Linux-Networking Digest #376, Volume #12 Thu, 26 Aug 99 20:14:10 EDT
Contents:
Remote X windows Problem (default)
Shutting off unneeded services (Vlar Schreidlocke)
Re: How to get on the WWW (Tom Eastep)
Re: Dial-in to NT RAS Server? ("Sagolsem C")
[Q] Setting my machine's hostname (Jake Colman)
Re: Specifying proxy server for netscape (Tom Eastep)
Re: How to get on the WWW ("Kelvin R. Dam")
Re: Win98 -> Red Hat problem ("David Guerizec")
Re: Can an ISP detect masquerading? (Jerry Gardner)
SIOCGIFCONF & IFF_LOOPBACK flag; netkit-routed-0.10 (Mark Johnson)
Why, Why Why (Alvaro Garriga)
Re: [Q] Setting my machine's hostname (Jake Colman)
Problems with SMC EtherPower II (Richard van der Hoff)
Re: [Q] Setting my machine's hostname (Bernd Eckenfels)
Re: Routing / Gateways (Christopher Allen)
Re: Win98 newsreader through IP MASQ ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: ip routing problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Why, Why Why (Mark Johnson)
Re: Problems with networking and modules (Mark Johnson)
ppp problems ("Dominic Tynes")
NFSD Won't Start (Dwight Rudolph Jr)
wu_ftp problem
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: default <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Remote X windows Problem
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 16:40:19 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Running Redhat 6 2.2.5-15 .
I get the initial UDP 177 greeter (GNOME), but seems to die after that.
(same subnet.)
What do I need to do to make this work?
I'm using Exceed Humingbird...works fine for the Sun boxes. (doh)
Thanks in advance.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vlar Schreidlocke)
Subject: Shutting off unneeded services
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 20:27:00 GMT
What's the easiest way to shut of unneeded online services (web
server, ftp server, etc.) in Red Hat 6.0? I'm going to be connecting
my network to a cablemodem and I don't want the isp scanning me for
these servers and shutting me down.
------------------------------
From: Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to get on the WWW
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 19:37:41 +0000
Guy Forssman wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have Linux 6 and I know the modem works because it trys to connect to
> Worldonline.be
> But it get disconnected all the time. Worldonline says they use Chap instead
> of PAP.
> How do i tell netcfg that and what is CHAP
> And for instance where do i put the primary dns 212.233.1.34
> and the secondary one dns 212.233.2.34.
>
> Thanks a lot in advance GuyF
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I suggest that you read the PPP-HOWTO -- your questions are answered
there in detail.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep | Opinions expressed here
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | are my own and not
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | those of my employer
Shoreline, Washington USA |
------------------------------
From: "Sagolsem C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Dial-in to NT RAS Server?
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 18:23:59 -0400
Dont know what QVT Terminal Emulation program does. Posibilites are that ur
NT box runs a telnet server and people connect to it using just terminal
emulation and no PPP or SLIP. In that case use minicom ( in linux) but u
wont be able to access ur excahnge mails. If ur NT RAS accepts ppp, In that
case connect to NT RAS from ur linux box using ppp. Find out ur RAS accepts
pap or chap for authentication. Then read the ppp-howto. If it is ppp then u
can acces ur exchange mails from linux.
Sagolsem.
Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm an Unix System Admin with a problem. In order to dial in to the Unix
> servers at work from home, I have to dial-in to an NT RAS Server.
Everyone at
> work does this quite easily using Windoze with the QVT Terminal Emulation
> program. I'm really at a loss about how to do this via my Linux box at
home.
> Does anyone have experience with this/know how to do it? Also, I'd like
to
> access my work email from home also, but its on a Win NT server on M$
Exchange.
> I *heard* that Exchange can function as an IMAP Server, so an IMAP email
> client on Linux could get it (like Netscape). Is this true? Thanks ahead
of
> time.
