Linux-Networking Digest #757, Volume #11 Fri, 2 Jul 99 08:13:45 EDT
Contents:
Re: How can I use Win98 to access Linux Server? (Andrew Williams)
Re: samba and win98 reg hack (Andrew Williams)
Re: Help setting up email server on Linux w/DSL connection... (Christopher Mahmood)
***Why can't dial out on my PPP server? (guanghe)
Re: Too many files open SAMBA error (Tony Keating)
Re: Linux Web and DNS server possible with one IP? (Christopher Mahmood)
Permission and shared library problem after installing net-tools (Cedric Chausson)
Re: PPP and win95 dailin ("Chris Hailes")
Apache Restart ("Tim Woodcock")
Re: Linux/W98 SMTP Woes Continue... ("Setzer")
Re: net logon and net use ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Can I use Linux as a server to a Windows based calendar/scheduling application?
(Duncan Simpson)
Adding function to IP stack ("Daniel")
Linux Telnet Problem ("Drake Lin")
Telnet problem (RH6.0) ("Drake Lin")
Re: mail & databases (Gergo Barany)
Re: Linux Web and DNS server possible with one IP? (Duncan Simpson)
Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark?
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
PCMCIA Ethernet networking problem (Mike Carden)
Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark?
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Help! printing via samba on RH 6.0 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Andrew Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How can I use Win98 to access Linux Server?
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 12:11:28 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samba dislikes ipx/spx, hates NetBEUI and needs TCP/IP. All Samba then needs
is Microsaft file+print sharing enabled.
The rest is done in Samba, my web-page goes into that in some detail.
Jason Pun wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am a newbie of Linux. I want to setup a Linux Server for accessing by
> Win98 / WinNT. I just know set samba to let Win98 access to Linux Server.
> But how to configure Win98 indeed? Anyone can tell me the whole process of
> setting up a new Linux network for connecting Linux with Win98?
>
> Thanks if anyone can help me!
>
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect, especially on my
http://www.germanynet.de/teilnehmer/101/69082/samba.html
Simple Samba Solutions web page. ICQ 1722461
__________________________________________________________
| Fight Spam! Join EuroCAUCE: http://www.euro.cauce.org/ |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
------------------------------
From: Andrew Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: samba and win98 reg hack
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 12:13:13 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Section 4.4 on my web-page lists all cases I know about.
Bill Pitz wrote:
> Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> gave us the interesting posting of:
> > i have it all set up...only prob is that i ALWAYS get "bad password" when i
> > login via my win98 box..where can i get hte registry patch for that so that
> > it allows plain text? or what do i need? plz help...thanks
> > -dave
>
> Well, I have only been messing with Samba for a short time, but in some
> cases, it does not like mixed-case passwords... A very annoying little
> glitch that I'm still trying to figure out. I did pick up a pretty decent
> book - "Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" published by Sams publishing.
>
> -Bill
> --
> Bill Pitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Silicon Valley North, Inc. www.svn.net
> Internet and World Wide Web Services (707) 781-9999
--
Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect, especially on my
http://www.germanynet.de/teilnehmer/101/69082/samba.html
Simple Samba Solutions web page. ICQ 1722461
__________________________________________________________
| Fight Spam! Join EuroCAUCE: http://www.euro.cauce.org/ |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
------------------------------
From: Christopher Mahmood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help setting up email server on Linux w/DSL connection...
Date: 30 Jun 1999 16:25:40 -0700
just start your MTA at boot. Most distributions (all?) come with
sendmail by default...i'd use qmail instead.
-ckm
------------------------------
From: guanghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ***Why can't dial out on my PPP server?
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 18:45:43 -0400
I use Redhat 6.0 to setup a PPP server and want it can call back,
now the PPP server is fine to waiting for call in,but when I dial
out,it report:
'Can't open /dev/ttyS2,the resource is busy'.
I use getty_ps,and set /etc/inittab so:
s2:345:respawn:/sbin/uugetty -D /etc/conf.getty.ttyS2 F115200 vt100
Who can tell me why?and how to set redhat be a PPP server that can call
back.
