Linux-Networking Digest #579, Volume #12 Mon, 13 Sep 99 21:13:36 EDT
Contents:
Re: named fails since upgrading from RH5.1 to RH5.2 (Mark Worsdall)
Re: Realtek 8029 unter SUSE 6.1 (Chris)
Re: A Challenge ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
net2phone and ipchains (Zeus Katachthonios)
Routing questions... (Peter F. Curran)
Re: named fails since upgrading from RH5.1 to RH5.2 ("Cowles, Steve")
Dos client and Samba ("G.C.")
Re: Using Win98 Proxy with linux (Stephan Esterhuizen)
Re: Using Win98 Proxy with linux (Stephan Esterhuizen)
Re: Fetchmail: fetching for multiple users in one pass (bill davidsen)
Re: URGENT: Dual NIC Problem (bill davidsen)
Strange network problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Mark Worsdall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: named fails since upgrading from RH5.1 to RH5.2
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 16:57:16 +0100
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roderic Tse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes
>Mark Worsdall wrote:
>> Could it be that since rh5.2 it has compiled something different, it
>> seems not to be reading all my primary files like it once did?
>
>your bind is version 8 now, which works slightly differently from bind 4.
>instead of the named.boot, it reads the config from named.conf and it has a
>different format. there's a converter somewhere which will make your named.boot
>into a named.conf, but i can't remember what it's called now.
>
>
Well named.bootconf.pl doesn't work, it just sits there if I execute it.
Should I upgrade using the latest bind from bind themselves (8.2.1)?
Will that work with linux?
--
Mark Worsdall - Oh no, I've run out of underpants :(
Home:- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wizdom.org.uk
Shadow:- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.shadow.org.uk
Work:- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hinwick.demon.co.uk
Web site Monitoring:- http://www.shadow.org.uk/SiteSight/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris)
Subject: Re: Realtek 8029 unter SUSE 6.1
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 19:59:42 GMT
On Sun, 12 Sep 1999 15:11:02 +0200, bernward halfkann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in comp.os.linux.networking:
>Daniel Saegert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hallo zusammen,
>
>> also ich habe folgendes Problem.
>> Ich m�chte auf meinem Rechner (Pentium III 500, Win98 SE + SuSE 6.1) meine
>> Netzwerkkarte REALTEK 8029 zu laufen bewegen.
>
>isa or/oder pci? What/welche kernel-options/optionen?
>
>bernward
The RTL8029 cards use the "ne2k-pci.o" driver. Some manufacturers don't
do a good job of sharing IRQs, so you may need to manually configure your
motherboard to provide a unique IRQ to that card in order for it to boot.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A Challenge
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 20:10:41 GMT
Hey,
Try looking into MuLinux or Trinux. These are MiniLinux distributions.
Both run on like 2 or 3 floppies (actually, you can do them with just
one floppy, but you won't have many progs to play with).
I currently run MuLinux on a 486/50 with 20MB of memory and NO hard
drive. Although it is limited in what it can do, it does IP routing, IP
masquerading and all the IP filtering I need it to do. (I believe it is
using IPchains.)
Anyhow, look into it. These mini distributions are really neat and REAL
simply to install. Heh, all I had to do was put the floppy in the drive
and start my PC up.
Good Luck!
-Brett
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A Challenge
> I have a 486 SX -25 mhz machine. with a 40mb HDD and a monochrome
video
> card (Hercules - Text only, pretty much)
> Would it be possible, to somehow get a version of something, probably
> linux on to it, so it can just sit there and work as a firewall or
> tcpwrapper or whatever the hell you need to act as protection to your
> system? The burning question is, will it be possible.. I can put a
300mb
> HDD on it, but I would prefer to keep that one else where..
>
> --
> Aluminium makes up almost 8% of the earths crust.
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Zeus Katachthonios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: net2phone and ipchains
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 20:55:31 -0400
So, I have set up a network at our house (5guys live here) and connected
it to the net using an ISDN connection and ipchains. I assigned the
internal network to 10.0.0.0/24 and set up mail on the masq server. So,
one of my roomates has complained that he can no longer use net2phone
across this setup. I checked out the net2phone site and they have some
information regarding net2phone behind a firewall... but I have not had
the
expertise to impliment this with ipchaining rules...
