Linux-Networking Digest #415, Volume #10          Sun, 7 Mar 99 16:13:46 EST

Contents:
  IPX and Windows (Nicholas Knouf)
  Re: smbmount from hell (bklimas)
  Re: VPN and IP Masquerading ("John Hardin")
  Re: ISDN with a Fritz card (Malware)
  Re: Ping yes, telnet no, HELP!!! (Wade Olsen)
  Re: Adding private SNMP mibs (James Moore)
  Re: Cannot connect to shared drives on SAMBA SERVER from WIN98 CLIENT (Paul Leon)
  Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? (Alec Herrmann)
  Re: IP Masquerading and iPhone ("A J Wilson")
  Re: Newbie: DHCPCD problems (Randy Kayfish)
  Re: isdn and internet (Tobias Reckhard (jester))
  ISDN with a Fritz card (Grant Foster)
  How do I setup ftp server (pascal)
  Re: leafnode dumping core (Tobias Reckhard (jester))
  Re: Ping works just fine.. But no http protocol?!? (Tobias Reckhard (jester))
  teltnet; can't login (Wim De Maesschalck)
  setting MTU and MRU (Sujat Jamil~)
  Re: DSL & Linux (Mark Peugeot)
  Re: Cannot connect to shared drives on SAMBA SERVER from WIN98 CLIENT (W.D. Allen)
  Cable Modem and Samba (Randy Kayfish)
  Re: HELP! pppd/chat stopped working all of a sudden (Malware)
  Re: Invoke diald automatically (Malware)
  Re: ISDN and Kernel 2.2 (Malware)
  Re: Compile 2.2.2 problem (Malware)
  Re: Linux C2 security compliance (David Polete)
  Logging into Samba from Windoze 98 (W.D. Allen)
  Re: ipfwadm problem with smtp - "no route to host" (Brian McCauley)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Nicholas Knouf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IPX and Windows
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 1999 19:33:41 -0800

Is there any way to manually set the IPX network number in Linux to
0x00000000 to make it work with Windows machines?  I have some Windows
machines where I'm unable to change their network numbers and I'd like
to make IPX work with them.  Thanks!

Nick Knouf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------

From: bklimas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: smbmount from hell
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 02:12:19 GMT

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> While trying to use smbmount I get the error
>
> smbmount //server/dir /dir -c me
>
> mount error: Invalid Argument
>
> After looking at the logs, I see:
> kernel: smb_dont_catch_keepalive: server->data_ready == NULL
>
> What the hell does that mean? heh
>
> -Greg
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

Newbie here. I would get an errror message like that when the
resource I was trying to mount was not available on the
Windows machine.

See my webpage for the description how I mount a Windows
directory under Linux:

http://www.magma.ca/~bklimas/FAQ.htm#mount_floppy_zipdrive

Hope this helps.

Best regards,

b.k.



------------------------------

From: "John Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: VPN and IP Masquerading
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 1999 16:18:57 -0800


Patrick Clauberg wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi,
>
>can I access a distant net via VPN being connected through
>IP-Masquerading?
>
>i there a howto or anything?
>
>tnx
>
>Patrick


Yep.

 ftp://ftp.rubyriver.com/pub/jhardin/ip_masq_vpn.html

Let me know if you have any problems.

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZ                               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin    PGP key ID: 0x41EA94F5
 PGP key fingerprint: A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5  E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76 
=======================================================================
  If you spend any time administering Windows NT, you're far too
  familiar with the Blue Screen of Death (BSOD) ...
                            - "MSDN Flash" email newsletter, 2/9/1999



------------------------------

From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: de.alt.comm.isdn4linux
Subject: Re: ISDN with a Fritz card
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 19:40:15 +0100

Hi Grant,

you wrote:
> The card is the Speedway card for BT Home Highway, which I have
> discovered is the AVM Fritz. ( I tried pnpdump and it found no devices,
> so I assume it is PCI, not PnP)

PCI does have it's own PnP that does differ from ISA PnP. You do not
need the isapnp-tools to setup the card.

> I am running Suse 6.0, kernel 2.0.36.
> When trying to configure the card using YAST, I get the following
> message:
> 
> /sbin/insmod /lib/modules/2.0.36/misc/hisax.o id=HiSax type=5 protocol=2
> irq=10
> io=0x340
> /lib/modules/2.0.36/misc/hisax.o: init_module: Device or resource busy

In the YaST set type to 27 and io and irq to 0. The Fritz!PCI does have
it's own type which does differ from the one for other Fritz!* cards.


