Linux-Networking Digest #137, Volume #12 Fri, 6 Aug 99 22:13:36 EDT
Contents:
Re: ICMP (Greg Leblanc)
port forwarding and X, take 3 (Eric deRiel)
TCP/IP stack dissappearing without reason!?! ("Ittlecas")
Re: Samba slow one direction only! (Oliver Nelson)
mount options under AMD (Wei Yang)
Re: netscape java redhat 6 (Dennis Kinder)
Re: SoundBlaster Live! & Mandrake 6.0 (Rob van Hout)
How to work out Address & IRQ of NE2000 ("Ben Holness")
Re: You'll never figure this one out, port 80 dead? ("Robert Glover")
Linux to Win9x parallel connection ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: SoundBlaster Live! & Mandrake 6.0 ("Tim Sander")
Re: Kill -9 won't kill a process ("Gene Heskett")
Re: Firewall setup... what to install? ("Charles Blackburn")
Re: Questions about Linux, IPMASQ, and @Home... ("Eugene")
Re: Poor network performance ("Simon Forman")
Re: Loadlin and Ne2k-PCI (Greg Leblanc)
all adult 50650 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: kppp dconnecting to NT server (Richard Birchall)
ipchains + www.linuxrouter.org = firewall messages (Joshua Curtis)
pppd performance ("Gary")
Re: use 486 as x terminal or server or use pent pro... (John Doe)
Re: samba nmb services ("David B. Hostetler")
Problems sending mail to my server using @home (Jeff Peterson)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Greg Leblanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ICMP
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 21:48:49 GMT
I don't understand what your problem is, but I can tell you what ICMP
is. ICMP is part of the tcp/ip protocol. It is used to for pings and
traceroutes, among other things. It stands for Internet Control Message
Protocol, or something very similar. If you can clarify what your
question is, somebody may be able to help you.
Greg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good Day,
>
> Intalled redhat 6.0 mandrake with KDE desktop(man this is awsome).
The
> problem is that ICMP is trying to send something to a invald address
> over the internet. My question is what is ICMP, and how am I going
to
> fix this error. I have tryed to look around for help files,
newgroups,
> linux sites with no luck in finding my answer what ICMP is. I know my
> way around the filesystem somewhat, I am still considered somewhat of
a
> newbie.
>
> Thanks for any help in advance.
>
> Jeff
>
> Please e-mail me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
It's pronounced "sexy" not "scuzzy"!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x,comp.windows.x
Subject: port forwarding and X, take 3
From: Eric deRiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 22:10:17 GMT
I have successfully rigged a Linux masquerading firewall as follows:
ipmasqadm autofw -r tcp 6000 7000 -h <address>
where <address> is the IP address of an X server within the
masqueraded network. The intent is to cause X connections opened on the
masquerading computer, which is not running X, to be forwarded to the
internal machine, which is.
What I'm wondering is if it's possible to add another masqueraded X
server to this arrangement so that a remote client can choose which X
server on the internal network it wants to use. It would be easy
enough to forward another port range (16000 to 17000, say) to the
second server, but how does one get an X client to recognize a
non-standard port range? Is there another way to do this that I just
don't see? Any help is greatly appreciated.
eric
--
Supply networks for life saving medications will cause shortages.
------------------------------
From: "Ittlecas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: TCP/IP stack dissappearing without reason!?!
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 22:50:11 GMT
I have a slackware kernel 2.2.6 basic install running samba 2.0.4b and
apache 1.3.6 along with basic ftp, telnet, ect....
The problem I have is that the server will occasionally just lose all
TCP/IP services. The server will show all ok on ifconfig but theres no
ping responce and all services will be unavailable even from the server
itself (ex. lynx 10.1.1.3 from the server results in server not found). I
have stopped the smbd, nmbdm, and httpd and the server will still fail from
time to time. Oddly enuf the server will return to normal after between 10
and 120 seconds, or so. The machine is a Cyrix 200 with a Intel
EtherExpress 10/100b and 64mb ram. Any ideas what causes this strange (and
annoying) problem or what causes the TCP/IP stack will return on its own?
Many thanks.
Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Oliver Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba slow one direction only!
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 16:19:52 -0700
Alex,
I've got it working on another network finally!!!!!!!
Its something on my network. I don't particularly care right now what is causing it,
I'm
just glad it wasn't a software configuration problem.
