Linux-Networking Digest #693, Volume #11 Sun, 27 Jun 99 15:13:41 EDT
Contents:
netatalk startup error SuSE 6.1 ("John J. Budd III, MD")
Linux to Linux Slow (Barnaby DiAnni)
Re: Why not C++ (John E. Davis)
Re: Why not C++ (John E. Davis)
Re: CR LF in Linux and Windows NT (Robert Pearce)
Connecting to a WAN (Evan Panagiotopoulos)
Re: NE2000 nic, how to turn off pnp (Bob)
Re: IP masquerading on a WAN (Daniel Wilson)
3270 from Linux to IBM Mainframe via IPX/SPX (Claude Houle)
Re: FTP using Netscape (Marc Mutz)
Help - second server on Netware 4.1 (Rond Kstar)
Re: reverse name lookup - how 2 in linux?? (Bob)
Linux Server Win95 client ("DAVID M MCNAMARA")
Re: Why not C++ ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
ISP Newcomer Needs Help (Alphatee)
NFS (Eran Dvey-Aharon)
Re: wanted: costs calculation program for proxy-server users ("Maarten..")
Re: wanted: costs calculation program for proxy-server users ("Maarten..")
Re: DNS setup problem ("Michael Faurot")
ISP Newcomer Needs Help (Alphatee)
Re: Linux to Linux Slow (mist)
Re: IP address binding to interface device .. (shyam)
3C515 NIC probs ("Don Awalt")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "John J. Budd III, MD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: netatalk startup error SuSE 6.1
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 10:59:20 -0500
I recently installed SuSE 6.1 and have been trying to get netatalk to
function but I am ending with the following error:
altair4:/etc # atalk/rc.atalk
starting appletalk daemons: atalkdnbp_rgstr: Connection timed out
Can't register altair4:Workstation@*
nbp_rgstr: Connection timed out
Can't register altair4:netatalk@*
nbprgstr papd afpd.
I have read the instructions on a website
http://thehamptons.com/anders/netatalk/ but I am still running into
trouble. Has anyone run into this error? My kernel is compiled with
appletalk support. JJB
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 07:06:16 -1000
From: Barnaby DiAnni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux to Linux Slow
Hello,
I have been puzzling over this for a few days,
and I am hoping for solution.
Please select a fixed width font to make
sense of this.
!-----------------------+---------------------
! Cable Modem
! |
! +--------+--------+
! | 10Mbps HUB |
! | Netgear EN104 |
! +--+-----------+--+
! | |
! +----------+ +----------+
! | |
! +----+----+ +-----------------+ +----+----+
! | eth0 | | | | eth0 |
! |Linux Box| | 100Mbps HUB | |Linux Box|
! | eth1 +--+ Netgear DS108 +--+eth1 |
! +---------+ | | +---------+
! +--------+--------+
! |
! +--------+--------+
! | Windows 98 |
! +--------+--------+
!-----------------------+-----------------------
Both Linux Boxes are multihomed.
All eth1 link lights show a 100Mbps connection.
FTP puts and get from Win 98 to both Linux Boxes
are about 2400 Kbytes per second or faster.
FTP puts and gets between the Linux boxes are about
200 Kbytes per second??
RX and TX activity is really on the 100Mbps hub.
Here is a session from Win98 to one of the Linux boxes.
ftp> bin
200 Type set to I.
ftp> get ie5win95.zip
200 PORT command successful.
150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for ie5win95.zip (25654086
bytes).
226 Transfer complete.
ftp: 25654086 bytes received in 10.49Seconds 2445.58Kbytes/sec.
ftp> put ie5win95.zip
200 PORT command successful.
150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for ie5win95.zip.
226 Transfer complete.
ftp: 25654086 bytes sent in 5.82Seconds 4407.92Kbytes/sec.
ftp>
Anyone have an idea what I'm doing wrong here?
Thanks,
Barnaby
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John E. Davis)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Why not C++
Date: 27 Jun 1999 17:32:20 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 27 Jun 1999 04:00:39 -0700, Nathan Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>No. _None_ of the interesting aspects of C++ templates can be emulated
>with the preprocessor. See http://oonumerics.org/blitz/index.html .
It depends on what you call interesting. Consider vecmin.cc from
blitz which computes the minimum element of a vector. In C, I can
define a vector type (I am not claiming that any of this is pretty):
typedef struct Vector
{
unsigned int num_elements;
int type;
#define INT_TYPE 1
#define FLOAT_TYPE 2
.
