Linux-Networking Digest #866, Volume #11         Sun, 11 Jul 99 22:13:34 EDT

Contents:
  good ISDN modem (mango)
  R: help with NE2000 isa pnp card needed ("Leimaster")
  Redhat 6.0 and NFS ("Richard E. Robbins")
  XXX CONTENT 56645 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  routed - questions (Mark Johnson)
  Re: X Terminal Under Linux - Where can I get the software? (Alexander Atkin)
  Re: diald too frequent (Lim Chee Onn)
  Re: Linksys Card (JunkDTectr)
  Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? ("Chad Mulligan")
  bind-8 compile on linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: routed - questions ("ProZaCh!")
  Re: subnetmask (function) / Funktion der Subnetmask ("Frederick W. Reimer, Sr.")
  Re: Swap over NFS ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (Paul D. Smith)
  Re: Cannot smbumount Windows share ! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 19:23:20 -0400
From: mango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: good ISDN modem

any body know a good ISDN modem for RH Linux 6 or SuSE 6.1 that will
bond both B channels together?


------------------------------

From: "Leimaster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: R: help with NE2000 isa pnp card needed
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 02:22:46 +0200

You should...in prompt line... do the follow:
 "modprobe ne io=0xHHH   "
 ( HHH will be your card address...300,320,and so...)
 if you detect your card you need to edit your conf.modules file under /etc
 dir
  "vi conf.modules"
 and  be sure that you have something like this:
 "alias eth0 ne
 options ne io=0xHHH"
 save
 reboot
 And enjoy
 Bye

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 7m8d4q$e5i$[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> HI all:
> I have set up RedHat Linux 5.2 with an NE2000 (clone) PnP isa card.
> First Linux5.2 did not detect my card, so I ran "isapnp" and "pnpdump".
> They went fine, the card was detected, and I was able to ifconfig and
> route.





------------------------------

From: "Richard E. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Redhat 6.0 and NFS
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 18:58:32 -0500

Are there any known problems with Redhat 6.0 and NFS?  I never had problems
with Redhat 5.2.  Now, whenever I try to mount something that is exported I
find that the client is refused due to a permission failure.  I had a stable
set up with 5.2.  Is there anything that changed in terms of NFS
configuration from 5.2 to 6.0?

-- Rich



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.lynx
Subject: XXX CONTENT 56645
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sunday, 11 Jul 1999 16:33:02 -0600

This is for Adults Only:

http://207.240.225.250

* 18+ Only  Please!









.


pgU2AB?H."

------------------------------

From: Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,linux.sources.kernel
Subject: routed - questions
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 18:28:13 -0600
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I have a RH5.1 system, and have upgraded the kernel to 2.2.9. (I believe
I've upgraded everything else as required by the kernel upgrade.) I also
installed ipchains and diald, and found it necessary to modify several
scripts to add routes.

I noticed this message, repeated every few seconds, in my logs:
Jul 11 11:50:46 oldbox routed[374]: packet from unknown router,
127.0.0.1

Questions:
1. Why do I get this message, and what can I do to eliminate the
kernel's puzzlement over this "router"?

2. I tried:
/etc/rc.d/init.d/routed stop
routed -g -d
and got a Segmentation Fault. I can't seem to determine the routed
version, but it has a 5/98 compilation date, so I guess its the one that
came with RH5.1. How can I tell whether this routed is consistent with
my kernel?

3. I added the -d (more debugging option) to the invocation of routed in
/etc/rc.d/init.d/routed, but the system hung there after rebooting. Why?

4. I installed routed-0.10-8.src.rpm, and untarred
netkit-routed-0.10.tar.gz, but can't find routed.c! Where's it at?

Thanks for any clues you can give me!


------------------------------

From: Alexander Atkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: X Terminal Under Linux - Where can I get the software?
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 01:38:54 +0100

Im starting at the beginning.
The X Terminal remote boots from the network but I dont know how to setup
Linux
to send the necessary software to the terminal or where to get the software
from that
it needs to send.

Alex.