In other words, I do know what I'm doing <vbg>!
OLIVER
------------------------------
From: wyang@zboson (Wei Yang)
Subject: mount options under AMD
Date: 6 Aug 1999 22:49:16 GMT
Hi,
I am using AMD to do NFS mount. I want to mount NFS filesystems with
options rsize=8192 and wrize=8912. How can I do that?
regards,
--
Wei Yang
Unix System Admin.
Dept. of Physics
Colorado State Univ.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Dennis Kinder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: netscape java redhat 6
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 10:50:32 -0600
David Pollack wrote:
> edit the /etc/X11/fs/config file and add 75dpi fonts but leave off the
> :unscaled part. Basically add a line like
>
> /usr/X11R6/libs/X11/fonts/75dpi
>
> I am not sure if that is the exact line but it should be something
> similar...
>
> Dennis Kinder wrote:
> >
> > Please tell me how to get Netscape to work with java in redhat 6.
> > Every time a page with java opens the netscape closes.
> > Thank you.
Thanks that solved the problem
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rob van Hout)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: SoundBlaster Live! & Mandrake 6.0
Date: 6 Aug 1999 23:02:51 GMT
On Fri, 06 Aug 1999 01:07:54 GMT, Christopher A. Gorski scribbled:
> program "esd" in the background, which is apparently the sound daemon.
[rob@gemini rob]$ ps aux | grpe esd
rob 438 0.0 0.2 836 348 p0 S 00:10 0:00 grep esd
Nope, not running that one ;-)
> the computer appears to be playing mp3s and wavs (a program showing 3-d
> waveform graphs from sound card data appears to be verifying that the sound
> card is getting something) but my SB Live won't produce any sound out of the
> digital or analog ports (so nothing comes out of the speakers)
Did you check the mixer settings? Try running xmixer or something. Also: you
must have sound card support compiled as a module in the kernel.
--
Rob van Hout
==========================================================================
Running Red Hat Linux 5.2, kernel 2.2.10 on a dual Pentium Pro 200 / 128MB
------------------------------
From: "Ben Holness" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.networking.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.windows
Subject: How to work out Address & IRQ of NE2000
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1999 00:12:44 +0100
Hi all,
I have an NE2000 compatible network card (It's actually a LAN Research
LR2000).
I do not know what the jumper settings relate too and I have no
documentation etc.
I can put it in a Linux machine or a Windows machine.
Does anyone know of a utility for either Linux or Windows that will try to
work out what the IRQ/Address is for this card, with the jumpers as they
are?
Many thanks,
Ben
------------------------------
From: "Robert Glover" <rglover@air(dot)ups(dot)com>
Subject: Re: You'll never figure this one out, port 80 dead?
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 14:46:46 -0000
I had a similar problem just yesterday. I don't know if this will
help you, but to make a long story short: my masquerading box did not
accept certain crucial updates to it's DHCP settings from the ISP and
as a result, name resolution stopped working. I just killed and
restarted my dhpc client and things began to work immediately.
If this doesn't help (or doesn't apply), you should try using tcpdump
on both your internal and external interface at the same time while
you try to connect to an http site. It should shed some light on
things.
Don't fear the penguin!
David Murray wrote in message
<01bee00d$b224b7a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I have a problem which I can't even fathom, much less solve.. but
here
>goes.
>
>First, a quick rundown of my network. 6 PCs with addresses of
>192.168.0.xxx. Four of the PCs run Windows, 2 run Linux. The
server is
>RedHat 5.2 and is an IP Masquerading server for the other
workstations.
>The other linux machine is RedHat 6.0 but also has a dual boot to
Windows
>95. Just the other day the RedHat6.0 workstation stopped being able
to
>browse the web. It could still telnet, ping, do pop3, and FTP..
just no
>HTTP and it didn't matter what the webbrowser was. I tried Netscape,
KFM,
>and Lynx. It just sits there "connecting to server..." Oddly enough,
when
>booted into Windows 95 (using the same IP address) it is able to
browse
>websites, so I rule out the server as a problem. So I decided to do
an
>experiment and connected to another PC running Linuxconf in HTTP
mode.. so
>I could use port 98 instead of port 80. guess what? My webbrowser
on
>RedHat6 pulls it up just fine. So it most definatly appears that
port 80
>is somehow screwed. Now here is where it becomes worse. I decided
rather
>than to screw with it that I would just restore my system from a
ghost
>image I made a few weeks ago when it was working fine... same
problem.
