Linux-Networking Digest #840, Volume #11 Fri, 9 Jul 99 18:13:44 EDT
Contents:
Re: network problems -- smc 1211tx, 3com, netgear hubs -- SLOW! (Prachya Chalermwat)
where is smbmount on RedHat 5.2? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Urgent diald problem (Paul Marchildon)
Re: pppd - dynamic IP ? HELP (bill davidsen)
Re: Is subnetting = ip masquerading? (M. Buchenrieder)
Re: Linux - Which One? ("Troy Knight")
Re: NutScrape problem. . .-(
IP Bandwidth Limiting per user ("DJ")
Re: 3c905b driver for Linux Redhat 6.0 (rm)
Re: NT mount to Linux-Net Use. ("Steve van der Merwe")
LINUX - SMTP works too good (Kristy)
cant mount NFS partitions ("Nagabhushan Chandrashekar")
Re: Firewall and Router separate? (Rich Roth)
Token Ring on Redhat LINUX 6.0 ("Boyd Bourque")
Re: Any way to allow root rsh/rlogin in RH6.0?? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: pppd - dynamic IP ? HELP (Clifford Kite)
Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (Anthony Ord)
Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (Hartmann Schaffer)
Re: Linux Proxy Client? ("Andrey Smirnov")
**NEWBEE** modprobe: can't locate module lo after new kernel? (Chris McGarry)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Prachya Chalermwat)
Subject: Re: network problems -- smc 1211tx, 3com, netgear hubs -- SLOW!
Date: 9 Jul 1999 19:40:05 GMT
Hi,
I don't have any problem with the 1211TX. Make sure you are using the
latest version of the rtl8139.c from beowulf.gsfc.nasa.gov homepage.
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/rtl8139.html
I have two machines running 2.0.36 kernel (RH5.2) connected together
via a crossover cable. The netperf gave me 94.04 Mbps bandwidth.
--Prachya
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Hi all. I have some problems with network speed on a small cluster.
: I have a total of 11 machines. The first 7 all use 3com NICs and are
: connected
: on a Netgear FE108 hub. The other 4 all use SMC 1211TX NICs and are
: connected on a second netgear FE108 hub. The hubs are connected via the
: first hubs uplink
: port.
: Any network op involving the SMC cards is very, very slow. They get a
: few bytes/second ftp transfers. Anything between the 3com cards is
: fairly quick -- netperf reports 6.34x10^6bits/sec throughput. I haven't
: been able to t-fer netperf over to the other boxes because htey are so
: slow on the network.
: The smc interfaces have about 600 collisions since they've been up this
: morning
: (it's an internal network, low use). The 3coms have very few collisions
: (the "head" node (which also has a token ring card) has 32000 collisions
: on the ethernet interface (750435 RX'd packets)... I don't knwo if these
: collision numbers are abnormal.
: When transferring files with the SMC cards the hubs traffic light blinks
: for each, and I don't see the colliision light blink very much. It's
: just very slow.
: Investigating some this morning I decided to make sure the cards weren't
: trying
: to run in full duplex mode, since they're on a 100mbps hub. I can't
: figure out how to tell how they are running -- the driver has an option
: to force full duplex but no way to tell it to use half (it should, I
: guess, be auto-negotiating).
: Can anyone offer any insight? Thanks!
: Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
: Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: where is smbmount on RedHat 5.2?
Date: 09 Jul 1999 16:15:24 -0400
I'm setting up a Linux workstation on an NT network. I installed RH5.2
and the version of Samba that came with it on the same CD. I have it
working far enough that I can lpr escher.ps on a non-PostScript SMB
printer. The next step is mounting shares.
There's a man page (/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p10/docs/smbmount.8) for a
program that looks like it makes mounting shares very easy, but I can't
seem to find the program anywhere. Anybody know where smbmount might
be?
In case it matters, the servers are all running NT4sp4.
--
Bruce R. Lewis <URL:http://web.mit.edu/brlewis/www/>
------------------------------
From: Paul Marchildon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Urgent diald problem
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 15:15:29 -0400
Thank you for your response
Mike Jagdis wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Marchildon wrote:
> >I am trying to get diald to work on linux 2.2.9. I am using diald
> >v.99-1.
