >telnet://localhost
> >
> >and it will open an xterm running the telnet session, from which they
> >would then be able to start other programs.
>
> And why is inetd serving telnet on this machine ??
good question :-)
But it was just an example, the program to handle telnet could be set to be
any program by editing netscapes preferences, so an xterm could be started up
on its own, or any other program that the users knows the path and has the
correct permissions for on the system.
David
--
The superior man understands what is right;
the inferior man understands what will sell.
-- Confucius
------------------------------
From: "Jan Johansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Masquerading
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 15:17:58 +0200
>Is it possible to to deny certain protocols with IP masquerading. Eg, I'd
>like to be able to telnet and ftp through the gateway, but the gateway
>should be used as http proxy.
With ipchains from the 2.2.x kernels, this is very easy. Go to
www.rustcorp.com and read the faq/howto.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MT Byers)
Subject: Re: DHCP server. Need help getting it to work.
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 00:46:53 GMT
On Wed, 9 Jun 1999 21:53:00 -0700, "Alan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I'm running Red Hat Linux 5.0 (kernel 2.2.9) on a dual Pentium 233 w 128mb
>ram. Contains two 3Com 3c905 nics. One nic (eth0) is going to my cable
>modem. The other (eth1) is going to my internal network.
>
>I downloaded and installed the latest version of ISC's DHCP server. I'm
>trying to get it to listen on eth1 (the nic going to my internal network)
>and assign the range of 192.168.0.100 to 192.168.0.200.
>
>It repeatedly gets two erros which look exactly like this:
>
>socket: Invalid Argument
>Make sure to set CONFIG_PACKET=y and CONFIG_FILTER=y in your kernel
>configuration!
Could you give a brief description of the network you're serving
numbers to? That would help.
But for now, it sounds like you're trying to get your server to listen
on a port it doesn't want to listen on. Hard to tell from here,
though.
Hope so!
------------------------------
From: "bv" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Dns Problem
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 15:34:42 +0200
I have two computers. One with linux and one with win98. The dns is not
working. If i type in linux: ping 195.195.195.195 it works correct, but if i
type ping MB (195.195.195.195) it says: unknow host. The same with pinging
my linux box under win98.
How can i fix this?
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