(http://www.net2phone.com/english/help/firewall.html). The question is,
how would I do this?
(security is not a big issue... I just want it to work without punching
too many holes in the masqserver's security. what follows is the
ipchaining setup on the
masq server and make it so that any machine behind the masq server can
utilize net2phone through the server.
Thanks,
Jonathan
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_ftp
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_raudio
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_irc
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_quake
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_cuseeme
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_vdolive
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
ipchains -P forward DENY
ipchains -A forward -s
10.0.0.0/255.255.255.0 -j MASQ
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter F. Curran)
Subject: Routing questions...
Date: 13 Sep 1999 19:38:34 GMT
Hi,
I have a situation where I need to "split" two halves
of an existing coax-based subnet so that the high traffic
area is isolated. These machines talk primarily to each
other, and I'd like the rest of the ethernet segment not
to see their packets. Firewalling is also a concern. The
gateway to the rest of the 'net will be on the low traffic
side.
Unfortuantely the IPs are assigned in such a way
as to make sub-subnetting impossible. I have a linux
box using 2.0.x with two ethernet cards which I attempted
to use for this job. I tried to manually set up routes
and 'arp' settings for each of the individual IP addresses,
but it didn't work. Is this something the 'routed' daemon
can handle automatically? Would the machines in the "high
traffic area" need to specify the linux box as the gateway,
or would the linux box automatically handle this?
Can someone either point me to a quick 'howto'? Much
obliged!
--
Peter F Curran
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
"If you paid for your operating system, you probably
paid too much for your operating system."
**** USE EMAIL ADDRESS IN ORG LINE TO REPLY ****
------------------------------
From: "Cowles, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: named fails since upgrading from RH5.1 to RH5.2
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 19:00:17 -0500
Mark,
The reason named-bootconf.pl just "sits there" is because you probably did not specify
the
input file, like /etc/named.boot!!!! The program is waiting for input... which
typically
is specified as a command line argument (like /etc/named.boot) or comes in from a pipe.
try one of the following commands, they all worked on my system (RH60)
named-bootconf.pl /etc/named.boot >/etc/named.conf
or
named-bootconf.pl </etc/named.boot >/etc/named.conf
or even...
cat /etc/named.boot | named-bootconf.pl >/etc/named.conf
Steve Cowles
Mark Worsdall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roderic Tse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes
> >Mark Worsdall wrote:
> >> Could it be that since rh5.2 it has compiled something different, it
> >> seems not to be reading all my primary files like it once did?
> >
> >your bind is version 8 now, which works slightly differently from bind 4.
> >instead of the named.boot, it reads the config from named.conf and it has a
> >different format. there's a converter somewhere which will make your named.boot
> >into a named.conf, but i can't remember what it's called now.
> >
> >
>
> Well named.bootconf.pl doesn't work, it just sits there if I execute it.
>
> Should I upgrade using the latest bind from bind themselves (8.2.1)?
> Will that work with linux?
> --
> Mark Worsdall - Oh no, I've run out of underpants :(
> Home:- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wizdom.org.uk
> Shadow:- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.shadow.org.uk
> Work:- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hinwick.demon.co.uk
> Web site Monitoring:- http://www.shadow.org.uk/SiteSight/
------------------------------
From: "G.C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Dos client and Samba
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 20:18:22 -0400
I'am trying to connect an old box (486 runnind DOS 6,22) with my Linux
server which runs Samba. When my old box is loaded with Win95, it
connect flawlessly with my server, so the smb.conf should be ok. When I
install DOS on my old box, I can ping my server from my old box, but the
server can't validate my login. I get the message:
Your were logged on, but have not been validaded by a server.
Therefore, you may not have permission to use some network ressources.
I give the partial content of some files which may help to identify the
problem.
Thanks for any help.