.
#define DOUBLE_TYPE 3
void *data;
/* Methods */
void delete (Vector *);
int minvector (struct Vector *, void *);
.
.
}
Vector;
extern Vector *new_vector (unsigned int size, int type);
This can be used as:
Vector = *v;
int imin;
double dmin;
v = new_vector (100, INT_TYPE);
.
.
/* Now find min */
(void) v->minvector (v, &imin);
v->delete (v);
/* Do same with a vector of doubles */
v = new_vector (1000, DOUBLE_TYPE);
.
.
(void) v->minvector (v, &dmin);
v->delete (v);
The minvector method is provided by the following code:
#define FUN min_int
#define TYPE int
#include "minvector.inc"
#define FUN min_float
#define TYPE float
#include "minvector.inc"
.
.
#define FUN min_double
#define TYPE double
#include "minvector.inc"
Here, minvector.inc is:
/* minvector.inc */
int FUN (Vector *v, TYPE *value)
{
unsigned int i, imax;
TYPE m;
TYPE *data;
if (0 == (imax = v->num_elements))
return -1;
data = (type *)v->data;
m = data[0];
for (i = 1; i < imax; i++)
if (data[i] < m) m = data[i];
*value = m;
return 0;
}
#undef FUN
#undef TYPE
--
John E. Davis Center for Space Research/AXAF Science Center
617-258-8119 One Hampshire St., Building NE80-6019
http://space.mit.edu/~davis Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John E. Davis)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Why not C++
Date: 27 Jun 1999 17:35:02 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 27 Jun 1999 04:18:29 -0700, Nathan Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Odd choice of example; Python is written in C++.
Since when? The last I check (about a month ago), it was still
written in C and there was some debate on the python newsgroup about
switching to C++.
--John
------------------------------
From: Robert Pearce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: CR LF in Linux and Windows NT
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:10:06 +0100
In article <7l1nk7$2fh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Hustava
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>Get a text editor that will properly handle Unix text files. I replace
>Windows' notepad.exe with a free text editor called Programmer's File Editor.
>I've even edited passwd files and bootptabs with PFE and it doesn't trash
>them. PFE also handles very large files, supports macros, and will convert
>DOS/Windows text files to Unix text files.
I wouldn't like to swear to this, but I believe wordpad (which comes
with Win 95) handles Unix text files.
--
Rob Pearce
The "from" must be wrong, nothing that helpful ever comes from the TAN team!
------------------------------
From: Evan Panagiotopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Connecting to a WAN
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 01:22:32 -0400
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============39945BF9F1E371CF15A72CFD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I have 18 W95 machines connected to a Linux computer. That computer
served me very well as a file, and web server. In my school they have
begun installing a WAN. Everything is done with a lot of secrecy, and
no one has any answers to my questions! I would like to connect one
or more Linux computers to the WAN. What information do I need to
have? Can I connect the Linux without having an IP address for each
computer? Technicians install Novell on each client and connect them
through cat 5 cable to a hub. I can't tell where the other side of the
hub is going. I looked in Windows 95 Network properties and I didn't
see any IP addresses.
HELP.....
Evan P...
==============39945BF9F1E371CF15A72CFD
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="evanp.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Evan Panagiotopoulos
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="evanp.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Panagiotopoulos;Evan
tel;fax:(914) 457-4056
tel;home:Home Sweet Home
tel;work:Valley Central High School (914) 457-3122
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
org:Valley Central High School;Mathematics Department
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Computer Teacher
fn:Evan Panagiotopoulos
end:vcard
==============39945BF9F1E371CF15A72CFD==
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob)
Subject: Re: NE2000 nic, how to turn off pnp
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 17:24:25 GMT
xphile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I don't know if you can download the appropriate software, but you can buy
>a new NE2000 for $10 and it will have a disk with the software you need.
>
>-Dave
>
i really hate to flame anyone trying to help someone - BUT -
i'm tired of hearing "just go buy a new xyz - it only costs $abc"
for many people (including me) it's not about having it work -
but about the experience in GETTING it to work.
I would think (hope), that by now everyone knows they can
buy xyz for only $abc - I would assume - (assume) that they're
asking the Q's to LEARN the WHY's & HOW[-to's]....
ne way - my $.02!!!
PS:
in the spirit of our govenment - please remit to me the amount
of $10 for my $.02!!!!!
