Linux-Networking Digest #199, Volume #12 Thu, 12 Aug 99 07:13:53 EDT
Contents:
routing (David Hopkins)
Re: PPP module errors (Robert Wessels)
Re: 3c900B card support? (Funny Guy)
unsupported? pcmcia card dec21143 chip?? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: PPTP or IPSec Liunx VPN (Derek Shaw)
firewall security? ("Patrick Leung")
Re: Can Linux "see" Win95 drive/folders? How? (Jon Sundquist)
Re: network neightborhood for linux? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: using setserial to change irq on serial port (Jan Cernohorsky)
Q: X.21 and E1 interface boards ? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Modem current connection rate? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lag time and Telnet/FTP (M. Rice)
Re: Lag time and Telnet/FTP (Vilmos Soti)
Re: enabling DHCP? (Darren Hole)
Re: Lag time and Telnet/FTP (Ketil Froyn)
Problem with kppp after RH6 install ("Jo Knight")
Challenging Problem: TCP/IP slow in one direction ("Seth" together.net>)
Kostenabrechnung der Internetnutzung f�r Intranet ("Lars Grenzend�rfer")
Re: Can I see who is connecting?? ("Seth" together.net>)
samba help (Yap Chen Kuang)
JavaVM for Linux-netscape (Florian Lorenzen)
Re: This is really bugging me.: ("Seth" together.net>)
IP forwarding (Braam)
Re: Linux Printing to a Remote Printer (Alexander Atkin)
Re: PPP module errors ("Seth" together.net>)
Re: PPP can't get remote IP address ("Ferdinand V. Mendoza")
Re: Linux and MS Proxy (DHobbs)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: David Hopkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: routing
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:37:25 -0400
We have a Cisco router connected to the Internet (Cox)-216.54.1.41
(255.255.255.248). I am setting up RH Linux 5.2 to use as a
firewall/proxy for our LAN. One card in the Linux machine is
216.54.1.42 (mask is 255.255.255.248)--eth0. This card is directly
connected to the router. The other card is 192.168.1.1 (255.255.255.0
mask)--eth1. This card is connected to a hub. eth0 is a 3c509 and eth1
is a 3c509b--PnP disabled; both cards show up fine on boot & are listed
correctly with ifconfig. IP forwarding has been enabled. I cannot ping
out from this machine or
any other on the network. What should my routing table look like? Any
input is welcome and very much appreciated--Thanks--DaveH.
David Hopkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Robert Wessels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP module errors
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 06:58:37 GMT
This can only meen that there is a module missing in the kernel!! Try to
find the missing module and insmod this one first and then the ppp.o.
Wei-shi Tsai wrote:
> I recently upgraded my kernel from 2.2.6 to 2.2.10. However, my PPP
> module now refuses to load. When I attempt to load the module manually,
> this list of errors occur:
>
> perdita:/lib/modules/2.2.10/net# insmod ppp.o
> ppp.o: unresolved symbol slhc_init
> ppp.o: unresolved symbol slhc_free
> ppp.o: unresolved symbol slhc_uncompress
> ppp.o: unresolved symbol slhc_toss
> ppp.o: unresolved symbol slhc_remember
> ppp.o: unresolved symbol slhc_compress
> perdita:/lib/modules/2.2.10/net#
>
> Any help on this is appreciated.
> --
> Wei-shi Tsai
> Cymbeline on #descent, Kahn, and ICQ(UIN:2801023)
> The Lost Material Defender Page:
> http://www.crosswinds.net/dallas/~perdita/index.html
> MoonieCode(1.8.11):
> SM:5+ F:sMe++>Mo+>:vZo<Bl+>:aLu+Ry+:pClR2 D:sMa<:vBe-Wi-> X:a0s|35d++
> O:d+:s?:?o?:a--:h--- P:a+:s6:w-:f?:eBrD:hBkm:t-:cAs:y---:r+|
--
!!get linux and live happy and prosper!!
