Linux-Networking Digest #884, Volume #11 Tue, 13 Jul 99 12:13:33 EDT
Contents:
Re: IP Masquerade vs proxy ("Jens S�lwald")
Redhat 6.0 mail problem ("James")
Re: rsh - permission denied ("William R. Mattil")
Re: Ping ? ("William R. Mattil")
Re: Redhat 6.0 mail problem (Nguyen-Dai Quy)
Re: HELP ME !!! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Redirecting to cgi's with POST ("William R. Mattil")
Re: /etc/ppp/peers/... permission denied (?) (Clifford Kite)
Re: 100 Base-T & 32bit 33MHz PCI (Rod Smith)
Re: Samba--the basics (max)
TrueType fonts server ??? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: windows 98 can't see Linux machine using Samba (Monte Phillips)
Problems with DE500-BA NIC and 100Mb full duplex ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Subnet (Bob)
Re: no ptys available (VBF-Ratingen GmbH)
Re: Samba & win98 long file names ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Network in a box? ("Dino7")
Re: NFS mount with DHCP client (Christoph Passon)
LET BORLAND KNOW LINUX *IS* A RIPE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPEMENT TOOLS MARKET!!!
(ReplyTo_PlatoAtAccesswestDotCom)
Samba-PC can't be seen (VBF-Ratingen GmbH)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Jens S�lwald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP Masquerade vs proxy
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 14:20:47 +0200
Joe O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
7k6tj9$hb0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I've used a proxy server in a Windows LAN, and I've recently installed a
> Linux file server for this Windows LAN (about 15 nodes). I don't
understand
> the difference between a proxy server and IP masquerade. Are they the
same
> thing? I've set up and maintained WinProxy, which is a program that
> provides Internet service to the LAN using a single IP address. Isn't
this
> the same concept as IP masquerade with only a different name?
WinProxy uses NAT (Network Adress Translation) and is not only a proxy.
------------------------------
From: "James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Redhat 6.0 mail problem
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 20:37:38 +0800
Hi! Everyone:
I bought a DELL-installed Red Hat Linux, and ship it to some ISP to
co-locate it, I thought DELL should configure everything right, but it seems
I can run all the HTML and cgi with no problem, but I can't receive and send
email , can any experience expert tell me how should I do to set the mail
server up and running ?
Regards,
James Hsieh
------------------------------
From: "William R. Mattil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: rsh - permission denied
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 07:44:04 -0500
Madeleine Robert wrote:
> From a root node I want to "cat /proc/modules" on a diskless client. I
> run:
>
> rsh child0 "cat /proc/modules"
>
> I get:
>
> rcmd: socket: Permission denied
>
> Any clues? Thanks...
Assuming ...... (dangerous I know :^) ) that your /etc/hosts.allow and
/etc/hosts.deny are set up in a SANE manner , the user that is to be
allowed rsh/ or other "r" commands needs to have an entry in his/her home
directory called .rhosts formatted as follows:
hostname.domainname.xxx
and this file needs to be chmod'd to 600
If this is done correctly then you should have access to the Berkeley "r"
commands: rlogin,rcp,rsh etc
If it still doesn't work, your distribution may have paranoid defaults and
you can inspect /etc/pam.d/*
Hope this helps....
Bill
--
William R. Mattil | Fred Astaire wasn't so great.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Ginger had to do it all backwards
(972) 399-4106 | and... in high heels.
------------------------------
From: "William R. Mattil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Ping ?
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 07:46:59 -0500
Roelf Schreurs wrote:
> I am looking for a program that pings several devices (routers, terminal
> servers ...) every couple of minutes, say every 5 minutes.If the device
> doesn't reply it displays an error.
> (I've got a program running on windows that does this)
> Anybody know of anything?
>
> Roelf Schreurs
> Crossroads Distribution IT
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes,
You can wrap "ping" inside a shell script which will work or probably a
more elegant solution would be to locate fping and use it instead. It
handles a host not available situation better than ping and is more
versatile.
Regards
Bill
--
William R. Mattil | Fred Astaire wasn't so great.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Ginger had to do it all backwards
(972) 399-4106 | and... in high heels.
------------------------------
From: Nguyen-Dai Quy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Redhat 6.0 mail problem
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 15:52:14 +0200
James wrote:
>
> Hi! Everyone:
> I bought a DELL-installed Red Hat Linux, and ship it to some ISP to
> co-locate it, I thought DELL should configure everything right, but it seems
> I can run all the HTML and cgi with no problem, but I can't receive and send
> email , can any experience expert tell me how should I do to set the mail
> server up and running ?
