Linux-Networking Digest #901, Volume #11 Thu, 15 Jul 99 06:13:34 EDT
Contents:
Re: How to use smbmount? (Monte Phillips)
RH6.0 NFS trouble ("Angelo Hulshout")
ppp errors ( ioctl(PPPIOCGUNIT): ) after switching to Suse 6.1 (Frank Bade)
Re: FTP server behined ipmasq gateway? (Monte Phillips)
RH 6.0, and WebSphere installation problems ("KOKE")
Some problem with 3Com 3c509b & RedHat 6.0 - Any Help appreciated !
("Mimmo.Principe")
Re: Little Bit of Help with NE2000 Problem ... ("Ben Price")
eth0 -device not found (Vikram Krishna Das)
Re: Little Bit of Help with NE2000 Problem ... (Norman Elliott)
Problem: Linux in a NT network ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
routing (Min Hu)
Really disappointed (can't set up DNS wildcards) (scientiaXXX)
Linux PPP server problems (The Sweep)
Re: Startup doesn't load 2 Ethernet Cards properly (Eric LEMAITRE)
Re: ypserv: too many children (Johannes Nix)
Re: Internet (T-Online) and TCP/IP ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Win95->Linux via Parallel Cable ("MuDJuNkY")
how to use two networkcards of same type? (Marcus Gruendler)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Monte Phillips)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: How to use smbmount?
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 13:10:07 GMT
Steven Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I can use smbclient to connect share directories on our nt server. But
>the smbmount command did not work. I use the following command:
> smbmount //ntserver/myshare -U steven -c 'mount /mnt -uid 0 -gid 0'
>this command ask me input a password, after I typied it in, it returned
>me a 'No such device'. Then I used the following command parameters
>instead:
> smbmount //ntserver/myshare -U steven
Try this one
smbmount //ntserver/myshare -c 'mount /samba'
make sure the mount point exists FIRST i.e. in this case /samba
>This time, smbmount also ask me to input a password, i in turn typied it
>in again, everything looks fine, it bring me into a 'smb>' prompt, but I
>can not input any command under this prompt!
------------------------------
From: "Angelo Hulshout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RH6.0 NFS trouble
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 06:42:05 GMT
Hi there!
It's seems I am just one out of many reporting trouble with RH6.0 NFS.
Here's what happens:
We run a small Linux network within a larger network. DNS is serviced by
Solaris and HP servers, a RH6.0 Linux server takes care of NIS and home-dirs
for Linux users. NIS works fine, users can login etc., but the following
problems arise:
1. Server exports /home and /utils, which are NFS mounted by clients. Some
home dirs cannot be cd-ed to, others cannot be read by ls and other
tools.
/utils cannot be read by ls either. The problem is not in the exports
file
or in the access rights, we checked that all directories have same
access rights and all users are in the same groups.
2. When starting X with KDE, first time KDE users get a message 'creating
directory ~/Desktop' which remains on screen forever and hangs KDE. This
failure results in a lot of 'NFS server not responding messages on the
console, followed by 'NFS server OK' once kwm is killed
Anyone else having similar problems and has found a solution please let me
know. If the solution is knfsd 1.4.3 and a klockd patch, please tell me
where
to find these (ftp://ftp.redhat)
Thnx in advance,
Angelo Hulshout
------------------------------
From: Frank Bade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ppp errors ( ioctl(PPPIOCGUNIT): ) after switching to Suse 6.1
Date: 15 Jul 1999 09:40:02 +0200
After I have upgraded my PC from
Suse 6.0 ( kernel 2.0.36, ppp ? )
to
Suse 6.1 ( kernel 2.2.x, ppp 2.3.3 )
the pppd daemon exits with the error
'ioctl(PPPIOCGUNIT):Operation not permitted'
always, after the chat script has established the connection.
I tried several tools to establish the connection ( wvdial, xisp,
script-startup ) but they all behave he same.
Any idea's ?
