Linux-Networking Digest #579, Volume #11 Fri, 18 Jun 99 11:13:53 EDT
Contents:
odd route behaviour (Frederik Orispaa)
Re: "Seeing" a WinNT40 box from SuSE 6.1 (M. Buchenrieder)
Where I can download RedHat? ("Importadora Americana")
Re: sendmail configuration ("Steve Cowles")
Wrong filesize in win thoug samba????? ("Michel Arendsen")
AW: ipfwadm (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Peter_H=E4ufel?=)
ipfwadm Question (Holger Burde)
Re: Realtek RTL8019 network card ??? (Alan Chapman)
Re: HP LaserJet 5L + Linux + Samba + Sleep Mode (Rob Clark)
Re: ipfwadm (Lew Pitcher)
default gateway. (HellNo)
AW: SMB samba shares not being seen by everyone???? (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Peter_H=E4ufel?=)
virtual host in RH 5.2 ("chanwk")
Re: ppp connection (leam)
Re: Multiple domains one box separate accounts (Jonathan Guthrie)
Re: Nagel algorithm?? (Mike Jagdis)
Firewall and masq (terry tashiro)
Re: Question: ipportfw (Greg Weeks)
Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (Jonathan Guthrie)
Re: Boot ROMs - what hardware? ("Damon J. Rygiewicz")
Internet Monitoring ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: USR ISA 28.8 (Clifford Kite)
2 ethernet cards in RH6. Not as easy as it sounds! ("Chris")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frederik Orispaa)
Subject: odd route behaviour
Date: 18 Jun 1999 11:12:33 GMT
My route.conf works fine, except one line.
i have a bunch of stuff along the lines of:
123.123.123.123 the.gw.IP.number the.netmask the.dev
and they all work. but then one line:
1.0.8.0 its.gw.IP.number 255.255.255.0 eth1
doesnt get installed. i cant remember the exact error message during boot,
(and i cant get to it without booting this machine which i cant do right
now for various reasons), but the funny thing is, instantly after boot up
i can execute the same exact line with:
route add -net 1.0.8.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw its.gw.number
and it works perfectly.
what could be the problem, that it refuses to do it at boot time as it
should, yet it works perfectly fine after booting?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: "Seeing" a WinNT40 box from SuSE 6.1
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 06:52:05 GMT
"Michael R. Clapper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>So how do I see the drives on these machines? (both ways). I'd like to
>mount an NT drive from Linux, and vice-versa.
[...]
Windows networks require SAMBA on the Linux machine(s) .
With NT4.0, you'll additionally need smbpasswd (part of the SAMBA
package) for to get encrypted passwords (which the NT box uses
per default) working.
Michael
--
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
Note: If you want me to send you email, don't munge your address.
------------------------------
From: "Importadora Americana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Where I can download RedHat?
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 07:40:47 -0300
I've decided to get RedHat (download), but I don't know what directories
should I take. When I enter on redhat ftp or on their mirrors, thereis a lot
of directories that I cannot know what of them I must download to install
RedHat.
If someone have any ideas, please send me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you all.
cya
------------------------------
From: "Steve Cowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: sendmail configuration
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 11:28:21 GMT
Look for the following entry in your sendmail.cf file and modifiy it to the
following:
# who I masquerade as (null for no masquerading) (see also $=M)
DMbogle.co.nz
This tells sendmail to re-address (masquarade) your outbound emails from
@host.domain.com to @domain.com. BTW: You will need to restart sendmail for
this change to take effect.
Gib Bogle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have a similar problem (maybe the same). I had sendmail/RH4.2 working
> fine, but recently installed RH6.0 and sendmail now creates problems. I
> connect to the internet via a dialup, but have registered a domain name
> (bogle.co.nz). sendmail runs on the machine called "wem1", and my email
> goes out with "Mail from: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Some mail servers
> bounce it back, saying "Server domain must exist", because although
> is known, wem1.bogle.co.nz is not. I have tried setting
> everything I know about (and a few more besides) in sendmail.cf to say
> that my mail is coming from @bogle.co.nz, but the "Mail from:" field
> resolutely insists on @wem1.bogle.co.nz. What should I do? Is it a
> matter of recompiling sendmail, or is there another way around this?
>
------------------------------
From: "Michel Arendsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Wrong filesize in win thoug samba?????
