Linux-Networking Digest #839, Volume #11 Fri, 9 Jul 99 16:13:41 EDT
Contents:
Re: NFS Install on RedHat 6.0 (Michael McConnell)
Re: pppd scripting and diald (gordo)
My machine answers to other IP addresses (Daniel Stolk)
Re: Question about Linux and resolv.conf ("YouDontKnowWho")
Any way to allow root rsh/rlogin in RH6.0?? (Will Wallace)
Re: How Do I Set up a Two-Computer Network? (Ben W.)
Re: How Do I Set up a Two-Computer Network? (Ben W.)
Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? ("Jürgen Exner")
Re: NFS PROBLEMS (David Pollack)
My machine answers to other IP addresses (Daniel Stolk)
PPP: Got dynamic IP, no ping ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Got dynamic IP, no ping ("Holger van Koll")
Re: Allow FTP access but disable interactive logins ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux - Which One? (bill davidsen)
Nets sharing IP addresses ("José Alfonso Gómez Martín")
Problems getting connected to ppp first time. (Todd Kaehler)
Transparent Proxy - ipchains question (Bayee)
Nets sharing IP Addresses ("José Alfonso Gómez Martín")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Michael McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,alt.os.linux,linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: NFS Install on RedHat 6.0
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 13:07:15 +0100
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok. I am having problems getting RH 6.0 to properly export a NFS share
> so I can install from it. Here is the situation. I have RH 6.0
> installed on my main tower, w/ copious amounts of hard drive space. I
> intend to copy the cdroms of the various distro's I'm playing w/ to
> the /pub directory. I have several 486's w/ LinkSys Ether16 cards, but
> no cdrom. I have one of the 486's w/ Slackware 4.0 on it (before it's
> cdrom crapped out), and I am trying to iron out the wrinkles of NFS
> permissions btwn the slakware box and the rh box so I can install in
> the rest of the 486's. I am using the home network address of
> 192.168.1.0 w/ netmask 255.255.255.0. My /etc/hosts on the rh box
> looks like:
>
> /etc/hosts
>
> 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
> 192.168.1.1 shaitan.milanuk.net shaitan
> 192.168.1.3 sammael.milanuk.net sammael
> 192.168.1.4 asmodean.milanuk.net asmodean
> 192.168.1.5 lanfear.milanuk.net lanfear
>
> My hosts_allow file is somewhat unclear at this time. I would really
> rather not have ALL:ALL in it; can I
> have 'nfs:192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0' to allow nfs to the local network?
>
> /etc/hosts.allow
>
> portmap: 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0
> # per Caldera 2.2 manual ?
>
> My /etc/hosts.deny is currently blank
>
> I would not like to give widespread access in my exports file,
> so here it is:
>
> /etc/exports
>
> /pub *.milanuk.net (ro)
I've limited mine by simply having: (my lan is 192.168.96.*):
/usr/doc 192.168.96.0/24(ro)
/cdimg 192.168.96.0/24(ro)
/cdspool 192.168.96.0/24(ro)
I haven't bothered restricting portmap; hopefully[1] it shouldn't cause a
problem. However if anyone knows different, let me know. :)
[1] Famous last words ;)
-- Michael "Soruk" McConnell [Red Hat 6.0 Available!]
Eridani Star System -- The Most Up-to-Date Red Hat Linux CDROMs Available
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.amush.cx/linux/ Fax: +44-8701-600807
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (gordo)
Crossposted-To: alt.comp.linux.isp,alt.os.linux.dial-up
Subject: Re: pppd scripting and diald
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 17:39:59 GMT
I'll post portions of the log file later.
What I can say is that IT Does connect
(....'' ATDT2539463100 TIMEOUT 60 CONNTECT '\d\c\' ogin: duanez
assword: []" ) but not all the time! It seems to take several tries to
get the ISP to send CONNECT and request the login.
Sometimes I can get connected really latet at night after about a
zillion tries; then, early in the morning.
If I disconnect, I can NEVER get re-connected right away. What's the
script to re-initialize the modem? And should I care about seeing
old pppd attempts remaining in the ps que?
On Thu, 08 Jul 1999 21:38:25 +0000, Daniel Farinha
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm a newbie myself, but I managed to get pppd connections. My problem is that
>most of the times the connection drops after 10-15 seconds. If I try many times
>it will eventually stay up... (does anyone have an idea why?)
