Linux-Networking Digest #184, Volume #12 Tue, 10 Aug 99 23:13:36 EDT
Contents:
FTP client is very slow to transfer large files (root)
Re: Cyrus, Procmail, and Postfix--HELP!! (Matthew Vanecek)
Re: Will I ever be able to use Linux at all?? HELP! (Clifford Kite)
DNS question... (Jon Boyer)
Re: Anyone seen this /var/log/messages output before? ("Russell D. Mora")
Re: DNS on Linux @home Box ("Douglas J. Olivier")
Help, _X11TransSocketINETConnect: Can't get address for p200. ("Klas Sehlstedt")
Windows Server, Linux Client? [Samba Peer to Peer? Revised] ("Chris Testa")
Re: Add new Ethernet Adapater to RH 5.2 (Vidar Andresen)
Re: Is there an easy way to change user password from desktop (Joe Zeff)
Re: cheap ethernet card recognition ? ("Andrew J. Norman")
Neighbour Table Overflow Message (DavidHenderson)
Re: smb.conf (sham khalil)
Re: Samba Shares ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: accessing mars-nwe using NET (QuestionExchange)
IPCHAINS Question ("Graham Fountain")
Re: Networking with Solaris...need help please (peter holmes)
IPchains...one internal host deny (Marek)
Re: linux problems - LAN ipmasqed by linux box to cable modem, also linux locking up
(??!!) (Mark Post)
Re: Installing 3C509 Card - Debian 2.1 - Problem (Warren Whitney)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTP client is very slow to transfer large files
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 20:23:54 -0400
Hello,
I'm running SuSE 6.0 with linux 2.0.36. I have very slow transfer rates
using ftp between this linux box and HP workstations attached to this
network. This machine has a 100Mbit ethernet. The problem arises if I
start the ftp session here or in the remote HP machine.
Notoriously, when I use netscape to connect and do the transfer, it is
in the order of hundreds of kbytes per sec.
I've seen posts about similar problems with Samba connections and ftp,
but no real answer I could use.
Could someone give some suggestions? Please Cc: to my mail box too.
Rafael H.
------------------------------
From: Matthew Vanecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.mail.imap
Subject: Re: Cyrus, Procmail, and Postfix--HELP!!
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 19:55:13 -0500
Tobias Knowles wrote:
>
> Im not familiar with postfix, but using exim I was able to get this to work.
> The key is exim changes to a given user depending on certain factors.
> I've setup a procmail.generic file under /home/cyrus that is called by exim
> /usr/bin/procmail -p procmail.generic. Then you can do your
> delivery/filtering from procmail.
> /usr/cyrus/bin/deliver -e -a USER -m user.USER
> Here's a link to an article that goes into this a bit further.
> http://www.idg.net/gomail.cgi?id=19699
>
> Tobias Knowles
>
> Matthew Vanecek wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >I have cyrus-imapd 1.5.19, procmail, and postfix 19990317 build. I have
> >just changed to cyrus from wu imapd.
> >
> >How do I get procmail to work with cyrus? I've tried a short progie
> >called "deliver-wrapper" as the action line in my .procmailrc, but it
> >doesn't work if the mail is handled by the MTA. And you can't call the
> >cyrus deliver program directly
> >
> >The .procmailrc works properly, if I run procmail directly, e.g.,
> >
> >procmail < testmsg.txt
> >
> >but when mail comes in through postfix, it doesn't get distributed
> >through the system.
>From what I understand, exim is a monolithic mta, like sendmail. Postfix
and qmail are distributed, split into several apps. This makes things
more secure, but in this situation, problematic.
The goal here is to avoid messing with the cyrus installation at all.
I've tried several things, but nothing seems to work. I've used a
wrapper that comes with the RH rpm; I've modified that wrapper, I've
changed the execute permissions on /usr/cyrus/bin/deliver to be a+rx.