Chris Harshman wrote:

> What precisely are you trying to do?  Run software on your
> Linux boxes, that use the Sun X-Terminals as the display/
> keyboard/mouse?  You should be able to call up 'telnet'
> on the X terminal, and then run the application (e.g.,
> Netscape) with the display as an argument (e.g.,
> `netscape -display xterminal03:0`)
>
> Alexander Atkin wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > At work we have several Sun 3/50 X-Terminals.  They run on Motorola
> > 68020 I think.
> > I downloaded the specs from Sun and several other places but cannot find
> > the necessary software for Linux.
> >
> > I am running Slackware 3.5 with X-Free86 3.3.2.
> > I am very much a novice with X, a real pain to try and get working at a
> > decent speed on a 486 which is mostly why we plan to use a 486 per
> > machine (or maybe even more than one 486 for each terminal if someone
> > tells me how its done) for the program tasks and the X-terminal for
> > graphics as 486's tend to have crap graphics cards.
> > We have tons of 486's that we could use, most of which are 100Mhz and
> > even a few Pentium Overdrive machines, so getting the computer side is
> > not a problem.  Just configuring and software.
> >
> > I know enough about Linux to set up a simple router, fileserver,
> > printerserver (all on one 486 DX4/100) so im not a total novice.  But X
> > certainly is the most tricky part to get working.
> >
> > Alex.
> >
> > --
> > Alex's Child-Starlets & Young Actresses Web Site
> >
> > Madeline Zima, Mae Whitman, Mara Wilson, Mary-Kate & Ashley Olsen,
> > Michelle Trachtenberg, Nikki Dunaway, Sarah Rose Karr, Thora Birch,
> > Tina Majorino.
> >
> > Mae Whitman DVD Digital captures now online for
> > "Hope Floats" & "The Gingerbread Man".
> > Look out for more Digital DVD Captures coming soon!
> > See the website for more information
> >
> > Check it out at:
> > http://www.geocities.com/hollywood/hills/9857/index.html
> >
> > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]          ICQ#: 30241307
>
> --
> chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------
> "If there is hope," I said, quoting Orwell, "it lies in the proles."
> The Billionaire pressed his fingertips together, considering.  "Nah,"
> he said, finally, and flipped The Switch.

--
Alex's Child-Starlets & Young Actresses Web Site

Madeline Zima, Mae Whitman, Mara Wilson, Mary-Kate & Ashley Olsen,
Michelle Trachtenberg, Nikki Dunaway, Sarah Rose Karr, Thora Birch,
Tina Majorino.

Mae Whitman DVD Digital captures now online for
"Hope Floats" & "The Gingerbread Man".
Look out for more Digital DVD Captures coming soon!
See the website for more information

Check it out at:
http://www.geocities.com/hollywood/hills/9857/index.html

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]          ICQ#: 30241307



------------------------------

From: Lim Chee Onn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: diald too frequent
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 21:51:52 +0800

Mark wrote:
> 
> I've been having the same problem - about every three minutes diald
> dials out when it receives this:
> Jul  7 19:04:14 pigpen diald[9119]: filter accepted rule 1 proto 6 len
> 44 seq b99ca5e ack 0 flags  SYN packet 192.168.0.1,26879 =>
> 205.197.182.100,143
> Jul  7 19:04:15 pigpen diald[9119]: Running connect (pid = 11573).
> Jul  7 19:04:15 pigpen diald[9119]: filter accepted rule 1 proto 6 len
> 44 seq e1e6fa09 ack 0 flags  SYN packet 192.168.0.1,26880 =>
> 205.197.182.100,143
> 
> Any help tracking down whatever is sending this request to my ISP would
> be greatly appreciated.  This is with RH 5.2 dist 2.0.36 kernel, and
> Diald 0.16.5a-2.  I'm also running Masquerade and firewall.  This
> happens even with all the other boxes (Win 98, 95 and Linux) shut down
> on the local net.
> 
[Posted and mailed]

Someone is accessing a IMAP server on 205.197.182.100. Check to see if
you are running any processes that are checking a IMAP periodically.
M$-Outlook Express seems to default to checking your mailboxes at a
preset interval.

Cheers
-- 
=====================================================================
Passengers of the mothership earth, these are your children speaking.
When disembarking, please leave a good clean environment behind.
Thank you.
=====================================================================
Alex C. O. Lim
VCN Technology Sendirian Berhad
http://www.vcn.com.my
Future Trend Computer Services
http://www.ftrend.com.my
=====================================================================

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (JunkDTectr)
Subject: Re: Linksys Card
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 00:46:01 GMT

On Sun, 11 Jul 1999 14:53:41 GMT,  In comp.os.linux.networking, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> [Posted and mailed]
> 
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>       [EMAIL PROTECTED] (JunkDTectr) writes:
> > On Sat, 10 Jul 1999 01:25:59 GMT,  In comp.os.linux.networking, 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> >> 
> >> I had the same problem. You MUST get the later driver, at least .90 .
> > 
> > I can't say why it works for me, I don't know of anything I've 
> > done out of the ordinary.  Seems like I may have run modprobe 
> > and/or maybe insmod.  
> > 
> > I have 2 of the things in my stock RH5.2 system using the stock 
> > Tulip v0.89H modules.  No compiling, nothing.  I'm kind of 
> > peculiar that way, I like to keep things as stock as possible.
> 
> First, there are at least two major versions of the Linksys LNE100TX.  One
> uses the "genuine" DEC Tulip (21140, I believe) chipset.  This board works
> fine with the older 0.89H driver that comes with kernels through 2.2.9 (at
> least; I've not checked later kernels).  The second variety uses a PNIC
> clone of the DEC Tulip.  This version may not work with that driver (my
> card certainly doesn't).

