Linux-Networking Digest #260, Volume #12 Tue, 17 Aug 99 18:13:39 EDT
Contents:
Re: Setting up a Network in Linux for Win95 ("Kerry J. Cox")
Installing a driver (Peter Johnson)
General Network Question (Chris Wells)
Re: masquerade two networks? (Julian Tibble)
load average: 20.00, .... (Ricardo Malta Cenit AG)
mount AIX directory to Linux (Eric)
Re: Home network problems revisited ("Phil")
Home network problems revisited ("Steven D. Nakhla")
SMC EtherPower II (epic100 drivers), PnP, & reboots (Sean Turner)
Re: masquerade two networks? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Strange login problem (Chris Zimmerman)
problem with wu-ftpd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: networking problem: SuSE 6.1 + YaST ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
How can I insert a header in proxied Web pages? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: test ("Frederik Meerwaldt")
Problem "beyond the ability" of redhat support =) -- telnet and redhat 6.0 ("Carlos
Martin del Campo")
Can LInux and NT talk ("Vasanth")
Re: PPP and DNS problem ("Scott M. Stookey")
Re: DNS+multidomain+one IP
Re: 2 computer network (Monte Phillips)
Re: EXTREMELY CHEAP erotic phone chat 86724 (dmalcolm)
Exchange server clone for Linux? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Does linux support this internal modem (Xiaohu Li)
Re: Can LInux and NT talk (dmalcolm)
Re: Networking two RedHat 5.2 machines?
Re: How to set up Multihomed Linux (dmalcolm)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Kerry J. Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Setting up a Network in Linux for Win95
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 14:28:53 -0600
What exactly are you trying to accomplish? If you simply want to run Linux
as a file server (much like I do), you can install and run samba. It's all
ready to go if you are running RH 6.0. Just go to /etc/smb.conf and make
the changes for your WORKGROUP and for what ip domains you want to access
it. Now kill and restart samba, "/etc/rc.d./init.d/smb restart"
Once that is done, it becomes a simple matter of setting up the printers
either on the Win95 box or the Linux box.
Questions, drop me a line.
KJ
--
.-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-.
| Kerry J. Cox Vyzynz International Inc. |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems Administrator |
| (801) 596-7795 x101 http://www.vii.com |
| ICQ# 37681165 http://quasi.vii.com/linux/ |
`-------------------------------------------------------'
Omega wrote:
> How do I setup Linux RH 6.0 so that it can network to a Win95 machine and
> vise versa?
>
> Thank You
> Omega
------------------------------
From: Peter Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Installing a driver
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 20:06:22 +0000
I have finally figured out what has plagued my ethernet card for so
long. It seems that the older pci bus I have can only handle 16bit
words and my ethernet card/driver are set for 32bit. So I went into the
driver and commented out the line for IO_LONG as the instructions on the
driver web site. The problem is after I compile it with the options at
the end of the driver file and replace the old ne2k-pci.o with the newly
compiled ne2k-pci.o I get two unresolved symbol errors.
/lib/modules/2.2.9-19mdk/net/ne2k-pci.o: unresolved symbol
init_etherdev_Rd9e75361
/lib/modules/2.2.9-19mdk/net/ne2k-pci.o: unresolved symbol
unregister_netdev_R19c80e01
Do I have to total recompile the kernel or is there some step that I am
missing. The driver compiles without errors or warnings and I had hoped
I could just swap the new and old driver.
I am running mandrake 6.0 on a 486 100Mhz pentium.
Thanks for any suggestions. PJ
------------------------------
From: Chris Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: General Network Question
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 16:15:06 -0400
I know that this is a general networking question and not linux specific
but I am trying to network linux boxes. :)
I recently got a 3Com Corebuilder 3500 layer 3 switch/router and have a
few questions. First of all I am trying to break up a corp network into
4 subnets and am using the following addressing scheme.