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 11:58:51 +0200
hi to all of you,
When I select in windows (thoug samba) my entire Linux hd (he is 730 mb) en
then ask Linux for the propeties he counts up to 2,4 GB and more!!!!
whats wrong here??
Greetings
Michel Arendsen
------------------------------
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Peter_H=E4ufel?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: AW: ipfwadm
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 10:10:22 +0200
You should use ipchain for the function of a firewall.
If you are using SuSE Linux 6.1 you just have a look
in you PPP-Up script. There you can find an example how
to use ipfwadm.
A very good discription can be find at the web site of=20
heise verlag. But it is written in german.
No problem for you, I guess ;-)
Mit freundlichen Gruessen
> Peter Haeufel
> Dipl.-Ing.
> Systemberater
> _____________________________________________
> InfoConcept GmbH
> CompetenceCenter f=FCr Netze und Betriebssysteme
> M=F6rscher Str. 17-25
> 76275 Ettlingen=09
> Fon.: 07243/5380-33
> Fax.: 07243/5380-99
> EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.InfoConcept.com
>=20
Gesch=E4ftsstellen: M=FCnchen - Stuttgart - Ulm - Heilbronn - Kaiserslauter=
n
=====Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht=====
Von: Stephan M. Ott // OKDesign oHG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 17. Juni 1999 08:05
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: ipfwadm
Hi folks,
can anyone point me to a URL with good Infos about the usage of ipfwadm ?
Thank you in advance
--- Stephan
------------------------------
From: Holger Burde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ipfwadm Question
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 13:13:02 +0100
Hi;
I try to aditional secure a webserver with ipfwadm. The machine as 3 IPs
bound to _one_ interface and
what i want is filtering request in such a way that IP_1 allows
(dns,www, etc in/out) IP_2 (..) IP_3(..) and nothing else.
I tried dozends of configurations but allways ending with nothing
getting through. Perhaps i try something which
is not supported at all by ipfwadm (something similar works on Solaris
with ipfilter 3.x.y) ???
Anyone succseded with something similar ?????
hb
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan Chapman)
Subject: Re: Realtek RTL8019 network card ???
Date: 18 Jun 1999 10:08:07 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dmitry Koshkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I am wondering if I can install the network card with RTL8019 chip on
>Redhat 6.0.
>What driver should I use for this.
>Where can I get this driver.
This is supported in the standard kernel sources. Whether it is included in
any of the RedHat Kernels I don't know.
>From the Ethernet-HOWTO:
5.31.3. RealTek 8019
Status: Supported, Driver Name: ne (+8390)
This is a Plug and Pray version of the above. Use the DOS software to
disable PnP and enable jumperless configuration; set the card to a
sensible I/O address and IRQ and you should be ready to go. (If using
the driver as a module, don't forget to add an io=0xNNN option to
/etc/conf.modules). The rset8019.exe program can be obtained from
RealTek's WWW site at http://www.realtek.com.tw - or via ftp from the
same site.
Alan.
--
+=========================================+
| Alan Chapman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| URL: http://www.cix.co.uk/~welsh-cob/ |
+=========================================+
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.periphs.printers,comp.sys.hp.hardware
Subject: Re: HP LaserJet 5L + Linux + Samba + Sleep Mode
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rob Clark)
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 11:55:01 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Casey McGinty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ok, heres a quick question:
>
>I have a HP LaserJet 5L connected to a Linux server running Samba. I
>have 2 other Win98 machines that I have printing to the LaserJet 5L.
>The slight problem I am having is that if I send a print job to the
>laserJet when it is in sleep mode, the printer stops, and all three
>display lights come on. To fix this I have to unplug the printer and
>then plug it back in. The printer comes back to life and then will
>spit out the pages i was trying to print, only they are filled with
>junk.
According to my 5L manual, all three lights means a hardware error that
requires calling HP support. This doesn't sound like a Samba-related
problem: what happens if you print directly from the Linux machine?
Rob Clark, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.o2.net/~gromitkc/winmodem.html
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lew Pitcher)
Subject: Re: ipfwadm
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 12:01:01 GMT
Try http://www.xos.nl/linux/ipfwadm/
On Thu, 17 Jun 1999 08:04:40 +0200, "Stephan M. Ott // OKDesign oHG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hi folks,
>can anyone point me to a URL with good Infos about the usage of ipfwadm ?
