Linux-Networking Digest #996, Volume #11 Sat, 24 Jul 99 20:13:57 EDT
Contents:
Re: netscape (Michel Catudal)
Re: Unique Cable Modem situation (Ed Wilts)
Re: Linux NFS: 'Permission denied' error (Allen Wong)
Re: Cannot use IPX over PPP between Linux hosts (Malware)
Re: tcsetattr: invalid argument (Clifford Kite)
Re: Help needed connecting to Non-MS-CHAP NT RAS with PPP - E=691 (Keith Brown)
Re: e-mail virtual servers ("Tom Young")
Re: PPP connection doesn't work (Clifford Kite)
Netscape Doesn't Work (Ted Lee)
Cnet pro120c ether card with tulip driver (Abdullah =?iso-8859-9?Q?Ramazano=F0lu?=)
Re: Losing interest (Rod Roark)
Re: Samba and Recycle Bin on NT 4.0 (Mark Post)
Re: Netscape Doesn't Work (Allen Wong)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Michel Catudal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: netscape
Date: 24 Jul 1999 17:18:03 -0500
Randal Powell wrote:
>
> Michel Catudal wrote:
> >
> > James Stafford wrote:
> > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > try this site
> > > >
> > > > http://www.bluemountainarts.com
> > > >
> > > > choose the birthday cards
> > > >
> > > > then you go to the second page and choose "Happy birthday to you"
> > > >
> > > > Have fun!
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > use OS/2 for a crash proof work environment
> > > > use Linux for safe and quick internet access
> > > > use Winblows to test the latest viruses
> > > > http://www.netonecom.net/~bbcat/
> > > > We have software, food, music, news, search,
> > > > history, electronics and genealogy pages.
> > >
> > > Well, I just went there and besides complaining about not having an
> > > x-audio plug-in everything worked alright. Is this what was supposed to
> > > happen? Now, I would like to take the time for turning me on to this
> > > great card sight! I love to make my own greeting cards, and doing so is
> > > just about the only thing I have to use something other than Linux for.
> > >
> > > Again thanks a lot,
> > >
> > > jamess
> > > --
> >
> > Mine uses midi and after the midi starts I don't seem to be able
> > to stop it. But then it seems to crash as it is trying to load
> > a big font. There is potentially two problems here.
> >
> > Under RedHat 6.0 netscape 4.51 and up would make Netscape go
> > into a black hole while under SuSE it crashes Netscape. With
> > Netscape 4.5 I never got it to crash under this with RedHat 6.0
> > but it does crash sometime under SuSE if I have another netscape
> > window open. It works ok most of the time.
> >
> > --
> > use OS/2 for a crash proof work environment
> > use Linux for safe and quick internet access
> > use Winblows to test the latest viruses
> > http://www.netonecom.net/~bbcat/
> > We have software, food, music, news, search,
> > history, electronics and genealogy pages.
>
> I tried this site and had no problem at all (using Netscape 4.61 on RH
> 6.0). But then, I recently installed the most recent JDK of Java for
> Linux. Seems a lot of unexpected exits and core dumps disappeared when I
> did this.
>
Which version would that be?
doing rpm -q java I get java-1.1.7v1a-9
I use SuSE 6.1 with kernel 2.2.10
--
use OS/2 for a crash proof work environment
use Linux for safe and quick internet access
use Winblows to test the latest viruses
http://www.netonecom.net/~bbcat/
We have software, food, music, news, search,
history, electronics and genealogy pages.
------------------------------
From: Ed Wilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Unique Cable Modem situation
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 22:21:19 GMT
Jason Motylinski wrote:
>
> Greetings!