subnet 1: 10.0.0.0/24
subnet 2: 10.0.1.0/24
subnet 3: 10.0.2.0/24
subnet 4: 10.0.3.0/24
Each of the subnets is going to occupy a single router port. I setup a
VLAN (I'm new to VLANs and don't fully understand them) for each subnet
and assigned ip addresses to each router interface in the following
manner:
router port 1: 10.0.0.254/24 - subnet 1
router port 2: 10.0.1.254/24 - subnet 2
router port 3: 10.0.2.254/24 - subnet 3
router port 4: 10.0.3.254/24 - subnet 4
This is where I get confused. For testing purposes I connected a PC
directly to a given router port and assign it an address in that
network, for example:
PC1: 10.0.0.2/24 ::CONNECTED DIRECTLY TO:: router port 1: 10.0.0.254/24
PC2: 10.0.1.2/24 ::CONNECTED DIRECTLY TO:: router port 2: 10.0.1.254/24
I am unable to ping any router ports or PC1 from PC2.
Question 1: Does this setup make sense?
Question 2: I plan on just doing static routing since this is an
internal network with only 1 router, do I need any static routes? I'm
guesing no since I am not forwarding any packets to any other routers.
Questions 3: Why are VLANs necessary? What is their purpose?
Sorry for the long winded explanation but I wanted to be explicit and
thanks for any help.
Chris Wells
------------------------------
From: Julian Tibble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: masquerade two networks?
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 17:45:38 GMT
> (i.e. ipfwadm -F -a masq -S<network_B> -D0.0.0.0/0).
I thought the command should be:
ipfwadm -F -a m -S <network_B> -D 0.0.0.0/0
Does it matter whether you use 'm' or 'masq'?
Julian Tibble
------------------------------
From: Ricardo Malta Cenit AG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: load average: 20.00, ....
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 19:42:21 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've updated our NIS-Server to SuSE-6.1 and now I am having many problem
with the load.
I'm using ypserv 1.3.7
I /var/log/messages I get the information that ypserv has too many
children
Aug 17 19:25:01 nissrv ypserv[10210]: WARNING: ypserv has to many
running children !
In the ps list I can see about 20 ypserv processes. The load explodes up
to 20.
After a while it goes down back.
--
MfG
Ricardo Malta Phone : (+49)-89-382-47423
Cenit AG Systemhaus Fax : (+49)-89-829-209-99
Paul-Gerhardt-Allee 48 Work : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
D-81245 Muenchen Home : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==============================================================================
Real programmers don't comment their code.
It was hard to write, it should be hard to understand.
------------------------------
From: Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: redhat.config,redhat.networking.general
Subject: mount AIX directory to Linux
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 19:30:50 GMT
Is it possible to mount an AIX directory to a directory on a Redhat 5.2
machine? What steps do I need to take to get this setup correctly.
Thanks
Eric
================== Posted via CNET Linux Help ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: "Phil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.linux,alt.solaris.x86,comp.os.ms-windows.networking,microsoft.public.win98.networking
Subject: Re: Home network problems revisited
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 13:28:52 -0700
A few questions:
What OS are you using on both machines? Which one works?
Do you have the same netmask on both machines? (ifconfig - linux)
(ipconfig - win)
Can you ping between your machines?
Is your network completely functional between both machines?
Can you ping to an IP at your ISP? On the internet?
Do you have a nameserver entered? Same as the one that works?
Can you ping to a hostname at your ISP? On the internet?
Do you have a default gateway setup? Same as the one that works?
What do you get when you execute 'route'? (route - linux) ('route print' -
win)
Regards,
Phil
Steven D. Nakhla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:S6ju3.2431$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Okay, after spending 3 hours with the tecnical support people today, I
> managed to get a great deal of the problems with my network straightened
> out. Just to recap, I have a cable modem account and ordered another IP
> address so as to network 2 computers together.
>
> I am using a SOHOware 10/100 autosensinv 5-port hub. It has ports
numbered
> 1-5, as well as an uplink port to which the modem is connected. The
> computers are connected on ports 1 and 2, however only my computer (the
> original IP which came with the service) is able to connect to the
internet.
> The customer support people told me my account is flagged for multiple IP
> addresses, which means the problem lies with my computer setup/
>
> Could SOMEONE please tell me how to set this thing up! My computer is
able
> to connect through the hub to the internet. However, the other computer
is
> not. Could you please tell me anytthing I might need to know regarding
> cabling, setup, software, etc. ANYTHING!!!! PLEASE!!!!
