Linux-Networking Digest #312, Volume #12         Sat, 21 Aug 99 08:13:30 EDT

Contents:
  Re: $15 card or $98 card? ("withheld")
  Re: 3com ISA cards and linux
  Cable modem not working ("Roland M. Guyt")
  Re: Who has diald working really? (Frank Hahn)
  Re: Squid & undesired dial-ups (Frank Hahn)
  Re: Linux Friendly UK ISP's? (David Crooke)
  ftp : attempt to access beyond end of device (ingo korndoerfer)
  Re: Telnet problems ("Marshall")
  PAP authentication error ("Greg W. Moore")
  Re: Can Linux "see" Win95 drive/folders? How? (sensei)
  Is this possible? ("tick")
  Linux box as PPP Gateway??!! (root)
  Help with Rebooting (Mandeep)
  Re: all networking stops working for no reason (Geoff Short)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "withheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: $15 card or $98 card?
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 10:19:52 +0100

buy the $15 card and try it, if it works fine the n keep it.
if not return it and get a credit against the $98 card.
Lindoze 2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> yes folks, I just went and got a $35USD tulip card by bay networks
> called net gear 310. I've had some no name and a d-link 530tx. the no
> name brand never worked and I could not get support for them. the d-link
> card worked fine, but was not detected during setup. the tulip card was
> detected at setup and is the first time I've ever installed linux over a
> network! I have an ftp server with RedHat, SuSE, and Slackware linux on
> it.
> I could install the SuSE over ftp, but I could not get the Redhat to
> install over ftp.
> has anyone ever got to setup redhat over ftp? I'm running windoze on my
> other computers with no nfs. just ftp.
> also, what other cards can be detected automatically at mindlessly
> setup? ok experts, tell me about your mighty struggles! (get your fist
> out of your nose!)
>
>
>
>
> --
> Thank you for your valuable input. Your useful answers will benifit
> other users as well.
> You are Linux!
>
>
>
> ########################################################
> ##                                                    ##
> ## My Experiment                                      ##
> ## http://www.FusionPlant.com                         ##
> ##                                                    ##
> ########################################################



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Crossposted-To: 
at.linux,aus.computers.linux,be.comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: 3com ISA cards and linux
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 02:26:09 -0700

On Sat, 21 Aug 1999 02:19:56 +0200, Kalkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I have been seriously thinking to use Linux and stop using Windows 98. I am
>fascinated by Linux's stability and security.
>
>Therefore, I have seriously planing to install Linux and USE IT.
>
>However, it seems that it is not possible for me to use Linux, since I use
>cable modem with a 3com ISA card. More precisely, I use 3com EtherLink III
>ISA (3C509/3C509b) network interface card, and there are no drivers which

        ???? the 3c509.o module should work just fine, even 
        autodetects resources...

>will support my card in Linux.



-- 

It helps the car, in terms of end user complexity and engineering,         
that a car is not expected to suddenly become wood chipper at some    |||
arbitrary point as it's rolling down the road.                       / | \
                                                                       
                        Seeking sane PPP Docs? Try http://penguin.lvcm.com

------------------------------

From: "Roland M. Guyt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Cable modem not working
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 10:55:01 +0200

My cablemodem is working perfectly with Windows 98.
Now I installed Slack 4.0 with DHCPCD.
DHCPCD get the dhcp packet for me and configures Linux correctly.
However, it's not working. Ping fails on all IPs.

What am I missing here?

