Linux-Networking Digest #678, Volume #11 Sat, 26 Jun 99 11:13:33 EDT
Contents:
Re: Why not C++ (Tristan Wibberley)
Re: Strange PPP problem with HTTP pages greater that 1200bytes/Ricochet (Clifford
Kite)
2.2.10 problems with 2nd NETjet card (Mark Constable)
FTP and IPchains\Masquerading (Ian)
Re: MAKE GOOD MONEY $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ (Rick M)
Re: caching only nameserver (Terje Trane)
Re: ppp problems (Clifford Kite)
Re: Local network setup help !! ("Philippe CHARDONNET")
DNS help!!! ("Ed Willoughby")
Henryk Paluch's Lexmark 5700 Printer driver ("Frederik Meerwaldt")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Tristan Wibberley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Why not C++
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 13:05:20 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Leete wrote:
>
> John E. Davis wrote in message ...
> >On Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:53:08 +1200, Bruce Hoult <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >wrote:
> >> some_function(&foo);
> >>
> >>What will be foo's value after the call to some_function? Will it be
> >>altered? In C he has no way of knowing because C programmers often pass
> >>structs by reference even when they don't intend to change them.
> >
> >At least the syntax indicates whether or not foo could be altered.
> >The fact remains that one cannot look at
> >
> > some_function (x)
> >
> >in C++ and be sure that x was not modified, whereas in C you know that
> >the local variable x will not be affected. And yes, like many people,
> >I use an editor that supports tags. When reading C++ code, I do have
> >to look up every such function to see whether or not something like x
> >could be modified by the function. With C, knowing instantly that x
> >could not be modified is a big help to understanding code fragments.
> >
> >--John
>
> This is FUD. If your compiler really acts like that, get a new compiler.
I think you misundstood his point.
If I'm using a C library, my program might have to say:
some_function( &x );
so, when debugging, I know right there that I can't assume x won't be
altered. The same thing in C++ would be:
some_function( x );
but I don't know whether I'm passing by value or by reference or const
by reference. I have to go and find the header, then look through it to
find the prototype for that function. It would be useful if there were a
syntax difference.
It's only a development time problem of course, not a serious design
flaw.
--
Tristan Wibberley Linux is a registered trademark
of Linus Torvalds.
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: Strange PPP problem with HTTP pages greater that 1200bytes/Ricochet
Date: 25 Jun 1999 21:28:07 -0500
Rik Sagar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Following my earlier posting, I have now worked-out that I can access
: website, provided the pages they contain are less than 1200 bytes
: (approximately).
: Does anyone know of any reason why pages greater than that size might
: fail to download?
Check the thread "mtu and problems access web sites" for one possiblity.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Editing with vi is a lot better than using a huge swiss army knife. */
------------------------------
From: Mark Constable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 2.2.10 problems with 2nd NETjet card
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 23:35:44 +1000
I was using a 2.0.35 kernel with an append line in
lilo.conf to detect a second NETjet hisax based card;
append="hisax=20,2,0,0,0,20,2,0,0,0"
however since upgrading to a 2.2.10 kernel the system
gets this far on bootup;
Lilo
Loading Linux ...
and then hangs so I presume something is different
with how 2.2.* kernels load off HDD boot blocks so
I rolled another kernel using modules intead. Now I
have this line in the ISDN startup script (all else
remains the same except changing the "status" line
to "dialmode");
/sbin/modprobe -a hisax type=20,20 protocol=2,2 id="HiSax"
and "cat /proc/pci" does indeed show two cards;
Bus 0, device 11, function 0:
Network controller: TigerJet Tiger300 ISDN (rev 0).
Medium devsel. IRQ 5. Master Capable. Latency=8.
I/O at 0x7c00 [0x7c01].
Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xef001000 [0xef001000].
Bus 0, device 12, function 0:
Network controller: TigerJet Tiger300 ISDN (rev 0).
Medium devsel. IRQ 7. Master Capable. Latency=8.
I/O at 0x6000 [0x6001].
Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xef002000 [0xef002000].
But now when dialing out the 3rd channel on the 2nd
card seems to have trouble extablishing and maintaining
a connection, the main problem seems to be here;
: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
: Connection terminated.
: taking down PHASE_DEAD link 2, linkunit: 2
: LCP is down
: closing fd 9 from unit 2
: link 2 closed , linkunit: 2
: reinit_unit: 2
: Connect[2]: /dev/ippp2, fd: 9
where the 1st channel of the 2nd card does not complete
it's LCP negotiation. The config is a 2.2.10 kernel with
15-Jun-99 CVS code + utils and the system has been working
for 6 months on a 2.0.35 kernel with lilo detecting both
cards Any help would be appreciated,
a) would anyone know how I could get the original working
lilo append line working with a 2.2.10 kernel
b) some hints as to why the modules version of a working
configuration is now not working
The full /var/log/message transcript follows and I'd be
happy to provide /dev/isdnctrl0 output or any configs
to anyone if that would help diagnose this at all.
--markc
Jun 25 13:05:50 gympie ipppd[4131]: rcvd [1][LCP EchoReq id=0x7 9f af 76 8d 65 63 6c
69]
Jun 25 13:05:50 gympie ipppd[4131]: sent [1][LCP EchoRep id=0x7 d9 11 ce dc 65 63 6c
69]
Jun 25 13:05:57 gympie ipppd[4288]: Found 4 devices: /dev/ippp0, /dev/ippp1,
/dev/ippp2, /dev/ippp3
Jun 25 13:05:57 gympie ipppd[4288]: ipppd i2.2.10 (isdn4linux version of pppd by MH)
started
Jun 25 13:05:57 gympie ipppd[4288]: init_unit: 0
Jun 25 13:05:57 gympie ipppd[4288]: Connect[0]: /dev/ippp0, fd: 7
Jun 25 13:05:57 gympie ipppd[4288]: init_unit: 1
Jun 25 13:05:57 gympie ipppd[4288]: Connect[1]: /dev/ippp1, fd: 8
Jun 25 13:05:57 gympie ipppd[4288]: init_unit: 2
Jun 25 13:05:57 gympie ipppd[4288]: Connect[2]: /dev/ippp2, fd: 9
Jun 25 13:05:57 gympie ipppd[4288]: init_unit: 3
Jun 25 13:05:57 gympie ipppd[4288]: Connect[3]: /dev/ippp3, fd: 10
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: Local number: xxxxxxxx, Remote number: 0754308100,
Type:
outgoing
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: PHASE_WAIT -> PHASE_ESTABLISHED, ifunit: 0,
linkunit: 0, fd: 7
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: sent [0][LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <magic
0xa7eb2089>
<MPmrru 0x5dc> <MPdiscr: 0x4 [ 00 00 00 00 2d 94 40 00 ]>]
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: rcvd [0][LCP ConfReq id=0x59 <auth chap md5>
<magic 0x9fb0b0d4>
<MPmrru 0x640> <MPdiscr: 0x1 [ 6d 61 72 31 2e 4d 61 72 6f 6f 63 68 79 64 6f 72 65 ]>]
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: sent [0][LCP ConfAck id=0x59 <auth chap md5>
<magic 0x9fb0b0d4>
<MPmrru 0x640> <MPdiscr: 0x1 [ 6d 61 72 31 2e 4d 61 72 6f 6f 63 68 79 64 6f 72 65 ]>]
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: rcvd [0][LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <mru 1524> <magic
0xa7eb2089>
<MPmrru 0x5dc> <MPdiscr: 0x4 [ 00 00 00 00 2d 94 40 00 ]>]
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: lcp layer is UP
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: rcvd [0][CHAP Challenge id=0x1e
<dc14ba814fe4cd16c577623234c256f3>, name = "xxxx.Maroochydore"]
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: ChapReceiveChallenge: Rcvd id 30.
