Linux-Networking Digest #541, Volume #11 Tue, 15 Jun 99 13:13:43 EDT
Contents:
Changing telnetd port (Rusty Deschenes)
apache (alpine)
Remote Execution ("MicroNg")
Re: @home connection? (David Kennedy)
Linux with ISDN router ? Advice ?! (Jamie Allen)
Re: Squid does not work :(' ("YouDontKnowWho")
smbclient is slow (9 KB/s) one way, fast (3000 KB/s) the other ("Bob Glover")
Re: Terminal Program (Frank da Cruz)
Firewall/Proxy Server (Eric)
Re: Telnet/FTP Login Problems (Thomas Zajic)
Re: PPP Setup Question (Klea Dzonsons)
ncpfs is giving me an illegal instruction (James Peterson)
Re: (Q) Setting up ssh (Robert Lynch)
Re: How to interpret tcpdump? ("Cliff")
Re: Help with RedHat 5.2 LAN problem (James Peterson)
Re: Zmodem U/L to BBS (Bob Bernstein)
can't mount /usr over a diskless computer (Samuel AU)
Linux Client to Microsoft Network (Christopher New)
network interfaces won't activate (Luke Cyca)
Re: PPP and looped back serial line (Clifford Kite)
Re: S.A.T.A.N. (Lord Kano)
Re: PPP Problems (Clifford Kite)
Re: Diald keeps dialing... (Tim Kelley)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rusty Deschenes)
Subject: Changing telnetd port
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 12:36:27 GMT
Hi
I'd like the telnet deamon on my server to be running on a port other then 23.
How can i do it?
Will changing it in /etc/services will do it or do i need to change the code?
if so where is the file name that i should change? and once it is changed do i just
use gcc or make or?
If none of the above do, how else can i do it? (or if there is an easyer way).
(please send a cc to my mail address)
Thanks
--
Information, unlike trash, is of rare occurrence on the World Wide Web.
------------------------------
From: alpine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apache
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 07:45:00 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
does anyone know of any good documentation on apache
I have looked at there web sight and read most of the documentation
and I have also gone through the majority of the how to's
(I have not found one specifically for apache)
although I have found many that reference it many times
I'm having a hard time with the configuration
I get a ping response from my web server
but outside my network I get an error from the client web server "page
contains no data" and I have pages there on the root server and also
accounts
with the correct privileges set
any suggestions???
Alpine
------------------------------
From: "MicroNg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.programmer
Subject: Remote Execution
Date: 15 Jun 1999 12:46:11 GMT
Hi
Some question on remote execute hope your can help,
I want to use rsh for this purpose, (through dial-up, ppp connection
which have been done),
but the linux rsh only said "rsh remote-system-name linux-command" where
the login name and
password is not specified, and when I do testing,
1. if I don't make the .rhosts file is user home directory, -- acess denied
- OK undestand
2. if I put in, - wait infinite for this, why ?
Another question, how to skip a booting step in it cause infinite wait ? (
smbd cause this ) , which
never go though ( and I have to resolve REINSTALL the whole Linux, god )
Thank,
--
NO UCE
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Kennedy)
Subject: Re: @home connection?
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 13:05:19 GMT
I have redhat 5.2 working with DHCP but for kernel 2.0.36 (default RH
5.2 kernel?)
Not that hard. I can give you more details if you decide to do it and
are having problems.
I spent the extra time to get the DHCP working so @home would not
contact me for any 'issues' of using a static address when I should
have been DHCP.
On Tue, 15 Jun 1999 01:39:42 GMT, brooks dobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>has anyone used linux with @home's cable modems? if so any advice?
>
>thanks,
>brooks
>
------------------------------
From: Jamie Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux with ISDN router ? Advice ?!
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 21:43:13 GMT
Greetings
We have a small LAN here of Win 95 machines, with an ISDN router on the
network. The router is set as the default gateway on the windows
machines, and this works easily and effectively.
I have now installed linux on one of the machines, and would like it to
access the internet in a similar way.
Is there a howto for configuring a network in this way ? Has anyone done
it, and know the pitfalls ? How do I set up the rooting, and is there
any danger of the linux machine demanding a dial-up every couple of
minutes during the night ?! And is there any smart software that might
be able to tell me whether the router is online or not ???