>Just for the heck, I restored the server from a ghosted backup also..
same
>problem. So now it appears I have to solve this problem on my own..
what
>could it be?
>--DavidM
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux to Win9x parallel connection
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 23:56:00 GMT
I am curious if there is anyway to network a
Linux box with a Win9x machine using the parallel
port.
I have viewed the PLIP miniHOW-TO but found that
it only talked mostly about Linux to Linux
connections.
I don't have the money to go and purchase NICs
and a hub so this is my only option.
Any help would be greatly apprecitated.
(I'm using RH 5.2 trying to hook to a 98 box)
Thanks.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Tim Sander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: SoundBlaster Live! & Mandrake 6.0
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 20:05:50 -0400
Terrance,
I have the driver downloaded and I'm soon going to reconfigure the 2.2.10
kernel and compile it. This is on Mandrake 6. Exactly how do I go about
getting the driver to work? You had to install RH 6 instead of or on top of
Mandrake???
Can you describe your painful journey?
Thanks. Email me if you'd rather.
Tim
Terrance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7of4hc$4d9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> My SB Live! card is now working. Though Mandrake 6.0 is 99%
> compatible
> with RH6.0, the 1% seems to be a problem for this poorly written
> driver. After
> installing RH6.0 and reinstall the E-mu APS SBLive! drivers my card
> now
> plays .wav and .mp3 files.
>
> Terrance wrote in message <7ocf7c$6gr$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >I downloaded and installed the latest Live! drivers. I've tried the
> >latest SBLive!/E-mu APS and SBLive! Linux drivers. In each case, I
> >can only play audio CDs. No .wav or .mid files. The drivers bombs
> >when attempting to play these files. Has anyone had success with
> >these drivers? If so, how?
> >
> >
>
>
------------------------------
Date: 06 Aug 99 20:21:25 -0500
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Kill -9 won't kill a process
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.setup
Unrot13 this;
Reply to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gene Heskett sends Greetings to Gary Smith;
GS> Sound like the kernel is having trouble writing the core file. Are you
GS> out of disk space ?
GS> Try deleting the core file. The kernel may give up writing to it and
GS> proceed to terminate the process.
I don't recall running into a core at some location it might have been
written, and there's 17 gigs of drive to write it to.
Thanks for the reply.
Cheers, Gene
--
Gene Heskett, CET, UHK |Amiga A2k Zeus040 50 megs fast/2 megs chip
Ch. Eng. @ WDTV-5 |A2091,GuruRom,1g Seagate,CDROM,Multiface III
|Buddha + 4 gig WDC drive, 525 meg tape
|Stylus Pro, EnPrint, Picasso-II, 17" vga
RC5-Moo! 690kkeys/sec isn't much, but it all helps
email gene underscore heskett at iolinc dot net
--
------------------------------
From: "Charles Blackburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Firewall setup... what to install?
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 01:02:09 +0100
Charles Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:OPLp3.2548$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Try the IPChains-HowTo. With three lines of "code" you'll have your
> firewall up and running in no time. Of course, you'll need to install
> ipchains if it isn't already installed. Also, in this month's Linux
> Magazine, there was an excellent example showing how do exactly what you
> request.
how do I get this magazine in birmingham, uk
regards
charles blackburn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Questions about Linux, IPMASQ, and @Home...
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1999 00:49:38 GMT
> before I buy the networking equipment. I've heard that some people have
> had problems with the @Home modem because it was PnP, being a newbie
The cable modem is an external device. It has nothing to do with pnp. It
connects to the computer via a network card interface. The network card will
most likely be pnp. But I've got two generic PCI ne2000-compatible NICs (the
cheapest/most generic kind) and they work great -- no problems whatsoever.
Oh yeah, you can't buy a cable modem in a store anyway. And strictly
speaking it's not even a modem. It's more like a router. They just decided
to call it that way. But anyway, as you (hopefully) have guessed, the kind
of modem they give you is irrelevant, since it is external and connects to
the computer via a network card.