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: ChapReceiveChallenge: received name field:
'xxxx.Maroochydore'
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: sent [0][CHAP Response id=0x1e
<a98d276738850c30db32eb98aa7b5054>, name = "zzzzzzzz"]
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: rcvd [0][CHAP Success id=0x1e ""]
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: ChapReceiveSuccess: Rcvd id 30.
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: MPPP negotiation, He: Yes We: Yes
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: Useifip for ippp0: Got IF-Src-IP: 114d828b
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: Useifip for ippp0: Got IF-Dst-IP: 014d828b
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: sent [0][IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr 123.45.67.17>]
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: CCP enabled! Trying CCP.
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: CCP: got ccp-unit 0 for link 0 (protocol: 0x80fd)
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: ccp_resetci!
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: Kernel check for LZS failed
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: rcvd [0][IPCP ConfReq id=0x1b <addr 123.45.67.1>]
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: sent [0][IPCP ConfAck id=0x1b <addr 123.45.67.1>]
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: rcvd [0][IPCP ConfAck id=0x1 <addr 123.45.67.17>]
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: local IP address 123.45.67.17
Jun 25 13:06:00 gympie ipppd[4288]: remote IP address 123.45.67.1
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: Local number: xxxxxxxx, Remote number: 0754308100,
Type:
outgoing
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: PHASE_WAIT -> PHASE_ESTABLISHED, ifunit: 1,
linkunit: 1, fd: 8
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: sent [1][LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <magic
0xaf151c80>
<MPmrru 0x5dc> <MPdiscr: 0x4 [ 00 00 00 00 2d 94 40 00 ]>]
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: rcvd [1][LCP ConfReq id=0x6 <auth chap md5> <magic
0x9fb0b3dc>
<MPmrru 0x640> <MPdiscr: 0x1 [ 6d 61 72 31 2e 4d 61 72 6f 6f 63 68 79 64 6f 72 65 ]>]
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: sent [1][LCP ConfAck id=0x6 <auth chap md5> <magic
0x9fb0b3dc>
<MPmrru 0x640> <MPdiscr: 0x1 [ 6d 61 72 31 2e 4d 61 72 6f 6f 63 68 79 64 6f 72 65 ]>]
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: rcvd [1][LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <mru 1524> <magic
0xaf151c80>
<MPmrru 0x5dc> <MPdiscr: 0x4 [ 00 00 00 00 2d 94 40 00 ]>]
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: lcp layer is UP
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: ioctl(SIOCSIFMTU): No such device, 6 ippp1 1460.
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: rcvd [1][CHAP Challenge id=0xaf
<cc37430ead63a40ac5776232c666c660>, name = "xxxx.Maroochydore"]
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: ChapReceiveChallenge: Rcvd id 175.
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: ChapReceiveChallenge: received name field:
'xxxx.Maroochydore'
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: sent [1][CHAP Response id=0xaf
<555b4c072f082f0a39197d3776c8f7af>, name = "zzzzzzzz"]
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: rcvd [1][CHAP Success id=0xaf ""]
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: ChapReceiveSuccess: Rcvd id 175.