Gilles
Here an excerpt of my smb.conf file:
[global]
workgroup = College
guest account = nobody
keep alive = 30
os level = 2
security = user
; security = server
password server = 192.168.1.10
; encrypt passwords = yes
printing = bsd
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = yes
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
map to guest = Bad User
interfaces = 192.168.1.10/255.255.255.0
wins support = no
logon script = logon.bat
domain logons = yes
domain master = yes
[netlogon]
path = /home/netlogon
public = yes
read only = yes
guest ok = yes
locking = no
case sensitive = no
... etc...
Here is my protocol.ini for the DOS client:
[network.setup]
version=0x3110
netcard=SMC800Z,1,SMC800Z,1
transport=ms$nwlink,MS$NWLINK
transport=ms$ndishlp,MS$NDISHLP
transport=ms$netbeui,MS$NETBEUI
transport=tcpip,TCPIP
lana0=SMC800Z,1,ms$nwlink
lana1=SMC800Z,1,ms$ndishlp
lana2=SMC800Z,1,tcpip
lana3=SMC800Z,1,ms$netbeui
[TCPIP]
NBSessions=6
SubNetMask0=255 255 255 0
IPAddress0=192 168 1 20
DisableDHCP=1
DriverName=TCPIP$
BINDINGS=SMC800Z
LANABASE=1
[MS$NWLINK]
FRAME=ETHERNET_802.2
DriverName=nwlink$
BINDINGS=SMC800Z
[MS$W8003S]
ramaddress=0xD000
iobase=0x300
irq=3
[protman]
DriverName=PROTMAN$
PRIORITY=MS$NDISHLP
[SMC800Z]
DriverName=SMC8000$
iobase=0x280
[MS$NDISHLP]
DriverName=ndishlp$
[MS$NETBEUI]
DriverName=netbeui$
SESSIONS=10
NCBS=12
BINDINGS=SMC800Z
LANABASE=2
and my system.ini
[network]
sizworkbuf=1498
filesharing=no
printsharing=no
autologon=yes
computername=GILLES
lanroot=C:\NET
username=GILLES
workgroup=COLLEGE
reconnect=yes
dospophotkey=N
lmlogon=1
logondomain=COLLEGE
preferredredir=full
autostart=full
maxconnections=8
[network drivers]
netcard=smc8000.dos
transport=ndishlp.sys,*netbeui,tcpdrv.dos,nemm.dos
devdir=C:\NET
LoadRMDrivers=yes
[386enh]
TimerCriticalSection=5000
UniqueDosPSP=TRUE
PSPIncrement=2
[Password Lists]
*Shares=C:\NET\Shares.PWL
GILLES=C:\NET\GILLES.PWL
Finally the autoexec.bat file: (I have to rem some commands because
there is not enough memory left: I have a 8Mg RAM).
LH /L:0;1,45968 /S C:\DOS\SMARTDRV.EXE /X
@ECHO OFF
PROMPT $p$g
PATH C:\NET;C:\DOS
SET TEMP=C:\DOS
LH /L:1,16384 KEYB US,,C:\DOS\KEYBOARD.SYS
LH /L:0;1,46288 /S C:\NET\net initialize
LH /L:1,65792 C:\NET\netbind.com
LH /L:0;1,736 /S C:\NET\umb.com
LH /L:0;1,800 C:\NET\TCPTSR.EXE
rem C:\NET\tcptsr.exe
rem LH /L:0;1,600 C:\NET\TINYRFC.EXE
rem C:\NET\NMTSR.EXE
rem C:\NET\EMSBFR.EXE
rem C:\NET\tinyrfc.exe
rem C:\NET\nmtsr.exe
rem C:\NET\emsbfr.exe
LH /L:0;1,17072 /S C:\NET\net start
and the config.sys:
DEVICE=C:\DOS\HIMEM.SYS
rem DEVICE=C:\DOS\EMM386.EXE NOEMS
BUFFERS=15,0
FILES=30
DOS=UMB
LASTDRIVE=Z
FCBS=4,0
DEVICEHIGH /L:1,12368 =C:\DOS\SETVER.EXE
DOS=HIGH
DEVICEHIGH /L:1,4656 =C:\NET\IFSHLP.SYS
Some tcpdump exchange between the two boxes:
(the IP 192.168.1.20 has slave.levis.com as name (the DOS box), the
server has IP 192.168.1.10 and the name Yuppie.levis.com)
11:20:07.558360 arp who-has slave.levis.com tell slave.levis.com
11:20:08.060180 arp who-has slave.levis.com tell slave.levis.com
11:20:08.609367 arp who-has slave.levis.com tell slave.levis.com
11:20:09.425826
>>> NetBeui Packet
Type=0x3 Length=44 Signature=0xEFFF Command=0x1
Unknown Netbios Command Data: (39 bytes)
[000] 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 02 A3 68 5A 0B C0 74 03 E9 ........
