Linux-Networking Digest #809, Volume #11 Wed, 7 Jul 99 08:13:43 EDT
Contents:
Re: Can't ping !!!! (Andreas Schlager)
Print accounting with Linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: automatic dialup to ISP (Flavio Curti)
multiple shaper (Cristian Bradiceanu)
Re: Linux can not see more than one NIC card in one PC??
Re: newbie needs help ("Maguai")
Re: Linux as the server software ("Maguai")
Re: Setting up printer under Samba ("Maguai")
Network Status App w/ LAN and Cable Modem (Nathan Banek)
Re: Let's do the SAMBA ("Maguai")
Re: samba: connection to machine failed ("Maguai")
Re: !!!!Logging on a DHCP netware LAN ("[EMAIL PROTECTED]")
Re: samba printing, need a little help.. ("Maguai")
Re: Peer-to-peer network: Linux + Win98 ("Maguai")
Re: Linux as the server software ("Maguai")
Re: Linux drive not shown in network neighbourhood ("Maguai")
Re: RH 6.0 & 3C905C TXM Problems (Eric DE VITO)
Re: extra email accounts on different systems (Psophos)
Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (John Imrie)
Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (John Imrie)
Re: Samba and windows have got me baffeled ???? (M. Buchenrieder)
HELP! NIS doesn't work (Fai)
crond ("Andr� Ricardo Sartori")
Re: Why not C++ (david parsons)
Re: Why not C++ (david parsons)
Problems with virtual Interfaces (Claus Bitten)
Mail Server ("Andr� Ricardo Sartori")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas Schlager)
Subject: Re: Can't ping !!!!
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 09:14:23 GMT
Hi,
be sure to use the same netmask (255.255.255.0) on both machines.
Check the cable. TP-cables uses pins 1,2,3 and 6.
HTH.
Andreas
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999 11:42:25 +0200, "Yossi Haddad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Please Help,
>
>I have two computer at home one with Linux RedHat 6.0 kernel 2.2.10 and one
>with Windows 98.
>Both computer with 3COM 3C509B NIC. They are connected with a cross wire (No
>Hub).
>Both configuerd with TCP/IP and static IP address ( Linux = 192.168.0.1 -
>Win98 = 192.168.0.2)
>Both card are recoginzed by the computer in the terms of IRQ and IO.
>
>
>The problem is that I can't ping each computer no matter what I tried, on
>the Win98 side I get 'reuest time out' and on the Linux side I get nothing.
>
>Please Help.
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Print accounting with Linux
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 11:17:38 +0200
Anybody knows a tool for print accountig with linux (like Pcounter with
Netware or NT). I have run only samba servers and i dont want set up an
NT-server only for
print accounting.
Thanks
Ronald.
------------------------------
From: Flavio Curti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: automatic dialup to ISP
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 09:44:52 +0200
hi
> 2nd, I've read in one of the docu-files, that it is (almost?) impossible to use
> diald, when my ISP assigns me a dynamic IP-address. Is it possible to use diald
> in this environment?
yes, it is, i use it every day with same env. (though not same provider)
... maybe you can give some more hints about your diald.conf? or try
diald-top the diald-monitoring and admin tool... are there any in-out
going packets ??
greetz
------------------------------
From: Cristian Bradiceanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: redhat.config,redhat.networking.general
Subject: multiple shaper
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 09:30:51 GMT
I am trying to get multiple shaper interfaces on a RH6.0, 2.2.10 kernel, no
success so far.
insmod shaper
shapecfg attach shaper0 eth1
shapecfg speed shaper0 32000
ifconfig shaper0 ...
route ...
everything OK
when I try
shapecfg attach shaper1 eth2
shaper: No such device
/etc/conf.modules:
alias shaper0 shaper
alias shaper1 shaper
alias shaper2 shaper
alias shaper3 shaper
Could anybody help me? I need about 6 shapers...
Thanks,
--
Cristian Bradiceanu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Subject: Re: Linux can not see more than one NIC card in one PC??
Date: 6 Jul 1999 20:26:32 GMT
I have had the same problem. I do not understand what was happening either and would
like to know as well. I did find a solution however. I was using RH5.2 and by
switching to Slackware I was able to get both of them to work. I would rather be
using RH, but until I find out how to get the two NIC's to work with it I guess I will
be learning Slackware as well. All I had to do was setup /etc/conf.modules and
/etc/rc.c/rc.inet1 files with Slackware and they both worked. I would be very
interested in kno
wing both what Linux version you are using and if/how you got them to work. Feel free
to e-mail me.