> I've been reading about people having problems with cable modems but
> I've never read about anyone having difficulties with an external
> Surfboard 1200 cable modem. When I'm offline I cannot telnet or FTP to
> my linux box. Here's my problem:
> I have a one-way (uses phone line) Surfboard 1200 external cable modem
> that connects to a NIC. The modem's IP is:192.168.100.1 . It interfaces
> with my Linux machine (192.168.100.3). Being pretty much a newbie to
> Linux I don't change much from the standard RH6.0 install. During the RH
> installation I configured the following information:
> IP: 192.168.100.3
> Gateway: 192.168.100.1
> DNS: 209.32.160.11
> domain name: computerjargon.com
> host name: ed.computerjargon.com
> DNS 2: 209.32.160.10
>
> That's all the network information I entered.When I am not online I
> cannot telnet or FTP to my linux machine. Although I can access web
> pages served by my linux machine. I use a web interface to activate the
> modem (get it to dial). I go to http://192.168.100.1. I click connect
> and the modem does it's thing. Once I am connected to the 'net on my
> Linux box I can then telnet and FTP to my box.
>
> Is anyone else in a similar situation?
This is the MediaOne service. Same thing I've got and have had running
for 2 weeks now.
Where are you trying to connect from? Are you saying that telnet and
ftp connections from inside your network are being rejected whereas http
connections are accepted?
If you're offline, then all connections from outside will be rejected.
That much should be obvious.
--
Ed Wilts
Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Allen Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux NFS: 'Permission denied' error
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 15:42:23 -0700
Robert,
Please post your "exports" file and the output of this command:
/usr/sbin/showmount -e <NFS server>
Allen
--
Linux: If you're not careful, you might actually learn something.
------------------------------
From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp,linux.redhat.ppp
Subject: Re: Cannot use IPX over PPP between Linux hosts
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 00:09:30 +0200
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============D0DE38E59113C8F26B4205DC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Jurrien,
you wrote:
> Jul 23 20:25:18 gate pppd[836]: IPX support is not present in the kernel
>
> But I've had compiled both Linux kernel with IPX support as you can see:
[...]
> enabled the option "Full internal IPX network" in include/net/ipx.h. I've
> compiled pppd 2.3.8 with the compile flag -DIPX_CHANGE.
>
> Does someone know why I get this error?
Maybe just a little bug in pppd 2.3.8. I saw appended small patch on a
site about PPtP.
Malware
==============D0DE38E59113C8F26B4205DC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; name="ppp-2.3.8-patch1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="ppp-2.3.8-patch1"
Index: sys-linux.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /data/cvs/ppp/pppd/sys-linux.c,v
retrieving revision 1.61
diff -u -r1.61 sys-linux.c
--- sys-linux.c 1999/05/14 01:09:04 1.61
+++ sys-linux.c 1999/05/14 12:43:56
@@ -2402,7 +2402,7 @@
*/
if (ipxcp_protent.enabled_flag) {
struct stat stat_buf;
- if (path_to_procfs("/net/ipx_interface")
+ if (!path_to_procfs("/net/ipx_interface")
|| lstat (route_buffer, &stat_buf) < 0) {
error("IPX support is not present in the kernel\n");
ipxcp_protent.enabled_flag = 0;
==============D0DE38E59113C8F26B4205DC==
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: tcsetattr: invalid argument
Date: 24 Jul 1999 16:52:21 -0500
Michael F. Russell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I am running Red Hat 6 and this is an error that appears in my
: /var/log/messages after I run pppd. Does anyone know what this is and how to
: fix it?
tcgetattr almost always means that there is another process besides
pppd that is contending for the modem IRQ. Some examples are (1) an
ethernet card that used the same IRQ as the modem, (2) a misconfigured
ppp script that launched pppd twice, and (3) a mingetty that somehow
had been configured for call-in.
