Linux-Networking Digest #824, Volume #11 Thu, 8 Jul 99 13:13:37 EDT
Contents:
e-mail doesn't get delivered on Linux system [?] (Frank Miles)
Sony Vaio 505 - compatibility with Linux (Christos Efstratiou)
Re: Can't network two PC's RH 5.3 - no-hub - WD8013 cards - coaxial (Psophos)
Re: How To Map A Drive From Window95/98 (Psophos)
Re: Setting up printer under Samba (Brad Felmey)
Re: Home Network -> Dial-up ISDN, How? (Greg Aeschliman)
Re: Re-Calculate firewall when ppp comes up ("Robert Glover")
Re: Linux can't find my modem. Eeek! ("Robert Glover")
.htaccess does not work ! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
att worldnet ppp connect troubles (Jon Kee)
multiple IP's to one interface (David Wilk)
Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (I R A Aggie)
Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (John Imrie)
Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark?
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Help Please? ("Macca")
Re: Hide Server from Browse Lists? (Scott Speights)
Re: PPP Configuration Guide/Docs? (Kevin Turnquist)
Re: Problem networking two computers WD8013 - Coax - ifconfig - route- hosts? (Jan
Oosting)
Re: Linux modem frame errors (Rob van der Putten)
Re: Apache "redirect" question (Eric Sandvik)
Re: Want to share my cable internet connection ("Strulyov, Eugene [CAR:CF79:EXCH]")
Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? ("Fredrich P. Maney")
Re: Swap space not being used??? ("YouDontKnowWho")
Re: WISECOM INTERNAL PCI MODEM (Luc Verstraeten)
Re: Weird PLIP error (Lawrence Bacon)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Miles)
Crossposted-To: linux.debian.user
Subject: e-mail doesn't get delivered on Linux system [?]
Date: 8 Jul 1999 15:13:33 GMT
I have a simple 2-machine system connected with ethernet. FTP and
telnet work fine, using either the machine names or the IP numbers.
Normally these machines are not connected to the internet, though
occasionally I do a PPP login on one machine; either machine can use
this login to communicate over that connection.
The problem is that I cannot e-mail from either machine to the other.
This problem occurs whether I use the machine name or the IP #.
However if I telnet to the other machine's port 25, then I can
successfully e-mail (in either direction). Also, e-mail works if
the sender telnets into the receiving machine, and sends the mail
to a user on that machine.
Using tcpdump, I can see that the normal e-mail method (using plain 'mail'
and exim [these are Debian/slink systems]) is making some attempt to
send the mail. Still, no mail appears to be received, since the sender
complains that the mail could not be delivered. Again, this occurs
without regard for the form of address (e.g. the host name or the IP #).
If anyone has any suggestions as to how I might further diagnose this
problem -- please tell me! Thanks!
-frank
--
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christos Efstratiou)
Subject: Sony Vaio 505 - compatibility with Linux
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 15:31:54 +0100
I am thinking about buying the Sony Vaio 505 laptop but I am concerned about
the modem/network card that it has. The card is the Platinium MC220 by COM1.
It is supposed to be a card that supports modem, ISDN, GSM and Ethernet
connection.
I have found in <http://www.snafu.de/~wehe/modem_linux.html> that this card
works as a modem but I am not sure if it's fine as an Ethernet card.
Any body had any experience with that?
Chris
------------------------------
From: Psophos <"psophos(a"@t)my-dejanews(d.ot)com>
Subject: Re: Can't network two PC's RH 5.3 - no-hub - WD8013 cards - coaxial
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 13:58:11 +0100
Co-ax. I take it you are using t-pieces & terminators.
First thing is to ping the system you are running ping on.
Run "ping localhost". Does this work?
If so then, run "ping machine1".
Where's your parallel port? I ask as it can use IRQ 7. Maybe this is a
factor?
> Doug
> --
> My opinions are mine. OK?
O.K..
------------------------------
From: Psophos <"psophos(a"@t)my-dejanews(d.ot)com>
Subject: Re: How To Map A Drive From Window95/98
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 14:02:31 +0100
Samba's your friend.
Monte posted these links:
http://www.sfu.ca/~yzhang/linux/samba/index.html
http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai/samba.html
This should do ya.
