Linux-Networking Digest #523, Volume #11 Sun, 13 Jun 99 16:13:45 EDT
Contents:
Re: WIN98 and REDHAT5.2 (Kenyon Ralph)
Re: Networking System for Linux environment (David Efflandt)
Re: Networking System for Linux environment (Nicholas E Couchman)
Re: PPP and USR modem ("Nigel Feltham")
Re: Problem with RedHat 5.2 and Intel EtherExpress 16 ("Gregory D. Horne")
Re: IPCHAINS , IP MASQUERADING (Malware)
Re: samba (Malware)
Re: debian and 2 nic's (Malware)
Direct Connect Linux&Win ?? ("dpc")
IP Masquerading ("Rob")
Re: samba (Nicholas E Couchman)
Figuring Out Used IRQ's? (Kosh Banerjee)
Re: Why is linux perfomance bad compared to windows? (Alec Marsh)
Re: ping shows duplicate but only one interface (Malware)
Re: pppd or lan but not both?? help (Malware)
Re: debian and 2 nic's (Hartmann Schaffer)
Re: network throughput and NAT32 (Aris Cruz)
Troubleshoot masquerading 'lag' (Bert)
Re: DNS Boggle ("Andrey Smirnov")
Re: Setting up a mail server on RH 6.0 ("Andrey Smirnov")
Re: Problem configuring PCMCIA Network card ("Richard A. Bilonick")
Re: more diald stuff (Brian Witowski)
Re: PPP default route problems?? ("Gregory D. Horne")
Re: afpfs can be found here... (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn?= Ruberg)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kenyon Ralph)
Subject: Re: WIN98 and REDHAT5.2
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 18:25:58 GMT
On 13 Jun 1999 01:52:49 PDT, John B wrote:
> I would like to network my Win 98 machine with my Linux machine. I have
> the NIC and Hub. I cant seem to get it going. I am not sure how to assign
> IPs etc ie , gateway, subnet, routing.
In Windows 98, use the Network Control Panel to set the network up.
In Linux, use ifconfig and route. man ifconfig;man route
There are plenty of docs too, like the NET-3 HOWTO:
http://www.kernelnotes.org/LDP
--
Kenyon Ralph | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://home.san.rr.com/ralphs
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Efflandt)
Subject: Re: Networking System for Linux environment
Date: 13 Jun 1999 18:19:48 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 13 Jun 1999 06:57:25 GMT, Daniele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi, I'm new to Linux. Currently, in the office, we're running Redhat
>6.0 with Samba acts as a File and Printer Server, on 486DX100 with
>32Mb RAM. The clients are Windows 98.
>
>We also have a few old 486 which we'll install the Redhat to for use
>as clients. I wonder if somebody can tell me what is the best network
>system configuration so these old ones can participate in the LAN? I
>mean is it NFS or whatever?
It depends upon what you want to do.
If you want to interact with Windows, then the same way as your existing
Linux box does, Samba. The CD on my Linux box started making stange
noises, so I smbmount the CD on a Win95 box to it.
--
David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xnet.com/~efflandt/
------------------------------
From: Nicholas E Couchman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Networking System for Linux environment
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 18:22:26 GMT
Don't use NFS. RH 6 is compatible with so much more that using NFS is
not the right choice. Samba (for me anyway), works great. You can also
use standard TCP/IP (telnet, ftp, etc.). I'm not a Linux guru (yet), but
I have tried NFS and it doesn't work that well.
--Nick
Daniele wrote:
> Hi, I'm new to Linux. Currently, in the office, we're running Redhat
> 6.0 with Samba acts as a File and Printer Server, on 486DX100 with
> 32Mb RAM. The clients are Windows 98.
>
> We also have a few old 486 which we'll install the Redhat to for use
> as clients. I wonder if somebody can tell me what is the best network
> system configuration so these old ones can participate in the LAN? I
> mean is it NFS or whatever?
>
> Thank you for your help and assitance. I am very appreciate it.
>
> Regards,
> Daniele
------------------------------
From: "Nigel Feltham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP and USR modem
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 18:53:38 +0100
Hi,
Have you tried other alternative commands to initialise modem, such as AT&F0
, AT&F2 or ATZ.
I have connected to my isp with the same model modem as you using the same
modem commands as you (different phone number obviously) and this is
working. You could also try using a terminal program to reset the internal
NVRAM registers to their default values as printed in the back of the manual
in case one of them is switching the modem into a strange communication
mode.