The fix is to use another IRQ for the modem or for the device that the
other process is using.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Speak softly and carry a +6 two-handed sword. */
------------------------------
From: Keith Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.ppp,linux.dev.ppp,redhat.networking.general,alt.os.linux.mandrake,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: Help needed connecting to Non-MS-CHAP NT RAS with PPP - E=691
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 17:07:45 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==============D51DE97E8FB377BEC7353B4D
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Malcolm Ferguso wrote:
> A recent server upgrade has left me unable to connect to our NT RAS at
> work. Our Network Admin backed off the security for us so that it
> wasn't insisting on MS-CHAP 80, but I still can't connect. Can anybody
> help me?
>
> Below I've included the syslog pppd debug messages (username and
> password '*'ed out) from my attempts using CHAP and PAP. As you can
> see, the RAS initially challenges with "auth chap 80", but accepts my
> request for "auth pap". However, it does not accept my username and
> password, returning hardware error "E=691". Why? I can connect from NT
> and 95.
>
> I'm using Mandrake 6.0 (based on Red Hat 6.0???) and pppd version 2.3.7.
>
> Connection using PAP:
>
> Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS1
> sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1<asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x9332fb4c> <pcomp>
> <accomp>]
> rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x0 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth chap 80> <magic 0xbb0>
> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x0 <auth pap>]
> rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x9332fb4c> <pcomp>
> <accomp>]
> rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth pap> <magic 0xbb0> <pcomp>
> <accomp>]
> sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth pap> <magic 0xbb0> <pcomp>
> <accomp>]
> sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x1 user="********" password="********"]
> sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x2 user="********" password="********"]
> rcvd [PAP AuthNak id=0x1 "E=691"]
> Remote message: E=691
> PAP authentication failed
> rcvd [LCP TermReq id=0x2 00 00 02 b3]
> LCP terminated by peer (^@^@^BM-3)
> sent [LCP TermAck id=0x2]
> Hangup (SIGHUP)
> Modem hangup
> Connection terminated.
>
> Connection using CHAP:
>
> sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xedbb9a76> <pcomp>
> <accomp>]
> rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x0 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth chap 80> <magic 0x674d>
> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x0 <auth chap MD5>]
> rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xedbb9a76> <pcomp>
> <accomp>]
> rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth 0xc027 01 00 00 01> <magic
> 0x674d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x1 <auth chap MD5>]
> rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth 0xc123 01 00 00 01> <magic
> 0x674d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x2 <auth chap MD5>]
> rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x3 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth pap> <magic 0x674d>
> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x3 <auth chap MD5>]
> rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x4 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth pap> <magic 0x674d>
> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x4 <auth chap MD5>]
> rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x5 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth pap> <magic 0x674d>
> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x5 <auth pap>]
> rcvd [LCP TermReq id=0x6 00 00 02 dc]
> sent [LCP TermAck id=0x6]
> Hangup (SIGHUP)
Hi Malcolm,
I've also been dialing into an NT RAS server at work. I'm using Mandrake
5.2 and kppp with CHAP. I tried Mandrake 6.0 and could not make CHAP work
at all. I was forced to go back to 5.2 so I could dial into work from
home.
--
Keith Brown
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==============D51DE97E8FB377BEC7353B4D
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Malcolm Ferguso wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>A recent server upgrade has left me unable to connect
to our NT RAS at
<br>work. Our Network Admin backed off the security for us so that
it
<br>wasn't insisting on MS-CHAP 80, but I still can't connect. Can
anybody
<br>help me?
<p>Below I've included the syslog pppd debug messages (username and
<br>password '*'ed out) from my attempts using CHAP and PAP. As you
can
<br>see, the RAS initially challenges with "auth chap 80", but accepts
my
<br>request for "auth pap". However, it does not accept my username
and
<br>password, returning hardware error "E=691". Why? I can
connect from NT
<br>and 95.
<p>I'm using Mandrake 6.0 (based on Red Hat 6.0???) and pppd version 2.3.7.