Nothing works. Procmail runs, as far as I can tell, but there are no
error messages, and mail doesn't get deliverd, using either deliver or
the wrapper. However, if I run procmail by hand, as I did above, then
the message gets delivered appropriately. But it won't deliver, if the
message comes in via postfix. Which I don't understand, because
procmail runs with the same permissions in both cases.
This is really annoying. Surely there must be a reason why procmail and
the wrapper work, if run directly from the command line, but doesn't
work when it's called by the MTA
--
Matthew Vanecek
Course of Study: http://www.unt.edu/bcis
Visit my Website at http://people.unt.edu/~mev0003
For answers type: perl -e 'print
$i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);'
*****************************************************************
For 93 million miles, there is nothing between the sun and my shadow
except me. I'm always getting in the way of something...
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: Will I ever be able to use Linux at all?? HELP!
Date: 10 Aug 1999 18:49:07 -0500
Pedro Couto e Santos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I've just installed Suse 6.1 and I'm all happy and fuzzy about it...
: trouble is... I can't connect to the internet. I have absolutely no
: CLUE at all as to what to donext... I have a Cardinal MVP2888I Modem.
: I try using yast to configure it but it doesn't work(?)
: It keeps returning a 0.0.0.0 IP adress...
It's not clear what this means, you should post logs rather than attempt
a narrative. Here's a wild guess though. The address you see is the
address for the remote, i.e., the ISP. In that case use the pppd option
:192.168.0.1 and 192.168.0.1 should work as the remote address for
the PPP interface.
I don't kppp so but you should be able to put that in /etc/ppp/options.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Speak softly and carry a +6 two-handed sword. */
------------------------------
From: Jon Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DNS question...
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 15:44:14 -0400
I am hoping someone here can help me. I have a host name that is part
of my registered domain that was originally mapped to an IP address, say
1.2.3.4. I changed providers and it should now be pointing to 5.6.7.8.
When I do nslookup on the hostname, however, it still returns 1.2.3.4
The DNS entries for db.mydomain.com and the ptr record in the
in-addr.arpa file are both correct. What could be the problem?
------------------------------
From: "Russell D. Mora" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Anyone seen this /var/log/messages output before?
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 12:16:32 +1200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Glover wrote:
>
> They usually indicate some sort of attempt to use IP aliasing dont
> they?
>
> Russell D. Mora wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Jan Oosting wrote:
>
> Does anyone know what the significance of the numbers after the
> "ppp0:" is? I assume this is just attempt number.
>
Eureka. Thanks, this was just the piece of information I needed.
OK, all those out there with any of these problems....
modprobe: can't locate module ppp0:0
....
modprobe: can't locate module ppp0:49
or
modprobe: can't locate module lo:0
....
modprobe: can't locate module lo:49
or
modprobe: can't locate module eth0:0
....
modprobe: can't locate module eth0:49
or something similar, try recompiling your kernel with the option
CONFIG_IP_ALIAS turned on. This can be found under the title
"IP:aliasing support" in the "Networking options" submenu. This removed
the messages regarding lo and ppp0 for me.
Regards,
Russell Mora.
------------------------------
From: "Douglas J. Olivier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DNS on Linux @home Box
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 19:57:57 -0400
Hayden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:iDRr3.39453$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> DNS on Linux @home Box
> Hi all:
> I have a linux box here that is set up as a poxy server for my internal
> network. It has two network cards, 1 connected to the cable modem and one
> to the internal network. I want to register a domain for my linux box so
> that i can play with mail services along with some other things....it's
also
> nice to be able to host my own web server with a real domain name.....
>
> but when i am trying to register for a .on.ca domain, i was asked to
provide
> the address of the ns server... or ns lookup.... then i realize that i
gotta
I suggest using soa.granitecanyon.com for free nameserver services works
well for me.
> configure a DNS server so to help resolve my domain (or so i think...)
>
> so is this the best solution? To configure a DNS server on my linux
> box....and then i can register my domain and it will work? And if so, how
> does a DNS server work and how do you configure a domain server?
