Linux-Networking Digest #415, Volume #12 Mon, 30 Aug 99 19:13:51 EDT
Contents:
localnet with SyncPPP migrating to cable ("Marout Yasuo Borms")
Re: Problems transfering large files (Robert Cox)
ypserv refuses connections ("Aleem Sunderji")
Re: Majordomo �ķ��ؽ�� : testing ... testing ... testing ... (Gregory J. Higby)
Re: linux box vs switched hub (David C.)
Re: Read/Write to Network Interfaces. (David C.)
Re: Telenet: DHCPCD does not renew in time, and connection gets lost (Cable Modem)
("Robert_Glover")
Masquerade with multiple e-mail accounts? ("Cameron, Gary [WDLN2:2Y82:EXCH]")
How do I setup DHCP? (Ronald Cole)
pci NIC on Linux ("mark")
ipfwadm & masquerade ("Patrick Finance")
Switch ISP's between disconnects? ("Rob")
Re: cost of leased line in notting hill, London England (colin)
Re: Problems with SMC EtherPower II (Richard van der Hoff)
Samba help required ("Paco")
Re: Network card - newbie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: linux router works for 30 minutes, then hangs. (not hardware !!!!) (s)
how to set up both DHCP and localnet ("Marout Yasuo Borms")
Is this possible? (Mike)
Re: Password (Aaron Slepecky)
Ethernet/PCMCIA problems ("Jesus Arango")
NFS Daemon Failed to load: nfssvc not Implemented (root)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Marout Yasuo Borms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: localnet with SyncPPP migrating to cable
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 21:21:10 +0200
Reply-To: "Marout Yasuo Borms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
who can help me? I have following setup:
localnet with several winsucks 9x machines.
linuxbox (SuSE 6.1):
localnet on eth0 (ne2k-pci)
IP 192.168.100.10, netmask 255.255.255.0
DNS 192.168.100.10 (full functional with forwarding to ISP's DNS)
firewall with IPchains
IPmasquerading hides local net from internet
internet connection is ISDN with SyncPPP (Ippp0)
everything is set up very basic using standard scripts supplied by suse.
I want to replace the ISDn with an A200 cable modem.
trouble is, these suckers are the only cable company in AMsterdam (NL) and
they use DHCP for configuring
cablemodem connections.
When I tell YaST (SuSE setup tool to use DHCP client facilities, bang my
network is gone, only eth0 gets initialised als using dhcp.
my local net totally vanishes and only when I plug the cable modem in eth0,
i get an internet connection.
ETH1 (3c503) which should house the cablemodem connection, isn't set up at
all....
anybody got experience on this?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Cox)
Subject: Re: Problems transfering large files
Date: 30 Aug 1999 16:13:06 GMT
We are having weird problems, too. FTP-ing or rcp-ing large files
between SGI and Linux (RH6.0) systems sometimes results in the
files being corrupted (detected via MD5 checksums).
bob cox
------------------------------
From: "Aleem Sunderji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ypserv refuses connections
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 21:14:12 GMT
I'm trying to access the NFS-exported files on my Linux machine from my
Windows machine, but my NIS server won't talk to my Windows NFS client
(Interdrive).
When I run rpcinfo on the Linux machine to check the status of ypserv, it
doesn't respond.
The debug trace from ypserv is shown below....any tips are appreciated.
[------here is the startup of ypserv ------------]
[Welcome to the NYS YP Server, version 1.3.5 (with tcp wrapper)]
ypserv.conf: dns: 0
ypserv.conf: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:shadow.byname:2:1:2
ypserv.conf: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:*:0:0:2
[---------here's what happens when I do rpcinfo -u localhost
ypserv-----------]
ypproc_null() [From: 127.0.0.1:1032]
refused connect from 127.0.0.1
ypproc_null() [From: 127.0.0.1:1032]
refused connect from 127.0.0.1
ypproc_null() [From: 127.0.0.1:1032]
refused connect from 127.0.0.1
[----------here's what happens when I try to browse the NFS resources from
the client----------]
ypproc_match(): [From: 10.0.0.2:989]
domainname = "aleem.com"
mapname = "passwd.byname"
keydat = "aleem"
refused connect from 10.0.0.2
-> Ignored (not a valid source host)
[-------------Here's what the user doing the rpcinfo sees-----------------]
[root@cr277188-a /root]# rpcinfo -u localhost ypserv
rpcinfo: RPC: Timed out
program 100004 version 1 is not available
rpcinfo: RPC: Timed outprogram 100004 version 2 is not availabl
[----------Here are the contents of my hosts.allow and hosts.deny
files-----------]