<p>Connection using PAP:
<p>Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS1
<br>sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1<asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x9332fb4c> <pcomp>
<br><accomp>]
<br>rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x0 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth chap 80> <magic
0xbb0>
<br><pcomp> <accomp>]
<br>sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x0 <auth pap>]
<br>rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x9332fb4c> <pcomp>
<br><accomp>]
<br>rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth pap> <magic
0xbb0> <pcomp>
<br><accomp>]
<br>sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth pap> <magic
0xbb0> <pcomp>
<br><accomp>]
<br>sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x1 user="********" password="********"]
<br>sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x2 user="********" password="********"]
<br>rcvd [PAP AuthNak id=0x1 "E=691"]
<br>Remote message: E=691
<br>PAP authentication failed
<br>rcvd [LCP TermReq id=0x2 00 00 02 b3]
<br>LCP terminated by peer (^@^@^BM-3)
<br>sent [LCP TermAck id=0x2]
<br>Hangup (SIGHUP)
<br>Modem hangup
<br>Connection terminated.
<p>Connection using CHAP:
<p>sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xedbb9a76> <pcomp>
<br><accomp>]
<br>rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x0 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth chap 80> <magic
0x674d>
<br><pcomp> <accomp>]
<br>sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x0 <auth chap MD5>]
<br>rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xedbb9a76> <pcomp>
<br><accomp>]
<br>rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth 0xc027 01 00 00
01> <magic
<br>0x674d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
<br>sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x1 <auth chap MD5>]
<br>rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth 0xc123 01 00 00
01> <magic
<br>0x674d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
<br>sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x2 <auth chap MD5>]
<br>rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x3 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth pap> <magic
0x674d>
<br><pcomp> <accomp>]
<br>sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x3 <auth chap MD5>]
<br>rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x4 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth pap> <magic
0x674d>
<br><pcomp> <accomp>]
<br>sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x4 <auth chap MD5>]
<br>rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x5 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth pap> <magic
0x674d>
<br><pcomp> <accomp>]
<br>sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x5 <auth pap>]
<br>rcvd [LCP TermReq id=0x6 00 00 02 dc]
<br>sent [LCP TermAck id=0x6]
<br>Hangup (SIGHUP)</blockquote>
Hi Malcolm,
<p>I've also been dialing into an NT RAS server at work. I'm using
Mandrake 5.2 and kppp with CHAP. I tried Mandrake 6.0 and could not
make CHAP work at all. I was forced to go back to 5.2 so I could
dial into work from home.
<pre>--
Keith Brown
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</pre>
</html>
==============D51DE97E8FB377BEC7353B4D==
------------------------------
From: "Tom Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: e-mail virtual servers
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 18:59:45 -0400
Try qmail: www.qmail.org
Regards,
Tom Young
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=================
Bernat Ginard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi all,
I'm trying to install many e-mail virtual servers on the same Linux box:
one domain for each virtual server, and they should run in a fully
independent way.
Now I'm searching information about how to make it (I need a SMTP and a
POP3 servers that allow it, I've been looking the qpopper but it seems
not suporting it).
Could anybody help me, or tell me where can I get information about how
to build it?
--
Bernat Ginard Llad�
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kaos.es
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PPP connection doesn't work
Date: 24 Jul 1999 17:36:59 -0500
CNelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I have just tested your recommendation but it didn't work either.
: I am really going mad. Is there a bug in Linux's PPP? My Linux PPP
: client work when connection to NT RAS. My Linux PPP server works when
: win95 is connecting to it. How comes my Linux PPP client and Linux PPP
: server can't connect? I really don't understand.
: I use tcpdump at both side when pinging from client to server. It is
: displayed on client side but not server side. vice versa. It seems lower
: layer protocol can't make it. Since netstat -i shows a lot of RX-ERR.
I agree with all you say - well except that I really don't believe you're
going mad :) .
The tcpdump shows ping data when pinging from client to server and
netstat -i shows RX errors at the server - right? The vice versa I take
to mean that tcpdump shows ping data on the server when pinging from
the server to the client and netstat -i shows RX errors at the client.
