Linux-Networking Digest #506, Volume #11 Sat, 12 Jun 99 06:13:40 EDT
Contents:
Re: Linux vs. 3CON Etherlink III (bryan)
dns question (David Bell)
Re: Linux-router question - connecting pc to T1 ("Lee Sharp")
Re: Scriptable telnet Client ("Andrey Smirnov")
Re: Linux and ADSL with GTE (bryan)
Re: Can't connect to my ISP yet, here's the pppd-output... (Owen Cook)
Token Ring Card , Laptop ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: How to setup a network?????????? (Jerry L Kreps)
Re: pppd 2.3.6 + Kernel 2.2.1 don't work!! (Rage-DCA)
Linux in mixed network environment ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Free Sex Links 6152 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: SECURITY ISSUES: Single user restriction at lilo boot: (Bryan)
Re: ipchains and MS Netmeeting (Bryan)
Re: Which brand and type NICs and HUBs for startup ISP? (Top Cat)
khjhkjhjkh ("Jerry Keey")
Linux box in NT network (Matthieu Villeneuve)
Re: NFS Daemon trouble (won't start) (keyr)
smbfs + autofs + RedHat 6.0 = broken??? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Telnet like root ("Roy C.")
Re: Connection using PAP authentication fails -- please help (more info) (Tom Herman)
Newbie in need of HELP: Squid DNS problem (Markus Weimer)
NFS Daemon won't start under RH6.0 (keyr)
Help Needed with routing problem.... (Kevin Anderson)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux vs. 3CON Etherlink III
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 07:03:54 GMT
Ross Vandegrift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > I agree, under Windows I've had no problems with my 509b (Etherlink
: > III ISA -TPO in PnP mode, according to windows). However, I've had
: > trouble getting it to work at all in Linux.
: Well, that's your problem. I suppose that I forgot to mention in my last
: email (and I apologize for this omission) you really need to take it out of
: PnP mode. I have previously used isapnp to configure it, but to do it
: right, just reboot into DOS, and run the setup program on the EtherDisk
: provided with the card. Diable the PnP abilities of the card and configure
: it yourself (using the setting that Windows currently says it uses). Then,
: Windows and Linux should both be happy.
this (above) is the correct solution. see, this was a 'peculiar' card
in that it was software initialized (config then saved to nvram) and
that it needed to have its [broken] pnp turned off from dos/windoze.
once this is semi-permanently done (it can be reversed, but why
bother?) linux will -THEN- see this card and all will be well. this
is (or should be) pretty well known.. at least it was when the card
first came out and all the flurry of linux 'wont work' posts were seen
here ;-)
--
Bryan [at] Grateful.Net
http://www.Grateful.Net
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Bell)
Subject: dns question
Date: 12 Jun 1999 07:10:11 GMT
I am have bind 8something running on my RH5.2 computer. Very soon it is going
to be used as a gateway to the internet, and I was wondering if I have to list
the dns address of my isp on my windows clients? Can I just put the ip address
of my dns server/gateway on my private network in the dns information area in
windows? Can or will my dns forward internet requests to my isp? These
questions are from a newbie so talk slowly and use small words.
=========================
David Bell
Please don't email me just reply on the board.
------------------------------
From: "Lee Sharp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux-router question - connecting pc to T1
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 07:28:12 GMT
Tim Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Currently I have a linux box, acting as a firewall and running squid
> for proxy sitting between my network and a Cisco 1600 which in turn is
> connected to a T1.
Actually, your Cisco is connected to a TSU or CSU or DSU, which connects
to the T1. On that xSU, you may have more than one port. Most have V.35,
and many also have RS232 and others. This is importaint later.
> I was curious as to who makes hardware which will enable me to connect
> the linux firewall directly to the T1?
All you need is a high speed serial card with the right port. V.35 is
the usual router standard, but others may work with your xSU.
> Would I see any performance gains?