________________________________________________
Definition of Windows 95:
A 32 bit upgrade to 16 bit extensions for an 8 bit operating system
designed to run on a 4 bit processor by a 2 bit company that
doesn't like 1 bit of competition.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I was given a machine that seems to have a Novell ne2000 isa pnp card
>> inside, but I don't have any of the software that came with the card. It
>> seems that I have to turn off pnp for this card to be recognized by
>> linux. I have changed the jumper settings to a specific irq on the card
>> itself but that does not seem to work, windows still picks it up as pnp.
>> Is there any utility for dos that I can download that will let me turn
>> off pnp for this card and assign it an irq? Is there any other way to do
>> it? Thanks,
>>
>> gary
>>
>> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Daniel Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP masquerading on a WAN
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 17:51:31 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi..
>
> We have a network with a set of 192.168.x.x
> addresses connected to the internet via a linux
> box(192.168.2.1) using ip masquerading. Now we
> have subnetted the 192.168.x.x into multiple n/w
> using a subnet of 255.255.255.0 Each network is at
> a different location connected on a WAN lin using
> routers. I still want the users on the WAN link to
> use IP masquerading of this linux server and get
> on to the internet for various applications.. only
> proxying works.. any solutions..??
What are you using to do the masquerading, the old ipfw or new ipchains
?
perhaps it would be useful to post your attempted rule/chain sets and
see if anyone could spot the problem.
*************
Dan
------------------------------
From: Claude Houle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 3270 from Linux to IBM Mainframe via IPX/SPX
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 17:41:51 GMT
Does anyone know if it is possible to connect to an IBM Mainframe via
IPX/SPX from Linux? I suspect that x3270 only supports TCP/IP but if
someone can show me another way, I would be greatly appreciative.
At present, I have to dual boot into Win95 just to dial into work. I use
Personal Communications/3270, also known as PCOMM.
C Houle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 18:49:52 +0200
From: Marc Mutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: FTP using Netscape
See, David?
Your hints made MAKZ speechless... :-)
MAKZ wrote:
>
<snipped double quoted stuff>
Marc
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rond Kstar)
Subject: Help - second server on Netware 4.1
Date: 27 Jun 1999 17:54:41 GMT
I'm trying to add a linux box as a second server to a Netare 4.1 file server
with about 10 Win 95 clients. My server is recognized in the ipx system but I
can't figure out how to log in.
As a system client, I was able to access the Netware server once I figured out
the right context. But, the linux server shows up as grayed out on the Win95
client login windows. I'm not sure if I have a Netware bindery problem (the
guy who set up the network and understands Netware is long gone) or if there is
a mars_nwe compatibility problem with Netware 4.1 Do I need to use the Caldera
Netware software?
I have tried most of the approaches in the ipx, intranet and other HOW-TO's and
am now reduced to random thrashing. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks for your time.
Ron Davis
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: reverse name lookup - how 2 in linux??
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:22:04 GMT
tx very much! - i knew there was something - but couldn't remember!
bg
________________________________________________
Definition of Windows 95:
A 32 bit upgrade to 16 bit extensions for an 8 bit operating system
designed to run on a 4 bit processor by a 2 bit company that
doesn't like 1 bit of competition.
Cameron Burley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bob, do:
>host 207.77.89.4
>or:
>nslookup
>207.77.89.4
>
>that should do a reverse dns lookup on those ip addresses
>
>Bob wrote:
>
>> how do you get the system name from an ip address?
>>
>> iow : reverse dns lookup
>>
>> with windows you can ping -a;
>>
>> what about unix?
>> isn't there a separate command?
>>
>> obviously, i've already man'd ping, & it's not there.
>>
>> tia - bg
>> ________________________________________________
>> Definition of Windows 95:
>>
>> A 32 bit upgrade to 16 bit extensions for an 8 bit operating system
>> designed to run on a 4 bit processor by a 2 bit company that
>> doesn't like 1 bit of competition.
------------------------------
From: "DAVID M MCNAMARA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux Server Win95 client
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 13:59:58 -0400
I have connected my linux box to the internet , now how do i connect my 95
box to the linix box so they can share the internet connection i'm using red
hat 5
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why not C++
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 18:02:24 GMT
In comp.os.linux.development.system Nathan Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>Bruce Hoult <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>
:>But what others are saying is "a lot of existing C++ compilers generate
:>worse code than a lot of existing C compilers". And they are right too.
:>
:>Sometimes theory matters. Sometimes it doesn't. The world is not as
:>simple as you make it out to be.