_ _
| | | |
_ __ ___ | |__ ___ _ __| |_
| '__|/ _ \| '_ \ / _ | '__| __|
| | | (_) | |_) | __| | | |_
|_| \___/|_.__/ \___|_| \__|
------------------------------
From: Funny Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,alt.os.linux,alt.os.linux.mandrake
Subject: Re: 3c900B card support?
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 15:14:25 +0800
If you are using 3c9xx NIC, it work on Linux very well. I'm not sure what kind
of sound card you're using. I recommend you should remove the NIC to make sure
the sound card is working with Linux driver.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/11/99
> at 11:41 PM, "Derek R. Dreyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >Does the 3c900B ethernet card work with Linux? I've been told that any
> >major 3Com card should be ok with linux, and this was one of two options
> >given by Dell (the other was the 3c905C I think). I just ordered one
> >with my new PC, but I also noticed it's not listed on any of the
> >Linux-compatible lists of ethernet cards.
>
> I'm using it now when I boot Linux. My only problem is that there is some
> kind of conflict between it and my soundcard (Genius Sound Maker) which I
> haven't resolved yet. The upshot is no sound but I get onto the network
> ok.
>
> (If anyone knows how to resolve this particular pnp problem - not pnp
> problems _in general_ but this specific one -, boy, I'd welcome a hand, by
> direct mail.)
>
> F.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Felmon John Davis
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Union College / Schenectady, NY
> - insert standard doxastic disclaimers -
> OS/2 - ma kauft koi katz em sack
> -----------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: unsupported? pcmcia card dec21143 chip??
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 07:54:57 GMT
hi
may the force be with you...
i'm looking for info about HOWTO get an unsupported pcmcia card going...
mitec laptop, amd366, 64 mb.
intel 82365 pcmcia controller.
lancard "card bus 10/100Mb"
after enabling in dos and loadlin , i get the message>
cs: unsupported card type detected.
...
cs: unable to map card memory
cardmgr(57): unsupported card in socket1
cardmgr(57) : no product info available
heres the info i have:
mac adress 00 a0 0c 90 59 ef
i think(?) its maybe a DEC21143 chip ???
two questions:
is there a dec21143 chip, and how to get the card going ???
and second, more basic:
i know there is a possibility somewhere to match mac-adress to
manufacturer. just couldn't find it.
anybody know the url, or where to look for it ?
thanks
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Derek Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPTP or IPSec Liunx VPN
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 07:07:41 GMT
check out ftp://ftp.rubyriver.com/pub/jhardin/masquerade/ip_masq_vpn.html
and
ftp://ftp.rubyriver.com/pub/jhardin/masquerade/VPN-howto/VPN-Masquerade.html
Cheers!
d.
Willis Sarka III wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am aware of PoPToP PPTP server for Linux, but am unaware of any IPSec server.
>Is there any info out there of an IPSec server for Virtual Private Networking? The
>reason I ask is because more and more of the employees at work are signing up for
>ADSL, and would like to access our LAN over the Internet. Any pointers to web pages
>or docs is much appreciated!
>
> Thanks in advance,
--
Derek Shaw
Business Information Systems
Victoria, BC.
voice: 250-885-2021 fax: 250-386-4060
------------------------------
From: "Patrick Leung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: firewall security?
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 15:56:51 +0800
Hi,
I am using 'ipwadm' to configure the linux machine as a firewall and proxy
server. Does anyone know is it secure enough to protect my internal network?
the configuration is like this:
ipfwadm -F -a masquerade -S 192.9.X.X/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0
Thanks
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 02:40:34 -0400
From: Jon Sundquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Can Linux "see" Win95 drive/folders? How?
Michael Ward wrote:
>
> With Samba I have been able to make my W95 box "see" the Linux box
> (folders, sub-f, files), but how do you get the Linux machine to see
> drives/folders/files on the W95 machine?? I have tried everything I can
> think of/read about. Many thanks for any suggestions.
