Linux-Networking Digest #299, Volume #12 Fri, 20 Aug 99 06:13:51 EDT
Contents:
Re: Home network and cable modem ("Matt Blair")
Qseeme, please help! (Bjoern Smith)
Re: eth0 and ppp0 networking on same machine ("Quiney, Philip (EXCHANGE:HAL02:HM10)")
ILS service on linux ? ("kasdali samir")
Missing glibc=2.1 !!! ("Gert R Lind")
Re: ip-masquerading (catsquotl)
Network Card on Deskpro 4000 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Faster Internet Connection ("Ted Pavlic")
Samba and NT4 SP3 ("Andreas Vester")
Re: DHCP and nameservers (s)
Really slow FTP transfers (Taso Hatzi)
Re: Who has diald working really?
Re: Why not C++ (David Schwartz)
[Q]: Modem acts up ("Alan M. Shih")
Re: route problem: Can't add gateway address (Sujatha Natraj)
problem with ndc ("Patrick M�ller")
Re: wysiwyg HTML editor for Linux (GCP)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Matt Blair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.linux,alt.solaris.x86,athome.users-general,athome.users-unix,athome.users-win95,cableinet.cable_modems,comp.os.ms-windows.networking
Subject: Re: Home network and cable modem
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 07:13:30 GMT
sorry .. made a typo .. you need to edit the file nsswitch.conf to read:
hosts: files dns
Matt
Matt Blair wrote in message ...
>You need to add the word "nameserver" infront of the listing for your DNS
>Servere in the /etc/resolv.conf for the DNS lookup to work properly. In
the
>etc/hosts file, you need to change the line that has hosts to
>hosts: files dns
>You also need to add the file defaultrouter to the /etc/ directory and just
>put in the gateway's IP address.
>to check on the fly if you can reach your gateway, type in the following:
>
># route add default my.gateway.ip.address
>
>This will do a 1 time gateway addition so that you can test out the
setting.
>If the route add default ... line does not work, then probably either your
>subnet mask is improperly set up or your NIC is not setup / working
>properly.
>
>
>Matt Blair
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>s wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>i dont know if u need a cross over cable between the hub and the up link
>>but i could be wrong try using a regulur calbe and make sure none of the
>>box have the same ip
>>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>and if u can pleas help me set up my at home i cant ping the gate way or
>>my DNS i have @home cable serves
>>
>>hi i have @home and cant ping my gate way 24.7.63.1 or my DNS
>>24.0.200.33 or 24.0.200.34
>>
>>netmask 24.0.200.33 or 24.0.200.34
>>my ip 24.7.63.1 I can ping my own ip but thats all
>>network card is up and running fine but ndc400 nic card retek chipset
>>RTL8029(AS)
>>
>>resolv.conf
>>domain stana1.occa.home.com
>>24.0.200.33
>>24.0.200.34
>>
>>
>>"my @home install data sheet"
>>
>>DHCP 24.1.8.70
>>dns 24.0.200.33 and 24.0.200.34
>>netmask 255.255.255.128
>>subdomian stana1.occa.home.com
>>broadcast "none"
>>ip 24.7.63.9
>>login schairez
>>dns name or computer name = CC1003148-A
>>mail server = mail
>>directory server = directory
>>news server =news
>>web Proxy server name http://proxy:8080
>>
>>help my pleas thanks a lot
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>hac wrote:
>>>
>>> Steven D. Nakhla wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I recently signed up for cable modem service. Now, we have 2
>computers, so
>>> > I ordered an extra IP address for the other, and attempted to setup a
>>> > network so the other computer could have access. The other computer
>uses
>>> > only Win98 and my computer uses Win98, Linux, and Solaris.
>>> >
>>> > I bought the Intel InBusiness 5-Port 10 Mbps hub for our network. I
>was
>>> > told to plug the cable modem into the uplink port on the hub.
However,
>the
>>> > hub doesn't have an uplink port. It has only 5 standard ethernet
>ports.
>>> > So, using a crossover cable, I plugged the cable modem into one of the
>>> > ports, and the other 2 computers into the next 2 ports. I am able to
>access
>>> > the internet through either computer. The problem is, I can't use
both
>at
>>> > the same time. Is this common? Whenever I try and access the
internet
>when
>>> > the other computer is on, I get network errors. How can I set it up
so
>that
>>> > both computers can access the internet at the same time?