>
> I *prefer* a reply via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Ryan "A"
------------------------------
Subject: [Q] Setting my machine's hostname
From: Jake Colman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 26 Aug 1999 15:36:06 -0400
How should my machine's hostname be set? Is it supposed to be the FQDN or
just the base part? In other words "jake.home.com" or "jake"? I've tried it
both ways and either way seems to work but, in all cases, 'hostname -f' fails
with a lookup error.
I am not running DNS or NIS.
Thanx!
--
Jake Colman
Principia Partners LLC Phone: (201) 946-0300
Harborside Financial Center Fax: (201) 946-0320
902 Plaza II Beeper: (800) 505-2795
Jersey City, NJ 07311 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.ppllc.com
------------------------------
From: Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Specifying proxy server for netscape
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 19:31:23 +0000
Suresh Muthuswami wrote:
>
> In the windows version of Netscape, there's a way of specifying proxy
> servers. However, in the Linux version (Netscape Communicator 4.61 --
> came with Linux mandrake), this is absent.
Look again - Edit->Preferences->Advanced->Proxies
I'm writing this using Communicator 4.61 configured with a proxy.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep | Opinions expressed here
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | are my own and not
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | those of my employer
Shoreline, Washington USA |
------------------------------
From: "Kelvin R. Dam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to get on the WWW
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 22:32:15 +0200
If you start your X server, it's pretty easy to configure a dial-up
connection there.
(system - netconfig)
Kelvin Dam
------------------------------
From: "David Guerizec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Win98 -> Red Hat problem
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 22:16:02 +0200
Hi,
===== Original Message =====
From: GreGo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.networking
Sent: Friday, August 27, 1999 4:41 AM
Subject: Win98 -> Red Hat problem
> I can't login from Win98 to Linux by telnet. Ftp doesn't work too. When
> I trie to login telnet says "conected" but didn't shows welcome screen.
> Thanks
> Grego
>
well, in fact I don't know the answer to your question, but I know it works.
unfortunatly, I made it work a few weeks ago, but I changed many thing in my
config, and now it won't anymore...
I have now a very similar problem as yours.
my config:
Linux Red-Hat 6.0 with two NICs (eth0->internet and eth1->local network)
IPMasq config
when I try to reach my linux box from inside (local nw) or outside
(internet) thru http, it works well
but if I try to telnet or ftp or rlogin it from anywhere (even from my linux
box) it connects and tell me that service isn't available (ftp error 421) or
connection reset by peer...
but I know that ftp or telnet is running cause it is effectively connected
during a few seconds:
(for ftp)
# fuser -a -v -n tcp 21
USER PID ACCESS COMMAND
23/tcp root 425 f.... inetd
root 1982 f.... tcpd
so, what's happening ?
Thanx for your help
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jerry Gardner)
Subject: Re: Can an ISP detect masquerading?
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 23:25:40 GMT
On Wed, 25 Aug 1999 23:31:29 GMT, Tom Verbeure wrote:
>
>Hello All,
>
>a tech-guy of my ISP claims that they are able to detect a host running
>Linux IP masquerading (and, of course, that it is forbidden by their
>policy to use this.) Is this true? Are there network expert here who can
>comment on this?
Tom,
An ISP can detect a host running masquerading by looking at port
number usage. Masquerading typically remaps port numbers to the 6xxxx
range.
This is the only way they can detect masquerading, and this is not a
sure-fire indication of someone using masquerading. I doubt if it
would stand up legally if they tried to cut you off.
--
Jerry Gardner | "Bill Clinton has all the steely resolve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | of a kamakaze pilot on his 37th mission."