>
>
> Please reply to:
> Steve Nakhla
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Steven D. Nakhla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.linux,alt.solaris.x86,comp.os.ms-windows.networking,microsoft.public.win98.networking
Subject: Home network problems revisited
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 19:55:30 GMT
Okay, after spending 3 hours with the tecnical support people today, I
managed to get a great deal of the problems with my network straightened
out. Just to recap, I have a cable modem account and ordered another IP
address so as to network 2 computers together.
I am using a SOHOware 10/100 autosensinv 5-port hub. It has ports numbered
1-5, as well as an uplink port to which the modem is connected. The
computers are connected on ports 1 and 2, however only my computer (the
original IP which came with the service) is able to connect to the internet.
The customer support people told me my account is flagged for multiple IP
addresses, which means the problem lies with my computer setup/
Could SOMEONE please tell me how to set this thing up! My computer is able
to connect through the hub to the internet. However, the other computer is
not. Could you please tell me anytthing I might need to know regarding
cabling, setup, software, etc. ANYTHING!!!! PLEASE!!!!
Please reply to:
Steve Nakhla
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Sean Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SMC EtherPower II (epic100 drivers), PnP, & reboots
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 18:59:45 GMT
Well I think I finally figured out why I couldn't get Linux networking to
work properly. I did about 20 re-installs thinking it was me, but as it turns
out it's thanks to MicroSquash (more about that at the end). Basically, I do
an install and sometimes the ethernet card would get initialized and sometimes
it wouldn't. I got pissed once and unplugged it (where I contemplated for a
second throwning the machine at the wall ;) and lo a behold it worked. But,
after rebooting into windows and then back into linux it didn't work anymore.
So I went hunting for the bootlog messages and sure enough I was getting an
error. So I went looking for information on the driver that I had installed
(one of the things it does during the driver install is print who wrote it and
where to get more info). After tracking the guy down I found a bunch of
information (http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/epic100.html). There are
new drivers out, but I haven't yet figured out how to make those work (I gotta
compile it, and then blah blah blah- since I'm new to all this I don't know how
to ;).
Has anybody got a later version of the epic100 than 1.0.4 compiled for the
2.2.5-15 kernel????
Is there some other way to solve this without comiling new drivers or turning
off the machine?
thanks
st
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: masquerade two networks?
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 19:46:20 GMT
The man page says -m but I don't think it matters. According to
ipfwadm -F -l it says it should accept and masquerade packets for
network "B" but when I do a ipfwadm -M -l it never shows any active
masquerades for network "B". I'm stumped.
Keith.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Julian Tibble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (i.e. ipfwadm -F -a masq -S<network_B> -D0.0.0.0/0).
>
> I thought the command should be:
>
> ipfwadm -F -a m -S <network_B> -D 0.0.0.0/0
>
> Does it matter whether you use 'm' or 'masq'?
>
> Julian Tibble
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Chris Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Strange login problem
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 13:19:14 -0500
I have a Slack 3.6 box with 2.2.10-ac12, and I am having a problem
logging in as anyone other than root. I use ssh2 for my remote
connectivity, and I had thought that my problem was limited to ssh, but
I cannot ftp into my machine either. If I ssh as root into this
machine, set the passwd for a regular user to something rediculously
simple, and then open an ftp connection and try to connect as that user,
I get a 'password incorrect' message. It would seem to me that once
this ftp problem is solved, my ssh problem will go away.
Any help is appreciated,
Chris Zimmerman
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: problem with wu-ftpd
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 20:00:00 GMT
I am running RH6.0 and using wu-ftpd. I was trying to run the server in
a chroot environment using the -r flag, with another stand alone server
on a higher port (3000). I was having problems getting both severs to
run correctly, and since this is now a production machine didn't have
time to keep that configuration and play with it. When I switched back
to the standard configuration for ftpd I find that users can login, but
cannot get a directory listing. Users can also cd around the directory
tree, but can't upload files. I am thinking that this is a problem with
my shared libs, I had to make copies of a few of them to get the server
running in the chroot environment. While I was moving them around I may
have misplaced one or more. Does anyone have a list of libs that wu
requires? Also any suggestions as to other causes to the problem would
be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
-Doug
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: networking problem: SuSE 6.1 + YaST
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 19:56:19 GMT
I was in exactly the same situation last week, and when I saw your
post here, I decided to wait and see if anyone answered you post.
