Linux-Networking Digest #73, Volume #12 Sun, 1 Aug 99 00:13:26 EDT
Contents:
Re: SMC1211tx PCI nic does not work !! HELP PLEASE. (Vidar Andresen)
Re: ppp - ping OK but no telnet/ftp/netscape - answer. (Vidar Andresen)
Re: Help need with LAN & PPP (routing prob) (Vidar Andresen)
Re: Web Based Linux Management (Eugene Strulyov)
Re: Allowing root telnets and dial-up logins (Richard Steiner)
Port scanner, etc. ("Max")
(SNTP) Simple Network Time Protocol, how???? (Jeff PIerce)
Re: ethernet card problem ("Ed Lentz")
S.O.S. Still having problems with modem speed ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
linux-2.2.5 network resource leak? (Jonathan Mayer)
Re: Networking Problem (Vidar Andresen)
Re: Ethernet card installation and configuring (Vidar Andresen)
Re: delaying eth0 initialization (Vidar Andresen)
Re: IPchains help (Eugene Strulyov)
Re: GNOME PPP Applet -- Unsolved Mystery? ("R.K.Aa")
terminate a connection?? (James Ho)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vidar Andresen)
Subject: Re: SMC1211tx PCI nic does not work !! HELP PLEASE.
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 02:45:37 GMT
In article <7ntor2$6q6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"John N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Need help please,
> I very "green" in linux, being a DOS/WINDOWS believer for a long
>time... my SMC1211tx PCI nic card does not work. I've downloaded the source
>code for this driver from smc for this nic card, but I do not know how to
>make it all work.
Try the rtl8139 driver, maybe already at hand in the distribution you
use. Start linuxconf (if there) and chose the rtl8139 module. (is it
there? not sure) If not:
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/index.html#PCI and choose
the 'RealTek RTL8129/8139 driver.' to go to:
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/rtl8139.html
The driver have had some new versions during the spring/summer, so if
trouble, get a updated driver. There is info on how to compile (also
in the end of the rtl8139.c If more then one prosessor in machine,
choose SMP-version on compile) and install.
For details http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/misc/modules.html
SMC + Accton = true. It might be (almost) the same nic sold as 1207d
at accton.
http://hq.accton.com.tw/ have some setup for their 1207d. The
setupdisk they offer is usful also because it have some info on the
card needs to be in a pci-busmaster slot. And some troubleshooting.
http://www.realtek.com.tw/cn/cn.html (or somewhere around) may give
info and setup as well. Get the rset8139.exe if needed.
Mvh Vidar Andresen
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vidar Andresen)
Subject: Re: ppp - ping OK but no telnet/ftp/netscape - answer.
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 02:45:45 GMT
In article <7nu1pf$41r$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Hayes) wrote:
[...]
>Thanks for all the help everyone, unfortunately that's not it.
>Someone (thankfully) pointed out to me that ping sends ICMP packets,
>so I did some investigation and my connection only chokes on TCP
>(didn't check UDP). I believe that the problem lies in the Van
>Jacobson compression. I'll be sure to post a followup if something
>develops along this line. Thanks for all the suggestions, though, I
>tried them to no avail. If I get it working I'll post something that
>might hopefully help some people out.
Some isp's have to be set to a lower MTU to work. Like 'PPP MTU: 500'
So it would have been interesting to se the output of ifconfig on
ppp0.
How the MTU is set to whatewer I am not sure. But guess 'man pppd' or
the docs have something to tell. There is also a MRU value to fiddle
with.
>From the ______dos-port_____ of pppd (works like a charm) I got this:
PPPD.MAN:
mru <n>
Set the MRU [Maximum Receive Unit] value to <n> for
negotiation. pppd will ask the peer to send pack-
ets of no more than <n> bytes. The minimum MRU
value is 128. The default MRU value is 1500. A
value of 296 is recommended for slow links (40
bytes for TCP/IP header + 256 bytes of data).
mtu <n>
Set the MTU [Maximum Transmit Unit] value to <n>.
Unless the peer requests a smaller value via MRU
negotiation, pppd will request that the kernel net-
working code send data packets of no more than n
bytes through the PPP network interface.
How it is done in linux, go for the docs.