.hZ..t..
[010] 68 FB FF 36 C4 71 E8 47 49 4C 4C 45 53 20 20 20 h..6.q.G ILLES
[020] 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 .
Extra
0:0:c0:cf:5a:b8 > 3:0:0:0:0:1 sap f0 ui/C
>>> Unknown IPX Data: (44 bytes)
[000] 2C 00 FF EF 01 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 02 A3 68 5A ,.......
......hZ
[010] 0B C0 74 03 E9 68 FB FF 36 C4 71 E8 47 49 4C 4C ..t..h..
6.q.GILL
[020] 45 53 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 ES .
len=44
11:20:09.426143
>>> NetBeui Packet
Type=0x3 Length=44 Signature=0xEFFF Command=0x0
Unknown Netbios Command Data: (39 bytes)
[000] 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 04 B8 FE FF 50 E8 A1 F7 5B ........
...P...[
[010] 8D 46 E4 16 50 E8 5A 43 4F 4C 4C 45 47 45 20 20 .F..P.ZC OLLEGE
[020] 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 .
Extra
0:0:c0:cf:5a:b8 > 3:0:0:0:0:1 sap f0 ui/C
>>> Unknown IPX Data: (44 bytes)
[000] 2C 00 FF EF 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 04 B8 FE FF ,.......
........
[010] 50 E8 A1 F7 5B 8D 46 E4 16 50 E8 5A 43 4F 4C 4C P...[.F.
.P.ZCOLL
[020] 45 47 45 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 EGE .
len=44
11:20:09.927459
>>> NetBeui Packet
Type=0x3 Length=44 Signature=0xEFFF Command=0x0
Unknown Netbios Command Data: (39 bytes)
[000] 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 02 A3 68 5A 0B C0 74 03 E9 ........
.hZ..t..
[010] 68 FB FF 36 C4 71 E8 43 4F 4C 4C 45 47 45 20 20 h..6.q.C OLLEGE
[020] 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 .
Extra
0:0:c0:cf:5a:b8 > 3:0:0:0:0:1 sap f0 ui/C
>>> Unknown IPX Data: (44 bytes)
[000] 2C 00 FF EF 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 02 A3 68 5A ,.......
......hZ
[010] 0B C0 74 03 E9 68 FB FF 36 C4 71 E8 43 4F 4C 4C ..t..h..
6.q.COLL
[020] 45 47 45 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 EGE .
len=44
11:20:09.927551
>>> NetBeui Packet
Type=0x3 Length=44 Signature=0xEFFF Command=0x1
Unknown Netbios Command Data: (39 bytes)
[000] 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 04 B8 FE FF 50 E8 A1 F7 5B ........
...P...[
[010] 8D 46 E4 16 50 E8 5A 47 49 4C 4C 45 53 20 20 20 .F..P.ZG ILLES
[020] 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 .
Extra
0:0:c0:cf:5a:b8 > 3:0:0:0:0:1 sap f0 ui/C
>>> Unknown IPX Data: (44 bytes)
[000] 2C 00 FF EF 01 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 04 B8 FE FF ,.......
........
[010] 50 E8 A1 F7 5B 8D 46 E4 16 50 E8 5A 47 49 4C 4C P...[.F.
.P.ZGILL
[020] 45 53 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 ES .
len=44
11:20:10.476636
>>> NetBeui Packet
Type=0x3 Length=44 Signature=0xEFFF Command=0x1
Unknown Netbios Command Data: (39 bytes)
[000] 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 02 A3 68 5A 0B C0 74 03 E9 ........
