Linux-Networking Digest #743, Volume #11 Thu, 1 Jul 99 09:13:50 EDT
Contents:
Re: Why not C++ (Johan Kullstam)
firewall+proxy+virusscanner (Markus Pietraszak)
Re: Diald dialing on single machine (Mike Jagdis)
Re: SMP - winNT&Linux (Mike Jagdis)
Re: !connecting to Netware LAN using Linux (Jim Henderson)
Re: masquerading (Jan Oosting)
Re: vt100 documentation and parsing (Mike Jagdis)
Re: Can't Telnet ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux to Linux SLOW! (Joachim Grimm)
Limiting the mail file size ("Carlos RCU")
port forwarding for kernel 2.2.9 ("Ying Q. Li")
Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (was: (De Messemaeker
Johan)
Re: Why not C++ (Klaus-Georg Adams)
Re: 192.168/16 vs. 10/8 (James Knott)
RH 6.0 SPARC PPP problem (Jonathan Swaby)
Re: IP Firewall Packet logging. Info required. (Malware)
Re: Why not C++ (Klaus-Georg Adams)
Re: vt100 documentation and parsing (francois fritz)
Re: vt100 documentation and parsing ("T.E.Dickey")
Re: masquerading ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux, Cable "RoadRunner" Modem and connections.. (Weeble Monger)
Re: IPMASQ behind my dumb universities firewall ("GC")
Re: May the Source Be With You (DanH)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Why not C++
From: Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 01 Jul 1999 07:05:03 -0400
"Thomas Steffen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > some would say static typing is a burden.
>
> they have to be ignorants. types are one of the most important
> software engineering aspects (and this is not my private opinion).
it's not your unique opinion. many others hold it too. however, many
others do not hold it. they are neither ignorant nor crazy.
*types* are important. being able to declare types for efficiency is
good. however *requiring* types everywhere is a nuisance. sometimes
we put up with it, but there's no reason you *have* to.
> would you drive a car where you don't know whether the brakes work, or
> exist at all? no. but you would run a program where you don't know
> that the types are compatible, yes?
the developers of C++ think so too. templates are a way to avoid
explicit typing.
> static (or compile time) typing has two key advantaged:
>
> a) type checking at compile time (and checking should be done as early
> as possible. of course design time would be better...)
this is a dubious advantage and far from universally accepted. static
typing is an expedient to the compiler writer. type agreement is no
guarentee of correctness.
> b) speed. knowing the type means optimisation is possible, maybe even
> the dispatch is possible to infer.
sure. languages such as lisp allow declaration of type in order to
trade safety for effeciency.
> if you don't like this, you can use interfaces and RTTI, which gives
> you all the flexibility there is, while still doing some type checks
> at compile time.
i can use a different language. my point is that C++ while powerful
is sufficiently painful to use that i'd prefer another language.
--
J o h a n K u l l s t a m
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Don't Fear the Penguin!
------------------------------
From: Markus Pietraszak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: firewall+proxy+virusscanner
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 13:03:46 +0200
Hi,
does anyone know how to setup a firewall with a proxy which can scan
(compressed) files that are downloaded through ftp or http for (windows)
viruses ?
I know of amavis which can scan outgoing email for viruses and I have
read
that there is a way to make a proxy do this through a firewall. If I
have
understood it right, a transparent proxy has to be set up. It gets the
data
and then scans it and it send every 30 seconds a byte to the client. And
if
the download is clean of viruses it sends the whole file to the client.
Is there a HOWTO for this issue or does anyone know a homepage or a
programm
for this?
Thank you in forward :-) !
marek pietraszak
ps.:Please sorry my bad english.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Jagdis)
Subject: Re: Diald dialing on single machine
Date: 1 Jul 1999 10:29:10 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <7ldgt6$j04$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> have setup a 2-machine network at home. I have also setup diald.
>Because I was having problems, I only booted the linux machine to test
>diald. It booted, diald started, and all looked Ok.
>
>Then I open Netscape, and type a url - it dials (great!). Then I am
>done and I want to disconnect, so I kill pppd and close Netscape.
>However it dials in 5 sec again. WHY!? no netscape, no other process.