>>> >
>>> > Could it be a problem with how I have the hub set up? Has anyone had
>>> > experience with this hub? I could REALLY use any help that you all
>could
>>> > give me in setting this up. Thanks!
>>> >
>>> There have been many reports of the MSO's failing to configure the
>>> modems to use two IP's at the same time. Your trouble sounds at lot
>>> like the other reports. Call and have them reconfigure the modem.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Howard Christeller Irvine, CA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 09:41:42 +0200
From: Bjoern Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Qseeme, please help!
Hi!
I'm having trouble getting qseeme (v0.83b) to work. The application
starts ok
but any connection I try is failing. My Linux 2.2.10 box is on a private
network and I
have a sync ISDN PPP connection to my ISP. I use ipchains to avoid
connections
from outside (is that the problem?).
I have all the masquerading stuff set up (works fine for other IP
services) and
the ip_masq_cuseeme kernel module is propery loaded.
I'm fairly experienced with Linux and IP networking but new to CuSeeMe.
1) Should I start qseeme with -l option? (what argument in that case)
2) Are there any specific IP port numbers that must be open for
connections
from outside?
Many thanks in advance for any kind of help,
--
Bj=F6rn Smith Compound Systems AB, phone +46 8 4464260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.compound.se
------------------------------
From: "Quiney, Philip (EXCHANGE:HAL02:HM10)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: eth0 and ppp0 networking on same machine
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 08:34:50 +0100
Hi there,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [root@derek /root]# ifconfig
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:20:AF:21:49:BC
> inet addr:192.168.1.10 Bcast:192.168.1.255
> Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:186 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> Interrupt:11 Base address:0x300
>
Can you ping the router itself? The fact that you have no Rx packets may
be due to some strange problem with your ethernet card.
If not then can you ping another machine on the network?
If so then you will need to check the firewall policy on the ip masq
router to see if you are allowed access - depends how this has been
configured it could be on a per machine basis.
HTH
Regards
Phil Q
--
Phil Quiney Digital PowerLine,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Nortel Networks,
Telephone: +44 (1279) 402363 London Rd, Harlow,
Fax: +44 (1279) 402885 Essex CM17 9NA,
United Kingdom.
"This message may contain information proprietary to Northern
Telecom so any unauthorised disclosure, copying or distribution
of its contents is strictly prohibited."
------------------------------
From: "kasdali samir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ILS service on linux ?
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 07:53:37 GMT
Hi.
I want in our Intranet to use Netmeeting.
In Microsoft architecture, Netmeeting use an LDAP service called ILS
(Internet Locator Service) to find all peaple connected actually to the
Network.
But my server is a Linux server and I want to know if I can find a service
like "ILS" running on LINUX.
Can someone give me a good site where I can find softwares to build an
Intranet with LINUX. I want services running on LINUX but with MS Windows NT
Workstation for the clients (Word,Outlook,Netmeeting,IE4 or Netscape)
Can some tell me if is there a good Mail server on LINUX that give a good
integration with MS OUTLOOK for the client side. (Not MS Outlook Express).
Many thanks in advance.
------------------------------
From: "Gert R Lind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux.caldera,alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.development.apps
Subject: Missing glibc=2.1 !!!
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 09:54:23 +0200
Where can I find this packet ?
If anyone got it will you please send it to me ??
Regards Gert R lind
------------------------------
From: catsquotl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ip-masquerading
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 12:06:57 +0200
George Georgakis wrote:
>
> dmalcolm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > catsquotl wrote:
> >
> > > hello there,
> > >
> > > I have a problem setting up ip masquerading.It`s probbably something
> > > small i am overlooking but I can`t figure out what.
> > >
> > > I have a linux box wich runs SuSE 6.0 kernel 2.0.36 setup as host.
> > > eth0 is setup as 192.168.1.1 connected with a coax-line to 192.186.1.2
> > > as the only other box in this LAN. Wich is running suse and windows
> > >
> > > eth1 is setup as 195.86.254.237 via a utp-cable to a cable-modem that
> is
> > > connected to my isp.