Thank very much!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tony Keating)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,aus.computers.linux,comp.protocols.smb,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Too many files open SAMBA error
Date: 2 Jul 1999 10:52:16 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 02 Jul 1999 12:07:00 +0200, Andrew Williams wrote:
>
>> LinuxBox<->Win98 samba networked. All functions mapping, read, write
>> etc from WinBox are working. I am running RH 6.0-2.2.9 and samba
>> 2.0.4b (this error arose sometime after the kernel & samba upgrade.
>> Sadly I upgraded together.(o wellll live and tear hair)
>>
>> In linux I issue ]# smbmount //Win98/DriveA -c 'mount /samba'
>> no errors
>> I do a
>> ls /samba
>> and I get this ]# too any files open in system.
I had the same problem with kernel 2.2.9, upgraded to 2.2.10 and everything
worked fine.. ?
Tony.
--
Tony Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PhD student - DNS/LES of mass transfer/corrosion
System Administator - Physical Sciences and Engineering Computing Laboratory
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Queensland
------------------------------
From: Christopher Mahmood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux Web and DNS server possible with one IP?
Date: 30 Jun 1999 16:19:14 -0700
for the most part, yes. for example, in my house I have a main linux
box that connects to my ISP. On it I have a caching DNS, news leafsite,
and some basic firewall stuff. Behind it, I have a couple of machines
that masquerade through the main box via ethernet so I can (as I'm
doing now) lounge in a chair with my laptop and read news.
All of the info on how to do this is found in the HOWTO's -- just be
sure to get the latest versions (esp. for IP-Masquerading).
-ckm
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cedric Chausson)
Subject: Permission and shared library problem after installing net-tools
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 10:26:06 GMT
Hello,
I recently installed Net-tools 1.51. After doing that I tried to use
Netstat but I just got Netstat : error in loading Shared libraries :
undefined symbol __register_ frame _info
And after rebooting, I get the same message during the boot messages.
And after that the domain localhost name which usually apppears to the
left of the invite is replaced by (none).
I looked at Nettools using RPM packet manager and it found permissions
problems with several items.
Anybody could tell how to fix things ?
Cedric the Heretic
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not
got it."
-- George Bernard Shaw
------------------------------
From: "Chris Hailes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP and win95 dailin
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 20:59:43 +1000
Gidday,
Obtain and install mgetty and read the documentation and configure it.
Works great and there is a mgetty news group de.alt.comm.mgetty. The
program does Win95 PAP logins (Win95 default method) and scripted logins and
can receive FAXes directly.
Good luck
Chris
J. 'FIK' Brand wrote in message <7ld6ev$7uc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I want to use a Linux machine as a ppp-server, the clients are Win95
>
>How do i set up 'pap' so that it works with dialin-adapter from Win95
>
>Jurgen
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Tim Woodcock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Apache Restart
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 12:09:42 +0100
Can anyone tell me why I get this error when I type the command:
httpd stop
error message: sqlinit DBROOT must be set !!!
I just need to restart Apache web server.
I have tried using the suggested kill -TERM 'cat /var/run/httpd.pid' (the
location of my pid file) but linux complains that the pid does not exist.
Thanks in advance.
Tim.
------------------------------
From: "Setzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Linux/W98 SMTP Woes Continue...
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 07:16:08 -0400
Unixman wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>
>I connect to the POP3 server on the Linux box for mail. No problem. I
>can receive mail just fine (using a variety of clients including
>Netscape Communicator and Eudora). The problem is when I try to send
>mail out. It works sometimes - but more often than not, things just sort
>of "hang".
>
I am having the same sort of problem on an closed intranet system. My mail
downloads from the POP3 daemon just fine, but the outbound mail from my
WIN95 clients takes 1.5 to 2 minutes to clear out of the system and be
accepted by the SMTP daemon.
Ping times are quite acceptible: 0.6 to 1.0 ms, but I also find that the
time it takes to open a Telnet session is overly long, about a minute. Once
established it works OK.
I am pretty sure that Linux is innocent in this and am coming to believe
that WIN95 is the problem. I keep searching for a setting to tweek on the
WIN95 clients, but have had no luck so far.