>
>It would help if you can login to your ISP using something like Minicom so that
>you can actually see what your ISP expects from you.
>For example, a connection to my ISP using Minicom looks like this:
>
>login:<username>
>Password:<mypass>
>
>Protocol:ppp
>
>So, in my case I must also supply the 'ppp' string in the chatscript for the
>login to be accepted.
>It looks something like this:
>AT OK ATD9999999999 CONNECT 'ogin:user assword:pass rotocol:\dppp
>
>You might also have extra work if your ISP requires PAP authentication. I
>remember I had to edit a file for this to work (forgot which one though... does
>anyone know more about this?)
>
>Hope you get it to work.
>
>Cheers
>
>Daniel
>
>gordo wrote:
>
>> I've tried to follow Bill's advice on his page but I just can't quite
>> get a complete connection.
>>
>> I've used the command in the form of
>> /usr/sbin/pppd /dev/ttyS1 57600 debug connect "/usr/sbin/chat -v ''
>> ATD5555555 CONNECT '' ogin: [mylogin] assword: [blabla]"
>>
>> and i can trail its progress; i see it "CONNECT" and the ISP resond
>> but then the "CONNECT SCRIPT FAIL"s and then it disconnects.
>>
>> Anyone know how to use Chat properly? Share a Chat or a modem to ISP
>> connect script(s) with me? I'm soooo close!
>>
>> On Mon, 05 Jul 1999 19:00:17 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Hahn)
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On 5 Jul 1999 02:41:50 GMT, David Efflandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>On Sun, 04 Jul 1999 21:56:10 +0000, Ben Paley
>> >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>>Right, I can dial up my ISP, connect, view web pages, send mail (at
>> >>>least I can if you're reading this), but I can't seem to suss out the
>> >>>scripts to stop me having to type in the whole command line each time.
>> >>>Also, everything about diald that I've read is just so complicated...
>> >>>I'm not stupid, I'm just a Newbie, and I'm getting frustrated!
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>What whole command line? All I type is "diald" when I want it running. I
>> >>used the sample diald.conf from /usr/lib/diald/contrib/plain and think I
>> >>am using the standard connect and diald.defs, but /etc/diald.conf is set
>> >>to hold the connection up for 15 minutes (900 sec) for any connection
>> >>since I am not charged by the minute.
>> >>
>> >>I even whipped up a bash script so if I want to sent it a command instead
>> >>of 'echo "quit" >> /etc/diald/diald.ctl' all I have to type is
>> >>'ddctl quit'.
>> >>
>> >There was a short article in issue No. 41 of the Linux Gazette on
>> >setting up diald. The address is:
>> >
>> >http://www.linuxgazette.com.
>> >
>> >There is also a diald howto or mini-howto. It is several years old
>> >but might be of benefit.
>> >
>> >--
>> >Frank Hahn
>> >
>> >If it's Tuesday, this must be someone else's fortune.
>
------------------------------
From: Daniel Stolk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: My machine answers to other IP addresses
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 10:54:07 -0900
Hi, I have a network with all internet traffic going through my Red Hat
6.0
server which is connected to the internet via a DSL line. I use the
192.168.1.X
series of IP addresses for my intranet and my server has an address of
A.B.C.187 that I got from my ISP.
But when I ping A.B.C.160 or A.B.C.191, my
machine replies. I disconnected the server from the internet and from
my
intranet and pinged those two addresses from my server and got a
reply. My question is, why in the world does my machine answer to those
two
IP addresses?
Thanks for any help, Daniel Stolk
------------------------------
From: "YouDontKnowWho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Question about Linux and resolv.conf
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 18:14:12 GMT
Does Netscape have an option to start off-line?
--
Principle of Minimum Access: "That which is not explicitly permitted
is denied."
And now we return to our regularly scheduled,
uncommonly entertaining thread...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <7m3ih1$skf$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi,
>
>I have a small network, 2 Linux boxes and 1 Win NT box. One of the
>Linux boxes connects to the internet and then via ipmasquerading, all
of
>the other boxes can get to the internet.
>
>Here's the problem,
>
>I set the other Linux box up to have a default gateway of the machine
>that connects to the internet. /etc/resolv.conf looks like this:
>
>search mydomain.com (not an internic registered domain name)
>nameserver xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
>nameserver xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (these are my ISP's dns servers)
>
>If the first Linux box is not connected to the internet and someone
>using the second Linux box opens netscape to read a local html page,
>Netscape will hang for a really long time or not come back at all
>(usually just hangs probably after a time out).