Malware

------------------------------

From: Wade Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Ping yes, telnet no, HELP!!!
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 1999 21:55:10 -0800



Brian Dawson wrote:

> Have you made sure that the telnet dameon is actually started ( either in
> inetd.conf or rc.? files)? Have you tried to telnet into specific ports to
> see if services are in fact running?
>
> Try to telnet into your SMTP port and see if you can get a connection.
>
> Brian

All services work on locally on the linux hosts but not on the LAN. For
example the appache web server, telnet and sendmail all are working from the
linux box (as either gate (the machine name) or localhost) but not from the
LAN.

As an additional curiosity, I'm running dhcpd on the linux box and that works
for any of the windows machines I plug into the lan. I.e. they each get dyamic
IP addresses from the linux box.

Is there a pattern here? Broadcast packets are OK; TCP packed are blocked some
how? I don't know enough about network protocols to determine this.

Any other ideas?




------------------------------

From: James Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.dcom.net-management,comp.dcom.net-analysis
Subject: Re: Adding private SNMP mibs
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 16:38:41 -0500

On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Jim O'Shea wrote:

|I've got a Redhat 5.2 linux box.  I'm running MRTG (Multi Router Traffic
|Grapher) on it.  I'm trying to poll for some private CISCO mib variables. 
|Specifically, I'm looking for packets.  The variables are not available
|in the standard mibs.  

MRTG will accept the OID of a MIB variable without knowing anything about
the MIB itself. It just assumes that the information that it will get back
is the right type (gauge or counter). For instance:

Target[name]:.1.3.6.1.2.1.25.1.5.0&.1.3.6.1.2.1.25.1.5.0:community@host 

This will return the number of users from the host MIB.

Now if you don't know the OID then you could use a MIB browser to find it
or use the command line tools below.

|Anyway, when I do a snmpget command it says the mib variables are 
|unknown.  I'm assuming I need to install the private mibs from CISCO. 
|I'm told I need to compile the mibs on the box.  So I found CMU-SNMP.
|I downloaded the SRC, compiled it, and afterwards it locked up my box...

I have no idea why the CMU utils would lock up your machine. I used those
things for a long time without any problems. Nowadays though you should be
using the UCD snmp utilities. Among other advantages they provide greater
flexibility as far as adding extra MIBS.

Take a look at: http://ucd-snmp.ucdavis.edu/

Good Luck

James Moore -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CIRCA Telecommunications -- http://multicast.circa.ufl.edu/
voice: 392-2007 fax: 392-3760



------------------------------

Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 19:54:49 +0000
From: Paul Leon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Cannot connect to shared drives on SAMBA SERVER from WIN98 CLIENT

I'm no expert, but I can connect with 98 box to my file / folder shares on my
linux box:
A couple things you could try:

Encrypted Password Problem:

[global]
encrypt passwords = yes
password level = 20

Restart samba, then re-add your user to samba (to have encryption written) or
add new user. Rem out wins, etc.. start out with a simple config for your 98
client to connect successfully, then add one option by one (ie: domain login
for 98, wins, etc).

Checkout:

http://www.germanynet.de/teilnehmer/101,69082/samba.html#3.
http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/SMB-HOWTO.html

I found these sites saved me time and patience...

TURBO1010 wrote:

> I got the same problem, I made the file smbpasswd, what should be in
> smbusers to enable encryption?  I can log in with plain text, but not with
> encrypted passwords.
>
> David Kirkpatrick wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >Well what does smbusers look like?
> >
> >Ronald Hovens wrote:
> >>
> >> David,
> >>
> >> My smbpassword file is setup, but I cannot connect!
> >>
> >> David Kirkpatrick wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> >Ronald,
> >> >   Your smbpasswd may not be setup.  Look at the man for
> >> >smbpasswd its simple.  Also look at /etc/smbusers.
> >> >   The encryption is OK set at yes.
> >> >After you execute smbpasswd you shoud have something like the
> >> >following in your /etc/smbpasswd.
> >> >
> >> ># Samba SMB password file
> >>
> >root:0:7E638C38F146E9A6AAD3B435B51404EE:611B779573C5481E8091149DFC6A68EC:ro
> >> ot:/root:/bin/bash
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Ronald Hovens wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I am running a Linux samba server (1.9.18p10) and I want to connect to
> it
> >> >> with a Laptop that runs on Win98.
> >> >>
> >> >> TCP networking is running fine: I can telnet and ping from one to
> >> another.
> >> >> Furthermore, I can see the shared devices on the laptop when I run
> >> >> smbclient -L hostnameoflaptop> on my linux samba server.
> >> >>
> >> >> My problem is that I cannot connect to (the shared devices on) my
> samba
> >> >> server: everytime I enter data in the win98 logon dialog, I get the
> >> message
> >> >> "the domain password you supplied is not correct, or access to logon
> >> server
> >> >> has been denied".
> >> >> ------------------------
> >> >> On my laptop I have set:
> >> >>
> >> >> primary logon: Client for micorsoft network
> >> >> workgroup in Identification: MYGROUP
> >> >> properties for Client for microsoft networks: Log on to windows NT
> domain
> >> >> MYGROUP
> >> >> wins enabled for the network connection (wins adress is the linux
> samba
> >> >> server IP adress)
> >> >> ------------------------
> >> >> Some relevant(?) settings on my samba server (in /etc/smb.conf):
> >> >>
> >> >> workgroup = MYGROUP
> >> >> encrypt passwords = yes (I have read that win98 sends encrypted
> >> passwords)
> >> >> smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
> >> >> os level = 34
> >> >> domain master = yes
> >> >> preferred master = yes
> >> >> domain logons = yes
> >> >> wins support = yes
> >> >>
> >> >> I assume that something is wrong with password encryption. What can I
> do?
> >> >> Please help.
> >> >> R. Hovens
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >--
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------

From: Alec Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.unix.solaris,comp.os.os2.networking.server,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 09:46:48 GMT

At the office I started off with one server which (at that time) had huge
drives so I called it BigMomma.  Later on, another server joined in -
BigPoppa - since a 'husband' was needed.  A communications server became
LilBro - one of the kids.
The latest one is UncleBob.  I guess you can see the trend.  The next one
just may be named AuntEmma or something like that.

James Gaster wrote:

> We use Monster Trucks, Bigfoot, Gravedigger, Predator... and we use  a
> picture of the truck as wall paper...
>
> --
> to reply remove _spamme_not


------------------------------

From: "A J Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP Masquerading and iPhone
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 07:09:45 +1100

I probably should have mentioned that I am using iphone version 5.0.

Austin

A J Wilson wrote in message <7buhsq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi
>
>I am trying to get iphone to work on my Win95 box through a linux box
>(running IP Masquerading) connected to the Internet.  I am using Redhat 5.1
>upgraded to kernel 2.0.36-3 and have installed ipautofw.  The settings I am
>using are
>
>ipautofw -A -r udp 22555 22555
>
>This setup allows me to dial out and talk and exchange video with someone.
>However, I am not contactable by anyone on the other side of my linux box.
>Could someone please assist by letting me know what settings are required
to
>allow someone on the internet to get through my linux box to contact me on
>my Win95 machine.
>
>Thanks
>Austin
>
>



------------------------------

From: Randy Kayfish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Newbie: DHCPCD problems
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 14:49:12 GMT

I believe for kernel 2.0.36 you need dhcpcd 0.70 (1.3 for kernel 2.2 I
believe).  try dhcpcd -h <your host name> eth0.  For my cable modem this
works fine.  My hostname was provided to me by my provider and MUST be
right.   Make sure and uninstall dhcpcd 1.3 beforehand.   Good Luck.




Axel Liljencrantz wrote:

> Beeing somwhat of a Linux Newbie, i realy need help setting up my ADSL
> connection with Linux!
> Tried Dejanews, but it didn't help, so i'd really be gratefull for any
> help.
> I've sucessfully set up the connection on Win98. My ISP uses DHCP to
> provide IP-addresses, and all comunication with the internet is done
> through a Proxy (Except for a special server used for loging on to the
> network, that doesn't use the Proxy).
> I use SuSE 6.0, and i downloaded DHCP v1.3, ran "tar", "make" and "make
> install", no problems reported.
>
> During startup, Linux reports finding my 3COM 10baseT card, saying:
> eth0: 3COM 3COM Boomerang (unknown version) at 0xb400,
> 00:10:5a:f0:3f:28, IRQ 10
>
> So i've tried to start dhcpcd, withch just returns immediatly, no
> errormessages or anything. Running ifconfig reports that
> eth0 HAS an inet addr. Does this mean DHCP is actually working? I've
> read that it should generat some files into the "/etc/dhcpc" directory,
> witch it doesn't. I've createt the directory, but it is empty.
> Another guess is that something might be wrong with the nameserver. I
> read that i should add something like
>
> nameserver 10.0.0.1
>
> in a file called /etc/resolv.conf
> So a created the file and saved it in that directory.
> But... No matter what i do, Netscape reports that the Proxy oesn't
> exist, and wont even let me save my settings. I've tried skipping the
> Proxy-part, but Netscape doesn't find the login server at all.
> So... have I missed some REALLY vital part, thus making a fool out of
> myself? Is DHCPcd even runing? Is something wrong with the DNS? Is
> Netscape just joking?
>
> I use
> SuSE 6.0
> kernel 2.0.36
> DHCPcd 1.3
>
> Gratefull for any help
>
> /Axel Liljencrantz