> > >
> > > I have all the kernel-stuf suggested in the ip-masq howto compiled in
> > > and ipfwadm as:
> > > ipfwadm -F -p deny
> > > ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.2/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0
> > >
> > > from x.x.x.2 I can ping both eth0 and eth1 from x.x.x.1 i can`t connect
> > > to the internet though..
> > >
> > > It might be the gateway setting wich for the x.1 box is the one my isp
> > > sent me and for x.2 is 192.168.1.1
> > > i`ve tried the one my isp sent but no luck
> > >
> > > can someone tell me what i`m doing wrong??
> > >
> > > from the suse 6.0 box i can connect to the internet no probs...
> > >
> > > greets eelco
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > It might be your 'ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.2/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0' line.
> > The '-D 0.0.0.0/0' resolves to a null address. Try changing it to
> > '192.168.1.1'.
> >
> > I am not that familiar with ipfwadm as I use ipfw and ipchains, but if
> that
> > still doesn't work try reversing the sequence of the rules.
> > Please let me know how it turned out.
> >
> > Dan
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sorry, but you're wrong, Dan. The 0.0.0.0/0 string is indeed correct. It
> stands for "everywhere". The problem is that eelco is trying to target an
> individual machine with the wrong mask. That is, instead of
>
> ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.2/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0
>
> (which translates as "masquerade the 192.168.1.2 network to anywhere" -
> doesn't look right , does it?) try
>
> ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0
> (which translates as "masquerade the 192.168.1.0 network to anywhere"), or
> else use
>
> ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.2/32 -D 0.0.0.0/0
>
> (which translates as "masquerade the 192.168.1.2 machine to anywhere"). The
> latter appears the line you want to use. The trailing numbers are
> important. Use /24 for a network address, and /32 for a single machine's
> address.
>
> Have fun
> George
hello,
thanks for your advise but eeeh,
stil no luck. i`ve tried both ways and all different gateways on the x.2
machine.
It will only set up routing using x.1 so that must be right.
It still will ping eth0 and eth1 but won`t reach annything else.....:(
anny help options or suggestions left????
greets eelco
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Network Card on Deskpro 4000
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 07:49:48 GMT
Hi,
I would like to install the network card on a Compaq Deskpro 4000.
This is a Compaq netelligent 10/100 TX Embedded UTP Controler. My linux
is RedHat 5.1.
Where can i find the driver and how can i install the driver ?
(Compilation, Configuration...)
Send me the reply on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Ted Pavlic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Faster Internet Connection
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 17:12:30 -0400
A consumer ISDN (2B+D) in my area varies from about $35 to $40 a month. A
dedicated ISDN (dual channel too) to most ISPs in the area is around
$175/month. A simple dial-up ISDN is about $35/month for both channels and
$19.95/month for one channel.
Cable Internet is about $40/month in my area. (One IP address -- it's about
$10/month for each additional IP address... HOWEVER, I just use NAT at home
and do IP masquerading. It works great for me -- I've got six machines all
on the net for the price of "one." :) )
ADSL should be neat when it comes out in my area. The local telephone
company was going to offer it for $60/month -- then that would replace your
normal telephone line. (It would have three channels --
voice/upstream/downstream) With deregulation as it is in my state, I should
be able to purchase an ADSL line from the telephone company for something
like $40/month (I'm guessing on that one) and then purchase Internet access
from a local ISP that supports ADSL. (Which really shouldn't be too tough as
long as they are digital coming in) I'm looking forward to it when it comes
out.
Of course, the big cost issues might be at the time of purchase of the ISDN
terminal adapter and the installation of the line. Monthly charges aren't
much -- but installation of cable/ADSL/ISDN (even if there isn't any
installation, the terminal adapter will cost a bit) are a bigger chunk at
one time, usually.
I hope that helps a little.
All the best --
Ted
David Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I need a faster internet connection. Cable modems will be available in
> my area in another year, but I don't really want to wait that long, plus
> I've heard some not great things about cable modems.
> Is ISDN the answer? Is it cost effective? How well does it work with
> Linux and which ISDN modems work best with Linux if any?
> Any imput in this area would be appreciated.
> Thanks,
> David
>
------------------------------
From: "Andreas Vester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba and NT4 SP3
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 23:12:19 +0200
Hi,
I've got a big problem. Since three days I tried to build up a network. I've
got two machines at home. On the machine works SuSE Linux 6.1 and on the
other Win NT4 SP3. I want the Linux machine to become a file server. I
installed and configured the samba package and at the NT machine I have
access to the shares from the Linux machine.