Mvh Vidar Andresen
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vidar Andresen)
Subject: Re: Help need with LAN & PPP (routing prob)
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 02:45:54 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Sean C. Dyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have 2 linux machines and an Irix machine. I have a dynamic IP on 1
>linux machine to access the net. After getting this setup properly I
>am no longer able to access my local LAN. The oher machines don't
The files:
/etc/host.conf set how adresses is resolved.
order hosts, bind
tells to first look in /etc/hosts before quering a dns-server.
(/etc/resolv.conf is empty on my machine, but then i dont run any
modem, does this make sense? Yes. Please look at the PPP-HOWTO down
at chapter 10. You might need it.)
/etc/hosts is where adresses often used could be entered. Like:
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
192.168.0.1 Name-of-your-machine
208.221.1.2 other-linux-name
208.221.1.3 irix-name
/etc/hosts.allow
ALL: 127.0.0.1
ALL: 192.168.0.1
ALL: 208.221.1.2
ALL: 208.221.1.3
/etc/hosts.deny
ALL : ALL
You need to restart networking to get this going.
>access the net, and I would just like to be able to ftp and telnet to
>these other machines. Since I don't have a static IP address I am
>lost on how to configure this machine and still be able to access the
>net. I had to configure my IP address as 192.168.0.1 and my other
>machines are using 208.221.1.* (not real) So how do I make it so I can
>use my local network and still use the net?
The best solution would be to let all local machines have the
192.168.0.* ip-adresses. Saves a lot of trouble.
(and then i run into doubt. Is the '.0.' in 192.168.___0___.1
unproblematic, dont know, use '.1.' maybee.. That is 192.168.1.* So i
change and assume that from here and down. Someone ought to comment
on this)
If you cant do that (why not?) i guess it still can be done. (but if
'208.221.1.* (not real)' is a valid routable internet-adress, step
carful...)
Can you ping yourself by name and ip address while ppp is up?
like 'ping 192.168.1.1' ? or 'ping own-hostname'?
Guess so.
Then the next issue would be to make a route to 208.221.1.*
Ethernet-HOWTO down at chapter 5.7.
(but if you do so, all traffic to 208.221.1.* will go that way, and if
any existing real internett ip exist at that adress, you can not reach
it. step carful...)
route add -net 208.221.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0
(check the netmask)
But maybe better to only make a route to the two host out there:
route add -host 208.221.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0
route add -host 208.221.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0
(check the netmask)
At this point you should be abel to ping the 208.221.1.2 and
208.221.1.3 with ip and name. Not getting any respons, but listening
on 'tcpdump -i eth0 icmp' while doing so, the ping request should go
over the eth0 -interface. And seen as a reqest if running 'tcpdump -i
eth0 icmp' on the other machines.
But they will not know where to send the reply.
On the 208.221.1.* machines similar setup ned to be done. The
/etc/host(s).* files or equal.
You dont need dns on them, (not to be connected?) so (on the __other__
machines..)
/etc/host.conf set how adresses is resolved.
order hosts
(or equal) Will do.
But they need a route to the 192.168.1.* machine
route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0
(or equal) should be fine.
But. To save yourself this setup, i think it would have been much
better to have all three machines set up in one net.
Like 192.168.*.*
Mvh Vidar Andresen
------------------------------
From: Eugene Strulyov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.security
Subject: Re: Web Based Linux Management
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 02:40:39 GMT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------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Steiner)
Subject: Re: Allowing root telnets and dial-up logins
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 21:18:05 -0500
Here in comp.os.linux.networking, Matt Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
spake unto us, saying:
>Linux (at least Red Hat) apparently does not allow root logins via
>telnet or dial-up. How do you change this behavior to allow these
>logins? Thanks.
I've never understood why so many people ask this question.
What's wrong with simply doing "su -" to get root access for the short
period of time you need it?
Or are people simply unaware of the su command?
Color me confused. :-)
--
-Rich Steiner >>>---> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>---> Bloomington, MN
OS/2 + Linux + BeOS + FreeBSD + Solaris + WinNT4 + Win95 + DOS
+ VMWare + Fusion + vMac + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven! :-)
Save the Whales. Collect the entire set!
------------------------------
From: "Max" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Port scanner, etc.
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1999 03:12:58 +0200
Hi,
I organize a lan-party for about 150 computers,
I want to make sure that none tries to use port-scanners, back orifice,
nukers, etc.
Are there any good scripts or utils i can use to find out which ip in the
network makes those things ?
The problem is that most parts of the network are switched, and i can't
receive all packets ...
I use two 3com 3300 SWITCHES and some 1100 for the clients, additionally i
use some 100MBit HUBs.