>
>This is very annoying. If I remove the nameservers from the file it
>doesn't happen but then the second box can't use the internet until
the
>nameservers are put back in.
>
>I'm certain I've misconfigured something - the systems are set up
like I
>have a persistent connection to the internet which I don't. Any
ideas
>what I can change to make this problem go away?
>
>TIA,
>
>Nicci
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Will Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Any way to allow root rsh/rlogin in RH6.0??
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 11:01:42 -0700
Hello,
I have a few boxes on a private network for running some batch jobs
where security is not a concern. Is there a way to allow root access via
telnet, rsh and rlogin?
I have tried modifying files in /etc/pam.d as well as /etc/securettys
and creating a .rhosts file in /root and nothing seems to work. I know this is
absurd from a security standpoint but the boxes are on their own lan.
Thanks,
Will
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben W.)
Subject: Re: How Do I Set up a Two-Computer Network?
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 18:53:38 GMT
On Thu, 08 Jul 1999 01:54:57 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Monte Phillips)
wrote:
Here is the part I am confused about:
If I can't ping the machines, how can I set up Samba? Is Samba not
to be installed only after the LAN is successfully set up?
Ben
>Ben, What you describe is exactly the setup that is covered on the
>following sites:
>This site has a step by step howto for complete setup of samba. steps
>for both linux and the win machine. (and they really work <G>)
>http://www.sfu.ca/~yzhang/linux/samba/index.html
>and this one as well
>http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai/samba.html
>
>These sites singly or in combination are nearly guaranteed to get you
>networked.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben W.) wrote:
>
>>I have two machines I wish to network together. The connection is
>>a cross-over RJ-45 cable. Machine A will be running Linux and Machine
>>B will be running Windows 98.
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben W.)
Subject: Re: How Do I Set up a Two-Computer Network?
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 18:53:40 GMT
On 8 Jul 1999 02:15:41 GMT, "wea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here are the settings for the Linux box from netcfg (ran under KDE).
The IP address for the Linux box is 192.168.0.1. The subnet mask
is 255.255.255.0. The broadcast address is 192.168.0.255.
"Names" section
Hostname: 192-168-0-1
Domain: .192-168-0-1
Search for hostnames in additional domains: (None)
Nameservers: (None)
"Hosts" section
I.P. Host Domain
127.0.0.1 localhost LOCALHOST.LOCALDOMAIN
192.168.0.1 192-168-0-1 .192-168-0-1
192.168.0.3 192-168-0-3 .192-168-0-1
"Interfaces" section
Device IP proto atboot active
lo 127.0.0.1 none yes active
eth0 192.168.0.1 none yes active
"Routing" section
All blank except for Default Gateway device: eth0
Finally, here are the settings for the network under Windows 98.
The IP address for this machine is 192.168.0.3. The subnet mask is
255.255.255.0. Unlike the Linux box, I see no option to specify a
broadcast address. I do not know if this affects the network setup.
I.P. address: 192.168.0.3
Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0
Host name: 192-168-0-3
Domain: .192-168-0-1
All other tabs and options are left alone. Again, the biggest problem
is pinging. I can ping the machines if both are running Windows 98;
however, ping is not possible with 192.168.0.1 running Linux and
192.168.0.3 running Windows 98.
Regards,
Ben
>I think the problem is linux network setting. do you setup network card
>correct in linux system.you can type ping 162.168.0.3 in your b
>machine(linux) and if you get a wrong message,you have to type "netconf" or
>"netconfing" to check your setting.or you can tell me more about the
>information about your linux machine.
>
>Ben W. ¼¶¼g©ó¤å³¹ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>I have two machines I wish to network together. The connection is
>>a cross-over RJ-45 cable. Machine A will be running Linux and Machine
>>B will be running Windows 98.
