Linux-Networking Digest #704, Volume #11 Mon, 28 Jun 99 12:13:32 EDT
Contents:
Re: strange faxgetty-message (Mike Jagdis)
Re: Ethernet Card ("Colin Macfarlane")
Re: Why not C++ (Isaac)
Transmit errors with Samba (Kai Zahradka)
Re: NFS remote install problems ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: DNS setup problem (Harry Phillips)
Re: LinkSys NIC LNE100TX: Anybody have any problems with this card? (Rod Smith)
pppd with 'demand' option (Salvador =?iso-8859-1?Q?Main=E9=20L=F3pez?=)
Re: Diablo & IP Masq ("Jeff Volckaert")
Re: leafnode ("Daniel Wagner")
Re: leafnode (Greg Weeks)
Re: LinkSys NIC LNE100TX: Anybody have any problems with this card? (Jeffrey Scott)
tests ("moi")
Re: Help with setting up POP3 server (Villy Kruse)
The best route ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: The best route (Lew Pitcher)
DHCP and IP Masquerading (Ron Copeland)
Re: inetd, ftpd, and telnetd (Duncan Simpson)
Re: truncated-ip in tcpdump (Duncan Simpson)
Re: ipmasqeurading (NightFever)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Jagdis)
Subject: Re: strange faxgetty-message
Date: 28 Jun 1999 11:46:39 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <7l4u7d$v69$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Falk Seyboldt wrote:
>
>when i start faxgetty with .../faxgetty /dev/modem it sends a
>message to the messages-log saying:
>"can not deduce identification of uucp"
>
>because i'm working with a SuSE distribution, the user uucp
>and the group uucp can be seen in yast.
However the only time this message (or at least one very
similar to it :-) ) is generated is when a getpwnam("uucp")
fails.
Mike
--
A train stops at a train station, a bus stops at a bus station.
On my desk I have a work station...
.----------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Mike Jagdis | Internet: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Roan Technology Ltd. | |
| 2 Markham Mews, Broad Street | Telephone: +44 118 989 0403 |
| Wokingham ENGLAND | Fax: +44 118 989 1195 |
`----------------------------------------------------------------------'
------------------------------
From: "Colin Macfarlane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Ethernet Card
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:53:23 -0300
tkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:qnBd3.15899$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have the Etherlink XL TPO NIC(3c900B) ethernet card. I was woundering if
> this is supported by Redhat linux 5.2 as i can see the 3c900 is supported.
>
> Also is there anybody out there who knows how to get a cable modem working
> on redhat 5.2
>
I got the same card given to me when ADSL installed. Call it a 3c9x card
and it will be happy. I suspect once the 1's and 0's get to the NIC from
the cable modem it will work the same as ADSL.
Some annoying pitfalls from just filling in the URLs for the card and the
cable modem/isp DNS occurred afterwards. Go into linuxconf and tell the
adapter to use bootp vice manual, and also tick the box that says DNS
required that is above it. These are not shown on the install routine.
RH6/Mandrake changes the linuxconf a bit, and I had a *wonderful* time
installing because it will only auto probe for one NIC [no matter what
ether=blah blah I tried], and would find the LAN ne2k clone on IRQ9. Don't
bother setting up the network on install, do it via linuxconf, and if you
have two NICs LIE A BIT. I told the system to use the 3c509 driver and that
it was on IRQ 10 just to make it probe, and then it goes and does the
correct thing as PCI NICs will report themselves. Not elegant, but it
worked.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Isaac)
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Why not C++
Date: 28 Jun 1999 12:53:51 GMT
On Mon, 28 Jun 1999 07:55:12 +0200, Thomas Stuefe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> In my opinion, the only thing that C++ has over C is
>>>better support for data encapsulation via classes and, possibly,
>>>exception handling.
>
>Only is good.
>
I think the argument that the syntactical differences aren't compelling
is supportable, although I don't agree with it. But even after dismissing
things like // comments, declaring variables at point of use, class names
as types, etc. I still find the following 5 things the most compelling
reasons to use C++ over C (roughly in decreasing order of importance)
1) Data Encapsulation
2) Inheritance
3) Polymorphism
4) STL library
5) Templates
Exception handling didn't make the list, but it's not far behind.
Name spaces didn't make the list, but I like them too.
I'm partially convinced that references and operator overloading are
negative features (except for new and delete) so I avoid overloading
which cuts down on the need for references too. I don't use
references simply to clean up syntax, but others do find it useful.