>
>Thank you in advance
>
>--- Stephan
>
>
Lew Pitcher
System Consultant, Integration Solutions Architecture
Toronto Dominion Bank
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(Opinions expressed are my own, not my employer's.)
------------------------------
From: HellNo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: default gateway.
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 11:11:24 GMT
Can anyone help me?
I would like to setup my network from the command line. RH tends to
push you to the graphical interface but I would like to know how to do
it from the command line.
I can't find the files nor can I find the commands to use. I don't
want the solution on a plate, just pointers.
If you can help, I'd appreciate.
Thanks
Ed.
--
HellNo
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 21535717
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Peter_H=E4ufel?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: AW: SMB samba shares not being seen by everyone????
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 13:26:23 +0200
Hey,=20
which kind of authentication are you using? /share/user/domain
Do you use the browseable feature for your share?
One thing to get more information why a connection is not
established is the usage of higher debug level.
Try=20
log level =3D 3
log file =3D /var/log/smb.log
in you smb.conf file.
If the information you are looking for is not in the
logfile increase the log level to 4,5 or 100.
Be careful of the usage of log level =3D 100 because you can
see the passwords used for this connection.
Do not forget to delete the log entries in the smb.conf after
your "trace"!=20
Mit freundlichen Gruessen
> Peter Haeufel
> Dipl.-Ing.
> Systemberater
> _____________________________________________
> InfoConcept GmbH
> CompetenceCenter f=FCr Netze und Betriebssysteme
> M=F6rscher Str. 17-25
> 76275 Ettlingen=09
> Fon.: 07243/5380-33
> Fax.: 07243/5380-99
> EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.InfoConcept.com
>=20
Gesch=E4ftsstellen: M=FCnchen - Stuttgart - Ulm - Heilbronn - Kaiserslauter=
n
=====Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht=====
Von: Robert Chapman Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 17. Juni 1999 11:25
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: SMB samba shares not being seen by everyone????
Hi all... I have a network with a RH Linux 6.0 server, and is running samba=
=20
with several shares setup. The problem that I'm having is that some of the=
=20
users on the same subnet can not see the shares or the server at all.
Several of the newer computers that I have setup all can see it just fine.=
.
Anyone know if maybe the drivers of the individual computer might be a=20
problem. Most of the NIC's are 3Com and most are running Win95 osr2. Have
the=20
NIC drivers changed recently????
Thanks in advance...
Robert Chapman
------------------------------
From: "chanwk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: virtual host in RH 5.2
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 21:05:27 +0800
How to set up the virtual host in RH 5.2?
I can ping the virtual host remotely. But nothing can be seen in the browser
after typing the virtual host or ip.
------------------------------
From: leam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ppp connection
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 08:23:39 -0500
The same problem happens in the USA, maybe because I don't remember much
Italian or German. :)
Had the same problem, solved it by using "wvdial". Pages 142-144 in the
SuSE 6.1 manual.
ciao!
leam
Michel Roux wrote:
>
> I'm not sure that this will help: I did that on my system (SuSE 6.0) prior
> to using kppp, to have a ppp script working. When using kppp, the message
> "the ppp deamon died unexpectedly"
> also pops up, though the script works fine for any user.
> SUID and GUID are also set on kppp.
> It seems that there are a lot of messages reporting this problem in the news
> (especially on german an italian newsgroup) but I could not find yet a way
> to have kppp work when non root (may be because I don't speak german or
> italian...)
>
> Michel roux
--
Leam Hall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bloated.com/~gershom/index.html
------------------------------
From: Jonathan Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Multiple domains one box separate accounts
Date: 18 Jun 1999 12:51:17 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jonathan:
> Thanks for your reply. I am going for http, ftp, pop3, and smtp.
http is handled easily by Apache
ftp is handled easily by proftpd
Virtual hosts in smtp can be configured in either smail or Sendmail with
varying levels of difficulty. I understand that q***l can do it, to.
I've never been satisfied with the sendmail solution.
pop3 is the problem. I have a kit somewhere that allows you to do that,
but it's been back-burnered and now I've forgotten where I got it.
--
Jonathan Guthrie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Brokersys +281-895-8101 http://www.brokersys.com/
12703 Veterans Memorial #106, Houston, TX 77014, USA
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Jagdis)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Nagel algorithm??