Seth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: newbie needs help
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 09:53:01 GMT
check this site
http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai
R Sweeney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:b8Dg3.733$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Anyone got a ground up resource on how I can connect my Linux machine and
> Win95 station. And I mean ground up.
> I would greatly appreciate it.
>
>
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux as the server software
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 09:53:02 GMT
Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7lrqfn$csm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am looking to setup a network as my needs are expanding and a file
> server would be better for me. With all I've read linux is the way to go.
> My question to everyone is, I do my work in MS Office 97. Can I setup
linux
> as a file server for and acces my files off of the linux server so that
> others can access the files also? Any other info is appreciated.
>
> Thank you in advance,
>
> Matt
>
>
>
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Setting up printer under Samba
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 09:53:02 GMT
check this site
http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai
Mark Six <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7lq7gq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Dear guys,
>
> I got a HP Jet Direct Print Server with lpd support which no driver
support
> under Redhat 6.0. I tried to setup the printer as remote printer using
> printtools, it is ok to print the text and postscript test page. But when
I
> load the printcap from samba and make it shareable, and also install the
> correct printer driver from HP on windows 95/98 workstations, but cannot
> print from the workstations.
>
> Anything I did wrong? I think if there is correct printer driver on
windows
> 95/98 workstations, and using Linux to print the raw data to the printer,
it
> should work, isn't it? Because I am unable to attache the printer directly
> to the lpt port of the Linux machine, but is it a problem?
>
> thanks.
>
> -------------
> Mark Six
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathan Banek)
Subject: Network Status App w/ LAN and Cable Modem
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 1999 22:19:09 GMT
I have my machine set up as a gateway between my LAN and the internet
(cable modem connection). I would like to find a network utility
(preferably X-Windows based) that can give me a rundown on the current
status of my gateway.
Specifically, I would like to know what connections are currently open,
and what transfer rates my other machines are getting on their connections
through the gateway.
Does anyone know of anything like this (or even something that might do
some of what I am asking for)?
Thanks in advance,
Nathan Banek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Let's do the SAMBA
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 09:53:02 GMT
check this site
http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai
Noisebrother <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7lnqh9$sed$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Got hughe probs with configuring SMB printer and network.
> by the way, is there way to get on the net through a win98 box without a
> proxyserver???
>
>
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: samba: connection to machine failed
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 09:53:02 GMT
check this site
http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai
Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7ln5ch$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> my machineA is running linux and samba
> my machineB is win95
> when i type "smbclient -L machineb" under linux
> it said "connection to machineb failed"
> why?
>
> --
------------------------------
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.netware.misc
Subject: Re: !!!!Logging on a DHCP netware LAN
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 1999 15:29:48 -0700
its NetWare 4.11 i believe my dad said
but i am trying to get this configured thro linux, win98 is a breeze to set up
ho i do believe i read somewhere that i would need a Netware client for linux to
connect.. but our version of NetWare does not come with a linux version cuz linux
was not out yet i think.. do u know of where i could pick this up if possible and
if it costs anything?
Roger Kresge wrote:
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >k i am getting the dhcp info from the NetWare Server. and i am logging in thw
> >the red hat 5.2 box. I know what dhcp is and i am having troubles getting the
> >netware server to assign my computer an IP address.. but I have no problems
> >getting everything setup in win98.. so my question is after i get dhcp set up
> >(if anyone know how to get the damn server to assign me an IP please tell me)
> >how do i log on to the server?
>
> Still not enough info. Since DHCP is totally different between NetWare 4.x
> and NetWare 5, I can't help you much without knowing what version of
> NetWare you're using. If you're trying to login to NetWare from the Linux
> box, I can't help. As for the Win 98 box, you can login to NetWare via IP
> in two different ways, depending on the version of NetWare - or not at all,
> depending on the version of NetWare.
>
> More info will allow us to guide you, but I won't be much help on the Linux
> box.
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: samba printing, need a little help..
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 09:53:01 GMT
check this site
http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai
Michael Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7lumvf$2rk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> I have a samba server set up, it is linked to two printers via our
> network.. The samba server can print to them fine using "lpr" and so can
> our windows machines.. However, I cannot get the linux boxes (RH 6.0) to
> print to them... help....
>
> Thank You
>
> Mike Nichols
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> no matter where you go... there you are....
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Peer-to-peer network: Linux + Win98
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 09:53:02 GMT
check this site
http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai
David Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm relitively new to advanced linux features such as TCP/ip networking,
but I
> am experiance with other networking OS's (Netware, Win9x, WinNT). I'd
like to
> configure my Win98 machine to be able to contact my Linux system on a
small
> home network I use for my Win95/98 computers. I've tried configuring both
the
> linux and W98 for TCP/IP netowrking but I can't seem to be able to get
them to
> see each other on the network. I'm a network professional and I find it
> annoying that I can't get this to work. Any sugestions, tips, or
> constructive critisism will be glady welcomed.
