Linux-Networking Digest #185, Volume #12 Wed, 11 Aug 99 01:13:45 EDT
Contents:
Re: Sygate 3.0 ("James Stone")
linux problems - LAN ipmasqed by linux box to cable modem, also linux locking up
(??!!) (Steve Conover)
Re: symbolic link not work in ftpd (Lindoze 2000)
Errors SIOCADDRT and TIOCSER (RA)
Displaying X on an IP Masq'd machine ("Sunil P. Khatri")
IP Masq problem (I think)... (speedy)
ethernet "hub-card" (Paul Lew)
Re: Pump it up ! (Ian Wilson)
what NIC + Hub do you pros use? (Lindoze 2000)
Re: routing problem with 3 NICs (Abdullah Ramazanoglu)
Re: cheap ethernet card recognition ? (Abdullah Ramazanoglu)
Re: Will I ever be able to use Linux at all?? HELP! (MegaSurge)
can someone help with ppp please ("Joe Bloggs")
Re: @Home Mail and News Server settings for Netscape (Al Fasoldt)
Re: HELP...Neighbour Table Overflow ERROR (Clifford Kite)
Re: mac address ("Gregory D. Horne")
Re: port forwarding (Adrian)
Re: routing problem with 3 NICs ("Amanda Cheung")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "James Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sygate 3.0
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 02:24:01 GMT
Shawn Smith wrote in message <7opojn$k77$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Anybody know if Sygate 3.0 is Linux-compatible?
>
>Thanx, Shawn
>
>
I have got Sygate running on my home network on a host PC running Win 98
that is hooked to the Lan and a cable modem via 2 nics. I had a little
trouble configuring the Linux machines DNS but was able to manually point it
in the right direction using linuxconf. I have complete cable modem access
with all 4 machines while using only one IP from cable modem operator. If
you have any specific questions about the setup or configuration feel free
to contact me.
James
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Conover)
Subject: linux problems - LAN ipmasqed by linux box to cable modem, also linux locking
up (??!!)
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 22:54:31 GMT
Hi all,
1st things 1st, I'm running RH 5.2/P133/2 Netgear FA100TX cards/Cable
modem/48mb RAM/2.1gb HD...
Ok I had my network successfully set up before to ipmasq a PPP connection. I
had a couple of NT boxes running on the LAN (192.168.0.).
Now I'm having lots of problems, and I'm only a few light months experienced
at Linux, so hopefully some kind soul can give me a couple pointers. I'll
kinda do this in chronological order.
Before I started doing any of this cable modem business, I'd been having
problems with sendmail, httpd (apache), and smbd (samba) having problems on
boot. I looked in the logs and they seem to be having problems resolving the
hostname. Well the hostname is linux133, which is associated with 192.168.0.1
in my hosts file, and that IP is tied to eth0 (my first ethernet card).
Everything is set up ok hardware-wise...which means the RJ-45 is in the hub
and the hub is turned on. Well I can't remember exactly, but I can't
seem to remember having problems with my LAN running correctly even with these
boot problems (back when I was masqing behind that dial-up connection).
So the other day I got a cable modem. I figured I needed to fix this
sendmail/httpd/smbd problem once and for all, so I started messing around with
/etc/sysconfig/network and the if-whatever files in that folder. Well these
programs were still having trouble booting, so i just set my machine's
hostname to localhost (obviously not a good long-term solution on a LAN). I'm
kinda at my wit's end with trying to get these programs to load with something
other than localhost as the hostname.. I figure the problem will be obvious to
someone out here.
Next problem. I want to ipmasq with the cable modem now. So I went out and
bought another ethernet card, put it in my linux box, booted up, and viola
there's eth1. So I stuck the static "internet" ip, @home's gateway, DNS,
domain suffix, hostname, etc etc in for the eth1 setttings. eth0 is of course
the gateway device for my LAN (it has 192.168.0.1 assigned to it, my other
computers are 192.168.0.2 .3 .4, etc). Well I can't even ping another
computer on my LAN (yes the oter computers are set up correctly with ip and
gateway info and RJ-45s plugged into my 10/100 hub). When I try to ping to
the internet, like to @home's default gateway ip, I get some kind of message
like "host unreachable" that loops. But when I ping another IP on my LAN it
just doesn't do anything, like my computer just flat out can't find the
network (which I suspect is the case).
If this were windows (I know windows networking a lot better, but let's say I
didn't) I'd probably do something like rebuild. But this is linux and I
shouldn't have to do that. OH YEAH and on top of that Linux is now locking up
intermittently, which tells me something is REALLY wrong...
