Linux-Networking Digest #491, Volume #11         Fri, 11 Jun 99 03:13:43 EDT

Contents:
  Re: dhcp server config options with ip masq ("Erik Graversen")
  Re: diald problem (Gilford Wimbley)
  Re: Samba: Only one Win95...Net Neighborhood: Update ("Carl D. Blake")
  PAP, CHAP and all that Jazz (Dhiraj Kacker)
  Re: setting up a webserver ("Andrey Smirnov")
  Re: linux RH 6.0 +Earthlink dialup troubles (Earthlink News Support)
  Re: PPP working as root, but.... (araqnid)
  Re: using two modems in ppp server (Gyepi Sam)
  Re: Time corrupted using Samba (Thomann KH)
  Re: Samba and win98 problems (Frank)
  Can't Figure Out Base Address for Gateway Etherent Card ("Hoyt")

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Erik Graversen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: dhcp server config options with ip masq
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 05:41:50 GMT


jm wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Dhcp server was working fine until second network card was installed.
>Now it gives error no subnet declared for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx which is in
>the range of the second card.  I only want dhcp to hand out addresses
>on the subnet for the first card however.  If I make a subnet
>declaration for the second card it doesn't give the error anymore, but
>it is trying to listen for clients on that interface now.....
>
>What do I need to do to correct this????
>


Assuming the first card is eth0 here is what we have in /etc/rc.local

# this route is needed for microsoft OS (win95) that violate
# the dhc protocol
route add -host 255.255.255.255 dev eth0
# serve only on LAN interface:
/usr/sbin/dhcpd  eth0 &

the other interface (eth1) is connected to the internet.

>Thanks for your help,
>
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gilford Wimbley)
Subject: Re: diald problem
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 06:09:42 GMT

On Thu, 10 Jun 1999 11:25:47 +0000, Ilan Finci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>--------------D05369A87ADC917B48C27A10
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>Hi,
>We have a small netwark of 2 computers (ethernet between them) that
>connect to the out side world using a modem installed in one of them
>(A).  the second computer (B) has its default gateway set to be the
>first computer (A) and I have setup ppp on A and everything is working.
>The problem is that currently each user that want to connect out has to
>check if someone is already connected and then, if not, he has to login
>as root to computer A and initiate the ppp connection.
>
>To solve this problem I'm trying to set up diald. I read the HOWTO and
>the man page, and got it set almost completely.
>
>When someone on A tries to connect - the diald activates the ppp and I
>get connected and everything is fine. I can use the Internet from both
>machines.
>
>If someone on B tries to connect (when the connection is down) then the
>diald starts the ppp (as should be) and the compures get connected (I
>see the ppp0 connection). From computer A everything works fine, but
>from computer B I cannot use domain names, only IP adresses. It seems
>that only in this  situation I cannot connect to the DNS (which is
>external).  The DNS connection works fine for computer A, and for
>computer B when I use regulat ppp of computer A inisiated the
>connection).
>
>
>Can anyone please point me in the direction of the problem please?
>
>I'm using RH 6.0 and kernel 2.2.5-15.
>
>
>Thanks in advance,
>Ilan Finci
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>--------------D05369A87ADC917B48C27A10
>Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
> name="ifinci.vcf"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Content-Description: Card for Ilan Finci
>Content-Disposition: attachment;
> filename="ifinci.vcf"
>
>begin:vcard 
>n:Finci;Ilan
>tel;fax:+972-2-5867720
>tel;work:+972-2-5866989
>x-mozilla-html:TRUE
>org:MobilEye Vision Technologies LTD.
>adr:;;24 Mishol Hadkalim ;Jerusalem;;97427;Israel
>version:2.1
>email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>x-mozilla-cpt:;5216
>fn:Ilan Finci
>end:vcard
>
>--------------D05369A87ADC917B48C27A10--
>
Wow, this sounds really screwy.  The only thing I can think of is that
when diald invokes pppd, there is some key option that is missing.  So
examine how you are invoking pppd when it *does* work, and see if
there is any difference between that and how diald is invoking it.
One thing that comes to mind is defaultroute.  Good luck.

GW


------------------------------

From: "Carl D. Blake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba: Only one Win95...Net Neighborhood: Update
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 15:42:11 GMT

Its possible that computer A has AutoLogon set in the registry.  This is the
behavior I've seen when a computer on a network doesn't prompt for a
username and password on startup.  Run regedit on computer A and do a search
for AutoLogon (I think that's right - it might be AutoLogin or Auto Logon
with a space).  If you find it just delete the key.  That should fix your
problem.  I've seen this a few times and doing this fixed it every time.