I have 2 of the "Linksys" stenciled chips in my Linux box here at 
the house (later version of the PNIC chip).  I believe mine are 
the later 82c169 chips, my dmesg reports 82c168 but I think I 
checked them before I put them in.

I have several of the PNIC stenciled chips and at least one of 
the DEC chips in some of my test machines at my office.
 
> Second, I've heard that PNIC-based Tulip clone boards do sometimes work
> with the older Tulip drivers *IF* their firmware is of a certain
> revision.  I don't know the details on this, but I've heard that some
> people had problems with such boards with some firmware revisions but not
> others.  It's possible that the Linksys is like this, but I've never
> looked into it -- using a newer Linux driver is easy enough for me.

There are 2 versions of the Linksys stenciled chips, one marked 
82c168 and one marked 82c169.  Info can be found at :
http://www.linksys.com/scripts/dlc.asp - select 10/100 card in 
the selection box.

The 8c168 chip seems to have a problem being redetected by Win98 
and has a ROM update.
 
 
-- 
I read the groups I post to, no need to email me.

------------------------------

From: "Chad Mulligan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
omp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark?
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 16:41:17 -0700


Paul D. Smith wrote in message ...
>%% [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anthony Ord) writes:
>
>  >> Hmm.  So you're saying that without any participation by any
>  >> country on one side of the world, it's still a _world_ war?  Nice,
>  >> very nice.
>
>  ao> The Canadians were involved and sent soldiers. Perhaps
>  ao> you've heard of Canada?
>
>You're right; I should have stuck with my original comment and said
>s'thing like "without _hardly_ any participation".
>
>Yes, Canada declared war when Britain did.  But Canada had a standing
>army of only about 4,000 troops, they were still smarting from WWI and
>public opinion was still almost 3-1 against entering the war.  By the
>end of the war they had many more troops and made some important
>contributions, of course, but early they were hardly a factor, besides
>moral support (obviously I don't want to diminish any individual
>sacrifices and I'm sure there were many--we're talking solely about
>macro-level participation).

Explain the 1500 Canadian Commando casualties and Dieppe in 1943 then.  They had a
much larger presence than you indicate here.

>
>  >> Or, put another way, would you call a war that didn't involve _any_
>  >> European countries a world war?  Uh huh.
>
>  ao> No. All the continents need to be involved (even if only slightly
>  ao> - Antarctica doesn't count because there are no people there).
>
>Well, that's certainly one reasonable way to define it, I agree.
>
>Another might be that the top X military and/or economic powers had to
>be involved.  It's a good bet that, even back then, the U.S. would be
>included there even for relatively small values of X.
>
>--
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>         Network Management Development
> "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   These are my opinions---Nortel Networks takes no responsibility for them.



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: bind-8 compile on linux
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 12 Jul 1999 01:00:24 GMT

I've tried to compile bind-8 on PPC linux using glibc-2.1.1, egcs-19990629,
and binutils-2.9.4.0.7.  The compile stops with some undefined symbols
like __memputs, __memgets etc.  I ran nm  in my libs directory and
found no library with those symbols.  Anybody know what's going on?

Fred



------------------------------

From: "ProZaCh!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,linux.sources.kernel
Subject: Re: routed - questions
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 23:21:27 +0000

Mark Johnson wrote:

> I have a RH5.1 system, and have upgraded the kernel to 2.2.9. (I believe
> I've upgraded everything else as required by the kernel upgrade.) I also
> installed ipchains and diald, and found it necessary to modify several
> scripts to add routes.
>
> I noticed this message, repeated every few seconds, in my logs:
> Jul 11 11:50:46 oldbox routed[374]: packet from unknown router,
> 127.0.0.1
>
> Questions:
> 1. Why do I get this message, and what can I do to eliminate the
> kernel's puzzlement over this "router"?
>
> 2. I tried:
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/routed stop
> routed -g -d
> and got a Segmentation Fault. I can't seem to determine the routed
> version, but it has a 5/98 compilation date, so I guess its the one that
> came with RH5.1. How can I tell whether this routed is consistent with
> my kernel?
>
> 3. I added the -d (more debugging option) to the invocation of routed in
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/routed, but the system hung there after rebooting. Why?
>
> 4. I installed routed-0.10-8.src.rpm, and untarred
> netkit-routed-0.10.tar.gz, but can't find routed.c! Where's it at?
>
> Thanks for any clues you can give me!