> Help....
> Thanks in advance!
> Hayden
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Klas Sehlstedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help, _X11TransSocketINETConnect: Can't get address for p200.
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 22:22:01 +0200
Hi
Have a problem with XDM or XDMCP
It has something to do with resolve of name to IP address:
Here is an excerpt from my log file:
X11TransSocketINETConnect: Can't get address for p200.
xdm error (pid 863): server open failed for p200.:0, giving up
xdm error (pid 717): Display p200.:0 cannot be opened
xdm error (pid 717): Display p200.:0 is being disabled
Int the second row one can see that it tries to open display
p200.:0 this is wrong it should be
p200:0 or p200.kussered.net:0 or 10.0.0.126:0.
nslookup
works
p200 gives 10.0.0.126 etc
p200.kussered.net is a windows 98 machine running an xserver software.
Yes I have tried other xserver software. and other machines
Any suggestions ?
------------------------------
From: "Chris Testa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Windows Server, Linux Client? [Samba Peer to Peer? Revised]
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 21:31:11 -0400
OK, here is my problem. For the past while I have had a LAN connecting my
parents Win95 machine to my Win98 macine. The 95 machine has a connection
to the phone line, and I have been using a Proxy server to connect to that
machine and use the net at the same time. On Sunday I installed Red Hat 6.0
on my machine. My problem is that I want to connect to the internet using
Linux through my parent's machine like I have always done, but I can't find
any info on how to do it. My ISP dynamically allocates our IP address, so
that complicates the matter. Basically, here's the setup:
__________ __________
| Parent's | | My Comp |
INTERNET | Comp | | (Running |
<-------- | (Dynamic | ---HUB--- | Linux or |
| IP) Win95| | Win98) |
|__________| |__________|
I realize that IP-Masquirading exists, but that only works with the Linux
machine as the server, i want it as the client. I also know about proxy
servers, like squid, but they are too large for a 2 computer network, and
again, use Linux as the server. Any help would be greatly appreciated:-)
--
- Chris
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vidar Andresen)
Subject: Re: Add new Ethernet Adapater to RH 5.2
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 01:04:18 GMT
In article <7onpeo$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roger Jagoda) wrote:
[...]
>So, how does one add an ethernet card AFTER the initial installation
>is over. BTW, the initial installation cliamed to "find" my ethernet
>card just fine. It even loads up NET3 and all the other goodies. It made
>the correct resolv.conf, hosts, etc. files and everything. I just
>need to find a way to add the devices and all to make the ethernet work.
>
>Does anyone have any tips or ideas?
Linuxconf.
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/vortex.html covers your nic.
You might need a new driver or som diagnstic-tools:
file://E:/http/cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/vortex-develop.html
ftp://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/linux/drivers/3c59x.c
ftp://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/linux/drivers/test/3c59x.c
Mvh Vidar Andresen
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Zeff)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Is there an easy way to change user password from desktop
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 01:29:02 GMT
lorax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In comp.os.linux.networking Tim Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>: I have a RH 5.2 (soon to be Mandrake 6.0) box and about 15 Win98 clients
>: that use it for Internet, Samba, etc. They all log into it using their
>: Linux username and passwd. What I would like is an easy way to have them
>: change their passwd from their own machine without having to log into Linux
>: thru telnet. They afraid of the command line and don't know what to do once
>: that $ is staring at them. Anyway, is there a utility or a script I could
>: run from a webpage that would allow them to use something other than
>: 'telnet' and 'passwd' to change their passwd. Thanks.
>
>
>
>I would suggest written a perl script to do through a browser, using .htaccess
>files to verify users.
There's a much easier way, if they're never going to log on "for
real:" make passwd their login shell.
--
Joe Zeff
The Guy With the Sideburns
If life is a journey, are we there yet?
http://www.lasfs.org http://home.earthlink.net/~sidebrnz
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
From: "Andrew J. Norman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: cheap ethernet card recognition ?