#
# hosts.allow This file describes the names of the hosts which are
# allowed to use the local INET services, as decided
# by the '/usr/sbin/tcpd' server.
#
in.ftpd: ALL
in.telnetd: ALL
portmap: 10.0.0.2
portmap: 127.0.0.1
===========================================
#
# hosts.deny This file describes the names of the hosts which are
# *not* allowed to use the local INET services, as decided
# by the '/usr/sbin/tcpd' server.
#
# The portmap line is redundant, but it is left to remind you that
# the new secure portmap uses hosts.deny and hosts.allow. In particular
# you should know that NFS uses portmap!
ALL: ALL
Thanks,
Aleem.
------------------------------
From: Gregory J. Higby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Majordomo �ķ��ؽ�� : testing ... testing ... testing ...
Date: 31 Aug 1999 03:59:48 +0800
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsuscribe.>From: IN%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Majordomo �ķ��ؽ�� : testing ... testing ... testing ...
>
>
>>>>> can you test this page please with linux browsers, so i know if it looks OK
>>>>> on the linux side. I cannot fire up my linux SuSE system at the current due
>>>>> to problems beyond my control.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.linuxwarez.dabsol.co.uk
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> **** Bentium Mailing List Server --�������Լ����ʼ��б� ****
>>>>> ��֪���飬��� http://www.bentium.net/
>**** û�кϷ������
>**** �����������ڵ����ʼ���������, �������ʼ��������С�
>
>**** [EMAIL PROTECTED]����:
>
>��ӭʹ��ͨ���ʼ��б�ϵͳ��
>
>ͨ���ʼ��б��ṩ��ѵ��ʼ��б�����ͨ��ͨ������Դ����Լ����ʼ��б�
>
>���ڷ����Լ������ĵ�����־���������������顢����ͬѧ¼����ҳ����֪ͨ
>
>��˾���ڷ����µIJ�Ʒ�ȡ�
>
>����Է���ͨ����ҳ http://www.e-lists.com.cn �õ��й�ͨ�ĸ�����Ϣ��
>
>��Ҳͨ����ҳ���ķḻ��ɵĸ��Ի�����ý�塣
>
>ͬʱ����Է����й�������־���˵���ҳ http://ezl.yeah.net ��
>
>
>
>--
> **** Bentium Mailing List Server --�������Լ����ʼ��б� ****
> ��֪���飬��� http://www.bentium.net/
--
**** Bentium Mailing List Server --�������Լ����ʼ��б� ****
��֪���飬��� http://www.bentium.net/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David C.)
Subject: Re: linux box vs switched hub
Date: 30 Aug 1999 16:59:00 -0400
"Graham Fountain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> One thing that is achieved with switches is the ability to allow
> 10MBit and 100Mbit clients on the same network, that can communicate
> with each other. With a normal 10/100 Hub the 100 clients can see
> each other, and the 10 clients can see each other, but the 10's can't
> see the 100's & vice versa.
Are these still being made? Every 10/100 hub I've seen in stores have a
2-port layer-2 switch inside to allow the two sides to bridge the 10M
and 100M segments.
(I say layer-2 switch, because routers are sometimes referred to as
layer-3 switches in product literature. I prefer the less ambiguous
terms repeater, bridge, and router instead of hub, layer-2 switch and
layer-3 switch.)
> A Linux computer can be set up with both 10 and 100 MBit cards in it
> to provide the link between your 10MBit and 100MBit networks. This
> allows you to save on the expense of buying a big switch, allowing you
> to use the much cheaper hubs. This still won't give you as much
> bandwith as a hub, and it will impact on the performance of the linux
> computer, although I can't give you any figures of how much it will
> impact it. I use a P133 and it doesn't seem to hurt it too much.
The big deal will depend on how much of the 100M side is utilized. A PC
shouldn't have any problem keeping up with 2 or 3 10M Ethernet
interfaces. But it is highly unlikely that it will be able to service a
100M interface at line rate.
Part of the cost of a switch is the dedicated hardware that can actually
keep up with 100Mbps per port. Assuming that the switch is
non-blocking, of course. Blocking switches exist - they use memory
buffers to hold packets when the data rate exceeds what the chips can
handle. But they will start dropping packets if the overload persists
long enough to fill the buffer. Non-blocking switches (especially those
with large numbers of ports) can be expensive devices.