Chan Kuang wrote:
>
> I have a Red Hat 6.0 box installed with all options and my main purpose is
> to use it as my file server and also proxy server so that I can share the
> modem. How can I map a drive in my Win95/98 explorer ?
>
> Chan Kuang
--
My opinions are mine. OK?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brad Felmey)
Subject: Re: Setting up printer under Samba
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 13:01:36 GMT
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999 15:07:43 +0800, "Mark Six" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
posted:
>I want to use Linux Server as print server, with samba I can share the
>printer for Windows Platform. Sure I can directly sent the print job to Jet
>Direct Printer Server, but I would like the Linux Server handle the print
>queue.
Why on earth would you have chained print servers/queues? What is the
difference (to Windows) between sending the job to a Linux queue (and
thence on to the JD) or sending to the JetDirect queue? Do you
specifically want a slower and more complex print setup? I get the
feeling you don't have a solid grasp of what a JetDirect is. It's not
just a network interface, it's a standalone print server and queue all
by itself.
Did I misunderstand you?
--
Brad Felmey
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Aeschliman)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Home Network -> Dial-up ISDN, How?
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 14:27:21 GMT
It does support NAT. What should I read? Thanks for the help.
Greg Aeschliman
On Thu, 08 Jul 1999 11:59:23 +0200, Frank Waarsenburg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>My advice: Dump the router. Unless it supports NAT (Network Address Translation),
>because this is what you need. 192.168.x.x is not routed on the internet so it
>will never work. If your router does not support NAT, connect the TA to your
>Linux box, recompile the kernel with ipforwarding, masq and all the other
>necessary stuff (see the Howto's). Install IP Masquerading and you're on! I have
>4 PC's accessing the internet this way, in addition to the Linux box. Linux will
>be your router.
>
>Frank
>
>
>Greg Aeschliman wrote:
>
>> Ok, I'm a newbie and maybe in over my head here. I've got a home network
>> with a linux box (192.168.0.10) and my wife's win95 box (192.168.0.11).
>> No problem here. This hub is then connected to a router which is connected
>> to an ISDN/TA/DSU. This TA/DSU just emulates a modem. Before the network
>> I simple used it as a modem to dial my IP. My question: what do I need to
>> do to dial up my ISP from the Linux box and have it where both computers can
>> be connected to that ISP? I'm reading the router manual in Japanese and
>> it's hard!!! It looks like the router's IP address is 192.168.0.1. Do I set
>> that up as the default gateway on the Linux box? I'm lost. Please get me
>> going in the right direction. I'm not afraid to readthe how-to's, but I'm
>> not sure which ones I need to read at this point. Thanks for any help.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Greg Aeschliman
>> Osaka, Japan
>
------------------------------
From: "Robert Glover" <rglover@air(dot)ups(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Re-Calculate firewall when ppp comes up
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 12:36:47 -0000
What I do is I pass the arguments from /ect/ppp/ip-up.local to my
firewall script. One of the arguments $4 or $5 (man pppd) is the
assigned IP address of the PPP link. The script, ip-up.local is
called from /etc/ppp/ip-up each time an IP interface is brought up.
This way you can reset your rules each time the PPP link is restored.
Carl Filpo wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
I have set up particular firewall rules with ipfwadm.
My problem is that when the ppp link dies and comes up again the
rules are forgotton (or a new set of default rules are deployed).
I currently have some ipfwadm commands in my rc startup file
but the rules no longer apply once the ppp link is brought down,
then up again
I would like to have a particular set of firewall rules deployed each
time the ppp link is brought up. How can I do this ?
.
--
Carl Filpo
Computer Network Consultant
=================================================
Carl Filpo BSc(Curtin)
Computer Network Consultant
C&M Computer Solutions
26 Russell St
MORLEY WA 6062
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 8 9375 1144
Fax: +61 8 9375 1141
Mobile: 0407 396 316
=================================================
------------------------------
From: "Robert Glover" <rglover@air(dot)ups(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Linux can't find my modem. Eeek!