I hope this helps, if not then let me know and I will try to offer more
help.
Nigel
Michel Roux wrote in message <7k0hrk$mr0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi
>
>Under SuSe Linux 6.0, I'd like to connect using PPP. The modem used is an
>external US Robotics Sportster Voice FaxModem 33600. Usung either scripts
or
>kppp, it is dialing out OK, but after the CONNECT statement, I am receiving
>garbage characters rather than the expected "login:" prompt.
>The contents of the debug window is:
>
>AT&F1
>OK
>ATDT0144322777
>RINGING
>
>CONNECT 28800/ARQ/V34/LAPM/V42BIS
>~~}#@!}!N} }8}"}&} }*} } }#}$@#}%}&E2PE}'}"}(}"F}*~~}#@!}!O} }8}"}&} }*}
}
> }#}$@#}%}&E2PE}'}"}(}"}/ ~~}#@!}!P} }8}"}&} }*} } }#}$@#}%}&E2PE}'}"}(}"W
>~~}#@!}!Q} }8}"}&} }*} } }#}$@#}%}&E2PE}'}"}(}" }=~~}#@!}!R} }8}"}&} }*}
}
> }#}$@#}%}&E2PE}'}"}(}"T
>~~}#@!}!S} }8}"}&} }*} } }#}$@#}%}&E2PE}'}"}(}"}=}&~~}#@!}!T} }8}"}&} }*}
>} }#}$@#}%}&E2PE}'}"}(}"Q#~~}#@!}!U} }8}"}&} }*} } }#}$@#}%}&E2PE}'}"}(}"
>*~~}#@!}!V} }8}"}&} }*} } }#}$@#}%}&E2PE}'}"}(}"R8~~}#@!}!W} }8}"}&} }*}
}
> }#}$@#}%}&E2PE}'}"}(}"};1~~}#@!}!X} }8}"}&} }*} } }#}$@#}%}&E2PE}'}"}(}"[
z
>~
>NO CARRIER
>
>Any idea?
>
>Michel Roux
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Gregory D. Horne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Problem with RedHat 5.2 and Intel EtherExpress 16
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 14:13:07 -0400
James Strompolis wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've got a network card problem that maybe someone could help me with.
> I've got an Intel EtherExpress 16 that will only work on the BNC interface.
> I've set up RedHat 5.2 on an old 486/66 just to play with a bit. I've got
> it installed. I've got the network card properly configured and I'm using
> the eexpress driver. I've configured the card using Intel Softset to use
> the 10BaseT interface. On boot, it detects the card, detects the interface
> as 10baseT and all of the other parameters are correct. It refuses to work
> on the 10BaseT interface. If I connect the card to my network on the BNC
> connector, it works even though I've tried to tell it to use the 10BaseT
> interface. There does not appear to be a supported ifconfig option for
> media type with this driver as it returns an error when I issue "ifconfig
> eth0 media 10baseT". I've looked in the Linux Ethernet How-To for help
> already with no help there.
>
What information is ifconfig returning? Did you try the "media auto" option
with ifconfig?
>
> What am I missing? Thanks in advance to anyone that can be of assistance.
>
> --
>
> James Strompolis
> Aleph Consultants, Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.ribs.com
------------------------------
From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPCHAINS , IP MASQUERADING
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 14:28:33 +0200
Hi Pedro,
you wrote:
> I have two PC, and one connected to the internet by dhcp
>
> the first PC has 2 network cards, one to the dhcp, and one other to
> 192.168.1.1
> the second pc has the address 192.168.1.2
> and the gateway 192.168.1.1
>
> i launch :
>
> ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -s 192.168.1.2 -i eth1 -d 0.0.0.0/0
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
Is "eth1" the interface pointing to the outside? If not replace it by
the name of this interface.
Malware
------------------------------
From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: samba
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 14:41:04 +0200
Hi mark,
you wrote:
> Is there anyway to use samba with NT as a client without hacking the NT4's
> registry on SP3 or above. I would like to use win2k as a client but the
> registry is different so hacking isn't an option ( plus i hate clear text ).
Just use a later version of SAMBA and enable encrypted passwords as
stated within the documentation.
Malware
------------------------------
From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: debian and 2 nic's
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 14:31:42 +0200
Hi Blake,
you wrote:
> I have re-compiled the kernel with support for a SMC ultra isa network
> card I have 2) .With one card installed at a time, they are found.
> However when both are installed only one is found. Any ideas? oh yeah
> they have different io addresses and irq's..