> A router will only route TCP/IP packets over the network. You set up
> your 10MBit clients on one subnet (say 192.168.1.0/24) and your
> 100MBit clients on another subnet (say 192.168.2.0/24). Given this,
> you would then set the net cards up in the linux box as 192.168.1.1
> for the 10MBit and 192.168.2.1 for the 100Mbit. You would then use
> ipchains to get it to route data to and from the 192.168.1.0 and
> 192.168.2.0 networks. Each workstation will need to be told that the
> relevant ip address in the linux box is its "gateway" address. If you
> want Windows Networking browsing available to you, you will also need
> to set up a "WINS" server on your network. Routing also has the
> advantage that you can have some level of control over the packets.
> For example you can stop certain types of packets traversing the
> network.
All true, up to the level of control. You can stop certain types of
packets from crossing the router. But you can't prevent them from
traversing individual subnets unless you give each host a direct
connection to the router. Because of the limited number of Ethernet
cards that you can install in one PC, this usually isn't a viable
option. (Hardware routers that can route and filter packets on dozens
of ports at once exist. They're not cheap.)
> A bridge operates a little differently, in that it makes the two
> different network topologies to appear as one physical network.
> Instead of looking at the destination IP addresses, the linux computer
> looks at the Ethernet address of each packet and routes it
> accordingly. All of your computers, both 10's and 100's would be on
> the same subnet, because as far as each is concerned, it thinks it is
> communicating direct to the other. One advantage of a bridge is that
> it can also route Netbeui, IPX/SPX, and any other ethernet protocols.
> In this respect it functions almost the same as the ability of a
> switch to link 10 and 100 networks. I'm not 100% sure, but I think a
> bridge configuration would require more CPU power on the Linux machine
> than a router configuration.
I wouldn't ever use the word "route" in conjunction with a bridge.
Routing is a buzzword that always refers to layer-3 protocols (like IP
and IPX). Bridging is the buzzword that refers to layer-2 protocols
(like Ethernet and TokenRing.)
The advantage of a bridge is that it needs little or no configuration.
It automatically learns the Ethernet MAC addresses of each computer
attached to it, by snooping the headers of every Ether frame is
receives.
Bridging should use less CPU power than routing, because they do less
processing per packet. Bridge code has only to receive the packet,
compare the destination Ethernet address against the bridging table
(which it learns by snooping Ether frames), and either retransmit it out
a port, flood it to all ports, drop it, or send it up the protocol stack
to a local application.
Routing software, on the other hand, does a lot more. It has to look
into the Ethernet packet, deterime if the layer-3 protocol is something
it supports (IP is usually supported, but other protocols may also be),
then it has to look up the destination address against a table that is
usually more complex than a bridging table, then it has to rewrite the
packet's header (decrement the TTL, and generate a new layer-2 header)
before transmitting the result. For a multiprotocol router (that might
handle IPX, AppleTalk, and other protocols), there must be separate sets
of tables and processing modules for each protocol. And all this
assumes that the routing tables are statically configured - if you're in
a situation where routes may change, then you also have to run routing
protocol code like RIP, OSPF, IS-IS, or BGP to keep your routing tables
synchronized with reality.
Both bridging and routing get significantly more complicated if they are
to properly support multicasting.
Although this group really isn't appropriate for a detailed discussion
of routing, if you have more questions, feel free to ask.
-- David
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David C.)
Subject: Re: Read/Write to Network Interfaces.
Date: 30 Aug 1999 16:36:31 -0400
Sai Prasad Matam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I want to read/write IP-Packets / Ethernet Frames from network
> interfaces using Linux. Is there an API which will allow me to do this
> ?
>
> Any pointers to information would be greatly appreciated.
If you're using the 2.2.x kernel, there are simple APIs present. You
can do all this through the socket interface.
Here are some man pages (in alphabetical order) to get you started:
man getsockopt
man ip
man packet
man raw
man 2 socket
man 4 socket
It's possible with earlier versions of the kernel as well, but it's not
nearly as easy.
-- David
------------------------------
From: "Robert_Glover" <Please_reply_to@newsgroup>
Subject: Re: Telenet: DHCPCD does not renew in time, and connection gets lost (Cable
Modem)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 19:15:04 -0000
What happens if you take down the interface and restart dhcpcd? In
particular do you, in fact, get a new IP address or do you get the
same IP address. Of course even if you get the same IP address, it
could be that your lease on it expired and, as such, it is invalid.