Isaac
------------------------------
From: Kai Zahradka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Transmit errors with Samba
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:20:27 +0200
Hi,
we have a nt-network with an linux server. the server linux is suse 6.1
and the running samba server is 2.0.3. When any nt-client copy/read an
file
(not a directory) to/from the server an transmit error status shows in
the
messages log file.
bye kai
--
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
form & vision gmbh . eclipse - imagetools
. http://www.formvision.de
.
kai zahradka . developer
.
.
mail . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone . +49 69 - 82 97 30 - 39
fax . +49 69 - 88 77 65
.
.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NFS remote install problems
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:20:17 GMT
I don't have an nfsd running either, I have nfs, and it is on port
2049. Check the /etc/services file to find out which port nfs should
be running on.
>From the syslog it sounds to me as though your entry in the exports
file may have problems. You would have to make sure that the machine
you are mounting from will be able to talk to the mahcine you are
building (hosts file, NIS, DNS depending on setup). If you want to
test the export, and you don't mind leaving a security hole for the
duration of the test set the exports entry for your CD-ROM path to
(rw,insecure). With this entry any system identified by the nfs server
will be allowed to mount the CD-ROM.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jim Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gordon,
>
> thank you for replying. I'm afraid mounting the CD-ROM to others
boxes is
> not an option. But here are a few details I left out in my previous
message:
>
> Exports file seems to be set up correctly and so does daemon mountd.
Deamon
> nfsd seems to have some problems though. I seemed to have read
somewhere
> that when executing rpcinfo -p I should see
>
> 100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper
> 100000 2 udp 111 portmapper
> 100005 1 tcp 744 mountd
> 100005 2 udp 744 mountd
> 100005 1 tcp 747 nfsd
> 100005 2 udp 747 nfsd
>
> But when I do, I seem to be missing
>
> 100005 2 udp 747 nfsd
>
> Syslog looks fine except for:
>
> mountd[63]: exports file has anon
entries, but
> host
> mountd[63]: has non-private IP address
> 200.200.200.1!
> nfsd[68]: Could not bind name to socket
> 0.0.0.0:2049: A$
> nfsd[68]: could not make a udp socket
> nfsd[65]: Unauthorized access by NFS
client
> 200.200.200.9
>
> NOTE: 200.200.200.9 is the IP address of server 2, ie. the one I'm
trying
> to install Linux on.
>
> Hope you can help... I running out of options here ;-)#
>
> Jim.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Can you mount the CD-ROM to other machines? If you can mount it to
> > other boxes you should have no problem getting the install started
(I
> > have occasionally gotten errors during the install via nfs mount
which
> > don't seem to happen with local CD-ROMs).
> >
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Jim Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello there,
> > >
> > > I'm having trouble installing Linux via remote install.
> > >
> > > Consider the following:
> > > ===============
> > >
> > > Server 1 Linux 2.0.29 up and running with a mounted CD-ROM
> > > Server 2 Installation in progress
> > >
> > > Problem:
> > > ======
> > >
> > > From Server 2, I'm trying to install Linux via Remote Install, ie
from
> > > CD-ROM mounted on Server 1. On Server 1, exports file seems to be
set
> > up
> > > correctly and so does deamons mountd and nfsd. When trying to
install
> > I
> > > get the following error message :
> > >
> > > nfs_fhget: getattr error = 13
> > > nfs_read_super: get root inode failed
> > > mount: wrong fs type or bad superblock
on
> > >
> > server1:/cdrom/slackware/slakware
> > >
> > > Can someone please help.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance.
> > >
> > > Jim.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> > Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Harry Phillips)
Subject: Re: DNS setup problem
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:19:43 GMT
Please stop sending me mail about my typo
I now know that I just wasted a weekend and countless phone calls
because of one little mistake.
My name server should have been
203.17.224.11 instead of
203.17.244.11
^
Regards
Harry
On Sun, 27 Jun 1999 07:06:00 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Harry
Phillips) wrote:
>Hi
>
>I hope someone can point me in the right direction. I have two PC's
>networked at home 1 running Mandrake 6.0 the other Win95. the 95 PC
>doesn't need to connect through my Linux PC to the Internet.