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 00:56:49 GMT
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
To answer your question go to:
http://www.physics.wm.edu/~norman/SOHOware/
I have information there on the SFA110A cards as well as a link to NDC's
drivers and the driver for the 2.0.xx kernel.
For the record these cards us a modified version of the DEC tulip driver
which NDC provided (this information is now public record on their web
site also)
Andrew J. Norman
______________________________________________________________
Dept. of Physics Phone:
College of William & Mary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"It is only with the heart that one can see rightly;
what is essential is invisible to the eye" -The Little Prince
______________________________________________________________
On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, David wrote:
> I am running Linux RedHat 5.2 on a K6 AMD 233 and I am looking for a
> module for a cheap ethernet card I bought.
> The card I would like my system to recognize is labelled "Soho Series"
> / Soho-PCI.
> Does anyone know if there is a module for this. ?
> If so, could you give some hints or URL's ?
> I guess I will have to recompile the kernel.
>
> Thanks for help
>
> David
>
>
>
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE=====
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBN7DKUSRqxyk0Hh01AQFIzQQAhzGNTu6HLBQgVhvnQpokkhvUdPVh0IA/
REfbpTGKVK5x+cfKSYqhD7b/yXXDyQ9Uhebk9o5stn+DLRbIf2rweGEPxc+n1GAX
asvLTaAUqCnph1JUzh2e+t7DRPZLgZ9C6HvdSVt2mh/OVgiov51aeqhOi8l6Nj9d
BxN4Wh1pASQ=
=+RCg
=====END PGP SIGNATURE=====
------------------------------
From: DavidHenderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Neighbour Table Overflow Message
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 19:57:25 -0500
I'm getting the following messages in my message log:
parport 0: detected irq7; use procfs to enable interupt-driven
operation
neighbour table overflow
If this info would help, we have a small LAN for our office, running RH
6.0 with Win 95/98 clients with Internet access via PPP. Using samba
for file server purposes & using IP Masquerading with 2 ipchains
commands, whether those commands are relevant to my problem or not I
don't know, but here they are:
ipchains -P forward DENY
ipchains -A forward -i ppp0 -j MASQ
Everything appears to work fine, except that we get quite a few of the
above messages throughout the day...PLEASE HELP!!
------------------------------
From: sham khalil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: smb.conf
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 09:07:12 +0800
Gary Ferrer wrote:
>
> Weird one I need help with. My RH5.2 linux box at work is setup the same as
> at home (same smb.conf). At work, I can access the linux box via network
> neighbourhood if I log into my win95 box with username and password for
> which there is an account on the linux box. At home I do the same thing but
> I cannot access any shares (password not accepted). The only difference is
> that at home I use Win 98. Any ideas?
> Thanks.
try encrypt passwords = yes
sham khalil
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 20:56:18 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba Shares
Hi Marc.
Post your /etc/smb.conf file so we can look it over.
Barry
p.s. Also, if you have access to comp.protocols.smb you may want to repost
there. You may get a better response there.
MW wrote:
> I've configured my samba (well, i hope)..but one thing doesn't work:
>
> i use win95 and suse 6.?, i have 4 partitions: one win-boot, one linux-boot
> and two data (FAT16)...and i want to public this two data drives in my LAN
> (little area network)...it works, but only the user who mounted them has
> write access and i don't need 8 GB of data only to look on...