Actually, the reverse may be true. First you have encoding. You never
said what kind of T1 it is. Clear channel? Frame Relay? ATM? Only the
first works easily with Linux under PPP.
Now you have all the neat default settings. Things like compression,
encapsulation, RIP, BofL... <BofL is for Breath of Life, a packet that
keeps the circuit up> It is had to get Cisco to talk with Bay^h^h^hNortel.
With Linux, you have a whole new set of headaches.
Lastely, is the Cisco really a bottleneck? Or is the T1. A chain is
only as strong as it's weakest link, and usually that is the line.
Lee
--
SCSI is *NOT* magic. There are *fundamental technical reasons* why it is
necessary to sacrifice a young goat to your SCSI chain now and then. *
Black holes are where God divided by zero. - I am speaking as an
individual, not as a representative of any company, organization or other
entity. I am solely responsible for my words.
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Scriptable telnet Client
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 00:19:01 -0700
Hello,
You can write simple Unix scipts and use rcmd to execute them on remote
machines.
Good luck!
brian wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I am looking for a Linux telnet client for which I can write scripts.
>Loops, conditions, variables, wait for, send...the works. One I used
>under 'dows was ZOC...something like that would be great. Or, if I could
>somehow write scripts for the one I have (the standard telnet for RH
>6.0)
>
>Any advice / information would be appreciated.
>
>Brian
------------------------------
From: bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux and ADSL with GTE
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 07:10:57 GMT
Joe Halpin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Anyway, thanks for the feedback, it gives me something to go on. It's
: probably worth it just to let them think whatever they want, and setup a
: Linux box, but I'd like to be sure there isn't some real reason why that
: wouldn't work first.
<how to deal with a clueless ISP>
if they don't list linux, tell them you wish they did, but you'll go
ahead and settle for the dos/win-stuff for now. this will make them
happy.
then install/configure linux. this will make you happy.
now everyone's happy...
</how to deal with a cluless ISP>
--
Bryan [at] Grateful.Net
http://www.Grateful.Net
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Owen Cook)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Can't connect to my ISP yet, here's the pppd-output...
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 07:51:55 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 07 Jun 1999 03:58:36 -0400, DonJr <donjr@[127.0.0.1]> wrote:
>The easiest way I've found to setup pppd under RH 5.2 or RH 6.0 is:
> # linuxconf { either under X or text mode take you pick}
> - Networking
> - Client tasks
><good stuff snipped>
>
>Now at the command prompt
> $ /sbin/ifup ppp0 will bring up the connection
> $ /sbin/ifdown ppp0 will bring down the connection
After trying, and failing a hundred times to use ppp-on etc, I tried
linuxconf as suggested in this post. It worked first time, and
continues to work.
However the /sbin/ifdown ppp0 doesn't work and would appreciate any
suggestion as where I should be looking to fix this problem.
Owen
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.portable
Subject: Token Ring Card , Laptop
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 07:52:08 GMT
Hi !
I use a Thinkpad 760 ED with a PCMCIA-Token-Ring-Adapter (Token Ring
Auto 16/4 or Token Ring Turbo 16/4).
As OS I use Suse Linux 6.1 (selfmade kernel (2.2.5) with TR-support)
with Pcmcia-Tools version 3.0.11.
The Pcmcia-Tools work fine if I use my normal Ethernet-Card or my
Modem-Card. If I insert one of the two Token-Ring-Cards it is getting
funny.
cardctl detects my Token-Ring Card. If I go for
ifconfig tr0 up
my system hangs. Than I have to shutdown my system.
Does anybody know why my system hangs when I execute ifconfig ?
netstat confirms Token-Ring-Support.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Kind Regards
Florian
------------------------------
From: Jerry L Kreps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to setup a network??????????
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 00:31:01 -0500
Show your routing tables?
What brand of NIC are you using?
John R. wrote:
>
> HELP!!!!!!!
>
> I am tring to set up a winodws 95 machine on a Linux 6.0 file server. I am
> a rookie at this so be gentle. I already have the IP address, subnet mask
> set on both machines, but I can't ping either one or telnet into either one.