Any help or advice with this would be greatly appreciated !
Thank you.
Cheers
Jamie.
------------------------------
From: "YouDontKnowWho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Squid does not work :('
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 13:50:08 GMT
If you don't mind telling me, what is squid?
--
And now we return to our regularly scheduled,
uncommonly entertaining thread...
Maguai wrote in message ...
check this site
http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai/
You don't need inetd.conf for squid. There a file called
squid.conf in your /etc directory. 3128 is default port number and
you can change them in squid.conf file.
Ollivier Civiol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,
I'm trying to make the Squid proxy work but I can't, I'm not
even sure that it's running, shouldn't there be a line in inetd.con
that starts it ?
Thanks
--
Best Regards,
Ollivier Civiol
=============================================
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EmailXpress : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WEB pages : http://www.astecsoft.com/AstecWeb
------------------------------
From: "Bob Glover" <app1rtg_at_air.ups.com>
Subject: smbclient is slow (9 KB/s) one way, fast (3000 KB/s) the other
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 13:19:59 +0100
I have an situation with a Win95 box and a computer running Red Hat Linux
5.2 (with kernel 2.2.4, if that makes a difference). smbclient transfers
from the Wintendo proceed at about 3000K/s, but transfers to the Windows box
get about 9 K/s. smbmount'ed shares have the same problem. This is on a
single segment network with a LinkSys 10/100 hub in between.
I use smbclient like so: smbclient //winpc/c -N
I've seen posts from other people with this same problem, but I've never
seen a response. Any ideas?
Thanks for any help!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank da Cruz)
Subject: Re: Terminal Program
Date: 15 Jun 1999 13:55:16 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
John Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Stefan Traber wrote:
: > i'm looking for a terminal program for Linux which is scriptable (like
: > Telix for Windows).
:
: Try C-Kermit:
:
http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/ck70.html
: ...from the kermit project at Columbia University:
:
http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/
It's a scriptable terminal program that can make serial connections
(direct or dialed) and TCP/IP network connections, and can transfer files.
- Frank
------------------------------
From: Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Firewall/Proxy Server
Date: 15 Jun 1999 14:30:48 GMT
I am a newbie and have recently been asked to research setting up a
firewall/proxy server to restrict access to certain sites from our office
users and dial up users. We currently are running an NT domain with a T1
connection. Our proposed firewall/proxy is running Redhat 6.0. I am not
sure whether to use IP chains or whether there is an aplication for
download that will make it easier. I am looking for step-by-step
instructions. Right now everyone connects to the internet through a
gateway on our LAN. Any help would be appreciated.
Thank you,
Eric
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Zajic)
Subject: Re: Telnet/FTP Login Problems
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 14:33:51 GMT
On Tue, 15 Jun 1999 10:16:19 +0100, Mike Kuht wrote:
> Has anyone got a clue what might be happening here ?
> I can Telnet/FTP into my Linux box either remotely from
> a Win95 session or locally via the loopback interface, both say
> they have connected. HOWEVER neither Telnet or FTP respond immediately
> with the expected 'Login:' prompt, if I wait 1 or 2 minutes the 'Login'
> prompt finally appears and I can login normally and use the session.
> Any ideas what could be causing the delay ?
> Many Thanks
You have the same problem that roughly 2 million users already
had before you, all of them posting the same question here. The
questions (and answers, of course ;-) have been stored here for
your convenience:
http://www.deja.com
Hint #1: Try using IP numbers instead of hostnames
Hint #2: DNS is used for translating hostnames to IPs
Hint #3: Linux uses the following files for DNS configuration:
/etc/resolv.conf
/etc/host.conf
/etc/hosts
/etc/HOSTNAME
HTH,
Thomas
--
=--- Thomas Zajic aka ZlatkO ThE GoDFatheR, Vienna/Austria ---=
=-- "It is not easy to cut through a human head with a hacksaw." M.C. --=
=-- Posted with Free Agent 1.11/32 running on Linux 2.0.36/Wine-990226 --=
=--- Spam-proof e-mail: thomas(DOT)zajic(AT)teleweb(DOT)at ---=
------------------------------
From: Klea Dzonsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP Setup Question
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 12:20:24 +0930
kama wrote:
> What are you running, RedHat, SuSE, KDE, Gnome?