> My Linux system is running Mandrake 6.0 and both computers have
functioning
> network cards(NE2000 compatable). I would also humble myself to using IPX
if
> necissary.
>
> David Smith
> Websites:
> http://www.fortunecity.com/underworld/blood/592/
> http://rivendell.fortunecity.com/warhammer/169/
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Favorite Quote: "I always figured I'd get married at 30, after all Jesus
ended his life at 30" - Mark Lowry
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux as the server software
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 09:53:02 GMT
check this site
http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai
Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7lrqfn$csm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am looking to setup a network as my needs are expanding and a file
> server would be better for me. With all I've read linux is the way to go.
> My question to everyone is, I do my work in MS Office 97. Can I setup
linux
> as a file server for and acces my files off of the linux server so that
> others can access the files also? Any other info is appreciated.
>
> Thank you in advance,
>
> Matt
>
>
>
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Maguai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux drive not shown in network neighbourhood
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 09:53:02 GMT
check this site
http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai
Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7lndqi$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> my linux drive is not shown in network neighbourhood
> why?
> thx
>
> --
------------------------------
From: Eric DE VITO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: RH 6.0 & 3C905C TXM Problems
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 11:17:37 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Pfeifer wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > We just purchased some Dell Dimension machines and they come with the
> > 3Com 3C905C TXM NIC cards. RedHat claims that these cards are not
> > supported and neither are the Netgear FX310 TX nor the 3C905B TX. They
> > claim that the best card to buy is the 3Com 3c595. Unfortunately, I
> > can't find this card at our local computer stores.
> >
>
> I can't speak for the other cards, but the 3C905B TX is most definitely
> supported, at least in the 2.2.XX kernels. I never tried it with 2.0.XX.
> It is of course a PCI card. I compiled the driver directly into the
> kernel as opposed to using the module, although that shouldn't matter -
> I only did that because the card is always in use so no advantage to
> using a module.
>
> Here's the relevant portion of /proc/pci
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bus 0, device 11, function 0:
> Ethernet controller: 3Com 3C905B 100bTX (rev 48).
> Medium devsel. IRQ 10. Master Capable. Latency=64. Min Gnt=10.Max
> Lat=10.
> I/O at 0x6c00 [0x6c01].
> Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe8000000 [0xe8000000].
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> And the relevant portion of /var/log/kern.log
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 3c59x.c:v0.99H 11/17/98 Donald Becker http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux
> /drivers/vortex.html
> eth0: 3Com 3c905B Cyclone 100baseTx at 0x6c00, 00:10:5a:a6:2c:da, IRQ
> 10
> 8K byte-wide RAM 5:3 Rx:Tx split, autoselect/Autonegotiate interface
> MII transceiver found at address 24, status 786d.
> MII transceiver found at address 0, status 786d.
> Enabling bus-master transmits and whole-frame receives.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Tom
I got the same problem but instead of your message I don't get the "IRQ
10" in /proc/pci.
When I try to load the module it says : IRQ0 in unlikely to work ! and
sometimes the systems hangs up !
I tried using the 3c509bTx card with and without a aha152x scsi card,
and as a module and compiled in the kernel. I have a HP vectra VL
computer. I tried also to fix the IRQ of the PCI slot to 10 in the bios.
What can I do ?
--
Eric -
En th�orie il n'y a pas de diff�rence entre la th�orie et la pratique,
en pratique si. -- E. Chantreau
Campagne Internet-Libre/Anti-Microsoft:
http://www.caids.net/msno/msno.html#TOP
------------------------------
From: Psophos <"psophos(a"@t)my-dejanews(d.ot)com>
Subject: Re: extra email accounts on different systems
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 11:12:23 +0100
www.gmx.net - German site, German language. Does free pop3.
www.SoftHome.net - free pop3
"Ricky J. Sethi" wrote:
>
> Check out www.flashmail.com Great service, completely free, and free POP3
>
> B'ichela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Joe Keenan wrote:
> >
> > > B'ichela wrote:
<snip>
------------------------------
From: John Imrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
omp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark?
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 11:20:38 +0100
>
> well, given the roster of nations _not_ involved in WWI, it's curious what
> constitutes a world war...
>
I allways thaught that WW2 was a world war in the same way that the World series
base ball is only plaied in the US :)
The Pilgrim
------------------------------
From: John Imrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
omp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark?