Make sure that you log into Win95 as the same name as a user on you
linux box, and that the the win95 workgroup name (see identification
under control panel -> network) is the same as the work group that you
have named in the samba configuration file. You'll only be able to see
the directories that you say are readable in the configuration file,
plus the home directory of the username you logged into the win95 box
with.
Jon S.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: network neightborhood for linux?
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 07:35:31 GMT
Hi Tero.
Yeah, it would be nice wouldn't it? Lucky us. There is.
Definite must have tool if you do use Samba .. it's called TkSmb.
Be warned. You can "download" shares and it's automatically saved in
your /tmp directory. And you can't upload files. Use smbmount for that.
Enjoy ... http://www.rt.mipt.ru/frtk/ivan/TkSmb or retrieve it from a
Linuxberg site somewhere.
I even have a link "nn" to TkSmb *grin*
Bye-bye
Ricardo
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Jan Cernohorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: using setserial to change irq on serial port
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 08:30:51 GMT
Abdullah Ramazanoglu wrote:
> Jan Cernohorsky wrote:
> >
> > I have a SuSE 6.2 Linux installation on a dual processor PII 300 box.
The
> > modem is ISA and on COM3. In the standard setting the irq on the port
in
> > question would like to be irq 4. It needs to be 5. I have tried to use
> >
> > setserial /dev/ttyS2 irq 5
> >
> > (as root), but it comes back with
> > "Operation not permitted"
>
> Could it be because /dev/ttyS2 is in use by some other process? See if
> "setserial /dev/ttyS3" works. "ps axw | grep tty" or "ls /var/lock"
> could help.
> --
> Abdullah Ramazanoglu [ aramazanoglu AT demirbank DOT com DOT tr ]
Thank you for your response. No it is not in use. setserial only fails
when I actually try to (re)set something (like irq), not when it is only
probing. It even fails in this way when invoked during the boot process
through /etc/rc.d/serial . Checking the process table like you suggested
confirms that the port is not busy. It IS the right port, since I can dail
out through it with minicom, but is is very very painfully slow, which
suggest an irq clash.
Many thanks, JanC
================== Posted via CNET Linux Help ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Q: X.21 and E1 interface boards ?
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 08:45:19 GMT
Hi !
Currently specifying a system where there is a need for synchronous
X.21, 64 kbps and E1, 2.048 Mbps, G.703 interface boards.
The system behaves as a TDM multiplexer connecting 7 bits of each
timeslot from E1 frame structure into X.21, 64 kbps data interfaces. The
X.21 data interface must support HDLC framing.
I would like to have information about board vendors.
TIA,
Markku
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Modem current connection rate?
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 08:36:01 GMT
Hi,
I would like to monitor my modem's connection rate to my ISP. How can I
fetch the current connection rate? The modem changes its speed as shown
on the front LCD display after the connection has been made. I would
like to poll the modem after fixed intervals and get the current rate
it is connected at?
It is connected to my Linux box which runs cmu SNMP package. Is it
possible to get this rate thru snmpget? What would be the OID?
Thanks,
Khurram.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: M. Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Lag time and Telnet/FTP
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 07:08:30 GMT
Semi-newbie question:
I have successfully connected my nt workstation and redhat linux box
together in an isolated network. When I connect with http, apache
serves up the page immediatly. When I connect with ftp or telnet, the
socket connects but then it takes 60-120 seconds for me to get a login
prompt. I've looked through documentation, but it is a difficult
concept to search for.
any ideas?
thanks a lot!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Vilmos Soti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Lag time and Telnet/FTP
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 09:04:12 GMT
"M. Rice" wrote:
>
> Semi-newbie question:
>
> I have successfully connected my nt workstation and redhat linux box
> together in an isolated network. When I connect with http, apache
> serves up the page immediatly. When I connect with ftp or telnet, the
> socket connects but then it takes 60-120 seconds for me to get a login
> prompt. I've looked through documentation, but it is a difficult
> concept to search for.
>
> any ideas?
>
> thanks a lot!