>
>I have in my resolv.conf file
>domain one.net.au
>search one.net.au
>nameserver 203.17.244.11
>nameserver 203.17.244.12
>
>my hosts.conf file is
>order hosts,bind
>multi on
>
>I can dial my ISP and connect ok I get my local IP address and the
>remote address is the default gateway.
>
>When I try to ping the first DNS server (203.17.244.11) I keep getting
>duplicate replies from two other IP addresses. I don't get any reply
>from the second DNS server at all.
>
>I can ping IP's on the internet eg 137.82.43.58 (axion.phyics.ubc.ca)
>but when I try and ping say www.novell.com.au I get can't resolve IP
>address.
>
>I KNOW it is a DNS problem but what? Should I make up a domain for my
>PC rather than making it the same as my ISP? Should I use the IP
>numbers of the two I get a response from when I try to ping
>203.17.244.11? Is there something else I need to check?
>
>Please help I am sick of Microsoft's arrogance and need to flee to the
>land of the free!!!
>
>Regards
>Harry
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rod Smith)
Subject: Re: LinkSys NIC LNE100TX: Anybody have any problems with this card?
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:24:52 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Posted and mailed]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lewis) writes:
> Thanks for the info. I'll probably go ahead and get it at CompUsa,
> since I believe they have a fairly liberal return policy.
Not any more. At least, not the one in Woburn, Massachusetts (just north
of Boston). Now they carve out a restocking fee if you return is for any
reason other than defective merchandise. Micro Center's much better that
way, at least the one near me.
--
Rod Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.channel1.com/users/rodsmith
NOTE: Remove the "uce" word from my address to mail me
Author of _Special Edition Using WordPerfect for Linux_, from Que;
see http://www.channel1.com/users/rodsmith/books.html
------------------------------
From: Salvador =?iso-8859-1?Q?Main=E9=20L=F3pez?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pppd with 'demand' option
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:08:43 +0200
Someone kowns how to use pppd with on-demand dialing capabilities?
I can manage to make pppd dial but not to mantain it (the modem connect
but hangs in seconds)
Thanks
--
Salvador Main� L�pez
CentroRed SL - Desarrollos
http://www.centrored.com
------------------------------
From: "Jeff Volckaert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: redhat.networking.general
Subject: Re: Diablo & IP Masq
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:13:33 -0400
You can't have more than one Diablo player behind the firewall. I had this
working once with a three player game. I could see the guy from the Net but
not from the LAN. The guy from the Net could see both of us. Pretty funny
seeing items drop from the sky.
Any way, here's my single user diablo.scr:
ipautofw -A -r tcp 6112 6112 -h 192.168.0.150
ipautofw -A -r udp 6112 6112 -h 192.168.0.150
Jeff Volckaert
Dave Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> [[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
> the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tyler Andersen
> <tyler*no@spam*hexicon-systems.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm having a problem getting Diablo to connect to Battle.Net through
ip
> > masquerading. I have tried the commands listed at the Masq Apps site,
and I
> > still can't get it to work. I have tried it on two different machines,
both
> > running kernel 2.2.5 (RedHat 6.0), one stock, the other recompiled with
> > various options. Neither one worked. Masquerading works fine, it's just
> > Diablo that isn't working. Here are the commands I tried:
> >
> > /sbin/ipmasqadm autofw -A -r udp 6112 6112 -c tcp 116
> > /sbin/ipmasqadm autofw -A -r udp 6112 6112 -c tcp 118
> >
> > When I use this command:
> >
> > /sbin/ipmasqadm autofw -A -r udp 6112 6112 -h 192.168.100.50
> >
> > it works fine. However, this won't work for my situation. I need to have
it
> > work on every IP in the 10.x.x.x range.
>
> Hmm, I'm hoping someone will correct me and tell me I'm wrong, but with
> port mapping like this, you can't send it to a range, you can only send
> it to a specific IP address. What's happening here is that you're
> getting what appear to Linux as "unsolicited" packets on port 6112. It
> doesn't realize that they're due to you playing a game with someone, so
> it just ignores them since there's no service running on that port.
> However, you (of course) want this traffic routed back to your masq'ed
> machines, so you have to put a port mapping out there. Problem is,
> there's no way for Linux to tell which machine should get this (on the
> fly), so you have to tell it -- and that's where the problems begin.
>
> Am I wrong??
>
> -Dave
------------------------------
From: "Daniel Wagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: leafnode
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:30:49 +0200
Good guest, my version is 1.7, i'll try to upgrade to a newer one
Daniel.