I read all the HOWTO's...I own the O'reilly books...still lost at sea.
Got no LAN much less an ipmasqing linux box. Help!
Thanks,
Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] --> take out the nospam.
------------------------------
From: Lindoze 2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: symbolic link not work in ftpd
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 23:24:44 -0400
I also had that problem and permissions is not the problem.
Jan-Albert van Ree wrote:
>
> Mars schreef:
> >
> > I'm running RH 6.0 and I want to make a vfat partition available for
> > ftpd. So I make a symbolic link /mnt/dos to /home/ftp/pub/dos. It
> > doesn't work while cd to that directory. I also try making a symbolic
> > link /mnt/cdrom to /home/ftp/pub/cdrom and it fails too. It seems I
> > cannot use other filesystem for ftpd. Am I missing anything?
>
> Have you checked the permissions for the link and the files?
> --
> Jan-Albert "Sliver" van Ree | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 3D Sims Archive maintainer | http://www.3dgamers.com
--
Thank you for your valuable input. Your useful answers will benifit
other users as well.
You are Linux!
########################################################
## ##
## My Experiment ##
## http://www.FusionPlant.com ##
## ##
########################################################
------------------------------
From: RA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Errors SIOCADDRT and TIOCSER
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 15:13:24 -0700
Just something I came across after building 2.2.10 kernel.
The error messages come up only during boot. I was wondering
if somebody might have an idea. The actual mesgs are:
SIOCADDRT : Invalid argument
TIOCSER ? ioctl obsolete, ignored
Thanks for reading this.
--
RA
------------------------------
From: "Sunil P. Khatri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Displaying X on an IP Masq'd machine
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 03:01:50 GMT
Folks,
I have successfully installed IP Masquerading on my home linux box.
The configuration is as shown below:
_______ _______
192.168.0.3-------| | | |
| | | Local |
192.168.0.2-------| HUB |------------------| GW |---------
local machines | | 192.168.0.1 | | w.x.y.z
192.168.0.4-------|_______| |_______|
There are several local machines (192.168.0.x). The local gateway is
connected by cable modem, and has address 192.168.0.1 (local part) and
w.x.y.z (the address given by the cable modem company). All machines
are Linux machines.
Now 192.168.0.2 wants to run an X application on a server a.b.c.d, and
have the results displayed on 192.168.0.2:0.0
Since 192.168.0.x are local addresses according the local network naming
conventions, there could be other 192.168.0.x's out there. How would the
X application know that it is _my_ 192.168.0.2:0.0 that it should send
the
display data to?
My questions are:
1) Is there a way to achieve this (perhaps using ssh or another
program?).
2) Does the IP-Masq'ing code natively support this situation?
Perhaps I am missing something simple...
Thanks bunches,
Sunil
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (speedy)
Subject: IP Masq problem (I think)...
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 03:04:39 GMT
Hi,
I am having this problem. I am running Debian 2.1 (Kernel
2.2.10). IP Chains is installed. My home network is setup like this,
Server (Debian, IP Masq), then 3 other win98 computers all connecting
into the hub. I can get the server to dial out, and i can get webpage
from the win98 computers, check email, the works. But for some
reason, on a select few webpages, like www.forums.com and
www.bell-atl.com i cannot get ANYTHING from the win98 computers. It
requests it, but wont get past the ip masq box. But if i use lynx
from the server itself (at the console) i can get to those webpages
without a hiccup. ip chains has default entries in (to allow access
both ways). So it cannot be any of that. Please help me get this
problem fixed.
Thanks
speedy
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Lew)
Subject: ethernet "hub-card"
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 10 Aug 1999 16:33:18 -0800
I saw a "hub card" by USAflex (?) that has "5 ports" where
the "5th port" is strictly internal and only 4 ports are
available externally. The 4 ports may be configured "normal"
or as uplink ports individually by the controller which looks
like it is to be configured via software. The hub-card
was at Fry's for $29.95 and is only 10 mbps and pci.
Does anyone know if this card is configurable within Linux
or that the configuration will remain at the power off like
the settings are in nvram? Or if there is a dual speed
version somewhere? It sounds ideal for me when DSL arrives
in my area soon/anytime....Didn't see any website for the
manufacturer or what chipset to be used; didn't notice any
drivers for linux but did see some stuff for solaris.
Any other company make something like this? It looks like
ideal as a "2nd card".
------------------------------
From: Ian Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Pump it up !
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 21:51:58 +0100
Whats the problem with pump?
