Linux-Networking Digest #722, Volume #11         Tue, 29 Jun 99 19:13:54 EDT

Contents:
  Re: using ipautofw to forward a port to masqueraded host ("Carl Filpo")
  fdisk ("Chris Seaton")
  IP Masqeurading: help needed ("Stavros C. Kassinos")
  Swap over NFS (Andreas Jaehnigen)
  Re: problems with yppasswd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: NFS writes hang: client on 100MB, server on 10MB segment (Peter Mutsaers)
  Re: IP Masqeurading: help needed ("Stavros C. Kassinos")
  Re: 3C509 NIC and RH 5.2 ("Gregory Sherar")
  Re: unknown ip on network (Bob)
  Re: I need some help. (Job Eisses)
  Re: Banner after print job. (Walt Shekrota)
  Trying to use Linux DHCP client with Sygate (deeptendu majumder)
  Re: Why not C++ (Johan Kullstam)
  Re: ISP Newcomer Needs Help ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: tcp_timestamps=1 gives lousy networking on 2.2.x !!! (John Gardner)
  Connecting to ISP (Tomm Prickett)
  DNS cache and database (Peter Buelow)
  Re: timezone problems ("Armscor")
  Re: Banner after print job. (Walt Shekrota)
  Re: Telnet Linux->Windows question ("YouDontKnowWho")
  Re: IP address binding to interface device .. (Aaron Leonard)
  Re: Jammin' Adult Stuff 79156 ("Martin Graiter")
  Re: Add user problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply-To: "Carl Filpo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Carl Filpo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: using ipautofw to forward a port to masqueraded host
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 00:58:47 +0800

Use ipportfw

You can map a connection from A on a specific port to B on any other port
you specify


<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:7laoap$im2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> hi,
>
> i have a linux box A setup to masquerade for a windows box B
> how do i use ipautofw (or ipfwadm) to setup box A such that
> when it receives a connection on port X, it forwards that
> to port Y on box B?
>
> thanks
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.



------------------------------

From: "Chris Seaton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
ahn.tech.linux,alt.linux,alt.os.linux,alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: fdisk
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 15:31:42 -0500

    Ok I'm a Linux newbie.  I have COL 2.2 and want to create a 1.5g partion
for Linux.  Partion Magic Caldera Edition isn't flexible enough for me.  I
know to use fdisk instead then, but I dodn't know how to use it.  When the
fdisk menu came up it just scared me to death because I had no idea what I
was doing.  Could anyone walk me through the step of creating a 1.5G
partion.  Thank you.

Chris Seaton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



------------------------------

From: "Stavros C. Kassinos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP Masqeurading: help needed
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 13:56:01 -0700

I have a small home LAN consisting of two Linux (RedHat 6.0) boxes. One
of the machines is connected to the outside world via a DSL connection
with a permanent IP address and functions as the router for the other
machine. I am using IP Masquerading with ipchains. 
Things seem to work quite smoothly (I can ftp, telenet, browse from both
boxes to the oustide). However, I am not able to directly access the
second box from the outside world when I need to FTP or Telnet to it. I
am under the impression that it is impossible to achieve that since the
second box does not have a valid IP, but only has a one for local use.

Since being able to access the 2nd box directly from the outside is
improtant for what I want to accomplish I thought of checking with some
of the gurus out there to see if I have missed something. Could IP
aliasing help for this? Any suggestions?  

Thank you
Stavros
-- 
====================================================================
Stavros C. Kassinos            | e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
                               | Office: (650)-723-0546             |
Center for Turbulence Research | Fax:    (650)-723-4548             |
Stanford University            | http://www.stanford.edu/~kassinos  |
====================================================================

------------------------------

From: Andreas Jaehnigen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Swap over NFS
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 23:09:42 +0200


Hi all,

does anybody have hints on how to swap over NFS?
I've a linux client here and a Sun (running Solaris) which provides all
the directories via NFS. All's well exept for swapping! :-(
Any hints on how to export the swapfile from Solaris? Or how to import
(mount) it correctly on the Linux box? Kernel is 2.2.10 ...
At the moemnt, I've the swapfile mounted quite ordinary and loop it, then
I do a mkswap to the loop devce and then issue a swapon to it...
This seems to work, but I get several error messages like:

swapon: Unable to find swap-space signature
ll_rw_block: Trying to read non existent block-device 00:04 (0)