> All the hardware is good, and the cableing. The Network card is installed
> and configured correctly but I still can't figure out what the problem is.
> If any one can help with this please e-mail me with any possible solutions.
> Thanks!!!!
>
> John Roeser
> American Warming & Ventilating
--
__ _
/ / (_)__ __ ____ __ * Powerful * Flexible * Compatible *
Reliable *
/ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / *Well Supported * Thousands of New Users
Every Day*
/____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ The Cost Effective Choice - Linux Means
Business!
------------------------------
From: Rage-DCA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: pppd 2.3.6 + Kernel 2.2.1 don't work!!
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 07:44:03 GMT
Jack Zhu wrote:
> Just need somebody to help me out of the linux nightmare. This is just one
> respect that Linux cannot beat MS windows: how many people really know how
> to configure ppp dialup in Linux, and how many people know this in MS
> windows.
>
> My experience:
>
> I used Redhat 5.0(Kernel 2.0.32) + pppd 2.2.0 to dialup to my ISP. It works
> well. Then I upgrade kernel to 2.2.1, obviously it doesn't work with pppd
> 2.2.0. (This point is very hard to be found in these Kernel documents). So I
> also upgrade my pppd to 2.3.6 by following the instructions.
>
> The nightmare is: I use the same scripts, same configuration and same dialup
> number. This time the combination of kernel and pppd doesn't work. When I
> try to call "pppd", the error message is:
>
> "/usr/sbin/pppd: peer authentication required, but no suitable secret(s)
> found
> /usr/sbin/pppd: for authenticating any peer to us.(abc)"
>
> "abc" is my logname to my ISP.
>
> Why this happen? I do have a pap-secret file, and everything works just well
> in the earlier version.
>
> Any idea? Maybe I'd better back to earlier version.
>
> Thanks a lot! Please email me.
>
> BTW, I DO believe Linux can never never be a big role.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ya know what your problem is? your stupid. if you would read the freaking text
files, you would figure it out. i started with a blank partition, slack 3.5,
and my brain. i figured everything out in 3 months so just shut up and stop
saying linux sucks. its not that it sucks its just that you don't have the
willpower to learn how to use it. my philosophy was linux or bust. besides
using linux in the business scene, i've conquered it all in about 5 months.
course there is still many avenues to explore, but i know my stuff (i started
with slack because it seemed hard and it was and it taught me well). so
basically what i'm trying to say is, don't complain until you have something to
complain about.
--
Jason Osborne (Rage-DCA)
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://rage.dynip.com
- LinuxInside - I run it, do you?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux in mixed network environment
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 07:06:36 GMT
I was wondering if any one could tell me whether or not I could use
Linux as a proxy server at my work. We have two networks, Novell
Netware(Office computers), and Unix running Appletalk(Graphics
department).
What I would like to do is setup a Linux box so the Office computers
have access to the Internet as well as the Graphics dept. And also have
a FTP site. Can this be done with the two different networks using on
machine?
Any input would be appreciated.
Thank You.
Sean Magula
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Free Sex Links 6152
Date: 12 Jun 1999 06:52:16 GMT
For the nastiest sex pictures visit:
http://freespace.virgin.net/efrwer.werewrd/
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 04:16:21 +0000
From: Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.security,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: SECURITY ISSUES: Single user restriction at lilo boot:
Clifford Smith wrote:
>
> In comp.os.linux.security David Renton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : Hello,
>
> : How about encrypting the file system? Linux Journal had an article on this
> : in July 1998 which used the DES/IDEA kernel patches to allow encrypting a
> : file system. Hence the only way to mount the file system would be with a
> : password.
>
> yes, that would work but it's not what he needs......
>
> :> I know that booting from floppy as single user and mounting the root
> :> disk can be used to rescue a system with a forgotten root password. I'm
> :> also aware that this is a part of any unix system.