I use it on Token Ring with no problems
pump -i tr0
I imagine Helena can just
login as root or su root
cd directoryWherePumpRPMis
rpm -i pump*.rpm (I remember "-i for install" more easily than -Uvh)
pump -i eth0 (no message means it worked)
ifconfig eth0 (just to confirm all is OK)
Mohd H Misnan wrote:
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >news:37aa5db9.8876934@news-server...
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I recently installed RH 6.0 on my machine and that took my only 90
> >> minutes, but I have been trying to get my cablemodem (roadrunner, La
> >> Jolla) to work for 6 hrs without success.
> >>
> >> I dowloaded Phil Karn's rrlogin.c. I also downloaded the new pump
> >> from ftp://update.redhat.com. However, I have no idea on how to run
> >> rpm to update my DHCP client. Could someone please run a step by step
> >> tutorial on how to install a working DHCP client for for RH 6.0 box ?
> >> How do I verify that DHCP actually works? Thank-you everyone.
> >>
> >> Helena
> >>
> >> PS. I did RTFM the How-Tos but alas without well...:-)
>
> Get rid of pump and use dhcpcd instead. If you've the RH 6.0 CDROM, install the
> dhcpcd-1.3.17pl2-1.i386.rpm and replace all instances of calling 'pump' inside
> your /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts to call 'dhcpcd' instead.
>
> --
> |Mohd Hamid Misnan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> |iMac/233RevB/MacOS 8.6 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> |AMDK6-2/300/Linux2.2.10 | http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/3319/ |
> -Smokey the Bear says strip mining prevents forest fires.
--
Ian Wilson.
------------------------------
From: Lindoze 2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: what NIC + Hub do you pros use?
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 23:10:18 -0400
What 100BaseT Network Interface Card and 100BaseT Hub do you pros use?
--
Thank you for your valuable input. Your useful answers will benifit
other users as well.
You are Linux!
########################################################
## ##
## My Experiment ##
## http://www.FusionPlant.com ##
## ##
########################################################
------------------------------
From: Abdullah Ramazanoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: routing problem with 3 NICs
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 03:07:49 +0300
Amanda Cheung wrote:
>
> I have a RedHat6.0 DNS server with 3 NIC, one to the internet, one to our
> web/email servers (sub-class C network) and the other to our private
> network. All interfaces come up fine and I've enable ip_forward already.
> I also put
>
> ipchains -P forward DENY
> ipchains -A forward -s 192.168.1.0/24 -j MASQ
I have used ipfwadm but have no experience in ipchains. Nevertheless it
seems that you disabled forwarding as a policy, except packets coming
from private network. Naturally all the rest (including server subnet)
are denied for forwarding. I would suggest either enable forwarding
policy or, if it is not suitable to you, then explicitly enable
forwarding of packets coming from / going to server subnet (w/o masq).
HTH
--
Abdullah Ramazanoglu [ aramazanoglu AT demirbank DOT com DOT tr ]
------------------------------
From: Abdullah Ramazanoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: cheap ethernet card recognition ?
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 02:49:01 +0300
David wrote:
>
> I am running Linux RedHat 5.2 on a K6 AMD 233 and I am looking for a
> module for a cheap ethernet card I bought.
> The card I would like my system to recognize is labelled "Soho Series"
> / Soho-PCI.
> Does anyone know if there is a module for this. ?
> If so, could you give some hints or URL's ?
> I guess I will have to recompile the kernel.
I have heard about SOHO cards driven by latest tulip driver. You might
check it as well. URL is
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/tulip.html
--
Abdullah Ramazanoglu [ aramazanoglu AT demirbank DOT com DOT tr ]
------------------------------
From: MegaSurge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Will I ever be able to use Linux at all?? HELP!
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 23:38:39 GMT
Well, I currently use SuSE 6.1 same as you it looks like, but I disable
that yast crap right away. As a matter of fact any and all of the
distros I have used and use I always disable their little utilities and
I rarely use gui controls to setup anything beyond the initial setup at
least. I find that the only thing those controls and helping tools do
for you is keep you in the dark as to what you really are doing with
your system. If you want to be in the dark then I would assume you
would've stayed with microsoft os.
Anyway, here's what I do to get my ppp connection and it's one thing
that has never failed me in any distro.
1. Goto the /etc/ppp directory. If it doesn't exist then create one.
If it does then mv all files in that directory to filename.old (or
whatever way you want to back up your original config files).
2. Use vi and create a new file called options. Put the following in
this file:
mru 1500
-detach
crtscts
modem
noipdefault
defaultroute
Save the file and exit.