Thanks,

Roland



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Hahn)
Subject: Re: Who has diald working really?
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 10:04:11 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Wed, 18 Aug 1999 17:48:02 -0500, Robert C. Paulsen, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[Snipped]

>I have successfully "beaten" Windows into submission without running DNS.
>My filter rules are included below. I think all the things changed from
>the original are marked with my initials (RCP).
>
>The diald filter rules are enough to keep Win95/98 in check but I still
>have a problem with a WIn2000 beta. I had to include a few ipchains rules
>to fix that (the fix is overkill since the Win2000 system is effectively
>cut off from the internet). The ipchain rules are also included below.
>
[Snipped]

Other things to do:

1.  Disable all networking protocols on the MS Windows side except
for TCP/IP.

2.  Create a hosts file on the MS Windows side.  Put this file in
the c:\windows directory.  Make it the same as the one on the
Linux side.  Make sure this file has the IP address, fully
qualified machine names, and machine names of all machines on
your network.

For example:

XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX  machinename.domain.com  machinename
etc.


3.  Make sure the hosts file on the Linux side is also set
up properly.

4.  Make sure no demons on the Linux side are causing problems,
for example, sendmail checking for mail every 10 minutes or
so.

5.  Make sure other programs, for example, netscape, are not
checking your pop account for email at predefined intervals.

Currently, I have a three machine network at home.  I have a 486
running Linux, a MS Windows 95 machine, and a Sun Sparc running
Solaris.  I have not modified the rules supplied with diald.

I am using diald 0.16.5.

Best of luck.

-- 
Frank Hahn

To be sure of hitting the target, shoot first and, whatever you hit,
call it the target.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Hahn)
Subject: Re: Squid & undesired dial-ups
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 10:04:07 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Wed, 18 Aug 1999 12:26:31 +0200, Joseph Tweed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I think I posted something to this effect before, but as I still don't
>know the answer, I'm trying again.
>I'm running suse linux 6.0 + squid 2.2 on one machine, win98 + netscape
>on another. My linux machine is configured for automatic dial-up.
>Sometimes, I would surf to certain sites. After exiting netscape, the
>linux machine would dial up for no good reason, accessing the site I had
>visited earlier. This happens even after I reboot or turn off the win98
>machine, so it has nothing to do with windows wanting to dial up ever so
>often.
>My explanation is that scripts are being cached by squid, and that these
>scripts are being allowed to run.
>Does anyone know about this problem, and what to do about it?
>
If I had to guess, it is probably Windows 98 doing a DNS lookup.

If you think it is Linux, see if there are any programs running
that might cause this.  I don't know that much about squid, but
I thought it only cached pages to your local hard drive.

Try the tcpdump program and see if you can find out what is causing
your link to come up.

If you are using the demand dial function in pppd, I don't know
if you have much choice in controlling it.  If you are using
diald, then you can mess around with the different rules on what
will and will not bring up your link.

-- 
Frank Hahn

Shaw's Principle:
        Build a system that even a fool can use, and only a fool will
want to use it.

------------------------------

From: David Crooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux Friendly UK ISP's?
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 09:28:41 GMT

Speedy Fast wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 23:08:42 +0100, "Andrew Taylor"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm currently using a standard demon dial up account, for �11.75 I get
> >unlimited dial up access, 20MB webspace, a subdomain name, fixed IP address
> >and SMTP delivery? Are they're any other ISP's which also provide these
> >facilites and are easy to get going under linux?

I have my parents (SuSe 5.3) on free-online.co.uk, which is OK, but
AFAIK delivery by SMTP is a rare luxury that you only get with
techno-savvy ISP's like Demon. Free-Online's server claims to be ETRN
compliant but I never got it to work that way. I have set up for them
mail recovery using fetchmail, and demand dialling using diald, with a
cron job to fire off a mail collect in the wee hours every morning.
There is a "domain" name for mail receipt and web pages (their hosting)
only.

If you want the good service, IMHO demon is worth the 12 quid, but all
my aged ones wanted was email and a bit fo surfing.

> 
> Any dial up should be easy to setup under Linux.  Try Red Hat 6.x.
> It's pretty straightforward.
> 
> FWIW you really should get cable, ADSL or wireless.