Diald isn't psychic! It doesn't detect processes that may not even
be running on the local machine, it watches packets that traverse
the link and, using the configuration you gave it, decides how
long to keep the link up for expected following packets. If you
want diald to take the link down at a specific point you should
tell it so using the control facilities built in to it. If you
just rip the link from under it it will make its own decision
as to whether to restablish or not based on what traffic it has
seen recently.
Mike
--
A train stops at a train station, a bus stops at a bus station.
On my desk I have a work station...
.----------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Mike Jagdis | Internet: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Roan Technology Ltd. | |
| 2 Markham Mews, Broad Street | Telephone: +44 118 989 0403 |
| Wokingham ENGLAND | Fax: +44 118 989 1195 |
`----------------------------------------------------------------------'
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Jagdis)
Subject: Re: SMP - winNT&Linux
Date: 1 Jul 1999 11:08:53 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <7leh6c$a72$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, C. Hattendorf wrote:
>I have seen recent test results (apparently
>not MS influenced - to a great degree) that
>have NT's symmetric multi processing at
>an advantage 2 or 3 to 1 over Linux.
This sounds like the "web server" test. I put it in quotes
because not many people actually want to serve a single 4k
file to several thousand clients a second from a single
machine with multiple 100BaseTX interfaces. NT had the advantage
because it was able to scale network throughput as the number
of processors increased. What's impressive is that within
hours of a third party demonstrating the problem it was
fixed in the Linux test releases.
Should you have a need for an SMP machine to saturate
multiple fast interfaces *now* you either need a recent
Linux beta (all betas are open :-)) or you need to buy NT.
Incidentally the German magazine C'T did their own, slightly
more realistic tests, that show Linux as being ahead. Mind you,
web benchmarks these days tend to be about saturating vast
and unlikely amounts of bandwidth whereas anyone with that sort
of bandwidth cares more about latency and speed of client
rendering :-).
In short, get Linux, get NT, play with them under *your* real
world conditions. Email all problems to the relevant people.
See what happens :-).
Mike
--
A train stops at a train station, a bus stops at a bus station.
On my desk I have a work station...
.----------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Mike Jagdis | Internet: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Roan Technology Ltd. | |
| 2 Markham Mews, Broad Street | Telephone: +44 118 989 0403 |
| Wokingham ENGLAND | Fax: +44 118 989 1195 |
`----------------------------------------------------------------------'
------------------------------
From: Jim Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.netware.misc
Subject: Re: !connecting to Netware LAN using Linux
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:41:43 -0600
I haven't used IP for connectivity to my NetWare servers, but I have
used IPX. Which version of RedHat are you using?
I've set up 5.2 and 6.0 successfully - there are changes to the
documentation that need to be made and a couple of script changes as
well in order to get things to start up properly. I've been talking to
the folks at RedHat about the configuration files/script changes that
need to be made to get it working fine.
>From an IP perspective (my NetWare 4.11 server runs BorderManager and
connects to the internet using a dynamically allocated address from my
ISP - I use NAT/Border to do address translation and use a private IP
address block served by the Novell DHCP server) everything works using
the NW server as a router, but services to the file system are provided
over IPX.
I'm working on some documentation to put on the web as time permits -
lately it hasn't permitted, but I'll see if I can move it up my list of
things to do. :-)
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Novell Support Connection SysOp - http://support.novell.com/forums
Homepage at http://www.bigfoot.com/~jhenderson (email instructions
located here)
Please note that as an NSC SysOp, I do not provide support for Novell
products on a personal basis - if you need help with a Novell product,
please post a reply in the public newsgroup or visit the Novell support
forums at the URL above.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jan Oosting)
Subject: Re: masquerading
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 11:09:42 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Herbert Sauerer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>hi,
>
>whe i start masqerading with my SuSE linux 6.1, i get the following
>messages:
>
>bash-2.02# /sbin/init.d/masquerade start
>Enabling masquerading v2.1 on device ippp0... insmod: ip_masq_cuseeme: no
>module by that name found
>insmod: ip_masq_ftp: no module by that name found
>insmod: ip_masq_irc: no module by that name found
>insmod: ip_masq_quake: no module by that name found
>insmod: ip_masq_raudio: no module by that name found
>insmod: ip_masq_vdolive: no module by that name found
>
>the modules reside in
This is a known bug of SUS6.1, they forgot to put those masquerading
modules on cd, get them from www.suse.com from the updates and patches
You could also do a recompile of the kernel (don't forget 'make
modules modules_install'
Greetz,
Jan
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Jagdis)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: vt100 documentation and parsing
Date: 1 Jul 1999 11:11:11 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <7lf88n$10a$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jean-Christophe Dhellemmes wrote:
>I am trying to write a program that needs to parse vt100/ansi terminal
>escape sequences. Any pointer to the full vt100/ANSI escape sequences
>technical documention and/or any parsing source code would be greatly
>appreciated.