> <snip>
>
> :> Comming to the point, How do you block the "linux single" param at boot
> :> up? what other work arounds can you suggest? Since these are PCs and
> :> have reset buttons, power cords any user can reboot the machine.
>
> man lilo.conf explains how to password protect the Linux single option.
> Also, most modern day BIOS's offer the ability to prevent booting from a
> floppy. I'm assuming, of course, that this is in a lab where a student
> won't be able to take the case off and kill the BIOS without being noticed
> or recorded on film :)
>
> --Clifford Smith
Another way would be to tell LILO not to even wait at a prompt but to go
right into the boot sequence. This would prevent, of course, *anyone*
from even going into single user mode, but would provide the *most*
security. With a password protected BIOS that ignores the floppy and
CDROM drive on boot, you'd be good to go.
To get in, one would have to 1) know the BIOS password to change the
BIOS settings, 2) have a special boot floppy with a copy of the kernel
and/or loadlin or something to boot in for system changes. In a school,
this shouldn't be a problem.
-- Bryan Scott
-- CTR Online Systems Administration
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 04:23:06 +0000
From: Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.security
Subject: Re: ipchains and MS Netmeeting
Robert Cicconetti wrote:
>
> The only way I have been able to find is using an application called
> "PhonePatch" from www.equival.com. 30 day trial available. I never
> finished configuring, as the person I'm setting up the firewall for decided
> Netmeeting wasn't worth $50 (cost of PhonePatch).
>
> --
> Robert Cicconetti
> Chris Petzny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:7jo7v5$7tv$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi,
> >
> > for a while now we have been running IP masquerading on our Linux box
> to
> > get the office access to the internet. All controlled through ipchains.
> We'd
> > like to communicate with MS Netmeeting, however, although others can see
> our
> > video and audio, we can't receive theirs. I was wondering if there is a
> > certain port I need to free up, or if there's a kernel module that needs
> to
> > be loaded ( a la CUSeeMe).
> >
> > Current kernel: 2.2.0 running on RedHat 5.0 I can send the ipchains -L
> > output if anybody needs it...
> >
> > Hope you can help,
> > Chris.
> >
> >
> >
Somebody asked and someone else answered this one already.
You're stuck with Netmeeting and some of these because they *initiate*
connections to the receiver's IP address. IP chains work because the
sender is behind the firewall. The routing mechanism remembers the
outgoing connection and expects a *response* on the same port or set of
ports for the same protocol. In the case of Netmeeting and FTP and the
like, there isn't anything to tell the firewall that incoming requests
are meant for the specific machine; it thinks they're going to itself.
(Excepting ftp--I do remember seeing firewall modules for it...)
I believe the answer for now is: No go. ...Unless someone else has
written some new stuff. I've tried NetMeeting and VIRC's video chat
stuff too. Can't get anywhere yet.
-- Bryan Scott
-- CTR Online Systems Administration
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Top Cat)
Subject: Re: Which brand and type NICs and HUBs for startup ISP?
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 08:45:23 GMT
On Fri, 11 Jun 1999 11:42:52 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim) wrote:
>Switches can be 10 times faster than hubs. They do cost more however.
>
>On Fri, 11 Jun 1999 01:51:44 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mezcal) wrote:
>
>>Can someone recommend a good hub for an isp with 300 - 2000 users?
>>I'll be using fast ethernet NICs 10/100, and I want to buy a brand
>>compatible with linux with good performance of course. Also, would a
>>switch be preferable over a fast ethernet hub. And I'd like to know
>>if most of the fast ethernet hubs out now avoide packet collision.
>>Thanks for any information,
>>Chris
Hubs by nature do NOT provide collision mechanisim. A switch can give
you alot better performance. I will be interested to know what kind of
authentication software you will use?
all the best.
------------------------------
From: "Jerry Keey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: khjhkjhjkh
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 10:20:03 +0200
jhkjhjkhll
------------------------------
From: Matthieu Villeneuve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Linux box in NT network
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 10:26:52 +0200
Hello
I must add a Linux (RedHat 5.2) box to a Windows NT 4 network, using
Samba.