Read about the "ether=" boot argument in the BootPrompt-HOWTO.
Malware
------------------------------
From: "dpc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Direct Connect Linux&Win ??
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 14:31:50 -0400
I've got two boxes sitting right next to each other and both have NIC cards.
I don't want to spend the money on a hub so I just want to be able to hook
the two directly. In my understanding, in order to do this I have to get a
crossover cable. (Switch wires 1,2 with 3,6 on the Cat5 RJ-45 Ethernet
cable). If that's the case, what else do I need or have to do
(software-wise) to set up the computers? One is running Win98/NT/Linux
(yes, all of them, not at once though <grin>) and the other is pure Linux
with a little Be on the side.
So, once I get a crossover cable (if I do, in fact, need that cable)
A: How do I get them to be able to share resources, and access each other?
2: One box (the Win98/NT/Linxu) has a modem (home from school for the summer
:-( hehe) and I want to be able to access the internet from the box w/o a
modem through that direct connect I have between the two NIC cards.
Thank you for any help/advice you can give or pointers in the direction of
some good texts.
dpc
Remove AllYourClothes. if you want to e-mail me directly.
------------------------------
From: "Rob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP Masquerading
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 20:33:05 +0200
I am very new to Linux (RH5.2) and am struggling with a number of problems.
One of these is the seting up of the Linux box to act as a server? /
gateway? to the Internet for a W95 box.
I have Linux running on a W95 box and another W95 box on an ethernet
connection. I would like to have simulataneous access to the Internet from
both boxes. I believe that IP Masquerading is in some way the key to this
but I have no idea what this is. I can't find a HOWTO that explains it
either.
Thank you
Rob
------------------------------
From: Nicholas E Couchman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: samba
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 18:24:05 GMT
If you have RH6, you can use Linuxconf to enable password encryption, otherwise,
edit the smb.conf file (located in /etc), and uncomment the line that enables
password encryption.
--Nick
Malware wrote:
> Hi mark,
>
> you wrote:
> > Is there anyway to use samba with NT as a client without hacking the NT4's
> > registry on SP3 or above. I would like to use win2k as a client but the
> > registry is different so hacking isn't an option ( plus i hate clear text ).
>
> Just use a later version of SAMBA and enable encrypted passwords as
> stated within the documentation.
>
> Malware
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kosh Banerjee)
Subject: Figuring Out Used IRQ's?
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 17:35:42 GMT
I have an old IBM Valuepoint 486. I need to figure out which interrupts are
currently being used. Is there a way to do this? If any of this matters,
here's my set up:
Red Hat 5.2
2 IDE hard drives
1 IDE CD-ROM drive
1 3.5" floppy
1 SoundBlaster
1 US Robotics modem
and of course, 1 keyboard and 1 mouse
I am trying to properly configure a Linksys Ether16 LAN card.
Thanks.
K. Banerjee
------------------------------
From: Alec Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why is linux perfomance bad compared to windows?
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 13:16:34 -0500
Kwan Lowe wrote:
> 1) Reliability -- Linux boxes don't go down.
Hey, mine went down just last night.
Of course, the power failure helped...
--
..signature missing
------------------------------
From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ping shows duplicate but only one interface
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 20:32:13 +0200
Hi Juergen,
you wrote:
> >the 2 response times. If I pull the cable on the LINUX box and ping the
> >IP it does not exist.
> Yes ... Linux can do wonders but this is a tough one even for it 8)
>
> Now I guess you received a message regarding duplicate packages ? If so,
> nothing to worry here. Ping's ICMP packages are not sent using the TCP
I don't think it's very clever to ignore this if it does allready occour
in a LAN. While if machines are connected over the internet I see no
problem. I once had a Linux 2.2 box doing this but could not find out
why since after a reboot it went back to normal. Seek through the logs
of the Linux-machine to see if it does have problems handling the
network-card. Use tcpdump -e to see if the duplicate does come from the
same machine or another machine does run crazy. Look out for the echo
request too, maybe allready this did got duplicated.
Malware
------------------------------
From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: pppd or lan but not both?? help
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 20:42:35 +0200
Hi propsync,
you wrote:
> the default gateway is 10.255.255.254 (linux chose this)
That seems to be your problem. If you have a default-geteway within the
LAN, pppd will not replace this default route.
> In kppp, my setup is for 2 dns addresses, 209.117.223.2 and
> 209.117.223.3 with a dynamic ip address
Using kppp for bringing a LAN into the internet is a terribly nice idea.