My /etc/fstab looks like this:

server:/fs/rboot/linux-sparc/root / nfs defaults 1 1 
server:/fs/rboot/linux-sparc/swap/ /nfsswap nfs defaults,sync 1 1
proc /proc proc defaults 0 0 
devpts /dev/pts devpts mode=0622 0 0 
server:/fs/rboot/linux-sparc/usr /usr nfs defaults 1 1 

And I'm using the following script to set up swapspace:

SWAPFILE="/nfsswap/myclientsswapfile"
echo  "Setting up swap over NFS... "
losetup /dev/loop0 $SWAPFILE
mkswap -v1 /dev/loop0
swapon /dev/loop0
mkswap -v1 /dev/loop0
swapon /dev/loop0
echo "done."

I noticed, that I had to create the swapfile TWICE (using mkswap),
otherwise it did only say 
        /dev/loop0: invalid argument
Can anyone expplain this, PLEASE???

Or can anyone, as said before, give hints on how to swap over NFS?

THANKS!!!!!
                Andi

Please CC a copy of your answer/comment via mail as well... Tnx



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problems with yppasswd
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 20:58:12 GMT

I am having the EXACT same problem - from the
server and from any client - I've run the
rpc.yppasswdd in --debug mode and gotten:

[root@rhdmzbeth3 jcolson]# /usr/sbin/rpc.yppasswdd
--debug
rpc.yppasswdd - NYS YP server version 1.3.6.91
(with CHECKROOT)
yppasswdproc_pwupdate("jcolson") [From:
209.87.161.176:1033]
Segmentation fault


If anyone else has been able to accomplish a
successfull passwd change more than once without
it abending, please reply!


In article <UAcc3.1$u3.3535@uchinews2>,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jon Bernard)
wrote:
> I'm having trouble with yppasswd (version 2.2),
under Redhat 6.0.
>
> As root on the master server, I can successfully
invoke yppasswd only
> once; thereafter I get the error message 'RPC:
Unable to receive', and
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/yppasswd status tells me that
rpc.yppasswd is
> stopped.
>
> I've pasted in the contents of my xterm below.
>
> Any help at all is appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Jon
>
> [root@pylon src]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/yppasswdd
status
> rpc.yppasswdd (pid 1445) is running...
> [root@pylon src]# yppasswd booker
> Changing NIS account information for booker on
pylon.uchicago.edu.
> Please enter root password:
> Changing NIS password for booker on
pylon.uchicago.edu.
> Please enter new password:
> Please retype new password:
>
> The NIS password has been changed on
pylon.uchicago.edu.
>
> [root@pylon src]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/yppasswdd
status
> rpc.yppasswdd is stopped
> [root@pylon src]# yppasswd booker
> Changing NIS account information for booker on
pylon.uchicago.edu.
> Please enter root password:
> Changing NIS password for booker on
pylon.uchicago.edu.
> Please enter new password:
> Please retype new password:
> RPC: Unable to receive
> The NIS password has not been changed on
pylon.uchicago.edu.
>
> [root@pylon src]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/yppasswdd
restart
> Stopping YP passwd service:
[FAILED]
> Starting YP passwd service:
[  OK  ]
>
>



Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

------------------------------

From: Peter Mutsaers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NFS writes hang: client on 100MB, server on 10MB segment
Date: 29 Jun 1999 23:21:29 +0200

>> "A" == Akira  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

    A> Peter Mutsaers wrote:

    >> >> "FB" == Frank Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
    >> 
    FB> normally, your network switch must manage the way of your data
    FB> (and also the speed of the data), so that it wouldn't in my
    FB> opinion not a problem of the kernels.....
    >> 
    >> The router & switch are OK. It works with NT NFS clients, and with
    >> FreeBSD. Linux 2.2.x seems to have a bug which shows in this
    >> circumstance (client much faster than server).

    A> I don't know if I'd call it a bug. Why would you have the
    A> server on a 10Mb segment anyway?

1. Of course this is a (serious) bug. Why on earth would it be
   acceptable that a NFS write only works when the client and server
   segments comply with certain speeds?!?