------------------------------
From: Mark Johnson <markj*no*spam*@gilanet.com>
Crossposted-To: linux.sources.kernel,linux.redhat.misc,comp.os.linux.admin
Subject: SIOCGIFCONF & IFF_LOOPBACK flag; netkit-routed-0.10
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 17:05:37 -0600
Reply-To: markj*no*spam*@gilanet.com
I upgraded my RH5.1 system the hard way. Afterward, I found that routed
writes an error message to my logfile every minute or so:
Aug 26: 16:29:26 mybox routed[370]: packet from unknown router,
127.0.0.1
>From the manpage for routed, I see that the loopback interface should be
ignored by routed. So, I look at the source code in
/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/netkit-routed-0.10/routed.
1. I find where the error message prints in the file input.c.
It appears that what happens is this: input.c gets some input/packet
with the RIPCMD_RESPONSE flag set; it checks whether this is from a
router it should be handling, by looking it up; it doesn't find
127.0.0.1, so it sends an error via SYSLOG.
2. I figure that the kernel shouldn't be sending loopback stuff as input
to routed, so I look at startup.c and find:
void ifinit(void) loops through the interfaces (reading each struct
interface) and does stuff with them. Among other things, it checks to
see whether an interface is the loopback interface by comparing a flag
called IFF_LOOPBACKwith a struct interface member called int_flags.
3. I now hypothesize that, somehow, my lo/loopback interface is not
getting its IFF_LOOPBACK flag set by init scripts. How can I check this?
Does it have something to do with SIOCGIFCONF? Where can I get info
about this?
------------------------------
From: Alvaro Garriga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Why, Why Why
Date: 26 Aug 1999 13:46:41 PDT
I installed Red Hat 6.0 everything when through fine.
I setup samba got it working I rebooted the machine. Now I have bring my network
card up with ipconfig to be able to ping.
( ipconfig eth0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask 255.255.255.0 up ).
Where can I find this network configuration settings?
Thanks in Advance.
------------------------------
Subject: Re: [Q] Setting my machine's hostname
From: Jake Colman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 26 Aug 1999 19:42:22 -0400
>>>>> "BE" == Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BE> Jake Colman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> How should my machine's hostname be set? Is it supposed to be the
>> FQDN or just the base part? In other words "jake.home.com" or "jake"?
>> I've tried it both ways and either way seems to work but, in all
>> cases, 'hostname -f' fails with a lookup error.
BE> It doesnt realy matter... both works sometimes and sometimes not ...
So it's expected that 'hostname -f' should fail?!
--
Jake Colman
Principia Partners LLC Phone: (201) 946-0300
Harborside Financial Center Fax: (201) 946-0320
902 Plaza II Beeper: (800) 505-2795
Jersey City, NJ 07311 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.ppllc.com
------------------------------
From: Richard van der Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problems with SMC EtherPower II
Date: 27 Aug 1999 00:05:45 +0100
I recently upgraded my kernel to 2.2.10 (from 2.0.36), and since doing
so, I have been unable to get my Etherpower II working. If anybody
has any suggestions where I go from here, I would be most grateful!
I'm using version 1.06 of the driver, and am trying to connect it to a
10baseT link; to this end I am using the options
debug=6 options=4 full_duplex=0
to the module.
The card appears to be correctly detected at startup:
$ dmesg
...
epic100.c:v1.06 2/10/98 Donald Becker http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/
epic100.html
eth0: SMSC EPIC/100 83c170 at 0xe800, IRQ 11, 00:e0:29:33:f3:b6.
eth0: EEPROM contents
e000 3329 b6f3 1b00 001d 1c08 10b8 a015 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
0010 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 4d53 3943 3334 4232
5854 2020 0000 0000 0200 0200 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
eth0: MII transceiver #3 control 3000 status 7809.
eth0: Autonegotiation advertising 01e1 link partner 0001.
eth0: Setting half-duplex based on MII xcvr 3 register read of 0001.
eth0: epic_open() ioaddr e800 IRQ 11 status 0512 half-duplex.