;-(
Do you like to sit on the phone only waiting for someone calling that he
does want to use the internet now, and then start kppp to get the line
up?
> Again, if i have just dialup only, everything is ok, but as soon as i
> add the lan stuff (im connected to a win95 box), I can not get on the
> web. It dials and all but the browser just sits there. I can ping the
> win 95 machine and it can ping me.
You additionally will have to setup maquerading since you'll get only
one IP. Refer to the Masquerading-HOWTO for setting this up.
Malware
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hartmann Schaffer)
Subject: Re: debian and 2 nic's
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 18:43:39 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Blake Patton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have re-compiled the kernel with support for a SMC ultra isa network
> card I have 2) .With one card installed at a time, they are found.
> However when both are installed only one is found. Any ideas? oh yeah
> they have different io addresses and irq's..
It says somewhere in the documentation (either ethernetHOWTO or kernel
documentation) that the autoprobe finds only one ethernet card. For the
second (or both?) you have to add a kernel parameter to the lilo
configuration.
Hartmann Schaffer
------------------------------
From: Aris Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: network throughput and NAT32
Date: 13 Jun 1999 17:30:44 GMT
Linux's = to NAT32 is ipchains (linux 2.2.x or higher) or ipfwadm
(linux2.0.x). You just creat simple firewall rules. A little more work
that nat32, but a lot more reliable. Here is a link to a general howto
for firewalls and using ipfwadm
http://www.linux-howto.com/LDP/HOWTO/Firewall-HOWTO.html
or you can go here for running ipmasq and ipchains
http://www.linux-howto.com/LDP/HOWTO/mini/IP-Masquerade.html
And as far your network running better, are they on a switch? I've seen
switches being sold now for like $150 and it can create so much bandwith
with it available. With a regular hub, only one can send and recieve
once. With a switch each node can be running @ full duplex, WITH A MAX OF
100 MBIT IN EACH DIRECTION AT THE SAME TIME.
mark vann wrote:
>
> I have setup a small network in my apartment. It consist of 5 PC's with
only
> one of them running linux ( my laptop ). I would like to setup a second
one
> to replace a 98 box running NAT32 ( a network address translation program
> running on 98 to distribute my only ip across the network ). Can someone
> tell me this,
> 1. What is the linux = to NAT32
> 2. Right now I am only getting 25-29 mbit a second of performance using
> either netgear 310 100mbit cards or 3com 905's 100mbit cards. Is this
going
> to improve running linux? Remeber that there is only 5 pc's running the
same
> brand cards full duplex through a switch. All test were conducted using
> tcp/ip file transfers on 2 machines at a time. It seems kinda low.
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bert)
Subject: Troubleshoot masquerading 'lag'
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 11:36:54 -0700
Hi All...
I'm new to linux and think i'm having some trouble with masquerading
dropping packets. (?)
I used to play Quake online WinNT with my cable modem. No problems.
I set up a linux machine and plugged it into my cable modem, then set up
WinNT to masquerade through linux. It was very easy to set up and works
great. However, I noticed that semi-periodically (about twice a minute)
packets are being lost as I play quake. [quake: connect to inet server
along with 10 other users and send/receive data. check network status
using 'netgraph 1' command] I am getting this packet loss on all quake
servers I try despite very low ping times. (~40ms)
Running ping on my linux machine and simultaneously on my WinNT shows
packets being lost for NT but not linux. (?) [again, about twice a
minute]
WinNT config has not changed since whole masquerading thing.
Linux is not running anything special... not even X... it just sits
around masquerading packets all day for my single WinNT computer!
I use hosts.deny (ALL:ALL) and hosts.allow, but don't think that should
be a big deal here.
This problems exists whether or not I use module /sbin/modprobe
ip_masq_quake (i dont' know what this is for... but i think it's only for
quake server 'cause my client works fine always)
Anyone know how I can troubleshoot this problem further? I'm getting
tired of the server telling me "while you were dropping packets, another
player killed you with a rocket launcher"!!! :)
Thanks,
Rudy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DNS Boggle
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 11:39:53 -0700
That's a question for your ISP, because they need to provide 'working' DNS
servers. But in general, if you don't need any specific name resolutions for
your network provided by your ISP, then you can use any DNS server to
resolve names. You can even setup your own DNS server (see DNS HOWTOs on
http://www.linux.org -->support
Good luck!