# this will take down your cable-modem link and bring it back up
ifconfig eth1 down
killall dhcpcd
dhcpcd -h terrence eth1
This happens to me too, but it's not just DNS, it's ping as well. I
iether can't ping the gateway or I get ping times of 3000ms or more.
When that happens, I just restart eth1 and it goes away. I wonder
what would cause it in the first place.
Oh, I forgot to mention that I also get the same problem ocasionally
with my local net eth0. Except it doesn't use DHCP. I suspect a
kernel bug of some sort.
Terrence Vergauwen wrote in message ...
>Hi,
>
>When i fire up my dhcp client on my masq router(dhcpcd -h terrence
eth1), i
>correltly receive an ip adress from my cable provider (telenet,
belgium),
>and everything works fine.
>
>After a few hours my internet connection dissapears, etc: i cannot
ping over
>the router, and my router has no connection anymore. (telnet to it
and it
>hangs in a DNS resolution timeout for 2 mins etc...)
>
>I think the problem is that it does not renew the adress in time. The
>interface still runs with the same ip adress, but actually the ISP
thinks i
>already have a new ip adress and has changed it's filters & routing
tables
>on their servers.
>
>Has anyone seen this ???
>
>Note: my setup used to work fine for 3 months, this problem has
started
>about 2 weeks ago, i think they changed some stuff on their DHCP
servers.
>
>Greetings,
>Terrence
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Cameron, Gary [WDLN2:2Y82:EXCH]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Masquerade with multiple e-mail accounts?
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 16:57:24 -0400
Has anybody managed to set up demand dialing and IP masquerade to
work with multiple e-mail accounts? I have a home ISP and need to dial
into work as well, both from the linux box and the Win95 PC connected to
it. Any help would be much appreciated.
--
~~~
/@ @\
===========oOO={ U }=OOo==========================================
\ ^ /
__ _ ___// _ __ _____ __ _ Gary Cameron, P. Eng
| , \| |/ //\| | .\|_ _|/ \| | DSP Software Developer
| |\ | | // | / | | | -- /| |_ Wireless Carrier Networks
|_| \ _|\//__/|_|\_\ |_| \ ___||___| (613)-763-1817 (ESN 6+393-1817)
// Nortel Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Ronald Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How do I setup DHCP?
Date: 30 Aug 1999 14:14:13 -0700
Cairn <limondin@u!s!w!e!st.net> writes:
> Anyway, this solved all my problems. Now I have one card on
> 192.168.0.2 and the other causing me headaches as I try to learn
> about DHCP.
The LASG swears by DHCP. Where's a good FAQ or manual?
--
Forte International, P.O. Box 1412, Ridgecrest, CA 93556-1412
Ronald Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Phone: (760) 499-9142
President, CEO Fax: (760) 499-9152
My PGP fingerprint: 15 6E C7 91 5F AF 17 C4 24 93 CB 6B EB 38 B5 E5
------------------------------
From: "mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pci NIC on Linux
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 20:43:31 GMT
I have a ISA NIC card (3c509) running fine on LINUX. If I want to
upgrade to a PCI (3c905B), how should I do it? Is there anyway
to reconfig the system so that it recognize the new card instead
of reinstall the whole system?
Thanks a lot
------------------------------
From: "Patrick Finance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ipfwadm & masquerade
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 14:31:50 +0200
Hi,
I'm trying to configure a Firewall securised and giving access to the
Internet to my local network.
Here is a part of my rc.firewall file:
#!/bin/sh
# patch for the FTP Masq
modprobe ip_masq_ftp
# flush everything
ipfwadm -F -f
ipfwadm -O -f
ipfwadm -I -f
# default policy : deny
ipfwadm -F -p deny
ipfwadm -I -p deny
ipfwadm -O -p deny
# masquerade lines
ipfwadm -F -a accept -m -S 172.16.6.0/255.255.255.0 -D 0.0.0.0/0
# other lines regarding the firewall security... (not put in this message).
It works if I put accept as default policy, but if I put deny, my masquerade
won't work.
I must have forgotten some more lines in this configuration to make my
masquerade work.
Please, if someone could give me the lines which are missing. I have already
looked at some Howtos, but they don'y give me a working config. Need
someone's experience.
Cheers
Guillaume
------------------------------
From: "Rob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Switch ISP's between disconnects?
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 17:28:13 -0400
This probably sounds like an odd problem, but I would like to setup my dial
up scripts to switch between 2 ( or more for that matter ) ISP when I either
get disconencted or terminate the connection on my own. Why? Many ISP's
are becoming more stringent in monitoring connect times, and I would like to
spread the usage over multiple accounts.