--=20
Java rulz! Linux rulz!
E-Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 41472160
WWW: http://www.computer.privateweb.at/daniel.wagner/
------------------------------
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Weeks)
Subject: Re: leafnode
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:20:49 -0500
In article <7l7l5j$4gv$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Daniel Wagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello!
> I wanted to setup a local news-server for offline reading and posting in my home-LAN
>and i decided to use leafnode cause i've heard that it's easy to use, but now i've
>got several problems.
> 1. With "News-Readers" like Netscape, Krn or Outlook Express i only get the groups
>and the messagecount but no messages.
> When i subscribe to a ng it doesn't get listed in the directory
>/var/spool/news/interested.group (in leafnode documentation they wrote there should
>be a file with ng name for each subscribe ng.)
> Can anybody help me with my problem, or should i use inn for offline reading/posting?
> Thanks Daniel.
Netscape has problems. What version of leafnode are you running? 1.7.?
had problems like this with all readers.
Greg Weeks
--
http://durendal.tzo.com/greg/
------------------------------
From: Jeffrey Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: LinkSys NIC LNE100TX: Anybody have any problems with this card?
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:37:22 -0500
Just bought a LNE100TX myself...works fine after downloading, compiling,
and adding the module for the latest tulip driver from the Linksys
website.
The tulip driver that came with RH 6.0 did not work for my particular
chipset (Proprietary Linksys chip). There are a few different chipsets
for this particular card. Linksys states that the latest tulip driver
should work for all versions of their card (of course they don't
officially support Linux, but you gotta like a company that acknowledges
the existance of Linux, and provides helpful info on their website).
>
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:42:56 +0200
From: "moi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: tests
Can anyone send me back e-mails?
Please forgive me to post in your group... It's for some tests..
I need to improve my own smtp server.
Thanks a lot!
Gasp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Villy Kruse)
Subject: Re: Help with setting up POP3 server
Date: 28 Jun 1999 16:14:54 +0200
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hannu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Derek;
>Which POP3 daemon would you recommend for Linux?
>I have had qpopper going on for a long time in our Solaris boxes,
>and the new versions work very well.
>We are testing Linux as a mail server OS, any ideas with sendmail and
>pop3 would be appreciated.
If you are happy with qpopper on Solaris, by all means keep on using it
on linux.
Some distributuions (redhat) only have the ipop3d version from the pine
people.
Villy
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The best route
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:41:48 GMT
Here's the story, i need to know the best (or a
good) route to achieve this: i am going to have a
network in my fraternity house. It will have a
maximum of 13 windows 98 machines. But it will
probably have no more than 5. I need everyone to
have Interent access. I am using a Linux box,
486dx2/66 32mb ram 540mbHD which i would like to
dial-up to an ISP. I have read the FAQs, and will
configure the box to run right with ppp, thats not
the issue. I need to know what to use to get
these other's to connect to. I am assuming i need
proxy software of some sort on my linux box and
then configure netscape on the others to hit the
IP addy of the linux box as a proxy. But what
proxy server program should i use? Does one come
with Linux?? Am i going about this the totally
wrong way? Should i be using the LRP router
software? Input is greatly appreciated!! Thanx
in advance!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lew Pitcher)
Subject: Re: The best route
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:55:09 GMT
On Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:41:48 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Here's the story, i need to know the best (or a
>good) route to achieve this: i am going to have a
>network in my fraternity house. It will have a
>maximum of 13 windows 98 machines. But it will
>probably have no more than 5. I need everyone to
>have Interent access. I am using a Linux box,
>486dx2/66 32mb ram 540mbHD which i would like to
>dial-up to an ISP. I have read the FAQs, and will
>configure the box to run right with ppp, thats not
>the issue. I need to know what to use to get
>these other's to connect to. I am assuming i need
>proxy software of some sort on my linux box and
>then configure netscape on the others to hit the
>IP addy of the linux box as a proxy. But what
>proxy server program should i use? Does one come
>with Linux?? Am i going about this the totally
>wrong way? Should i be using the LRP router
>software? Input is greatly appreciated!! Thanx
>in advance!
Certainly, you can install a proxy server on the Linux box,
but it probably would be simpler to install the "IP Masquerade"
support that the native Linux firewall (ipfwadm for Linux 2.0 or
ipchains for Linux 2.2) provides. It's not difficult to set up,
and provides for more access than a proxy would.