Frank
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Monte Phillips)
Subject: Re: FTP server behined ipmasq gateway?
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 04:37:34 GMT
one thing you'll need to do is
insmod ip_masq_ftp
that will handle the ftp ports masquerading problem.
>> Michael wrote:
>> > I have a small dilema, and any suggestions would be appreciated.
>> > I have a small network of three machines. 1 Linux, RH 6, ipmasq. 1. NT
>> > Server 4, SP4/win98 and 1 win95 box.
>> > The linux machine has the modem, and I connect it to the Internet with a
>> > modem, the other 2 machines use the net via this using ipmasq.
>> > My problem is this, I want to be able to run a ftp server on the NT box, and
>> > connect to it over the Internet from work.
>> > How can I do this? The linux box gets in the way.
------------------------------
From: "KOKE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: RH 6.0, and WebSphere installation problems
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 04:14:20 -0400
Trying to install WebSphere Application Server (IBM) on a RH 6.0 machine.
Apache 1.3.6 with IBM HTTP over top - installed.
The install instructions for WAS say the following:
1. Set JAVA_HOME environment variable to root directory of JDK
2. Set PATH=JAVA_HOME/bin
3. Set THREADS_FLAG=native
After doing this and checking to see java will run successfully
(java -fullversion) I get the response from the install.sh script that says
set JAVA_HOME env. variable and run install.sh again.
I have tried the IBM jdk 1.1.6 (recommended in deja news group for
WebSphere) and also Blackdown.org jdk 1.1.7_v3 recommended in README file
for WAS. Same result with each JDK.
Anyone with experience with WebSphere yor help is appreciated. Any jdk
install experience also.....
I need to get the WAS running to serve servlets and JSP's.
Always in your debt (smile) Mike Kokinda
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Mimmo.Principe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Some problem with 3Com 3c509b & RedHat 6.0 - Any Help appreciated !
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 08:46:03 +0200
My machine is running in Linux 2.2.5-15 RedHat 6.0.
After starting system , everythings seems [OK] , but when i try to send
somethings via Eth0 (3c509), like ping command i receive the message:
"Transmit timed out, Tx_status 00 status 2000 TX FIFO room 1456".
I try to set off the PnP (Plag and pray) bit with dos utility of 3Com ( ref.
How-to-Ethernet-5 Vendor/Manufacturer ...3Com...)and restart system but
dont'work.
The network (hardware resource) is tested and is O.K. No problems occurred
in Win98 with same situation.
Any help appreciated,
===========================================
Mimmo Principe - Rome
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===========================================
------------------------------
From: "Ben Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.slackware
Subject: Re: Little Bit of Help with NE2000 Problem ...
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 08:10:39 +0100
Isn't zlilo or bzlilo supposed to make the kernel image, copy it somewhere
and install it in lilo for you? What's the point of it over bzImage if it
doens't?
Bp.
Norman Elliott wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Desmond Coughlan wrote:
>
>> I have a slight configuration problem trying to get my NE2000 card
>> recognised undezrt Slackware 4.0.
>>
>> I run KDE (bloody lovely window manager, by the way), and get into
>> /usr/src/linux-2.2.6/
>>
>> I run make xconfig; just like I did with my old 486. I enable network
>> devices, and specify an ISA NE2000-compatible card.
>>
>> I then save and exit, and it tells me to run 'make bzlilo'. I do, and
>> then reboot, but get the message: eth0 no such device.
>>
>> What is all this 'bzlilo' stuff, anyway? I used to run 'make dep',
>> 'make clean', and then 'make zlilo', and all was hunky-dory. I tried
>> that as well, and it didn't work.
>>
>> Has something been changed with regard to NIC recognition? Is this a
>> known problem? Am I missing something? Am I stupid?
>>
>> Answers on a postcard to ...
>>
>> :-)
>> --
>> Desmond Coughlan |Restez Zen ... Linux peut le faire
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [www site under construction]
>>
>
>Unless I am mistaken you are not running the new kernel..