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 12:56:37 -0000
I believe that many potential respondants assumed that you meant
"Linux installations" when you said "other installations". If you
meant that your modem works under Windows but not Linux, then you may
have a win-modem: less than a modem in the classical sense, it's a
Windows-only modem. A modem that dumps much of the processing onto
the CPU instead of doing it itself. That slows your computer down
some. To make a long story short: a winmodem will not work under
Linux. You can look it up on www.dejanews.com if you doubt me.
Cloatre Yann wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
I have the same problem with my Kotex Adaptix external, when it try to
compose
or connect (if i change delay the modem hang more late...) it's hang
(initializing)
There are no solution ?
Hale a �crit :
> I have SuSE 6.1 and a PCI modem, I have a similar problem, I can get
the
> KPPP find the modem on /dev/cua0 but it hangs when it tries to set
the
> volume. I have read somewhere if the PCI modem uses shared memory
(high
> memory settings ) it will not work under linux.
>
> Britt A. Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:3Ngg3.15483$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I fired up KPPP after installing Mandrake 6.0 on my K6-2. To
my
> chagrin,
> > it couldn't find my interntal USR x2 modem. Bizarre, since my
other
> > installations could find it no problem. I've double checked that
I've got
> it
> > looking at the proper /dev/ttyXX.
> >
> > So, I backed out of X Windows and tried minicom. It couldn't
find the
> > modem either.
> >
> > Anyone have any thoughts?
> >
> > --
> > Particle Records: Surf * Punk * Garage * Rockabilly
> > PO Box 3461
> > Eugene, OR 97401
> > When they broke open molecules, they found they were only stuffed
with
> > atoms. But when they broke open atoms, they found them stuffed
with
> > explosions.
> >
> >
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: .htaccess does not work !
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 14:13:15 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My .htaccess file looks like this:
order deny,allow
deny from all
allow from <mydomain>
AuthType Basic
AuthUserFile /etc/httpd/htpasswd.conf
AuthName "Nicht f�r jeden !"
require user <myself>
Satisfy any
However, when I try to access the directory via Netscape, I get error messages
like this:
Internal Server Error
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to
complete your request.
When I look into the httpd.error_log file, I see a message:
order not allowed here.
When I remove the order, deny, allow lines, the access to the directory is
unlimited. How can I make it work ? The htpasswd.conf is configured.
Any help appreciated.
Regards, Eggert
=====================================================
Answers please in this newsgroup!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=====================================================
------------------------------
From: Jon Kee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: att worldnet ppp connect troubles
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 11:33:51 -0400
well, I'm stuck. any ideas on this one?
Jul 7 23:41:30 jkee350 pppd[847]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/cua1
Jul 7 23:41:33 jkee350 pppd[847]: Remote message:
Jul 7 23:41:33 jkee350 pppd[847]: local IP address 12.78.208.216
Jul 7 23:41:33 jkee350 pppd[847]: remote IP address 199.70.67.23
Jul 7 23:41:33 jkee350 pppd[847]: ioctl(SIOCADDRT) device route: Network is
down
Jul 7 23:41:35 jkee350 pppd[847]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
what's with the network down message? I kill the chap-secret file and naturally
i get
no IP #'s. I haven't a single clue at this point, it looks as though I get a
valid connect
and login.
using the proper connect tags for pppd i.e.. noipdefault defaultroute etc. etc.
J
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Wilk)
Subject: multiple IP's to one interface
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 07:42:06 -0400
Howdy,
I was hoping someone could point me to some documentation (if it's too
lengthy to explain via email) on how to setup a linux system (debian 2.1
in this case) to support multiple IP's per network interface. in this
particular case it will be multiple IP's for one ethernet interface for
the purpose of using IP based virtual hosts in apache. It looks like it's
easy enough to configure apache for this, but I have no idea how to
configure the network interface to support more than one IP. I've checked
the HOWTO's that looked relevant but couldn't come up with anything.
any help would be greatly appreciated!!!
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (remove the caps)
Dave
--
'Linux, choice of a GNU generation'
'My other machine is a linux box'
'What? You mean you *have* to reboot?'
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I R A Aggie)
Crossposted-To:
omp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark?
Date: 8 Jul 1999 15:28:09 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8 Jul 1999 00:48:32 GMT, Fredrich P. Maney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, in
<7m0sh0$dgq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+ I never said that WWII was costliest war that the USA has been in by
+ any measure. I said that the US lost most troops in WWII than England did.