3. Use vi again and create a file called ppp-on. Put the following
line in this file:
pppd /dev/cua1 115200 connect "" ATDT(place dial-up number here with no
spaces or dashes) CONNECT '\c' ogin: (username) word: (password)
Save the file and exit. Make the file executable by all and read by
root only (chmod 755 filename). The username and password should be of
course whatever your username and password are for your ISP. Also some
things to note are:
cua0 = com1
cua1 = com2
cua2 = com3
cua3 = com4
Some ISP's may use something different instead of login and password so
the ogin: and word: indicated above may be different. The above is
fairly normal however and is a safe bet.
Also, one other thing. If you are using some config tool to set up your
local ip, netmask etc, just user the following as a default unless you
are on a network.
-Hostname can be anything you want and is your computer's name.
-Domain name doesn't matter when using ppp so you can set it to
whatever.
-Specify your local ip as 1.1.1.1 unless you actually have a nic or a
network, in which case you should probably use the 192.168.x.x
addressing scheme indicated by internic as private address for a class C
network.
-Gateway and Netmask can be made to be 255.255.255.0. This is standard
and normal for the netmask, although the gateway can sometimes be
different though it shouldn't matter for a straight ppp connection.
-You want to specify that you are using a nameserver (DNS) and will need
to get the DNS IP from your ISP. Put the IP address for the nameserver
in the appropriate place.
Now as root you should be able to execute the ppp-on file and then your
modem will establish a ppp connection. In order to allow your users or
user accounts to use ppp you have to set suid (chmod 4755 chat) the chat
program located in /sbin I believe. Do this after you successfully made
connection to the net as root. Normally, however you do not want to
connect as root and therefore should allow user accounts to use ppp and
create a standard user account for yourself if you haven't already.
Oh and one other tip. Goto /etc and edit inetd.conf. Put a # sign in
front of the ftp line which comments out the ftp service. Unless you
plan on using ftp on your dial-up connection you don't really want it
active. Just some helpful advice.
Hope this helps.
Nevyn wrote:
>
> #Ugh.. I've never used suse before.. but I have tried KPPP and never once
> has it worked for me. I usually just use the red-hat control panel (which
> I know you won't have) but linuxconf may have the item you want.. sorry I
> can't be of too much help in your particular distribution.. also you might
> try using the command-line version of ppp.. all I can say is that I don't
> personally know anyone who has made KPPP work correctly.#
>
> lol...i've never got anythink BUT kppp to connect to the internet for me
> from linux, but i do have one intresting irritation, resolv.conf keeps
> dissapearing, i sometimes have to su o root and rewrite it, ok its only a 4
> line file but it gets annoying, any ideas y?
--
"If there is a quintessential zone of human privacy it is the mind."
===============================================================================
|MegaSurge |aka PolarBear |
|ICQ#: 2908964 |AOL Messenger Name: megasurg |
|http://www.setec-astronomy.org |PGP Public Key listed on pgp.keys.net|
===============================================================================
------------------------------
From: "Joe Bloggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: can someone help with ppp please
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 13:23:09 +0100
I have SuSE linux 6.1, i am quite new to linux, but not to computers. I have
a toshiba laptop 490XCDT (if there are known problems) and i use a pcmcia
card 336. Running in the console i use minicom to connect to my isp and then
try enter my login and pass, it connects and it gets to the rubbish it
prints, then i try and run pppd, i have tried in 2 seperate v-terminals, or
in the same one. It does nothin, and i am left with NO CARRIER, im not sure
if the kernel has ppp support compiled in, and i dont know how to find out.
If anyone can shed any light on this it will be much appricieated.
{XS}
------------------------------
From: Al Fasoldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: @Home Mail and News Server settings for Netscape
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 20:46:25 -0400
The IP addresses aren't likely to change often, but your caution is a good
one.
"Stuart R. Fuller" wrote:
> Louie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> : An easier method is simply to use the correct IP addresses instead of
> : "mail" and "news" in the server entries.
> :
>
> That's fine until the addresses change. The names will not likely change,
> though.
>
> Stu
--
Al
Al Fasoldt
http://www.dreamscape.com/afasoldt (tips, reviews, essays)
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: HELP...Neighbour Table Overflow ERROR
Date: 10 Aug 1999 19:57:42 -0500
DavidHenderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I'm getting the following messages in my message log:
: parport 0: detected irq7; use procfs to enable interupt-driven
: operation
This looks like a reference to configuring a parallel printer for IRQ 7.
Check linux/Documentation/parport.txt .
Parallel printers don't really need an IRQ though. I've disabled the
printer IRQ in the BIOS and have an extra interrupt for other purposes.