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
It seems somewhere there is a timeout for ftp and telnet but not for
Apache. How is your password checking set up? Do you have NIS?
Good Luck, Vilmos
--
Have you recompiled your kernel today?
------------------------------
From: Darren Hole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: enabling DHCP?
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 09:25:58 +0000
I used linuxconf to setup my second nic (local lan). I think it would
work just as well for etho0 (adapter 1)
colin wrote:
> newbie question...
> I didn't configure networking support during the Redhat install.
> How do I enable my NIC as a DHCP client? It's a PCMCIA ethernet card.
> It shows up in ifconfig as eth0 I think...
>
> regards,
>
> COlin
--
Darren Hole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux-Mandrake 6.0 Celeron 450a/128megs
------------------------------
From: Ketil Froyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Lag time and Telnet/FTP
Date: 12 Aug 1999 11:40:32 +0200
Vilmos Soti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Semi-newbie question:
> >
> > I have successfully connected my nt workstation and redhat linux box
> > together in an isolated network. When I connect with http, apache
> > serves up the page immediatly. When I connect with ftp or telnet, the
> > socket connects but then it takes 60-120 seconds for me to get a login
> > prompt. I've looked through documentation, but it is a difficult
> > concept to search for.
> >
> > any ideas?
It could be a DNS lookup problem, ftp and telnet wait for the DNS
timeout before they give a prompt. Solution is to either set up a DNS,
or simply put all your machine's addresses in the linuxbox's
/etc/hosts file, with some nice names.
Ketil Froyn
--
The angle of the dangle is proportional to the heat of the meat.
http://www.ifi.uio.no/~ketilf/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Jo Knight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problem with kppp after RH6 install
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 10:29:43 +0100
Hi,
Can anyone help me on this small problem. I have just upgraded to RH6 from
RH5.2. Using kppp under RH5.2 worked fine, I could dial up my ISP using my
normal account (not root). After upgrading to RH6 when I try to connect I
get the following error message:
'pppd not installed properly - the pppd binary must be installed with the
SUID bit set'
kppp works fine when I use root to connect with, but I understand that it is
not advisable to be connected to the net as root. So i need to know what I
need to change so I can get connected using any normal account.
Any help is appreciated.
Jo - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Seth" <smanley< no spam >together.net>
Subject: Challenging Problem: TCP/IP slow in one direction
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 05:55:33 -0400
I've been chasing this problem around for several days now, and I'm hoping
someone else has seen this (although deja.com didn't turn up any matches in
the past archives). Here's the scenario:
Host A ---->Internet----->ISP--> 56K frame relay ----->Cisco
Router------->(Ethernet) --> FTP/web server --->firewall ---> Host B
The FTP/web server is Red Hat Linux 6.0, straight out of the box. Host A
(any OS) can upload to the FTP server at the expected 3 to 5KBps. However,
Host A can not download from the FTP server at an acceptable rate, which is
typically anywhere from 1.4KBps (tops) to 0.3 KBps or even not at all
(disconnection's happen frequently). Http from the FTP/web server to Host A
is also very slow.
Host B is a dual boot Linux / NT 4.0 (sp5) machine. When operating as an NT
box, FTP to Host A (or any other machine on the Internet side) works just
fine (4 to 5 KBps) in Both directions. When operating as the RH6 Linux
personality, it exhibits the same exact behavior as the FTP server when
connecting to the internet over the frame relay circuit. Also, any
connections between Host A (either OS) and the FTP server are blazingly
fast.
I captured the output from a 'tcpdump' on the FTP server while doing both an
FTP 'put' (file size ~13K) and a 'get' from a host dialed into the Internet.
After analyzing the results, the big difference was that the Linux FTP
server sent packets out of order (using tcp window ?) and had to re-transmit
many times, whereas the remote host sent packets methodically (never sent
more than two at a time before waiting for a reply) while doing the 'put'.
How can I make Linux's TCP/IP stack work better? I have tried adjusting the
'window' and 'mss' parameters of the route to the gateway with no luck.