Has anyone done this sort of thing before?
Regards,
Rob
------------------------------
From: colin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: cost of leased line in notting hill, London England
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 12:31:02 GMT
Rob van der Putten wrote:
>
> Hi there
>
>
> In comp.os.linux.networking colin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Cheers for any advice......:)
>
> You could try an analog line with baseband modems.
> It may also be interresting to look at EU law.
>
>
Can you give me any more info about this? Like, can I get say ten fixed IP
addresses, and is the connection stable enough to sit a web/databse server
at one end of it?
Colin
================== Posted via CNET Linux Help ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: Richard van der Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Problems with SMC EtherPower II
Date: 30 Aug 1999 21:51:30 +0100
I recently posted about my problems getting my Etrherpower II working,
but unfortunately didn't get very far - this is basically a plea to
say, if anyone has any suggestions, I'd be most grateful!
I haven't repeated the diagnostics outputs in the uinterest of
bandwidth, but the symptoms are (essentially) that the card is
detected correctly, but no packets are sent or received.
TIA
--
Richard van der Hoff | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jesus College, Cambridge, England | http://www.jesus.cam.ac.uk/~rav21
=======================================================================
------------------------------
From: "Paco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba help required
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 15:00:54 +0200
Hi there
I have a NT Domain controller, some 95 workstations and one Redhat Linux 6.0
box.
I have Samba installed and all the win95 machines can access any share of
the linux box. I can however not connect from or to the NT PDC from the
Linux machine. network functionality is there and i can ping both ways with
no hassles.
When from within NT i try to connect to the Linux box i get the following
error:
This workstation does not have permission to access
Any ideas
Thanks
JP
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Network card - newbie
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 04:13:57 GMT
>>
>> Windoze tell me that it's io is 0xb800 but all the books suggest it
>> should be on 0x300 or 0x310.
>>
The first address is in the PCI address range wheras the second and
third address are ISA addresses...
--snip--
>
>(3) Make sure your conf.modules file has the following 2 lines in it
>(assuming your NIC's irq is 10 and io address at 0xb800):
>options eth0 io=0xb800 irq=10
>alias eth0 via-rhine
>
--snip--
...most likely, your Bios will assign the card address and IRQ
automatically (depending on the card slot location). Therefore, the
"options" line may not be necessary (my system works without it).
If you want to use the "options" line, I suggest you make sure you use
the correct address and interrupt: look at the file /proc/pci and
search for a line that starts with "ethernet controller". This line
and the next lines show you where RH6.0 has found your card.
------------------------------
From: s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: linux router works for 30 minutes, then hangs. (not hardware !!!!)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 04:18:09 GMT
just out of for fun try this if u have a cable modem box like my with
more the
one ether net drop the siwcth then for a day and see what happens may be
you have a flakey prot god look i an still tyring to get my athome
service to work at all from linux
Terrence Vergauwen wrote:
>
> I installed a linux IP MASQ router 3 months ago.
>
> I used the LRP 1 floppy disk distro (www.linuxrouter.org), i installed
> everything correctly using an old 386/40MHZ with no FPU and 8MB Ram, and a
> 3C509 3com card and a NE2000 clone.
>
> it worked perfectly for 2 months, and suddenly without touching anything my
> system hangs every 30 minutes.
> I changed ALL hardware components (MB, net cards, io controller, psup,
> etc...) without any change.
>
> No modification has been made to my LRP disk (i sealed the write protection
> switch on the floppy disk when i first installed the machine).
>
> My internet connection on the NE2000 clone network card using a cable modem
> works fine if i connect a win95 notebook directly to the cable modem (for
> dayyyyssss)...
>
> I am beginning to loose thrust in linux as a stable kernel platform.....
>
> I tried everything ...
>
> Anyone seen this before ?????
>
> Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED], no lists or newsgroups please....
>
> Greetings,
> Terrence
------------------------------
From: "Marout Yasuo Borms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: how to set up both DHCP and localnet
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 22:16:08 +0200
Reply-To: "Marout Yasuo Borms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
who can help me? I have following setup:
localnet with several winsucks 9x machines.
linuxbox (SuSE 6.1):
localnet on eth0 (ne2k-pci)
IP 192.168.100.10, netmask 255.255.255.0
DNS 192.168.100.10 (full functional with forwarding to ISP's DNS)
firewall with IPchains
IPmasquerading hides local net from internet
internet connection is ISDN with SyncPPP (Ippp0)
everything is set up very basic using standard scripts supplied by suse.