Date: 18 Jun 1999 13:44:36 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <7kbfh8$esi$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, bill davidsen wrote:
>To repeat the original question, short of editing the config file by
>hand, does this option appear in any of the "make *config" menus? I
>said I was willing to do it by hand, but I thought it was originally in
>a config menu. The "say N here" doesn't make much sense unless you get
>the chance to say anything.
>[...]
>If I hadn't done enough network hacking to know there was such a thing
>and why I wanted to use it, I probably would never have found it.
The no nagle config option no long exists and probably the rogue
ifdef check should no longer exist either. Nagle is automatically
turned off on a per socket basis if you set the TCP_NODELAY
socket option on the socket. Turning nagle off globally is a
bit drastic in most cases.
Mike
--
A train stops at a train station, a bus stops at a bus station.
On my desk I have a work station...
.----------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Mike Jagdis | Internet: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Roan Technology Ltd. | |
| 2 Markham Mews, Broad Street | Telephone: +44 118 989 0403 |
| Wokingham ENGLAND | Fax: +44 118 989 1195 |
`----------------------------------------------------------------------'
------------------------------
From: terry tashiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Firewall and masq
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 14:57:11 +0100
Hi all,
I am thinking of setting up firewall, masq and NAT with kernel 2.2.10.
I have been looking into the sites related to those and found them
confusing.
First of all, is it possible to have NAT(1:1) and masq(1:n) on a Linux
box?
Secondly, it is not easy to tell which is better, ipchain or ipfwadm.
Which is better?
Could anyone post some example configuration for, at least, firewall and
masq that works with kernel 2.2.x, using either ipchain or ipfwadm.
Many thanks in advance.
Terry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Weeks)
Subject: Re: Question: ipportfw
Crossposted-To: comp.security.firewalls
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 08:39:26 -0500
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Carl Filpo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am trying to forward everything for port 80 on a debian 2.1 box running
> 2.0.36 kernel.
>
> Have a web server on a Win98 host 192.168.0.9 that is functioning correctly.
>
> I issue the command on the linux box with ip 192.168.0.20:
>
> ipportfw -A -t 192.168.0.20/80 -R 192.168.0.9/80
The first IP address should be the address for the external
interface. It should be a real IP address and not an internal one.
> Nothing happens when i connect using the web browser to 192.168.0.20 -
> doesn't connect.
> Even when I try and forward port 10222 say to port 80 on the windows box
> doesn't work either entering :10222 after the URL.
You will also need to make your connection from outside the
firewall. The forwarding uses the Masq code so it will not reflect
connections from inside back inside.
> Is there anything else I have to enable to get ipportfw to work ? Here is
> what I get with an ipportfw -L
>
> Prot Local Addr/Port > Remote Addr/Port
>
> TCP 192.168.0.20/80 > 192.168.0.9/80
It looks like everthing is compiled in and working ok if the
forwarding is set up right.
Greg Weeks
--
http://durendal.tzo.com/greg/
------------------------------
From: Jonathan Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark?
Date: 18 Jun 1999 12:56:31 GMT
In comp.os.linux.networking Stuart Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Moritz Moeller-Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> Well, this is not a theory but has been proven in court. Several articles
>> detailed this. Your own company, Microsoft admitted that this code exists!
>> inded!
> Yes, because they couldn't be sure that DR-DOS would support Windows. And I
> believe the code was removed in the final release...
If all they're wanting to do is a CYA maneuver, why encrypt the code?
Why test for stuff that Windows itself doesn't need? You say that you
think it was removed, well, if the AARD code was so darned innocent, why
remove it? It was disableable, you know? Usually, you don't make ANY
significant changes between the final beta version and the release
version. I've been in situations where a customer wouldn't even let me
change the version number to remove the beta indicator.
No matter where you stand on this issue, I think you can agree that
reasonable people might conclude that Microsoft certainly acted guilty, in
this case, whether or they were guilty of any untoward behavior or not.
--
Jonathan Guthrie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Brokersys +281-895-8101 http://www.brokersys.com/
12703 Veterans Memorial #106, Houston, TX 77014, USA
------------------------------
From: "Damon J. Rygiewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Boot ROMs - what hardware?