I tried to configure Samba, I can see shared resources of NT machines,
NT machines can see me,
but cannot access my disk.
If someone has the same configuration (one Linux box in a Windows
network with a NT 4 server),
could you post me your 'smb.conf' ?
This is my actual 'smb.conf' :
[global]
workgroup = NT-DOMAIN
server string = Samba Server
hosts allow = 192.10.10. 127.
guest account = share
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 50
security = user
password server = 192.10.10.1
encrypt passwords = no
smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
username map = /etc/smbusers
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
; interfaces = 192.10.10.67/255.255.255.0
os level = 32
domain master = no
preferred master = no
domain controller = 192.10.10.1
domain logons = yes
name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast
wins support = no
wins server = 192.10.10.1
wins proxy = no
dns proxy = no
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
browseable = no
writable = yes
[netlogon]
comment = Network Logon Service
path = /home/netlogon
guest ok = yes
writable = no
share modes = no
[Profiles]
path = /home/profiles
browseable = yes
guest ok = yes
[tmp]
comment = Temporary file space
path = /tmp
read only = no
public = yes
[public]
comment = Public Stuff
path = /home/samba
browseable = yes
public = yes
writable = yes
printable = no
------------------------------
From: keyr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: NFS Daemon trouble (won't start)
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 10:43:19 +0200
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============30878A890A3A2B28351C1D26
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
matt wrote:
> Ummm, I might be missing something... My Redhat 5.2, which is the latest
> version availabe from the Redhat web page, is called Apollo. 5.1 was
> called Manhattan and 4.2 was Biltmore (all confermed from the the Redhat
> www page 4/19/99). If Starbuck is a pre-release of the new Redhat based
> on the 2.2.5 kernel, I would suggest getting hold of Redhat... Or you
> could try to recompile the kernel to insure that NFS support is compiled
> into the kernel...
>
> Magnus Therkildsen wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have installed the latest Redhat (Starbuck), with kernel 2.2.5-4. I
> > configured it to run the NFS server during installation. However, the
> > NFS daemon will not start, it says:
> > nfssvc: funtion not implemented
> >
> > I looked at my modules (with lsmod), and there where no nfs, so I tried
> > insmod nfs. This also gave me an error: unresolved symbol
> > add_to_lookup_cache.
> >
> > I feel pretty lost in this. I don't want to use the new kernel nfs
> > server, since my fileserver must be very stable.
> >
> > I hope someone can help. Thanks in advance!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Magnus
> >
> > --
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> > IP Semiconductors Tel. (+45) 4525 3803
> > COM Center, DTU Fax. (+45) 4587 1866
> > Building 348-349 Cell.(+45) 2625 1289
> > DK-2800 Lyngby http://www.ipsemiconductors.com
> > Denmark mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
With kernel versions 2.2.5 to 2.3.5 I get the same message: nfssvc:
Function not Implemented
I have definetly compiled NFS support in the kernel. I have emailed Red Hat
with this query as it looks like a kernel problem. I will post their reply
when I get it.
I wonder if kernel versions 2.0 will allow the nfsd to run?
Rob Key
==============30878A890A3A2B28351C1D26
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="keyr.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for keyr
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="keyr.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Key;Robert
tel;cell:0822020591
tel;fax:021-959-6117
tel;home:021-855-1556 Cell: 0822020591
tel;work:021-959-6081
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:ftp://panda.pentech.ac.za
org:Peninsula Technikon;Electrical Engineering
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Mr
note:my address
adr;quoted-printable:;;P. O. Box 5432=0D=0AHelderberg;Somerset West;Western
Cape;7135;R S A
x-mozilla-cpt:;-6496
fn:Robert Key
end:vcard
==============30878A890A3A2B28351C1D26==
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: smbfs + autofs + RedHat 6.0 = broken???