Try .../linux/drivers/char/console.c or the source for xterm :-).
Mike
--
A train stops at a train station, a bus stops at a bus station.
On my desk I have a work station...
.----------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Mike Jagdis | Internet: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Roan Technology Ltd. | |
| 2 Markham Mews, Broad Street | Telephone: +44 118 989 0403 |
| Wokingham ENGLAND | Fax: +44 118 989 1195 |
`----------------------------------------------------------------------'
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Can't Telnet
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 11:08:10 GMT
In article <7lcb6k$5fg$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Same thing happens from the windows to the linux.
> Ay
> > >suggestions??
>
> first thing to check, afaik, is if telnet is enabled on the linux-box
(
> hosts.allow)
> you can check by doing a telnet(linuxbox) on a console(xterm) of the
> linuxbox.
> if you get something like'connection refused by peer' read man
> hosts.allow
> >
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>
--
I was getting problems telnetting onto my Linux box - I could get on
but it took 2-3 minutes before telnet would give me the login prompt.
Also my ftp client would give up before I got connected.
After reading several of the threads here, I added entries into
/etc/hosts for my clients and also added ALL: ALL into /etc/hosts.allow
and made sure that /etc/hosts.deny was clear.
Now it seems OK but I have not extensively tested it yet.
-> Lance
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Joachim Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux to Linux SLOW!
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 13:23:39 +0200
Hello Barnaby,
I have an idea, I hope it is good.
You may have a circle in your network. If both Linux-boxes are working
as router, packages might take two ways or routed several times. Then
the amount of data collission arises and real network traffic is
breaking down. Just test this hypothese in cutting of the circle.
Ciao
Joachim Grimm
------------------------------
From: "Carlos RCU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Limiting the mail file size
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 13:27:01 +0200
Hi!!:
Some users on my server doesn't remove their messages when they read
their mail. There is one who has reached 23mb on his mail file at
/var/spool/mail. I can't make them to erase their mail but I don't want my
server become full of old mail messsages either.
Is there anyway of limiting the size of those files?.
Thanks in advance
Carlos
------------------------------
From: "Ying Q. Li" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: port forwarding for kernel 2.2.9
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 07:28:36 -0400
hello all, i am trying to make my internal WWW server available to the
internet, it is behind my Linux firewall secured using "ipchains". can
anyone provide information regards where i can get "ipportfw", "ipmasqadm"
patches that works for kernel 2.2.9, or any suggestion at all, greatly
appreciated.
liy
------------------------------
From: De Messemaeker Johan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
omp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (was:
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 13:46:20 +0200
Chad Mulligan wrote:
> >And how do you know this actually happened? Were you present? You read
> >it in a book written by an American hater? On behalf of the Americans
> >who died saving your sorry ass in WWII, I *demand* a retraction and
> >appology for such a vicious attack!
>
> I would have to agree with Mr taylor on this one. The stories I've heard, some first
> hand from German POW's in the US, friends of my Granddad who was a Latvian pressed
> into German service, all said they were treated well and some even remained friends
> with their jailers.
True, that happened. But it wasn't always like that. Here in Belgium, there was a
concentrationcamp named 'Breendonk'. When the americans arrived, they torchered the
germans. That's a historical fact. And there's a lot more. But what do we expect ? It
was
war, with all pleasant and unpleasant stuff ... sort of ...
------------------------------
From: Klaus-Georg Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Why not C++
Date: 01 Jul 1999 14:00:45 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John E. Davis) writes:
> On 26 Jun 1999 11:10:23 -0700, Nathan Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >Classes are not a very powerful feature; you can emulate them pretty
> >well in C. Exceptions are quite powerful, though of limited use.
>
> You can emulate classes and inheritance but doing so requires ugly
> preprocessor hacks that make the code less understandable. If you
> know of another way, then please let me know.
Of course. Take a look at Xt, the X Window Toolkit Intrinsics. This is
pure OO, with class objects, virtual functions, encapsulation, written
in C. No preprocessor hacks at all.