I will be glad to share my adventures with you if I can be of help.
>Has ANYONE seen this? I'm about to throw this damn thing out the window
>and dive out after it! I'm serious!!! I'll do it!!!! Hehe.
>
I'm right behind you.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
General Failure Reading Drive C
(A)bort, (R)etry, (G)et a beer?
Dan Setzer Balt., MD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: net logon and net use
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 10:22:53 GMT
In article <7lhpdo$ped$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Dimitri Willemse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now, why would you wanna do that??
>
> In Win98 (i.e. in the GUI) you can map a network drive (right-click
network
> neighborhood, click map networkdrive) X to a path.
>
> In DOS mode, you are not logged on to a domain yet, so you won't be
able to
> access your network sources. I am not sure if there is a 'net' command
to
> log on to a domain.
I want to use scripts in order to be more flexible, i.e. to change
to directory assigned to the letter X without having to spent
a whole day to change all clients.
The net command is the more convenient way.
Oliver.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Duncan Simpson)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: Can I use Linux as a server to a Windows based calendar/scheduling
application?
Date: 2 Jul 1999 11:15:53 GMT
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Karl-Heinz Zimmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Am 02.07.1999, 02:59:35, schrieb Steve Hiner:
>[Win clients and Linux server]
>> I would like to give them the ability to have a group
>> calendar and group schedule. There is no way I could
>> convince them to switch the desktops over to Linux
>> (I don't think I would want to train 30 computer
>> illiterate people on Linux). What I am interested in
>> is some server type software that would interface with
>> some off-the-shelf Windows software (like Outlook or
>> an equivalent).
For mail sendmail and your choice of POP and IMAP servers will work
with outlook, netscape, IE, eudora, pegasus (and most of the
competition). The products I mentioned should cover 99% of all users
already. IF sendmail is not flexible enough that nothing that currently
exists is--I even modified ruleset 0 to "fix" a failure of NTmail to
comply with the internet host requirements w.r.t bounces.
For a calendar I hear netscape has one which works on a wide variety of
platforms, including Solaris. Chance of a linux version of at least the
server side are 99.9%---netscape decide linux was a force they would
support, for mercanary financial reasons, in the server market. Naturally
you can access it from a PC running M$ stuff. (I think it is commercial).
[Of course if you really need in netscape's calenda should run nicely
on an ultra-sparc based SUN enterprise 2000 SMP box... these cost $$$$$
and have lots of CPUs, memory, fast RAID 5 disc space, etc.]
--
Duncan (-:
"software industry, the: unique industry where selling substandard goods is
legal and you can charge extra for fixing the problems."
------------------------------
From: "Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Adding function to IP stack
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 12:22:51 +0100
I wish to add some new function and remove some of the unneeded stuff from
the lunix com stack. The problem is that I have no idea where to start. I
have entered many IRC chats on the subject and get told
"Go to the source dude!" <in a dumb surfer accent>
Well the source is a bit too OTT for me at the moment and I want to gently
accustome myself to it.
The question is.
Where can I get information about the structure of the linux comstack? Some
simple stuff at first. I will contact the writer of the stack as a last
move.
Dan
Answers here or to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks...
------------------------------
From: "Drake Lin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux Telnet Problem
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 18:43:35 -0000
My friend and I are setting up Linux with RH6.0. And we are trying to telnet
one of our server on the internet connection. But always get a IP from ISP
rather than our actual assigned IP. Is there a way to reveal my true IP ? Or
there is something to be done for both of us to telent the server ?
Thanks & Regards,
Drake
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Drake Lin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Telnet problem (RH6.0)
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 23:16:57 -0000
Hello,
I and a friend installed RH6.0 on both machines, and trying to telnet one of
machine by using internet connection/modem connection. It look like we
always cannot get a correct IP of each other. So I wonder if there is a
function need to be setup before we can use it ?
Thanks and regards,
Drake
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gergo Barany)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: mail & databases
Date: 2 Jul 1999 11:39:37 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, jmr wrote:
>------=_NextPart_000_000C_01BEC41F.C1CF6F60
>Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Please don't post HTML and other binary formats to non-binary groups.