Any suggestions ?
(Sorry for my bad english !!!)
Max
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 22:34:26 -0400
From: Jeff PIerce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: (SNTP) Simple Network Time Protocol, how????
I am trying to write a SNTP client. Ya know, request the time from a
Naval clock.
I have RFC-1769 and it states:
" The UDP port number assigned to NTP is 123, which should be used in
both teh Source Port and the destination Port fields in the header. "
I write a client, but when i try to bind with port 123 I get a
can't bind local address: Permission denied
Is this because it is listed in the /et/cservices? inetd.config does not
contain an enrty for NTP.
So, how do I get it to work for bind and communicate with a ntp server??
--
Jeff Pierce
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
http://www.newsfeeds.com The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
======== Over 73,000 Newsgroups = Including Dedicated Binaries Servers =======
------------------------------
From: "Ed Lentz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ethernet card problem
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 02:29:59 GMT
You don't say that you are using a "Cross" cable to connect the two boxes.
If not they must go through a Hub. I had the same problem with two Win98
machines.
Good luck
Ed
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: S.O.S. Still having problems with modem speed
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 03:12:27 GMT
I am having severe problems with the transfer rate over my modem. I
realize that this problem has been discussed in depth in this forum,
and I have attempted to employ many of the remedies suggested over the
past month or so, but so far I have had no luck.
I am running RH6.0 with a Blaster 56k external modem connected to the
first serial port. The second serial port had been the internal modem;
which I have since removed, and thus at present I have no second serial
port. As recommended here, I have run the program (setserial) and
determined that the IO address and interrupt for ttyS0 are 0x3f8 and
4. This is the same as they are under Windows 98, and I've been unable
to identify any device that could be causing interference on irq 4. I
used the program (pnpdump) which stated that there are no p and p
devices present. I also ran the program (irqtune) to place irq 4's
priority at the top of the list.
I really need a remote xwindow to view some graphics, which turned out
to be so slow that I would time out over the simplest graph. I've run
downloads on Netscape to check the transfer rate which turned out to
be 200~300 bytes/sec (occasionally I would see it reach 2k~3k, but
rarely) . What is even worse is that most of the time the program
reports "stalled" during the transfer. The same modem on the same
serial port using the same ISP under Windows 98 runs fine. I've spent
a lot of time on this problem and I need to get it solved. I would
very greatly appreciate any help that you can give me.
Again thanks for any help,
John
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Jonathan Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linux-2.2.5 network resource leak?
Date: 1 Aug 1999 03:27:35 GMT
Howdy,
I just upgraded to Red Hat 6 (2.2.5 kernel) a few weeks ago, and
I've noticed the following behavior: after continued use,
networking suddenly becomes less responsive. Stopping and
bringing back up the network interface seems to fix the problem.
For example, here's the result of a ping operation before, during,
and after a "network restart":
64 bytes from 10.9.25.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=998.4 ms
64 bytes from 10.9.25.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=1000.1 ms
64 bytes from 10.9.25.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=2000.0 ms
64 bytes from 10.9.25.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=1999.4 ms
ping: sendto: Network is unreachable
ping: wrote myhost.cobaltnet.com 64 chars, ret=-1
ping: sendto: Network is unreachable
ping: wrote myhost.cobaltnet.com 64 chars, ret=-1
64 bytes from 10.9.25.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=255 time=991.0 ms
64 bytes from 10.9.25.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=255 time=0.8 ms
64 bytes from 10.9.25.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=255 time=0.5 ms
64 bytes from 10.9.25.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=255 time=0.2 ms
64 bytes from 10.9.25.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=255 time=0.3 ms
Does anybody have any idea what might be causing this?
A little more information: 2.2.5 kernel, 3COM 3c905b
ethernet, pentii.
thanks,
Jonathan.
jmayer at cobaltnet.com
--------------------- jmayer cobaltnet.com -----------------------
"I'm fine now, thanks." - Craig Shergold
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vidar Andresen)
Subject: Re: Networking Problem
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 02:45:29 GMT
In article <7ntoiv$8hq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Fr�d�ric Bernard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>You know what ?
>
>IT WORKS !!!
Tres bien !!!
>I can't tell exactly were was the problem, but finally i took a brand new
>card from my personnal computer ,
>a D-LINK DFE530TX and with the help of some existing messages on here (again
>some from you!) I quickly was able to ping all machines on the network...
>Sure Netbios is over Tcp/ip.