2. The server happens to be in our UNIX segment, which (alas) is 10MB;
   it is out of my control.

I find it quite amazing that this problem has come up so little and
even people don't seem to care. I know I shouldn't complain about free
software, but still, if such basic networking (NFS) doesn't work well
I'm getting some doubts on Linux. I mean, even NT clients handle this
NFS situation better than Linux.

-- 
Peter Mutsaers |  Abcoude (Utrecht), | Trust me, I know
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  the Netherlands    | what I'm doing. 

------------------------------

From: "Stavros C. Kassinos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP Masqeurading: help needed
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 14:36:32 -0700

Basically what I am trying to find out is whether it is possible (for
example) to setup IP forwarding so that when I telnet Box A (the router)
at a particular port of my choice, Box A will forward the connection to
the standard telnet port on Box B. Obviously I have some reading to do,
but at least if I know it can be done I can invest the time to learn
how. (more details in my original post below)  -- Thanks!


Stavros C. Kassinos wrote:
> 
> I have a small home LAN consisting of two Linux (RedHat 6.0) boxes. One
> of the machines is connected to the outside world via a DSL connection
> with a permanent IP address and functions as the router for the other
> machine. I am using IP Masquerading with ipchains.
> Things seem to work quite smoothly (I can ftp, telenet, browse from both
> boxes to the oustide). However, I am not able to directly access the
> second box from the outside world when I need to FTP or Telnet to it. I
> am under the impression that it is impossible to achieve that since the
> second box does not have a valid IP, but only has a one for local use.
> 
> Since being able to access the 2nd box directly from the outside is
> improtant for what I want to accomplish I thought of checking with some
> of the gurus out there to see if I have missed something. Could IP
> aliasing help for this? Any suggestions?
> 
> Thank you
> Stavros
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Stavros C. Kassinos            | e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
>                                | Office: (650)-723-0546             |
> Center for Turbulence Research | Fax:    (650)-723-4548             |
> Stanford University            | http://www.stanford.edu/~kassinos  |
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
====================================================================
Stavros C. Kassinos            | e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
                               | Office: (650)-723-0546             |
Center for Turbulence Research | Fax:    (650)-723-4548             |
Stanford University            | http://www.stanford.edu/~kassinos  |
====================================================================

------------------------------

From: "Gregory Sherar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: 3C509 NIC and RH 5.2
Date: 29 Jun 1999 17:28:38 GMT

Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Dave - followup Q for you - I've got an el3-3c509b (bnc/aui) card;
> 
> do you know where i can get the setup program for it?
> 
> i've dl'd stuff from cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov, but it does not
> mention pnp (on/off);
> 
> does anyone know where i can get a setup program?
> ANY setup program (dos/win/*nix) - that will even
> tell me if this card has pnp enabled or disabled?
> 
> tia - Bob

Get it from the 3Com web/ftp site. May be available alone or else grab the
"Superdisk" for the 3c509.
You want the 3c5x9cfg.exe program. From DOS:
3c5x9cfg /pnprst
3c5x9cfg configure /pnp:disabled


------------------------------

From: Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: unknown ip on network
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 01:25:18 +0800



A simple traceroute would show Where the address is connected to!

>From there you can gleam all sorts of info....

On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Harry Park wrote:

> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:22:33 -0400
> From: Harry Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.networking
> Subject: unknown ip on network
> 
> I run NTOP on our LAN. This LAN is part of a WAN that is firewalled.  I
> have no control over the firewall.
> I noticed an IP address had downloaded 450 megs from somewhere on my
> LAN. I tried pinging the address and
> couldn't reach it from my LAN ditto http and nslookup.
> 
> I came home and logged on to my ISP. I could ping the ip but could not
> ftp, telnet, or http to the address. Nslookup
> failed.
> 
> I should also note that NTOP reported most of the traffic asUDP.
> 
> My question is how do I figure out what happened? Is there anyway of
> determing what the IP is?
> 
> Harry
> 
> 
> 


Bob PHILLIPS
Director/System Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  ISP to the nor'west of Western Australia
                                |  http://www.norcom.net.au
Yes, I am on the interthingy    |  If it aint broke, fix it, then it will be
==========================================================================
     dotnet dotau Pty Ltd PO Box 2762 SOUTH HEDLAND WA 6722 AUSTRALIA
========================================================================== 
 


------------------------------

From: Job Eisses <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: I need some help.
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 23:30:58 +0200

Travis wrote:
> ...computers 192.168.42.0, 192.168.42.1, and 192.168.42.1.  So i did that

Make that 192.168.42.1, 192.168.42.2, 192.168.42.3 
> ...netmask and bradcast for the computers? what should i set the mtu to? do

255.255.255.0    192.168.42.255                    don't set mtu

> ...i need to make a dns? 