Gergo
--
A new dramatist of the absurd
Has a voice that will shortly be heard.
I learn from my spies
He's about to devise
An unprintable three-letter word.
GU d- s:+ a--- C++>$ UL+++ P>++ L+++ E>++ W+ N++ o? K- w--- !O !M !V
PS+ PE+ Y+ PGP+ t* 5+ X- R>+ tv++ b+>+++ DI+ D+ G>++ e* h! !r !y+
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Duncan Simpson)
Subject: Re: Linux Web and DNS server possible with one IP?
Date: 2 Jul 1999 11:48:27 GMT
In <7ldrah$avs$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "George"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Hi everybody,
>I'm going to have the Basic Plan of Pacific Bell's ADSL service installed in
>a few weeks. I want to put up a Linux web server but that plan does not
>give me a domain (and it only gives me one IP). If I register a domain with
>Internic myself, and build my own Linux DNS server, will my web site be
>visible to the world? Are there other alternatives to this?
The cheapest option is probably just to quote your machine name. I
could, at least in theory, run a server on this box and tell you to
point your client at feynman.ecs.soton.ac.uk.
Otherwise, the answer is "yes, modulo a few things". First check you meet
the requirements for registering a name in whatever domain you choose. Common
requirments include
- Handing over cash to the appropiate people on a regular basis
- Being in the right country
- Having a fixed set of IP numbers
- Providing two name servers on physically different hardware
- Having a legal right to use the name (or at least not using a name
someone else has as a trademark---registering as mcdonalds.com would
be dubious, for example).
Various people will help with many of these requirements, inclduing putting
in the application on your behalf and forwarding your money. Getting them
to act as a secondary for your machine set up as a primary, or even providng
both themselves, is not impossible (but a charge might apply).
--
Duncan (-:
"software industry, the: unique industry where selling substandard goods is
legal and you can charge extra for fixing the problems."
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
omp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark?
Date: 2 Jul 1999 11:34:20 GMT
In comp.os.linux.misc Anthony D. Tribelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
= > The USA was *supposedly* an ally from BEFORE the war...
= > So, Mr Taylor... What year was the start of WWII again??? 1939? Or 1942?
= > WHERE WERE YOU LOT THEN?
= Keeping Britain armed and fed. There was also our 'secret' war against the
= German submarines that pre-dated Pearl Harbor.
Ahhh yes. I heard about that in a documentary about Alan Turing and the code
breakers at Bletchley Park...
apparently, they decoded a message saying that U-boats were on course for
the eastern seaboard and reported this info. This info then got passed on to
american "intelligence", where the admaral of the fleet, who hated the
British, just ignored it and allows 100 allied ships to be sunk...
Yup... That war against the u-boats was a GREAT success...
</sarcasm>
--
______________________________________________________________________________
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | *ZAPP* *SCREEeeeeee* *POW* *ZAPZAPZAPZAP* *BOOM* |
|Andrew Halliwell | "Don't run away.... We are your friends." |
|Principal subjects in:-| *ZAP* "AAAAAARGH" *BOOOM* |
|Comp Sci & Electronics | - The translator device... Mars Attacks |
==============================================================================
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ 5++ |
|X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! >*SULK*<|
==============================================================================
------------------------------
From: Mike Carden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.portable
Subject: PCMCIA Ethernet networking problem
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 12:55:48 +0100
I've a big problem which none of the documentation has helped with!
Configuration:-
Pentium II laptop with Xircom Realport 10/100+Modem 56
Redhat 6.0 new install.
Problem.
The hardware works fine with win95/98/nt including the xircom
I get a real weird problem with linux 6.0.
The linux machine puts packets onto the network with no problem.
I can see them with a sniffer.
They are mainly arp packets of course until I manually add an entry via
arp -s for another machine.
When I do this and then a ping, I see the icmp traffic in both
directions with the sniffer. The linux box sees no replys ( the led on
the xircom flickers though as one would expect ).
ifconfig -a reports no packets RX TX or collisions.
network addresses, netmasks etc are all correct and the other machine
populates it's MAC arp table with the linux boxes ether address
correctly.