>The kernel the system uses is one in lilo.conf which is a file in the
>system root .
>What I usually do is make my new kernel, copy it with some unique name to
>the root,
>edit lilo.conf so it becomes an option at boot up then run lilo to update
>the master boot record.
>then rebbot and choose that kernel. Then, if I have made a mistake I can
>at least reboot and
>choose my original kernel and start again.
>I believe the zlilo you created is in /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot
>hope this helps,
>norm
>
------------------------------
From: Vikram Krishna Das <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,redhat.networking.general
Subject: eth0 -device not found
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 08:32:42 GMT
My Red Hat linux 6 was working ok. I was configuring Samba & it was working fine. When
I rebooted - the network card was no longer working. I tried ifconfig and it says
eth0:error fetching interface information: Device not found
I saw that at bootup etho was coming up. Using KDE Information - it shows that there
is a PCI ethernet card with IRQ 10 and I/O 0xe400 [0xe401]
I am puzzled & new to linux.
Please help!!!
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: Norman Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.slackware
Subject: Re: Little Bit of Help with NE2000 Problem ...
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 20:28:28 +0000
Desmond Coughlan wrote:
> I have a slight configuration problem trying to get my NE2000 card
> recognised undezrt Slackware 4.0.
>
> I run KDE (bloody lovely window manager, by the way), and get into
> /usr/src/linux-2.2.6/
>
> I run make xconfig; just like I did with my old 486. I enable network
> devices, and specify an ISA NE2000-compatible card.
>
> I then save and exit, and it tells me to run 'make bzlilo'. I do, and
> then reboot, but get the message: eth0 no such device.
>
> What is all this 'bzlilo' stuff, anyway? I used to run 'make dep',
> 'make clean', and then 'make zlilo', and all was hunky-dory. I tried
> that as well, and it didn't work.
>
> Has something been changed with regard to NIC recognition? Is this a
> known problem? Am I missing something? Am I stupid?
>
> Answers on a postcard to ...
>
> :-)
> --
> Desmond Coughlan |Restez Zen ... Linux peut le faire
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [www site under construction]
>
Unless I am mistaken you are not running the new kernel..
The kernel the system uses is one in lilo.conf which is a file in the
system root .
What I usually do is make my new kernel, copy it with some unique name to
the root,
edit lilo.conf so it becomes an option at boot up then run lilo to update
the master boot record.
then rebbot and choose that kernel. Then, if I have made a mistake I can
at least reboot and
choose my original kernel and start again.
I believe the zlilo you created is in /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot
hope this helps,
norm
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problem: Linux in a NT network
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 08:20:47 GMT
Sorry for reposting but I got no answers in the first post
(was: HELP: dhcpcd - linux in a NT network).
I'm trying to connect a Linux box (Slackware 4.0, kernel 2.2.6)
into an existing NT network. In this network, all other computers
are Win98 and grab their IP addresses (as well as other net info)
from a DHCP server in the NT box. Nt is running SP5 and all clients
communicate with the outside world via a Proxy Server (SOCKS)
I've setup dhcpcd into my linux box and it successfully retrieved
an IP and the rest. The dhcpcd-eth0.info looks like this:
IPADDR=xxx.xxx.xxx.180
NETMASK=255.255.255.128
NETWORK=xxx.xxx.xxx.128
BROADCAST=xxx.xxx.xxx.255
GATEWAY=xxx.xxx.xxx.254
HOSTNAME=
DOMAIN=
DNS=xxx.yyy.yyy.yyy
DHCPSIADDR=xxx.xxx.xxx.254
DHCPSHADDR=00:65:07:5D:A2:D3
DHCPSNAME=
LEASETIME=864000
RENEWALTIME=432000
REBINDTIME=756000
Note that the DNS IP is in a different domain
Only the first number of the address is the same
(but it is the same IP in any other Win98 clients,
so I presume, it is correct).