...
eth0: Media monitor tick, Tx status 00000000.
eth0: Other registers are IntMask 13bf IntStatus 248000 RxStatus ffff007f.
eth0: Media monitor tick, Tx status 00000000.
eth0: Other registers are IntMask 13bf IntStatus 248000 RxStatus ffff007f.
...
However I find that no packets are received transmitted without
error. The following error occurs on packet transmission:
eth0: Transmit error, Tx status 00007000.
epic-diag reports the following:
richards:epic# ./epic-diag -a
Found SMC83C170 EPIC/100 card #1 at 0xe800.
The EPIC/100 chip appears to be active, so some registers will not be read.
To see all register values use the '-f' flag.
EPIC chip registers at 0xe800
0x000: 00000008 00248040 000013bf 00000512 0000001d 00000060 00000000 00000000
0x020: 00000000 00000000 00000000 0000ffff 00000650 00000021 00000016 00003c60
0x040: 0000e000 00003329 0000b6f3 00001b00 0000ffff 0000ffff 0000ffff 0000ffff
0x060: 0000000c ******** ******** ******** 00003c79 00003000 ******** ********
0x080: ******** 00fff820 ******** ******** ******** ******** ******** ********
0x0A0: ******** ffff087f ******** ******** ffff0bff ******** ******** ********
0x0C0: ******** 00fffad0 ******** ******** ******** ******** ******** 00fff900
0x0E0: ******** ******** ******** ******** ******** ******** ******** ********
Interrupt sources are pending.
Tx chain done indication.
Rx status valid indication.
Transmitter: slot time 512 bits, half-duplex mode.
Last transmit FAILED!!, 16 collisions.
richards:epic# ./epic-diag -e
Found SMC83C170 EPIC/100 card #1 at 0xe800.
EEPROM contents:
e000 3329 b6f3 1b00 001d 1c08 10b8 a015
0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
0010 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
0000 0000 0000 0000 4d53 3943 3334 4232
5854 2020 0000 0000 0200 0200 0000 0000
0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
The word-wide EEPROM checksum is 0x2a8e.
Parsing the EEPROM of a EPIC/100:
Station Address 00:E0:29:33:F3:B6.
Board name 'SMC9432BTX ', revision 182.
Calculated checksum is 00.
richards:epic# ./epic-diag -m
Found SMC83C170 EPIC/100 card #1 at 0xe800.
MII PHY found at address 3.
MII PHY #3 transceiver registers:
1000 782d 0181 4401 01e1 0021 0000 ffff
ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
0040 0018 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
ffff ffff ffff 003e ffff 0040 0000 1dc4.
MII PHY #3 transceiver registers:
1000 782d 0181 4401 01e1 0021 0000 ffff
ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
0040 0018 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
ffff ffff ffff 003e ffff 0040 0000 1dc4.
Basic mode control register 0x1000: Auto-negotiation enabled.
Basic mode status register 0x782d ... 782d.
Link status: established.
Capable of 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx 10baseT-FD 10baseT.
Able to perform Auto-negotiation, negotiation complete.
Vendor ID is 00:60:51:--:--:--, model 0 rev. 1.
Vendor/Part: Quality Semiconductor (unknown type).
I'm advertising 01e1: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx 10baseT-FD 10baseT
Advertising no additional info pages.
IEEE 802.3 CSMA/CD protocol.
Link partner capability is 0021: 10baseT.
Negotiation did not complete.
I've tried installing the driver both as a module and built in to the
kernel, but the effect seems much ther same.
--
Richard van der Hoff | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jesus College, Cambridge, England | http://www.jesus.cam.ac.uk/~rav21
=======================================================================
------------------------------
From: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Q] Setting my machine's hostname
Date: 26 Aug 1999 23:07:17 GMT
Jake Colman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How should my machine's hostname be set? Is it supposed to be the FQDN or
> just the base part? In other words "jake.home.com" or "jake"? I've tried it
> both ways and either way seems to work but, in all cases, 'hostname -f' fails
> with a lookup error.