I just checked microsoft's web site.  The article that talks about this
problem is Q141858.  The registry entry is:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\
Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Network\Real Mode Net\AutoLogon

Just delete the AutoLogon entry.

Read http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q141/8/58.asp

mikes wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>OK Folks, here's a little update, but first, many "Thanks" to all of you
for
>your helpful suggestions. :)
>
>Greg, what you suggested works well. I have a little inconsistancy though,
>and wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that computer A has
>internet access presently (still working on my firewall) and thus more
>protocols, etc. than computer B.
>
>Here's what happens when I restart both computers:
>Computer A doesnt prompt for a password for Windows login.
>Computer A does prompt for a Samba password, but doesnt remember it, even
>when saving is checked.
>
>Computer B does prompt for a password for Windows login, and wont let me
see
>the SMB server until I login properly.
>Computer B doesn't prompt for a Samba password, and lets me access the SMB
>server without hesitation.
>
>I have deleted my .pwl files on both machines, and rebuilt new .pwl files,
>but still get the same results.
>
>Both computers now show Computer A, Computer B, and the SMB Server in the
>Network Neighborhood. And when I open the Server from Computer A or B, I
see
>only their respective directories on the server, and nothing else (good). I
>have yet to make a shared directory on the SMB server, but the simple
things
>first. Also, note that computers A and B both have a single folder on their
>drives that are shared, but no permissions have been given to any users.
>This is a "leftover" from my Windows Net Neighborhood prior to my Linux
>server (I had simple sharing only then).
>
>My guess is that Computer B is correctly logging in, even though both
>Network Neighborhoods are configured the same, except for the differences
>found in Computer A (Computer A is configured for Internet login to local
>ISP).
>
>Again, thanks in advance, any further help appreciated...
>
>Mike
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Greg Wildman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.networking
>Date: Wednesday, June 09, 1999 8:33 AM
>Subject: Re: Samba: Only one Win95 machine can access Net Neighborhood
>
>>On the Windoze machines, right-click Network Neighboorhood and select
>>Properties.  Choose 'Windows Logon' for Primary Network Connection. Double
>>click the 'Client for Microsoft Networks'  component and make sure you
have
>not
>>set it to log onto a NT domain. (I assume you don't want to do this.)
>>
>>Click the Identification tab at the top and make sure that your workgroup
>name
>>is the same for all 3 machines.
>>You might also want to set up samba on the server to be the master
browser.
>>
>>Hope this helps,
>>Greg.
>
>
>
>



------------------------------

From: Dhiraj Kacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PAP, CHAP and all that Jazz
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 10:48:02 -0500

Yallo!

This email should  probably elicit and "go and look here response".

I use PRODIGY to connect and have been using "netcfg" under RedHat 5.0.
As I understand (and I damn well can be wrong), "netcfg" connects using
PAP.
I have a laptop and on the road I was unable to connect to prodigy -  in

Boston and in Boise (Idaho). However, I did manage to connect both times

through windows - I checked the details of the connections and the
connection
was created using CHAP.

My questions is, is there a good LINUX script out there which will
autodetect the
connection protocol so that I don't have to worry about not being able
to ALWAYS run linux. Ideally, I'd just have to change the phone number
and
id/password in the script and I should be able to connect to just about
ANY
ISP. Other enlightening suggestions are also welcome.

Linux networking studs, please help.

Thanks in advance.

-Dhiraj Kacker
(remove nospam from reply address)




------------------------------

From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: setting up a webserver
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 22:59:52 -0700

It all depends on the content of the server (a lot of graphic content needs
a lot of bandwidth, etc.).

Also I would suggest looking at DSL vs ISDN. ISDN is just way to expensive!

Good luck!

Mathew Threadgill wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I have a question about setting up a webserver.  I am being hired to
>setup a web server that will not be getting much traffic.  What I want
>to know is if a dual channel ISDN line will be enough bandwidth for this
>server?
>



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Earthlink News Support)
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.linux.help,linux.redhat.misc,earthlink.tech-support.other_dialup_software,earthlink.Unix-Hangout
Subject: Re: linux RH 6.0 +Earthlink dialup troubles
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 05:44:39 GMT

Trevor,

The following steps will allow you to connect to Earthlink with Red
Hat Linux  (X Windows):