Not yet

> ...supposed to goto ppp0 was going to eth0 how can i prevent internet stuff
> from trying to go over the network eth0 and going to ppp0 but still have

route add -net default ppp0

                                have patience             -job

------------------------------

From: Walt Shekrota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Banner after print job.
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 21:46:32 GMT

I know you want to see a solution in the daemon but I don't think it's there.
Try defining it CLIENT SIDE! (in windows) MS reinvents everything..
LPR -C xxx ........ (from NT admin guide)
usually sets the class name which is in turn printed on the burst page.
I'm grasping here but try researching this option (in windoze), maybe not
specifying anything in the 'xxx' field turns it off.

Actually I think your dilema is more with TCPIP than Linux. And we 
all know how MS pretties up commands when they feel like it.

Hope I've added something positive .. if not ... sorry.
-Walt


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (deeptendu majumder)
Subject: Trying to use Linux DHCP client with Sygate
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 21:36:24 GMT

I am trying to use Suse Linux DHCP client  with Sygate.

I have Sygate 3.0 running on my NT box connected to
the internet through a cable modem. The the IP address
for the local network card this box is 192.168.0.1 as
usual. I also have a HP Ombinook 4100 that dual boots 
to Win NT and Suse Linux 6.1.  It uses a Xircom Realport
10/100-56K PCMCIA card. In NT the card is setup to
use DHCP. When i hook the laptop into my local hub
connected to the second NIC on the Sygate machine, it
uses Sygate's DHCP service and it all works fine. 

In Linux mode I am using /etc/pcmcia/network.opts file
to configure the network options on the laptop. Only
thing I set in that file is the DHCP="y" option and 
everything else I left empty as "". After that when
I try to ping the sygate machine with "ping 192.168.0.1" 
the request simply times out. But when I brought in
the laptop at work and plugged it into the office network
while keeping the /etc/pcmcia/network.opts config exactly 
the same, it seems to work just fine. It gets DNS, IP 
address, etc assigned by the NT DHCP server used here 
at work without any problem. Can somebody tell me what 
could be wrong in my Sygate setup at home? Could it be 
an issue of the domain name assigned to the Linux machine 
during installtion ? 

I did try starting dhclient (dhcp client) by hand and I
got a bunch of messages about inadequate or improper
DHCPOFFER being recieved.


I also tried using fixed IP address = 192.168.0.2, netmask,
= 255.255.255.0, etc. in the network.opts file at home. 
Then I am able to ping the Sygate machine and able to reach 
outside world using IP addresses of machines. But I am still
not being able to use the Sygate service for DNS for 
some reason. Do I have to point to my cable modem provider's
DNS host ? Can't I point to the Sygate machine ? May be
I need to set something properly. I would also appreciate 
an answer for this.

But I would really like to use the DHCP feature if I can.
That way I can use the machine both at home and work
without too much hassle.

many thanks for any suggestion

d


------------------------------

Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Why not C++
From: Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 29 Jun 1999 17:36:19 -0400

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> In article <7l8oqv$s61$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [&<]
> >
> > Are you _really_ concluding this from the examples above?
> > The C++ vector will go away.  It will no in the C case
> > (it sounds like you may be saying the opposite above, it's not clear).
> >
> > >after using lisp's macros i don't know whether to laugh or cry when i
> > >think of C++ templates.
> >
> > Ok, tell us why.
> >
> > BTW, you guys are side-stepping the issue of C and C++ by bring in new
> > aspects (C++ vs Lisp for instance) and then slashing only C++ (and not
> C)
> > for it (assuming those aspects were even true of C and C++).  This is
> > misleading and biased.  Oddly though, it does show that folks don't
> want
> > the comparison between C and Language-X.
> >
> > - Greg
> > --
> 
> Yeah, I like that -- don't use C++ because templates aren't as 'good' as
> Lisp style macros so use C instead.

the point being
1) if you don't need templates, go ahead and use C.
2) if you *do* need templates, get a better language than C++.

actually i don't mind the templates in C++.  they are rather weak, but
not hard to use and are not terribly confusing

what i do mind is the object orientation parts -- especially the
inheritance and virtual function stuff.  i find the way C++ to be
overly complex and wordy.  when i need a higher level language, i
reach for a higher level language which for me is less painful and
that'd be lisp.