>>
>>Configuration for Machine A:
>>I.P. Address: 192.168.0.1
>>Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0
>>Host name: 192-168-0-1
>>Domain name: .192-168-0-1
>>
>>Configuration for Machine B:
>>I.P. Address: 192.168.0.3
>>Subnet mask 255.255.255.0
>>Host name: 192-168-0-3
>>Domain name: .192-168-0-1
>>
>>
>>The biggest obstacle I have right now is pinging either machine. With
>>both Machine A and B running Windows 98, I can ping them both. If
>>Machine A runs Linux and Machine B runs Windows 98, I just cannot
>>get a ping response from either one of them. I tried typing at the
>>Linux machine the following command line:
>>
>> route add -host 192.168.0.3 netmask 255.255.255.0
>>
>>in order to add Machine B to the Linux routing table, but it complains
>>that the netmask is wrong for the I.P. address.
>>
>>Will someone please direct or suggest some extremely dummy-proof way
>>of getting my machines to recognize each other? I have read the
>>Net3-HowTo, the Ethernet-HowTo, and DNS-HowTo, but it is very
>>confusing.
>>
>>Thank you.
>>
>>Ben W.
>>Very new to Linux...
>>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Jürgen Exner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
omp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark?
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 11:08:33 -0700
Reply-To: "Jürgen Exner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On 7 Jul 1999 18:48:36 GMT, Fredrich P. Maney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > That has far more to do with the fact that Baseball was invented in
the
> > > USA than any sort of national egotism.
May I suggest to watch your own History Channel?
Baseball, this most US game of all, was actually invented in --- guess
what --- in GB.
However, I don't quite comprehend how you play baseball in Linux????
jue
--
Jürgen Exner
------------------------------
From: David Pollack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: NFS PROBLEMS
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 11:02:18 -0700
Yes the files are 755 so that is not the problem.
I will try that other thing though and tell you how it goes.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> David Pollack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am having trouble executing programs on a mounted NFS partition. I
> can
> > read and write file perfectly fine but when I try to execute anything
> I
> > get a permission denied message.
>
> are the files executable? by whom?
>
> Also when I log in as root or su to root
> I
> > don't have the power to delete the files on the NFS partition.
>
> but I think that the options
> > are
> >
> > johannes:/home/david /mnt/johannes/home/david nfs user,auto,rw 1 2
>
> you might have to add 'root_sqash' or 'no_root_sqash', not sure which.
> should be in man nfs or howto-nfs.
> i'm not on my linuxbox, find it out yourself .
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Daniel Stolk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: My machine answers to other IP addresses
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 10:55:25 -0900
Hi, I have a network with all internet traffic going through my Red Hat
6.0
server which is connected to the internet via a DSL line. I use the
192.168.1.X
series of IP addresses for my intranet and my server has an address of
A.B.C.187 that I got from my ISP.
But when I ping A.B.C.160 or A.B.C.191, my
machine replies. I disconnected the server from the internet and from
my
intranet and pinged those two addresses from my server and got a
reply. My question is, why in the world does my machine answer to those
two
IP addresses?
Thanks for any help, Daniel Stolk
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PPP: Got dynamic IP, no ping
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 18:22:57 GMT
I've been attempting to make a PPP connection to my ISP via my new
Linux box. (Windows can connect to it just fine using dial-up
networking, but I'm sick of Windows.) The kernel's been recompiled,
the correct modules have been loaded, and it seems that it works
right. The ISP authenticates and even returns its own IP address and
my new dynamic IP. I've sent the daemon.* and kern.* messages
to /var/log/daemon and looked at them--it seems that the PPP connection
is being established because the kernel is reporting what looks like
the appropriate garbage ("~y}#.!}!}!} }8}!}", etc.).
But I can't ping!
ifconfig says that I have two connections--the loopback and the PPP.
It lists my IP address and that of the ISP (and 6-8 packets sent and
received, so I know that it HAS been working), but, when I try to ping
the ISP's IP (I'm not bothering with DNS just yet), I get nothing at
all--it just seems to freeze until I press Ctrl-C. Then I check
ifconfig, and it says all those packets were sent, but none were
received.
I know the connection is still up because I can pick up the phone and
hear the carrier. I think I must be missing some vital, simple thing,
but (since I'm new at this Linux thing) I have no idea what it is.
Can some gracious soul help?
- Neil (the newbie Linux expert-wanna-be)
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Holger van Koll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Got dynamic IP, no ping
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 20:43:48 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb in Nachricht
<7m5elh$h10$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>when I try to ping
>the ISP's IP (I'm not bothering with DNS just yet), I get nothing at
>all--it just seems to freeze until I press Ctrl-C.
It could be that that machine does not answer to ping.