I want to replace the ISDn with an A200 cable modem.
trouble is, these suckers are the only cable company in AMsterdam (NL) and
they use DHCP for configuring
cablemodem connections.
When I tell YaST (SuSE setup tool to use DHCP client facilities, bang my
network is gone, only eth0 gets initialised als using dhcp.
my local net totally vanishes and only when I plug the cable modem in eth0,
i get an internet connection.
ETH1 (3c503) which should house the cablemodem connection, isn't set up at
all....
anybody got experience on this?
------------------------------
Subject: Is this possible?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 21:27:36 GMT
Is this possible?
Here is the scenario I'd like:
Internet
|
|
modem
|
+-------------+ +-------------+
| | | |
| Box A | | Box B |
| Redhat 6 | | Redhat 6 |
| Apache |-NIC---Hub---NIC-| Netscape |
| PHP | | |
| MySQL | | Web Files |
| Netscape | | |
| VMWare | +-------------+
| | |
| +---------+ |
| | Box C | |
| |(virtual)| |
| | Win 98 | |
| | IE | |
| +---------+ |
+-------------+
Now, I'd like it so that when Box B or Box C requests a page, it will be
served from Box A's Apache server over the LAN. I'd like the web files
to be stored on Box B's drive (and accessed through NFS or something),
because it has a lot more room on its hard drive.
When Box A requests the same page with its browser, I want it to be
served from the internet.
Boxes B and C should never connect to the internet.
The same address needs to be used for all 3 browsers so that I don't
need two different scripts (one for the web & one for at home), i.e.
http://www.bigmweb.com/foo/bar.php3
I'd copy the directory structure of my provider's drive on Box A (with a
share from Box B) and set up everything the same way.
Mike
------------------------------
From: Aaron Slepecky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: redhat.general
Subject: Re: Password
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 21:31:03 GMT
I need to clarify something. The password does not work when trying to
pop mail. My inetd.conf has POP3 enabled and it was working fine. I
don't remember making any changes but sometimes people here make a subtle
change without saying anything. Does anyone know why pop3 wouldn't
authenticate a valid password?
Aaron Slepecky wrote:
> I have two zones (or domains) set up on my linux box. Suddenly the
> password for my one zone is not being recognized. This is a problem
> because both are the same! Or at least they are supposed to be the
same.
> I even created a new account and that account's password doesn't work on
> the second domain. The catch, everyone else at my company can use their
> accounts fine with no problems. Just me and any account I create woes
not
> work?
>
> Anyone have any advice or tell me where to start?
>
> Thanks!
> Aaron
>
> ------------------ Posted via CNET Linux Help ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
================== Posted via CNET Linux Help ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: "Jesus Arango" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.periphs.pcmcia,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,fj.net.media.ethernet
Subject: Ethernet/PCMCIA problems
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 18:39:05 -0700
Hi,
I'm having trouble getting my ethernet pcmcia card to work under linux. I
wonder if any one can help me diagnose the problem.
The card is a 3com 3CCFE575B-DT Fast Etherlink XL
Linux Kernel: 2.2.5-15
pcmci-cs version 3.0.14
The system reports no problems but the card does not work. Card works on
other systems and under win98 in the same system. I set up the IRQ to 9,
which is the same value I used under win98.
All drivers are loading, the network.opts is properly configured and the
network script is properly executing. The machines gives two high beeps as
if everything was ok.
ifconfig command shows all configuration is OK, but it shows some rather
high numbers in the overruns and carrier fields. For example:
overruns: 130, carrier:30
Thanks for any help
Jesus
------------------------------
From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: NFS Daemon Failed to load: nfssvc not Implemented
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 10:55:03 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When upgrading my RedHat 6.0 to kernels 2.2.10 and 2.2.12, the
NFS Daemon does not load properly.
At boot, I get FAILED, and when trying to run /usr/sbin/rpc.nfsd
manually, I get;
nfssvc: Function not implemented
NFS runs properly under the default RH6.0 kernel 2.2.5-15 kernel.
Any suggestions on how to fix this?
This problem exists on 2 seperate machines. A PII 400, 512MB RAM w/
RAID 5 (AMI MegaRAID), and a Dual PII 333, 256MB RAM, IDE.
Thanx in advance!
___________________________
James C. Montz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Northwest Internet Services
http://www.ncn.net
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