------------------------------
From: QuestionExchange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: accessing mars-nwe using NET
Date: 10 Aug 1999 21:46:59 GMT
> Hello- I am running mars-nwe under RH6 and can't get access
> from clients running the NETX shell. Access from the same
> workstations using the client32 shell work fine. Here is my
> startnet.bat. and net.cfg - I am using an ne2000 compatible -
> any suggestions? startnet SET NWLANGUAGE=3DEnglish lsl.com
> n2000.com ipxodi.com netx.exe net.cfg Link Drive N2000
> INT 3 (it really is on IRQ3) PORT 300 (and really on 300)
> FRAME Ethernet_II (I am running Ethernet II on the server)
> Netware DOS Requester FIRST NETWORK DRIVE =3D F NETWARE
> PROTOCOL BIND Protocol IPX IPX SOCKETS 40 Any suggestions
> are greatly appreciated! -- YBIC, Kiyu Gabriel -------------
> ------------------------------- =93Every day millions of people
> wish for immortality who don't know what to do with themselves
> on a Sunday afternoon.=94 ;-)
First of all, is it so necessary to use netx? It's obsolete now
and has a lot of problems. So, try to use vlm, you can get it
freely available at ftp://ftp.novell.com But if you have to
use netx anyway, i need to know exactly what error message
gives netx in your case. Probably, it cant't find server? Then
check the server's frame type. Are you shure it's Ethernet_II?
(by default mars_nwe uses Ethernet_802.2). And tha last
suggestion: in your net.cfg there is a line "Link Drive N2000".
It should look like "Link Driver N2000", or is it just a
misprint? Good luck.
--
This answer is courtesy of QuestionExchange.com
http://www.questionexchange.com/servlet1/showUsenetGuest?ans_id=2497&cus_id=USENET&qtn_id=1598
------------------------------
From: "Graham Fountain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IPCHAINS Question
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 12:24:00 +1000
I have a problem setting up IPCHAINS. Before I go into detail of the
problem, the following diagram details how the machines are linked.
(Curse outlook express - it won't let me use fixed pitch while composing
this unless I use HTML, which I am sure would get me flamed big time - I
hope things line up enough to be understandable)
+----------+
| 1.1.1.1 | PC1 - Computer with ISDN link to internet "1.1.1.1" is a valid
internet address
+----------+
|
| PPP 33.6k link
|
+---------------+
| 1.1.1.2 | PC2 - Linux Computer acting as gateway to LAN - 1.1.1.2
is its ppp address
|192.168.1.1| 192.168.1.1 is its ethernet address
+---------------+
||
|| LAN - 192.168.1.0/24
||
+---------------+
|192.168.1.2| PC3 - This is the computer I am trying to reach.
+---------------+
OK. PC2 currently has in its ipchains a set of masquerading rules:
ipchains -A forward -s 192.168.1.0/24 -j MASQ
The policy of the Chain forward is DENY
That is working no problems - all the PC's on the 192.168.1.0/24 LAN can
access the net without any hassles.
I have an application on PC3 that I need to telnet to (on port 9999) from
PC1. PC3 also needs to be able to initiate a connection to PC1 - this is
working through the masquerade. Basically what I was planning on doing was
setting up IPCHAINS on PC2 so that any connections made to 1.1.1.2 port 9999
from 1.1.1.1 would be redirected to 192.168.1.2 port 9999. This way PC1
would think it is connecting to PC2, but PC3 would get the connection.
I tried the following:
ipchains -A input -p TCP -s 1.1.1.1/32 9999 -d 1.1.1.2/32 9999 -j REDIRECT
192.168.1.2 9999
This is giving me errors just saying to use ipchains -h or ipchains --help.
I have tried the ipchains howto, and I can't work out much from it - it has
lots of help for blocking access to the local machine but can't find
anything that helps with sort of thing.
I would greatly appreciate any help that anyone can offer on this. Are
there any better resources than the ipchains howto on how to use some of its
features?
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 22:24:14 -0400
From: peter holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.solaris
Subject: Re: Networking with Solaris...need help please
MegaSurge wrote:
> Hello, I recently obtained a copy of Solaris 7 and installed it on an
> x86 machine I have. It seems to work great however I have two problems
> (so far).
>
> First, I the machine has an Intel EtherExpress Pro 10+ ISA ethernet card
> which says it's supported on the hcl. During installation the card
> detected, was configured and seemed to work great. After the initial
> reboot of the system which occurs after install the card ceased to
> work. I come from a linux world and am giving Solaris a try on one of
> my machines. My problem is that I can't get the card to redetect
> again. Has anyone had problems with this card?