Maybe I had the wrong params? (tried mss's ranging from 128 to 360 with
window's of 2, 4 and 8 times the mss value)
Anyone care to take a stab?
Seth
------------------------------
From: "Lars Grenzend�rfer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Kostenabrechnung der Internetnutzung f�r Intranet
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 20:43:34 +0200
Ich habe eine Linux-Server laufen, der das Intranet mit dem Internet �ber
ein Modem (per dial on demand) verbindet. Gibt es eine M�glichkeit die
Verbindung mit dem Internet (bzw. meinem Provider) zu protokollieren? Da ich
die ganzen Internetkosten habe, m�chte ich sie auf diejenigen verteilen, die
das Internet nutzen. Ich mu� wissen, wann wer f�r wie lange im Internet war,
um eine Kostenabrechnung zu erstellen. Das Protokoll sollte nicht unbedingt
weitere Daten enthalten, da es ansonsten un�bersichtlich werden w�rde. Gibt
es Software die dies bew�ltigt? Falls ja, wo kann ich sie finden und wie
konfiguriert man sie?
Danke.
Lars
------------------------------
From: "Seth" <smanley< no spam >together.net>
Subject: Re: Can I see who is connecting??
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 06:27:13 -0400
Also, for more detail, you could look at tcpdump.
------------------------------
From: Yap Chen Kuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: samba help
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 18:24:37 +0800
I have samba up and running but a few clients
have trouble connecting.
One Win95 client thinks it's the server. When
I ping the server's hostname it reports that
it's pinging the client's IP number. It won't
ping any other names but it pings IP numbers ok.
It says access denied at login but I can see the share.
I can see the troublemaker from the server and it seems
to be set up okay.
The funny thing is the other machines have no problems.
Any ideas?
------------------------------
From: Florian Lorenzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: JavaVM for Linux-netscape
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 11:28:05 +0100
Hi,
Where do I get a JavaVM for Netscape running on RH 5.2? I'd like to use
some JavaApplets but there seems no VM installed.
I didn't find anything on Netscape's web-ste and on Sun's either.
If somebody knows a more appropriate NG, please tell.
Thanks in advance,
Florian
------------------------------
From: "Seth" <smanley< no spam >together.net>
Subject: Re: This is really bugging me.:
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 06:49:47 -0400
Can you ping the NT Nic from the cisco router if you login to the cisco via
telnet? I have seen a *static* arp entry give problems before. I would
double check the ethernet address of the NT nic, then see if it matches what
the router has.
Also, does the router have any sort of firewalling capability that could be
turned on?
Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7otk8m$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Thanks Gert.
> The NT routing table looks exactly than the one you typed here. And the NT
> has IP forwarding enable.
>
> Adding some data to the same problem:
>
> I put another system (even windows 95) in the same net where the
> cisco router is.
> Now, hosts in the internal networks can ping the windows 95 computer, but
> still can't ping the cisco. Again, it is like the cisco router
> is ignoring any packet if the packet comes from the NT when such packet
was
> originated by an internal host.
> But the cisco works if the packet was originated by the NT itself.(no by
an
> internal host)
> At first sight you could think: Got it! It's the cisco! It's broken or not
> properly setup!.
> But the problem is that this same cisco router is working with another NT
> server, that has the same configuration than the new one I'm trying to
build
> now. More, this cisco router, and this NT (the old one) are our current
> router, and Firewall respectively in our company since many months ago.
>
>
------------------------------
From: Braam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: IP forwarding
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:38:23 +0200
Hi all
Thanks for the help on IP forwarding.
It s working great now.
Regards
Braam Greyling
------------------------------
From: Alexander Atkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux Printing to a Remote Printer
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 11:47:22 +0100
The network broadcast address is: 128.1.255.255 is this going to cause a
problem with a machine address of 128.1.0.255?
I wouldnt have thought so but im no expert on TCP/IP or any other network
protocols.
Thankyou.
Alex.