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 08:18:45 -0500
I've been working on the same problem...but I've found some reasonable
answers. As for a burner, I bought the cheap model, the MCT-MEP-1C from JDR
Microdevices (http://www.jdr.com) for $129.99. For generic cards (like the
CNet I got), I bought 8k 150ns EPROMs (JDR #2764A-150) for $4.99 each. The
images in the Etherboot package labeled *.lzrom are compressed and fit on an
8k EPROM, however, the *.rom require a 16k EPROM, which will fit on most net
cards. If you e-mail JDR tech support with your question and card model,
they should have an answer too (and hopefully it will match mine :-) Hope
this information in useful.
Damon
Chris Harshman wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I've been looking for this answer for a while, and still
>no joy. Hopefully someone out there can assist - I need
>to get this equipment purchased! (I've been to the
>Etherboot page.)
>
>We're using a collection of ISA and PCI NE2000-compatible
>generic Ethernet cards (along with a handful of SMC Ultra16
>8216T's) on Linux workstations. We need to start booting
>these diskless from our PII server in the corner. All the
>cards have sockets that look identical, at least in terms
>of pin-outs and physical dimensions.
>
>What hardware specifically will we need to accomplish this?
>Which EPROM chips? Which burner? (If you could supply the
>name of a vendor, and SKU or part numbers, it would be a
>tremendous help.)
>
>Thank you very much in advance for any assistance you might
>be able to render.
>
>Yours,
>Chris
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Internet Monitoring
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 13:05:13 GMT
anyone know of an internet monitoring package for Linux... using Little
Brother on NT now and I'm tired of rebooting it every other week and
losing my stats.....
thanx..
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: USR ISA 28.8
Date: 18 Jun 1999 09:03:55 -0500
joe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Hehe. Actually, I mistyped the rc.serial line in my last post. the line
: actually reads "setserial /dev/ttyS0 irq 4 port 0x3f8" so I'm calling for
: the correct device. However, and this is odd (or maybe not), I can bring up
: a terminal and run "setserial /dev/ttyS0" and it brings up the correct irq,
: port, and even reports the uart. When I then try to connect via kppp, it
: again reports "sorry, the modem is not ready." I can bring up the
: miniterminal and select "modem...reset" ( I cannot type any AT commands int
: the miniterminal window) and at the bottom is says "modem ready" but after
: that it again reports that the modem is not ready.
You could try involking setserial in rc.serial with it's full pathname,
that's /sbin/setserial here.
Could there be two setserials? Since it works from the command line,
do "which setserial" to see where it is and make sure that it's picking
up that one in rc.serial. (You'll get "No such file or directory" if a
program tries to use a library loader that doesn't exist, say, because
of an upgrade.)
Can miniterminal dial out? Does "ls -l /dev/ttyS0" look OK? Here it
looks like this:
crw-rw-r-- 1 root tty 4, 64 Jun 17 15:51 /dev/ttyS0
Is it possible that anything else uses /dev/ttyS0? "cat /proc/ioports"
will show the ports for devices; do any use 0x3f8? "cat /proc/interrupts"
will show IRQs for the active devices; does anything else use IRQ 4?
I can't help with particulars involving kppp or miniterminal, neither
of which I have.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* The wealth of a nation is created by the productive labor of its
* citizens. */
------------------------------
From: "Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 2 ethernet cards in RH6. Not as easy as it sounds!
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 10:10:27 -0400
Ok, so I've read the ethernet How-to again and again and I seem
to be getting nowhere fast.
I have 2 ISA 3com 3c509b's installed in a 486 running RH6.
After using the supplied DOS utils to disable the PNP features
I configured them as follows.
1st: i/o 300h using irq 10
2nd: i/o 310h using irq 11
Both set to full duplex and drivers are optimized for "Server"
In my /etc/conf.modules I've tried the following 2 configurations
as defined by the ethernet howto.
First I tried this:
alias eth0 3c509
alias eth1 3c509
options 3c509 io=0x300,0x310
When I reboot it fails to "bring up interface for eth0" and doesn't
even look for eth1. I get the very same results when I try this:
alias eth0 3c509
alias eth1 3c509
options eth0 -o 3c509-0 io=0x300 irq=10
options eth1 -o 3c509-1 io=0x310 irq=11
The system is still in the setup stage so it's not actually connected
to a network.
The system also worked fine before I tried modifying the conf.modules
file to add support for the 2nd NIC. :)
Thanks for the help
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"When you tell the truth, you never have to remember what you said..."
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