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tobias Reckhard (jester))
Subject: Re: isdn and internet
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 15:27:51 GMT

On Sat, 6 Mar 1999 01:14:11 +0100, "Hans-Juergen Seifen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>I have a small net. (5 Winnt and 2 linux boxes). The linux box has an isdn
>card inside. It works as an internet router. I have linked up with the nt
>workstations. internet works fine, but i' ve a big problem: every time i
>logon with the nt clients the linux box connects me to the internet.
>The nt boxes have the linux box as their default gateway and the linux box
>has as default route the isdn device (ippp0).
>What can I do? Please help me.

Step 1: Find out why the Linux box is connecting to the Inet. Install
an ipfwadm (or ipchains) rule that logs the packets going out and have
a look at the ports involved. Most probably, it's because of DNS
queries.

Step 2: Get more information about the reason for the connection. If
you found out in step 1, for example, that DNS queries are being made,
either block some of them (NetBios DNS queries), if you don't have a
DNS server on your LAN, or put your named into verbose mode, so you
can see what host names are being asked for.

Step 3: Counter the problem. What to do here depends on the cause of
the problem. One possibility would be to prevent that certain packets
traverse the TCP/IP stack's forwarding mechanism with ipfwadm or
ipchains.

Tobias / jester

------------------------------

From: Grant Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ISDN with a Fritz card
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 17:44:05 +0000

I have been trying to get an ISDN connection up and running with no luck
whatsoever.
The card is the Speedway card for BT Home Highway, which I have
discovered is the AVM Fritz. ( I tried pnpdump and it found no devices,
so I assume it is PCI, not PnP)
I am running Suse 6.0, kernel 2.0.36.
When trying to configure the card using YAST, I get the following
message:

/sbin/insmod /lib/modules/2.0.36/misc/hisax.o id=HiSax type=5 protocol=2
irq=10
io=0x340
/lib/modules/2.0.36/misc/hisax.o: init_module: Device or resource busy

That is with the ISDN as part of the kernel, with HiSax as a module.
I have tried with all relevent componets as modules, and with all
compiled into the kernel both with the same results.
The setting for the card under WinNT are IRQ=9 IO=fca0.SuSE kernel shows
the same when the whole lot is compiled in. ( Yes, when it is all
compiled into the kernel it detects the card).
I have also tried with these settings as well as the ones recommended
for the card.
I would appreciate any help anyone can give.

Thanks in advance

Grant Foster
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------

Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 10:16:59 -0500
From: pascal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How do I setup ftp server

Hi I would like to know how to set up a ftp server with x windows
I am new to linux and I configure everything even my cable modem so
please help me configure my ftp site
my email is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks all help is appreciated thanks again
pascal


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tobias Reckhard (jester))
Subject: Re: leafnode dumping core
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 15:38:34 GMT

On Sat, 6 Mar 1999 08:36:18 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (xcitor) wrote:

>leafnode (1.9) just started dumping core on me, or I should say fetch:
>
>[news@axel news]$ fetch
>Segmentation fault (core dumped)

>From the Leafnode 1.8 (I don't think it's changed concerning this
problem between 1.8 and 1.9) README:

Problem: fetch crashes with a segmentation fault.
Solution: Your groupinfo file may be corrupt. Again, this can be
repaired by starting fetch with the -f parameter. Make sure that you
have sufficient disk space available on the partition in which
/var/spool/news resides.

HTH
Tobias

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tobias Reckhard (jester))
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Ping works just fine.. But no http protocol?!?
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 15:06:14 GMT

On Fri, 05 Mar 1999 22:12:49 +0100, Michael Kristensen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>But I can't http to any servers, neither using Lynx or Netscape. And
>this is even though I can ping the web servers, using IP-no. or DNS
>name, with no problem what so even.