Gustin Kiffney wrote:
> I don't think you want your print server to use x.x.x.255 for its
> address as that is the broadcast address for your subnet. You might
> be able to get away with it but it's not really the thing to do.
>
> On the remote printing, I'd check the following sections from
> http://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/Printing-HOWTO
>
> 7.2. File Permissions
> By popular demand, I include below a listing of the permissions on
> interesting files on my system. There are a number of better ways to
> do this, ideally using only SGID binaries and not making everything
> SUID root, but this is how my system came out of the box, and it works
> for me. (Quite frankly, if your vendor can't even ship a working lpd
> you're in for a rough ride). -r-sr-sr-x 1 root lp
> /usr/bin/lpr*
> -r-sr-sr-x 1 root lp /usr/bin/lprm*
> -rwxr--r-- 1 root root /usr/sbin/lpd*
> -r-xr-sr-x 1 root lp /usr/sbin/lpc*
> drwxrwxr-x 4 root lp /var/spool/lpd/
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root lp /var/spool/lpd/lp/
>
> If you're not sure how to get these permissions set, play with the
> 'stat', 'chmod', and 'chown' commands.
>
> 11.1. To a Unix/lpd host
> To allow remote machines to print to your printer, you must list the
> machines in /etc/hosts.equiv or /etc/hosts.lpd. (Note that
> hosts.equiv has a host of other effects; be sure you know what you are
> doing if you list any machine there). You can allow only certain
> users on the other machines to print to your printer by usign the rs
> attribute; read the lpd man page for information on this.
>
> You might have to send a HUP to the lpd process, like this
> kill -HUP `pidof lpd`
> or do 'ps aux', find the PID (number) associated with lpd
> and then do
> kill -HUP [pidnumber of lpd]
> That tells lpd to reread your configuration files which it might
> not do once it's been started.
>
> Another thing, it is kind of a waste of space to post MIME-versions
> of your emails to Usenet. Check your newsreader and turn the
> MIME - stuff off when you post here. Good luck and you might
> help others by posting what you found to be the solution.
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Alexander Atkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --------------D9C9A1DE1F7358FB98D6AB76
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >
> > Here is the printcap entries for the Printer Server:
> >
> > # apsfilter setup Wed Jul 28 16:49:47 GMT 1999
> > #
> > # APS_BASEDIR:/usr/lib/apsfilter
> > #
> > #
> > ascii|lp1|stcolor-a4-ascii-mono|stcolor ascii mono:\
> > :lp=/dev/lp1:\
> > :sd=/var/spool/lpd/stcolor-a4-ascii-mono:\
> > :lf=/var/spool/lpd/stcolor-a4-ascii-mono/log:\
> > :af=/var/spool/lpd/stcolor-a4-ascii-mono/acct:\
> > :if=/usr/lib/apsfilter/filter/aps-stcolor-a4-ascii-mono:\
> > :mx#0:\
> > :sh:
> > #
> > lp2|stcolor-a4-auto-mono|stcolor auto mono:\
> > :lp=/dev/lp1:\
> > :sd=/var/spool/lpd/stcolor-a4-auto-mono:\
> > :lf=/var/spool/lpd/stcolor-a4-auto-mono/log:\
> > :af=/var/spool/lpd/stcolor-a4-auto-mono/acct:\
> > :if=/usr/lib/apsfilter/filter/aps-stcolor-a4-auto-mono:\
> > :mx#0:\
> > :sh:
>
> > The printcap file on the machine im trying to print from is:
> >
> > # Remote LasterJet IIp
> > lp|lj|laser:\
> > :sd=/var/spool/lpd/lj:\
> > :rm=Printer:\
> > :rp=lp7:\
> > :lp=/dev/null:\
> > :sh:
> >
> > I made the directory /var/spool/lpd/lj and currently it has chmod 666.
> >
> > Here is my hosts file for ALL the Linux computers on the network:
> >
> > # For loopbacking.