PPP-HOWTO !
--
NGUYEN-DAI Quy
LTAS-M�canique de la Rupture des Solides, Universit� de Li�ge
Rue Ernest Solvay 21, B�t C3, B-4000, Li�ge, Belgique.
T�l:+32-4-3669324 (bureau) 3491529 (domicile) Fax:+32-4-3669311
http://bobo.ltas.ulg.ac.be/~quy
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HELP ME !!!
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 13:36:54 GMT
IF you are willing to spend a little money, go check out
http://www.tutsys.com. They have a product that extends 500 ft and
uses a phone line, but @ only 1MB speed.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have this amusing mental picture of two teenagers stringing up 3 km
> of UTP on the telephone poles between their two houses <VBG>
>
> Sasha: You've picked an expensive and challanging (some would say
> "near impossible) project. Outside of the extensive effort in
stringing
> 3 Km of cable between your house and your friends house (not to
mention
> the repeaters necessary to extend Ethernet or Token Ring that
distance),
> you are limited to either (a) the less reliable and more expensive
> alternative of using microwave or laser communications between houses
> (you need clean line-of-sight, and will suffer from both a large one-
time
> setup expense, and periodic service interruptions due to birds or bad
weather),
> or (b) a periodic/on-demand point-to-point serial connection via the
telephone.
>
> Of the two, a PPP telephone connection to your friend is probably the
best bet.
>
> On Tue, 13 Jul 1999 15:07:35 +0200, "Mlaas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >HI !
> >My name is Sasha Tslav
> >
> >I want to make a network with my friend ,
> >my friend live 3 km from me .
> >
> >What must I do ?
> >
> >Please help me !!!
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >Sasha Tslav
> >
> >P.S, We want to make a network with Linux !
> >
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >
>
> Lew Pitcher
> System Consultant, Integration Solutions Architecture
> Toronto Dominion Bank
>
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> (Opinions expressed are my own, not my employer's.)
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "William R. Mattil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Redirecting to cgi's with POST
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 08:26:02 -0500
Joshua Sarro wrote:
> I couldn't find an apache newsgroup (pretty surprising to me) so I am posting
> my apache question here:
searching on www.dejanews.com for the keyword "apache" would have revealed:
comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix
which covers all web servers. But since apache has a large market share most of
the traffic in this newsgroup is apache specific.
>
>
> I am trying to create a centralized cgi machine to service a lab which I work
> in. It seems, however, when I try set up the servers in the lab to redirect
> cgi requests to the cgi machine a problem occurs. The problem is that cgi
> data sent by the POST method is not being sent through the redirect. I am
> redirecting using apache's Redirect directive. Is there a different directive
> to get around this problem, or any kind of fix? Please email me any insight
> you may to fixing this problem. Thanks.
>
> -mthed "There's a madness to my method."
Hope this helps
Regards
Bill
--
William R. Mattil | Fred Astaire wasn't so great.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Ginger had to do it all backwards
(972) 399-4106 | and... in high heels.
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: /etc/ppp/peers/... permission denied (?)
Date: 13 Jul 1999 08:19:32 -0500
Michael Steffens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: The ISP doesn't authenticate itself, actually. If I understand
: correctly, this is the reason I need the noauth option for. Otherwise
: pppd would require the ISP's authentification. According to pppd's docu-
: mentation noauth is a privileged option and must be placed by root into
: either /etc/ppp/options or a file in /etc/ppp/peers. Furthermore it
: discourages putting it into /etc/ppp/options.
: Have I got something wrong?
Yep. Just don't use either auth or noauth and pppd will do the
right thing. Noauth is used to restrict the ability of regular users
to select certain options, e.g. which ttySx to use, which chat script
to use. If your box is in a hostle environment then it can be useful,
otherwise it's not needed. If you man pager allows it, search the man
pages for noauth and see just what it affects.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Microsoft is a great marketing organization.
* It _has_ to be */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rod Smith)
Subject: Re: 100 Base-T & 32bit 33MHz PCI
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 14:35:22 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Posted and mailed]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jim Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been considering upgrading my home network to 100 Base-T, given how
>
> cheap the required hardware has become. I thought I might be able to get
>
> close to 10 MByte/s on file transfers between my boxes, but I wasn't
> sure. Well, it seems that this is WAY too optimistic. I just read an
> article in Network World (July 5 issue) where fast vs gigabit ethernet
> throughput was compared. Gigabit aside, the throughput for fast ethernet
>
> between PCs in ideal conditions was ~20Mbit/s! (BTW, gigabit was
> ~25Mbit/s) The author's (Jeffrey Fritz) conclusion: OS handling of the
> IP and TCP layer checksums causes so much overhead that the CPU can't
> process the packets fast enough.