-- 
J o h a n  K u l l s t a m
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Don't Fear the Penguin!

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ISP Newcomer Needs Help
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 21:34:05 GMT

Is there a linux software package for a "ppp-server"? I'm not sure if
this is the right term, but as an experiment, If I were to get a cable
modem for access to the internet, and set aside 1 or 2 normal modems to
allow someone to dialup to my little home network, and recieve an local
IP and be able to get to the internet like my boxes on my network? It
would be neat to be able to replicate what my ISP does when I dial-in to
their network.


> Unless you're capable of basically building everything from scratch
(and
> borrowing the rest) you're looking at sinking or financing
> $50,000-$100,000 US.   You'll likely get a negative return on your
> investment for 3-5 years (more if you include what you could have been
> earning at a real job) and perhaps break even after that.  This is a
> competitive business with few barriers to entry, at least in the USA.
>
> If you find THAT nonuseful, try this Web site:
>
> http://www.amazing.com/isp
>
> which has the new Internet provider faq.
> --
> Jonathan Guthrie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Brokersys  +281-895-8101   http://www.brokersys.com/
> 12703 Veterans Memorial #106, Houston, TX  77014, USA
>


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

------------------------------

From: John Gardner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: redhat.networking.general
Subject: Re: tcp_timestamps=1 gives lousy networking on 2.2.x !!!
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:33:29 +0100

In article <7l9sn0$q40$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
>Hi,
>The TCP timestamping cause my network to be extremely 
>slow. 
>
>When turned off everythings works fine!!
>
>I used this ugly fix:
>echo \000 -n > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_timestamps
>
>I guess it should be in '/etc/rc.d/rc.local' or something
>similar to be active at boot time.
>
>I don't know the exact reason but it seems like packages
>are fragmented and I also belive there are probelms
>with sequence numbering. I haven't analysed the problem
>in detail because I am no Linux guru (in other words I
>don't know what to do).
>
>Is this a well known problem/bug?
>I am on kernel 2.2.5 (SuSE 6.1/RedHat 6.0).
>
>/Christer
>
>
>------------------  Posted via SearchLinux  ------------------
>                  http://www.searchlinux.com

In another thread, we have been discussing this. I experienced 
incorrect sequence numbering and the other poster had fragmentation
problems. Turning of TCP timestamps removes the problem.

It seems like a good interim fix to me.
---
John Gardner

------------------------------

From: Tomm Prickett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Connecting to ISP
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 16:09:54 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============897C7D194D2495105C209491
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Very new to Linux (Red Hat 5.0) (but old hand with UNIX). I got a modem
to dial-out to my ISP using minicom, but after entering userid and
password, nothing but heiroglyphics, then "NO CARRIER." Any suggestions
would be greatly appreciated.
([EMAIL PROTECTED])


==============897C7D194D2495105C209491
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
 name="prickett.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Tomm Prickett
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="prickett.vcf"

begin:vcard 
n:Prickett;Tomm
tel;pager:888-582-6708
tel;fax:630-260-4199
tel;work:630-260-7167
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
end:vcard

==============897C7D194D2495105C209491==


------------------------------

From: Peter Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DNS cache and database
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:10:19 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Anyone out there a DNS expert or no of a couple of good places to
track down what I am looking for? Specifically, I want to see an example
or three of both the DNS database and the DNS cache. Someplace with
examples would be nice. Or if you can draw one up and send it to this
newsgroup, that would be great too. And, I have been surfing, looking
mostly into www.dns.net links and under the isc website. Some good
stuff, but I would like a little more. Thanks to anyone that can or will
help me.
-- 
Peter Buelow

------------------------------

From: "Armscor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: timezone problems
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:58:18 +0200

Yeah, bugger the microsoft mail clients and revert back to your original
config!!