None of these exist in the UK, in the form the poster refers to. He's in
the 51st state (Canada) which has US technology and even US phone
numbers. ;-) Phone technology over here is pretty primitive - in the
USA/Canada, a modem typically only connects at 28.8K or 33.6K beacuse
the phone lines are so rough. I bet his mobile phone sucks as much as
the AT&T one I've got to put up with. Come back Cellnet, all is
forgiven! I want my, I want my, I want my GSM....

But I digress.

I think a couple of the UK cable companies are looking into doing cable
"modems" - this is what he meant  by "cable", and is basically an
ethernet-speed (very fast) 24hr connection carried down the same
circuits as Cable TV. This necessitates being in a big city. Cable TV
technology in the UK is a bit different (mostly fibre optic, here it's
mostly coax) so this may delay availability of suitable endpoint
equipment. I have a cable modem for which I pay the equivalent of 35
quid a month and it's pretty good value.

What most UK cable companies offer is a cheap deal on a second line on
their phone service, and ISP connections on cable numbers which dodge
(some of) the call fees. So it's still a 56K dialup.

ADSL is a variant of DSL, which runs on a HF carrier down the normal BT
copper phone line. I know BT were testing this in some wee village in
Yorkshire, but don't hold your breath. They were still trying to punt
ISDN for home use last time I heard.

The "wireless" here is some wierd stunt where you use a normal modem for
uplink, and use a microwave relay dish to receive a high speed downlink
stream. Haven't heard of anyone doing it in the UK.

-- 
David Crooke, Austin TX, USA. +1 (512) 656 6102
"Open source software - with no walls and fences, who needs Windows
and Gates?"

------------------------------

From: ingo korndoerfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ftp : attempt to access beyond end of device
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 22:44:11 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

i have just installed mandrake 6.0, dialed into our
campus modempool. connected to one of our machines
and now i am trying to upload (ftp) a major binary file.

my local ftp daemon (at home) is not up, 
networking is 'no' (i think).
i turned 'hash' on, filetype is 'image'. 
some 80 marks zip by, and then that's 
it. after 5 minutes still nothing moves and the filesize 
on the other end is '0'.

dmesg shows :

attempt to access beyond end of device
03:06: rw=0, want=1735287149, limit=1159168 

i have to Ctrl-C out of this and the
kill -9 the ftp job.

what have i screwed up ?

1000 thanks for any tips.

                            ingo

------------------------------

From: "Marshall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Telnet problems
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 02:28:40 -0400

Could it be a "port" issue ?. That is: find out if you have a block on that
port.


Yury Donskoy wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi there,
>
>I'm having a weird problem with telnet which appears to have recently
>started, I believe after I went from RH 5.2 to Mandrake 6.0.  The
>problem is this: telneting from a Win'98 box to my Linux server displays
>the 'issue.net' file, and then dies.  I don't even get a 'Login:'
>prompt.  But, if I telnet from the Linux box to itself using the box's
>own IP address, everything works correctly.  Now, this network of mine,
>everything else works.  Samba, FTP, etc.  It all works, except for
>telnet.  Does anyone have any suggestionss?  hosts.allow is set
>correctly, and so is hosts.
>
>Thanks.
>Yury.
>



------------------------------

Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 00:24:07 -0700
From: "Greg W. Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PAP authentication error

Hi, 
I'm a bit of a newbie when it comes to Linux (red hat 6) and I'm having
problems when it comes to connecting to my isp (best.com) via ISDN with
an external 3Com impactIQ on com1 I keep getting: "pppd[2212]: PAP
authentication failed"

I wonder if any one can point me in the right direction. I've read web
pages, howto documents and other docs until the words blur together. I
kinda feel so close but yet so far from successfully connecting. I've
tried kppp and don't have any better success.

one other question, get this message below.... and can't figure out
where it comes from:
Aug 18 17:52:11 gregm modprobe: can't locate module char-major-45
Aug 18 17:52:42 gregm last message repeated 82 times

below is all sort of stuff relating to ppp conection

thanks in advance,
Greg.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Distribution:                  Red Hat Linux
Operating System:              Linux
Distribution Version:          Red Hat Linux release 6.0 (Hedwig)