Red Hat 6.0, KDE and Gnome
>
>
> Klea Dzonsons wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Ive worked out why I cant get my linux box to connect to my server.
> > My ISP uses WindozeNT!
> >
> > Does anyone know of any FAQs or HOWTOS on setting up a connection to a
> > Windoze server?
> > Is this possible at all?
> >
> > Please Help!
> >
> > thanks in advance
> > Klea Dzonsons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: James Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ncpfs is giving me an illegal instruction
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 09:56:46 -0500
I compiled and have ncpfs on my debian linux box... but every time I try
to mount a novell volume I get an error saying Illegal instruction....
Has anyone came across this.. if so what is causing it?
Please email me.
--
*****************************************
James Peterson
Network Administrator
Roman Meal Milling Company, Inc
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*****************************************
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 08:39:12 -0700
From: Robert Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: (Q) Setting up ssh
Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> There seems a lack of decent documentation on setting up ssh.
> The man page tells you there are 4 places ssh looks for authorisation,
> but does not tell you in what order it looks at these.
> In fact it is pretty useless for this purpose.
>
> --
> Timothy Murphy
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> tel: +353-1-2842366
> s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
I found the page "Getting started with SSH":
http://www.tac.nyc.ny.us/~kim/ssh/
rather helpful in this regard.
HTH. Bob L.
--
Robert Lynch-Berkeley CA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.best.com/~rmlynch/
------------------------------
From: "Cliff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to interpret tcpdump?
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 22:15:01 GMT
John Zbesko wrote in message ...
> [snip]
>How do I interpret the following tcpdump lines?
>
>21:29:16.017440 old386.33355 > zbesko.linux.netbios-ssn: P 919:1000(81) ack
2111995156 win 1024
>
timestamp sender.port > receiver.port: P(ush flag set)
octet_offset_start:octet_offset_end(number_of_octets) ack(nowledged)
ack_sequence_number receive_window_size
>21:29:16.035709 zbesko.linux.netbios-ssn > old386.33355: . ack 81 win 31744
(DF)
>
Same idea, just the other way round.
>Where can I find documentation on what these lines are saying? Thanks for
>your help.
>
Try "man tcpdump" from a command line.
The only thing that looks vaguely suspicous is the receive window size
that the linux box is sending back to the dos box. It is not out of the
ordinary, rather it is close to 32K -- a magical number in dos. Maybe there
is a bug in the dos TCP/IP stack? Have you tried the MS Knowledge Base?
www.microsoft.com/support I think.
--
-Cliff
Views expressed are my own and not necessarily those of my employer
Concordia Net, Inc. When replying via email please use; cwheat at concordia
dot net not
root@localhost
------------------------------
From: James Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help with RedHat 5.2 LAN problem
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 10:08:11 -0500
you forgot to add your default route
route add default gw xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have installed RedHat 5.2 Secure-Server Edition on an old 486 box
> installed as a server. I have an SMC ISA card (EZ Card 10) installed.
> This is connected to a D-Link hub set to 10BaseT setting (it's a dual
> speed). The two other computers on the network are running Win98 with
> NetBEUI and TCP/IP protocols. PROBLEM: I can't ping the Linux box from
> the Win 98 boxes and I cannot telnet into the Linux box.
>
> ifconfig reads:
>
> Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:29:35:EE:F4
> inet addr: 192.168.1.1 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:30 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0
> Interrupt:10 Base address:0x300
>
> netstat -nr reads:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt iface
> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0 eth0
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0 lo
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.254 0.0.0.0 UG 1500 0 0 eth0
>
> Any ideas of why I can't ping the Linux box would be appreciated.
>
> Russ
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
--
*****************************************
James Peterson
Network Administrator
Roman Meal Milling Company, Inc
Phone (701) 282-9656
Fax (701) 282-9743
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*****************************************
------------------------------
From: Bob Bernstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Zmodem U/L to BBS
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 22:21:45 GMT
I'm observing some odd behaviour exchanging QWK reply packets via zmodem with
a local BBS. This is a Linux system, running C-Kermit.