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: MPPP negotiation, He: Yes We: Yes
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: ipppd[1]: discr: 2
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: ipppd[1]: passed 1
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: ipppd[1]: passed 2
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: ipppd[1]: pap/chap-check passed
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: ok, found a valid bundle with linkunit 0
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: bundle: 0
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: Local number: xxxxxxxx, Remote number: 0754308100,
Type:
outgoing
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: PHASE_WAIT -> PHASE_ESTABLISHED, ifunit: 2,
linkunit: 2, fd: 9
Jun 25 13:06:01 gympie ipppd[4288]: sent [2][LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <magic
0x81a20658>
<MPmrru 0x5dc> <MPdiscr: 0x4 [ 00 00 00 00 2d 94 40 00 ]>]
Jun 25 13:06:10 gympie last message repeated 3 times
Jun 25 13:06:11 gympie ipppd[4288]: rcvd [0][LCP EchoReq id=0x1 9f b0 b0 d4 00 03 a9
50]
Jun 25 13:06:11 gympie ipppd[4288]: sent [0][LCP EchoRep id=0x1 a7 eb 20 89 00 03 a9
50]
Jun 25 13:06:11 gympie ipppd[4288]: rcvd [1][LCP EchoReq id=0x1 9f b0 b3 dc 05 05 06
9f]
Jun 25 13:06:11 gympie ipppd[4288]: sent [1][LCP EchoRep id=0x1 af 15 1c 80 05 05 06
9f]
Jun 25 13:06:13 gympie ipppd[4288]: sent [2][LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <magic
0x81a20658>
<MPmrru 0x5dc> <MPdiscr: 0x4 [ 00 00 00 00 2d 94 40 00 ]>]
Jun 25 13:06:19 gympie last message repeated 2 times
Jun 25 13:06:20 gympie ipppd[4288]: rcvd [0][LCP EchoReq id=0x2 9f b0 b0 d4 00 00 00
00]
Jun 25 13:06:20 gympie ipppd[4288]: sent [0][LCP EchoRep id=0x2 a7 eb 20 89 00 00 00
00]
Jun 25 13:06:20 gympie ipppd[4288]: rcvd [1][LCP EchoReq id=0x2 9f b0 b3 dc 00 03 a9
51]
Jun 25 13:06:20 gympie ipppd[4288]: sent [1][LCP EchoRep id=0x2 af 15 1c 80 00 03 a9
51]
Jun 25 13:06:22 gympie ipppd[4288]: sent [2][LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <magic
0x81a20658>
<MPmrru 0x5dc> <MPdiscr: 0x4 [ 00 00 00 00 2d 94 40 00 ]>]
Jun 25 13:06:28 gympie last message repeated 2 times
Jun 25 13:06:31 gympie ipppd[4288]: rcvd [0][LCP EchoReq id=0x3 9f b0 b0 d4 1d 06 16
7d]
Jun 25 13:06:31 gympie ipppd[4288]: sent [0][LCP EchoRep id=0x3 a7 eb 20 89 1d 06 16
7d]
Jun 25 13:06:31 gympie ipppd[4288]: rcvd [1][LCP EchoReq id=0x3 9f b0 b3 dc 05 06 81
a2]
Jun 25 13:06:31 gympie ipppd[4288]: sent [1][LCP EchoRep id=0x3 af 15 1c 80 05 06 81
a2]
Jun 25 13:06:31 gympie ipppd[4288]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Jun 25 13:06:31 gympie ipppd[4288]: Connection terminated.
Jun 25 13:06:31 gympie ipppd[4288]: taking down PHASE_DEAD link 2, linkunit: 2
Jun 25 13:06:31 gympie ipppd[4288]: LCP is down
Jun 25 13:06:31 gympie ipppd[4288]: closing fd 9 from unit 2
Jun 25 13:06:31 gympie ipppd[4288]: link 2 closed , linkunit: 2
Jun 25 13:06:31 gympie ipppd[4288]: reinit_unit: 2
Jun 25 13:06:31 gympie ipppd[4288]: Connect[2]: /dev/ippp2, fd: 9
Jun 25 13:06:41 gympie ipppd[4288]: rcvd [0][LCP EchoReq id=0x4 9f b0 b0 d4 fc 01 dd
5c]
Jun 25 13:06:41 gympie ipppd[4288]: sent [0][LCP EchoRep id=0x4 a7 eb 20 89 fc 01 dd
5c]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian)
Subject: FTP and IPchains\Masquerading
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 13:49:07 GMT
Hello I wonder if anyone can help me?
I have been trying and failing to access a company ftp site that is
not running on port 21 (the reasons for this are a paranoid IT
Director who decided it would be best to keep our sensitive data as
well hidden as possible).
I am am running a small home network using a RH6 machine as my web
gateway using ipchains\masquerading, everything else works ok just
the ftp side is giving me hell. I get as far as the LIST -L command in
my ftp client (Cuteftp) and it just hangs until I stop the process.