Joshua D Rusch wrote in message <7l84qs$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I'm having trouble with my time zone settings.... I originally was set to
>EST, but microsoft mail clients were picking that up and setting the time
on
>the messages an hour later (to EDT). So I then set my time zone to
>US/Eastern, and now all my cron jobs are running an hour later than they
>should.  Any suggestions?
>
>



------------------------------

From: Walt Shekrota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Banner after print job.
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:30:53 GMT

lpd reads printcap from /etc
do a man on printcap and locate hl which addresses burst.
-Walt


------------------------------

From: "YouDontKnowWho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Telnet Linux->Windows question
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:00:52 GMT

Look into local echo and terminal type.

--
And now we return to our regularly scheduled,
uncommonly entertaining thread...

Jeremy Page wrote in message ...
>When telneting from Red Hat 5.2 Linux into a Windows machine the
>keystrokes are misinterpreted and show up as garbage on the remote
>machine.
>
>e.g typing "dir" gives "ddiirr^M" and other crap.
>
>But I didnt ask for local echo, and the remote Windows machine reads
my
>input as ddiirr^M anyway (so giving bad command error). Telneting
using
>another Windows PC shows no problem.
>
>Any pointers to sloving this?
>
>--
>Jeremy Page
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron Leonard)
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: IP address binding to interface device ..
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:34:14 GMT

~ <SS> IMHO we need to identify the machine to the network , not the different
~ interfaces that the machine has. For example if the system had 2 ethernets ,
~ I could designate that the machine's address is x.y.z.a  rather than to the
~ different interfaces ( a.b.c.d to eth0 and u.v.w.x to eth1 ). From my
~ understanding of DECnet ( of course it uses its own routing protocol ), it
~ supports a mechanism that the address is the machine's not the interfaces.
~ This way if a single machine has multiple interfaces , it is able to provide
~ multiple paths and also can perform load balancing.

You are right.  DECnet does it right and IP does it wrong.  Having the
addressable communications endpoints be links rather than nodes has 
wrought much pain over the years.  (Consider the hoops that a UDP
server has to go thru on a "multihomed" [what a lame term!]
if it wants to have its responses go out with the "right" source IP
address.)  

This is the price you pay for a protocol stack that was designed by 
link-centric rather than host-centric folks.  (On the other hand, 
the benefit of a stack so designed is that IP has managed to 
[more or less smoothly] scale to encompass the globe.)

~ <SS> Yes , more than one interface card per machine. Sorry I have not been
~ clear enough. But, what I mean is for eg, 2 ethernet devices ( eth0, eth1
~ active ) in one system ( physically these could be on one card or on multiple
~ cards ). I will check out MC-Gaurd, but the systems that I have seen provide
~ an IP failover capability, for eg., if by some detection mechanism you find
~ that eth0 failed , you now disable eth0 through some scripts and activate
~ eth1 with the same ip address that eth0 had. But this mechanism does not
~ provide for load balancing.

Some systems will support a virtual IP address.  For example, Cisco
IOS allows you to create one or more "loopback" interfaces which
denote the box itself and not any particular physical interface.
We can then configure our IOS applications to use the loopback interface
address rather than one of the physical interface addresses - thus
the communications can load-balance across physical links, can
ride out link failures, etc.

I would think that a production-quality server operating system would
want to build in such a "loopback" interface.  If you are using an 
operating system that lacks such functionality, then you can work
around the problem by frontending your server(s) with boxes such as
our Local/Distributed Director systems (not a cheap solution however.)

Regards,

Aaron

------------------------------

From: "Martin Graiter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: Jammin' Adult Stuff 79156
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 04:38:29 +0200


<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i
diskussionsgruppsmeddelandet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> FREE ADULT XXX!!!
>
> Let's go:
>
> http://freedailyvirgins.the14u.com
> &nrd6hC@zf


What about mailbombing? Anyone good at that?




MG



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Add user problem
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 20:55:23 GMT

Just a guess, but check if you're editing /etc/passwd in another virtual
terminal or something like that. fuser /etc/passwd might tell you
something too. Does rebooting the system fix it?

In article <7lamtj$i2p$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been trying to add a new user to my Linux system, but when I
> attempt to set the password, it gives me a message "can't lock
password
> file, try again later". I can not log in under this username, and I am
> assuming that has something to do with this error. I am fairly new to
> administration on Linux systems, so any help would be most
appreciated.
>
> Neil
>
> --
>
> Network Administrator/
> Jedi Knight Extraordinaire
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to