PS. I did try to use your ISP's DNS server 208.15.109.1 for my name
resolution and it worked fine...
=====Original Message=====
Andy wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Ok, well...
>I tried nslookup 208.15.109.1 my primary nameserver. It still hanged.
I
>can ping my name servers just fine tho. Then I added nameserver 198.6.1.1
to
>my /etc/resolv.conf and everything worked fine. (Ping, nslookup, and
netscape)
>
>Now I'm really confused...
> Andy
>
>
>Andrey Smirnov wrote:
>
>> You can try nslookup with IP address instead of the server name (try your
>> ISP's DNS server for example).
>>
>> But if your nslookup hangs even after that, you may have problem related
to
>> your routes or DNS in general.
>>
>> If routes are ok, then try using different DNS server (fi. UUNET's DNS -
>> 198.6.1.1)
>>
>> Good luck!
>
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Setting up a mail server on RH 6.0
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 11:48:11 -0700
Hello,
Try downloading and installing pop3 server from http://www.qualcomm.com
The popper3 server works great!
Good luck!
Jim Orfanakos wrote in message ...
>I have setup my Linux RH 6.0 system as a DNS serevr and a DHCP server...now
>I want to set it up as a mail server. I have another Linux RH 6.0
>workstation and a WIN 98 workstation that I am testing with.
>
>I have my own domain setup, and am testing with sending mail to:
>
>1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] from any host
>2) [EMAIL PROTECTED] from any host
>3) [EMAIL PROTECTED] from from any host
>4) user from any host
>
>Everything works fine if I use ELM or PINE from the Linux workstation or
the
>Linux server.
>
>The problem is that Netscape Messenger on the Linux server, Netscape
>Messenger on the Linux workstation, and Outlook Express on the WIN98
>workstation cannot establish a connection when sending and receiving mail.
>Actually....it appears that all will send, but none of them will receive.
>
>I suspect the problem is with POP3 / SMTP configuration on the RH 6.0
>server. Netscape and Outlook Express want a POP3 server for incoming mail,
>and a SMTP server for outgoing mail. The RH 6.0 Linuxconf tool for setting
>up a mail server only uses POP for the protocol. There is no separate
>incoming and separate outgoing protocol configuration, plus from the pull
>downs, Linuxconf only supports POP, SMTP, or UUCP.
>
>I want to set the mail server up so it can server any e-mail client.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Any ideas?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Jim, Monika and Sophia Orfanakos
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.orfanakos.com
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Richard A. Bilonick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Problem configuring PCMCIA Network card
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 18:43:56 GMT
Robert,
I'm in the same (or at least similar) boat. I have a Linksys Combo
PCMCIA EthernetCard which is a supported card. I have looked everywhere
for info on how to set up PCMCIA cards for networking but nothing I have
read has helped. I also have the strange problem that the cardinfo
command cannot be found anywhere. Both cardctl ident and cardctl status
give similar info to yours.
When I try to connect eth0 to a driver, no reasonable driver appears in
the list (I'm using Red Hat 6.0, BTW, on a Toshiba 2535 laptop.) From
what I've been able to gather, something called pcnet_cs is involved but
I don't know if this is a driver or not. It never shows up in the list
of drivers. My PCMCIA modem card works just fine so I know PCMCIA is
installed and working.
It doesn't seem that anyone else knows or if they know they are keeping
it secret. Why does it have to be this hard? I've gotten nowhere with
support at Red Hat so far.
I just got sound working. But to get it working I had to buy drivers
from 4Front ($20) but it was worth it! I'd surely pay $20 to get
networking through the PCMCIA card working!
If you find out anything useful, I would appreciate hearing about it.
Rick Bilonick
Robert Chung wrote:
> I am having trouble getting my PCMCIA ethernet card to work in Linux.
> It is EPX-10BT PC Card Ethernet 10BT from Eiger labs,Inc., and it is
> working well in Windows 95 and Windows NT. I am trying to add IP
> address to this device, and "ifconfig" is telling me there is no
> interface (I tried "eth0" for this device). I do not think my PCMCIA
> card has an interface name assigned to it. What should I do? Thank
> you in advance.
>
> PS: Below is output from "cardctl ident".
> This card is taking up Socket 1.