It doesnt realy matter... both works sometimes and sometimes not ...
------------------------------
From: Christopher Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Routing / Gateways
Date: 26 Aug 1999 21:52:40 GMT
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake:
> problem. Wehn I �tracert� an access to the internet on the Win-Box, it
> doesn�t even access the linux-server....
Are your win machines actually pointing to your linux as their gateway?
-out
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Win98 newsreader through IP MASQ
Date: 26 Aug 1999 17:48:12 +0800
If the Linux Box masquerade TCP connections from internet net to the
internet, Agent 1.5 for Windows, which talks NNTP protocol should be
fine. Just set the news server points to the news server of your ISP,
and everything should be ok.
Vlar Schreidlocke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have several Win98 machines connected to a Linux box running RH 6.0
> with IP Masquerade. I have http and ftp working, but I can't seem to
> figure out how to get Agent 1.5 (Win98 newsreader) to connect and get
> newsgroups through the Linux box. I have read the ip-masq-HOWTO-1.77
> several times with no results on this particular problem. What am I
> missing? Can anyone help?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ip routing problem
Date: 26 Aug 1999 17:45:14 +0800
Do we also need ipchains to add some forward line for forwarding packets
between both networks?
Rutger Moody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do i do to connect two small networks with a linux ip router ?
> My router is a linux box with 2 ethernet interfaces both with a different
> network address. I thought the only thing i had to do was:
> - "route add -net ..." for both interfaces on the router.
> - configure the router as the default gateway on the other hosts
> But this doesn't work.
> Do i need some other software like gated or routed ?
> I can ping both networks from the router itself and i can also ping both
> interfaces on the router from any other host. But i can not ping from a host
> on net1 to a host on net 2 if not one of the hosts is the router.
> Am i missing something simple ??
> Please help
> Thanks
------------------------------
From: Mark Johnson <markj*no*spam*@gilanet.com>
Subject: Re: Why, Why Why
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 16:24:48 -0600
Reply-To: markj*no*spam*@gilanet.com
Alvaro Garriga wrote:
> I installed Red Hat 6.0 everything when through fine.
> I setup samba got it working I rebooted the machine. Now I have bring my network
> card up with ipconfig to be able to ping.
> ( ipconfig eth0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask 255.255.255.0 up ).
> Where can I find this network configuration settings?
Look at these scripts:
/etc/rc.d/init.d/network (examine the lines following "for $i in interfaces; do")
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup
------------------------------
From: Mark Johnson <markj*no*spam*@gilanet.com>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: Problems with networking and modules
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 16:18:43 -0600
Reply-To: markj*no*spam*@gilanet.com
RHX (where X<=6.0) comes with an old tulip.c than doesn't work well with
the Netgear cards. Eg, the tulip.c with RH6.0 is dated 5/23/98. I use one
dated 2/99 and everything works fine. Go get you a newer one at:
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/tulip.html
You'll need to compile it and replace tulip.o with the newly compiled
module.
------------------------------
From: "Dominic Tynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ppp problems
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 17:01:01 -0500
I am unable to connect to a ppp dial-in server.
I am running RH 6.0 with an external 56K US Robotics modem. Dial-in works
under 98.