Cute tells me it "couldnt build a data connection".
Previously I had been running an NT4 machine with Sygate as the
gateway and it worked fine after I added a rule for the port to the
config file.
I have tried adding the ip_masq_ftp module line also including a
ports=ip_masq_ftp XXX line to my rc.firewall file but it makes no
difference, it refuses to play ball.
I'd hate to go back to using an NT Machine as my gateway but it seems
I will have to.
Is it an impossibilty or am I missing something obvious. Does NT4 win
hands down on this occasion?
------------------------------
From: Rick M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.networking.ras,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.win95,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking
Subject: Re: MAKE GOOD MONEY $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 13:47:30 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"debee99" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To make money when you are on the internet. You have to visit
> www.gotoworld.com. When you visit the site you will need to get a pass
> wordand user name. But when you get that dun at the same time you
should to
> enter 1006559531. That goes where it says << Friend's Member ID. When
you do
> that every one that use that # gets paid more. And the same for you.
When I
> use it you get payed more for useing that #.
> THANK YOU.
No thank you! If it wasn't for you, I would have had no reason to send
this post to the gotoworld.com postmaster. The only $$ you'll be
collecting is from your McDonald's job.
Got fries?
Luser.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Terje Trane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: caching only nameserver
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 15:52:20 +0200
The data is stored in memory, but you can dump it to a file.
It is described in 'man named'.
You do it by sending a SIGINT to named (kill -INT `pidof named`)
The data ends up in /var/tmp/named_dump.db
There also exists an utility in the bind-package called 'ndc'
(name deamon control) that might be an idea to look at (man ndc).
Then you can do a 'ndc dumpdb' to do the same as above.
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: ppp problems
Date: 26 Jun 1999 09:10:19 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Clifford Kite wrote:
: > You can add the pppd option kdebug 7 and get hex dumps of
: everything, a last resort kind of thing.
: >
: > I'd a least take a look at the serial port configuration and make sure
: > it's correct. But that kind of problem usually shows up in the PPP
: > link negotiations and there was no sign of such a problem in them.
: >
: >
: ok if I run with the noccp and kdebug 7 options set I noticed that my
: machine sends the following packet every 4 seconds:
: Jun 24 17:19:28 localhost kernel: ppp: write frame, count = 49
: Jun 24 17:19:28 localhost kernel: FF 03 00 21 45 00 00 2D ...!E..-
: Jun 24 17:19:28 localhost kernel: 00 6E 00 00 40 11 42 9E [email protected].
: Jun 24 17:19:28 localhost kernel: D1 60 A0 26 C6 29 00 04 .`.&.)..
: Jun 24 17:19:28 localhost kernel: 04 00 00 35 00 19 8E 10 ...5....
: Jun 24 17:19:28 localhost kernel: 32 C1 00 00 00 01 00 00 2.......
: Jun 24 17:19:28 localhost kernel: 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 ........
: Jun 24 17:19:28 localhost kernel: 01 .
These are IP packets and in the absence of FCS errors I'd believe
that they are OK. Your problem is receiving and since there's no
mention of any received packet I take it that there weren't any
of those.
I'm baffled too now. Repeating, the PPP link looked good as did the
routing, and if the serial port configuration is OK then I'm out of
suggestions.
..
: also I was wondering if their is any way of finding out what the various
: kdebug levels do sort of greping through the source? its not in the
: ppp howto files is there a web site that has this stuff?
: thanks
The pppd manual pages give a brief description of the kdebug printout
for 1, 2, and 4 . The other levels are sums of these and aggregate
the printouts, except 0 which seems to be equivalent to removing kdebug
altogether.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Microsoft is a great marketing organization.
* It _has_ to be */
------------------------------
From: "Philippe CHARDONNET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Local network setup help !!
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 16:34:01 +0200
Hi !!
Monte Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a �crit dans le message :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> This site has a step by step howto for complete setup of samba. steps
> for both linux and the win machine. (and they really work <G>)
> http://www.sfu.ca/~yzhang/linux/samba/index.html
> and this one as well
> http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai/samba.html
>
> These sites singly or in combination are nearly guaranteed to get you
> networked.