What OSes? I've got a three-computer network running assorted
combinations of Linux, OS/2, MacOS, Windows 98, and Windows NT. I've not
done all possible comparisons, but I typically get between 10 and 30Mbps
on network transfers, depending upon the protocols I use and what OSes
are involved. This is with 100base-T through a hub, on transfers of a
single large file. I don't recall seeing my CPU useage go up a whole lot
in these tests, though I suppose this could still be causing a sort of
"micro-bottleneck" that doesn't turn up in total CPU use.
--
Rod Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.channel1.com/users/rodsmith
NOTE: Remove the "uce" word from my address to mail me
Author of _Special Edition Using WordPerfect for Linux_, from Que
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (max)
Subject: Re: Samba--the basics
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 15:56:03 +0200
Hi,
> JUst happen to have a couple of URLs handy <G>
> This site has a step by step howto for complete setup of samba. steps
> for both linux and the win machine. (and they really work <G>)
> http://www.sfu.ca/~yzhang/linux/samba/index.html
> and this one as well
> http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai/samba.html
>
> These sites singly or in combination are nearly guaranteed to get you
> networked.
ALMOST is the keyword here...
I end up with:
[1999/07/13 15:46:11, 0] locking/shmem.c:smb_shm_open(930)
ERROR smb_shm_open : mmap failed with code Invalid argument
[1999/07/13 15:46:11, 0] locking/locking.c:locking_init(169)
ERROR: Failed to initialise share modes!
heh.
Must be me.
Manfred
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TrueType fonts server ???
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 13:51:16 GMT
Hi all,
I'm interested to setting up the xfstt server. Would you kindly let me
know from where did you get it and how to go about. What are the
pitfalls that I need to avoid. I had failed on xfce and steps suggested
from http://www.nexuscomputing.com on setting up truetype fonts server.
Appreciate any pointers, suggestions and comments.
LInux - too much to handle alone
Rgds
Nixien.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Monte Phillips)
Subject: Re: windows 98 can't see Linux machine using Samba
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 13:13:44 GMT
Mark,
My experience has been that when samba/network gets tangled to a
certain point, start over. Make a clean slate and install the MINIMUM
smb.conf and resolve.conf, hosts etc. Once that mini,um network is
running, then and ONLY then do you start tweaking. Further you tweak
one thing at a time, you start changing multiple aspects and even the
gurus get lost. On the helpful side <G> try the following sites,
compare what you have in your files to their models, I guarantee that
their models work, at least on the machines I have set up.
This site has a step by step howto for complete setup of samba. steps
for both linux and the win machine. (and they really work <G>)
http://www.sfu.ca/~yzhang/linux/samba/index.html
and this one as well
http://home.talkcity.com/MigrationPath/maguai/samba.html
These sites singly or in combination are nearly guaranteed to get you
networked.
>Mark Post wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Jul 1999 19:58:32 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dale Walker) wrote:
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problems with DE500-BA NIC and 100Mb full duplex
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 13:11:41 GMT
Greetings,
I've been reading the various posting on similar issues, and I suspect
that I'm simply hosed, but I figured I'd grovel for suggestions anyway,
just in case.
I have a network of 3 computers, one each running NT4sp3, Win98, and
RedHat Linux 6.0. All boxes have DEC DE500-BA NICs. There is a 100Mb
full-duplex switch (not a hub) connecting them.
The Windoze boxes can talk to each other at around 7MB/sec. Either can
send TO the Linux box at around 2MB/sec. Either can receive FROM the
Linux box at only 50Kb/sec.
At someone's suggestion, I added "options=5" to the tulip line in
modules.conf, to force full-duplex operation. Data to/from the Linux
box now moves at about 2MB/sec in both directions, but when receiving
from the Linux box, the "collision" light on the switch is on all the
time. Here's what ifconfig had to say:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:2B:C3:EA:91
inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:58185 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:108340 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:20180 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:10 Base address:0xfc80
I'm not sure what version of the tulip driver I'm using. It's whatever
shipped with RH6.0, and if the revision dates are any indication, it
should be at least v.90.
So, my questions are:
Can I alter the setup and/or the driver to get this card working
happily at 100Mb in full-duplex?
If not, how to I get it all down to half-duplex, and will that give me
decent throughput?