> Socket 0:
> product info: "SMS", "MM510 56K", "021", "A"
> manfid: 0x0013, 0x0000
> function: 2 (serial)
> Socket 1:
> product info: "Eiger labs,Inc.", "EPX-10BT PC Card Ethernet 10BT",
> "01"
> manfid: 0x0004, 0x2000
> function: 6 (network)
>
> ==============================================================
>
> Below is output from "cardctl status"
>
> Interface type is memory and I/O
> IRQ 3 is exclusive, level mode, enabled
> Speaker output is enabled
> Function 0:
> Config register base = 0x0200
> Option = 0x61, status = 0x08, pin = 0000, ext = 0000
> I/O window 1: 0x02f8 to 0x02ff, 8 bit
> Socket 1:
> Vcc = 5.0, Vpp1 = 5.0, Vpp2 = 5.0
--
==============================================================
Rick Bilonick - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Statistical Consulting for Business & Industry
==============================================================
"Where statistics help is as close as the Internet."
http://www.nauticom.net/users/rab/consult.htm
http://www.nauticom.net/users/rab/tutor.htm
http://www.nauticom.net/users/rab/bookstor.htm
------------------------------
From: Brian Witowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: more diald stuff
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 15:03:53 -0400
Gary,
My diald binary is in /usr/sbin. And it is a binary. I'm using Caldera 1.3 w/2.0.35
kernel. My init.d dir is in /etc/rc.d/. And my diald.conf is in /etc and my options
is in /etc/ppp as well as my 'connect' script.
The problem I have with 'diald up' is that it dials even if I don't need it to. Then
if it times out and hangs up due to no activity, it dials again. Even if I'm not on my
Win98 box. So thats one issue I need to resolve.
Another issue that maybe you can offer some help with is my commands to start my ip
masquerading. Every time I reboot my Linux server I have to reissue the commands
"ipfwadm -F -p deny" and "ipfwadm -F -a masquerade -S 192.168.1.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0". I
have tried putting these in /etc/rc.d/rc.local but it does'nt take effect. Either that
or something is happening afterwards that is taking it down before it's completly
booted.
With regard to netscape, I only run it on the Win98 box. My Linux box is pretty much a
server. But here is my dilad.conf.
debug 31
mode ppp
device /dev/modem
lock
dynamic
local 127.0.0.2
remote 127.0.0.3
defaultroute
crtscts
connect "chat -v -f /etc/ppp/ppp-on-dialer"
redial-timeout 1
fifo /etc/diald/dialroot wrote:
Thanks,
Brian
------------------------------
From: "Gregory D. Horne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP default route problems??
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 13:48:57 -0400
"Juan P. Ordonez" wrote:
> Hello
>
> I�m trying to hook up my pc to the internet using RH5,2. (Apollo
> Kernel 2.0.3-PPD 2.3.5) but I have experiencing problems, here are the
> symptoms:
> -I can establish a connection with the ISP succesfully
> -I can ping the ISP DNS server, ping the given IP address (dynamic IP)
> and the ISP remote computer
> -The DNS resolver works fine, any address get translated to its IP
> number.
> -I cannot get ping responses from any computer outside the ISP
> machines.
>
As root or super user (su), enter the following command at the
command-line prompt.
$ route
The default gateway should map to your ISP.
Also, what IP address are you using on your computer (not the dynamic IP
assigned by the ISP) - there are certain restrictions on IP addresses
used locally if your domain is not registered.
Let us know and then we can proceed with more assistant if needed.
Gregory D. Horne
Information Technology Architect
The Network Laboratorium (NetLab)
Ottawa ON
Canada
>
> According to various FAQ�s it looks like a default route
> problem, somehow the my pc cannot get past the ISP servers,has anyone
> experienced a similar problem? BTW my internet connection in W95 (on
> the same machine, same modem, different HDD) works ok.
> Any hypothesis for it?
>
> TIA
>
> JP
------------------------------
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn?= Ruberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.appletalk
Subject: Re: afpfs can be found here...
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 20:04:37 +0200
Kevin Cullis wrote:
[snip]
> P.S. Or see the attached file which was found at the above site.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Name: afpfs-1.0b2q2.tar.gz
> afpfs-1.0b2q2.tar.gz Type: Unix Tape Archive (application/x-tar)
> Encoding: x-uuencode
You seem to have ignored all the rules of good netiquette; you post
messages in HTML, making it impossible for quite a few people to read
your message, then you include a binary file in your message. Please
don't post messages like this on this newsgroup in the future.
--
Bj�rn Ruberg / http://traktor.nlh.no/beorn
Remove the .no_spam for my email address
"The more you scream the less you hear" * f i s h *
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