Anybody got any ideas?
Thanks.
--
Mike Carden
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
omp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark?
Date: 2 Jul 1999 11:40:07 GMT
In comp.os.linux.misc "Bob Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
= In article <7lfucc$9j0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
= > In comp.os.linux.misc "Bob Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
= > = And how do you know this actually happened? Were you present? You read
= > = it in a book written by an American hater? On behalf of the Americans
= > = who died saving your sorry ass in WWII, I *demand* a retraction and
= > = appology for such a vicious attack!
= >
= > Who are you to *demand* anything?
= You falsely accused Americans of brutality.
Did I? Care to point out where?
Now who's making false accusations?
= > More to the point, I really wish the US lusers would stop it with the "We
= > pulled your ass(sp) out of the fire in WWII" bollocks.
= Look, you insufferable ass, the people of the US build the worlds
= largest and most successful economy.
Insufferable ass? What could possibly make you say that.
After WWII, yes. Before that, you were NOT a "superpower".
Your country was the only one in the northern hemishpere that was NOT
totally trashed in the war, therefore, you had no infrastructure to rebuild,
therefore, you had plenty of money to put elsewhere.
The only countries that really BENEFITTED from the war were Germany and the
USA (Because it bumped the usa several rungs up the ladder of world power,
and everyone else down a couple.)
Our farmers feed the US
= population and 25% of the rest of the world. The American people
= freely give of their time and money to those less fortunate.
And people from other countries DON'T?
= Now as to WWII, why don't you do some research and a little thinking?
= > The USA was *supposedly* an ally from BEFORE the war...
= > So, Mr Taylor... What year was the start of WWII again??? 1939? Or 1942?
= > WHERE WERE YOU LOT THEN?
= The overwhelming opinion of the Americans prior to Hitler was to stay
= out of European squabbles. There was also laws against involvement.
= Exactly *what* do you define WWII as? The war against Germany began
= when Britain and France declared war. As far as I am concerned, WWII
= began when the US declared war on Japan and Germany declared war on
= the US.
The rest of the world (tm) dates WWII as 1939 to 1945.
= > And don't come back with any balls about the US helping to rebuilt the
= > infrastructure in Britain with lots of money, because those were LOANS,
= > which we paid back and owe you NOTHING on that anymore.
= American money rebuilt Europe under the Marsall Plan. I Have *no* use
= whatsoever for revisionist historians. They are an insult to
= history. I also have little use and absolutly *no* respect for people
= who spread lies about my country and my people. Most especially
= vicious ones such as these.
What lies have I spread so far? care to point one out, cos I'm at a loss...
--
| |What to do if you find yourself stuck in a crack in |
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |the ground beneath a giant boulder, which you can't |
| |move, with no hope of rescue. |
|Andrew Halliwell |Consider how lucky you are that life has been good |
|Principal subjects in:-|to you so far... |
|Comp Sci & Electronics | -The BOOK, Hitch-hiker's guide to the galaxy. |
==============================================================================
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ 5++ |
|X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! >*SULK*<|
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help! printing via samba on RH 6.0
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 18:03:36 GMT
After installing a brand new RedHat 6.0 I discovered that I can not
longer print on on a printer using Samba server. My setup is:
two machines one running RH 6.0 (Kernel 2.2.5), Samba 2.0.3 and
yaving HP LJ 6L printer, and another running Windows 95 OSR2.
Both boxes have 3com 905b-TX NIC's directly connected by crosswired
cable.
In general Samba works well. I can mount Windows partition
in Linux, see Linux disks from Windows 95 and transfer files in both
directions via Samba. Windows successfully detects network
printer attached to the Linux box. But any time I prints from Windows
to this printer, just _nothing_happens_! I can see that printing job
is actually transfered via network (examining a number of RX/TX
packages). But nothing appears nethher on printer nor in the lp
queue. I'he examined various logs and do not see any error messages.
Notice that with RedHat 5.2 Kernel 2.0.36 and RedHat 5.2 upgraded to
the Kernel 2.2.3 everything was just fine.
Any suggestion is greatly appreciated,
Vadim
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