.hZ..t..
[010] 68 FB FF 36 C4 71 E8 47 49 4C 4C 45 53 20 20 20 h..6.q.G ILLES
[020] 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 .
Extra
0:0:c0:cf:5a:b8 > 3:0:0:0:0:1 sap f0 ui/C
>>> Unknown IPX Data: (44 bytes)
[000] 2C 00 FF EF 01 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 02 A3 68 5A ,.......
......hZ
[010] 0B C0 74 03 E9 68 FB FF 36 C4 71 E8 47 49 4C 4C ..t..h..
6.q.GILL
[020] 45 53 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 ES .
len=44
11:20:10.476724
>>> NetBeui Packet
Type=0x3 Length=44 Signature=0xEFFF Command=0x0
Unknown Netbios Command Data: (39 bytes)
[000] 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 04 B8 FE FF 50 E8 A1 F7 5B ........
...P...[
[010] 8D 46 E4 16 50 E8 5A 43 4F 4C 4C 45 47 45 20 20 .F..P.ZC OLLEGE
[020] 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 .
Extra
0:0:c0:cf:5a:b8 > 3:0:0:0:0:1 sap f0 ui/C
>>> Unknown IPX Data: (44 bytes)
[000] 2C 00 FF EF 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 04 B8 FE FF ,.......
........
[010] 50 E8 A1 F7 5B 8D 46 E4 16 50 E8 5A 43 4F 4C 4C P...[.F.
.P.ZCOLL
[020] 45 47 45 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 EGE .
len=44
11:20:20.065859
>>> NetBeui Packet
Type=0x3 Length=44 Signature=0xEFFF Command=0x8
NetbiosDataGram:
Destination=COLLEGE NameType=0x00 (Workstation)
Source=GILLES NameType=0x00 (Workstation)
SMB PACKET: SMBtrans (REQUEST)
SMB Command = 0x25
Error class = 0x0
Error code = 0
Flags1 = 0x0
Flags2 = 0x0
Tree ID = 65535
Proc ID = 19331
UID = 65535
MID = 33
Word Count = 17
TotParamCnt=
0:0:c0:cf:5a:b8 > 3:0:0:0:0:1 sap f0 ui/C
>>> IPX transport Data: (44 bytes)
[000] 2C 00 FF EF 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 43 4F 4C 4C ,.......
....COLL
[010] 45 47 45 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 47 49 4C 4C EGE
.GILL
[020] 45 53 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 ES .
SMB PACKET: SMBtrans (REQUEST)
SMB Command = 0x25
Error class = 0x0
Error code = 0
Flags1 = 0x0
Flags2 = 0x0
Tree ID = 65535
Proc ID = 19331
UID = 65535
MID = 33
Word Count = 17
TotParamCnt=
len=181
11:20:23.054439
>>> NetBeui Packet
Type=0x3 Length=44 Signature=0xEFFF Command=0x8
NetbiosDataGram:
Destination=COLLEGE NameType=0x00 (Workstation)
Source=GILLES NameType=0x00 (Workstation)
SMB PACKET: SMBtrans (REQUEST)
SMB Command = 0x25
Error class = 0x0
Error code = 0
Flags1 = 0x0
Flags2 = 0x0
Tree ID = 65535
Proc ID = 19331
UID = 65535
MID = 65
Word Count = 17
TotParamCnt=
0:0:c0:cf:5a:b8 > 3:0:0:0:0:1 sap f0 ui/C
>>> IPX transport Data: (44 bytes)
[000] 2C 00 FF EF 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 43 4F 4C 4C ,.......
....COLL
[010] 45 47 45 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 47 49 4C 4C EGE
.GILL
[020] 45 53 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 ES .