The routing table seems fine:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window Irtt Iface
xxx.xxx.xxx.128 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.128 U 0 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 xxx.xxx.xxx.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
the same for ifconfig :
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:5A:DB:F6:AE
inet addr:xxx.xxx.xxx.180 Bcast:xxx.xxx.xxx.255
Mask:255.255.255.128
UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:26 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:40 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:10
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 Interrupt:5 Base address:0xe400
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
The resolver.conf goes like this
domain
nameserver xxx.yyy.yyy.yyy
Now the problems:
a) My machine can't ping other machines in the LAN by their names
but it can ping them by IP addresses. The others can ping the
linux box by its IP address also...
b) I can't go trough the NT server with telnet and ftp. However
I can access an ftp area in the NT box with ftp.
c) nslookup doesn't work, which means that I'm not reaching the DNS
which, by the way, is outside the LAN...
d) Win98 boxes can telnet into my Linux box using its IP but they take
a long time to connect. Some clients even give up before connecting
(like Win98 telnet)
e) Netscape works fine, if I configure it to use the NT proxy.
The problem is that dhcpcd is not very well documented... i've
tried to use
/sbin/dhcpcd -r -h delphis
in rc.inet1. I guess the -h option is to tell to the name of the host
to the DHCP server... but the dhcpcd-eth0.info has an empty HOSTNAME
(as well as an empty NETWORK). I don't know what to do...
1) Should I recompile the kernel using SMB support? Do I need to install
samba, even though I don't plan to share files or printers. The only
thing I want is to build a local webserver to permit people to
browse databases...
2) dhcpcd rewrites the resolver.conf and saves the older one
into resolver.conf.sv in /etc. Should I make a link to a
resolver.conf in /etc/dhcpc?
3) Should I set up manually hosts and networks? If so, how?
4) I guess the NT server is using a kind of SOCKS (Proxy)
(I was unable to speak with the manager yet) so I assume
I must get some sockyfied clients (telnet,ftp... others?)
5) Is it possible to use dhcpcd ina a system with two ether cards?
I think I've read somewhere that it was almost impossible to
setup masquerading (and a subnet) if the main ether card was
configured via dhcpcd
Thanks for any help
Antonio
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
Subject: routing
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Min Hu)
Date: 14 Jul 1999 15:37:04 -0500
I am setting up a private network in the following way.
******** ********
======* *====================* *=============
******** ********
150.1.3.1 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.10 128.110.75.10
I use static routing table to have the two linux router boxes talk each other, but I
can not have computers on the two networks 150.1.3.0 and 128.110.75.10 to talk each
other. I set up my routing table in the following way:
ifconfig eth0 150.1.3.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig eth1 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
route add -net 150.1.3.0
route add -net 192.168.1.1
route add -net 128.110.75.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.1.10 metric 3
ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig eth1 128.110.75.10 netmask 255.255.255.0
route add -net 192.168.1.0
route add -net 128.110.75.0
route add -net 150.1.3.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.1.1 metric 3
when I ping 150.1.3.1 from 128.110.75.10 or ping 128.110.75.10 from 150.1.3.1, both
work. However, when ping 150.1.3.20 from 128.110.75.80 or the other way, none of them
work.
Anybody can enlight my how to solve the problem? Do I need to use gated program to do
it? Thanks very much.
MIN HU
--
HU MIN, University of Toronto, Dept. of Physics
Toronto, Ontario, Canada. M5S 1A7
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: scientiaXXX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Really disappointed (can't set up DNS wildcards)
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 21:18:49 -0700
Really disappointed (can't set up DNS wildcards)
Hello
(I am writing to this NG because in DejaNews I saw that here
the keywords DNS wildcards occur many times; I did not get
solutions from other NGs)
I am really disappointed because I have been trying to set up
wildcard subdomains for the last 3 weeks:
2 (two) Providers have not been able to set them up for me.