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Lew Pitcher
System Consultant, Integration Solutions Architecture
Toronto Dominion Bank
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(Opinions expressed are my own, not my employer's.)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ron Copeland)
Subject: DHCP and IP Masquerading
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:59:09 GMT
My network consists of a server connected to the cable modem, using
DHCP of course, and the remainder of my computers have fixed
192.168.x.x addresses and connect to the internet through the server
via IP masquerading.
DHCP is working good, IP masquerading is working good, but how can I
get the nameserver info into the client's resolv.conf automatically?
I suppose I could put a nameserver on the gateway machine, but not
this week. Does anybody have another solution?
Thanks,
Ron
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Duncan Simpson)
Subject: Re: inetd, ftpd, and telnetd
Date: 28 Jun 1999 15:02:13 GMT
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hsien-neng Chou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Hi,
>I have some basic questions.
>1. A book says that Unix-like OS will always come with inetd, but why
> when I install ftp or telnet, it came out error saying that no
> inetd. After installing with --nodeps, it can telnet but not
> be telneted. Does that mean i have to get both telnetd and inetd?
> (My system is Redhat 6.0; /etc/servers exists on my system but
> /usr/etc/inetd.conf doesn't)
Last time I installed RH inetd and tcpwrappers were both installed. I
know both are on RH CDs anyway...and various places you can download source
to compile it yourself.
>2. As I know (i am a pretty new Linux user), inetd takes charge of
> managing listening daemons. Does that mean without ftpd, telnetd,
> there is no way to make my system be telneted or ftped possible?
inetd provides few services itself and these do not include telnet or
ftp. Unless you have telnetd or ftpd inetd accept the connection and
then attempt to exec an appropiate server for the connection. If there
is no such server this will not work, for various obvious reasons.
Uoi need telnetd and ftpd as well as inetd to offer telnet and ftp
(and you need inetd to run telnetd or ftpd as most versions do not
have the listen() and accept()ing capabilitiy themselves).
--
Duncan (-:
"software industry, the: unique industry where selling substandard goods is
legal and you can charge extra for fixing the problems."
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Duncan Simpson)
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: truncated-ip in tcpdump
Date: 28 Jun 1999 14:35:06 GMT
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jon Snader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Terje Trane wrote:
>>
>> Uwe Kastens wrote:
>> > No, it's ab bug in tcpdump - try a newer one
>>
>> Any suggestions for where to get one (that will work on RH5.2)?
>http://www-nrg.ee.lbl.gov/nrg.html
Or try a the bugtraq archives. Bugtraq discussed it and someone posted
a fix recently. Except RH et al to apply the patch or some equivilent
of it sometime moderately soon (or apply it your self for a faster result).
Duncan (-:
--
Duncan (-:
"software industry, the: unique industry where selling substandard goods is
legal and you can charge extra for fixing the problems."
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NightFever)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: ipmasqeurading
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:04:52 GMT
Try this:
# Setting up IP Masquerade
/sbin/depmod -a
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_ftp
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_irc
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_raudio
/sbin/ipchains -P forward DENY
/sbin/ipchains -A forward -s 192.168.11.0/24 -j MASQ
This is assuming that you have 2.2.x kernel, compiled all the modules
you have to use ipchains
The line:
/sbin/ipchains -A forward -s 192.168.11.0/24 -j MASQ
change the 192.168.11.0 to the IP you are using, since you use
192.168.0.x, you should put 192.168.0.0, the zero in the last 'dot'
tells it to masquerade the whole 192.168.0.x range.
Hope this helps
On 28 Jun 1999 11:41:13 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (F. Heitkamp) wrote:
>I'm trying to get IP masquerading working on two Linux
>boxes I have. I have a local network setup with one
>machine 192.168.0.1 and the other 192.168.0.2. 192.168.0.2
>is connect via dialup SLIP to my ISP. The local "lan" works
>fine, I'm able to telnet, ftp, etc. between the two boxes.
>I have installed a kernel with IP forwarding and aliasing
>configured on 192.168.0.2, basically following the instruction
>on http://skaro.nightcrawler.com/~bb/FW-HOWTO/FW-Howto.html.
>I'm using the same configuration as shown in "listing 1"
>with ppp0 changed to sl0. As you may have guessed the
>masquerading isn't working. Any suggestions?
>
>Fred
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