>
> You should use 0.99.1 from http://diald.unix.ch if you use a
> post 0.16.5 version at all. There is no v.99-1 diald. There may
> be something that "just happens" to have a similar name :-).
>
I am using version 0.99.1, the dash was a mistype.
> >I now get the following error messages:
> >
> >Jul 6 17:45:39 nameserver modprobe: can't locate module tap0
>
> Read README.ethertap. If your kernel doesn't have an ethertap
> module and you don't want to build one you can add "alias tap<n> off"
> lines to /etc/modules.conf (or /etc/conf.modules or whatever your
> dist. calls it this week)
I did read that file. I include it in its entirety. Notice that there is no
mention of the use of "alias tap<n> off". Nor have I found any reference to
the need for an ethertap option in the kernel
******** README.ethertap file************************************
Ethertap is not available in 2.0 kernels so don't bother looking :-).
If you use tap you need to build a kernel with ethertap support.
If you build ethertap into the kernel it appears you only get
the one, tap0, interface. (This should probably be classes as
a bug if anyone wants to fix it)
If you build ethertap as a module you need to add lines like:
alias tap0 ethertap
options tap0 -o tap0 unit=0
alias tap1 ethertap
options tap1 -o tap1 unit=1
...
etc.
to your /etc/modules.conf.
************end of README.ethertap file*********************************
>
>
> >Jul 6 17:45:40 nameserver diald[905]: start sl0: SIOCSIFMETRIC:
> >Operation not supported
>
> 2.2 kernels don't support interface metrics. Diald tries in case
> someone was relying on it with older kernels.
>
> >Jul 6 17:45:41 nameserver diald[905]: start sl0: SIOCADDRT: File exists
>
> 2.2 kernels add routes automatically. Diald tries to add the route anyway
> because we need to do it on older kernels.
>
> >My guess is that it is looking for an ethertap as an interface. (This
> >was not compiled into the kerhel.) However, diald.conf includes the line
> >"device /dev/ttyS0"
>
> The device option gives a real interface or a device that a ppp or
> slip interface might be established on. The ethertap or slip is used
> as a proxy when there is no real interface up.
>
> >In fact, diald.conf is merely a modified version of the sample
> >diald.conf.
>
> As are all valid configs to a greater or less :-).
>
> >Can anyone help me?
>
> Uh, You seem to have forgotten to say what the actual problem is?
>
> Mike
The problem is simple: it doesn't work. When first installed, it dialed out
automatically when run. I changed some settings to get it to setup ipchains,
first in the file designated as ip-up, then in the file designated as
addroute. Neither allowed me establish a proxy server on a network. It then
stopped dialing.
Eventually, the entire ipchaining and masquerading ceased to work--this was
after my initial message to this news group. I was forced to reinstall Linux
(RedHat 6.0) and use the _same_ configuration files for named, samba,
ipchains & masquerading as before. It now works again.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bill davidsen)
Subject: Re: pppd - dynamic IP ? HELP
Date: 9 Jul 1999 19:27:43 GMT
In article <7m2sqk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Clifford Kite <kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com> wrote:
| Try using the pppd option noipdefault, and remove any pppd option of
| the form X:Y that specifies any IP address(es) X and/or Y, if present.
You need that info for demand dialing, you want the ipcp-accept options
for both remote and local. Actually, you may need these for IP
negotiation on recent versions of pppd, I have it on all scripts so I
can't tell you.
--
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
The Internet is not the fountain of youth, but some days it feels like
the fountain of immaturity.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: Is subnetting = ip masquerading?
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 13:57:06 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Reka) writes:
>Hi,
>I am a bit confused with the difference between subneting and ip masquerading
>Are they the same, in term of performing the same function?
No. They're entirely different things. Subnetting uses the netmask to
define which machines of a given IP address range belong to the same
network (with identical network- and broadcast addresses). IP masquerading
(or NAT) is used if you want to "mask" IP packets originating from machines
without routable IP addresses (e.g. 192.168.*.*) before sending them out
into the Internet. External machines will never "see" the reserved IP
addresses and instead assume that the packet comes from the machine doing
the masquerading/NAT (which they do, after all). Obviously, you'll need
to have one valid routable IP addrerss for the machine routing the
packets to the outer world (either a static or a dynamic IP address).