You have member functions (the internal Widget functions). You even
have access to the baseclasses member functions. You have static
member functions (internal functions of the widgetclass object). You
have data members and you have static data members.
Ugly? You bet. The code is full of casts, because C needs them.
Does it need coding discipline? Sure. The compiler doesn't get a
chance to bitch because of all the casts.
Would it be easier in C++? I think so.
kga
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Knott)
Subject: Re: 192.168/16 vs. 10/8
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:53:42 -0400
Reply-To: James Knott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In article <7l3gi8$7r0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Some older ethernet cards cared what network class you were using, but
>those haven't been on the market for many years.
Since when was any NIC sensitive to network class or even TCP/IP???
Last time I checked, a NIC simply sent a packet from one MAC address
to another, with no consideration for higher level protocols etc.
Everything else is done in software at a higher level.
--
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________________
The above opinions are my own and not those of ISM Corp., a subsidiary of
IBM Canada Ltd.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jonathan Swaby)
Subject: RH 6.0 SPARC PPP problem
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 12:22:21 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have RedHat 6.0 SPARC installed on a SPARCStation 2. I am using a
Zoom 33.6K modem attached to /dev/ttyS0. For some reason, I am unable
to get the modem to dial at all. I can get the modem to dial using
mincom. I have tried using that same startup string with chat, but to
no avail. I am also able to get the modem to dial using DIP. In the
log I see some message about loopback. I have read through the various
doc, and can't figure out what is causing the problem. Does anyone
have any ideas.
Thanks
Jonathan Swaby
Computer Services Specialist IV
Student Affairs
Georgia Institute
Of Technology
------------------------------
From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP Firewall Packet logging. Info required.
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 07:16:27 +0200
Hallo Sijaiko,
you wrote:
> The result was, that I saw flaws in the traffic counting.
> A 1.9Mb FTP link was counted to be just 35Kb.
You probably counted the traffic of the control connection only. FTP
does use a seperated connection to transfer the actual data.
Malware
------------------------------
From: Klaus-Georg Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Why not C++
Date: 01 Jul 1999 13:49:22 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John E. Davis) writes:
> On Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:53:08 +1200, Bruce Hoult <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > some_function(&foo);
> >
> >What will be foo's value after the call to some_function? Will it be
> >altered? In C he has no way of knowing because C programmers often pass
> >structs by reference even when they don't intend to change them.
>
> At least the syntax indicates whether or not foo could be altered.
> The fact remains that one cannot look at
>
> some_function (x)
>
> in C++ and be sure that x was not modified, whereas in C you know that
> the local variable x will not be affected. And yes, like many people,
> I use an editor that supports tags. When reading C++ code, I do have
> to look up every such function to see whether or not something like x
> could be modified by the function. With C, knowing instantly that x
> could not be modified is a big help to understanding code fragments.
#define some_function(x) ++x
:-)
You have to look at the definition anyways, in C or C++.
kga
------------------------------
From: francois fritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: vt100 documentation and parsing
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 14:14:01 +0200
Mike Jagdis wrote:
> Try .../linux/drivers/char/console.c or the source for xterm :-).
You can also have a look to the sequences descriptions in either
/etc/termcap or
/usr/lib/terminfo/* (dont remember the name of the source file for
terminfo).
--
Francois FRITZ | SG EQTY/FFD/INF
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 17, Cours Valmy (Tour SG)
Tel : (33) 01 42 13 49 13 | 92987 Paris La Defense Cdx
Fax : (33) 01 42 13 40 62 | France / Frankreich
------------------------------
From: "T.E.Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: vt100 documentation and parsing
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 12:32:38 GMT
In comp.os.linux.development.system Mike Jagdis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <7lf88n$10a$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jean-Christophe Dhellemmes wrote:
>>I am trying to write a program that needs to parse vt100/ansi terminal
>>escape sequences. Any pointer to the full vt100/ANSI escape sequences
>>technical documention and/or any parsing source code would be greatly
>>appreciated.
> Try .../linux/drivers/char/console.c or the source for xterm :-).
console.c isn't a good place (it's missing some pieces of vt100, and adds
a mix of ansi and non-ansi controls). But it is fairly simple and easy
to read.
xterm's ctlseqs.ms file (nroff -ms) has a complete list of what's implemented
in xterm (vt100 + vt220, which is a superset).