No, you didn't.
+ So, read my post next time before you try to slam me.
Physican, heal thyself. That's to say, read what you post before you
post them:
On 7 Jul 1999 18:38:32 GMT, Fredrich P. Maney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, in
<7m06r8$lgm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+ from WWII. As for the USA benefitting from WWII, have you even *read*
+ history concerning the war and just how many US troops died? If I remember
+ the population numbers of England correctly, it was more than your entire
+ country (not just your combat dead, but your whole country).
Or did you not post this? What part of "more than your entire country",
which is in the millions BTW, is less than the casulty figures from the
US Civil War?
*sigh*
James
------------------------------
From: John Imrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
omp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark?
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 14:03:30 +0100
"Fredrich P. Maney" wrote:
> In comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix Anthony Ord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
> [deletia]
>
> : What was this about the attitude of US posters?
>
> Maybe it has something to do with the amount of material and personnel
> that the US put into the effort compared to the rest of the world.
>
Put it this way. Brittain conned the US into joining, we new about the Japanese attack
on
Perl Harber over two weeks before it happened.
With out the US the Allies would probably have won but a lot more ppl. whould have
starved.
The Pilgrim
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
omp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark?
Date: 8 Jul 1999 13:05:03 GMT
In comp.os.linux.misc Darren Winsper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
= You have a funny definition of invented. It looks more like a
= derivative of rounders to me.
I thought it *WAS* rounders...
(they just changed the sex of the players and renamed it)
For the americans out there, rounders is a girly sport...
(In fact, I think (If memory serves), rounders was harder, 'cos you had to
run with the bat rather than drop it.)
--
_____________________________________________________________________________
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]| "This is the voice of the Mysterons..... |
| Andrew Halliwell Bsc | I'm afraid no-ones in at the moment, but if |
| in | you leave your rank and colour, we'll destroy |
| Computer Science | you as soon as we get back. - The Preventers |
=============================================================================
|GCv3.12 GCS>$ d-(dpu) s+/- a C++ US++ P L/L+ E-- W+ N++ o+ K PS+ w-- M+/++|
|PS+++ PE- Y t+ 5++ X+/X++ R+ tv+ b+ DI+ D+ G e++ h/h+ !r!| Space for hire |
=============================================================================
------------------------------
From: "Macca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help Please?
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 01:42:47 +1000
Hi im a newbie,
on installing a network card (D-Link DFE 530TX) in linux and making it run
properly and connecting it to the net
i have only got a via-rhine.c file and don't know how to use it
--
Sincerley Yours,
Brendan James McKenzie
we're sorry for the delay;
your call is still in the
queue and will be answered
shortly
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Speights )
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb,linux.samba
Subject: Re: Hide Server from Browse Lists?
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 15:07:05 GMT
On Wed, 07 Jul 1999 22:43:57 -0500, Michael Sadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>I have noticed quite a bit of messages/documentation
>on how to get a Samba server to show up in browse
>lists.
>
>I have the opposite problem--I want it to disappear!
>Namely, the analog of
>
>net config server /hidden:yes
>
>Is there a specific flag which addresses this? I have
>tried a number of obvious things, but none works so
>far. I can post my smb.conf file if that helps.
>
>My guess is that it is obvious, but I can't seem to find
>it in the documentation! Any help is very much appreciated.
>
> Best regards,
> Mike
>
>
Have you tried 'browseable = no' ??
=======================================
Scott Speights
Fastrac Point of Sale
POS / Management Software for Auto Parts Distributors
and Sewing Machine / Vacuum Cleaner Dealers
reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
========================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin Turnquist)
Subject: Re: PPP Configuration Guide/Docs?
Date: 8 Jul 1999 11:13:26 -0500
Frank Waarsenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Both the LCP messages and the chat response suggest that there is no answer from the
> other end. There can be a couple of reasons for this:
> 1) Your modem does (not) adapt to the line speed. Use a dumb terminal (Or Minicom,
>if you
> have it installed) and manually dial your ISP. Check whether you get a Connect
>response
> and at what speed. See if you receive any data at all. Check your modem settings
>using
> AT&V1 or something like that (could also be AT\S, depending on the brand). If in
>doubt,
> do a factory reset. Anyway, interspeeding should be ON.