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 07:33:34 GMT
Redhat installs:
Samba version 2.0.3
Autofs version 3.1.3
Somewhere between the version of samba that shipped with
RH5.2 and the version that shipped with RH6.0 the command
line parameters for smbmount appear to have changed.
old format : /usr/sbin/smbmount //Myserver/Myshare
/mypath/mymountpoint <options>
new format : /usr/sbin/smbmount //Myserver/Myshare <options> -c 'mount
/mypath/mymountpoint'
After being unable to get automount to work with -fstype=smbfs,
I downloaded the autofs-3.1.3 sources. autofs appears to be
calling smbmount using the old format.
Is there a patch to make autofs mount smbfs shares?
Is anyone working on this issue?
If I have missed something obvious, please point me in the right
direction.
Thanks
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Roy C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Telnet like root
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 16:07:25 +0700
You do this by listing more terminal device names in
/etc/securetty. (I'm using Slackware 3.5, but I'm
not sure if this also works with Red Hat 6.0.)
This is what my /etc/securetty looks like:
console
tty1
tty2
tty3
tty4
tty5
tty6
ttyS0
ttyS1
ttyS2
ttyS3
ttyp0
ttyp1
ttyp2
ttyp3
So, in your case, you might want to add: ttyp4 to ttypXX
Note: For security reason, you shouldn't telnet as root.
It's better to log in as a normal user, and then su to
become superuser.
-Roy
Angel wrote:
> I'm working with Red Hat 6.0. I can't telnet and login like root, but
>like another account it's OK.
>
> How can I open a telnet session like root?
>
>
> Thanks
>
>Angel Belda
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
------------------------------
From: Tom Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Connection using PAP authentication fails -- please help (more info)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 16:40:25 GMT
> Jun 5 16:46:08 vignesh chat[529]: send (ATDP5300222^M)
> Jun 5 16:46:09 vignesh chat[529]: expect (CONNECT)
> Jun 5 16:46:09 vignesh chat[529]: ^M
> Jun 5 16:46:26 vignesh chat[529]: ATDP5300222^M^M
> Jun 5 16:46:26 vignesh pppd[528]: Connect script failed
> Jun 5 16:46:26 vignesh chat[529]: BUSY^M
> Jun 5 16:46:26 vignesh chat[529]: -- failed
> Jun 5 16:46:26 vignesh chat[529]: Failed ( BUSY^M)
> Jun 5 16:46:27 vignesh pppd[528]: Exit.
> Jun 5 16:46:48 vignesh pppd[530]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
> Jun 5 16:46:49 vignesh chat[531]: timeout set to 3 seconds
> Jun 5 16:46:49 vignesh chat[531]: abort on (\nBUSY\r)
> Jun 5 16:46:49 vignesh chat[531]: abort on (\nNO ANSWER\r)
> Jun 5 16:46:49 vignesh chat[531]: abort on (\nNO CARRIER\r)
> Jun 5 16:46:49 vignesh chat[531]: send (rATZ^M)
> Jun 5 16:46:49 vignesh chat[531]: timeout set to 30 seconds
> Jun 5 16:46:49 vignesh chat[531]: expect (OK)
> Jun 5 16:46:50 vignesh chat[531]: rATZ^M^M
> Jun 5 16:46:50 vignesh chat[531]: OK
> Jun 5 16:46:50 vignesh chat[531]: -- got it
> Jun 5 16:46:50 vignesh chat[531]: send (ATDP5300222^M)
> Jun 5 16:46:50 vignesh chat[531]: expect (CONNECT)
> Jun 5 16:46:50 vignesh chat[531]: ^M
> Jun 5 16:47:17 vignesh chat[531]: ATDP5300222^M^M
> Jun 5 16:47:17 vignesh chat[531]: CONNECT
> Jun 5 16:47:17 vignesh chat[531]: -- got it
> Jun 5 16:47:17 vignesh chat[531]: send (^M)
> Jun 5 16:47:17 vignesh pppd[530]: Serial connection established.