Just a hunch, but maybe your ISP doesn't allow direct HTTP access and
you need to use their proxy?

Tobias / jester

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wim De Maesschalck)
Subject: teltnet; can't login
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 12:50:47 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I have a linux-machine and I tried toe start a telenet-sssion (from a
win98-computer) de linix-servershows up but don's give an login-promt,
so I haven's even te opportunity to login.
Where can be the problem ??????
Greetings


Wim.



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sujat Jamil~)
Subject: setting MTU and MRU
Date: 6 Mar 1999 21:24:14 GMT


First, I apologize because this really is not a Linux question,
but I figured I'm likely to get an informed response in this
newsgroup.

So, here goes:

How do you set MTU and MRU for PPP in Windows 95/98?

In Linux, obviously these can easily set as options to pppd,
but I haven't been able to figure out how to set them in Windows.

I'm getting sigfinicant difference in net access performance
between Linux and Windows on a 56K modem connection, and I'm
suspecting the main reason is that in Linux, I have MTU and MRU set
to 1500, and I'm guessing Windows has them set to much smaller values
so not taking advantage of the 56K connection.

I searched for MTU and MRU in the Windows registry edit program,
regedit, with no luck.  

Any ideas?

Thanks much for your help.


Sujat


-- 
Sujat Jamil                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]       Tel: 602-554-9416
Merced(TM) Design Engineer   5000 W. Chandler Blvd.       Fax: 602-554-7388
Intel Corporation         CH7-400, Chandler, AZ 85226   Pager: 602-440-8090
===========================================================================

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 12:54:51 -0800
From: Mark Peugeot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DSL & Linux

Couple of things to know about DSL service.

More than likely they will either give you a static IP for one computer or they
will offer you a DHCP served IP address. If you get the chance, make sure that
you get a static address. Also select an ISP that knows Linux, why bother with
someone who won't support you.

Many ADSL "modems" are simply ethernet bridges. It makes things cheaper, and
the equipment can be pretty stupid. I know that where we are serving DSL
customers, many don't want to pay for extra IP addresses. Most have built Linux
or use NT to do Network Address Translation (NAT). This is a slick way of
having a lot of machines hooked up to one IP address over an ADSL connection.
Only a few things are not NAT friendly.... Microsoft's NetMeeting comes to
mind.

You'll need two NIC cards, yes you could do it with one if you are creative,
but you will suffer a performance penalty for bridging everything across your
ADSL connection. Set one side up as your real IP, the other side gets set up as
the 10.x.x.x network and configure your machine to do NAT (There is a how-to
for this.)

And one last thing ADSL is FAST, you'll really enjoy it.

Mark Peugeot,
Network One
888-GOT-NET-1

Don Baugh wrote:

> Our local TelCo offering ADSL says they only support PCs running Windows
> 95/98 and MACs.  Do you think they have done something unique?  Or could I
> let them set it up on a PC with Win95 as they require, then just move the
> NIC to the Linux box?
>




------------------------------

From: W.D. Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Cannot connect to shared drives on SAMBA SERVER from WIN98 CLIENT
Date: 7 Mar 1999 20:31:38 GMT


Chive wrote:
> 
> In article <7bs8s1$8kj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> says...
> > David,
> > 
> > My smbpassword file is setup, but I cannot connect!
> 
> Upgrade to Samba 2.0.3. I'm relatively new to Linux myself. But once I 
> upgraded Samba most of my configuration problems seemed to go away.

Where does one go to get Samba upgrades?

==================  Posted via SearchLinux  ==================
                  http://www.searchlinux.com

------------------------------

From: Randy Kayfish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Cable Modem and Samba
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 15:15:16 GMT

I am running RedHat 5.2 with kernel 2.0.36 and have my cable modem
running just fine.  I was thinking of getting Samba going as well to my
Win98 machine.  Shaw Cable uses dhcp to give me my ip address so I tried
adding a route/host etc (192.168.1.1) for Samba to use.  I have had no
luck getting my cable modem and Samba to work together.  Do I need 2
nics to accomplish this?  I tried disabling dhcp and setting my own IP
but then I can't connect to the net.  If I assign a route to eth0 (Cable
Modem) and try to ping it I get "Network is Unreachable".  Any help
appreciated.