I would look first at Shuford's archive - then at xterm:
http://www.cs.utk.edu/~shuford/terminal_index.html
ftp://ftp.clark.net/pub/dickey/xterm
--
Thomas E. Dickey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: masquerading
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 11:56:27 GMT
I have the same problem with Mandrake 6.0. But everything works find so
I haven't done anything about it.
I looking forward to seeing the answers you get.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Weeble Monger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux, Cable "RoadRunner" Modem and connections..
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 08:37:35 -0400
Actually, MediaOne will not support anything other than Win95/98 and
Win NT *WORKSTATION* (So lie if you have Server)... If you go to
linux.org and search for "cable modem" it'll put you into the
mini-howto's... that runs you thru how to set it up. There's also a
DHCP (which they use) howto in there. Hope that helps...
doc wrote:
> I *believe* I saw a reference to a setup for MediaOne's
> Road Runner cable modem setup? But I either did not bookmark
> it or I just dont' see it now...
>
> DOES anyone know of the site I'm trying to recall???
> Thanks very much.
> --
> Rich "Doc" Colley - MIS Dept.
> Huntington Library, Art Collection and Botanical Gardens
------------------------------
From: "GC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPMASQ behind my dumb universities firewall
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 12:39:34 GMT
Routing tables...
Windows for some reason sometimes does not configure the routing tables
correctly. Also the DNS addresses in windows may be wrong.
-GC
Jason X Pacheco wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>well the reason the universitie's firewall doesn't allow you to ping, is it
>probably drops all ping packets, to prevent some punk from ping flooding
>the network. ... ur win98 box should be able to access web pages and do
>everything ur linux box does if ip masq is set up right...hmm...it's pretty
>odd.right now i can't think of a reason why...are u using IPchains or
>ipfwadm? .... what happens when you try to laod a web page on the 98 box?
>does it time out, give you any sorta error?
>
>
>David Summers wrote:
>
>> Here's my situation: I live on campus and have a direct connection to
>> the Universities network via ethernet (well, there's an ISDN between us,
>> but I am not on an ISDN modem). The university has a firewall, and I
>> don't know much anything about firewalls but basically I can do passive
>> FTP transfers, I can surf the web just fine (at about 60k..remember the
>> ISDN) and I can also use ICQ, heat.net, and certain TCP/IP network games
>> such as Quake. I cannot ping outside sites (it always times out) or play
>> games using MS DirectPlay. I don't understand why I can view internet
>> sites, download, etc. but can't ping. Frankly I hadn't really cared
>> untill now.
>>
>> Anyway, I setup a small tcp network using Linux (mandrake 5.3) as a
>> server connected to the internet through eth0 and to a Win98 box through
>> eth1. I can do all the internet stuff described above on the Linux box,
>> and I can ping to my hearts content between Linux and Win98 (I used
>> class C private network IP addresses). I can also telnet from Win98 into
>> linux. I cannot ping outside addresses from either box, nor can I access
>> any internet pages from the Win98 box. I am fairly certain I set up
>> IPMASQ correctly because I can ping (from Win98) IP addresses on the
>> Universities network that are on my side of the (Universities) firewall.
>> Is my assumption correct that IPmasq is probably running correctly since
>> this is possible?
>>
>> So do any of you have any tips on giving my Win98 machine the same
>> internet priveledges my Linux box gets? Remember, the Linux box
>> (actually any machine hooked directly to the universities network) can
>> view web pages, use ICQ, download, etc. but cannot ping anything (even
>> pages that are open in Netscape at the same time..how strange to me). I
>> have read both the NET-3 HOWTO and the IPMASQ mini HOWTO.
>>
>> Thanks so much for yourtime.
>>
>> David
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
------------------------------
From: DanH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: May the Source Be With You
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 09:00:39 -0400
Jey Kottalam wrote:
>
> May The Source Be With You!
>
> Cool JPG of TUX holding a light sabre. attched.
>
> -Jey Kottalam
> 13 Year Old Linux Enthusiast/ Computer Programmer
> got linux?
>
> [Image]
Yes, the .jpg is neat, however there are newsgroups to post binaries to
and these are not them.
Dan
--
UNIX - Not just for vestal virgins anymore
Linux - Choice of a GNU generation
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