Since noone answered it by Sunday, I went off to try and fix the
issue myself. I was able to figure out that the reason I could not
select the network base configuration item in the system
administration menu in yast was due to the fact that DHCP was enabled.
When DHCP is enabled, it is not possible to specify the network
configuration parameters. The method I used to disable DHCP was to
edit the rc.config file in the /etc/ directory, find the DHCLIENT
variable, and change the value to "no". I am sure that there is an
easier way to disable DHCP (probably within yast itself), but I know
my way works. Once DHCP is disabled, you will be able to select the
network base configuration in yast. Hope this helps.
In article <7otcg5$r8g$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, i'm a total newbie (2 days) and am trying to get my linux box to
> communicate with my win98 machine, so i can transfer files off the
win98
> machine...
>
> i have set up the network card (ip address, mask, driver) and it seems
to be
> functioning correctly...
>
> one really strange problem is that when i use yast, and try to get the
> system admin/network config/network base configuration menu, it is
white,
> and i cant select it... change host name, configure network services
are
> black, and i can select them, however the top selection is white, and
it
> wont let me select it!
>
> i have had the following suggestions whiuch have not worked:
>
> reinstalle suse using a different configuration:
> -tried this to no avail, tried the default config, network,
network
> +default, everything...
> after installing and removing hundreds of packages, the menu item
is
> still white!!
>
> enter a few lines in /etc/rc.d/rc:
> /sbin/ifconfig eth0 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
> /sbin/route add -net 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
>
> this did absolutely nothing, except now when i use ifconfig, my ip has
> changed to 10.0.0.1
>
> can anyone help? :)
>
> thanks in advance :))
>
> mark!
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How can I insert a header in proxied Web pages?
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 19:56:51 GMT
Hey all...
I'm trying to find a way to set up a proxy server
that will include a header at the top of every
Web page it returns to the client browser. I
need the header to be generated by a CGI program
on the fly, specific to each user (determining
for which user to generate a header is beyond the
scope of this question).
My server is running Linux 2.2.x, Apache 1.3.x,
and I'm currently trying to set the proxy up with
Squid (but I am certainly open to other
suggestions).
Thanks in advance for any help you can offer.
-Guy
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Frederik Meerwaldt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: test
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 11:54:58 +0200
Test successful. But please use alt.test instead.
Regards,
Freddy
=====================================================================
$ ON F$ERROR("LANGUAGE","ENGLISH","IN_MESSAGE").GT.F$ERROR("NORMAL") -
THEN EXCUSE/OBJECT=ME
=====================================================================
bran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7pa39q$1sf$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> testing
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Carlos Martin del Campo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problem "beyond the ability" of redhat support =) -- telnet and redhat 6.0
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 16:11:04 -0500
Hi,
I have setup my linux box and everything except telnet works ok.
When I do a telnet to my computer it actually opens and stablishes a
connection and i get to see in my terminal the contents of the issue.net
file, but i doesn't show me the log in prompt!!!! it gets stuck there and
later on closes my connection because of time out...
now, the PATH is ok: /bin
the login program is working all right too, i have tested it several times
the permissions in /bin/login are ok too.
i also tried telling telnet where login lives wit the "-D /bin/login"
option.
i called redhat support and they told me that this problem is "beyond their
ability" and refered me to this newsgroup... =) (no kidding!!!)
any ideas?
thanks!
Carlos
------------------------------
From: "Vasanth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Can LInux and NT talk
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 02:36:50 +0530
Hi!
Can someone tell me if you can map files/drives of NT on linux and
visce-versa and if so how.
Thanx
Vasanth
------------------------------
From: "Scott M. Stookey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP and DNS problem
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 16:08:32 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==============F5A092B9D0721293025CF9ED
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Karl Bradley wrote:
> Hi, hope someone can help. I've got a linux box that I use as a file and
> print server on a small network. (address 192.168.0.2). I also want to use
> the linux box to connect to the internet.