Randy


------------------------------

From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HELP! pppd/chat stopped working all of a sudden
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 20:20:24 +0100

Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED],

you wrote:
> Mar  7 18:53:27 sporty chat[900]: send (rAT^M)
> Mar  7 18:53:27 sporty chat[900]: expect (OK)
> Mar  7 18:53:30 sporty chat[900]: alarm
> Mar  7 18:53:30 sporty pppd[899]: Connect script failed
> Mar  7 18:53:30 sporty chat[900]: Failed
> 
> what does the 'alarm' mean?

It did time out while waiting for "OK". "rAT" is most likely not a valid
command to the modem so it will answer with "ERROR" but not with "OK".


Malware

------------------------------

From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Invoke diald automatically
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 20:42:18 +0100

Hi Dinky,

you wrote:
> Is is possible to invoke diald automatically in a web browser such as
> netscape? As an eg, lets say we enter a URL and hit return, is it possible
> for diald to be activated without manually calling it up?

That's what diald is intented for. Read the manual.


Malware

------------------------------

From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: de.alt.comm.isdn4linux
Subject: Re: ISDN and Kernel 2.2
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 20:15:58 +0100

Hi Roland,

you wrote:
> I've a problem with Kernel 2.2 and ISDN. With Kernel 2.0.36 I could
> configure the dialmode option manual with Kernel 2.2 it isn't possible.
> Does anyone know where to get the actual ISDN subsystem for Kernel 2.2?

ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/isdn4linux/v2.1/

Malware

------------------------------

From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Compile 2.2.2 problem
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 20:38:16 +0100

Hi John,

you wrote:
> as86 -0 -a -o bbootsect.o bbootsect.s
> make[1]: as86: Command not found
> make[1]: *** [bbootsect.o] Error 127
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.2.2/arch/i386/boot'
> make: *** [bzImage] Error 2
> [root@firewall linux]#
> 
> I have found that the as86 is the GNU x86 compiler.  I am running gcc

You have to install the bin86-package too.


Malware

------------------------------

From: David Polete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux C2 security compliance
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 09:31:10 -0600

doug wrote:
> 
> Clearly, linux has proven to have better security features and enhancements
> that NT 4.0, but does anyone know whether linux has been accredited with C2
> security compliance for use in government or government contractor
> applications as NT 4.0 has?  Any help would be appreciated.
> 
> doug

i thought NT4 did have a C-2 - without any network functions
enabled.  just like the other posts said about 3.51 - any idea
why the DoD blatently disregards the C-2 requirement in building
NT based enterprise networks?

then again, if linux isn't certified then its not a viable
alternative in the 'eyes of the law'.  is certification in
the works or even possible for linux?

just curios,
dp

ps - i'll have to start watching the security groups.

------------------------------

From: W.D. Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Logging into Samba from Windoze 98
Date: 7 Mar 1999 20:31:45 GMT

I have been trying to get Samba connectivity from my Linux box to my W98 
client box.  

>From my W98 box, I can see the Linux box in the Mygroup that Samba is 
broadcasting.  However, when I double click the linux box, it identifies 
itself as //Linuxbox/IPC$ - and then wants a password.  

I followed the instructions in the Linux Network Toolkit book (published 
by IDG), but it obviously leaves out some important information.  What do 
I need to really do, is there a mini-howto that specifically addresses 
what should be a realatively simple Samba connectivity setup?  The Samba-
Howto is about as clear as mud.  If someone could give me a short step-by-
step, I would really appreciate it.  

Thanks,
WDA


==================  Posted via SearchLinux  ==================
                  http://www.searchlinux.com

------------------------------

From: Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ipfwadm problem with smtp - "no route to host"
Date: 07 Mar 1999 13:22:55 +0000

Darrell Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi. I have a problem with a red-hat 5.1 linux router.

Are you sure?

> ... I thought there might be a problem with the client, so I went to
> the router and telneted to port 25 of the mailserver I was trying to
> contact, and I immediately got "no route to host". Any ideas?

Sounds to my like you've elininated your Linux box's router
functionality as a cause.  Seems much more likely that there's another
firewall between you and the SMTP server in question and it is set to
deny you access.

Try pinging the SMTP server from the Linux box.  It that works and
"telnet ... smtp" doesn't then this is almost certaily your problem.

-- 
     \\   ( )  No male bovine  | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .  _\\__[oo   faeces from    | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
 .__/  \\ /\@  /~)  /~[   /\/[ |   +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
 .  l___\\    /~~) /~~[  /   [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
  # ll  l\\  ~~~~ ~   ~ ~    ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
 ###LL  LL\\ (Brian McCauley)  |

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to