SMB PACKET: SMBtrans (REQUEST)
SMB Command = 0x25
Error class = 0x0
Error code = 0
Flags1 = 0x0
Flags2 = 0x0
Tree ID = 65535
Proc ID = 19331
UID = 65535
MID = 65
Word Count = 17
TotParamCnt=
len=181
11:20:26.075004
>>> NetBeui Packet
Type=0x3 Length=44 Signature=0xEFFF Command=0x8
NetbiosDataGram:
Destination=COLLEGE NameType=0x00 (Workstation)
Source=GILLES NameType=0x00 (Workstation)
SMB PACKET: SMBtrans (REQUEST)
SMB Command = 0x25
Error class = 0x0
Error code = 0
Flags1 = 0x0
Flags2 = 0x0
Tree ID = 65535
Proc ID = 19331
UID = 65535
MID = 97
Word Count = 17
TotParamCnt=
0:0:c0:cf:5a:b8 > 3:0:0:0:0:1 sap f0 ui/C
>>> IPX transport Data: (44 bytes)
[000] 2C 00 FF EF 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 43 4F 4C 4C ,.......
....COLL
[010] 45 47 45 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 47 49 4C 4C EGE
.GILL
[020] 45 53 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 ES .
SMB PACKET: SMBtrans (REQUEST)
SMB Command = 0x25
Error class = 0x0
Error code = 0
Flags1 = 0x0
Flags2 = 0x0
Tree ID = 65535
Proc ID = 19331
UID = 65535
MID = 97
Word Count = 17
TotParamCnt=
len=181
11:20:29.095570
>>> NetBeui Packet
Type=0x3 Length=44 Signature=0xEFFF Command=0x8
NetbiosDataGram:
Destination=COLLEGE NameType=0x00 (Workstation)
Source=GILLES NameType=0x00 (Workstation)
SMB PACKET: SMBtrans (REQUEST)
SMB Command = 0x25
Error class = 0x0
Error code = 0
Flags1 = 0x0
Flags2 = 0x0
Tree ID = 65535
Proc ID = 19331
UID = 65535
MID = 129
Word Count = 17
TotParamCnt=
MB PACKET: SMBtrans (REQUEST)
SMB Command = 0x25
Error class = 0x0
Error code = 0
Flags1 = 0x0
Flags2 = 0x0
Tree ID = 65535
Proc ID = 19331
UID = 65535
MID = 65
Word Count = 17
TotParamCnt=
len=181
11:20:26.075004
>>> NetBeui Packet
Type=0x3 Length=44 Signature=0xEFFF Command=0x8
NetbiosDataGram:
Destination=COLLEGE NameType=0x00 (Workstation)
Source=GILLES NameType=0x00 (Workstation)
SMB PACKET: SMBtrans (REQUEST)
SMB Command = 0x25
Error class = 0x0
Error code = 0
Flags1 = 0x0
Flags2 = 0x0
Tree ID = 65535
Proc ID = 19331
UID = 65535
MID = 97
Word Count = 17
TotParamCnt=
0:0:c0:cf:5a:b8 > 3:0:0:0:0:1 sap f0 ui/C
>>> IPX transport Data: (44 bytes)
[000] 2C 00 FF EF 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 43 4F 4C 4C ,.......
....COLL
>>> IPX transport Data: (44 bytes)
[000] 2C 00 FF EF 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 43 4F 4C 4C ,.......
....COLL
[010] 45 47 45 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 47 49 4C 4C EGE
.GILL
[020] 45 53 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 ES .
SMB PACKET: SMBtrans (REQUEST)
SMB Command = 0x25
Error class = 0x0
Error code = 0
Flags1 = 0x0
Flags2 = 0x0
Tree ID = 65535
Proc ID = 19331
UID = 65535
MID = 129
Word Count = 17
TotParamCnt=
len=181
------------------------------
From: Stephan Esterhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Using Win98 Proxy with linux
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 18:15:51 -0600
>
> >Any ideas?
>
> Yep - use the Linux box as the router (with IP Masquerading) and let the
> windows box access the 'net through that.
>
> IP Masq is better than a proxy as it is transparent to the client usually
> (and there is direct support for many common protocols).
>
> Don
well, the problem is that the modem is a WINmodem (ugh)... I had limited
money (since I am just a senior in highschool)... so I figured that I do
have a windows and a linux system, so buy a winmodem for next to nothing and
put it in the windows system...