> Jun 5 16:47:18 vignesh pppd[530]: Using interface ppp0
> Jun 5 16:47:18 vignesh pppd[530]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
> Jun 5 16:47:48 vignesh pppd[530]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
> Jun 5 16:47:48 vignesh pppd[530]: Connection terminated.
> Jun 5 16:47:48 vignesh pppd[530]: Receive serial link is not 8-bit clean:
> Jun 5 16:47:48 vignesh pppd[530]: Problem: all had bit 7 set to 0
> Jun 5 16:47:49 vignesh pppd[530]: Exit.
> **********************************************************************
I expected to see ATDT instead of ATDP. 'P' means do pulse dialing.
'T' means use touchtone dialing. Hardly anyone uses pulse dialing
anymore. This was used when old rotary phones were in use.
Second, the 8-bit clean part means to me your modem is not initialized
the way it wants to me. I'd try 'minicom' to view/set the modem
init string in the modem bios. But be careful to write down the
settings before and after any change.
HTH
Tom
--
The views expressed are the author's and do not necessarily
reflect the official position of GTE or any of its subsidiaries
------------------------------
From: Markus Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Newbie in need of HELP: Squid DNS problem
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 10:59:50 +0200
Hi!
I�m a networking newbie in need of help. I managed to make RedHat5.2 use
the ISDN-Card and to dial to the ISP using PPP. Now I want to use Squid
to serve the other Win95-Computers in the 192.168.1.x network. But when
the system boots and should start squid, I get an error messsage, that
squid has an DNS lookup problem.
I can start squid after I connected to the ISP. If squid runs I may shut
down the internet-connection and restart it without problems.
Now my question: How to avoid this errer and make squid start while the
system boots.
Thanks in advance for any help suggestions.
Markus Weimer
------------------------------
From: keyr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NFS Daemon won't start under RH6.0
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 10:50:55 +0200
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============4AA353D1745A12EA6C5F3E44
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi,
The nfsd (rpc.nfsd) daemon won't run under kernel versions 2.2.0 to
2.3.6.
Terminates with the message:
nfssvc: Function not Imlemented.
Does the nfsd daemon run on kernel versions 2.0? Please post a message
if it does.
I have asked Red Hat for an explanation but am still waiting.
I will post it if I get it!
Thanks.
Robert Key
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==============4AA353D1745A12EA6C5F3E44
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="keyr.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for keyr
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="keyr.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Key;Robert
tel;cell:0822020591
tel;fax:021-959-6117
tel;home:021-855-1556 Cell: 0822020591
tel;work:021-959-6081
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:ftp://panda.pentech.ac.za
org:Peninsula Technikon;Electrical Engineering
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Mr
note:my address
adr;quoted-printable:;;P. O. Box 5432=0D=0AHelderberg;Somerset West;Western
Cape;7135;R S A
x-mozilla-cpt:;-6496
fn:Robert Key
end:vcard
==============4AA353D1745A12EA6C5F3E44==
------------------------------
From: Kevin Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help Needed with routing problem....
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 10:08:26 +0100
I'm relatively new to linux, and have an odd and presently difficult
problem:
I have two border routers, one to another site and one default to the
internet. The route table entries are :
192.0.2.0 194.73.58.171 255.255.255.0 UG 1500 0 0 eth0
for the other site and
0.0.0.0 194.73.58.1 0.0.0.0 UG 1500 0 0 eth0
for default. When I ping/traceroute a system on the other lan it works
fine, I deduce my linux setup is therefore OK. When I ping for example
www.redhat.com, I get no reply, and traceroute shows me no entries. All
my
other system - SCO, WinNT, Solaris, work fine and see both the other
site AND internet sites.
Anyone seen similar or got any ideas? This is driving me crazy because
at the moment the WinNT faction are crowing & I can't make any reply
because I can't solve it!!!
HEEELLLLPPP!!
TIA
Kevin Anderson
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