>
Well ! I've downloaded both files a few days ago and I've been reading them
time and again...
Alas there are a few things I don't really understand !!!
Both files are indeed very comprehensive, but there are some things that are
supposed to be already done once you start installing and /or cheking the
Samba installation thanks to these files , like some dirs and things like
that !!
Unfortunately, and in spite of the explanations I couldn't get my Linux PC
working properly...
My problem is that I don't know what I'm supposed to do to key in the data
about my win98 computer in Linux such as Ip adress, submask, account and
etc...
What are these steps ?? If I can't tell Linux where it has to look for the
other machine and how !! it'll be unable to make Samba working properly !!!
Man pages are way to complicated and as I said in my first e-mail I can't go
any further without those thing fully installed on Linux !!!
Can you help me ???
Thanks again for your answer !
Phil.
------------------------------
From: "Ed Willoughby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DNS help!!!
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:01:30 -0400
Have posted this in the DNS news group, but no help.. So thought I would try
here.
Good morning... I have been following this news group for some time now and
have learned more then I ever could from a Book or how to.. Now I'm in need
of some help and thought I'd try here...
First, I'm fairly new to Linux and Bind.... I just reregistered a domain
with interNic
pcvalley.com
Second I'm on a cable modem with a fixed IP. My provider told me to setup
my own DNS and use him as secondary..
I have not been able to locate a good book on Bind & DNS from the local
stores, so I have been relegated to using only the man bind doc's and
Nicolai Langfeldt's DNS HOWTO v2.2 11 Feb 1999.
(quite a helpful source http://metalab.unc.edu/mdw/HOWTO/DNS-HOWTO.html)
Anyway, now here is the problem.. Perhaps a pasted copy of the Linux log
will best serve here:
Sample 1.
Jun 25 13:15:33 pcflight named[194]: starting
Jun 25 13:15:33 pcflight named[194]: cache zone "" (IN) loaded (serial 0)
Jun 25 13:15:33 pcflight named[194]: master zone "0.0.127.in-addr.arpa" (IN)
loaded (serial 1999062301)
Jun 25 13:15:33 pcflight named[194]: master zone "pcflight.com" (IN) loaded
(serial 1999062302)
Jun 25 13:15:33 pcflight named[194]: master zone "14.192.209.in-addr.arpa"
(IN) loaded (serial 1999062301)
Jun 25 13:15:33 pcflight named[194]: listening on [127.0.0.1].53 (lo)
Jun 25 13:15:33 pcflight named[194]: listening on [192.168.0.1].53 (eth0)
Jun 25 13:15:33 pcflight named[194]: listening on [209.192.14.68].53 (eth1)
Jun 25 13:15:33 pcflight named[194]: Forwarding source address is
[0.0.0.0].1024
Jun 25 13:15:33 pcflight named[198]: Ready to answer queries.
Jun 25 13:15:40 pcflight lpd[240]: restarted
Jun 25 13:15:41 pcflight named[198]: sysquery: findns error (NXDOMAIN) on
dns1.knology.net.14.192.209.in-addr.arpa?
Jun 25 13:15:47 pcflight /usr/sbin/cron[281]: (CRON) STARTUP (fork ok)
Jun 25 13:16:06 pcflight named[198]: Sent NOTIFY for "pcflight.com IN SOA"
(pcflight.com); 1 NS, 1 A
Don't understand the log entry at 13:15:41 and also the one at 13:16:06 gets
sent quit often and I have not made changes to any of the named files..
Sample 2.