>
> Now my problem is this........I have connected to my ISP fine. pppd
> launches, I'm assigned an IP address and I can ping any ip address on the
> net. (my ISP won't give me their nameserver addresses so I'm running a
> cahing name server). If I use nslookup, it will give me all the correct
> details, but if I try and then ping that name (eg, www.yahoo.com) it says
> "ping: unknown host www.yahoo.com"
>
> I suspect that it may be something to do with my gateway address, in that I
> do not know what to set the gateway address on my linux box to.
>
> If I do traceroute, it says multiple interfaces using 192.168.0.2 @ eth0. I
> think that this may be the root of my problems, but have no idea how to
> rectify it.
>
> I really hope that someone out there can help me. I'm afraid that being a
> novice, I'm completely over my head here.
>
> Karl Bradley
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do a dig -x on your isp's domain name. You will get some interesting info from
there, including your ISP name servers!
--
NT makes the possible easy, and the impossible, impossible
LINUX makes the possible difficult, and the impossible, possible
Scott M. Stookey
==============F5A092B9D0721293025CF9ED
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Karl Bradley wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>Hi, hope someone can help. I've got a linux
box that I use as a file and
<br>print server on a small network. (address 192.168.0.2).
I also want to use
<br>the linux box to connect to the internet.
<p>Now my problem is this........I have connected to my ISP fine.
pppd
<br>launches, I'm assigned an IP address and I can ping any ip address
on the
<br>net. (my ISP won't give me their nameserver addresses so I'm
running a
<br>cahing name server). If I use nslookup, it will give me all the
correct
<br>details, but if I try and then ping that name (eg, www.yahoo.com) it
says
<br>"ping: unknown host www.yahoo.com"
<p>I suspect that it may be something to do with my gateway address, in
that I
<br>do not know what to set the gateway address on my linux box to.
<p>If I do traceroute, it says multiple interfaces using 192.168.0.2 @
eth0. I
<br>think that this may be the root of my problems, but have no idea how
to
<br>rectify it.
<p>I really hope that someone out there can help me. I'm afraid that
being a
<br>novice, I'm completely over my head here.
<p>Karl Bradley
<br>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</blockquote>
Do a dig -x on your isp's domain name. You will get some interesting
info from there, including your ISP name servers!
<pre>--
NT makes the possible easy, and the impossible, impossible
LINUX makes the possible difficult, and the impossible, possible
Scott M. Stookey</pre>
</html>
==============F5A092B9D0721293025CF9ED==
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Subject: Re: DNS+multidomain+one IP
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 21:02:01 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 17 Aug 1999 14:07:46 -0400, LeSauvage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have one valid (real) IP from a cable internet provider. But I wish to
>hosting many friend�s home pages, with separate domains.
>
>How I configure DNS (named) in order to have multiple domains
>(www.domain1.org, www.domain2.org, ...etc) with a unique IP (one server
>machine, in other words?)
You can attach as many A records to an IP address as you want. You may only
have one PTR record for any given address, however. Not a problem for most
applications, specifically yours. For example:
$ORIGIN domain1.net.
@ IN SOA @ root (
42 ; serial (d. adams)
3H ; refresh
15M ; retry
1W ; expiry
1D ) ; minimum
IN NS @
blah IN A 10.0.0.1
blee IN CNAME blah
blue IN CNAME blah
belch IN CNAME blah.domain2.net.
R. Marc
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Monte Phillips)
Subject: Re: 2 computer network
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 20:45:04 GMT
Go here. Step by Step in living color.
http://makeitsimple.com/how-to/dyi_crossover.htm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I am trying to hook 2 computers up in a network using cat5 cable and
>network cards. I am not using a network hub. Could someone please tell
>me which two wires on the network cable I need to cross.
------------------------------
From: dmalcolm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: EXTREMELY CHEAP erotic phone chat 86724
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 15:55:13 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============9C735A9EDF699745F1F6C725
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Want to talk with REAL horny girls?
>
> This is something VERY new in phone sex. The women on the line are NOT paid. They
>call for free phone sex with guys like YOU!