Try
telnet mail-server.of.your.isp 25
or 110
Do you get any response?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Allow FTP access but disable interactive logins
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 18:35:12 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marius van Wyk (remove NOSPAM.)) wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Jul 1999 13:25:19 GMT, in comp.os.linux.networking
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi, I am running Red Hat 6.0 and I was wondering if anyone knows how
to
> > configure Red Hat so that it allows a real user (ie. not an
anonymous
> > user) to login through FTP but does not allow that same user to
login
> > interactively, ie. using telnet, etc. In an attempt to achieve this
I
> > created a test account which has the following line in the passwd
file:
> >
> > test:x:522:522:Test Account:/home/test:/dev/null
>
> You must add /dev/null as a valid shell in /etc/shells. There is an
option someplace in
> ftp to disable this security option, but I can't remember for the life
of me where.
>
> Another option to disallow people would be to edit /etc/securetty and
only have local ttys
> in there.
>
> There is however the problem that people will still (depending on the
setup) be able to
> rlogin and rsh to the machine, but most versions of these programs use
the same version of
> auth as login. You just ay need to test it to make sure.
>
> Better yet, remove rsh and rlogin from your services file.
>
> There is another handy tip, changing:
> > test:x:522:522:Test Account:/home/test:/dev/null
> to:
> > test:x:522:522:Test Account:/home/test/./:/dev/null
>
> Will do a chroot (For ultimate security) on /home/test/ (See your
ftpd.conf man pages for
> this)
>
> PS: Use /dev/false instead of /dev/null, it's an executable as well as
being more apltly
> named.
>
> Anyway, hope this helped.
> M.
>
Thank you so much for the response, you really got me pointed in the
right direction and my problem is solved.
Thanks,
Dave
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bill davidsen)
Subject: Re: Linux - Which One?
Date: 9 Jul 1999 19:24:41 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| however - most distributions of linux are pretty good/ and close in
| features -
|
| choose 1 of: caldera, mandrake, or suse - i believe these all use the
| 2.2.x kernel
As do Redhat and Slackware.
--
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
The Internet is not the fountain of youth, but some days it feels like
the fountain of immaturity.
------------------------------
From: "José Alfonso Gómez Martín" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Nets sharing IP addresses
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 21:08:34 +0200
Hi guys, I have a terrible doubt, more than a doubt, a problem.Can
you help me ? I have two clients that share IP addresses. I would like
to connect to their LANs at the same time and see the computers behind
the ppp connections.
May I connect my linux box to two different private nets who share
IP addresses ? Is that possible ? May I used any kind of "bidirectional
proxy" to translate addresses ? I have heard something about NAT ? Is
that the answer ?
I know those are a lot of questions, but I´m in a terrible mess.
Thanks in advance to all the community.
Alfonso
------------------------------
From: Todd Kaehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problems getting connected to ppp first time.
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 11:24:31 -0700
Hi,
I am having a problem connecting to our PPP server the first time. I have
the problem with RedHat 5.2 and RedHat 6.0 - The example at the end is with
5.2 but when I upgrade to 6.0 the problem continued. Sometimes I need to
try 2 or 3 times before I attach (The connection drops with an loopback
error). If I redial I get in. From the messages it looks like the kernel
is taking too long to register the ppp line. The attached file shows a
sequence where I needed 2 tries to connect. Notice that the first attempt
fails before the:
kernel: PPP: version 2.2.0 (dynamic channel allocation)
happens. Then the second attempt (which is successful) happens before the
"ppp line discipline successfully unregistered".
I did not have this problem until I started a news feed to this machine
using inn. When I stop inn the problem seems to go away.
I am trying to replace our Solaris PPP server with this Linux PPP server
but will not be able to if users need to try to connect 2 or 3 times. Any
suggestions? How do I make sure the kernel ppp line is up before the pppd
drops the connection? As far as I am concerned it can just stay up (it
does not need to come up and down all the time). Solaris just keeps the
ppp network configured...
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance...