: neighbour table overflow
Don't know what this is about.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* My confidence in this answer (X), on a scale of 1 to 10:
|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----X----|
0----1----2----3----4----5----6----7----8----9----10 */
------------------------------
From: "Gregory D. Horne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: mac address
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 00:50:37 -0400
Roger wrote:
> Under linux how would you get the hardware address(mac address) of the
> ethernet card your using, besides looking on the card itself.
>
> Thanks...
Use the ifconfig utility when logged in as the root user or after typing
su and the root password at a terminal prompt.
Easy as falling off a log in the river.
------------------------------
From: Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: port forwarding
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 01:40:22 -0300
Kind of an annoyance for me to set it up - I really want to try IPCHAINS for
this.
at least just to see if I can do it -
part of my problem lies with apps like ICQ - but I may just set up a socks
server - I don't have that many client machines to worry about.
I haven't tested your command yet - but maybe I'm not reading it right
--destination-port 21 ?
you don't mean to actually type "--destination-port 21"
Doesn't this just duplicate "-d ipaddressfirewall/32 " only now more specific
- wouldn't "-d ipaddressfirewall/32 21" be the same and eliminate that?
and with "ipchains -A -p tcp " what rule am I appending this too?
ie: should it be "ipchains -A forward -p tcp"?
and isn't the -J lowercase? for jump to target
if I am reading your post right then the following command is the one I want:
ipchains -A forward -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 22.22.22.10/32 21 -j MASQ
I don't know if this will forward the port to the specific machine for me -
ie - port 21 on a always forwards to port 21 on b.
If I am a little or way off base here with how I am reading your command
please let me know.
Thanks (from a guy who should be asleep right now)
Adrian
(oh yeah the email addy isn't real if people tried to reach me thru it)
Juergen Pabel wrote:
> i guess you could use
>
> ipchains -A -p tcp -s 0/0 -d ipaddressfirewall/32 --destination-port 21
> -J MASQ
>
> assuming all traffic from your private net is masq'ed going out i would
> think this works,
> but haven't tested it. by the way: what's wrong with ipautofw? ever
> looked into ipportfw
> (need ipmasqadm for this)??
>
> jp
>
> Adrian wrote:
> >
> > I want to take packets sent from outside my network to x port on my
> > firewall and forward them to x port on a machine behind it.
> > slack 4.0 kernel 2.2.10 - ipforwarding and masq on
> >
> > using the ipchains command I can forward packets from x port on my
> > firewall machine to y port on my firewall machine - I'm sure there must
> > be a way to send them to my internal machine.
> >
> > ipautofw does it - but I don't want to set it up on my machine
> > ipautofw -A -r tcp 21 -h 192.168.1.5
> >
> > All I want to know is what is the equivalent syntax for ipchains - or
> > can I not do it at all and have to change how I have setup my machine.
> > Thanks
> > /C
------------------------------
From: "Amanda Cheung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: routing problem with 3 NICs
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:56:46 +0800
Amanda Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7op130$58r$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have a RedHat6.0 DNS server with 3 NIC, one to the internet, one to our
> web/email servers (sub-class C network) and the other to our private
> network. All interfaces come up fine and I've enable ip_forward already.
> I also put
>
> ipchains -P forward DENY
> ipchains -A forward -s 192.168.1.0/24 -j MASQ
>
> making our private network sees the outside world. No other ipchains
> commands added.
>
> 223.15.133.126 is the router to our ISP
> 223.15.133.120 (eth0) is the interface to the internet
> 223.15.133.62 (eth2) is the interface to our server-subnetwork
> 192.168.1.80 (eth1) is the interface to the private network
>
> My routing table looks like this,
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
> Iface
> 192.168.1.80 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
> eth1
> 223.15.133.62 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
> eth2
> 223.15.133.120 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
> eth0
> 223.15.133.64 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.192 U 0 0 0
> eth0
> 223.15.133.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.192 U 0 0 0
> eth2
> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
> eth1
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0
lo
> 0.0.0.0 223.15.133.126 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
> eth0
>
> 192.168.1.0 network can access the outside world. I have a machine
connected
> to eth2 with ip 223.15.133.5, it can ping eth0 of the DNS server but not
the
> outside world and visa vesa.
>
> What have I missed? How do I make our server-subnetwork sees the outside
> world ?
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Mandy
>
>
I also tried adding,
ipchains -A forward -s $server-ip -j ACCEPT
ipchains -A forward -d $server-ip -j ACCEPT
but they don't help. Is there something wrong with my routing table?
Mandy
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