Michael
--
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
Note: If you want me to send you email, don't munge your address.
------------------------------
From: "Troy Knight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux - Which One?
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 21:31:48 +0100
> "I am going to setup a very small server on my home computer..."
> "... planning to have a dual-boot system..."
>
> This doesn't make sense. A server is normally a dedicated machine which
> "serves" other machines. You don't "dual-boot" a server - a server is
> SUPPOSED to stay up at all times so other machines can access it. Unless
> you provode a specific need to a very limited number of users.
I will have the server running most of the time, that doesn't stop me having
a dual boot system though does it!
I was thinking or Caldera, I have read about this having a GUI like Windows
and has an easy setup, I would reackon this would be the easiest step over
from Windows. But is it the best for networking? I need a fast OS and one
which doesn't hog the computers resources. The computer is on just a normal
connection and I won't be using it for loads of stuff, just a few of my own
websites and maybe email or newsgroup servers. Anyway, anyone have any
better ideas other than Caldera for an inexperienced Linux user(actually,
none at all). TIA
------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: redhat.networking.general,redhat.general
Subject: Re: NutScrape problem. . .-(
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 20:30:55 GMT
Thanx to all who responded to my post, I resolved the problem. It turned
out my permissions were screwed up. Alls fine now.
Again, Thanx.-)
rayc714 wrote:
> After hastling with pppd,kppp, and finally getting non-root users the
> ability to dial out, now Netscape 6.1 doesn't see the connection.
> I dial out, make the connection with my ISP, click on netscape and get an
> error message like I'm not connected.
> Anyone know anything about this?-|
>
> All help will be greatly appreciated.
>
> -Ray-
> Bronx, NY
>
> ------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: "DJ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP Bandwidth Limiting per user
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 13:32:53 -0600
I'm trying to find a way to limit a number of users bandwidth.
Our setup is an internal private IP network that runs through a Linux box
setup with ipchains masquerading out to the Internet.
Is there a way to limit bandwidth per machine or per user on the Linux box?
I thought I had read that this kind of QoS was possible in the new 2.2
kernel but I've been unable to find any information on it and would
appreciate any pointers, link, or suggestions.
Thanks,
DJ
------------------------------
From: [email protected] (rm)
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux,comp.dcom.lans.ethernet,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: 3c905b driver for Linux Redhat 6.0
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 18:51:46 GMT
Reply-To: [email protected]
have you tried ftp.3com.com??
"Daniel Domain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi there,
> Can anyone tell me where can I find and how to load and
>configure te driver and configure TCP/IP?
> Thank you.
>Daniel
------------------------------
From: "Steve van der Merwe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NT mount to Linux-Net Use.
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 22:05:15 +0200
Hi
I had the same problem!!
I solved it by:
1) creating a user account on the Linux machine
2) enabling the plain text passwords under NT
in Redhat 6.0 there is a directory called/usr/doc/samba-2.0.3/docs
there is a .reg file there called NT4_PlainPassword.reg
apply this to the registry
this seemed to work and from then on I could see all my shares etc
Hope this helps
Regards
Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <7m3b8j$q54$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>We are trying to use Net Use to mount to our Linux machine from a NT
>machine so that we can make a backup of the Linux box. We get an error
>saying that the machine is not allowed to connect to the Linux box. I
>have included the machine in the /etc/hosts file, and edited the
>hosts.allow and hosts.deny but still no luck. Am I right to assume
>that we need to use Samba? Do we need to create an user account for
>the NT machine on the Linux machine? Any good docs out there that
>could help.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Danny Antunes
>
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kristy)
Subject: LINUX - SMTP works too good
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 20:59:06 GMT
Hey Everybody!
I got the whole company on board with email on a RHLinux5.2/P2-400
server. But now the problem is everyone is sending gigantic *.avi
files and stuff. Our dinky 56K pipe is dying and we aint gots the
money to waste for more bandwidth (especially for sending naked.avi
files).
Is there a way I can limit attachments to email to say 1mb or less???
Both incoming or outgoing???