--
Todd Kaehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.psmfc.org/
Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission
45 S.E. 82nd Drive, Suite 100 . Gladstone, Oregon 97027-2522
Phone:(503)650-5400 Fax:(503)650-5426
=========messages file========
Jun 4 06:46:28 mola mgetty[9938]: data dev=ttyS0, pid=9938, caller='none',
conn
='24000/ARQ/V34/LAPM/V42BIS', name='', cmd='/bin/login', user='pppuser'
Jun 4 06:46:29 mola PAM_pwdb[9938]: (login) session opened for user
pppuser by
(uid=0)
Jun 4 06:46:30 mola login[9938]: DIALUP AT ttyS0 BY pppuser
Jun 4 06:46:30 mola login[9938]: LOGIN ON ttyS0 BY pppuser
Jun 4 06:46:30 mola PAM_pwdb[9938]: (login) session closed for user
pppuser
*** NOTE: Connection dropped here...
Jun 4 06:46:36 mola kernel: CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents of the
Universit
y of California
Jun 4 06:46:36 mola kernel: PPP: version 2.2.0 (dynamic channel
allocation)
Jun 4 06:46:36 mola kernel: PPP Dynamic channel allocation code copyright
1995
Caldera, Inc.
Jun 4 06:46:36 mola kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
Jun 4 06:47:00 mola mgetty[9941]: data dev=ttyS0, pid=9941, caller='none',
conn
='26400/ARQ/V34/LAPM/V42BIS', name='', cmd='/bin/login', user='pppuser'
Jun 4 06:47:01 mola PAM_pwdb[9941]: (login) session opened for user
pppuser by
(uid=0)
Jun 4 06:47:01 mola login[9941]: DIALUP AT ttyS0 BY pppuser
Jun 4 06:47:01 mola login[9941]: LOGIN ON ttyS0 BY pppuser
Jun 4 06:47:01 mola PAM_pwdb[9941]: (login) session closed for user
pppuser
Jun 4 06:47:02 mola kernel: registered device ppp0
Jun 4 06:47:02 mola pppd[9941]: pppd 2.3.5 started by pppuser, uid 2114
Jun 4 06:47:02 mola pppd[9941]: Using interface ppp0
Jun 4 06:47:02 mola pppd[9941]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
Jun 4 06:47:05 mola pppd[9941]: found interface eth0 for proxy arp
Jun 4 06:47:05 mola pppd[9941]: local IP address 205.230.28.5
Jun 4 06:47:05 mola pppd[9941]: remote IP address 205.230.28.38
*** NOTE - Connected to PPP sucessfully here...
Jun 4 06:47:27 mola pppd[9941]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Jun 4 06:47:27 mola pppd[9941]: Modem hangup
Jun 4 06:47:27 mola pppd[9941]: Connection terminated.
Jun 4 06:47:27 mola pppd[9941]: Exit.
Jun 4 06:49:02 mola kernel: PPP: ppp line discipline successfully
unregistered
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 03:19:08 +0800
From: Bayee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Transparent Proxy - ipchains question
Hi,
I have successfully setup IP Masquerading on my Linux box. I have
also setup the rule (using ipchains) to redirect all incoming packets to
route to a local process (a simple socket program) listening at port
9002.
% ipchains -A input xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -j REDIRECT 9002
My question is after graping all these packets, how can the local
process know where is the original destination that this packet intent
to go to ? Can I achieve this at socket programing level ? (using
SOCK_PACKET ?)
Bayee
------------------------------
From: "José Alfonso Gómez Martín" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Nets sharing IP Addresses
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 20:23:56 +0200
Hi Guys, I have a little question for you. Someone told i cannot do
this, but... Let me show you my problem.
PC A1 PC A2 PC A3 + modem a
Addr : X Addr : Y Addr : Z
----- ----- ------ line a
| | | | | |
________________________
----- -----
====== |
| |
| |
========================
__ | __
Net
A
| |
|__ __| Linux Box + 2 modems
PC B1 PC B2 PC B3 + modem
b |
Addr : X Addr : Y Addr :
A |
----- ----- ------ line
b | Address X and Y exist at the same time in
two
| | | | | |
_________________________| different locations, at least while
the connections
----- -----
====== are
up.
| | |
------------------------
Net B
I have two independent nets sharing some IP addresses. I cannot change
those addresses, but i would like to connect my linux box to those nets
using two modems. Is it possible ? May i address PCs B1 and PC A1 at the
same time ? May i use any translating software or install any kind of
bidirectional "proxy" in PCs A3 and B3 to do that translation ?
Someone told me something about NAP ? Would it be useful ?
I know those are a lot of questions, but i am in a terrible mess. I
would appreciate your help.
Thanks in advance to all of you.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