: Enough generalities. Take for example Egcs. C and C++, same code
: generator, same optimizer. The last time you tried g++ was years
: and years ago. It's time to look again.
Using the latest egcs (from CVS) to compile a C program, with options
'-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -O2', the C assembler output is still
smaller (in terms of # of instructions, not symbol length) while
producing the same results.
C++ is still slower and bulkier.
Jeff
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alphatee)
Subject: ISP Newcomer Needs Help
Date: 27 Jun 1999 18:09:35 GMT
I have been given the task of creating and or becoming an ISP. I do not know
anything about this bounty and would appreciate any direction as to where to
start and where to go. I have yet to know where to start and what I need to
know.
I have been reading about TCP/IP, Routers among others. I would appreciate who,
where and how to buy necessary equipments. I need to start ASAP. My initial
customer base is estimated to be 500 people. I need an immdiate help.
------------------------------
From: Eran Dvey-Aharon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NFS
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 19:10:16 +0300
I am mounting from my linux redhat 6.0 other non-linux unix systems by
NFS.
There is some mess up with the uid and gid, cause I can't access into
directories I should have permision too.
Any solution other than NIS ?
Instructions how to use NIS ?
Thanks.
------------------------------
From: "Maarten.." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: nl.internet.providers
Subject: Re: wanted: costs calculation program for proxy-server users
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 14:22:10 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1st of all: Do not post this to newsgroups that are not related...
2nd:
You proxy program probably already logs (or can log) all requests. for 40 people
you get a big log.
Some proxy program already come with a log ananlyser. check that one out first.
if nog you can use a external loganalyser. I beta tested sawmill at
www.flowerfire.com. It is payware, but unregistered it can process also
considerable logs.
Maarten
Ruud Prein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the moment, I am installing a Linux proxy server for 40 people. The server
> What I am looking for now is a 'program' which can gather all information on
> the users of the IntraNet, what and how log they have used the Internet
> (provided by the server) and calculate the costs per user of the IntraNet.
>
------------------------------
From: "Maarten.." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: nl.internet.providers
Subject: Re: wanted: costs calculation program for proxy-server users
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 14:22:18 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1st of all: Do not post this to newsgroups that are not related...
2nd:
You proxy program probably already logs (or can log) all requests. for 40 people
you get a big log.
Some proxy program already come with a log ananlyser. check that one out first.
if nog you can use a external loganalyser. I beta tested sawmill at
www.flowerfire.com. It is payware, but unregistered it can process also
considerable logs.
Maarten
Ruud Prein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the moment, I am installing a Linux proxy server for 40 people. The server
> What I am looking for now is a 'program' which can gather all information on
> the users of the IntraNet, what and how log they have used the Internet
> (provided by the server) and calculate the costs per user of the IntraNet.
>
------------------------------
From: "Michael Faurot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DNS setup problem
Date: 27 Jun 1999 15:43:58 GMT
Harry Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I hope someone can point me in the right direction. I have two PC's
: networked at home 1 running Mandrake 6.0 the other Win95. the 95 PC
: doesn't need to connect through my Linux PC to the Internet.
: I have in my resolv.conf file
: domain one.net.au
: search one.net.au
: nameserver 203.17.244.11
: nameserver 203.17.244.12
[...]
: I KNOW it is a DNS problem but what? Should I make up a domain for my
: PC rather than making it the same as my ISP? Should I use the IP
: numbers of the two I get a response from when I try to ping
: 203.17.244.11? Is there something else I need to check?
Looks like you need to talk with your ISP. From what I can tell on
this side, 203.17.244.11 and 203.17.244.12 are not name servers:
==============================================================================
$ nslookup www.yahoo.com 203.17.244.11
*** Can't find server name for address 203.17.244.11: No response from server
*** Default servers are not available
==============================================================================
However, the above, may not be conclusive proof as that machine could
be firewalled or designed not to resolve for outside systems.
But, from doing the following:
==============================================================================
$ nslookup -ty=any one.net.au
Non-authoritative answer:
one.net.au nameserver = red.one.net.au
one.net.au nameserver = orange.one.net.au
Authoritative answers can be found from:
one.net.au nameserver = red.one.net.au
one.net.au nameserver = orange.one.net.au
red.one.net.au internet address = 203.17.224.11
orange.one.net.au internet address = 203.17.224.12
==============================================================================
I note that names servers "red" and "orange" are at these addresses:
203.17.224.11
203.17.224.12
Whereas you were using these addresses above:
203.17.244.11
203.17.244.12
See the difference? :)
--
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alphatee)
Subject: ISP Newcomer Needs Help
Date: 27 Jun 1999 18:09:14 GMT
I have been given the task of creating and or becoming an ISP. I do not know
anything about this bounty and would appreciate any direction as to where to
start and where to go. I have yet to know where to start and what I need to
know.