Jun 26 04:23:48 pcflight named[198]: Cleaned cache of 2 RRs
Jun 26 04:23:48 pcflight named[198]: USAGE 930385428 930335028
CPU=0.59u/0.37s CHILDCPU=0u/0s
Jun 26 04:23:48 pcflight named[198]: NSTATS 930385428 930335028 A=307 PTR=11
MX=3 ANY=6
Jun 26 04:23:48 pcflight named[198]: XSTATS 930385428 930335028 RR=333
RNXD=62 RFwdR=248 RDupR=1 RFail=0 RFErr=0 RErr=1 RAXFR=0 RLame=13 ROpts=0
SSysQ=57 SAns=82 SFwdQ=203 SDupQ=90 SErr=0 RQ=327 RIQ=0 RFwdQ=0 RDupQ=47
RTCP=0 SFwdR=248 SFail=0 SFErr=0 SNaAns=63 SNXD=5
Jun 26 04:43:46 pcflight -- MARK --
Jun 26 05:03:46 pcflight -- MARK --
Jun 26 05:23:46 pcflight -- MARK --
Jun 26 05:23:48 pcflight named[198]: Cleaned cache of 1 RR
Jun 26 05:23:48 pcflight named[198]: USAGE 930389028 930335028
CPU=0.6u/0.37s CHILDCPU=0u/0s
Jun 26 05:23:48 pcflight named[198]: NSTATS 930389028 930335028 A=311 PTR=11
MX=3 ANY=6
Jun 26 05:23:48 pcflight named[198]: XSTATS 930389028 930335028 RR=337
RNXD=66 RFwdR=252 RDupR=1 RFail=0 RFErr=0 RErr=1 RAXFR=0 RLame=13 ROpts=0
SSysQ=57 SAns=82 SFwdQ=207 SDupQ=90 SErr=0 RQ=331 RIQ=0 RFwdQ=0 RDupQ=47
RTCP=0 SFwdR=252 SFail=0 SFErr=0 SNaAns=63 SNXD=5
Jun 26 05:43:46 pcflight -- MARK --
Jun 26 06:03:46 pcflight -- MARK --
Jun 26 06:23:46 pcflight -- MARK --
Jun 26 06:23:48 pcflight named[198]: Cleaned cache of 1 RR
Jun 26 06:23:48 pcflight named[198]: USAGE 930392628 930335028
CPU=0.61u/0.37s CHILDCPU=0u/0s
Jun 26 06:23:48 pcflight named[198]: NSTATS 930392628 930335028 A=315 PTR=11
MX=3 ANY=6
Jun 26 06:23:48 pcflight named[198]: XSTATS 930392628 930335028 RR=341
RNXD=70 RFwdR=256 RDupR=1 RFail=0 RFErr=0 RErr=1 RAXFR=0 RLame=13 ROpts=0
SSysQ=57 SAns=82 SFwdQ=211 SDupQ=90 SErr=0 RQ=335 RIQ=0 RFwdQ=0 RDupQ=47
RTCP=0 SFwdR=256 SFail=0 SFErr=0 SNaAns=63 SNXD=5
Now just last night this entry at 04:43:46 started and is repeating its
self... I cant find reference to either of these problems in anything I
have read so far... I need help!!!
Also how do I stop these entries going into the /var/log/messages log and
perhaps redirect the out put to a new log file and have it automatically
print it's display in one of the Logon screens..
Sorry for this long post.. If I have offended anyone or violated some size
of post rule I indeed am sorry....
Thanks Ed
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Frederik Meerwaldt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: at.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Henryk Paluch's Lexmark 5700 Printer driver
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 16:43:08 +0200
Hi all,
I've got the latest version of Henryk Paluch's Lexmark 5700 Printer
Driver for Linux.
I compiled as he wrote (Make (then) Make install). I'm using SuSE 6.0
Now he wrote in his readme that I have to change the /etc/printcap file.
The problem is that I'll access this printer via network because it's
connected to a remote NT machine. (It won't matter if I have to use TCP/IP
Printing or Samba (NetBios printing (I think)). What entry do I need to do
in the /etc/printcap file???
I'm a total newbie (using Linux for 4 Days ;-)) and I'm happy that I
configured X-Windows correctly. Now my only prob is the printer.
Thanks in advance for answer, (via E-Mail, too if it is possible.)
Freddy
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