My first and main problem is that I don't have any write access although I
configured my smb.conf with "read only = no" and "writeable = yes". I tried
everything: Read the man pages, howtos, look for information in the net, but
nothing work...
My second problem is that I don't see the Linux machine in the NT network
neighborhood.
PLEASE HELP before I go crazy...
Thanks
Andi
P.S.: Antworten in Deutsch w�ren sehr willkommen !?!
------------------------------
From: s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DHCP and nameservers
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 07:01:23 GMT
hi i have @home and cant ping my gate way 24.7.63.1
netmask 24.0.200.33 or 24.0.200.34
my ip 24.7.63.1 I can ping my own ip but thats all
network card is up and running fine but ndc400 nic card retek chipset
RTL8029(AS)
resolv.conf
domain stana1.occa.home.com
24.0.200.33
24.0.200.34
cant help but tell me how u got that far
"my @home install data sheet"
DHCP 24.1.8.70
dns 24.0.200.33 and 24.0.200.34
netmask 255.255.255.128
subdomian stana1.occa.home.com
broadcast "none"
ip 24.7.63.9
login schairez
dns name or computer name = CC1003148-A
mail server = mail
directory server = directory
news server =news
web Proxy server name http://proxy:8080
help my pleas thanks a lot
Jonathan Pryor wrote:
>
> I'm trying to get DHCP working with Red Hat 6, and for the
> most part have succeeded -- the IP address for my adapter
> is getting set without my explicitly setting it. Quite nice.
>
> My problem is that even though the IP address is being set,
> the nameservers don't seem to be -- I'm unable to ping any
> other systems via DNS (though I can ping them if I know
> their IP address).
>
> I tried looking the the DHCP mini-howto, but it's information
> seemed to be geared toward previous versions of linux
> (pre 2.2 kernels), and a lot of its steps for modifying config
> files didn't seem to match the RH6 files. It also didn't seem
> to mention anything about automatic updating of nameservers.
>
> Are nameservers supposed to be automatically updated
> through DHCP, or do I need to know the nameservers in
> advance? If they're supposed to be configured automatically,
> what do I need to do to configure DHCP?
>
> Thanks,
> - Jon
------------------------------
From: Taso Hatzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Really slow FTP transfers
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 17:20:53 +1000
Just curious as to what transfer rates are people seeing on RH6 systems.
I got only 80kbps between two Linux systems on a ftp transfer of a 200MB
file.
I reckon that's a bit slow.
It's a 10Mbps ethernet, one system has an SMC card, the other
an Intel ether express.
TIA.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Subject: Re: Who has diald working really?
Date: 18 Aug 1999 21:25:40 GMT
On 18 Aug 1999 15:15:13 GMT, Mike Jagdis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Tough. Windows does not appear to be designed to behave
>reasonably when routing over demand dialled links.
True enough. However, since programs like Wingate and Sygate handle
this situation out of the box without requiring any changes in the
way Windoze handles name resolution, this implies there should be a way
to do it with diald if one can only conjure up the necessary mystical
incantations.
My own experiences with this indicate that if you have a network
of Linux machines, diald will probably work just great. However,
after uncounted hours of research and head-pounding I finally gave
up trying to get it to work on our Windoze network. It's a more
effective use of my time to just reboot the Wingate box when necessary,
at least until we get a full-time connection to the Net and no longer
have to worry about dialing issues.
--
Roger Blake
(remove second "g" from address for email)
------------------------------
From: David Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Why not C++
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 00:26:39 -0700
Johan Kullstam wrote:
>
> true enough. however, mis- or dangerous- usage should be slightly
> more awkward than safe usage. this is not so with C/C++.
I think you are still asking for the impossible.
> it often takes more work to look at return values, errno and catch
> exceptions than it does to simply ignore them.
It always takes more work to deal with something than to ignore it.
> in C the default
> handler is no handler at all.
I'm not sure I follow you, but I don't think this has anything to do
with the language. In C, there is no notion of a 'handler', is there?
> C++ helps somewhat but i still find it
> a royal pain in the ass to check and handle everything.