I still can't explain what's going on. But try using the pppd option
kdebug 7 on whichever box the RX errors appear with some Linux-to-Linux
test scenario. This produces a hex dump of all the link negotiations
and all the data sent and received by pppd. It's a last resort but
maybe that can shed some light on what's happening.
The client link negotiation log in your post that followed this one
looked entirely normal.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* The wealth of a nation is created by the productive labor of its
* citizens. */
------------------------------
From: Ted Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Netscape Doesn't Work
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 19:04:05 -0400
Hello,
I just installed the RedHat 6.0. When I was installing the RedHat6.0, I
chose "static IP address" and put in the IP address and other required
info myself. Now I can telnet or ftp to other computers. But when I
run netscape, it doesn't go anywhere. So is there any problem with the
installation or the network setup?
Thanks
Ted
------------------------------
From: Abdullah =?iso-8859-9?Q?Ramazano=F0lu?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Cnet pro120c ether card with tulip driver
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 01:49:07 +0300
Hi,
Is there any one using CNET PRO120(C) 10/100 ether card without
problems?
It uses Macronix 98715 chip which uses tulip driver. I have two machines
(both RedHat 6.0, one is kernel 2.2.5-15, other is 2.2.5-22, and both
machines use the same pro120(c) card) connected via cross UTP. Installed
latest tulip driver (tried both 0.91 and 0.91g)
Two machines can ping each other. I have also stress tested by "ping
-f -s 16760" observing upto 60Mbps thruput. Also traceroute works as
usual. Also tftp (UDP) works. So far so good..
But any attempt to use rlogin, telnet, http or nfs hangs. Telnet goes as
far as establishing connection but it also hangs there without prompting
for login. Tftp works good, but sometimes transfer rate goes as low as
few 100 bits/sec. Successful PAM messages for rlogin attempts are logged
in remote machine's /var/log/messages file (login session opened for...)
but nothing happens at connecting side.
/etc/hosts.equiv and ~/.rhosts files allright. I also renamed
/etc/securetty, so that root can login from outside.
These symptoms go for both root and non-root users.
I cannot explain this behavior. I also have a Redhat 6.0 (at work) with
some other ether card (3com something as I remember) which works
normally. The most suspecting difference between the machines at work
and home is the ether cards.
So I really would like to know whether there is anybody out there
successfully using this card.
Thanks
--
Abdullah Ramazano�lu [ aramazanoglu AT demirbank DOT com DOT tr ]
------------------------------
From: Rod Roark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Losing interest
Date: 24 Jul 1999 23:38:10 GMT
Michael Haag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>I've been struggling to get my sound card functioning, my printer to
>print plain text files properly, and SAMBA to connect me to my NT
>shares. I've read the HOWTOS, followed suggestions I received via
>various newsgroups (when there was anything the least bit helpful, which
>wasn't often) and still haven't accomplished any of the above....
I set up machines to do these things every day. Email me or post here
(as appropriate) and I'll try to help. Be specific as to your
distribution, hardware, etc.
-- Rod
======================================================================
Sunset Systems Preconfigured Linux Computers
http://www.sunsetsystems.com/ and Custom Software
======================================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Post)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt
Subject: Re: Samba and Recycle Bin on NT 4.0
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 23:12:51 GMT
On Wed, 21 Jul 1999 18:51:07 +0200, Wolfgang Ganzert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there a simple possibility to add a recycle bin on a WinNT client on
>a network drive which is connected via samba.
Windows 95/98/NT have _never_ supported a recycle bin on network
drives, even if your talking about a completely Microsoft network
(i.e., no Linux, Samba, Netware, etc. involved). I'm afraid that what
you want to do is not supported.
To send me email, replace 'nospam' with 'home'.
------------------------------
From: Allen Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Netscape Doesn't Work
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 16:13:31 -0700
Ted,
Did you input the DNS info?
Allen
--
Linux: If you're not careful, you might actually learn something.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