Your admin. buddy,
Kristy
------------------------------
From: "Nagabhushan Chandrashekar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: cant mount NFS partitions
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 16:56:42 -0400
Hello,
I have installed RH 6.0 on some machines on a local network
192.168.196.* ) . I have exported some directories on machine A and trying
to mount it on machine B. But I keep getting the error on B.
mount: A:/somedir failed, reason given by server : Permission denied
One think which was kinda peculiar on machine A was when I ran rpcinfo -p, I
didnt get a tcp port listing for nfs, rather just a udp..
Could anyone please point me to the possible causes ?
Any help would be greatly appreciated..
Nag
------------------------------
From: Rich Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Firewall and Router separate?
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 16:58:55 -0400
Paul Sery wrote:
>
> added a script called firewall.simpl on both the CD-ROM and my web site at
> www.swpc.com/~pgsery/LNTK. It can be used to turn a Linux box into
Opps, I think you mean "www.swCP.com/~pgsery/LNTK
I scanned your book(s) but didn't find anything about what I've got happening.
It has to do with a colocation facilty with routes going to a linux box with both
the main IP and the local LAN block on the same machine. The subnet is NOT on
the route between the colo router and the linux box. This does work similiarly
to an NT box next to the linux box, but we can't find anything setup on the NT
box to handle this special.
In other words, normally what would be the router gateway IP and a local block
(different sub-net) are on the same Linux box. The main IP responds fine, but we
can't get the sub-net (it's ...96/97) to respond. This not a masqurade, it might
be a forward, but I'm not even sure it is that.
Note: this is using 2.2.5, so there might be some filtering logic in the new
kernal, but I think I turned all the switchs properly with:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/rp_filter
Any ideas are welcome.
--
Rich Roth On-the-Net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.east.on-the-net.com
~~~ Add Instant Depth to your Website from www.i-depth.com ~~~
~~~ Adding depths to Web presences and Internet providers ~~~~~
------------------------------
From: "Boyd Bourque" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Token Ring on Redhat LINUX 6.0
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 15:57:52 -0500
I am trying to configure a LINUX machine with an IBM Auto 16/4 Token Ring
NIC. I am using the ibmtr.c that is supplied with the Redhat distribution.
I am not able to make the OS see the NIC. If anyone has advice or
experience with a similar setup, I would appreciate any information you
could share.
Thank you,
Boyd Bourque
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Any way to allow root rsh/rlogin in RH6.0??
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 20:28:54 GMT
Try using secure shell. It checks permissions, and the ecrypted keys
add some security. You can ssh as root in RH 6.0.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Will Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a few boxes on a private network for running some batch
jobs
> where security is not a concern. Is there a way to allow root access
via
> telnet, rsh and rlogin?
>
> I have tried modifying files in /etc/pam.d as well as
/etc/securettys
> and creating a .rhosts file in /root and nothing seems to work. I
know this is
> absurd from a security standpoint but the boxes are on their own lan.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Will
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: pppd - dynamic IP ? HELP
Date: 9 Jul 1999 15:16:51 -0500
bill davidsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: In article <7m2sqk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
: Clifford Kite <kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com> wrote:
: | Try using the pppd option noipdefault, and remove any pppd option of
: | the form X:Y that specifies any IP address(es) X and/or Y, if present.
: You need that info for demand dialing, you want the ipcp-accept options
: for both remote and local. Actually, you may need these for IP
: negotiation on recent versions of pppd, I have it on all scripts so I
: can't tell you.
Yes you need both the address specification and the accept options
for demand dialing with pppd, but nothing in the original post hinted
at demand. In fact the problem he had is serious with demand since
you can't specify 0.0.0.0 as the local address either explicitly or
implicitly, which is the standard way to ask the peer to supply you
with your IP address for a PPP connection. If you know a way around it,
I'd love to hear it.
You don't need the accept options when not using demand and there's no
pppd IP address(s) specified. The noipdefault option will stop pppd
from offering an IP address it gets from the hostname and pppd will
do the right thing - accept reasonable IPs from the ISP.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* The wealth of a nation is created by the productive labor of its
* citizens. */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anthony Ord)
Crossposted-To:
omp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark?