But that is if I understand your explanation right, you want me to put the
modem in the linux box and set the box up as a router right?
------------------------------
From: Stephan Esterhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Using Win98 Proxy with linux
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 18:33:17 -0600
>
> well, the problem is that the modem is a WINmodem (ugh)... I had limited
> money (since I am just a senior in highschool)... so I figured that I do
> have a windows and a linux system, so buy a winmodem for next to nothing and
> put it in the windows system...
>
Now that we are on the topic of modems, the one I bought was the Diamond Supra
Max Internal 56k. When I first plugged it into the 98 system, it emulated a
COM3 by using IRQ10 and IO port E800. But what I noticed is that in the
settings one can say 'Dos compatibility' then according to the program, it sets
the hardware settings for you to IO : 3e8 IRQ : 4. So after I did this, I
booted into linux (i got win95 on the linux machine also), did a 'pnpdump' but
linux found no modem...
aw well, such is life, but maybe someone has an explanation?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bill davidsen)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Fetchmail: fetching for multiple users in one pass
Date: 13 Sep 1999 21:29:45 GMT
In article <Z8WC3.48955$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
YouDontKnowWho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| How can we get fetchmail to, in one pass, check the e-mail account on
| our ISP for each of our users and locally distribute the e-mail
| appropriately? Can fetchmail be set up to do that? We would like to
| have a single configuration file that tells fetchmail what to check
| and who to give the resulting e-mail to. That way, setting e-mail
| delivery for new users on the system involves just adding a new line
| to the configuration file.
|
| If fetchmail cannot do this, is there anything out there that can do
| this?
You can reduce the administrative overhead of this, by using the
fetchmailcr and some poll commands to have a single run of fetchmail get
all the mail. However, you are still opening a socket for each user, you
are just putting the parameters in a single file. That file will contain
passwords for mail on the remote machine, so there are some issues
there, as well.
The alternative is to have all the mail for your machine, to any user,
dropped into a single mailbox which can be fetched with a single
connect. I'm told there's an easy way to do this, I don't know how, I
have dropped a rewrite rule into sendmail.cf rather than chase the
"easy" way.
Since fetchmail makes a connect to your smtp port and uses sendmail to
deliver, everything should get delivered correctly.
Oh, if you have a fixed IP address, there's a great way, don't have
mailboxes on the ISP, just get your IP in DNS and let the messages sit
in mailqueue. Then when you want to poll, just send ETRN to the ISP, and
the connect will be made, all mail will be delivered, and you will
never have do *any* per-user config anywhere. To me this is the easy
solution by far!
--
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
I thought I had forgotten how to throw a boomerang, but it's
all coming back to me...
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bill davidsen)
Subject: Re: URGENT: Dual NIC Problem
Date: 13 Sep 1999 21:38:37 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Warren Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| > The problem is that if I bring down eth1 (Embedded card), I can still
| > connect to eth0. BUT if I bring down eth0, it also brings down eth1
| > severing all connectivity to this machine!
| This may be a problem with the ifdown scripts for the eth0 interface.
| Look in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts. (You'll need to be able to read
| Bourne shell scripts. If you can't it's an excellent time to learn.
Could be routing... when the interface comes down all routes through it
go away. If multiple NICs are connected to the net you can configure to
accept incoming packets on several NICs and send everything out on just
one. I've even done that deliberately once, but it's usually a problem
with a poorly chosen default route or something.
--
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
I thought I had forgotten how to throw a boomerang, but it's
all coming back to me...
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Strange network problem
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 00:28:33 GMT
I rebooted my system yesterday, and since then have been unable to
establish any network connections. Connections initiated from other
machines (e.g. ping, http; not ssh because it tries to lookup the
connecting ip on the nameserver) work, but I cannot connect to
anything. I'm running Debian potato with a 2.2.10 kernel. Firewalling
is /not/ compiled into the kernel. I looked through all the files in
/etc/ modified in the last two weeks, but didn't find anything that
would cause this (as far as I know; perhaps someone more experienced
would find something). Does anyone have any idea what may have caused
this, or what files I should look at?
Thanks,
-Ben
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