Operating System Version:      #3 Sun Aug 15 20:43:11 EDT 1999
Operating System Release:      2.2.5-15
Processor Type:                i586
Host Name:                     gregm
ppp 2.3.7

============================
from /var/log/messages

Aug 18 17:51:11 gregm chat[2216]: ATD16509640240^M^M
Aug 18 17:51:11 gregm chat[2216]: CONNECT
Aug 18 17:51:11 gregm chat[2216]:  -- got it 
Aug 18 17:51:11 gregm chat[2216]: send (^M)
Aug 18 17:51:11 gregm chat[2216]: expect (ogin:)
Aug 18 17:51:11 gregm chat[2216]:  115200^M
Aug 18 17:51:12 gregm chat[2216]: Welcome to BEST Internet
Communications.^M
Aug 18 17:51:12 gregm chat[2216]: Mountain View, Server 7 - Port 42^M
Aug 18 17:51:12 gregm chat[2216]: ^M
Aug 18 17:51:12 gregm chat[2216]: ^M
Aug 18 17:51:12 gregm chat[2216]: Enter hostname (e.g. shell3.ba) with
no password, or your SLIP/PPP login:
Aug 18 17:51:12 gregm chat[2216]:  -- got it 
Aug 18 17:51:12 gregm chat[2216]: send (gregm^M)
Aug 18 17:51:12 gregm chat[2216]: expect (assword:)
Aug 18 17:51:12 gregm chat[2216]:  ^M
Aug 18 17:51:12 gregm chat[2216]: Enter hostname (e.g. shell3.ba) with
no password, or your SLIP/PPP login: gregm^M
Aug 18 17:51:12 gregm chat[2216]: 
Aug 18 17:51:12 gregm chat[2216]: Password:
Aug 18 17:51:12 gregm chat[2216]:  -- got it 
Aug 18 17:51:12 gregm chat[2216]: send (XXXXXXXX^M)
Aug 18 17:51:12 gregm pppd[2212]: Serial connection established.
Aug 18 17:51:12 gregm pppd[2212]: Using interface ppp0
Aug 18 17:51:12 gregm pppd[2212]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
Aug 18 17:51:17 gregm pppd[2212]: Remote message: Invalid username or
password
Aug 18 17:51:17 gregm pppd[2212]: PAP authentication failed
Aug 18 17:52:10 gregm pppd[2212]: Terminating on signal 2.
Aug 18 17:52:10 gregm pppd[2212]: Connection terminated.
Aug 18 17:52:10 gregm pppd[2212]: Connect time 1.0 minutes.
Aug 18 17:52:10 gregm pppd[2212]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Aug 18 17:52:10 gregm pppd[2212]: Exit.

===============================
ppp-on
#!/bin/sh
#
TELEPHONE=16509640240   # The telephone number for the connection
ACCOUNT=gregm           # The account name for logon (as in 'George Burns')
PASSWORD=XXXXXXXXX      # The password for this account (and 'Gracie Allen')
LOCAL_IP=0.0.0.0        # Local IP address if known. Dynamic = 0.0.0.0
REMOTE_IP=0.0.0.0       # Remote IP address if desired. Normally 0.0.0.0
NETMASK=255.255.255.0   # The proper netmask if needed
export TELEPHONE ACCOUNT PASSWORD
DIALER_SCRIPT=/etc/ppp/ppp-on-dialer
#
exec /usr/sbin/pppd debug lock modem crtscts /dev/ttyS0 115200 \
        asyncmap 20A0000 escape FF kdebug 0 $LOCAL_IP:$REMOTE_IP \
        papcrypt noipdefault defaultroute connect $DIALER_SCRIPT


===============================
pap-secrets

# Secrets for authentication using PAP
# client        server  secret                  IP addresses
gregm   ppp0    XXXXXXX