I see the same behaviour if I use minicom, but I want to stick to using
Kermit, and my guess's I have a better chance of fixing this if I do.
Problem: there's a long pause between sending the .rep packet and the BBS
deciding to unzip it, and the pause includes the BBS sending what I interpret
to be more requests for the zmodem upload to commence. The packet gets sent
immediately when I issue the command 'send chowda.rep', but it seems the board
doesn't know I through sending. Here's a screen shot of a typical session:
--- snip ---
wcMAIL main menu
Commands: [D]ownload QWK packet
[U]pload REP packet
[Y]our settings
[H]elp with wcMAIL
[Q]uit back to ChowdaNet BBS
[G]oodbye, log off
wcMAIL command? [U]
Start your Zmodem upload of CHOWDA.REP now...
**B0100000027fed4
(Back at CX123456-Z)
====================================================
(/home/ruptured-duck/mmail/up/) C-Kermit>send chowda.rep
Sending: /home/ruptured-duck/mmail/up/chowda.rep
Bytes Sent: 391 BPS:0
(/home/ruptured-duck/mmail/up/) C-Kermit>c
Connecting to /dev/ttyS0, speed 38400.
The escape character is Ctrl-\ (ASCII 28, FS)
Type the escape character followed by C to get back,
or followed by ? to see other options.
====================================================
**B0887010000b908
**B0887010000b908
File transfer upload successful.
Unpacking CHOWDA.REP with PKUNZIP...
Conf: CHOWDANET General Di To: JOHN REILLEY Subj: Re: hello world
1 reply uploaded
wcMAIL main menu
Commands: [D]ownload QWK packet
[U]pload REP packet
[Y]our settings
[H]elp with wcMAIL
[Q]uit back to ChowdaNet BBS
[G]oodbye, log off
wcMAIL command? [G]
--- snip ---
When I reconnect with the BBS after doing the send, things just sit there
for a looong time as those two additional '**B000......' strings get sent.
--
Bob Bernstein
at
Esmond, Rhode Island, USA
------------------------------
From: Samuel AU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: can't mount /usr over a diskless computer
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 00:05:44 +0800
I'm running RedHat 6.0 and etherboot 4.2.1.
I can't mount /usr or /home over a diskless computer. The error message
is
permission denied.
Thanks
Samuel
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 02:07:52 +1000
From: Christopher New <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux Client to Microsoft Network
My goal is to connect Linux to our NT Server requiring the following
configuration on an Windows 9x machine ....
* Login : Client for Microsoft Network
* Protocol : TCP/IP
* Other : MS Proxy Client
We are required to login to the Proxy client in order to get Web access
........
This is done at startup not in a web browser........
The system allows us to browse the network neighbourhood........
I am aware that Samba may solve some of my problems but I am concerned
with the logging into the Proxy Client .....
Any advice or assistants would be greatly appreciated ..... ( If I have
not provided enough information please let me know )
Thanks in advance
Christopher New
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luke Cyca)
Subject: network interfaces won't activate
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 16:17:27 -0600
I have been having a lot of trouble getting my ethernet card to work. It
seems to be configured right. It seems fine in the startup log. but
everytime I look in netcfg, both it (eth0) and the lookback interface are
inactive. I click activate for both of them and then they say they are
active. I save, quit, open netcfg again, and they are both inactive
again. Please help.
Please reply by email.
Thanks.
-Luke
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: PPP and looped back serial line
Date: 15 Jun 1999 11:09:20 -0500
Spudly ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: This is the output from /var/log/messages after I started up pppd (to connect
: to my ISP):
: Jun 15 11:05:45 vincent chat[371]: timeout set to 5 seconds
: Jun 15 11:05:45 vincent chat[371]: send (AT&FM1^M)
: Jun 15 11:05:45 vincent chat[371]: expect (OK)
: Jun 15 11:05:45 vincent chat[371]: AT&FM1^M^M
: Jun 15 11:05:45 vincent chat[371]: OK
: Jun 15 11:05:45 vincent chat[371]: -- got it
: Jun 15 11:05:45 vincent chat[371]: send (ATDT84250056^M)
: Jun 15 11:05:45 vincent chat[371]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
: Jun 15 11:05:45 vincent pppd[370]: Serial connection established.