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 11:25:46 +0100
>
> Exactly my point! Just *what* defines a world war? (I am aware of the
> axis alliance, the Spanish civil war etc. --- let's not forget Finland
> and Russia either!)
>
> --
Just to add fat to the fire. Hitler tried to get an alience with Britain at the
start of WW2 (when ever that was <g>). He thaught this would work as the
British Royal Family is, of cause, German.
The Pilgrim, a Europien with a British pasport
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: Samba and windows have got me baffeled ????
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 07:10:38 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
>I have set up a smb-user and set it's password but I can not
>get it to allow me to connect regardless of what I do. I can't even
>log into the Linux box FROM the localhost.
[...]
Did you use smbpasswd to do this ?
Michael
--
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
Note: If you want me to send you email, don't munge your address.
------------------------------
From: Fai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: HELP! NIS doesn't work
Date: 7 Jul 1999 11:21:36 GMT
Hi,
I am building a NIS server and follows the steps in the documentation
"The Linux NIS(YP)/NYS/NIS+ HOWTO". I have set the domainname and run
make in the directory /var/yp. I can start the ypserv and ypbind
in debug mode without any problems but when I type
ypcat passwd
I get the following error
No such map passwd.byname. Reason: YP server error.
I am using slackware 4.0.
Can anyone help me? Thanks.
--
Fai
~~~
------------------------------
From: "Andr� Ricardo Sartori" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: crond
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 08:59:14 -0300
What is a crond ??
[]'s
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: o r c @ p e l l . p o r t l a n d . o r . u s (david parsons)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Why not C++
Date: 7 Jul 1999 01:10:19 -0700
In article <7l6ah0$cu1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Nathan Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>NF Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathan Myers) wrote:
>>>
>>>C++ cannot of course be faster than the equivalent assembly
>>>code, but the C++ compiler can optimize code better than you
>>>can by hand in C, because it knows more about expressions than
>>>you can tell the C compiler.
>>
>>That was not the point. I was comparing the code generated
>>by instanciation of a template with hand written C++ code.
>>The fact that templates expand to C++ code means that
>>_templates_ cannot improve the efficiency of code.
>
>But C++ templates _don't_ expand (macro-like) to C++ non-template
>code. They expand to (if you will) RTLs, full of juicy details
>for the optimizer that would be lacking in the otherwise-equivalent
>hand-written C++ (or C) code.
That is, I hope, a feature of an implementation, not the language;
even Java, which takes nanny-state handholding to new extremes,
doesn't dare specify how a compile should proceed as part of the
language.
____
david parsons \bi/ Templates are very very sophisticated #defines
\/
------------------------------
From: o r c @ p e l l . p o r t l a n d . o r . u s (david parsons)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Why not C++
Date: 7 Jul 1999 01:14:53 -0700
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
John Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 1 Jul 1999 20:47:54 -0700, david parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>Bruce Hoult <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>Dylan is not several hundred percent slower than C as Java is.
>>
>> Have you benchmarked Java vs C on the same machine? (No, I don't
>> mean benchmarking C on a machine vs Java running on a p-machine
>> on that machine); there's certainly nothing in the design of
>> Java that would make it much slower than C on the same machine.
>
>Excuse, but:
>
>Java, even compiled to machine code, will be slower than C or C++.
I presume you have experimental evidence that supports this claim.
Care to share it?
>Java requires a run time system (ala Objective-C), making it both more
>dynamic, and slower.
Care to enumerate exactly how this make it slower?
Inquiring minds, doncha know.
____
david parsons \bi/ I can think of one runtime (garbage collection) feature
\/ that has the potential of dropping hammers into the
work, but there are some pretty clever GC's out there
------------------------------
From: Claus Bitten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problems with virtual Interfaces
Date: 7 Jul 1999 12:01:25 GMT
Hi,
Ich have a Linux-Server, who needs two IPs.
It is an out-of-othe-box RedHat 5.2-System, Kernel 2.0.36.
Installing the Interface was no problem ... but reaching it.
Within the same Subnet all other Clients can not access the virtual IP.
But for some time after they established a connection to the "real" IP of
this server, they can connect to the virtual IP.
But after some time, these connects again fail.
So in the moment the only way to access the virtual IP is to connect
(always from the same host) to the real IP.
I have set up the virtual IP with ifconfig, after that I added a route.
(It is eth0:1).
Any suggestions ?
Sincerely, Claus Bitten
------------------------------
From: "Andr� Ricardo Sartori" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Mail Server
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 08:20:43 -0300
I'm using RedHat 5.2 and like to configure MailServer (POP3 and SMTP) for
using with Outlook Express.
Howto starting and configure ???
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