===============================
ppp-on-dialer

#!/bin/sh
#
# This is part 2 of the ppp-on script. It will perform the connection
# protocol for the desired connection.
#
exec chat -v                                            \
        TIMEOUT         3                               \
        ABORT           '\nBUSY\r'                      \
        ABORT           '\nNO ANSWER\r'                 \
        ABORT           '\nRINGING\r\n\r\nRINGING\r'    \
        ''              \rAT                            \
        'OK-+++\c-OK'   ATH0                            \
        TIMEOUT         30                              \
        OK              ATD$TELEPHONE                   \
        CONNECT         ''                              \
        ogin:--ogin:    $ACCOUNT                        \
        assword:        $PASSWORD

------------------------------

From: sensei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can Linux "see" Win95 drive/folders? How?
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 03:56:43 -0700

Thank you....

Your blood is worth bottling!

I have been mucking around with samba for weeks now,
and it never occured to me that I should do as you
suggested.

Simple suggestion, and it worked


again, thanks!!!

Luke


* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!


------------------------------

From: "tick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Is this possible?
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 01:30:17 -0700

I've got dsl and one ip address with mydomain.com registered to it.  Would
it be possible to register a my2nddomain.com with the same ip address but
then redirect it to an internal web server.



------------------------------

From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Linux box as PPP Gateway??!!
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 07:04:42 -0400

My two PC have the same RH6.0 with kernel 2.2.5, I recompiled the kernel
for enable some necessary options of masquerading and forwarding.

Two PC refer as A and B. Now A dial up to my ISP without any problems.
And the communication between A & B are also good, such as: ftp, telnet.
But when I try to setup machine A as gateway so that B can also use
Internet while I dial up from A, I failed.

IP of A is 192.168.0.1, B is 192.168.0.2. In B, the config file include:

" route add -default gw 192.168.0.1 metric 1"

In A, I include:

"ipchains -P forward DENY
  ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -s 192.168.0.0/24 -d 0.0.0.0/0"

I use the same way under Kernel 2.2.1, and it worked! But now it doesn't
work under RH 6.0?

I feel so bad, almost back to NT. :--)

I may forget some points? Anybody could help me out??!!

Thanks!!!!!!! PLease also email me!

Jack




------------------------------

Subject: Help with Rebooting
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mandeep)
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 02:20:26 GMT

About every 20 days our Linux system starts to act funny.  Once several users 
are using our system at the same time, outside web pages cannot be accessed.  
We get the error "Connot Establish Network Host...Connection Aborted" when 
someone tries to access an outside web page.  In order to resolve this, we 
have to reboot our system.  Does anybody know why this is happening and how to 
stop this from happening?  Please e-mail me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geoff Short)
Subject: Re: all networking stops working for no reason
Date: 21 Aug 1999 11:29:02 GMT

<Stuff about RH6 not working snipped>

Nobody has mentioned which kernel version they are running -- you should
try the newest release and see if the drivers have been updated.  

Guy Premont ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: 
: One thing that I find disturbing is the output from the "free" command:
:              total       used       free     shared    buffers    cached
: Mem:        128092     124504       3588      19780      18696    93412
: -/+ buffers/cache:      12396     115696
: Swap:       136512          0     136512
: 
: With 128Mb RAM and nothing running but the login screen, I think that
: less than 4 MB free memory is not enough. It look like it doesn't free
: everything.

Your machine has 115696k free, that should be enough for anyone :)  The
rest is being used to buffer input/output and as a disk cache, as shown
on the Mem: line.  This memory can all be used for user programs if needed,
but if not then it gets put to good use as cache.

        Geoff
-- 
============================================================================
Ever sit and watch ants? They're always busy with                Geoff Short
something, never stop for a moment.  I just          [EMAIL PROTECTED]
can't identify with that kind of work ethic. http://kipper.york.ac.uk/~geoff

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to