: Jun 15 11:05:45 vincent chat[371]: abort on (BUSY)
: Jun 15 11:05:45 vincent chat[371]: abort on (NO DIALTONE)
: Jun 15 11:05:45 vincent chat[371]: abort on (WAITING)
: Jun 15 11:05:45 vincent chat[371]: timeout set to 45 seconds
: Jun 15 11:05:46 vincent pppd[370]: Using interface ppp0
: Jun 15 11:05:46 vincent pppd[370]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/cua0
: Jun 15 11:05:50 vincent pppd[370]: Serial line is looped back.
: Jun 15 11:05:50 vincent pppd[370]: Connection terminated.
: Jun 15 11:05:51 vincent pppd[370]: Exit.
: It's a bit lengthy I know, but as you can see it says "Serial connection
: established" before the number has been dialed! It then tells me that the
: "serial line is looped back" after connecting ppp0 to /dev/cua0 (somehow). I
You need to add, at the very least, the expect/send CONNECT '\d\c'
after the telephone number in the chat script. If chat uses the -f
option to specify a separate file for the chat expect/sends then use
CONNECT \d\c instead. This is if you configured for PAP or CHAP
authentication.
If the ISP needs a login/password entered instead (not many do these
days) then you have to add those before the CONNECT expect/send plus
anything extra that may be needed to start PPP at the ISP. Minicom is
your friend in this case.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* 97.3% of all statistics are made up. */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lord Kano)
Subject: Re: S.A.T.A.N.
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 12:13:30 -0400
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Frank Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi all!
>I am trying to get satan up and running, and I think I need some help :D
>
>When I start satan I get the main html page in netscape,
>but, when I click on "Satan Target Selection" It asks me to save the
>file.
>I think that this is a Netscape issue, but I'm not sure, because
>I had some trouble compiling the items in the "src/boot/" dir.
>(I'm not sure if this has anything to do with it, or if it's just a
>setting
>in netscape that needs to be made....
>
>Any help would be appreciated.
>
>thanks!
>
>-Frank
If you're running RedHat and the SATAN rpm there is a file in the satan
directory that details how to get around this.
LK
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PPP Problems
Date: 15 Jun 1999 10:55:30 -0500
Mick Farmer (mick@penguin) wrote:
: Jun 15 11:33:04 penguin pppd[7881]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x10
<mru 1500> <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x2e57e4ae>]
: Jun 15 11:33:04 penguin pppd[7881]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x10
<mru 1500> <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x2e57e4ae>]
: Jun 15 11:33:04 penguin pppd[7881]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1
<magic 0x6378383d>]
: Jun 15 11:33:04 penguin pppd[7881]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1
<addr 193.61.29.127>]
: Jun 15 11:33:31 penguin last message repeated 9 times
: Jun 15 11:33:34 penguin pppd[7881]: IPCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
I'd try two things. Check that the UART configured in Linux is the
UART that the modem actually uses. " setserial /dev/ttyS0 " A 16550A
UART and a 16550 UART are not the same. You should also try matching
the ISPs ACCM request (asyncmap) with the pppd option <asyncmap 0> .
If you want to save on disk space then you can drop the pppd option
<kdebug 7> which is seldom needed to debug PPP and makes reading the
logs harder.
When you get things working try removing the pppd option <novj> , VJ
header compression helps speed up the PPP link. I'd suggest adding
a pppd speed option since otherwise pppd defaults to 9600 . You can
try 19200 with a 16450 UART and 115200 with a 16550A UART.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* The signal-to-noise ratio is too low in many [news] groups to make
* them good candidates for archiving.
* --- Mike Moraes, Answers to FAQs about Usenet */
------------------------------
From: Tim Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Diald keeps dialing...
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 10:35:56 -0500
Gilford Wimbley wrote:
> The problem is not with diald per se, but with windows95. My
> windows95 machine, even when it is sitting there doing nothing, sends
> out packets every fifteen minutes on the nose. I believe that they
> are DNS packets, and I never found a way to ignore them using diald.
> Now I have a full-time connection and I don't care about the packets.
fwiw, tcpdump will let you know exactly what is going on ...
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