> > 127.0.0.1 localhost
> > 128.1.0.1 Router Router.lowtech.net
> > 128.1.0.2 Files Files.lowtech.net
> > 128.1.0.3 003 003.lowtech.net
> > 128.1.0.255 Printer Printer.lowtech.net
> > # End of hosts.
> >
> > Here is the hosts.lpd file from the Printer Server:
> >
> > 128.1.0.3 003 003.lowtech.net
> >
> > I have not finished this yet as I have only been trying to get this
> one
> > machine printing before going mad.
> >
> > This works fine when printing via Samba (all the Win95 comps can print
> > perfectly) or just standard LPD (the printer server can print files
> spooled
> > from itself).
> >
> > However when I try to send a file from another Linux computer it just
> say
> > "Waiting for queue to be enabled on Printer".
> > Printer is of course the Printer Server and is defined in hosts.
> >
> > I am also getting the message "Printer: lpd: raw: Your host does not
> have
> > line printer access".
> > Why?
> >
> >
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Seth" <smanley< no spam >together.net>
Subject: Re: PPP module errors
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 06:12:26 -0400
Try looking in /lib/modules/preferred (or 2.2.10) for a file named
'modules.dep'. this should get generated at bootup by the scripts in
/etc/rc.d. Look for the a line that will show what module(s) the ppp.o
module depends on. Then try loading that module(s) before loading ppp.o
(use 'insmod <module-name>.o'). if the modules aren't there, you may have
to re-compile the kernel. Don't forget to do
make modules
make modules_install
after building the kernel. This will put the *.o files in
/lib/modules/2.2.10 (overwriting anything that is there, I'll warn you;)
Wei-shi Tsai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I recently upgraded my kernel from 2.2.6 to 2.2.10. However, my PPP
> module now refuses to load. When I attempt to load the module manually,
> this list of errors occur:
>
> perdita:/lib/modules/2.2.10/net# insmod ppp.o
> ppp.o: unresolved symbol slhc_init
> ppp.o: unresolved symbol slhc_free
> ppp.o: unresolved symbol slhc_uncompress
> ppp.o: unresolved symbol slhc_toss
> ppp.o: unresolved symbol slhc_remember
> ppp.o: unresolved symbol slhc_compress
> perdita:/lib/modules/2.2.10/net#
>
> Any help on this is appreciated.
> --
> Wei-shi Tsai
> Cymbeline on #descent, Kahn, and ICQ(UIN:2801023)
> The Lost Material Defender Page:
> http://www.crosswinds.net/dallas/~perdita/index.html
> MoonieCode(1.8.11):
> SM:5+ F:sMe++>Mo+>:vZo<Bl+>:aLu+Ry+:pClR2 D:sMa<:vBe-Wi-> X:a0s|35d++
> O:d+:s?:?o?:a--:h--- P:a+:s6:w-:f?:eBrD:hBkm:t-:cAs:y---:r+|
------------------------------
From: "Ferdinand V. Mendoza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP can't get remote IP address
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 14:58:42 +0400
Try this in your options file:
noipdefault
regards,
Ferdinand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm having trouble getting PPP to work with a new ISP. PPP works fine
> with my main ISP, and I'm trying to do things the same way, but for some
> reason it doesn't work.
>
> When I connect, PPP authenticates then dies. Looking through the
> log shows that I get my own IP address, but that I can't grab the
> remote gateway IP address.
>
> I'm using SuSE on a laptop, and I have the networking for the pcmcia
> card turned off. Again, it works fine with my main ISP.
> (Unfortunately, I'm on the road, and I need a local dialup for a couple
> of weeks -- I'm going through linux withdrawal here.)
>
> Does anyone know what I could check?
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: DHobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,microsoft.public.backoffice.smallbiz
Subject: Re: Linux and MS Proxy
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 07:33:38 -0400
DistressedCanadian wrote:
>
> How do you run IPCHAINS?
>
> * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
> The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
http://jgo.local.net/LinuxGuide/linux-ip-masq.html
I've got a couple WIN boxes going through a Linux box with the Linux box
as the firewall.
Dan
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