To get an idea of what was expected by the dial-in server, the first command
I ran was:
/usr/sbin/pppd /dev/ttyS0 57600 debug connect "/usr/sbin/chat -v '' AT OK
ATDT1234567 CONNECT '\d\c'"
This was in /var/log/ppp:
Aug 25 21:57:51 localhost pppd[690]: pppd 2.3.7 started by root, uid 0
Aug 25 21:57:52 localhost chat[691]: send (AT^M)
Aug 25 21:57:52 localhost chat[691]: expect (OK)
Aug 25 21:57:52 localhost chat[691]: AT^M^M
Aug 25 21:57:52 localhost chat[691]: OK
Aug 25 21:57:52 localhost chat[691]: -- got it
Aug 25 21:57:52 localhost chat[691]: send (ATDT1234567^M)
Aug 25 21:57:52 localhost chat[691]: expect (CONNECT)
Aug 25 21:57:52 localhost chat[691]: ^M
Aug 25 21:58:13 localhost chat[691]: ATDT1234567^M^M
Aug 25 21:58:13 localhost chat[691]: CONNECT
Aug 25 21:58:13 localhost chat[691]: -- got it
Aug 25 21:58:13 localhost chat[691]: send (\d)
Aug 25 21:58:14 localhost pppd[690]: Serial connection established.
Aug 25 21:58:14 localhost pppd[690]: Using interface ppp0
Aug 25 21:58:14 localhost pppd[690]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0xa54acd7d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1534>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth 0xc027 01 00 00 03 00 00 00 0e> <magic 0xc5fa16c4>
<accomp> < 11 04 05 fe> < 12 02> < 13 09 03 00 01 cb f2 08 01>]
Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 <auth 0xc027
01 00 00 03 00 00 00 0e> < 11 04 05 fe> < 12 02> < 13 09 03 00 01 cb f2 08
01>]
Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0xa54acd7d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mru 1534>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth 0xc027 01 00 00 02> <magic 0xc5fa16c4> <accomp>]
Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x2 <auth 0xc027
01 00 00 02>]
Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x3 <mru 1534>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth 0xc123 01 00 00 02> <magic 0xc5fa16c4> <accomp>]
Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x3 <auth 0xc123
01 00 00 02>]
Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x4 <mru 1534>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth chap MD5> <magic 0xc5fa16c4> <accomp>]
Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x4 <auth chap
MD5>]
Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x5 <mru 1534>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0xc5fa16c4> <accomp>]
Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x5 <auth pap>]
Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x6 <mru 1534>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth 0xc027 01 00 00 03 00 00 00 0e> <magic 0xc5fa16c4>
<accomp>]
Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x6 <auth 0xc027
01 00 00 03 00 00 00 0e>]
Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x7 <mru 1534>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth 0xc027 01 00 00 02> <magic 0xc5fa16c4> <accomp>]
Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x7 <auth 0xc027
01 00 00 02>]
Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x8 <mru 1534>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth 0xc027 01 00 00 02> <magic 0xc5fa16c4> <accomp>]
Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x8 <auth 0xc027
01 00 00 02>]
Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x9 <mru 1534>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth 0xc027 01 00 00 02> <magic 0xc5fa16c4> <accomp>]
Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x9 <auth 0xc027
01 00 00 02>]
Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xa <mru 1534>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth 0xc027 01 00 00 02> <magic 0xc5fa16c4> <accomp>]
Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0xa <auth 0xc027
01 00 00 02>]
Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xb <mru 1534>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth 0xc027 01 00 00 02> <magic 0xc5fa16c4> <accomp>]
Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0xb <auth 0xc027
01 00 00 02>]
Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP TermReq id=0x1 02]
Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP TermAck id=0x1]
Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: Modem hangup
Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: Connection terminated.
Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: Connect time 0.1 minutes.
Aug 25 21:58:17 localhost pppd[690]: Exit.