You probably know that 127.0.0.1 is the loopback device for your computer.
It is necessary for networking, but it's not a router.  Something is
probably wrong with your startup scripts.  What type of network connection
are you using?  You might not even need to run routed.

Routed 0.10-8 comes with RH 5.1, so you shouldn't need to reinstall it


I'm not familar with the packages you downloaded, but here are some tips:
-To find out where rpm put files, enter "rpm -ql <package name>"
-There might not be a "routed.c" file.  Look for and INSTALL, README,
configure in the base directory.

Good luck,
-Zach




------------------------------

From: "Frederick W. Reimer, Sr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.os2.networking.tcp-ip,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networks
Subject: Re: subnetmask (function) / Funktion der Subnetmask
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 21:06:32 -0400

Thomas Kuiper wrote:

> Hi R.L.,
>
> the computer always can assume that since Subnetting is only a _local_
> configuration, you can have other hosts in the network with other Subnet
> Masks, it wouldn't matter. Besides 192.10.10.10 and 192.20.20.20 with a
> Subnet Mask of 255.255.255.192 are definetly not in the same network :-)
>
> With a Subnet Mask of 255.255.255.192 you divide a already existing
> Class C Network into 4 new Nets.
>
> Host ranges:
> 192.10.10.1   -> 192.10.10.62  (Broadcast 192.10.10.63)
> 192.10.10.65  -> 192.10.10.126 (Broadcast 192.10.10.127)
> 192.10.10.129 -> 192.10.10.190 (Broadcast 192.10.10.191)
> 192.10.10.193 -> 192.10.10.254 (Broadcast 192.10.10.255)
>
> You always "lose" one IP address
> for the Network and one for the Broadcast address.

Be careful there!  The all zero's subnet part is often reserved for "this" subnet and
the all ones for "all" subnets.  So with a 2-bit mask (ha) you only can count on two
subnets, not four.  Most modern routers and systems can use the "zero" subnet, but
this usually needs to be turned on (default is not to allow it).

Fred



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Swap over NFS
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 00:45:18 GMT

In article <XNUh3.608$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mike) wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marc Mutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> Andreas Jaehnigen wrote:
>>> Every document about diskless clients I read so far doesn't mention
>>> this topic.... (?!)

>> Simply because it would be tooooo slow.

> that would be a dumb reason NOT to mention this

...Especially since it's completely wrong.

Swap over the network can be as fast if not *faster* than swap to the
local disk.  Here's how:

1) Use *fast* networking [think: gigE] on a local private segment.
2) Connect the NFS client to the private segment via a dedicated nic.
3) Turn on "jumbo" packets on the private nic.  [That one is via a
suggestion from a prior poster in a similar thread]
4) Give the NFS server *lots* of very fast RAM [think: eccs].

Using a configuration like that above, I'd put my money on swapping to
the network any day.

--
Bill Clark
Systems Architect
ISP Channel
http://neighborhood.ispchannel.com/


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul D. Smith)
Crossposted-To: 
omp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark?
Date: 11 Jul 1999 21:30:32 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

%% "Chad Mulligan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

  >> Yes, Canada declared war when Britain did.  But Canada had a standing
  >> army of only about 4,000 troops, they were still smarting from WWI and
  >> public opinion was still almost 3-1 against entering the war.  By the
  >> end of the war they had many more troops and made some important
  >> contributions, of course, but early they were hardly a factor, besides
  >> moral support (obviously I don't want to diminish any individual
  >> sacrifices and I'm sure there were many--we're talking solely about
  >> macro-level participation).

  cm> Explain the 1500 Canadian Commando casualties and Dieppe in 1943
  cm> then.  They had a much larger presence than you indicate here.

Please re-read what I wrote.  Last time I checked, 1943 was after 1941,
and certainly after 1939.

-- 
===============================================================================
 Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>         Network Management Development
 "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
===============================================================================
   These are my opinions---Nortel Networks takes no responsibility for them.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cannot smbumount Windows share !
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 13:26:28 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Thu, 08 Jul 1999 11:29:29 +0200, Andrew Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>I use umount if smbumount has problems.
>
That simple ? It works ! Thanks

=====================================================
Answers please in this newsgroup!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

=====================================================

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to