> 2) Your ISP doesn't support (async) PPP on this line. Again, using a dumb terminal
>may
> give the anwer.
Response codes are there (it indicates I'm connecting at 28800, which is
correct). It appears to be sending the username/password, because the ISP
isn't timing out the connection. It seems to think it has a serial <->
ppp0 interface, but it just never shows up.
I went to a barebones init string of AT&FV1
> Have u tried connecting to ur ISP with ur Windoze? Does that work?
Windows connects just fine (I'm presently using a Win box for a gateway,
but I'm trying to get away from that).
--
Kevin Turnquist
-----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
http://www.newsfeeds.com The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
======== Over 73,000 Newsgroups = Including Dedicated Binaries Servers =======
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jan Oosting)
Subject: Re: Problem networking two computers WD8013 - Coax - ifconfig - route- hosts?
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 12:06:22 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D.Baker) wrote:
>Subject:
>
>Problem networking two computers WD8013 io=280,irq=7,ram=0xB0000
>
>I have two machines running RH Linux 5.2. I am trying
>to network them without a hub. So I have basically
>a coaxial cable connecting the two network cards.
>
>I cannot get these cards to talk using Linux. I have
>put major time into with no luck.
>
I had similar problems with a WD8013 some time ago.
Make sure the ram at 0xB0000 is available for use in the
bios-settings, and isn't shadowed. On my motherboard i had to make
'ISA ram under 1mb' available (never seen that one on another
motherboard before, but this was at a time I almost gave up on the
stupid thing and were to install some other netcard)
If you have the dos-diagnostic stuff you can also make sure that the
right connector is used. I think it's something like. Choose
automatically between UTP and BNC
I don't know if this still holds true in PCI times, but certainly in
the old ages the RAM address of these cards should be between 0xc0000
and 0xEffff to prevent collisions with videomemory
Greetz,
Jan
------------------------------
From: Rob van der Putten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux modem frame errors
Date: 8 Jul 1999 12:27:06 +0200
Hi there
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am attempting to set up a linux proxy server and
> am encountering the same error, when I try to run
> the serial port at 115200. The problem goes away
> when I run the serial port at 57600,
Did you check your flow control?
Regards,
Rob
--
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Rob van der Putten, [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| http://www.sput.webster.nl/spam-policy.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
------------------------------
From: Eric Sandvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Apache "redirect" question
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 07:44:22 -0500
Anders Rundegren wrote:
> Yes... this is a great idea but does only solve the problem of accessing the
> toppage! I would like to have it work like the example below! More ideas?
>
> http://myserver.com -> http://otherserver.com/~user24/
> http://myserver.com/info/ -> http://otherserver.com/~user24/info/
> http://myserver.com/info/new/ -> http://otherserver.com/~user24/info/new/
>
> Again, I would like to keep the first address in the URL-field but
> displaying the content found in the second URL.
>
> Thanx // Anders
I'm guessing you have to set up your otherserver's alias as well.
------------------------------
From: "Strulyov, Eugene [CAR:CF79:EXCH]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Want to share my cable internet connection
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 09:48:58 -0400
go to www.linux.org/help and read IP masquerading howto (for 2.0.x kernels)
You may also want to read IP chains howto (for 2.2.x kernels)
Sebastien Breault wrote:
> I want to share my internet connection via a linux box. From the linux box i
> can access internet ans ping all other pc on my local network.
> Now i dont know how to confirure my linux to get access internet from my
> win98 box.
>
> eth0: dynamic IP assigned by DHCP from my ISP
> eth1: connect to my hub
> gateway ???
> default route ???
>
> what should i do to get working????
>
> please answer, i'm working on this from 1 week @$#@$
------------------------------
From: "Fredrich P. Maney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
omp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark?
Date: 8 Jul 1999 16:21:29 GMT
In comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix I R A Aggie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: On 8 Jul 1999 00:48:32 GMT, Fredrich P. Maney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, in
: <7m0sh0$dgq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: + I never said that WWII was costliest war that the USA has been in by
: + any measure. I said that the US lost most troops in WWII than England did.
: No, you didn't.
Yes I did. I said that the US lost more troops in WWII than the population
of England.