If I am well and truly hosed, can someone recommend a replacement NIC
for the Linux box that CAN run 100Mb in full-duplex?
Profuse thanks in advance,
Brian Baker.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob)
Subject: Re: Subnet
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 13:37:48 GMT
James - this topic interests me as well - however,
your explaination confused me - see below:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Knott) wrote:
>In article <3783f6e9.347832143@news>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>Afternoon folks,
>
>Your clock's wrong. I,ve got 11:16 AM here. ;-)
>
>>
>>I have a class C subnet that I am in the process of subnetting.
>>This is what I am trying to achieve:
>>
>>209.53.151.255 to 209.53.151.239
>>16 addresses; subnet mask = 255.255.255.240
>
>The first address will be 209.53.239.240, not 209.53.239.239. Also,
>you'll 14 usable addresses. Address 209.53.239.240 is the "network"
>and 209.53.239.255 is the broadcast.
>
>The logical AND of the subnet mask and IP address always shows the
>lowest address in the range. The rightmost block of "0" bits in the
>mask determine the number available addresses. The lowest is
>considered the network and the highest is the broadcast. Neither is
>usable by a host or router.
>
>
>>209.53.151.238 to 209.53.151.110
>>128 addresses; subnet mask 255.255.255.128
>
>With that mask, your allowable range is 209.53.239.0 to
>209.53.239.127 or 209.53.239.128 - 209.53.239.255
shouldn't the 3rd octet be 151 - NOT 239?
if this IS correct, could you:
1) explain
2) point me toward subnet'g docs!
tia - bg
________________________________________________
Definition of Windows 95:
A 32 bit upgrade to 16 bit extensions for an 8 bit operating system
designed to run on a 4 bit processor by a 2 bit company that
doesn't like 1 bit of competition.
>>
>>209.53.151.109 to 209.53.151.45
>>64 addresses; subnet mask 255.255.255.192
>
>Allowable range 209.53.239.0 - 209.53.239.63 or 209.53.239.64 -
>209.53.239.127
>
>>
>>209.53.151.44 to 209.53.151.28
>>16 addresses; subnet mask 255.255.255.240
>
>Pick 209.53.239.16 209.53.239.31 or 209.53.239.32 -209.53.239.47
>>
>>Then of course into plays comes what broadcast addresses to use.
>>
>>The math I have gone over seems to dictate that this is possible. On
>>the other hand, my provider would prefer:
>>
>>16
>>32
>>32
>>32
>>64
>>
>>Personally I really don;t want to have to do it that way. If there are
>>any subnet gurus out there I'd love to hear from you, and see if I am
>>on the right path here.
>
>
>I think you'd better review your subnetting lessons. It would appear
>you are trying to creating a range of address based on some arbitrary
>low end. You may be able to do what you want, with a lot of
>"creative" masking, but if so, it would be more trouble than it's
>worth.
------------------------------
From: VBF-Ratingen GmbH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: no ptys available
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 16:34:20 +0200
Svend E.T Eriksen schrieb:
>
> This is the message I get on my brand new RH6.0 installation when
> I try to open a xterm or do a rlogin. How do I find out what is taking
> all my ptys?
>
> Svend!
I don't know how to do this, but a simple workaround: simply increase
the number of ptys (by compiling a new kernel)... somewhere in make
xconfig or whatever it can be changed... :-)
Hope this helps :)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba & win98 long file names
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 14:25:14 GMT
I set the "protocal" because if I don't I can't see the win98 share
from the linux box and the HOWTO said to set it to LANMAN2.
I changed the last line to "mangle case = no" and that seem to fix the
problem. From reading the HOWTO you would think you need to set it to
yes but, I guess not.
Thank you for the help!
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have absolutely no problem with this and can only imagine that the
> last 2 lines in your [global] are the problem. Why do you set your
> 'protocol'?
>
> JimA wrote:
>
> > What do I set in the smb.conf to get win98 to see log file name
> > format on the samba sever?