>
> Guys: 50 cents per minute
>
> Girls: TOTALLY FREE
>
> =====================>1-888-335-HOTT (toll-free)
>
> =====================>1-888-302-ORGY (toll-free) You can be billed discreetly
>directly to your phone bill.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> For gay talk call:
>
> 1-888-800-GUYS (toll-free)
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> For Dominance & Submission Call:
>
> 888-700-WHIP
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Zr+ffPP&
Try putting this crap in one of the news groups that are interested in this stuff.
Not Here Goof!
==============9C735A9EDF699745F1F6C725
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="dmalcolm.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for dmalcolm
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="dmalcolm.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Malcolm;Dan
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Software Engineer/SysAdmin
x-mozilla-cpt:;22208
fn:Dan Malcolm
end:vcard
==============9C735A9EDF699745F1F6C725==
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Exchange server clone for Linux?
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 21:27:50 GMT
I am curious if there exists a Microsoft Exchange
server "clone" for a Linux server so that one
could use Outlook on windows machines but Linux on
a server and have the "collaboration" that one
would have with a standard Outlook and Exchange
server setup?
=========
John
------------------------------
From: Xiaohu Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Does linux support this internal modem
Date: 17 Aug 1999 16:58:06 -0400
Hi, I have a Dell Dimension XPS T450 system which has an internal
modem-U.S.Robotics 56K V90 voice Win. I think it's a PCI modem.
Is this those "windows-only" modem? If not ( I certainly hope not ),
does linux support it?
If I cannot use it under linux, I plan to buy a new external modem.
please give me some recommendations. Would an added external modem
conflict with my old one in any way? My computer has both Windows 98
second edition and Red hat linux 6.0 on it.
If you can help me, please send me an email at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks a lot,
Xiaohu
------------------------------
From: dmalcolm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can LInux and NT talk
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 16:37:01 -0500
Vasanth wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Can someone tell me if you can map files/drives of NT on linux and
> visce-versa and if so how.
>
> Thanx
> Vasanth
Yes. You need to install Samba and configure it. Samba essentially
speaks NT networking over TCP/IP. It also comes with most Linux
distributions.
Dan Malcolm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Subject: Re: Networking two RedHat 5.2 machines?
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 19:50:26 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>What kind of hardware will I need? I want to go the easiest route, this
>will just be a home-based web server. And how do I go about setting it
>up on RH 5.2?
Read the Linux IP-Masq howto. This should put you on the right track.
http://linux-howto.com/LDP/HOWTO/mini/IP-Masquerade.html
If you've got a ppp connection and a LAN, you've got everything you need.
R. Marc
------------------------------
From: dmalcolm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to set up Multihomed Linux
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 16:24:02 -0500
Nuno Jonet wrote:
> Hi people
>
> I'm just another newbie to Linux, although I have some experience with
> TCP/IP networks with Windows(95/98/NT).
>
> I have two networks currently running NT Server. Here are the details:
>
> Net A - 192.168.10.0
> NT Server A - 192.168.10.15
> DHCP running (192.168.10.20-192.168.10.254)
> No WINS, No DNS
> LMHOSTS
>
> Net B - 192.168.20.0
> NT Server B - 192.168.20.15
> DHCP running (192.168.20.20-192.168.20.254)
> No WINS, No DNS
> LMHOSTS
>
> Some guy working with this set-up thought of multihoming both NT servers and
> connected them with a crossover cable... It works but is very slow and also
> very limited due to MS's "brilliant" network enginnering.
>
> What I would like to have are some suggestions on how to set up a multihomed
> Linux box to route the traffic.
> I've allready tried it, and even though PING worked across subnets, I
> couldn't see machines across subnets through Network Neighbourhood.
>
> Here's what I managed to do :
> Red Hat 5.2
> RTL8029 -> eth0 192.168.10.1
> 3COM 3c509 -> eth1 192.168.20.1
> IP forward is on
> Gateways on client machines are set to 192.168.*.1 for each correspondent
> subnet.
> Telnet is working from all subnets
> Ping goes across subnets
>
> Only Netbios networking seems to be failing.
>
> Once again, thanks in advance for any help at all that you can provide !!!
>
> Nuno
Look in /etc/services. You should find that ports 137 thru 139 need to be
enable through the firewall for both TCP and UDP.
Dan Malcolm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