> with Linux? How do I go about getting my Windows box to recognize the
> Linux one? If I setup the Linux box with IPMASQ, will I have to setup
read networking howto at www.linux.org/help
> simple diagram or write how I would connect everything? I think I would
> connect both boxes to the hub, and the Linux box to the cable modem and
> then setup everything else by software, is this right? How do I setup
the Linux box needs two network cards. One goes to the hub, the other to the
cable modem.
> file, printer, and drive sharing among the two boxes?
www.samba.org
------------------------------
From: "Simon Forman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Poor network performance
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 16:43:14 +0100
> >Performance of both is poor. For example a 4.5GB file takes 4363 seconds
to
> >ftp
> >(thats only 104 Kbytes/sec). The response is slow regardless of which
Actually it's about 1050Kbytes/sec, which is about right for 10Mb ethernet.
Simon.
------------------------------
From: Greg Leblanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Loadlin and Ne2k-PCI
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 21:52:58 GMT
It would be nice if you could tell the rest of us how to fix the problem
if you know how. This group is here so that we can all learn a little
bit, and get help when we need it. Using email for these things cuts out
of of learning how to fix things. PLEASE post fixes, solutions, and
questions so that everyone may benefit.
Greg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Colin Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you fix the problem yet?
> If not, email me and I can help. Your card is RTL8029 chipset?
good... I have
> those too, and they are working fine.
>
> Colin
>
> Juergen Micka wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I ran into a booting problem with my Reltec Ne2k-PCI card. If I'm
executing
> > Loadlin on my Win98 to start Linux the kernel detects a wrong
io-address and
> > irq-line.
> > Do I use a bootdisk instead, the kernel detects the PCI card
correctly.
> > Next I made a linux.par file for Loadlin and tried to set PCI card
to the
> > settings which Win98 uses ("ether=10,0e400,0,0,eth0"). But it seems
to me
> > that I can't set pci-cards to specific irqs and io-addresses. Even
patching
> > the kernel source with the parameters didn't work!
> > Unfortunatly the bootdisk solution isn't acceptable, cause we want
to remote
> > boot the 2 os's.
> >
> > Does anyone have an idea how to achive this?
> > Any suggestions appreciated
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> > Jens
>
>
--
It's pronounced "sexy" not "scuzzy"!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.powerpc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: all adult 50650
Date: Friday, 06 Aug 1999 16:47:00 -0600
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adults Only:
http://207.240.225.250
Z[X`G;G"
{}{}{} Posted via Uncensored-News.Com, http://www.uncensored-news.com {}{}{}
{}{}{}{} Only $8.95 A Month, - The Worlds Uncensored News Source {}{}{}{}
{}{}{}{}{} Five News Servers with a BINARIES ONLY Server {}{}{}{}{}
------------------------------
From: Richard Birchall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: kppp dconnecting to NT server
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 14:34:34 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My ISP has a NT server. I am running RedHat6. Dialing by kppp is ok,
> but I cannot receive the authentication after the connection and I get a
> timeout. All what is reported by the log is that pppd has went down on
> signal 15. The authentication by my side is configured as PAP.
Upgrade to the latest version kppp, then read the online help file.
Regards,
Richard
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Joshua Curtis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ipchains + www.linuxrouter.org = firewall messages
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 14:42:07 GMT
I am having a problem with getting a few sites with masqueradeing and
ipchains turned on.
This is what i am getting in /var/log/messages when i try to get on
www.linuxrouter.org
Packet log: input deny ppp0 proto=6 24.3.133.48:80 204.186.132.133:62234
l=60 s=0x00 i=39322 f=0x400 t=51
I am not sure what that means so if you can help please let me know.
I am blocking everything except www and ftp from the internet. I am
useing a 56k modem on the gateway machine to get on the net and all
other machine are going throught it to the net.
I did try to get on the site from work via a T-1 and a cisco firewall
and it worked.
--
Joshua M Curtis
http://www.curtisonline.net
Lancaster Co. Linux Users Group
http://lclug.hypermart.net
------------------------------
From: "Gary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pppd performance
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 17:25:29 -0700
I'm running RH5.2 as a gateway on an intel box with 3coms X2 V90 modem and
IP maskerading. When I use this modem in Win95, I get great connection
speeds every time. With RH, it's very slow (it seems like 28.8). The modem
connects with that distinct V90 tone though. How do I know what speed I
connected at? Do I need to update my pppd or fine tune it (pppd ver
2.3.5-1) so I can connect at 50k plus? Please help, Thanks.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Doe)
Crossposted-To: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
Subject: Re: use 486 as x terminal or server or use pent pro...