Yes, it is a royal pain in the ass to religiously check for everything
that might go wrong with everything that you do. _In_any_language_
It seems to be reality that you are upset with, not any particular
language. :)
> i seem
> especially prone to extra calls to dtors for my classes. many people
> (myself included) assume they have disk space and do not always check
> fwrite or putc.
These things can all easily be solved if they bother you. If you don't
like fwrite or putc, don't use them. Make your own functions that always
check these things and call them. But you'll find that it's hard to make
them, because what you do in case of the errors varies with how you are
using the functions. You really do have to do one of two things:
1) Ignore the error cases and hope for the best, or
2) Consider every possible error case at every step and code the right
behavior.
Now, you can do either in C or C++. What is the third option?
DS
------------------------------
From: "Alan M. Shih" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.questions,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: [Q]: Modem acts up
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 14:36:06 -0500
I have a PC running Redhat Linux 5.1, using a Motorola Modemsurf 56K
external modem. It was working well until one day it dialed up, seemed to
be connected, and then after 5-10 seconds, it disconnected. The script
automatically redial, but it just kept on and off ....
I bought another 56K external modem (Modem Blaster) and it did the same
thing. I then upgrade the PC to Redhat Linux 6.0, did not help. I even
moved the whole thing to another Dell PII-233, and still the same. These 2
modems work fine under Win98 and WinNT off the same network I have at home.
I am running out of ideas, please help.
Alan
------------------------------
From: Sujatha Natraj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: route problem: Can't add gateway address
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 17:05:27 +0800
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 22:49:20 GMT
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.networking, comp.os.linux.misc,
> comp.os.linux.setup
> Subject: Re: route problem: Can't add gateway address
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Youjip Won <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dear Linux guru,
> > I am fan of linux, but never ever able to get the network setup in
> > one shot. This time was not an exception. After several trials and
> > errors, I am finally writing this message in a hope that I could get
> > some help.
> >
> > To make long story short, I cannot add gateway to routing table.
> >
> > Here's what had happened. I can ifconfig and route add 'lo' and
> 'etho'.
> > When I do "route add default gw 166.104.88.1", it does not complain.
well, with a loopback or with a single interface, you really don't need a
default gw. But, if you need to fire up ppp, then do this:
pppd -d -detach /dev/modem 56400 &
ifconfig -a
(look for the dynamic ip allocated - call it a.b.c.d)
route add default gw a.b.c.d
this should work if you are trying to dial in to your, say ISP, and are
allocated a dynamic ip.
Yeah, the crudest way of doing things and not at all very pretty; but how
much more can a newbie help, afterall? ;)
One newbie to another,
-- nd.
******************************************************************************
Sujatha Natraj (year3/sem5)
SMTP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PSTN 256 8660 (residence)
HTTP http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~sujathan
Definition of the day:-
DESTINY : A tyrant's authority for crime and a fool's excuse for failure
******************************************************************************
------------------------------
From: "Patrick M�ller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: problem with ndc
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 23:58:58 +0200
Hi
I have a problem with my ndc! It gives the following output to the logfile
every hour or so:
Aug 18 22:50:35 pingu named[9643]: Cleaned cache of 0 RRs
Aug 18 22:50:35 pingu named[9643]: USAGE 935009435 934991435 CPU=0.18u/0.14s
CHILDCPU=0u/0s
Aug 18 22:50:35 pingu named[9643]: NSTATS 935009435 934991435 A=25 SOA=215
PTR=831 MX=2 ANY=2
Aug 18 22:50:35 pingu named[9643]: XSTATS 935009435 934991435 RR=51 RNXD=13
RFwdR=31 RDupR=0 RFail=0 RFErr=0 RErr=0 RAXFR=0 RLame=0 ROpts=0 SSysQ=17
SAns=992 SFwdQ=23 SDupQ=7 SErr=0 RQ=1075 RIQ=0 RFwdQ=0 RDupQ=0 RTCP=60
SFwdR=31 SFail=0 SFErr=0 SNaAns=143 SNXD=814
whats the problem?
Thanks for your help
Please mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (GCP)
Subject: Re: wysiwyg HTML editor for Linux
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 09:20:46 GMT
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:46:30 -0000, "Saevar Gardarsson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there any GOOD wysiwyg HTML editor for Linux (Gnome)??
>
Err...Netscape Composer ?
Oh, you need a GOOD one :)
--
GCP
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