I have been reading about TCP/IP, Routers among others. I would appreciate who,
where and how to buy necessary equipments. I need to start ASAP. My initial
customer base is estimated to be 500 people. I need an immdiate help.
------------------------------
From: mist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux to Linux Slow
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 19:19:16 +0100
Reply-To: mist <new$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Barnaby DiAnni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that -
>
>Hello,
>
>I have been puzzling over this for a few days,
>and I am hoping for solution.
>
>Please select a fixed width font to make
>sense of this.
>
>!-----------------------+---------------------
>! Cable Modem
>! |
>! +--------+--------+
>! | 10Mbps HUB |
>! | Netgear EN104 |
>! +--+-----------+--+
>! | |
>! +----------+ +----------+
>! | |
>! +----+----+ +-----------------+ +----+----+
>! | eth0 | | | | eth0 |
>! |Linux Box| | 100Mbps HUB | |Linux Box|
>! | eth1 +--+ Netgear DS108 +--+eth1 |
>! +---------+ | | +---------+
>! +--------+--------+
<snip>
>Both Linux Boxes are multihomed.
>All eth1 link lights show a 100Mbps connection.
>FTP puts and get from Win 98 to both Linux Boxes
>are about 2400 Kbytes per second or faster.
>
>FTP puts and gets between the Linux boxes are about
>200 Kbytes per second??
>
>
>Anyone have an idea what I'm doing wrong here?
>
Perhaps the Linux boxes are defaulting to using the route via eth0 and
are going through the slower hub. Try swapping the hubs or NIC cables
around and seeing if the speeds change. At the very least you might
notice a problem when you set up the new routes.
--
Mist.
------------------------------
From: shyam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: IP address binding to interface device ..
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 20:39:09 +0200
Hello,
Thanks for the pointer.
However my comments are marked by <SS>
Chandrashekhar a �crit:
> shyam wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > I am trying to understand why does the internet address bind to the
> > interface in IP suite of protocols. In my limited knowledge , other
> > protocols do not have this limitation.
> How else will you identify a device on the network? Ultimately, a packet
> is sent to a destination by mapping the IP address to the interface
> address, in the last lap of its journey. Which other protocols are you
> referring to.
>
<SS> IMHO we need to identify the machine to the network , not the different
interfaces that the machine has. For example if the system had 2 ethernets ,
I could designate that the machine's address is x.y.z.a rather than to the
different interfaces ( a.b.c.d to eth0 and u.v.w.x to eth1 ). From my
understanding of DECnet ( of course it uses its own routing protocol ), it
supports a mechanism that the address is the machine's not the interfaces.
This way if a single machine has multiple interfaces , it is able to provide
multiple paths and also can perform load balancing.
> > For eg., in a machine with dual ethernets , it is imperative that they
> > have different ip addresses. Thus , you cannot have load sharing or
> > failover capabilities between the connected machines in spite of the
> > having more than one physical network.
> Sorry - but do you mean more than one interface card for a device??
> Failover capabilities are provided by a product called MC-Service Guard.
> And I'm sure there are many more.
<SS> Yes , more than one interface card per machine. Sorry I have not been
clear enough. But, what I mean is for eg, 2 ethernet devices ( eth0, eth1
active ) in one system ( physically these could be on one card or on multiple
cards ). I will check out MC-Gaurd, but the systems that I have seen provide
an IP failover capability, for eg., if by some detection mechanism you find
that eth0 failed , you now disable eth0 through some scripts and activate
eth1 with the same ip address that eth0 had. But this mechanism does not
provide for load balancing.
Thanks & Cheers !
shyam
> hth,
> Chandru
>
> --
> Ericsson Systems Expertise Ltd., Athlone, Ireland.
> Tel: +353 902 31816
------------------------------
From: "Don Awalt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.redhat
Subject: 3C515 NIC probs
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 18:25:12 GMT
Anyone successfully running on the NIC 3C515-TX? Autoprobe did not find it,
I am kinda lost on how to get the card recognized in RH 6.0...
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