>But i'm not finished with everything... cause i used a NE2K-PCI module
>because not seeing the via-rhide module in the linuxconf list,
>once i compiled (gcc with all arguments, then make config, make dep... if I
>try then make zlilo, it stops with errors telling me that the kernel is to
>big.... is it normal ?)
Yes. 2.2.* kernels need (i dont use) 'make bzImage' instead of 'make
zImage' (look at the 'README' in the kernel source for syntax and
details). So i guess a bzlilo (does that exist?) is needed.
What the 'b' does is compressing the kernel.
(bzip something compression. a 'rpm -qa | sort | less' gives a list.)
Not sure, dont use modules to often, (have it in kernel, that is ok on
isa-cards)) but could you _only_ compile the via-rhine.c to a module
and isntall it? as described in bottom of it, (compile-command: "gcc
-DMODULE ...... ...), and.. The right procedure is probably here:
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/misc/modules.html
>Anyway, the NE2K module works with the card even if it is probably not an
>optimal solution (i mean ping is not as fast as on other machines...)
>
>Finally, the 3C509 combo and the 3C900 Combo-PCI never worked , and the
The 3C509 combo surprise me. If you turned off pnp, it is a 3com509b.
The 'b' is essential.
Irq conflict, eisa card, 'boot with pnp-os' overclocked machine, isa
bus above 8Mhz, newest driver (??) there is even a setting to
3c509 card is not detected on overclocked machines
Increase the delay time in id_read_eeprom() from the current
value, 500, to an absurdly high value, such as 5000.
>I think i will post my results as an indeoendant message on here, especially
>to thank everyone who took some time for helping me..
Nah.. more interesting to know _what_ did work..
>Thanx anyway to you Vidar !
Your welcome. To me this is more a method to get grip on what is
going on, and to solve problems is a way of learning. So.. Nah..
more interesting to know _what_ did work..
Mvh Vidar Andresen
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vidar Andresen)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Ethernet card installation and configuring
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 02:45:41 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Michael J Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello all-
>
>I have physically installed an ethernet card in my system and am trying
>to configure it for Linux (I am using Red Hat 6.0).
You need to know what ethernet nic is installed. Brand, model, and
check what module it need.
>I think I next need to configure and rebuild the kernel - is this the
>correct action or is there an easier way around this - or would it just
Easyer way around. Normally.
>be easier to reinstall Linux (I remember during the setup it asking if I
>wanted to configure the OS for a LAN).
If that mean that you dont have a lot of packages needed installed, i
guess you could, not reinstall, but start a install and choose to
'upgrade an existing installation' or what it is called. There chose
to have networking.
Could work.
>If rebuilding the kernel is the way to go, where are the best sources of
>information to get step-by-step instructions for this.
You normally dont. But if so, installing kernel sources (and whatever
it demands of packets to be happy), reading the 'README' in the kernel
source when unpacked, the /usr/doc/HOWTO and kernel-HOWTO.
Should take you there.
Mvh Vidar Andresen
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vidar Andresen)
Subject: Re: delaying eth0 initialization
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 02:45:49 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vidar Andresen) wrote:
>To get it running, I suggest unplug (maybe problem..) the box from the
>net. And use lets say 'linuxconf' to configure the nic with the right
>modul, and a static ip-address, (192.168.0.2, netmask 255.255.255.0)
>(that is not dhcp).
I se myself put out 192.168.0.* values a lot of times, but dont use
myself. Is there any problem in using the 192.168.___0___.* ?
To use 192.168.0.0 would be no god..
Hmm..
Mvh Vidar Andresen
------------------------------
From: Eugene Strulyov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPchains help
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 02:45:35 GMT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------------------------------
From: "R.K.Aa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: GNOME PPP Applet -- Unsolved Mystery?
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 05:27:42 +0200
Mladen Gavrilovic wrote:
>
> The ppp applet doesn't have a "properties" selection. When I
> right-click on it, all I get is "remove from panel", "move applet", and
> "about".
Oops.. in that case, take a look at the Gnome updates the RedHat6 errata
page.
A whole bunch. I don't use the ppp applet had upgraded at the time i
looked at it.
K.
--
-- To E-mail, delete "spam" --
------------------------------
From: James Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: terminate a connection??
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 11:56:43 +1000
Hi there.
when i type 'netstat' i see a list of TCP connections to my box...how
can I manually close/terminate one of them?
Thanks
James
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