: + So, read my post next time before you try to slam me.
: Physican, heal thyself. That's to say, read what you post before you
: post them:
: On 7 Jul 1999 18:38:32 GMT, Fredrich P. Maney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, in
: <7m06r8$lgm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: + from WWII. As for the USA benefitting from WWII, have you even *read*
: + history concerning the war and just how many US troops died? If I remember
: + the population numbers of England correctly, it was more than your entire
: + country (not just your combat dead, but your whole country).
:
: Or did you not post this? What part of "more than your entire country",
: which is in the millions BTW, is less than the casulty figures from the
: US Civil War?
I am not debating that, never have, never will. I said, and I'll keep it
simple for you, "... how many US troops died? .... it was more than your
entire country." Now, where in there do I ever mention the US Civil War
or compare the number of US dead in WWII with the Civil War?
[deletia]
fpsm
--
| Fredrich P. Maney [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| President, Seventh Floor Communications, Inc. www.seventhfloor.com |
| 167 West Main Street, Lexington, KY 40507 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.maney.org ICQ# 5632845 |
=======================================================================
'An it harm none, do what thou will.
------------------------------
From: "YouDontKnowWho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Swap space not being used???
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 15:17:03 GMT
Thanks!
--
And now we return to our regularly scheduled,
uncommonly entertaining thread...
James Stafford wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>YouDontKnowWho wrote:
>>
>> How do you know what your swap file usage is?
>>
>> --
>> And now we return to our regularly scheduled,
>> uncommonly entertaining thread...
>>
>> Danny Smith wrote in message
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> >Hi there...
>> >
>> >My new RH 6.0 (as opposed to an existing 5.2) installation
persists
>> in
>> >only using about 2.3% of my 75mB swap space... any ideas? It's a
>> >bog-standard 6.0 distribution - 2.2.5 kernel, XFree86 3.3.3, on a
>> P-II
>> >300 with 64mB ram. I'm no unix guru, so I've got no idea what
could
>> >be causing this - the only possible fix I can think of is to
>> >re-compile the kernel, but I don't want to muck around with that
>> >unless I know it should work...
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >
>> >Danny Smith
>> >
>> >"Now this is a totally brain damaged algorithm. Gag me with a
>> >smurfette."
>
>Type free or top at the prompt. Top is also a menu item in X.
>
>jamess
>--
>"On the side of the software box, in the 'System Requirements'
section,
>it said 'Requires Windows 95 or better'. So I installed Linux."
>
>-Anonymous
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luc Verstraeten)
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.,fido.ger.linux,linux.dev.newbie,linux.dev.serial
Subject: Re: WISECOM INTERNAL PCI MODEM
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 15:16:22 +0200
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> I've a question referring to the modem above. I heard that it should be
> supported bij the kernel. Nevertheless I'm not able to find it. But the
> modem is recognized bij linux, but as an unknowned device. Oh, right I'm
> using kernel 2.2.5.
AFAIK, the wisecom isdn-adapters (tigerjet chip) are not supported by
Linux.
------------------------------
From: Lawrence Bacon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Weird PLIP error
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 13:03:44 -0400
Hi Jef,
This sounds like your B box is not relesing the LP port for plip
to work with, try modprobe lp, then modprobe -r lp to clear the
port for the next device to use.
I use plip all the time from a 5.2 box to a 6.0 box, if you need
more help post back to the group
HTH
Larry
El Seppe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get PLIP running on 2 slackware 3.6 boxes. It runs
> perfectly on box A ( kernel 2.0.35),
> but refuses to work on B (2.2.7). Besides the kernels, the software
> configuration is the same. Both of the boxes use a ECP parport, each
> 0x378, irq 7 (told to the kernel via LILO). On A, the plip0 device is
> created like it should, but B refuses to do so. The relevant dmesg info
> from B:
>
> parport0: PC-style at 0x378, irq 7 [SPP,ECP,ECPPS2] (like on
> the working box)
>
> parport0: unable to get hardware to register
> plip0. (NOT like on the working box)
> plip: no devices registered
>
> I tried both compiling PLIP into the kernel, and modularizing it. Both
> had the same effect.
> Can anyone give me any hints or info?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Jef Van den broeck
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