Now I tried to set up DNS informations at "Public" (free) DNS
at granitecanyon.com , and I was able to set up correctly my domain
"in.cx" (it is already working, after a few hours!),
although one month ago I did not even know what a DNS was!
However, I am not able to set up WILDCARDS.
I would like ALL the domains *.in.cx to go to my IP.
Here are the attempts I made to set up wildcards and the errors I got
at granitecanyon.com :
My domain name is "in.cx" and my IP is 216.65.80.171 .
FIRST ATTEMPT, wildcards with CNAME:
==============
in.cx. IN A 216.65.80.171
www.in.cx. IN CNAME in.cx.
* IN CNAME in.cx.
Error:
nslint: illegal hostname "*.in.cx." (starts with non-alpha/numeric)
=================
Other attempt
in.cx. IN A 216.65.80.171
www.in.cx. IN CNAME in.cx.
* IN A 216.65.80.171
Errors:
nslint: illegal hostname "*.in.cx." (starts with non-alpha/numeric)
nslint: 216.65.80.171 in use by in.cx. and *.in.cx.
=================
The same happens substituting the last line with a similar line
*.in.cx. IN A 216.65.80.171
=================
So I tried to put only the wildcard line!
*.in.cx. IN A 216.65.80.171
nslint: illegal hostname "*.in.cx." (starts with non-alpha/numeric)
=================
Similar:
* IN A 216.65.80.171
nslint: illegal hostname "*.in.cx." (starts with non-alpha/numeric)
================
Finally, I set up simply the domain in.cx without wildcards
and it works perfectly:
in.cx. IN A 216.65.80.171
www.in.cx. IN CNAME in.cx.
However, it is useless for me without wildcards.
=========================
It seems that wildcards are not recognized!
It wants an alpha-numeric character.
Maybe it is impossible to set up DNS wildcards here.
However I hope that someone can help me.
I also tried to ask for help at granitecanyon.com, but I received
an automatic answer telling me to go to certain news or web pages
that I can't find!
news://news.granitecanyon.com/soa.help
Newsgroup: soa.help (??!)
Thanks for any help
Fabrizio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Sweep)
Subject: Linux PPP server problems
Date: 15 Jul 1999 09:00:28 GMT
Reply-To: nobody
I have setup a PPP server from the documentation in the
ppp-howto and the serial-howto. It works fine when I dial-in
using my linux PC.
When I try to dial in using Windows NT,
it doesn't work. The error I get from dial up networking is
that the modem is echoing back characters of that the server
is attempting a TTY login before connecting. It says to
configure this entry for a post-connected Terminal. Error 737.
If I open up a terminal screen and login by hand, the PPP connection
works to the NT box. The problem I think is the Linux PPP server
is asking the username and password and the NT machine gets
confused.
Has anyone setup a linux box to act like a PPP server and
gotten it to work with Windows? Thanks for any help.
Sweep
=============================================================
Remove you know what for my Email address.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Eric LEMAITRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Startup doesn't load 2 Ethernet Cards properly
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 01:09:41 +0200
Philip Allen Johnson a �crit :
> I have two identical machines. They both have a Intel chip on the
> motherboard (eepro100 at I/O 0xe800 and irq 10) and a Linksys ISA card
> (ne at I/O 0x240 IRQ 3). They both have the same BIOS settings. They
> both have the same version and drivers of Redhat (Linux V2.0.34). One of
> the machines starts up fine, starts both ethernet ports and operates as
> a firewall machine. The ifconfig for that machine shows:
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:60:EF:20:A2:3B
> inet addr:10.48.36.1 Bcast:10.48.36.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:1813771 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> TX packets:2190032 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> Interrupt:10 Base address:0xe800
Standard for a PNP & PCI based NIC, such as 3COM by exemple.
> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:05:6D:A5:E4
> inet addr:24.1.72.94 Bcast:24.1.79.255 Mask:255.255.240.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:32926459 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> TX packets:1459995 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> Interrupt:3 Base address:0x240
Standard for a non PNP based NIC, such as cheap ISA NE2000 compatible (DLink DE-220
by exemple).