1. Start your X session by typing startx at your shell prompt. 
2. Click somewhere in the root window and open the Red Hat Control
Panel from the pop-up menu. Or, open an xterm and type control-panel &
(type the "&" symbol) then press enter. 
3. Open the Modem icon in the Control Panel window. 
4. Select your modem's device location (cua0=COM1; cua1=COM2;
cua2=COM3; cua3=COM4) 
5. Click OK to save your settings. 
6. Open the Network icon. 
7. Click the Name button and enter the following: 

Domain: earthlink.net 
Name Server: 207.217.126.81 (if you can enter a second DNS address,
enter 207.217.77.82) 

8. Click the Interface button, then click Add. Select PPP and click OK
(you're adding ppp0). 
9. Enter the following information: 

User: ELN/your_username 
Password: your_password 

10. Highlight ppp0 and click Edit, then set your modem speed: 

14.4k modem: 38400bps 
28.8k modem: 57600bps 
33.6k modem: 57600bps 
56k modem: 115200bps 

Communications: 

Init: AT&F or AT&F1 if you do not know the proper initialization
string for your modem. 
Phone Number: enter your local EarthLink access number 
Select Modem: select your installed modem 
Click the Network button in the Control Panel. 
MTU: 576 (you can experiment with MTU=1500, also). 

11. Click the Interface tab. 

To connect, highlight ppp0 and click Activate. To disconnect, click
De-Activate.

To check your connection, open an xterm and type tail -f
/var/log/messages 
Check that you have been assigned an IP address and that no error
messages are reported.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Thu, 10 Jun 1999 17:05:06 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trevor
Smithson) wrote:

>Hi everyone,
>
>I've been trying for the last couple of days to get my new RedHat
>installation (6.0) to dial in to Earthlink.  So far, no success.
>Everything is ok with Windows + Earthlink, so I'm sure the problem 
>is a setting somewhere that I just haven't found.  I'm a linux newbie
>so please cut me a little slack!
>
>So far I've just tried to use the linuxconf utility to set everything
>up.  I have the domain name and primary and secondary DNS
>servers defined.  I changed the default modem init string to the
>same one that Win 95 uses.  I have hardware flow control 
>activated, line speed set to 57,600, no PPP options, and the 
>modem port is set to /dev/modem. 
>
>The modem dials out ok and makes a connection, or at least it 
>attempts to make a connection.  I think the most likely source
>of the problem is in the chat setup I have, which is:
>
>expect:  login:
>
>send:  username
>
>expect:  Password:
>
>send:  password
>
>I can step through the login process in Windows where I manually
>input my username and password, and everything works fine.
>DUN indicates that is is using CHAP as an auth. protocol.
>Do I need to setup linux to do this?
>
>I'm kind of at a loss as to what to do next.  I'd be glad to dig out
>any logs or scipts that anybody thinks should be checked.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Trevor Smithson
>
>
>
>

News Support ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

EarthLink Network, Inc.

Useful Information:

 EarthLink Home:        http://www.earthlink.net/
 EarthLink Help Page:   http://help.earthlink.net/
 The EarthLink FAQ:     http://www.earthlink.net/internet/faq/
 Tech Support Request:  http://help.earthlink.net/techsupport/request_form/support.html

24-hour support is available by phone at (800) 395-8410.


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (araqnid)
Subject: Re: PPP working as root, but....
Date: 11 Jun 1999 02:55:05 +0100


In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Paul Mc Kenna  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Following Bill Unruh's very help instructions, I have PPP working as
>root. I would now like to extend this to other users. I have read the
>sections in PPP HOWTO and am aware of some of the  issues involved. I
>have tried a couple of different scripts with various permissions but
>have not successfully started a connection as other than root. 

I think if you want to run ppp as a non-root user, you really want to use
"call" which is designed for just this.

>From Debian, /usr/bin/pon is:

#!/bin/sh
/usr/sbin/pppd call ${1:-provider}

/usr/sbin/pppd is:
-rwsr-x---   1 root     dip        124496 May 30 12:29 /usr/sbin/pppd*

i.e. only users in group dip can run pppd

/etc/ppp and /etc/ppp/peers want to be mode 0750, group dip

Then have /etc/ppp/peers/provider which contains the relevant ppp options.

This will allow users to open up a limited set of ppp configurations, but
not to change those configurations.

HTH

SRH
-- 
Steve Haslam      http://www.arise.demon.co.uk/      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux Maintainer                               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux/Solaris pgmr/sysadmin for sale    http://www.arise.demon.co.uk/cv.html
I will protect you from your visions to save you from illusions
I will protect you from ideals to save you from defeat            [covenant]

------------------------------

From: Gyepi Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: using two modems in ppp server
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 11:51:49 -0400

/etc/ppp/options.ttyS1 :
================
175.20.254.11:175.20.224.24
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^   This line is the same as

/etc/ppp/options.ttyS3
===============
175.20.254.11:175.20.224.1
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^    This one.