When given the option (somewhere in the startup mess), do a
b -r
to get the system to reconfigure itself.
> If an online reference or perhaps a book could be of assistance for this
> kind of translation please let me know. Any and all resources in this
> event will be appreciated.
The entire Sun Answerbook (which tells you MUCH more than you ever
wanted to know about setting up a network) is available at:
http://docs.sun.com:80/ab2
Alternately, take a look at:
http://www.sunhelp.com
------------------------------
From: Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IPchains...one internal host deny
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 21:27:14 -0500
I want to deny one internal host to reach specific IP address. I read
HOTO for ipchains but I really have no idea how to do this.
I would appreciate any help
Marek
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Post)
Subject: Re: linux problems - LAN ipmasqed by linux box to cable modem, also linux
locking up (??!!)
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 02:07:30 GMT
On Tue, 10 Aug 1999 22:54:31 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Conover) wrote:
-snip-
>Before I started doing any of this cable modem business, I'd been having
>problems with sendmail, httpd (apache), and smbd (samba) having problems on
>boot. I looked in the logs and they seem to be having problems resolving the
>hostname. Well the hostname is linux133, which is associated with 192.168.0.1
>in my hosts file, and that IP is tied to eth0 (my first ethernet card).
What does your hosts.conf file look like? It should be something like:
order hosts, bind
multi on
>Everything is set up ok hardware-wise...which means the RJ-45 is in the hub
>and the hub is turned on. Well I can't remember exactly, but I can't
>seem to remember having problems with my LAN running correctly even with these
>boot problems (back when I was masqing behind that dial-up connection).
>
>So the other day I got a cable modem. I figured I needed to fix this
>sendmail/httpd/smbd problem once and for all, so I started messing around with
>/etc/sysconfig/network and the if-whatever files in that folder. Well these
>programs were still having trouble booting, so i just set my machine's
>hostname to localhost (obviously not a good long-term solution on a LAN).
In my copy of hosts (Slackware 4.0) is the comment:
By the way, Arnt Gulbrandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says that 127.0.0.1
should NEVER be named with the name of the machine. It causes problems for
some (stupid) programs, irc and reputedly talk. :^)
If this is true, it may break other things...
I'm
-snip-
>Next problem. I want to ipmasq with the cable modem now. So I went out and
>bought another ethernet card, put it in my linux box, booted up, and viola
>there's eth1. So I stuck the static "internet" ip, @home's gateway, DNS,
>domain suffix, hostname, etc etc in for the eth1 setttings. eth0 is of course
>the gateway device for my LAN (it has 192.168.0.1 assigned to it, my other
>computers are 192.168.0.2 .3 .4, etc).
I might be reading your note incorrectly, but you should set up your other
computers to use the 192.168.0.1 address as their gateway. You should have
a script that issues (along with a lot of other setup stuff) the following
commands:
/sbin/route add -net ${NETWORK} netmask ${NETMASK} eth1
/sbin/route add default gw ${GATEWAY} netmask 0.0.0.0 metric 1
where ${NETWORK} is your IP address ANDed with your netmask, and ${NETMASK}
is the netmask given you by your cable modem provider. The ${GATEWAY}, of
course, would be the address of the gateway given you by your provider.
In general, I would need the following to start really debugging your
problem:
The contents of the following files:
host.conf
hosts
networks
resolv.conf
rc.inet1 (or whatever RH uses to configure the NICs, etc.)
The output from these commands:
route -F
ifconfig
Posted and emailed.
To send me email, replace 'nospam' with 'home'.
------------------------------
From: Warren Whitney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Installing 3C509 Card - Debian 2.1 - Problem
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 21:30:03 -0400
Vidar Andresen wrote:
> Try without the offending parameter then... That is try with only
> irq=10 value.
>
Thanks, this is the suggestion that worked! Thanks also to all who replied.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