Based on that, I set up pap-secrets and chap-secrets as:
# Secrets for authentication using PAP
# client server secret IP addresses
fakeuser * fakepass *
and
# Secrets for authentication using CHAP
# client server secret IP addresses
fakeuser * fakepass *
respectively, then ran:
/usr/sbin/pppd /dev/ttyS0 57600 debug user fakeuser connect
"/usr/sbin/chat -v -t 20 '' ATDT1234567 CONNECT '' TIMEOUT 5 serid:--serid:
fakeuser assword? fakepass"
and got this in /var/log/ppp:
Aug 25 22:04:38 localhost pppd[770]: pppd 2.3.7 started by root, uid 0
Aug 25 22:04:39 localhost chat[771]: send (ATDT1234567^M)
Aug 25 22:04:39 localhost chat[771]: expect (CONNECT)
Aug 25 22:04:58 localhost chat[771]: ATDT1234567^M^M
Aug 25 22:04:58 localhost chat[771]: CONNECT
Aug 25 22:04:58 localhost chat[771]: -- got it
Aug 25 22:04:58 localhost chat[771]: send (^M)
Aug 25 22:04:58 localhost chat[771]: timeout set to 5 seconds
Aug 25 22:04:58 localhost chat[771]: expect (serid:)
Aug 25 22:04:58 localhost chat[771]: 14400/ARQ/V34/LAPM/V42BIS^M
Aug 25 22:05:03 localhost chat[771]: alarm
Aug 25 22:05:03 localhost chat[771]: send (^M)
Aug 25 22:05:03 localhost chat[771]: expect (serid:)
Aug 25 22:05:03 localhost chat[771]: @ Userid:
Aug 25 22:05:03 localhost chat[771]: -- got it
Aug 25 22:05:03 localhost chat[771]: send (fakeuser^M)
Aug 25 22:05:03 localhost chat[771]: expect (assword?)
Aug 25 22:05:07 localhost chat[771]: fakeuser^M
Aug 25 22:05:07 localhost chat[771]: Password?
Aug 25 22:05:07 localhost chat[771]: -- got it
Aug 25 22:05:07 localhost chat[771]: send (fakepass^M)
Aug 25 22:05:07 localhost pppd[770]: Serial connection established.
Aug 25 22:05:07 localhost pppd[770]: Using interface ppp0
Aug 25 22:05:07 localhost pppd[770]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
Aug 25 22:05:08 localhost pppd[770]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Aug 25 22:05:08 localhost pppd[770]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0xfe3acbcd> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Aug 25 22:05:08 localhost pppd[770]: write: warning: Input/output error (5)
Aug 25 22:05:08 localhost pppd[770]: Modem hangup
Aug 25 22:05:08 localhost pppd[770]: Connection terminated.
Aug 25 22:05:08 localhost pppd[770]: Connect time 0.1 minutes.
Aug 25 22:05:09 localhost pppd[770]: Exit.
I did the"TIMEOUT 5" because, using minicom, I saw that the dial-in server
expects 2 <ENTER>'s before asking for Userid: and I couldn't figure out how
to send 2 <ENTER>'s any other way using CAHT scripts except to send one,
timeout, and send the second.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dwight Rudolph Jr)
Subject: NFSD Won't Start
Date: 26 Aug 1999 22:03:31 GMT
I have a Redhat 5.2 / 2.0.36 system that can't start rpc.nfsd.
When trying to start it by hand (su - then rpc.nfsd -F) it whines:
svc_run: - select failed: Bad file descriptor
... Oh no Mr. Bill.... nfs_server() returned!
Perhaps the author was not particularly expecting this event.
This is, as far as I know (and I installed it), a normal 5.2 system,
with the exception that it has the extra-file-descriptor patches for
Informix 7.3. It certainly seems likely that there's a relationship.
This system really is running Informix, and doing it quite well, and I
need for it to continue doing that. I was wondering if anyone knows
something about this particular problem, or if it's time for me to
find the rpc.nfsd source and chase this problem, probably back into
the kernel and the Informix patch.
Thanks,
Dwight Rudolph
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: redhat.networking.general,redhat.servers.general
Subject: wu_ftp problem
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 21:30:56 GMT
I am using wu_ftp (different versions) on both REDHAT5.2 and 6.0.
Here is the problem:
After I type "ftp myftpserver" from a client machine,
"connected to myftpserver" message immediately shows. But after that,
it take a few minutes to get "FTP server ready" message and "Name:"
prompt.
Any idea what causes this?
TIA,
Jiu
================== Posted via CNET Linux Help ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