These lines say <local>:<remote> so you are giving the same local ip address to the
interfaces.
Looks like they are behaving according to their setup, but I think you've got the
local and remote IP s reversed.

Gyepi

Mathhew Johnston wrote:

> HI all
>
> I am having a bit of a problem setting up a PPP server at work using linux
> (kernel 2.2.4), I have two modems installed one on ttyS1 and one on ttyS3, I'm
> using mgetty ver 1.0.0 to answer the incoming calls, pppd ver 2.3.7 for the
> interface connection, using both IPX, and IP, they both answer the calls
> fine and configure the PPP Interface with the set IPX Node and IP Address for
> ttyS3 (the first modem I have installed), but when using the modem in ttyS1 the
> IPX Node Address is right, but the IP address is still the IP address assigned
> to the other modem (ttyS3), I have a common /etc/ppp/options file, and the
> etc/ppp/options.ttyS1 and options.ttyS3 for each modem which has the individual
> IPX and IP settings. here are the files used in my setup.....If anybody has
> anycules please let me know....thanks.
>
> /etc/ppp/options :
> ------------
>
> modem
> kdebug 1
> crtscts
> auth
> lock
> ipx
> ipx-network 00000003
> ipx-routing 2
> ipx-router-name LinuxPPP
> ipxcp-accept-remote
> ms-dns 175.20.254.5
> netmask 255.255.0.0
> login
> -chap
> +pap
> proxyarp
>
> /etc/ppp/options.ttyS1 :
> ----------------
>
> ipx-node ABCDEF03:0
> 175.20.254.11:175.20.224.24
>
> /etc/ppp/options.ttyS3
> ---------------
>
> ipx-node ABCDEF02:0
> 175.20.254.11:175.20.224.1
>
> /usr/local/etc/mgetty+sendfax/login.config
> -----------------------------
>
> /AutoPPP/ -     -       /usr/sbin/pppd
>
> /etc/inittab
> -------
>
> # Dialup lines
> S1:12345:respawn:/usr/local/sbin/mgetty -D -s 115200 /dev/ttyS1
> S3:12345:respawn:/usr/local/sbin/mgetty -D -s 115200 /dev/ttyS3
>
> cheers mat
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]




------------------------------

From: Thomann KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Re: Time corrupted using Samba
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 17:14:40 +0200

"C.E.O." wrote:

> kht:
> the dates even come up if doing a "dir" in NT.  not only are wrong in NT but
> different from what samba show.

I found that dates which are ok in NT (using dir) are wrong in Linux using
smbmount,
but are correct using ls in smbclient !!

>
>
> i will continue looking at it and let you know if i found something (please
> do the same).

Shure !!

> I can not build because make guest all confused due to the
> wrong dates...
>
> I already sent an email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> CEO
>
>

Yes, please let me know if you get a solution for this.
Perhaps it's a bug in smbmount ??

--
=====================================
I  Karl-Heinz Thomann               I
I  Feingeraetebau Tritschler GmbH   I
I  Schoenaustrasse 10-12            I
I  D - 79725 Laufenburg             I
I  T: 07763 9388 0                  I
I  F: 07763 9388 49                 I
=====================================




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank)
Subject: Re: Samba and win98 problems
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 17:24:27 +0200

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
says...
> Actually, WinNT uses encryption unless you go mess around w/ your registry
> (like Win98).
> 
> Dirk Riebesell wrote:
> 
> > Win95 and NT are transfering plain passwd. Win98 are using a security
> > protocol. You have to change this in your Win98 Registry (Don't know the
> > full path)
> >
> > Greetings
> >    Dirk Riebesell
> 
> 

to be precise:

add
EnablePlainTextPassword (reg Dword) 1
to
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\VxD\Vnetsup
in your Win98 registry to enable plain text passwords...

Frank

------------------------------

From: "Hoyt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Can't Figure Out Base Address for Gateway Etherent Card
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 12:08:55 -0400

I have several ethernet cards simply marked "Gateway".

The base I/O address is set using four dip switches, but I do not have =
the docs so Idon't know the base address.

I have searched for docs, but could find none.=20

Does anyone know the settings?

Is there a Linux or MS program that will auto-detect the base address?

Hoyt


------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to