> >
> > In don't see it in the HOWTOs. Right now this is how I have
> > smb.conf set;
> >
> > # Samba config file created using SWAT
> > # from win98 (10.8.11.7)
> > # Date: 1999/07/08 19:55:36
> >
> > # Global parameters
> > workgroup = workgroup
> > server string = Samba
> > interfaces = 10.8.11.1 127.0.0.1
> > security = SHARE
> > encrypt passwords = Yes
> > use rhosts = Yes
> > protocol = LANMAN2
> > printcap name = /etc/printcap
> > os level = 70
> > preferred master = Yes
> > domain master = Yes
> > wins server = 10.8.11.1
> > guest account = samba
> > force create mode = 0700
> > hosts allow = 10.0.0.0 127.0.0.0
> > hosts deny = none
> > short preserve case = No
> > mangle case = Yes
> >
> > [Workgroup]
> > path = /group
> > read only = No
> > guest ok = Yes
> >
> > [printers]
> > comment = All Printers
> > path = /tmp
> > read only = No
> > create mask = 0700
> > guest ok = Yes
> > print ok = Yes
>
> --
> Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect, especially on
my
> http://www.germanynet.de/teilnehmer/101/69082/samba.html
> Simple Samba Solutions web page. ICQ
1722461
> __________________________________________________________
> | Fight Spam! Join EuroCAUCE: http://www.euro.cauce.org/ |
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Dino7" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.os.ms-windows.networking
Subject: Re: Network in a box?
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 13:32:36 GMT
I am using SOHO, and I am happy as a clam!
Dino7
Vikas Agnihotri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7me9s1$6j8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Does anyone have any experiences, good or bad, with the Network-in-a-box
> products out there in the market?
>
> For 100Mbps, here are the prices at a local CompUSA:
>
> SMC: $130
> SohoWare: $80 !!!
> LinkSys: $120
>
> All these include a 4 (+1 uplink) 100Mbps hub, 2 100Mbps PCI cards, 2
> Cat5 cables, manual, drivers, etc.
>
> Is the price right? Any other products? Which is the best? Does it make
> more sense to buy each component piece-meal?
>
> Do these network cards work with Linux? Would the PnP be a problem for
> Linux? Are they _real_ Ethernet cards or just some winmodem-like junk?
>
> Thanks,
> Vikas
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Christoph Passon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NFS mount with DHCP client
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 14:40:53 +0200
==============BB7C7E5906514CBF0AB331C7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In addition to my question:
In the /var/log/messages file on the server the mountd complains
mountd[452]: mount request from unknown host 1.2.3.4 (replaced
real address with 1.2.3.4 here :)
So to be more specific, how can mountd be told to give permission to
unknown hosts?
Bye,
Chris
--
.--.
|o_o |
Christoph Passon__________________________________________ |:_/ |
realTech GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED] // \ \
z.Zt SAP AG [EMAIL PROTECTED] (| | )
Linux LAB /'\_ _/`\
+49 (6227) 7-62052 \___)=(___/
==============BB7C7E5906514CBF0AB331C7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
In addition to my question:
<p>In the /var/log/messages file on the server the mountd complains
<p> mountd[452]: mount request from unknown host
1.2.3.4
(replaced real address with 1.2.3.4 here :)
<p>So to be more specific, how can mountd be told to give permission to
<br>unknown hosts?
<br>
<p>Bye,
<p>Chris
<br>
<br>
<pre>--
.--.
|o_o |
Christoph Passon__________________________________________ |:_/ |
realTech
GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] // \ \
z.Zt SAP
AG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (| | )
Linux
LAB
/'\_ _/`\
+49 (6227)
+7-62052
+ \___)=(___/</pre>
</html>
==============BB7C7E5906514CBF0AB331C7==
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ReplyTo_PlatoAtAccesswestDotCom)
Subject: LET BORLAND KNOW LINUX *IS* A RIPE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPEMENT TOOLS MARKET!!!
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 14:09:35 GMT
This company has over the years turned out some of the best
DOS/Windows based developement tools since the early 80s. Like many
other great tools developers they have been beaten down by Microsoft
in the Win32 arena. Let them know that Linux *IS* a great platform to
sell serious professional software development tools for.
These guys have the resources to turn out great tools in a much
shorter time period than Open Source programmers can, plus the
commercial support corporations require. This lack of these tools is
hurting Linux with professional UNIX (all flavors free and commercial)
developers who are accustomed to hard core professional development
tools.
http://www.borland.com/linux/
------------------------------
From: VBF-Ratingen GmbH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba-PC can't be seen
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 16:23:00 +0200
I can access the WIndows-PCs, but in the net-neighbourhood under Win the
Samba-PC isn't there.. :-(
Any Ideas???
My /etc/smb.conf:
==============snip====================
[global]
workgroup = vt
security = user
domain master = yes
domain logons = yes
encrypt passwords=yes
interfaces = 192.168.1.1/255.255.255.0
log file = /var/log/samba-log
lock directory = /var/lock/samba
[usr]
comment = /usr auf Linux-Server
path=/usr
public=yes
==============snap====================
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