> The second machine will not start either eth0 or eth1.
>
> Delaying eth0 initialization
> modprobe: can't locate module eth1
> Delaying eth1 initialization
You should disable PNP for your wanted non PNP card, launch a DOS Setup (on its
floppy drivers) set EPROM to wanted figures (I/O 0x240 IRQ 3 by exemple), and check
your " /etc/conf.modules ", all trouble is in there.
Bye !
--
Responsable de formation pour les fili�res Internet et Linux
------------------------------
From: Johannes Nix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ypserv: too many children
Date: 15 Jul 1999 11:22:45 +0200
Thorsten Kukuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I think you have enabled DNS lookups for hosts which does not exist
> in the NIS hosts map.
yep, ypserv runs with --dns option but this is needed. Would it help
to upgrade RAM from 32MB to 64MB ?
top says:
11:19am up 8 days, 19:11, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
33 processes: 32 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: 1.5% user, 2.6% system, 0.0% nice, 95.9% idle
Mem: 30584K av, 28740K used, 1844K free, 4032K shrd, 868K buff
Swap: 269544K av, 4860K used, 264684K free 11736K cached
22356 root 0 0 12696 11M 256 S 0 0.0 37.5 0:34 ypserv
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT LIB %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
22356 root 0 0 12696 11M 256 S 0 0.0 37.5 0:34 ypserv
Johannes Nix
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Internet (T-Online) and TCP/IP
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 08:46:52 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
VBF-Ratingen GmbH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HI there!!!
>
> I have a WIn9x-net with one linux server (Samba)... For using Samba, i
> gave the WIn9x-PCs IP-Adresses (192.168.1.1 - 192.168.3.1). This works
> :)
> But, i have a question: one PC in the net has got a access to the
> Internet, using T-Online... If I set a _fix_ IP-Number, will T-Online
go
> on working properly???
>
> Thanks!!
> Rainer.
>
Guten Tag, Rainer,
T-Online should use its own TCP/IP stack which is using the dialer
only. The interface is proprietary, meaning that everything is built-in
to the T-Online interface much like the old interface for Compuserve
used to be. It was designed for machines and Operating Systems that did
not have native TCP support (re: Win3) This should not affect the
machine that has the T-Online software.
Remember yesterday.
Live for today.
Dream of tomorrow.
Everything else is Bullshit.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "MuDJuNkY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Win95->Linux via Parallel Cable
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 05:45:45 -0400
I'm a newbie linux user wanting to learn more...but I cannot run linux until
I've found a way to setup the same kind of network as I have currently with
my two windows machines.
I'd like to setup linux as a network server and internet gateway.
I'd like to be able to access my linux box with my win95 box via Direct
Cable Connection (parallel cable). And I'd like to be able to still use the
win95 box for http/ftp/telnet/socks/and DNS access through the linux box to
the internet.
If I could please get some intstructions on how to do this, it would be
greatly appreciated. My roommate gets upset with me everytime I run linux
and he can't access the internet. AND I'm sick of WINDOWS!
So far I can at least access the internet from linux, so all I need is the
network setup.
Thanks
------------------------------
From: Marcus Gruendler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: how to use two networkcards of same type?
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 11:56:40 +0200
Hi,
I have a problem. I want to set up a router in order to
connect my LAN to the internet. Here arises a problem. I
need two networkcards of course. If I use two cards of the
same type Linux doesn't rcognize the second card because the
module "smc-ultra.o" is already loaded.
How do i have to configure Linux in order to use two
networkcards of the same type (SMC-Ultra) with a different
IRQ/IO setup?
Everything works fine if i use two different networkcards.
Any help would be appreciated :-)
Bye, Marcus
--
Marcus Gruendler
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:
http://www-users.rwth-aachen.de/Marcus.Gruendler/index.html
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