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 6 Aug 1999 20:20:04 -0500
On Fri, 06 Aug 1999 20:40:30 GMT,
Gaiko Kyofusho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi, i have a 486 full tower that i have stuffed full of old hard drives
> and such (cause it is the only thing i have that can hold so many
>drives (which separate aren't that big) but recently was given a old
>pent pro chip/mother board (and i will get a atx eventually) and here is
>what i am wondering would it be a better use of "resources" (this is for
>a dinky home network mind you) for me to use my 486 as a X terminal or
>as a server or would it be better to use the pent pro (especially if i
>get a full tower) as the server? also, i only have 10 Mbps network
>cards and am too poor <cheap?> to invest in faster cards.
>
>thank you,
>
> -Gaiko
>
>Gaikokujin Kyofusho
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "David B. Hostetler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: samba nmb services
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 19:40:39 -0500
==============2AAA29C3D979FAB567C675E6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
"the nmbd daemon provides NetBIOS nameserving and browsing support."
P. 304
Red Hat Linux Unleashed. Third Edition.
David Pitts, Bill Ball.
1998 Sams Publishing.
Having said that what does it mean? Heck if I know.
Seriously nmb supplies nameserver support so you can call box A Bob, and
box B Chuck, or whatever you'd like. Which Linux 6.0 are you using? Red
Hat, Mandrake, or other?
To all the other distribution's adherents please note that the term
other is not meant as derogitory, I am just ignorant of any other linux
distribution that is using a 6.x release number at this time.
WChan21438 wrote:
> I am trying to setup samba in linux 6.0.
> When I type /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb start I get a message:
>
> ...NMB servcies [failed]
>
> What is NMB?
>
> Wayne
==============2AAA29C3D979FAB567C675E6
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
"the nmbd daemon provides NetBIOS nameserving and browsing support."
<br>P. 304
<br><u>Red Hat Linux Unleashed. Third Edition.</u>
<br>David Pitts, Bill Ball.
<br>1998 Sams Publishing.
<p>Having said that what does it mean? Heck if I know.
<br>Seriously nmb supplies nameserver support so you can call box A Bob,
and box B Chuck, or whatever you'd like. Which Linux 6.0 are you using?
Red Hat, Mandrake, or other?
<br>To all the other distribution's adherents please note that the term
other is not meant as derogitory, I am just ignorant of any other linux
distribution that is using a 6.x release number at this time.
<br>
<p>WChan21438 wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>I am trying to setup samba in linux 6.0.
<br>When I type /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb start I get a message:
<p>...NMB servcies [failed]
<p>What is NMB?
<p>Wayne</blockquote>
</html>
==============2AAA29C3D979FAB567C675E6==
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Peterson)
Subject: Problems sending mail to my server using @home
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1999 01:48:54 GMT
I am having problems in sending email to my RH6 machine from an
outside source such as Hotmail or my work computer. I have no problem
sending email out from the box, or remotely retrieving my mail via
POP. I currently have an account with @home and a curently stable IP.
In test #1, I can send email by using an IP address with no problem.
When viewing the email, I noticed that my host name was cutoff from
the address.
In test #2, the Hotmail server could not find that abbreviated
address. I understand why this does not work, but thought I would try
it.
In test #3, I tried sending mail using the full name, but that was
bounced back also.
In the test #4, I sent this email out while I was actually sitting in
Linux. It looks as this makes it.
In final test #5, it seems my computer sees the mail, but refused it
for some reason?? Any ideas??
cheeser.penguinpowered.com works fine when going to my site via http.
THANKS for any assistance or direction one can provide.
=============
=============
=============
1) Test email to "jeff@[24.8.23.36]"
==============
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2) Test to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
==============
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sorry, I couldn't find any host named aurora1.co.home.com. (#5.1.2)
3) Test to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
===============
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't
work out.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sorry, I couldn't find any host named cc49696-a.aurora1.co.home.com.
(#5.1.2)
4) Test to my JustLinux dynamic address
" [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
==================
===== Transcript of session follows =====
553 cheeser.penguinpowered.com. config error: mail loops back to me
(MX problem?)
554 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Local configuration error
5)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
24.8.23.36 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Relaying
denied Giving up on 24.8.23.36.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