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 17:30:00 GMT
On 07 Jul 1999 12:01:16 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul
D. Smith) wrote:
>%% De Messemaeker Johan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> dmj> "Paul D. Smith" wrote:
<snip>
> dmj> Didn't you had history-classes ? Before the US got involved,
> dmj> Europe and Northern Africa was on fire, there was a
> dmj> German-Russian alliance, and Japan was fighting the
> dmj> Chinese. Pretty big area, 3 continents. But the US wasn't (yet)
> dmj> involved so it wasn't a worldwar :-)) nice, very nice :-)
>
>I never said the U.S., per se, had to be involved.
>
>Hmm. So you're saying that without any participation by any country on
>one side of the world, it's still a _world_ war? Nice, very nice.
The Canadians were involved and sent soldiers. Perhaps
you've heard of Canada?
>Or, put another way, would you call a war that didn't involve _any_
>European countries a world war? Uh huh.
No. All the continents need to be involved (even if only
slightly - Antarctica doesn't count because there are no
people there).
>Always good to know where our respective prejudices lie :).
Indeed.
Regards
Anthony
--
=========================================
| And when our worlds |
| They fall apart |
| When the walls come tumbling in |
| Though we may deserve it |
| It will be worth it - Depeche Mode |
=========================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hartmann Schaffer)
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark?
Crossposted-To:
omp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 21:10:58 GMT
In article <7m2jj6$mf$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Fredrich P. Maney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix Jon Skeet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [deletia]
>
>: What does where it was invented have to do with anything? It's still
>: incredibly silly to call a competition in one country a World Series. I
>: really don't see what its invention has to do with anything...
>
> Well considering that outside of Japan, to my knowledge the US and
> Canada are the only places where Baseball is played. The governing
Then please explain how all these all these Carribean and South and
Central American players in professional baseball learned their skills.
Isn't Cuba the dominating country in amateur baseball? Hasn't Taiwan
wone some international (mpt World) chamionship lately?
> bodies of Baseball are in the US, most of the players/teams/fans
> are in the US. Seems to make perfect sense to me that the World
> Series (the pinnacle of baseball) would be played in the US.
Until not too long ago it was restricted to teams from the US. Strange
World chamgionship. (For non NOrth American readers who wonder: afaik
the series is named after a now defunct New York Newspaper that donated
some kind of prize for it)
--
Hartmann Schaffer
It is better to fill your days with life than your life with days
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux Proxy Client?
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 13:08:41 -0700
Your MS-Proxy server needs to be configured to do SOCKS proxy, then you will
be able to use services other then http via proxy server.
Good luck!
Dave Berton wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I just installed Caldera OL 2.2 and all went well. I was even able to
>configure the Netscape browser to use our company network proxy server
>(Microsoft Proxy) to get out to the internet.
>
>My question is: how can I set up Linux with some sort of general proxy
>client (similar to the Microsoft Proxy Client which I use on my NT
>system)? I have a static IP address, but I am unable to connect
>through our Windows Proxy server for regular ftp and newsgroup access
>using Netscape news reader or Krn.
>
>What must I do to enable newsgroup access through a windows proxy
>server?
>
>db
------------------------------
From: Chris McGarry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: **NEWBEE** modprobe: can't locate module lo after new kernel?
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 14:31:51 -0700
I had everything working fine no errors in /var/log/messages on my
"stock" RedHat 6.0 system. I downloaded 2.2.10 Kernel, make menuconfig,
make dep, make bzImage, make modules, make modules_install and now I'm
receiving the errors below. Any ideas? Did I miss something in
menuconfig? Also when I ran "make menuconfig" I choose not to add
support for a 3com card I have in the system but do intend to use it I
thought I could add it later as a module in file /etc/conf.modules is
this true??? I think I know just enough to be dangerous : )
Thanks,
Chris
modprobe: can't locate module lo:1
modprobe: can't locate module lo:2
============
============
modprobe: can't locate module lo:48
modprobe: can't locate module lo:49
network: Bringing up interface lo succeeded
then
modprobe: can't locate module eth0:1
modprobe: can't locate module eth0:2
============
============
modprobe: can't locate module eth0:48
modprobe: can't locate module eth0:49
network: Bringing up interface eth0 succeeded
then
modprobe: can't locate module eth1:1
modprobe: can't locate module eth1:2
============
============
modprobe: can't locate module eth1:48
modprobe: can't locate module eth1:49
network: Bringing up interface eth1:succeeded
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
